Judge Martha Anderson Show Cause Hearing for Contempt

[jburr36]

This bitch was trying to use the court as a means to fulfill a personal vendetta against her ex. She got nailed by the judge and deserved what she got. I despise people that use the police or the courts for spite against an ex. These people ought to be publically humiliated.

[SisterMaryLitigation]

Denial of Due Process. No Order to appeal = EXTORTION !

[SisterMaryLitigation]

The female respondent (former client) documented the corruption, perjury and fraud-upon-the-court by Attny Nicoletti’ PPO petition which Judge Anderson ignored.

NO CASE, NO ORDER. There is NO LAW which prohibits correcting a false public record and the judge asks for cash. Aka Extortion. The clerk charged only $5 then committed credit card fraud and identity theft for charging an additional $495 WITHOUT the knowledge or consent of the litigant.

[ShelbyCitizen]

I am thinking this woman should be in jail. I do not know any of the parties but I do know that if a judge orders you to pay 500.00 for a frivolous motion (wasting the courts time and resources), you need to pay it. If the clerk makes a mistake this woman should have hired a lawyer. Judges have no respect for citizens without a lawyer. Remember, they were all lawyers once.

[SuperInnerpeace]

@ShelbyCitizen I'm thinking if I was going to go in front of the judge as in her case, I would go representing my self not pro se but sui juris. /that would have really ticked off the judge BUT the judge could have given her the information or at least what she had in front of her and I do believe she had a right to request it. I do believe if she had been sui juris the judge may have acted a little differently. Of course she may have sent her straight to jail, I have heard of that happening.

[djmarkcotter]

omg last time she could have gotten contempt....which could mean jail time, she should have just paid the money

[Howdy2Doody]

This judge sanctioned the abused lady, without a court rule or law to rely upon for sanctions, without a court order, and without a case, so the lady was just a bystander. Look up the legal definition of EXTORTION. Why is there a SHOW CAUSE HEARING for CONTEMPT, when the clerk made an error. Look at all the Court rules which were violated. We have rule of law, improper service, no affidavit, etc.

[kenjohnsonmusic]

remember, the judge can make an order from the bench. Doesn't have to be written to get you to comply first.

[kate1537]

Not true. The Court speaks through its written orders. Check the law. I am a family attorney. If the judge issues an oral decision, it MUST be reduced to a written order -- if it is not -- then blame your attorney or yourself if you are in pro per.

[Howdy2Doody]

see more of the Judge martha DAMIANI Anderson story at courthouseforum (dot) com

[Howdy2Doody]

Attny Nicoletti filed his perjured Petitions for PPO's in the incorrect county. Judge Martha Anderson does not even have jurisdiciton. Nicoletti filed in Oakland because he clerked there and was part of the "family" PPO Petitions must be filed in the county where the Respondent resides.

[Howdy2Doody]

The Nicoletti PPO Petititon was full of perjury as there was no stalking, or threats, much less the 2 non-consecutive events required by law. The Nicoletti intent was to create a false public record with his frivolous and vexatious claims.

MCR 2.114 (F) and MCR 2.625 (A) (1) (2) as provided by MCL 600.2591; MSA 27A 2591

[Howdy2Doody]

The Nicoletti PPO Petititon was full of perjury as there was no stalking, or threats, much less the 2 non-consecutive events required by law. The Nicoletti intent was to create a false public record with his frivolous and vexatious claims.

MCR 2.114 (F) and MCR 2.625 (A) (1) (2) as provided by MCL 600.2591; MSA 27A 2591