Why everyone talking about different or more upgrades? You could do alot to either one of there cars and make it stupid fast. I drive a 97 gtp which ran a 14.8 in 1/4 mile this summer with nothing but exaust and a K&N filter. I know with a 3.4 pully and a tune you can get gtps runnin 13's all day long. You could also do a few upgrades to the 5.0 and have it lifting the wheels off the ground on launch!
Def a stock mustang... anymore I don't even count gears as an upgrade because all new cars have a better set of gears already installed...the intake doesn't help a damn thing but look better...so the guy has a set of mufflers. It even sounds like it is running through the stock catted H pipe.
Stock 5.0. I work tirelessly with these Mustangs, I can hear the sound difference between different heads. This 5.0 has stock heads. It's an intake/exhaust/gears car, that's it. A Comp G is a low 15 car @ 93 mph. My '92 convertible 5.0/5 speed with only pulleys and exhaust went 14.05 @ 97.5 mph on street tires. Nothing removed, still had spare tire and jack in the trunk, stock paper air filter etc, 3460 lbs race weight. A 5.0 with stock iron GT40s, stock cam, and GT40 intake traps ~103 mph.
@gtdrummerdude I could see a low 15 from a comp G if it spins too much or at elevation. But my comp G at minnesota altitude ran 14.776@94.8 bone stock on street tires. Not up to par with your mustang, but with a pulley and intake or exhaust like your mustang has im pretty sure id pick up a few mph to be in that 97-98 area at least, not sure how much e.t. id pick up though if i stuck with street tires.
@circlelt1 Well shoot a pulley on your car is worth a little more than a pulley on mine lol whole different thing, I recently switched out the stock intake manifold on my car for one off a '99 Explorer. HUGE difference. I picked up an extra 600 rpm of powerband and 2 mph in the 1/4. Should be able to hit 100 mph with the intake mani, pulleys and exhaust only. Throw a 3.25 pulley and fuel mods at your car with intake and exhaust, it'll hit 100 easy.
@gtdrummerdude Nice, yeah problem with the series-3 L67 is theyre more prone to KR. So, what would be like a "stage 1" for me would probably be only a 3.5/3.6 pulley, plugs, pcm, intake, dp, tune. 100mph is my goal aswell.
GTP All most won. All you need is a racing cam then you win. On less the Mustang does more modds lol. Then you have to keep modding. O well good video anyway
@Silkmaster4200 lol those mods dont even add that much HP, exhaust, intake are basically for sound and gears and heads by themselves only do so much if he even has any, plus that car is atleast 10 years older than the supercharged v6 i wouldnt be trying to brag lol
the GTP was stock , if the Stang was stock it might be a different story. When i had my GTP i never raced a mustang , but im sure stock for stock, story might have a different outcome.
I bet it did have head work, the eighties to very early nineties 5.0 earned the name five slow for a reason. 175-225hp. Barely lighter and less powerful than a gtp, if it was relatively stock this would be an extermination, not a race. No disrespect, I've owned both.
@miniz33 I owned a 1986 5.0 GT with 5-speed and I can tell you I used to SMOKE GM's up until 1989, when the 350's FINALLY made some decent power. The equivalent 5.0 from Chevy in the Camaro and Firebird were ZERO competition. I'd spot them 1.5 lengths at the light, and by 2nd/3rd gear shift, was passing them like they were just sitting there! Now put a chip on that 305 and it was close, and a chip on the 350 meant I lost, until I spent $1,200 on mods and ran 13.6@105. Bye, Bye GM!!
@marcomariaz26 Thats nice, Im not discussing the chevy 5.0. The 305 and 307 were the low end bastard childs of GM, I'm glad you could beat cars from the dark period of gm. You must be proud.
@miniz33 I did mention 350's, but apparently you missed that one... Besides, that was a long time ago and I was just sayin'... I didn't consider the car a 'five slow' and if it was that slow, imagine what that says for GM if they consistently got smoked?? Talk about GM being a failure - no wonder the Gov't had to bail their sorry asses out and Ford didn't take dollar one... lol...
@marcomariaz26 Because your modded 5 0 beating stock firebirds (im sure) is totally a metaphor for how a multinational corporation operates nowadays. I've never owned a ford, with the exception of the 5 slow, thats lasted 10k miles without breaking down. GM's only issue was expanding into too many monikers and sub companies, guilty of being optimistic. Maybe
@miniz33 You misunderstood me. When the '86 was bone stock, it took until '89 for the GM's to catch up. By then, my friend's 89 5.0 was dusting GM's. I've owned a GM since 1994, and can speak from experience they are not reliable. Same goes for Fords of the same genre. My 1992 Beretta was always having some issue and just before x-mas my 1996 Beretta died - broken camshaft. Never again will I own a GM, unless I have a mid-life crisis and get a Corvette or something impractical like that.
A beretta, the cheapest end of chevys lineup is going to sully your opinion of a company, I can easily be as obtuse as to buy an escort or tempo and base my opinion on those. You're so badass in your 80's "high performance" cars, with all of 185 hp... All in all, nobody really cares if your 5.0 was "fast", people like you make me regret even owning one, 5.0s have as big of a douche bag following as BMW's, STIs, and lancer evos. One look at your channel left me feeling gratified
@miniz33 Actually, the Cavalier was cheaper!! What car had 185hp?? The Mustang had 200 stock, 270 when I was done with it. All American cars blew goats in terms of reliability from the 70's until the 2000's. If you don't know this, you're delusional. Now, yes, GM and Ford can finally make a decent car, but it's too little, too late for this American. Glad to hear you 'gratified' yourself while on YouTube... LOL...
@marcomariaz26 Early model five slows had that pitiful amount of power, I'm glad you agree your beloved fords certainly blew ass. I certainly felt gratified in my argument with one look at you, you douchebag.
@miniz33 Nice to get personal. Shows real class on your part. Early Camaros with their 5.0 engines had similar ratings, and were even slower. Don't you ever get tired of sounding stupid?!?
@marcomariaz26 When did I even mention a 5.0 in our discussion? Must be tiring ending your statements in the same fashion, it's sad how hard you're trying to defend your precious 5.0. By your logic, speed makes a car a better car, yet a fox 5 slow never won car of the year? The 305 camaro did, but yet GM makes worse cars, of course..
@miniz33 I haven't had this car for 17 years so who cares? It was quicker than most 305/350's in that genre, is all I'm saying. You mentioned 5.0 several times... WTF?? I also owned several other GM's and they were all crap, along with Ford...
fuck imports...we have all we need in american cars that we coul ask for. i mean u can go to 3800performance ( they wont let me put a web site on so i had to spell it out.) u could find stang parts all day in a groceery store. i have a 97 v8 sho tt that ive put ovr $10k into. anyone can mount a turbo on a paper weight. my brother hates ford wit a passion, this reminds me of r races in his 05 gtp wit heavy mods. i mean i have tt on a v8 loli wont race him any more, he always want to fight
my 93 is stock and I walk these slow ass things daily a guy I work with has a black gtp and his wifes green one and its a slaughter everytime he tries it and his car has pulleys intake exhaust and tune and he cant even come close even from a roll
I have a gtp and I have a 5.0 and along with what someone else said. Aftermarket heads,,, I doubt. I mean here is my mod list. e303cam afr 165 heads 1.7 RR tfs upper and lower intake mani, 3.73's and a tko tranny. Best 1/4 time on motor 12.21 and I cant drive worth crap. but love my gtp much more. Waiting for tax season to come, can we say whipple swap. Already went down to a 2.5, has headers, RRs cam ported blower, intercooled etc etc... cant wait
@Camaromandave98 I love how its like, bad to lose to it. It's a V6, supercharged. It's a V6, so it gains revs faster. It's SUPERCHARGED, which means immediate boost. And from what I've been reading, it only has intake, exhaust, and gears. Not that much considering its down 15hp stock for stock.
Yeah alot of things that people dont take into consider is the fact that that platform Is older. I have an 89 with A few mods and i keep up with new cars. Its kinda sad to be honest. Ford Has always done their homework.
kept right up with him tho...idk i would try a coupe 99 grand prix GTP or grand prix GTX vs the 5.0.. theyd prolly give the 5.0 a better run for its money...ive seen lots of vids of the 99 gtp beating a 5.0.
i dont know if i really see a 225 hp beating a 300+ SS, i mean its possible, but beings ive seen lots of vids of gtps beating 5.0s i cant see it, bc the gtp def couldnt beat the Impala SS. JUST SAYING. i hope your not one of those people who get all pissed off and flip out on youtube... just a thought. dont take it personal.
What Impalla SS are you talking about? I assume the V8 because the V6 sure doesn't have 300hp lol. if the V8 then it is most likely the Impala that will win, especially on the top end
yes the V8, the guy about me said his stock 5.0 beat his SS,i mean it is deff possible, but i just dont really know. the weight difference with the 5.0 being lighter, but idk..
TBH, The 87-93 foxbodies were not that fast STOCK... But you can mod them for cheap and make madddd power with the 5.0's... I had a 92 notchback 5.0 with Full exhaust, intake, Cobra intake mani, MSD, 3.55's, mild cam, c-4 trans, and ET streets and i was in the high 13's, The foxes only come with 225hp stock, i believe.
I agree... it may not be fast even in comparison to today's "sporty" sedans but 20 years ago it was a pretty quick and a pretty good package specially for the money.
I love Foxbodies, they aren't expensive, the parts aren't expensive either, and they are one of the best platforms to mod. What happened to yours? Got rid of it?
Indeed they are. My dad had a 93 cobra & i always wanted a stang so in august of 09 i bought one but had to keep dumping money into it due to oil leaks & $1,900 worth of parts to pass inspection.. then the transmission case cracked & i needed something more reliable so yeah, i sold it. I REGRET IT SO MUCH!!
Indeed, got to love the smog control of the 80s. Pretty much any v8 sports car back then could make some very nice gains with breathing and exhaust mods
@ICU55555 The competition wasn't faster at the time either. This generation Mustang was competing with Porsches and BMWs, and doing well. I think Ford could have easily gotten 300+RWHP from the 5.0, they've done it before, without EFI at that.
i destroyed a couple stock fox bodies in my 04 comp g gtp which is stock. they ran around 220 chp stock compared to the 260 chp and better gearing with the gtps
yep, sorry my supercharged SS would walk on this mustang no problem. mod for mod, it would not be the same sorry. forced induction wins that battle every time. stock for stock they'd be about even, but even the extra 2 cylinders on the 5.0 wouldnt matter when you mod a supercharged engine.
Aww poor little mustang fan is upset because he got owned. If that GTP had basic mods it would of walKed away from that Disgustang with ease. Would you like some proof of what a GTP could do with just Heads, Cam and NO tuning? I'll send you a link to a video.
Aww poor little GTP fan hit his head,because he's delusional if he thinks that would happen.Both cars built with equal mods,5.0 wins everytime.Thats a fact you'll never be able to dispute,rear wheel drive,lighter,more c.i.d.Sorry GTP,you lose.....
First of all a ford 302 in a foxbody with same mods as a 3.8l supercharged GTP,5.0 wins.PERIOD!!!Plus these cars are like decades apart in tech,but if the mods are the same,ford owns pontiac.I love it when little boys think there GTP's are fast.Time for a lesson little boy?
Dude this Mustang is nearly stock. There's a few videos of an '88 5.0 coupe with only bolt-on heads, cam, intake (with no porting) and gears running mid 12s @ 107 mph in 5000 ft DA. The car has done 12.30s @ 110. That's a stock 5.0 block with a $900 pair of Edelbrock heads, Ford Motorsport E-303 cam and Trickflow intake manifold, along with 3.73 gears. The rest of the entire car is bone stock. 5.0 Mustangs are about the best bang for your buck anywhere as can be realized by the fan base.
A GTP with a 3.4 setup, intake and exhaust here in Phoenix will barely get into the 14s. Seen it, have known ppl who have been there, done that. You could walk a stock 2003 GT by 10 lengths and then lose to another by 10 lengths. It's like that with any car. Cars are like people; their personalities develope based on experiences. Some Mustangs suck, others are rockets. Same with GTPs and every other car so lighten up already.
It depends what year the GTP is. I'm in tucson which has worse atmosperic pressure then phoenix and I did 14.78 bone stock, but I have a series 2 and it's a coupe. But still with a series 3 and a 3.4 pulley even a 4 door should be doing atleast high 14's...
@Bonettiman Yeah, with those mods he would have taken you pretty bad. But either way it def wasnt stock because you would have beat a stock fox. It def seems like an intake/exhaust/geared stang though. LOL love the finger, that was a funny touch. I do that to my buddies too.
@Xarmy187 The stock heads on that 5.0, and the 302 from the 1960s are completely different. The only thing that is the same is the block. The GT40 heads are from the 1960s though....
@Xarmy187 Sorry, my bad! The GT40 heads took inspiration from earlier designs, but were first used in the Explorer. Don't you have the videos of the red Convertible? Do you want to sell? Or trade for an 03 Cobra? Hate the supercharger whine, and I drive it daily.
@orbitofdoom16 yes my mustang is a 5.0 convertible that is pretty heavily modified. and no. I have no interest to sell or trade the car. I love it to much :)
@Xarmy187 Awwww, I had a 92 5.0 5 speed convertible that a tree fell on, I loved that car as much as some of the people I knew. Then I got a Cobra, I love the car, hate the whine
This car doesnt have aftermarket heads, if he does they are the gt40's, which also suck.. Ive had my share of foxbodies, with the head combo, this car is a high 13 second car in the vid.. thats about it..
I have an 05 GP COMp.G and they run mid to high 14 stock. Mine has cold air, ram air, getting exhaust and 180 tstat and will run def low 14s. the mustang should beat it since it has a lot of work done, but he barely got him.
My GP is identical. What people seem to forget is that the 04 GP is a 4 door sedan. It wasnt built to outrun mustangs. They are a totally different class of car. But at the same time that 04 GP does put down some respectable power. Get a full exaust with full CAI and you would easily run 14's or better. Then chip it and your heading into the mid 13's. GM really bottlenecked the 3800. Its still a nice mustang though
Those mustang 5.0 are slow as balls. Ive owned those things in my stock GXP. If that CompG were to get a DP, tune and intake and maybe go to 3.5 I think the mustang would have been flicking the CompG off instead.....
Yea that 5.0 did NOT have heads. Maybe he had a stage 1 port on the stock E7 heads, but he didn't have an aftermarket set of heads or any extensive head work. It sounded like a bone stock 5.0 to me, and I hang out at the Mustang meets every weekend. I can tell when someone has heads.
i have an 04 comp g i read some were that you can just jump down 2 a 3.4 pully with no other mods is this true and fu#k a mustang my ta will burn that thing
ok thanks for the heads up do u know what would be a good size to switch to. im new to the hole supercharged six banger thing im used to the v8 all motor power
if you are going to drop pulley sizes, you want to have some supporting mods first. I would recommend getting a cold air intake, 3 inch downpipe, colder spark plugs, PCM, and then you could run 3.6 or maybe a 3.5 pulley.
Comp G all the way : ) My 05 CompG is just about ready for a 3.6" pulley *sigh* I'm almost ready lol my mods are a wizaired cai, zzp pcm, and a 3" downpipe
My friend Andy has a stock-block 5.0L in his '91 notch. He has aftermarket heads and an aftermarket cam along with throttle body and intake manifold, headers and exhaust. The car has a stock bottom end and actually a stock intake pipe and filter. It's a 5 speed car with 3.73 gears. So basically it has the same mods the Mustang in this video supposedly does except for the cam and throttle body. The car runs 12.30s on Nitto street tires, i've watched it. This video is a joke and so is your comment
yes, and if the 5.0 hasn't been rebuilt then i'm sure with the mods listed hes just getting back to or slightly better than stock hp numbers. i think that fox was 15 years older. i liked the video though, some good races between friends.
OK,now change, cai,40$, pcm,100$, 3 in down pipe 250$ and 3.4 puley 50$,and you will have tom up this time. Look my video i have a gtp 98 with basic mods vs stang moded, more video to come this summer.
I'm referring to the "advice" you're giving. DO NOT go down to a 3.4 on a lightly modded GTP. A 3.5 on the GenV M90 is like a 3.4 for us GenIII M90 GTP's
stock to stock the grand prix would win but i still a good race i love them old fox body mustangs
gtptyler 2 weeks ago
Ugh that mustang is ugly as fuck.. I think the older models look better.That fox body looks goofy to me.
860125mwj 3 weeks ago
Why everyone talking about different or more upgrades? You could do alot to either one of there cars and make it stupid fast. I drive a 97 gtp which ran a 14.8 in 1/4 mile this summer with nothing but exaust and a K&N filter. I know with a 3.4 pully and a tune you can get gtps runnin 13's all day long. You could also do a few upgrades to the 5.0 and have it lifting the wheels off the ground on launch!
TheDrftkng 2 months ago
Def a stock mustang... anymore I don't even count gears as an upgrade because all new cars have a better set of gears already installed...the intake doesn't help a damn thing but look better...so the guy has a set of mufflers. It even sounds like it is running through the stock catted H pipe.
justlm69 2 months ago
Stock 5.0. I work tirelessly with these Mustangs, I can hear the sound difference between different heads. This 5.0 has stock heads. It's an intake/exhaust/gears car, that's it. A Comp G is a low 15 car @ 93 mph. My '92 convertible 5.0/5 speed with only pulleys and exhaust went 14.05 @ 97.5 mph on street tires. Nothing removed, still had spare tire and jack in the trunk, stock paper air filter etc, 3460 lbs race weight. A 5.0 with stock iron GT40s, stock cam, and GT40 intake traps ~103 mph.
gtdrummerdude 4 months ago
@gtdrummerdude I could see a low 15 from a comp G if it spins too much or at elevation. But my comp G at minnesota altitude ran 14.776@94.8 bone stock on street tires. Not up to par with your mustang, but with a pulley and intake or exhaust like your mustang has im pretty sure id pick up a few mph to be in that 97-98 area at least, not sure how much e.t. id pick up though if i stuck with street tires.
circlelt1 1 month ago
@circlelt1 Well shoot a pulley on your car is worth a little more than a pulley on mine lol whole different thing, I recently switched out the stock intake manifold on my car for one off a '99 Explorer. HUGE difference. I picked up an extra 600 rpm of powerband and 2 mph in the 1/4. Should be able to hit 100 mph with the intake mani, pulleys and exhaust only. Throw a 3.25 pulley and fuel mods at your car with intake and exhaust, it'll hit 100 easy.
gtdrummerdude 1 month ago
@gtdrummerdude Nice, yeah problem with the series-3 L67 is theyre more prone to KR. So, what would be like a "stage 1" for me would probably be only a 3.5/3.6 pulley, plugs, pcm, intake, dp, tune. 100mph is my goal aswell.
circlelt1 1 month ago
bone stock..all im gonna say..throw a 3.4 pulley, headers, and tune on the gtp and that ugly ass back grove lookin mustang will not win..
My94transam 4 months ago
GTP All most won. All you need is a racing cam then you win. On less the Mustang does more modds lol. Then you have to keep modding. O well good video anyway
Silkmaster4200 5 months ago
@Silkmaster4200 lol those mods dont even add that much HP, exhaust, intake are basically for sound and gears and heads by themselves only do so much if he even has any, plus that car is atleast 10 years older than the supercharged v6 i wouldnt be trying to brag lol
cMiiKEc 4 months ago
Comment removed
Silkmaster4200 5 months ago
the GTP was stock , if the Stang was stock it might be a different story. When i had my GTP i never raced a mustang , but im sure stock for stock, story might have a different outcome.
tylerjones1967 5 months ago
a GTP couldn't beat a 5.slow mustang? smh
The1995camaro 6 months ago
Mustang.... Nuff said
ChuginWindex34 9 months ago
@bonettiman lol your like "fuck you" but you were running stock so he had the advantage.but do you have any after market stuff on it yet?
smirf4472PS3 9 months ago
I bet it did have head work, the eighties to very early nineties 5.0 earned the name five slow for a reason. 175-225hp. Barely lighter and less powerful than a gtp, if it was relatively stock this would be an extermination, not a race. No disrespect, I've owned both.
miniz33 10 months ago
@miniz33 I owned a 1986 5.0 GT with 5-speed and I can tell you I used to SMOKE GM's up until 1989, when the 350's FINALLY made some decent power. The equivalent 5.0 from Chevy in the Camaro and Firebird were ZERO competition. I'd spot them 1.5 lengths at the light, and by 2nd/3rd gear shift, was passing them like they were just sitting there! Now put a chip on that 305 and it was close, and a chip on the 350 meant I lost, until I spent $1,200 on mods and ran 13.6@105. Bye, Bye GM!!
marcomariaz26 10 months ago
@marcomariaz26 Thats nice, Im not discussing the chevy 5.0. The 305 and 307 were the low end bastard childs of GM, I'm glad you could beat cars from the dark period of gm. You must be proud.
miniz33 10 months ago
@miniz33 I did mention 350's, but apparently you missed that one... Besides, that was a long time ago and I was just sayin'... I didn't consider the car a 'five slow' and if it was that slow, imagine what that says for GM if they consistently got smoked?? Talk about GM being a failure - no wonder the Gov't had to bail their sorry asses out and Ford didn't take dollar one... lol...
marcomariaz26 10 months ago
@marcomariaz26 Because your modded 5 0 beating stock firebirds (im sure) is totally a metaphor for how a multinational corporation operates nowadays. I've never owned a ford, with the exception of the 5 slow, thats lasted 10k miles without breaking down. GM's only issue was expanding into too many monikers and sub companies, guilty of being optimistic. Maybe
miniz33 10 months ago
@miniz33 You misunderstood me. When the '86 was bone stock, it took until '89 for the GM's to catch up. By then, my friend's 89 5.0 was dusting GM's. I've owned a GM since 1994, and can speak from experience they are not reliable. Same goes for Fords of the same genre. My 1992 Beretta was always having some issue and just before x-mas my 1996 Beretta died - broken camshaft. Never again will I own a GM, unless I have a mid-life crisis and get a Corvette or something impractical like that.
marcomariaz26 10 months ago
@marcomariaz26
A beretta, the cheapest end of chevys lineup is going to sully your opinion of a company, I can easily be as obtuse as to buy an escort or tempo and base my opinion on those. You're so badass in your 80's "high performance" cars, with all of 185 hp... All in all, nobody really cares if your 5.0 was "fast", people like you make me regret even owning one, 5.0s have as big of a douche bag following as BMW's, STIs, and lancer evos. One look at your channel left me feeling gratified
miniz33 10 months ago
@miniz33 Actually, the Cavalier was cheaper!! What car had 185hp?? The Mustang had 200 stock, 270 when I was done with it. All American cars blew goats in terms of reliability from the 70's until the 2000's. If you don't know this, you're delusional. Now, yes, GM and Ford can finally make a decent car, but it's too little, too late for this American. Glad to hear you 'gratified' yourself while on YouTube... LOL...
marcomariaz26 10 months ago
@marcomariaz26 Early model five slows had that pitiful amount of power, I'm glad you agree your beloved fords certainly blew ass. I certainly felt gratified in my argument with one look at you, you douchebag.
miniz33 10 months ago
@miniz33 Nice to get personal. Shows real class on your part. Early Camaros with their 5.0 engines had similar ratings, and were even slower. Don't you ever get tired of sounding stupid?!?
Talk about a 'douchebag'... lmfao...
marcomariaz26 10 months ago
@marcomariaz26 When did I even mention a 5.0 in our discussion? Must be tiring ending your statements in the same fashion, it's sad how hard you're trying to defend your precious 5.0. By your logic, speed makes a car a better car, yet a fox 5 slow never won car of the year? The 305 camaro did, but yet GM makes worse cars, of course..
I'm talking a "douche bag'...lmfao...
miniz33 10 months ago
@miniz33 I haven't had this car for 17 years so who cares? It was quicker than most 305/350's in that genre, is all I'm saying. You mentioned 5.0 several times... WTF?? I also owned several other GM's and they were all crap, along with Ford...
marcomariaz26 10 months ago
i have a 04 gtp and its quick af, but it has such long gears and it sometimes hurts me sometimes
dumbf7y 1 year ago
fuck imports...we have all we need in american cars that we coul ask for. i mean u can go to 3800performance ( they wont let me put a web site on so i had to spell it out.) u could find stang parts all day in a groceery store. i have a 97 v8 sho tt that ive put ovr $10k into. anyone can mount a turbo on a paper weight. my brother hates ford wit a passion, this reminds me of r races in his 05 gtp wit heavy mods. i mean i have tt on a v8 loli wont race him any more, he always want to fight
97shobra 1 year ago
The GTP won at 1:03
str8lucks2000GT 1 year ago
my 93 is stock and I walk these slow ass things daily a guy I work with has a black gtp and his wifes green one and its a slaughter everytime he tries it and his car has pulleys intake exhaust and tune and he cant even come close even from a roll
Mr5pointO 1 year ago
You cant beat the 5.0 in third gear .
0r0bin 1 year ago
@0r0bin hell yeah my 3rd gear is NASTY with 435 rwhp
lowrider121990 1 year ago
notch ftw lol
jclarkesbcglobal 1 year ago
@ scootergtp, your an idiot fox bodies are 79-93s trust me iv owned 3, the 86 gt, 91gt with chevy 400 swap, and the 93 lx 5.0 I own now
Mr5pointO 1 year ago
sorry that is not a foxbody hello!!!
scootergtp 1 year ago
Flowmasters are most likely about all he has done to the stang.. lol
Burnz2much 1 year ago
I miss my fox
MrShootnmove 1 year ago
I have a gtp and I have a 5.0 and along with what someone else said. Aftermarket heads,,, I doubt. I mean here is my mod list. e303cam afr 165 heads 1.7 RR tfs upper and lower intake mani, 3.73's and a tko tranny. Best 1/4 time on motor 12.21 and I cant drive worth crap. but love my gtp much more. Waiting for tax season to come, can we say whipple swap. Already went down to a 2.5, has headers, RRs cam ported blower, intercooled etc etc... cant wait
cheezeytots69 1 year ago
1990 gt with headers and it rapes so i can see how this one does what it does. Its a nice sound from the inside when you gas it too :)
rockstick 1 year ago
just barely faster........that what happens when u mess with pontiac, the fox is lucky he wasnt messin with a firebird
prozack678 1 year ago
@prozack678 UH? Pretty sure the mustang was pulling and slowed down?
lowrider121990 1 year ago
@lowrider121990 If he kept going he would have been GONE
lowrider121990 1 year ago
its fkn embarassing for the mustang that a stock GTP jumps him when
they start racing if the
GTP had the same stuff that the mustang did the GTP will rape the shit out of it
damian41231 1 year ago
that was a good year for mustang :) all mustangs own tho haha:)
MrHawkeyethe2nd 1 year ago
shits weak....
PheyuckYu 1 year ago
@Camaromandave98 AMEN
Prank6767 1 year ago
damn foxbodys are my fav btw lmao when he gave him a finger
MUSTANGMAN50LX 1 year ago
@Camaromandave98 I love how its like, bad to lose to it. It's a V6, supercharged. It's a V6, so it gains revs faster. It's SUPERCHARGED, which means immediate boost. And from what I've been reading, it only has intake, exhaust, and gears. Not that much considering its down 15hp stock for stock.
Shomelife 1 year ago
Yeah alot of things that people dont take into consider is the fact that that platform Is older. I have an 89 with A few mods and i keep up with new cars. Its kinda sad to be honest. Ford Has always done their homework.
xtreme3484 1 year ago
I think there biggest attribute is that they are so so light
unconfinedx 1 year ago
I say BS, show me the proof
footballplaya3k 1 year ago
kept right up with him tho...idk i would try a coupe 99 grand prix GTP or grand prix GTX vs the 5.0.. theyd prolly give the 5.0 a better run for its money...ive seen lots of vids of the 99 gtp beating a 5.0.
tyl3rjon3s 1 year ago
You guys are awesome. You should all be professional mechanics and hot rodders. Sooo smart. Fuckin Chevy baby.
codyLT1ss 2 years ago
that fox looked pretty stock the way it ran.....my stock fox outruns my stock 04 impala ss by about as much as this guy one by
ClayAbernathy 2 years ago
i dont know if i really see a 225 hp beating a 300+ SS, i mean its possible, but beings ive seen lots of vids of gtps beating 5.0s i cant see it, bc the gtp def couldnt beat the Impala SS. JUST SAYING. i hope your not one of those people who get all pissed off and flip out on youtube... just a thought. dont take it personal.
tyl3rjon3s 1 year ago
@tyl3rjon3s
What Impalla SS are you talking about? I assume the V8 because the V6 sure doesn't have 300hp lol. if the V8 then it is most likely the Impala that will win, especially on the top end
footballplaya3k 1 year ago
yes the V8, the guy about me said his stock 5.0 beat his SS,i mean it is deff possible, but i just dont really know. the weight difference with the 5.0 being lighter, but idk..
tyl3rjon3s 1 year ago
@tyl3rjon3s
If you're talking about this mustang I see no way it beat a 300hp V8 SS, whether its the GP or Impala.
footballplaya3k 1 year ago
yeah thats what i said.. but the guy: ClayAbernathy: said his STOCK mustang beat a 300 hp SS..
tyl3rjon3s 1 year ago
@tyl3rjon3s Yeahh, I'm a major ford guy. And I own a 1990 mustang. I can honestly say there's no way he's beating a 300hp SS stock.
Shomelife 1 year ago
@tyl3rjon3s you guys fail reading comprehension. He said his 04 impala SS i.e. series 2 3.8 SC V6 w/240hp.
lurch1489 11 months ago
nice finger salute. i HATE mustangs. they are the new honda
NUNPUNCHER714 2 years ago
they hate you too
TheRagAss 2 years ago
@TheRagAss only because im faster.
NUNPUNCHER714 2 years ago
haha how do you figure?
TheRagAss 2 years ago
Thats a first
anarchistbot 2 years ago
TBH, The 87-93 foxbodies were not that fast STOCK... But you can mod them for cheap and make madddd power with the 5.0's... I had a 92 notchback 5.0 with Full exhaust, intake, Cobra intake mani, MSD, 3.55's, mild cam, c-4 trans, and ET streets and i was in the high 13's, The foxes only come with 225hp stock, i believe.
ICU55555 2 years ago
lol thats not very fast... do equivalent mods to a GTP and you will be seeing high 12s.
lurch1489 2 years ago
Your right, its not that fast... but it was pretty good price wise for the amount of power it made. ya know?
ICU55555 2 years ago
I agree... it may not be fast even in comparison to today's "sporty" sedans but 20 years ago it was a pretty quick and a pretty good package specially for the money.
Bonettiman 2 years ago
I love Foxbodies, they aren't expensive, the parts aren't expensive either, and they are one of the best platforms to mod. What happened to yours? Got rid of it?
Bonettiman 2 years ago
Indeed they are. My dad had a 93 cobra & i always wanted a stang so in august of 09 i bought one but had to keep dumping money into it due to oil leaks & $1,900 worth of parts to pass inspection.. then the transmission case cracked & i needed something more reliable so yeah, i sold it. I REGRET IT SO MUCH!!
ICU55555 2 years ago
@ICU55555
Indeed, got to love the smog control of the 80s. Pretty much any v8 sports car back then could make some very nice gains with breathing and exhaust mods
etb4u 1 year ago
@ICU55555 The competition wasn't faster at the time either. This generation Mustang was competing with Porsches and BMWs, and doing well. I think Ford could have easily gotten 300+RWHP from the 5.0, they've done it before, without EFI at that.
orbitofdoom16 1 year ago
@ICU55555 You had all those mods and only came out to a high 13!?
GrantEvanGriffith 1 year ago
@GrantEvanGriffith He is obviously making it up as he google's "mustangs are cool" lol.. kids nowadays.. (sigh)
Burnz2much 1 year ago
@ICU55555
High 13's with all of that, you know they run 14.3 stock? Fail..
x42bnx 1 year ago
ROFL.. thats right give him the finger... LOL
evilperson86u 2 years ago 9
haha thats it for that big ass engine???
beatstork 2 years ago
Doesn't look like the mustang has any mods either... Those earlier mustangs are fast.
JuggaloOfLove 2 years ago
i destroyed a couple stock fox bodies in my 04 comp g gtp which is stock. they ran around 220 chp stock compared to the 260 chp and better gearing with the gtps
scopapa33 2 years ago
That mustang obviously has 500,000 miles on it to be that slow with those mods.
83Dieselranger 2 years ago
yep, sorry my supercharged SS would walk on this mustang no problem. mod for mod, it would not be the same sorry. forced induction wins that battle every time. stock for stock they'd be about even, but even the extra 2 cylinders on the 5.0 wouldnt matter when you mod a supercharged engine.
kcchiefs15 2 years ago
that 5.0 did not have aftermarket heads. PERIOD.
almost any aftermarket head will net a 5.0 30-40horsepower at the wheel because the stock head's where designed in the 60's for TRUCKS.
Xarmy187 2 years ago 2
The owner must've been BS'ing about the heads then. Still, it was enough to get me up top.
Bonettiman 2 years ago
No biggie. GTP's are pretty quick car's. But a bone stock GTP would be killed by bus length's by a H/C/I fox.
a h/c/i 5.0 should be in the low 13's high 12's with little effort as long as the guy can drive.
Xarmy187 2 years ago
And a Heads, Cam, IC'ed GTP will be high 11's. 5.0 mustangs are still slower than snail shit.
V3rzGTP 2 years ago
lol, keep telling yourself that :)
Xarmy187 2 years ago
Aww poor little mustang fan is upset because he got owned. If that GTP had basic mods it would of walKed away from that Disgustang with ease. Would you like some proof of what a GTP could do with just Heads, Cam and NO tuning? I'll send you a link to a video.
V3rzGTP 2 years ago
Aww poor little GTP fan hit his head,because he's delusional if he thinks that would happen.Both cars built with equal mods,5.0 wins everytime.Thats a fact you'll never be able to dispute,rear wheel drive,lighter,more c.i.d.Sorry GTP,you lose.....
steelchoice 2 years ago
Lol why does a stock GTP walk a stock 5.slo then you little mama's boy? Your Disgustang is a disgrace and always will be.
V3rzGTP 2 years ago
First of all a ford 302 in a foxbody with same mods as a 3.8l supercharged GTP,5.0 wins.PERIOD!!!Plus these cars are like decades apart in tech,but if the mods are the same,ford owns pontiac.I love it when little boys think there GTP's are fast.Time for a lesson little boy?
steelchoice 2 years ago
Lol hate to break it to ya douche, but mod for mod the GTP owns your gay little disgustang.
V3rzGTP 2 years ago
ok how about il put a grand in my gtp and you put a grand in your foxbody...gaurentee id win... gotta love cheap hp =0
xxxpingzing18xxx 2 years ago
if they arebuilt with equal mods and the 5.0 would win, how come here the 5.0 has mods and still loses to stock GTP?
rob16875 2 years ago
Dude this Mustang is nearly stock. There's a few videos of an '88 5.0 coupe with only bolt-on heads, cam, intake (with no porting) and gears running mid 12s @ 107 mph in 5000 ft DA. The car has done 12.30s @ 110. That's a stock 5.0 block with a $900 pair of Edelbrock heads, Ford Motorsport E-303 cam and Trickflow intake manifold, along with 3.73 gears. The rest of the entire car is bone stock. 5.0 Mustangs are about the best bang for your buck anywhere as can be realized by the fan base.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
A GTP with a 3.4 setup, intake and exhaust here in Phoenix will barely get into the 14s. Seen it, have known ppl who have been there, done that. You could walk a stock 2003 GT by 10 lengths and then lose to another by 10 lengths. It's like that with any car. Cars are like people; their personalities develope based on experiences. Some Mustangs suck, others are rockets. Same with GTPs and every other car so lighten up already.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
It depends what year the GTP is. I'm in tucson which has worse atmosperic pressure then phoenix and I did 14.78 bone stock, but I have a series 2 and it's a coupe. But still with a series 3 and a 3.4 pulley even a 4 door should be doing atleast high 14's...
TiKondaRoga 2 years ago
Well the one I watched last saturday night was doing low 15s all night. What was your mph?
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
My 1/4 mph? Or did you mean mpg? My 1/4 mph is in the 93mph-96mph
TiKondaRoga 2 years ago
@Bonettiman Yeah, with those mods he would have taken you pretty bad. But either way it def wasnt stock because you would have beat a stock fox. It def seems like an intake/exhaust/geared stang though. LOL love the finger, that was a funny touch. I do that to my buddies too.
bbrewer5 1 year ago
@Xarmy187 The stock heads on that 5.0, and the 302 from the 1960s are completely different. The only thing that is the same is the block. The GT40 heads are from the 1960s though....
orbitofdoom16 1 year ago
@orbitofdoom16 re-read what you just posted.
the gt40 heads did not show up until the mid 90's
Xarmy187 1 year ago
@Xarmy187 Sorry, my bad! The GT40 heads took inspiration from earlier designs, but were first used in the Explorer. Don't you have the videos of the red Convertible? Do you want to sell? Or trade for an 03 Cobra? Hate the supercharger whine, and I drive it daily.
orbitofdoom16 1 year ago
@orbitofdoom16 yes my mustang is a 5.0 convertible that is pretty heavily modified. and no. I have no interest to sell or trade the car. I love it to much :)
Xarmy187 1 year ago
@Xarmy187 Awwww, I had a 92 5.0 5 speed convertible that a tree fell on, I loved that car as much as some of the people I knew. Then I got a Cobra, I love the car, hate the whine
orbitofdoom16 1 year ago
Good race!
ceetwarrior 2 years ago
This car doesnt have aftermarket heads, if he does they are the gt40's, which also suck.. Ive had my share of foxbodies, with the head combo, this car is a high 13 second car in the vid.. thats about it..
oubrew1 2 years ago
I have an 05 GP COMp.G and they run mid to high 14 stock. Mine has cold air, ram air, getting exhaust and 180 tstat and will run def low 14s. the mustang should beat it since it has a lot of work done, but he barely got him.
Vantage08 2 years ago
My GP is identical. What people seem to forget is that the 04 GP is a 4 door sedan. It wasnt built to outrun mustangs. They are a totally different class of car. But at the same time that 04 GP does put down some respectable power. Get a full exaust with full CAI and you would easily run 14's or better. Then chip it and your heading into the mid 13's. GM really bottlenecked the 3800. Its still a nice mustang though
XerXesSRT 2 years ago
that winsor put it downn boii!!
allmightyjamestown 2 years ago
Those mustang 5.0 are slow as balls. Ive owned those things in my stock GXP. If that CompG were to get a DP, tune and intake and maybe go to 3.5 I think the mustang would have been flicking the CompG off instead.....
GXPFiend 2 years ago
LOL, 5.0's are slow? Since when? At least they have 2 doors like a real "sports" car has. Oh, and a manual transmission so the car doesn't drive YOU.
ceetwarrior 2 years ago
Just saying I raced one and it got OWNED....to me there SL()VV.
GXPFiend 2 years ago
stock they are slow....215HP to be exact...5.0's are only good if you build them up.
by the way alot of drag racers use automatics because they shift faster than any human will
prowler10393 2 years ago
the main reason for using the auto in drag racing is time consistency
funkbuster 2 years ago
I have a 2.8 pulley on my GP GT...seriously.
3800GTV6 2 years ago
He prolly meant headERS.
Rob3800GT 2 years ago
Comp G has a nice pull to it.
Chumlend 2 years ago
Yea that 5.0 did NOT have heads. Maybe he had a stage 1 port on the stock E7 heads, but he didn't have an aftermarket set of heads or any extensive head work. It sounded like a bone stock 5.0 to me, and I hang out at the Mustang meets every weekend. I can tell when someone has heads.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
Damn nice vid man keep it up you should put some more vids like this one up.
aypllepay 2 years ago
i have an 04 comp g i read some were that you can just jump down 2 a 3.4 pully with no other mods is this true and fu#k a mustang my ta will burn that thing
thekidd7885 2 years ago
if you want to chip a piston, then yeah you could do that lol
lurch1489 2 years ago
ok thanks for the heads up do u know what would be a good size to switch to. im new to the hole supercharged six banger thing im used to the v8 all motor power
thekidd7885 2 years ago
if you are going to drop pulley sizes, you want to have some supporting mods first. I would recommend getting a cold air intake, 3 inch downpipe, colder spark plugs, PCM, and then you could run 3.6 or maybe a 3.5 pulley.
lurch1489 2 years ago
Comp G all the way : ) My 05 CompG is just about ready for a 3.6" pulley *sigh* I'm almost ready lol my mods are a wizaired cai, zzp pcm, and a 3" downpipe
SLoBRoDTP 2 years ago
I bet you I could give your friend a good race lol that is if he still has the same mods
SLoBRoDTP 2 years ago
is there any difference between a regular 04 gtp and an 04 gtp comp g?
gtpjoe4 2 years ago
yeah the gtp compg has better gearing, suspension, brakes, and it comes with paddleshifters
SLoBRoDTP 2 years ago
shit that 5.0 beat the shit out of the gtp...
that guy was mad because he got beaten by a 5.0 thats why he throw him the finger... cheap bastard...
teamshortfuse 3 years ago
What an idiot... the guy in the Mustang is my friend, I was just joking.
Bonettiman 3 years ago
lol it was obvious hes your bud. but, he needs to do some paintwork on that poor fox lol
3kgtluvr 2 years ago
I hope all of you understand now why they call them 5.slo's
V3rzGTP 3 years ago
5.slow Rustang FTL
3800GTV6 3 years ago
i agree all those mods done to that piece of shit and it is still garabge slap a 3.5 on that comp g and say bye!
I3RIZZ 2 years ago
My friend Andy has a stock-block 5.0L in his '91 notch. He has aftermarket heads and an aftermarket cam along with throttle body and intake manifold, headers and exhaust. The car has a stock bottom end and actually a stock intake pipe and filter. It's a 5 speed car with 3.73 gears. So basically it has the same mods the Mustang in this video supposedly does except for the cam and throttle body. The car runs 12.30s on Nitto street tires, i've watched it. This video is a joke and so is your comment
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
YES SIR. Fuckin joke lol omg a GPrix "STOCK" vs a 5.0 HCI lol cmon guys use your fucking heads.
Pitbellzer 2 years ago
5.0L needs the driver mod.
3.8L needs an FWI, a DP, and a tune, and it would be walking away from that 5.0L
A 3.4'' pulley on a Gen V on stock manifolds? Ha! Maybe if you want to be knocking all the time.
rm125 3 years ago
balls slow for the 5.0. the comp g kept up with it pretty well AND IT WAS STOCK LMAO
arre420 3 years ago
yes, and if the 5.0 hasn't been rebuilt then i'm sure with the mods listed hes just getting back to or slightly better than stock hp numbers. i think that fox was 15 years older. i liked the video though, some good races between friends.
JGarner89 2 years ago
Gotta love the 5.0's ! :-)
stangcrazygirl 3 years ago
OK,now change, cai,40$, pcm,100$, 3 in down pipe 250$ and 3.4 puley 50$,and you will have tom up this time. Look my video i have a gtp 98 with basic mods vs stang moded, more video to come this summer.
fursol 3 years ago
Maybe a 3.4 on an older GTP, but a 3.4 on a Comp-G and you're beggin' for some serious KR
ninny404 3 years ago
Mistake mine is 98 so pulley3.4 for Comp-G 3.5 lollll
fursol 3 years ago
I'm referring to the "advice" you're giving. DO NOT go down to a 3.4 on a lightly modded GTP. A 3.5 on the GenV M90 is like a 3.4 for us GenIII M90 GTP's
ninny404 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your right man.
fursol 3 years ago