Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
I agree - it appears that Carol Thatcher is defiant in her use of a racial slur and has no intention of apologising, or admitting she was wrong. Richard Herring is a hero for trying to make her see reason - but agreed; it should have been Matthew Wright that led that discussion.
samelajane 3 years ago 5
It's only a racial slur if you intend to offend a black person. Clearly carol didn't mean it that way.
tkwolfcub 3 years ago
Of course it's a racial slur. Would she have used it to describe a white person?
samelajane 3 years ago 4
No but the doll isn't white is it.
Anyway Carol only said the persons hair style looked like a gollywogs she didn't call the person and gollywog which would have been a racial slur.
tkwolfcub 3 years ago
From what I see, Carol Thatcher see's herself as a victim when she made a comment most people would find offensive.
She's irrational, and clearly lacks any emotional intelligence. I'm also disappointed in Matthew Wright for not taking her to task over her comment, because broadcast or not what she said was in a place of work.
Scarr 3 years ago 11