Click Dartmouth Films to watch the new trailer for 'The Flaw' which is David Sington's new film. David is the director of 'In the Shadow of the Moon'.
The reason they had to fake the moon landings was probably space radiation. The theory is that Van Allen started working for NASA and changed his position. To see an article about Van Allen, google "Volconvo forum". The moon thread is in the "Science and Technology" section. The article and other stuff about space radiation are on page 17 in posts #326 and #327.
@Cosmored Dr. Van Allen himself (who last time i checked is still alive) has gone on record many times saying such theories are bullshit. The Van Allen radiation belts are simply too weak. Are the astronauts at higher risk for cancer, probably. But it's no where near the "being cooked alive" that most hoaxers seem to believe.
Sorry, but i'm going to take what the accredited, published, highly trained/knowledgeable scientists from around the world say over what a crackpot website says any day. FACT is they did receive a large dose or radiation. But it was no more than what a person in the nuclear power field can safely receive in a year (about the same a a couple of chest x-rays).
pt2. In fact the Van Allen theory is more proof that we did go to the moon as the majority of the Apollo astronauts have developed cataracts. Which is proven to be caused by large radiation dosages. Also several have died from cancer.
The sources in which i trust are independently paid scientists. As well as being some of the smartest people alive. The sources in which you trust is some guy sitting at a computer in his basement all day long.
You seem to be trying to sway people who haven't linked the the info. Anyone who actually reads it will know you're full of it. Do you think Jay Windley might be a lying sellout?
This has been flagged as spam show
Click Dartmouth Films to watch the new trailer for 'The Flaw' which is David Sington's new film. David is the director of 'In the Shadow of the Moon'.
DartmouthFilms 1 year ago
The reason they had to fake the moon landings was probably space radiation. The theory is that Van Allen started working for NASA and changed his position. To see an article about Van Allen, google "Volconvo forum". The moon thread is in the "Science and Technology" section. The article and other stuff about space radiation are on page 17 in posts #326 and #327.
Cosmored 2 years ago
You are an idiot. Go play in traffic.
PsychoCheese1337 2 years ago
@Cosmored Dr. Van Allen himself (who last time i checked is still alive) has gone on record many times saying such theories are bullshit. The Van Allen radiation belts are simply too weak. Are the astronauts at higher risk for cancer, probably. But it's no where near the "being cooked alive" that most hoaxers seem to believe.
salemcripple 2 years ago
The theory is that Van Allen bent to pressure from NASA and changed his stand.
3W's (dot) buzzcreek (dot) com/grade-a/MOON/articles1 (dot) htm
/watch?v=f2rotplZn0g
(YouTube)
3W's (dot) thenakedscientists (dot) com/forum/index (dot) php?topic=232 (dot) msg280389#msg280389
(Check links for gaps)
Cosmored 2 years ago
Sorry, but i'm going to take what the accredited, published, highly trained/knowledgeable scientists from around the world say over what a crackpot website says any day. FACT is they did receive a large dose or radiation. But it was no more than what a person in the nuclear power field can safely receive in a year (about the same a a couple of chest x-rays).
salemcripple 2 years ago
pt2. In fact the Van Allen theory is more proof that we did go to the moon as the majority of the Apollo astronauts have developed cataracts. Which is proven to be caused by large radiation dosages. Also several have died from cancer.
salemcripple 2 years ago
"Sorry, but i'm going to take what the accredited, published, highly trained/knowledgeable scientists from around the world say...chest x-rays)."
The sources of information which you trust so much are under tight control. Here's some info about that.
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showpost (dot) php?p=4094312&postcount=700
(check link for gaps)
Cosmored 2 years ago
The sources in which i trust are independently paid scientists. As well as being some of the smartest people alive. The sources in which you trust is some guy sitting at a computer in his basement all day long.
salemcripple 2 years ago
"The sources in...basement all day long."
You seem to be trying to sway people who haven't linked the the info. Anyone who actually reads it will know you're full of it. Do you think Jay Windley might be a lying sellout?
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showpost (dot) php?p=4088717&postcount=684
(check link for gaps)
Cosmored 2 years ago
The evidence shows that the moon missions were faked.
s1 (dot) zetaboards (dot) com/LooseChangeForums/topic/51606/1/
s1 (dot) zetaboards (dot) com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=48603&t=51606
(Check links for gaps)
Cosmored 3 years ago
Like anyone would believe anything from the Loose Stools forums. Hoaxtards!
Synthetrix 2 years ago
So you also think 9/11 wasn't an inside job. Here are some videos for you to watch.
3W's (dot) question911 (dot) com/linksall (dot) htm
video (dot) google (dot) com/videoplay?docid=-8989407671184881047
(check links for gaps)
Do a YouTube search on "MoonFaker" for more on the Apollo hoax.
Cosmored 2 years ago
I have seen all the CT propaganda and none of it holds up to scrutiny.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
I really liked the book too, it went well with the movie.
OasisShmoasis 3 years ago 3
nice one!
incremental9 3 years ago 4