How about this. Finding a planet that is just right for humans doesn't mean that it's right for some types of aliens in the universe. Such as some type of aliens can only live on a super cold planet and can't live on a planet that is just right for humans...
So humans, stop trying to find a planet that is perfect for a human, but say a planet that is perfect for some living things...
Example of human denying existences of another life is like a person living in the middle of desert inside a dark cave which he never left in his life ...believes he is alone on this planet by just looking through a tiny peep hole for couple of second
I hope we'll find evidence of life within the next two decades. There will be next generation spacetelescopes (like JWST) which will be able to find even more information about these planets. I know other life is out there. It's just waiting to be discovered.
thats funny how she is like, 'if you have a really nice camera, you have 10 mega pixels' and then the guy says, 'kepler has 96 MILLION pixels'.... ummm thats 96 mega pixels
#1.Keplar will find what portion of the area your looking at in the sky that has planets of a certain size =So they can narrow it down to our size planets
#2.James webb will find certain temptures in planets that have water an the age of the planet = Goldilocks zone that allows our type of life
#3.Hubble= will show optical pictures of what shapes an colors planets are=like google earth like views the planets structure an life
On 2 February 2011, the Kepler team announced the results from the data of May to September 2009. They found 1235 planetary candidates circling 997 host stars, more than twice the number of currently known exoplanets. This haul included 68 planetary candidates of Earth-like size and 54 planetary candidates in the habitable zone of their star. They estimate that 6% of stars host Earth-size planets and 19% of all stars have multiple planets.
there are things on our planet that dont require water or oxigen so why would it be needed for life on other planets the answer is simple it wouldnt be.
@Helge129 RIIIIIGGGHHHHTTT buddy, just because you are not aware of the found life for there are more then a couple things on Earth that do not require light water or oxygen. You should do some research or at least not answer blindly to things you just asume.......
@rgrggfdgfgr You can have life without light, and without oxygen, but not without water, because water is the only molecule capable of the complex biochemical reactions you need.
@Helge129 That didnt even meen anything, Make a real point I'm sure what you just said was incorrect and ignorant I'm even willing to bet you just made up a false point ,That or you're REALLY dumb....
And then maybe you can explain all the life we know about that dosnt need water.......
Don't wright me again you should maybe do some research. I've got better things to do eatherway.
@rgrggfdgfgr I remember having seen some documentary some years ago that there were found some bacteria that was found in a cavernous system deprived from water and oxygen.
@rgrggfdgfgr wow, not to be a prick here but you really ought to learn how to spell before you go about questioning other peoples intelligence. its pretty hard to take your comments seriously when you can`t even spell simple words like(meen) mean,(dosnt)doesn't and(eatherway) either way(two words not one). my 7 year old has a better grasp on how to spell, or so it would seem.
@abetterplayer Why even use worthless paper money ? that only limits what we can accomplish and creates imbalances in power. What we need is a resource based economy
I'm always chocked that people say that the life can only happen in a planete as earth.... everytime I want to tell them that that is wrong. the life AS WE KNOW is only possible on planetes like earth....
@EPiiCxPwn yeah you wouldnt believe me me if i tried, theres things going on behind closed doors that would blow your mind.... do some reasearch, you have to understand our tech is so advanced, we had free energy 50 years back, anti gravity etc ... its a sick lie we live in.
@mariahandchristina don't give up hope. I think we'll find evidence for some form of life on another planet within a decade. We will have the new bigger observatories and better technology for analyzing the spectrum of extra solar planet atmospheres by then.
Surely most stars we can see don't even exist anymore due to the amount of time it takes for light to travel to our earth. How do they know if they are looking at a living star, or an extinct stars light which is now only reaching us billions of years later.
@speedtab Aside of maybe Betelgeuse, most stars we can see with the naked eye still exist. Most of the stars (the furthest being I think 80k lighyears roughly) still exist. 100,000 years is nothing in the life of most but the largest of stars.
eww whos idea was it to puts pictures of columbus when the lady is likening them to early explorers. I guess they deserve to be dismembered and fed to a spider too.
if aliens do exist and they are thousands of years more advanced than us, I wonder if they went about finding planets and taking trips to their moon when they're technology was in its infancy like us. Maybe they had a country that was a super power on their planet that could afford tho do such things??? maybe there is a flag on a moon orbiting a planet and maybe its not even in this galaxy. the universe truly is amazing, i find it hard to put my expressions into words about the possibilities
@IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY Yes, but maybe aliens are just not interested in the universe. Or, they may live in a planet covered with very dense clouds (like Titan or Venus) blocking the view of sky during millions of years, or the can be underwater creatures... What I mean is that we always suposse that aliens are curious like the humans are, but it is possible too that they dont care about the rest of the universe.
@T0R0YD Usually if an animal is intelligent, it will also have curiosity.
Most people don't realize it's not about complex life, if we just find a single set of bacteria on an "alien planet" then that will be the greatest discovery known to man-kind.
Too bad NASA has such a reputation for lying. It's unfortunate because I would like to believe what they are saying here, however 30 years of wasted trips to a space station which has produced not a single interesting scientific discovery leads me to believe they are liars. We know they found ancient artifacts on the Moon 40 years ago yet they still deny it.
If we're planning to move on to new planets just to end up killing them like we're killing beautiful Earth, I hope we NEVER make it to a new planet. I'm pretty sure we wont in time. :) The universe will be happy and so will I.
@KhPharos Eat less. You lower your metabolism, your cells divide slower, it takes longer for the telomeres in your DNA to wear down, and therefore longer before your cells start destroying themselves.
The transit method of detecting planets is analogous to looking at your watch face in a dark room. You cannot see the second hand but detect it when it passes in front of the luminous dots.
any one who exist in this planet should account for earth destruction. i think it would be fair enough for mother earth to decide what shall she do for the incoming years. i was just curious bout the facts written on science books, they told us there were other planets, here is mars, venus, blah blah blah, but how will i believe if i havent seen them in reality? do u think this mission shows truth or lies? how would we know it?
@1961arnie It's possible, just not very likely. As I said, though, even if a rocky planet were to develop in the habitable zone of say, Rigel, it's very unlikely life would ever evolve there - if the history of life on Earth is any indication. It took several hundred million years before the earliest single-celled organisms began to appear here; multicellular life needed more than 3 billion years. Stars like Rigel just won't last long enough for any of that to happen.
@1961arnie I may have misunderstood your last post, if your comment on my channel is anything to go by. I was indicating that giant stars are unlikely to harbour worlds with life. There are billions upon billions of Sun-like stars in the galaxy which could very well have the right conditions for life to evolve and the necessary longevity for it to flourish. So, don't despair - I'm sure the pattern of life on this planet has occurred time and time again on a multitude of worlds.
Not very long. As I said, massive stars live fast and die young. Rigel, Betelgeuse, Deneb etc have lifetimes in the order of a few million years. Betelgeuse is estimated to have been around for about 8 million years tops, and yet is already in its death throes.
Sirius is believed to be about 250 million years old. It won't burn out as quickly as the supermassive stars mentioned above, but it's still limited to a lifetime of around 1 billion years (a mere tenth of the Sun's longevity).
@1961arnie They can have planets, though it's less likely. Massive stars have far more powerful stellar winds, causing their dust disks (the material around a new-born star out of which planets accrete) to be rapidly blown away. A handful of planets have been found around giant stars, though, so it is possible.
Unfortunately, even if a rocky planet developed in the habitable zone, it would have a grim future. Massive stars burn out and die very quickly, precluding complex life from evolving.
@1961arnie A little less than the orbit of Jupiter, yes. But Sirius has other problems that make it a poor candidate for hosting life, such as the fact that it puts out much more hard radiation than Sol, and the presence of its companion star, Sirius B, which would probably disrupt the orbits of any planets there significantly.
Larger stars would have a very distant (and wide) HZ: Arcturus' would be about 11 AU, for example. But like Sirius, they are not good candidates for a slew of reasons.
maybe you don't understand what I'm talking about ok i try again you can't earth around a Canis Major at 93 million miles the distance between us and the sun; how far wold a earth like planet have to be away from Canis major in order to have water and an atmosphere
@1961arnie The habitable zone is relative to the star. It's usually defined as being the region around a star where water would comfortably exist in a liquid state on the surface of a rocky planet. So you are indeed correct that an Earth-like planet would not be possible around Sirius (luminosity = 25x Sun) at 1 AU. Instead, it would have to orbit at around 4.5 AU to receive the same level of insolation that the Earth does around the Sun.
Guauuuuuuuuuuuu y a mi que me creian LOCO cuando niño decia de alguna foma estas ideas que no estamos solo y que afuera podria estar nuestra respuesta y 100-pre edicho que mi lugar no es aqui esta en alguna estrellita en ese universo algundia medaran la razon los vere y ahi en ese moento y dire no estava loco
Dr Jonathan Reed Demonstrations Alien Technology from another world. For those who do not know of this man type in Dr Jonathan Reed in youtube and watch the most outstanding account of alien human interaction in modern history. This is what ufo communities have tried to hide for nearly 15 years. Jonathan Reed was filmed on live television using the alien device he recovered in the woods when his encounter took place.
is this counting on the thought that these planets orbit their stars on a path that puts them between the scope and the star? Because what if the planet orbits 'vertically'?
That is a good question. You are correct. Only stars having planets that transit between the star and the telescope are measured. However, once we count the number stars having transiting planets and those that do not we can fairly accurately determine the total number of stars having orbiting earth-like planets.
yup. Waste of money lol. What if the life in other planets are the kind of creation that is made of different kind of material that doesnt require the right temperature to survive. I mean not all lives are made with the contents as human.. Wasting money!
I think Extraterrestrial life doesn't need methane, H2O,O2, Earth-like temperature or Co2. According to theory of Universe, its an energy can be obtained in any state. For example: Virus can live in both living and non living state and they are not composed from methane but they live. There may be alien civilization who don't respire but get energy somehow to live and may be primitive or more developed than us. We also crashed from asteroid containing life supporting stuffs on organic soup!!!!
Did anyone see the agitating mishap at 6:02? That kinda look like a twitch or something. Well if there is another planet that has almost an identical planet like ours that would be so cool
We live on a rock, orbiting a star. We know that there are countless other rocks, orbiting countless other stars in countless other galaxies in the universe. The logic alone should prove that there is life elsewhere.
As long as we don't screw up our planet we will discover so much in the next 100 years. We couldn't even fly 100 years ago, now we are looking for other planets like us in space which is quite an achievement.
I was thinking the same as you. To inhabit other planets sounds like a fantasy to me but if you look back a few years in time you'll see where we've come from and what people have managed to achieve. Lets just hope there's something to inhabit out there!
okie i like the scientific america link haha. it says "It turns out though, that we use virtually every part of the brain, and that [most of] the brain is active almost all the time," Gordon adds. "Let's put it this way: the brain represents three percent of the body's weight and uses 20 percent of the body's energy." .if this is a fact then all i can say is that the brain has its limit. will it evolve? i dont know, but i wish it evolve now =).... im not an evolutionist
Actually that's not the fact;if we close all our windows,doors and turn off our lights and think for at least an hour daily then we can use our brain more than we usually do.
As you guys are stating that we only use 10% of our brain,i must agree because only few great mortals were able to employ their true use of their brain(still only 40%),why do we measure intelligence quotient?it doesn't mean that if a person has the highest i.q has to be the smartest but i must say he can think faster.Famous mortals like Albert Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton used about 40% of their brain,so why are we not able to use the most out of our brain?
@ethositachi I think it means that at any given time 10% is used, but we use almost 100%. Kind of like a computer's CPU usually being around 10%. I'm not sure if that's what they mean though.
haha nice comments, or debates? well i think it's not bad to search for other planets that supports life. but i disagree that i came or we came from a monkey or a crab. well i just disagree since if the evolution is true then it should continue and not stop. i mean is that if we all came from a single celled microorganism and we expand due to mitosis, became a fish => monkey => humans then back to dust? i just dont understand i think its not evolution that we should call it. whats next?be a god?
theres plenty of room for humans to evolve dude. if we could live in peace, then we would be highly evolved compared to humanity at present. not to mention we use less than 10% of our brain. no one really knows our true potential should we learn to use our full brain.
i think we are already in our true potential since if we exceed 10%(is this a fact? i just dont know wish it is) of our brain process it can blew our brain off. not exactly of what i mean but think of it, we have limitations like everything do. theres always an end( I wish not). and btw, i think we use more than 10% because of our involuntary muscles, cardio respiratory and other stuffs we do that we dont need think off.
Wow, you are very unintelligent. We control 10% of the processes going on in our brain, the rest goes on automatically which is for your own good. Do you really want to control your heartbeat, or the way you digest your food? That 90% of our brain isn't just gray mass with no purpose. The way humans will evolve is already evident; we will slowly become more cyborg as time goes on. Just think about how reliant our society has become on cell phones, and envision the future.
if your gonna debate, lets do it in a productive manner maybe? i agree that synthetic life will replace organic life, most scientists have said that already, but how can we be sure that the remaining part of our brain is reserved entirely for autonomous processes? if youve read any books on someone who has empirically proven this, feel free to link them, id love to get a better understanding on this subject matter.
Thank you for forcing me to Google the subject (no sarcasm intended, I'm really thanking you). Apparently it's a misconception that we use 10% of our brain, it's actually more accurate to say that we understand only 10% of the way our brain works. Google "why humans use only 10% of their brain" and click on the first result given which for me was "scientific America". Lets bounce some ideas back and fourth if you'd like.
haha, im sorry but im not unintelligent, its just that i dont know the 10% part of the brain. and i would just like to tell you that every involuntary muscles that we do not control by ourselves is called involuntary since we do not control it. as I said it is cotrolled by our brain. as a fact without a brain people will be dead. synapses from our brain makes our whole body moves. i want to learn more, i just dont have the time to research for more. youtube helps btw. i love internet =)
well recent studies have concluded that the intestines have a kind of second brain that controls digestion and pooping etc, (like my very scientific terminology? :D)
Came out not to long ago so you shouldn't have to much trouble finding new on that with google
actually even the ancient greeks knew that the earth was round. google "Eratosthenes earth circumference." he calculated the circumference in 240 b.c. to about 1%. or 16% depending on which units you think believe he used.
in addition, aristotle reasoned one hundred years prior to this that the earth must be round due to the inability to see certain constellations depending if you are far north or south. only on a round surface is this possible.
<& none of us can make educational guesses about anything out there anyway. 99% of everybody in the entire planet will never even go out of our atmosphere in our lifetime. To say we know anything about space is obsurd. we just take information from people we've never even met who claim they have been out there. maybe they have, maybe they havent. and if they have, whos to say they are telling the truth. or In the case of film, showing us the truth.if the universe is big as they say, life exists.
If you know how big the universe is, the idea that there are not other habitable planets is quite rediculous. even including our own living circumstances, but if you do forget about that, there can be other life that we dont know about or maybe cannot even comprehend. To assume that all life would live exactly the same way in the same habitat is rediculous as well. there is no way to understand how a lifeform lives if we've never even seen it. every day science finds something new. --->
Our perfect planet revolving around a perfect sun, in a perfect orbit, with perfect protection. They just throw out a wide range for the habitable zone, based on theories. What if the Habitable zone is exactly where the earth is compared to our star. If earth was 1 millimeter off we would not be here. The perfection of the planet, and the perfection of the life that inhabits it will we very few and far between. 1 in infinity chance of this happening. We are it.
Actually, do to recent studies, the Earth isn't the most ideal planet to live on. The habitable zone is simply habitable, water doesn't boil, water doesn't freeze. The Earth doesn't have a perfect orbit, in fact, it's rather elliptical. So the habitable zone is about 5mill kilometers across and around 90mill ks out from the star, depending on the star.
You're not understanding what I am saying. The earths orbit is perfect for supporting life as it is. It's not a perfect orbit. But if we were to shift off our orbit one way or the other we all die. If we weren't tilted exactly like we are, we die. If the earth isn't exactly where it's at, what it is, with this exact star, we die. Sure the universe is infinite. But all we have to do is look at earth to understand there isn't another.
You contradict yourself. The chances of another earth are infinite over infinite simply because, in an infinite universe, there is an infinite number of chances for something to be alike. It may not support life, or it may not have a water ocean, or it could be almost the same as our Earth. Theoretically, there are an infinite number of habitable planets, because the universe is infinite!
I take it your not an evolution believer.We've found life to be very hardy.There is life here that exists with no light,in very cold,and very high temps etc..Life has adapted to this planet.I think a planet could have a less favorable orbit with temp extremes and harbor lifeforms.Allthough they'd be less likely to advance.We need a telescope powerfull enough to see(not detect,srry keplar) far away planets to give us an idea of how common rocky planets are.I do respect your opinion,just debating.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@noblepuker. No I don't beleive in evolution, because I don't see half humans half whatever we are suppose to be involving into. It takes millions of years to evolve right? Well where are the humans that are evolving into something higher? If we are related to monkeys(no wait fish now?) crabs? hell they don't even know what we evolved from......Why aren't their half monkey fish crab humans? or intelligent fish people, or monkeys that do more than sniff their ass and throw poo? continues.......
you said theres no chance of life elsewhere in our universe? i agree with you in that i dont believe intelligent life exists elsewhere in our universe, but what about parallel universes? or just other universes in general? it seems like the scale of things gets bigger infinitely as one continues to zoomout
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@noblepuker Continued. Earth can barely support life as it is. Humans are killing it off at a faster rate every year. Kepler is definitely the first step to finding something. In it's design it's still very primitive, and undeniably useless. The chance of life happening again in an infinite universe is 0, because of the infinite perfection of our planet. It would take infinity to recreate the perfect specs that make earth able to harbor life. Earth is 1 in infinity. We are it.
In the beginning, we were all fish. Okay? Swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby, and the retard baby was different, so it got to live. So Retard Fish goes on to make more retard babies, and then one day, a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with its mutant fish hands and it had butt sex with a squirrel or something Retard frog-squirrel,
and then *that* had a retard baby which was a monkey-fish-frog And then this monkey-fish-frog had butt sex with that monkey, and that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey and that made you!
We have no choice but to find another planet if we want to keep the human race going. Cause as we all the know the Earth will be gone when the sun is gone in about 4 billion years. But the Sun will be 10% brighter in a billion years causing our Earth's ocean to evaporate. So we have no choice but to travel and find other planet(s).
on a show they said when the sunn gets hot like u said it will burn earth but... it will melt mars,ueropa,and titan, there we can live for some more time if we run out of r time on earth
the earth will not be gone... it will be unhabitable.. and something will wiped out all the human race in earth... but i hope it doesnt turn out like dat
what if the planets never pass in front of their stars, with respect to the position that kepler is observing them from??
mortenrobinson 1 day ago
4 aliens don't like it that we come closer to them
Nionity 1 week ago
good work NASA,you do very impressive work,i hope all mankind would see this video,thank you:-)
TheSpace81 4 weeks ago
How about this. Finding a planet that is just right for humans doesn't mean that it's right for some types of aliens in the universe. Such as some type of aliens can only live on a super cold planet and can't live on a planet that is just right for humans...
So humans, stop trying to find a planet that is perfect for a human, but say a planet that is perfect for some living things...
FunkyMango7 4 weeks ago in playlist Earth-like planet discovered
wait, isnt there a bunch of bacteria and fish living deep in the see so wouldnt planets be sure tp have bacteria or something in the ice...
1337EK 1 month ago
I hope that i could go to kepler 22-B one day......
NJBZX 1 month ago
Example of human denying existences of another life is like a person living in the middle of desert inside a dark cave which he never left in his life ...believes he is alone on this planet by just looking through a tiny peep hole for couple of second
evoeclipse 1 month ago
4 pepole are christians
MrSaftDude 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's a whole new world we live!
(Do-do-do, Do, Do-do-do!)
It's a whole new way to see!
(Do-do-do, Do, Do-do-do!)
It's a whole new place!
With a brand new attitude!
But you still gotta CATCH'EM ALL!
Be the best that you can be!
HxCasianese 1 month ago in playlist Earth-like planet discovered
uhhhh hi i thought nasa was fuckin done
TheBlueEyedRaven 1 month ago in playlist Earth-like planet discovered
Thumbs up if you believe life exists elsewhere in the universe!
JOETRANROCK 1 month ago in playlist Earth-like planet discovered
I hope we'll find evidence of life within the next two decades. There will be next generation spacetelescopes (like JWST) which will be able to find even more information about these planets. I know other life is out there. It's just waiting to be discovered.
DiscusGliding 1 month ago
when i think nasa i think multi million dollars, this video took about 3 dollars to make and edit IF that
moeeyayo 1 month ago
this a very nice video... just love it! :)
thegreeensky 2 months ago
thats funny how she is like, 'if you have a really nice camera, you have 10 mega pixels' and then the guy says, 'kepler has 96 MILLION pixels'.... ummm thats 96 mega pixels
StaffandStormcloud 4 months ago
Comment removed
bigwaverider1000 4 months ago
@NASAtelevision
#1.Keplar will find what portion of the area your looking at in the sky that has planets of a certain size =So they can narrow it down to our size planets
#2.James webb will find certain temptures in planets that have water an the age of the planet = Goldilocks zone that allows our type of life
#3.Hubble= will show optical pictures of what shapes an colors planets are=like google earth like views the planets structure an life
= Find our type of life in the universe FASTER
bigwaverider1000 4 months ago
Comment removed
bigwaverider1000 4 months ago
Comment removed
bigwaverider1000 4 months ago
Wait, so we locked a guy named kepler into a big round thingy??!? ;O!?
Jokes aside, this is the best thing that we have done for along time to find Extra-terrestrials.
alexlinde56 7 months ago
96 millions mega pxiel DUDE I WANT THAT!
taperi5 9 months ago
On 2 February 2011, the Kepler team announced the results from the data of May to September 2009. They found 1235 planetary candidates circling 997 host stars, more than twice the number of currently known exoplanets. This haul included 68 planetary candidates of Earth-like size and 54 planetary candidates in the habitable zone of their star. They estimate that 6% of stars host Earth-size planets and 19% of all stars have multiple planets.
MyCosmeticsworld 9 months ago
there are things on our planet that dont require water or oxigen so why would it be needed for life on other planets the answer is simple it wouldnt be.
rgrggfdgfgr 9 months ago
@rgrggfdgfgr All life on Earth requires water, without exeptions.
Helge129 6 months ago
@Helge129 RIIIIIGGGHHHHTTT buddy, just because you are not aware of the found life for there are more then a couple things on Earth that do not require light water or oxygen. You should do some research or at least not answer blindly to things you just asume.......
rgrggfdgfgr 6 months ago
@rgrggfdgfgr You can have life without light, and without oxygen, but not without water, because water is the only molecule capable of the complex biochemical reactions you need.
Helge129 6 months ago
@Helge129 That didnt even meen anything, Make a real point I'm sure what you just said was incorrect and ignorant I'm even willing to bet you just made up a false point ,That or you're REALLY dumb....
And then maybe you can explain all the life we know about that dosnt need water.......
Don't wright me again you should maybe do some research. I've got better things to do eatherway.
rgrggfdgfgr 6 months ago
@rgrggfdgfgr I remember having seen some documentary some years ago that there were found some bacteria that was found in a cavernous system deprived from water and oxygen.
alter12345 6 months ago
@alter12345
I saw the same documentary. IIRC, they were living off of Hydrogen Sulfide.
mtszabo 5 months ago
@rgrggfdgfgr wow, not to be a prick here but you really ought to learn how to spell before you go about questioning other peoples intelligence. its pretty hard to take your comments seriously when you can`t even spell simple words like(meen) mean,(dosnt)doesn't and(eatherway) either way(two words not one). my 7 year old has a better grasp on how to spell, or so it would seem.
ta2joe13 4 months ago
Go Science,Go!!!
FlorinTanu 10 months ago
i think one day we will be the aliens invading planets.
tcrusader 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISCLOSURE NOW, IS THE LAW TO KNOW THE TRUTH
ufohunter16903 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISCLOSURE NOW, IS THE LAW TO KNOW THE TRUTH
ufohunter16903 10 months ago
It's sickening to think how much the world spends on creating weapons to kill other people, when we could be using that money to explore the stars.
abetterplayer 10 months ago 29
@abetterplayer Why even use worthless paper money ? that only limits what we can accomplish and creates imbalances in power. What we need is a resource based economy
INOVATION27 1 month ago in playlist Earth-like planet discovered
@INOVATION27 honestly i think that would give countries more reason to build stronger armies.
carlsagandisciple 1 month ago in playlist Earth-like planet discovered
@carlsagandisciple Not at all, but for it to work, we need a united earth.
INOVATION27 1 month ago
"we could be using that money to explore the stars."@abetterplayer
its not WE, its THEM...the elites. They call the fu%$in shots man.
RideMyBMW 1 month ago in playlist NASA's Kepler Telescope
@RideMyBMW whoever knows and understands more is going to be in charge
carlsagandisciple 1 month ago in playlist Earth-like planet discovered
@carlsagandisciple right..it ain´t us man
RideMyBMW 1 month ago
I'm always chocked that people say that the life can only happen in a planete as earth.... everytime I want to tell them that that is wrong. the life AS WE KNOW is only possible on planetes like earth....
docsharp00 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesus is future king of earth, repent for his judgement comes. Jesus loves you
bass109 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesus is future king of earth, repent for his judgement comes. Jesus loves you
bass109 11 months ago
our government spends trillions of dollars on stupid wars imagine that money going towards science.
Zurround100 11 months ago
@Zurround100 really much less that in military things ;)
docsharp00 11 months ago
@EPiiCxPwn yeah you wouldnt believe me me if i tried, theres things going on behind closed doors that would blow your mind.... do some reasearch, you have to understand our tech is so advanced, we had free energy 50 years back, anti gravity etc ... its a sick lie we live in.
1TrExXaNaToR 11 months ago
the secret space mission is so far beyond this low level smoke screen joke!
1TrExXaNaToR 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
jesus christ loves you all, bless you all
bass109 1 year ago
Editar detalhes do vídeo Editar anotações Editar legendas AudioSwap Estatísticas do Insight
American Journal of physics - graceli
ANCELMOLUIZGRACELI 14 vídeos Inscrever-se
ANCELMOLUIZGRACELI 1 year ago
I wonder what kind of drugs other planets have.
GlennFalconiVEVO 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there are many datig side for you naneedj.info
shakira20848 1 year ago
what happened to that lady around 6:01 ???
BlueLotusSC 1 year ago
Frustrating that we'll never know if theres life on other planets in our life time :(
mariahandchristina 1 year ago
@mariahandchristina don't give up hope. I think we'll find evidence for some form of life on another planet within a decade. We will have the new bigger observatories and better technology for analyzing the spectrum of extra solar planet atmospheres by then.
tron81 1 year ago
Gliese 581 G
PcGamerPaul 1 year ago
Surely most stars we can see don't even exist anymore due to the amount of time it takes for light to travel to our earth. How do they know if they are looking at a living star, or an extinct stars light which is now only reaching us billions of years later.
speedtab 1 year ago
@speedtab Aside of maybe Betelgeuse, most stars we can see with the naked eye still exist. Most of the stars (the furthest being I think 80k lighyears roughly) still exist. 100,000 years is nothing in the life of most but the largest of stars.
Helge129 11 months ago
I love long videos about Space
pufixas 1 year ago
eww whos idea was it to puts pictures of columbus when the lady is likening them to early explorers. I guess they deserve to be dismembered and fed to a spider too.
DavidWicked 1 year ago
We do use 100 percent of our brain .. just not at all times.
You wouldn't want to fart,sneeze, burp, twitch, all at the same time.
Using 100 percent of your body would just be involuntary movements and suffering.
AgrivatedKillah 1 year ago 2
How do we know if it's a small planet or a big planet?
Asuraith 1 year ago
6:03 WTF?
blizrfiz 1 year ago
if aliens do exist and they are thousands of years more advanced than us, I wonder if they went about finding planets and taking trips to their moon when they're technology was in its infancy like us. Maybe they had a country that was a super power on their planet that could afford tho do such things??? maybe there is a flag on a moon orbiting a planet and maybe its not even in this galaxy. the universe truly is amazing, i find it hard to put my expressions into words about the possibilities
IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY 1 year ago
@IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY Yes, but maybe aliens are just not interested in the universe. Or, they may live in a planet covered with very dense clouds (like Titan or Venus) blocking the view of sky during millions of years, or the can be underwater creatures... What I mean is that we always suposse that aliens are curious like the humans are, but it is possible too that they dont care about the rest of the universe.
T0R0YD 1 year ago
@T0R0YD I won't dispute that
IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY 1 year ago
@T0R0YD Usually if an animal is intelligent, it will also have curiosity.
Most people don't realize it's not about complex life, if we just find a single set of bacteria on an "alien planet" then that will be the greatest discovery known to man-kind.
AgrivatedKillah 1 year ago 15
Too bad NASA has such a reputation for lying. It's unfortunate because I would like to believe what they are saying here, however 30 years of wasted trips to a space station which has produced not a single interesting scientific discovery leads me to believe they are liars. We know they found ancient artifacts on the Moon 40 years ago yet they still deny it.
nobadges 1 year ago
@nobadges how do we know this exactly?
blizrfiz 1 year ago
we humans can achieve anything we imagine, only if we unite to a achieve our common goals.
TheKljovoReloaded 1 year ago
@TheKljovoReloaded religion will divide us and opinion which really is a shame
IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY 1 year ago
@IRELANDISMYCOUNTRY agreed
TheKljovoReloaded 1 year ago
If we're planning to move on to new planets just to end up killing them like we're killing beautiful Earth, I hope we NEVER make it to a new planet. I'm pretty sure we wont in time. :) The universe will be happy and so will I.
djsmith459 1 year ago
i hope scientist will invent life extending medicine that would help people survive and age more than 100 years
KhPharos 1 year ago
@KhPharos Eat less. You lower your metabolism, your cells divide slower, it takes longer for the telomeres in your DNA to wear down, and therefore longer before your cells start destroying themselves.
smariot 1 year ago
The transit method of detecting planets is analogous to looking at your watch face in a dark room. You cannot see the second hand but detect it when it passes in front of the luminous dots.
deadfrd 1 year ago
any one who exist in this planet should account for earth destruction. i think it would be fair enough for mother earth to decide what shall she do for the incoming years. i was just curious bout the facts written on science books, they told us there were other planets, here is mars, venus, blah blah blah, but how will i believe if i havent seen them in reality? do u think this mission shows truth or lies? how would we know it?
johnphilipgamboa 1 year ago
but wouldn't the large stars fire up later then the stars like our giving planet a change to form before the stellar winds blow all the debris away
1961arnie 1 year ago
@1961arnie It's possible, just not very likely. As I said, though, even if a rocky planet were to develop in the habitable zone of say, Rigel, it's very unlikely life would ever evolve there - if the history of life on Earth is any indication. It took several hundred million years before the earliest single-celled organisms began to appear here; multicellular life needed more than 3 billion years. Stars like Rigel just won't last long enough for any of that to happen.
ancalites 1 year ago
@1961arnie I may have misunderstood your last post, if your comment on my channel is anything to go by. I was indicating that giant stars are unlikely to harbour worlds with life. There are billions upon billions of Sun-like stars in the galaxy which could very well have the right conditions for life to evolve and the necessary longevity for it to flourish. So, don't despair - I'm sure the pattern of life on this planet has occurred time and time again on a multitude of worlds.
ancalites 1 year ago
is Rigle and the super massive going to create black holes when they die off ? or Newtron stars
1961arnie 1 year ago
@1961arnie Most of them will likely just form neutron stars, but extremely large ones like VY Canis Majoris could collapse into black holes yes.
ancalites 1 year ago
any body have any ideas how long any of these stars have been there ? like Rigal or Beatlejuice Deneb or canis Major
1961arnie 1 year ago
Not very long. As I said, massive stars live fast and die young. Rigel, Betelgeuse, Deneb etc have lifetimes in the order of a few million years. Betelgeuse is estimated to have been around for about 8 million years tops, and yet is already in its death throes.
Sirius is believed to be about 250 million years old. It won't burn out as quickly as the supermassive stars mentioned above, but it's still limited to a lifetime of around 1 billion years (a mere tenth of the Sun's longevity).
ancalites 1 year ago
what other reason would dis bar a large star from having planets
1961arnie 1 year ago
@1961arnie They can have planets, though it's less likely. Massive stars have far more powerful stellar winds, causing their dust disks (the material around a new-born star out of which planets accrete) to be rapidly blown away. A handful of planets have been found around giant stars, though, so it is possible.
Unfortunately, even if a rocky planet developed in the habitable zone, it would have a grim future. Massive stars burn out and die very quickly, precluding complex life from evolving.
ancalites 1 year ago
so we are talking about the orbit of mars or maybe Jupiter to have a habitual planet around Sirius? what about the larger stars
1961arnie 1 year ago
@1961arnie A little less than the orbit of Jupiter, yes. But Sirius has other problems that make it a poor candidate for hosting life, such as the fact that it puts out much more hard radiation than Sol, and the presence of its companion star, Sirius B, which would probably disrupt the orbits of any planets there significantly.
Larger stars would have a very distant (and wide) HZ: Arcturus' would be about 11 AU, for example. But like Sirius, they are not good candidates for a slew of reasons.
ancalites 1 year ago
maybe you don't understand what I'm talking about ok i try again you can't earth around a Canis Major at 93 million miles the distance between us and the sun; how far wold a earth like planet have to be away from Canis major in order to have water and an atmosphere
1961arnie 1 year ago
@1961arnie The habitable zone is relative to the star. It's usually defined as being the region around a star where water would comfortably exist in a liquid state on the surface of a rocky planet. So you are indeed correct that an Earth-like planet would not be possible around Sirius (luminosity = 25x Sun) at 1 AU. Instead, it would have to orbit at around 4.5 AU to receive the same level of insolation that the Earth does around the Sun.
ancalites 1 year ago
is it possible for the habitable zone can change depend on the star
1961arnie 1 year ago
@1961arnie
Yes offc, the son is expanding, and thus the green aera :)
this is why we should start living on another planet
Basfarmatthijs 1 year ago
Go Kepler!!!
Sirchud68 1 year ago
I wonder if they the aliens took the myans(one that made the calender). If we see aliens that look like us i say myans ppl.
NL9393 1 year ago
lol okay
feanor921 1 year ago
we will find Reach! lol jk but that would be awsome to someday live on other planets
sk8terhumes12345 1 year ago
yup as long as theres no covenant :D
feanor921 1 year ago
@sk8terhumes12345 than next will be harvest
sammysf415 1 year ago
nothing short of Intergalactic peeping toms. The aliens will come & arrest us all on spying charges.
1980cossie 1 year ago 2
lmao that would be intresting
feanor921 1 year ago
Guauuuuuuuuuuuu y a mi que me creian LOCO cuando niño decia de alguna foma estas ideas que no estamos solo y que afuera podria estar nuestra respuesta y 100-pre edicho que mi lugar no es aqui esta en alguna estrellita en ese universo algundia medaran la razon los vere y ahi en ese moento y dire no estava loco
saludos desde Mi vella gautemala
barreagarcia19810303 1 year ago
I want Natalie Batalha to give me a Science Project!! yummmm!!
UfoFootage2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr Jonathan Reed Demonstrations Alien Technology from another world. For those who do not know of this man type in Dr Jonathan Reed in youtube and watch the most outstanding account of alien human interaction in modern history. This is what ufo communities have tried to hide for nearly 15 years. Jonathan Reed was filmed on live television using the alien device he recovered in the woods when his encounter took place.
watch?v=-Jmm2SaAbJo
ProjectCameIot 1 year ago
is this counting on the thought that these planets orbit their stars on a path that puts them between the scope and the star? Because what if the planet orbits 'vertically'?
Wikkiter 1 year ago
That is a good question. You are correct. Only stars having planets that transit between the star and the telescope are measured. However, once we count the number stars having transiting planets and those that do not we can fairly accurately determine the total number of stars having orbiting earth-like planets.
thermalf 1 year ago
Don't make poor judge.
monxandria 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Waste of money
JackBlair2 1 year ago
yup. Waste of money lol. What if the life in other planets are the kind of creation that is made of different kind of material that doesnt require the right temperature to survive. I mean not all lives are made with the contents as human.. Wasting money!
sirajrizvi 1 year ago
Yes. I'm not sure why it is the officials all think that all life is even remotely similar to us.
ScottZirpolo 1 year ago
I think Extraterrestrial life doesn't need methane, H2O,O2, Earth-like temperature or Co2. According to theory of Universe, its an energy can be obtained in any state. For example: Virus can live in both living and non living state and they are not composed from methane but they live. There may be alien civilization who don't respire but get energy somehow to live and may be primitive or more developed than us. We also crashed from asteroid containing life supporting stuffs on organic soup!!!!
prabhawapearl 1 year ago
Alpha centari, there you will find your answer to the question, are we alone.
miketent09 1 year ago
3 years? so it will be back 2012? ok :P
tandis97 1 year ago
Did anyone see the agitating mishap at 6:02? That kinda look like a twitch or something. Well if there is another planet that has almost an identical planet like ours that would be so cool
aquillacute 1 year ago
who says that life needs water??
fuckitandfuckyou 1 year ago 2
Yes, our contemplation, and now exploration, of the cosmos is a precious gift. The meaning of life may be joy as we explore earth and the cosmos.
thermalf 2 years ago
We live on a rock, orbiting a star. We know that there are countless other rocks, orbiting countless other stars in countless other galaxies in the universe. The logic alone should prove that there is life elsewhere.
3188rlh 2 years ago 9
There may be much life in the universe or we may be the only but either way think how amazing!
steezysn0brdr 2 years ago 2
As long as we don't screw up our planet we will discover so much in the next 100 years. We couldn't even fly 100 years ago, now we are looking for other planets like us in space which is quite an achievement.
fightfan101a 2 years ago 51
@fightfan101a
I was thinking the same as you. To inhabit other planets sounds like a fantasy to me but if you look back a few years in time you'll see where we've come from and what people have managed to achieve. Lets just hope there's something to inhabit out there!
TheMightySlusk 2 years ago
Very interesting. Did you see the tiny man inside the telescope at 3:22?
MPH84 2 years ago
So when does nigga fly?
12345JJBB 2 years ago
Wow! What an exciting project!
JohnnySoprano87 2 years ago 5
okie i like the scientific america link haha. it says "It turns out though, that we use virtually every part of the brain, and that [most of] the brain is active almost all the time," Gordon adds. "Let's put it this way: the brain represents three percent of the body's weight and uses 20 percent of the body's energy." .if this is a fact then all i can say is that the brain has its limit. will it evolve? i dont know, but i wish it evolve now =).... im not an evolutionist
domskris 2 years ago
Actually that's not the fact;if we close all our windows,doors and turn off our lights and think for at least an hour daily then we can use our brain more than we usually do.
awesomesoccerfan 2 years ago
uhm, well, just close your eyes and go to a quiet comfortable room.
domskris 2 years ago
As you guys are stating that we only use 10% of our brain,i must agree because only few great mortals were able to employ their true use of their brain(still only 40%),why do we measure intelligence quotient?it doesn't mean that if a person has the highest i.q has to be the smartest but i must say he can think faster.Famous mortals like Albert Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton used about 40% of their brain,so why are we not able to use the most out of our brain?
awesomesoccerfan 2 years ago
wtf... that claim of '10% brain usage' is a slap in the face of neuroscience.
Don't blithely repeat bullshit you've heard somewhere. Do you know what IQ even measures?
ethositachi 2 years ago 20
@ethositachi I think it means that at any given time 10% is used, but we use almost 100%. Kind of like a computer's CPU usually being around 10%. I'm not sure if that's what they mean though.
zookap 1 year ago
With current technology we could terraform mars starting now to have it ready to live on in around 300 years.
SymmetricPanda 2 years ago
haha nice comments, or debates? well i think it's not bad to search for other planets that supports life. but i disagree that i came or we came from a monkey or a crab. well i just disagree since if the evolution is true then it should continue and not stop. i mean is that if we all came from a single celled microorganism and we expand due to mitosis, became a fish => monkey => humans then back to dust? i just dont understand i think its not evolution that we should call it. whats next?be a god?
domskris 2 years ago
theres plenty of room for humans to evolve dude. if we could live in peace, then we would be highly evolved compared to humanity at present. not to mention we use less than 10% of our brain. no one really knows our true potential should we learn to use our full brain.
kristopopins 2 years ago
i think we are already in our true potential since if we exceed 10%(is this a fact? i just dont know wish it is) of our brain process it can blew our brain off. not exactly of what i mean but think of it, we have limitations like everything do. theres always an end( I wish not). and btw, i think we use more than 10% because of our involuntary muscles, cardio respiratory and other stuffs we do that we dont need think off.
domskris 2 years ago
Wow, you are very unintelligent. We control 10% of the processes going on in our brain, the rest goes on automatically which is for your own good. Do you really want to control your heartbeat, or the way you digest your food? That 90% of our brain isn't just gray mass with no purpose. The way humans will evolve is already evident; we will slowly become more cyborg as time goes on. Just think about how reliant our society has become on cell phones, and envision the future.
deadpoetic333 2 years ago
if your gonna debate, lets do it in a productive manner maybe? i agree that synthetic life will replace organic life, most scientists have said that already, but how can we be sure that the remaining part of our brain is reserved entirely for autonomous processes? if youve read any books on someone who has empirically proven this, feel free to link them, id love to get a better understanding on this subject matter.
kristopopins 2 years ago
Thank you for forcing me to Google the subject (no sarcasm intended, I'm really thanking you). Apparently it's a misconception that we use 10% of our brain, it's actually more accurate to say that we understand only 10% of the way our brain works. Google "why humans use only 10% of their brain" and click on the first result given which for me was "scientific America". Lets bounce some ideas back and fourth if you'd like.
deadpoetic333 2 years ago
haha, im sorry but im not unintelligent, its just that i dont know the 10% part of the brain. and i would just like to tell you that every involuntary muscles that we do not control by ourselves is called involuntary since we do not control it. as I said it is cotrolled by our brain. as a fact without a brain people will be dead. synapses from our brain makes our whole body moves. i want to learn more, i just dont have the time to research for more. youtube helps btw. i love internet =)
domskris 2 years ago
Actually our spine controls our heart beat and digestion etc.
And I think we'll evolve both biologically and by enhancing our bodies with cybernetics :P
deadwalker1234 2 years ago
uhm, the spine is like an extension cord connecting the brain to other parts of the body, any way i wanna learn more about kepler =)
domskris 2 years ago
Eventually we'll be able to upload our consciousness unto machines for true immortality.
MrMalavon 2 years ago
well recent studies have concluded that the intestines have a kind of second brain that controls digestion and pooping etc, (like my very scientific terminology? :D)
Came out not to long ago so you shouldn't have to much trouble finding new on that with google
westcountryside 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're a moron. Try finding some citations for those figures you pulled out of your ass.
At least you appear functional enough to stack bricks or pack shopping (you're using a computer!).
ethositachi 2 years ago
who is moron? maybe s/he is just lazy to search some figures on the net like me so i depend on the ideas commented by other users. =)
domskris 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah hahaha what a waste of money earth is only home for us so let's destroy it hahahaha
ripper269 2 years ago
Search YouTube for "Carl Sagan - 'A Glorious Dawn' ft Stephen Hawking"
thermalf 2 years ago 4
we dont know jack squat
ShootBlues 2 years ago
in the time Columbus found America the most of the people didn't believe the earth was round,he knew.
It's very selfish to think this great universe is build for us alone,or are we innocent bystanders,don't think so
how many people are knowing in the whole street all their neighbours,it's our own ego who is letting believe what's excisting and what's not i guess.
sorry for my english
planecrazynl 2 years ago
actually even the ancient greeks knew that the earth was round. google "Eratosthenes earth circumference." he calculated the circumference in 240 b.c. to about 1%. or 16% depending on which units you think believe he used.
in addition, aristotle reasoned one hundred years prior to this that the earth must be round due to the inability to see certain constellations depending if you are far north or south. only on a round surface is this possible.
thelovablebarriboy 2 years ago
<& none of us can make educational guesses about anything out there anyway. 99% of everybody in the entire planet will never even go out of our atmosphere in our lifetime. To say we know anything about space is obsurd. we just take information from people we've never even met who claim they have been out there. maybe they have, maybe they havent. and if they have, whos to say they are telling the truth. or In the case of film, showing us the truth.if the universe is big as they say, life exists.
TruthhturT 2 years ago
If you know how big the universe is, the idea that there are not other habitable planets is quite rediculous. even including our own living circumstances, but if you do forget about that, there can be other life that we dont know about or maybe cannot even comprehend. To assume that all life would live exactly the same way in the same habitat is rediculous as well. there is no way to understand how a lifeform lives if we've never even seen it. every day science finds something new. --->
TruthhturT 2 years ago
our universe isn´t infinite but is suposed to be onother billions of universe out there with your own fisic laws ..we are nothing.. xD
castlevania0169 2 years ago
What galaxy is it that appears at 2:12? I want to go out and download a hi-res version of that for my collection =P
patricknelson 2 years ago
Hi! It looks like andromeda, but Im not 100% sure
wurlymurl 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Earth is 1 in infinity. Meaning we are the only life in the galaxy. Meaning what a waste of millions of tax payers money.
CTastic1 2 years ago
shit! you're right! someone call the newspapers!
tromar 2 years ago
@CTastic1: Based on the assumption that life exists nowhere else in the universe... what an incredible assumption.
patricknelson 2 years ago
Our perfect planet revolving around a perfect sun, in a perfect orbit, with perfect protection. They just throw out a wide range for the habitable zone, based on theories. What if the Habitable zone is exactly where the earth is compared to our star. If earth was 1 millimeter off we would not be here. The perfection of the planet, and the perfection of the life that inhabits it will we very few and far between. 1 in infinity chance of this happening. We are it.
CTastic1 2 years ago
Actually, do to recent studies, the Earth isn't the most ideal planet to live on. The habitable zone is simply habitable, water doesn't boil, water doesn't freeze. The Earth doesn't have a perfect orbit, in fact, it's rather elliptical. So the habitable zone is about 5mill kilometers across and around 90mill ks out from the star, depending on the star.
:( I just realized what a nerd I am.
Soder96 2 years ago
You're not understanding what I am saying. The earths orbit is perfect for supporting life as it is. It's not a perfect orbit. But if we were to shift off our orbit one way or the other we all die. If we weren't tilted exactly like we are, we die. If the earth isn't exactly where it's at, what it is, with this exact star, we die. Sure the universe is infinite. But all we have to do is look at earth to understand there isn't another.
CTastic1 2 years ago
You contradict yourself. The chances of another earth are infinite over infinite simply because, in an infinite universe, there is an infinite number of chances for something to be alike. It may not support life, or it may not have a water ocean, or it could be almost the same as our Earth. Theoretically, there are an infinite number of habitable planets, because the universe is infinite!
Soder96 2 years ago
I take it your not an evolution believer.We've found life to be very hardy.There is life here that exists with no light,in very cold,and very high temps etc..Life has adapted to this planet.I think a planet could have a less favorable orbit with temp extremes and harbor lifeforms.Allthough they'd be less likely to advance.We need a telescope powerfull enough to see(not detect,srry keplar) far away planets to give us an idea of how common rocky planets are.I do respect your opinion,just debating.
noblepuker 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@noblepuker. No I don't beleive in evolution, because I don't see half humans half whatever we are suppose to be involving into. It takes millions of years to evolve right? Well where are the humans that are evolving into something higher? If we are related to monkeys(no wait fish now?) crabs? hell they don't even know what we evolved from......Why aren't their half monkey fish crab humans? or intelligent fish people, or monkeys that do more than sniff their ass and throw poo? continues.......
CTastic1 2 years ago
If you haven't studied evolution don't speak about it. The evidence for evolution FAR FAR outweighs the evidence for creationism.
archadia17 2 years ago
yeah bro evolution is real. I am just waiting to evolve into god and make a planet full of morons who think they will evolve into me.
CTastic1 2 years ago
you said theres no chance of life elsewhere in our universe? i agree with you in that i dont believe intelligent life exists elsewhere in our universe, but what about parallel universes? or just other universes in general? it seems like the scale of things gets bigger infinitely as one continues to zoomout
kristopopins 2 years ago
haha, i wonder if we are all gods. probably the end of all life =)
domskris 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@noblepuker Continued. Earth can barely support life as it is. Humans are killing it off at a faster rate every year. Kepler is definitely the first step to finding something. In it's design it's still very primitive, and undeniably useless. The chance of life happening again in an infinite universe is 0, because of the infinite perfection of our planet. It would take infinity to recreate the perfect specs that make earth able to harbor life. Earth is 1 in infinity. We are it.
CTastic1 2 years ago
In the beginning, we were all fish. Okay? Swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby, and the retard baby was different, so it got to live. So Retard Fish goes on to make more retard babies, and then one day, a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with its mutant fish hands and it had butt sex with a squirrel or something Retard frog-squirrel,
SymmetricPanda 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and then *that* had a retard baby which was a monkey-fish-frog And then this monkey-fish-frog had butt sex with that monkey, and that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey and that made you!
SymmetricPanda 2 years ago
So there you go! You're the retarded offspring of five monkeys having butt sex with a fish-squirrel! Congratulations!
SymmetricPanda 2 years ago
And why I have tears in my eyes?
ilikekickassidea 2 years ago
that chick is damn hot!
tatboi89 2 years ago
i wish i wasnt born in 1991 lol at least i can see more planets and new life outside our world
Devega33 2 years ago
We have no choice but to find another planet if we want to keep the human race going. Cause as we all the know the Earth will be gone when the sun is gone in about 4 billion years. But the Sun will be 10% brighter in a billion years causing our Earth's ocean to evaporate. So we have no choice but to travel and find other planet(s).
Basketguy15 2 years ago
on a show they said when the sunn gets hot like u said it will burn earth but... it will melt mars,ueropa,and titan, there we can live for some more time if we run out of r time on earth
shinro1234 2 years ago
the earth will not be gone... it will be unhabitable.. and something will wiped out all the human race in earth... but i hope it doesnt turn out like dat
Devega33 2 years ago