@elite1performance You say that, but 0-60 is exactly the same as the M5, they're both limited to 155, and delimited the RS6 has a smaller top speed than the M5. It may have nearly 70 more HP, but it weighs over a 100 kilos more.
Besides, there's a new M5 coming with a twin turbo V8 - 555 BHP. And 50 kilos lighter than the one now. Love to see the RS6 match that.
@NobleM15fan you think that the rs6 its gonna be like that forever¿? rs6 its heavier thats why 0-60 its the same.. come on.. m5 could not even with the q7 v12¿? and its like 800 kilos heavier.. haha.. wait for the next generation of audi- rs6 its a v10 twin turbo : 570hp "for now.." and don`t worry we will see that match...BMW ITS JUST USING THE SAME ENGINE FOR ALL THE LINE.. THATS THE SAME THAT X5M AND X6M.
@elroriveraify I know it won't be like that forever - but Audis are very heavy cars. Even their R8 sueprcar is (basically a fast TT).
So what if the engine in the new M5 is the same as the X5-X6-M? The engine in the basic R8 is the same as the RS4. It's a good engine - so why make more than you need to? I wouldn't bother.
The RS6 now has a twin turbo V10 with 570 BHP. And it's still slower than the M5 released 5 years ago. M3 & M5 = still the best sports saloons in the world.
@HoleToHeaven I've got a video featuring it if you're interested. Opinions are split currently - some people think a smaller boosted engine is the way to go; others think they should've put twin turbos on the 5 litre V10. Whatever, I'm sure it'll be brilliant: there's never been a bad M5.
But you have to remember everytime MB (AMG, Brabus) want to beat Bmw (M Division) they've always had to go for a bigger displacement or even Forced Induction. I Love both MB and BMW, but I would rather take the Bmw to track or cruising, and the MB for family, or take the missus out. Hey everyone has their own opinions. MB has always been luxurious, comfort etc.. Bmw has been more performance, and race bred. Just my 2cents..
not like bmw is much better. u have to pay for a piece of shit iDrive system that never works the way u want it to. i would have the new Audi RS6 Avant. lot more power, better navigation system, good bang & olufsen sound system.
@kaizaM30b35 With N/A engine it become harder to power extra power every body now that if bmw make 5.0 v10 MB don't have to 5.0 v10 if you think like that you'd be fool every company had there style MB was always better in sport and comfort bmw doesn't have the bulls to even make a sport car like sls , slr and the sl65 ,clk63 black series they all have a track number better than all bmw cars and the most powerful bmw is bmw 760li with 544 hp it had 6.0 v12 biturbo and you say it had profomance
I don't like the S Type - the new XF is much better. The purists will tell you an estate sullies the bloodline, but I disagree - if it still drives as well as the saloon, which both cars in this video clearly do.
The only sports saloon worth breathing in the same breath as the M5 is the Jaguar XF-R. The Caddy CTS-V is nice, but to my mind a sports saloon has to come from a company with a history in motorsport. There has never been a Cadillac F1 car; there has never been a Cadillac Rally car; there has never been a Cadillac Touring car. Cadillac, stick with luxury: it's what you're best at. Leave the sports saloons to Jaguar and BMW.
agreed, the bmw steers and drives better while the "top model" of the arch rivals is not far behind and when it comes for full throtle, its quicker
however in my eyes better steering and braking parameters make the m5 more facinating cos l am rarely driving over 250km/h and l fancy disel power plants anyway
instead of arguing about which is better , the audi or merc or bmw, why don't we all agree that they're great wagons, and say amen for well built cars, and well engineered cars
@NobleM15fan As well as the Lexus IS300 sportcross, although ugly and a bit heavier, the weight distribution is actually better than the sedan. It's quite nice in the corners
@HoleToHeaven I'm not a fan of Lexus. Although I do respect them - the ISF is their first ever sports saloon, and they did do a good job. I wouldn't choose to by the IS300, but if someone gave me one I'd be happy.
That's fair enough, to each his own. I owned a 328 and now own an IS300 and i'll take the IS everyday of the week, to be honest o got boredof the 328, but the IS i love everyday. The ISF is a great car, and although overpriced the LFA is a great supercar. I've also driven both the Wagon and sedan version of the IS300 and the handling is better in the wagon, but it doesn't make up for the hideousness of it compared to the in my opinion, strikingly stylish sedan
@HoleToHeaven Fair enough, Lexus do make good cars. Except for that SC430 - that was horrible in almost every way. The LFA is gorgeous and a great car - but it costs twice as much as the equally gorgeous and even faster Ferrari 458. And no one's going to buy a Lexus over a Ferrari. They should've done what Nissan did with the GTR - undercut their rivals in price.
@NobleM15fan agreed, the sc430 is junk, other than the engine, but the rest was junk. Apparently people did buy the LFA over ferrari's cause all 499 are sold already. But it is too much, your paying because its exclusive. And they're actually losing money on that car, the R&D that went into the LFA took 9 years and was completely redesigned twice. so i guess if you want a car basically no one else has (10) in all of canada and about 40 in the states so thats what u pay for i guess
@HoleToHeaven I do like the LF-A - it's such a shame that after all that work, it will probably turn into another XJ200 - a complete failiure. I hope Lexus try it again - they entered the sports saloon market well enough with the IS-F.
The XJ200 was a flop because it didnt deliver on the promises made. it still ended up being an awesome car but no AWD and no V12 (both promised to preorder customers) never went to the production model. The LFA was delivered as promised, albeit 10 years after the mission was started, and thats why every car built for the first year sold. That and limited production
@NobleM15fan - or, in the RS6's case, to make the saloon as crap as the estate... such an overrated car. OK, so it's big and comfortable (up to a point) and fast in a straight line, but the E63 leaves it for dead on a windy road or a track, and the M5 leaves the E63 for dead too.
I would have the M5. For its drive, it would be my choice. I wouldn't blame anyone for choosing the Mercedes, it is a very good car. To be honest, they're both really good, but the M5 would be my choice.
Neither of them,I prefer the Audi Rs 6,its better,more powerfullmore faster,better looking,makes a better sound,more comfortable,i'm not saying the merc or beemer are rubbish,i'm saying that the Audi does it better.
I disagree. The Audi RS6 costs £10 000 more than these two, and despite having much more power, has the same 0-60 time and the same top speed as the M5 (204 mph). It's also not as practical.
Well,that's your opinion,and that was mine,i still prefer it,afterall,you can have all the money in the world,you won't buy the best car,you'll buy the car you lik,and i like the Rs6 more tan the other two.Heck,i prefer a Lancia Stratos to the BMW,even though they are not in the same cathegory,the BMW leaves me cold and the Merc dosn't put a smle on my face,the RS6 does.
For some reason in my mind these are absolutely pointless vehicles. I mean it seems that turning a BMW into a wagon pretty much defeats the purpose of a BMW. If you want a family oriented, ugly wagon just get a Volvo and be done with it. Admit to yourself that you are a family man and own a bland car made for children instead of driving. I guess I really hate wagons. LOL
Well i might agree that a high-performance wagon is pointless, but a BMW wagon most certainly is not. I dont even have to ask b/c i know you have never driven a BMW sport wagon before. You'd be surprised at what wagons are capable of nowadays (much better drivers than SUVs and minivans too). If you think wagons are ugly then that's your opinion which i cant change, but trust me, my friend, BMW and Mercedes wagons are certainly not "pointless".
Yes, i would definitely agree that a wagon is a much better choice than a mini van or SUV. Mini vans are absolutely the worst and ugliest vehicles on the road and SUVs are totally pointless as well because most of them can't even go off road. So what is the point of an SUV that has to stay on pavement? Dumb!! I have always liked coupes and drive an M3 so I guess i'm pretty prejudice against the looks and performance of anything bigger than a sedan.
Well then, it's no surprise an M3 driver isnt very fond of wagons lol. But i was trying to point out that wagons can put up almost as good performance stats as their sedan counterparts. But i cant think of any wagons that look as good as an M3 coupe, so i can fully understand if you dont like the shape of wagons lol
it is not faster, its as comfortable, they ar ethe same and the bmw is faster. the engine capacity does not determine the speed, it is how they tune it, the bmw tune the engines way bettart than mercedes,
i know it is, but the bmw is a much better car, fuel economy is better, handling is better. i have driven the cars, acceleration is not that much of a difference. i had more fun in the bmw. if mercedes were to give me a million bucks and that car i will take the bmw. :)
i know,pp just look at how fast they are...sad,mercedes dosent base its self in speed as much as bmw.yet it can still beat bmw at its own game.wich is sad.plus all the extra awsome stuff.bmw=boring interior...and almost everything cept speed...but not by much even..
the merc is the slightly faster accelerating in a straight line because of the slightly more powerful engine(despite it's considerable advantage in displacement) and the more comfortable choice, and that's about it, whereas the BMW is the more exciting, sportier, faster in reality, more modern looking car without the image of a fat, bold pensionist in Austria!
240p again
MrAuSquared 3 months ago
MB= 65+ Driver's!!!
BMW= 18+ Driver's!!!
670lamborghini 7 months ago
@670lamborghini im 18 and i drive a mercedes E320 2008 and i will always drive in a mercedes. you should do it to! its a pussy magnet
jijdom 4 months ago
can you make this video in better quallity?
4814EMan 8 months ago
German engineering: Comfort, Beauty, Power, Performance
munteanuraul 10 months ago
shit quality
xXIGUNNERIXx 11 months ago
i choose the amg i dont want satnav lady in my ear
theoriginalstig7 1 year ago
y the hell did he brimg them into a field?Its such a shame to do that to such awesome cars
GreenDayRulz4Life100 1 year ago
its like watching this video through tracing paper
ArinOngunTV 1 year ago
BMW wins this
krk1211 1 year ago
this mercedes looks like car for women not for man i prefer bmw :D cause i am a man :D
kidman363 1 year ago
Could have been clearer
chrinny123 1 year ago
2:38 . The Killers YEAH!
XLStress 1 year ago
v10 station wagon = epic win
r0dnee 1 year ago
i subbed,subb back
RnB123100 1 year ago
bmw and mb r crap.. and rs6 could kill ur asses jajaja
elite1performance 1 year ago
@elite1performance You say that, but 0-60 is exactly the same as the M5, they're both limited to 155, and delimited the RS6 has a smaller top speed than the M5. It may have nearly 70 more HP, but it weighs over a 100 kilos more.
Besides, there's a new M5 coming with a twin turbo V8 - 555 BHP. And 50 kilos lighter than the one now. Love to see the RS6 match that.
NobleM15fan 1 year ago
@NobleM15fan you think that the rs6 its gonna be like that forever¿? rs6 its heavier thats why 0-60 its the same.. come on.. m5 could not even with the q7 v12¿? and its like 800 kilos heavier.. haha.. wait for the next generation of audi- rs6 its a v10 twin turbo : 570hp "for now.." and don`t worry we will see that match...BMW ITS JUST USING THE SAME ENGINE FOR ALL THE LINE.. THATS THE SAME THAT X5M AND X6M.
elroriveraify 1 year ago
@elroriveraify I know it won't be like that forever - but Audis are very heavy cars. Even their R8 sueprcar is (basically a fast TT).
So what if the engine in the new M5 is the same as the X5-X6-M? The engine in the basic R8 is the same as the RS4. It's a good engine - so why make more than you need to? I wouldn't bother.
The RS6 now has a twin turbo V10 with 570 BHP. And it's still slower than the M5 released 5 years ago. M3 & M5 = still the best sports saloons in the world.
NobleM15fan 1 year ago
@NobleM15fan It`ll be interesting to see the new M5 with the rumored twin turbo 8cyl
HoleToHeaven 1 year ago
@HoleToHeaven I've got a video featuring it if you're interested. Opinions are split currently - some people think a smaller boosted engine is the way to go; others think they should've put twin turbos on the 5 litre V10. Whatever, I'm sure it'll be brilliant: there's never been a bad M5.
NobleM15fan 1 year ago
MB=Szabina
BMW=timi turo burduf orda sajt telemea haromszogusajt fustoltsajt
kopaszQ 1 year ago
4:37 whats the song??
mgs22222222222222222 1 year ago
They put AMG engines in station wagons ?? wow
smokenfly514 1 year ago
BMW = Pepsi
MB = coca cola
tom80cruise 1 year ago 10
Agree
zharifzaini 1 year ago
@tom80cruise lmfao same thing
alexkvaskov 1 year ago
@tom80cruise AMG = Merlot
snapnrool 1 year ago
@tom80cruise So you´re claiming that pepsi is better then coca cola? You must be wrong...
queenzortje 11 months ago
@tom80cruise well coca cola is known everywhere around the world but i think pepsi is better
OmGhostable 10 months ago
@tom80cruise
i like Pepsi more
Helghast470 10 months ago
@tom80cruise so ur saying its based purely on personal choice??...if so i say agreed...to each their own
bosh8867 3 months ago
Just buy a BMW (they are the best cars in the world)
theBMW8tgu 1 year ago
Mercedes Benz rules
forexams 2 years ago
@forexams BMW is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better than Mercedes (you are wrong)
theBMW8tgu 1 year ago
But you have to remember everytime MB (AMG, Brabus) want to beat Bmw (M Division) they've always had to go for a bigger displacement or even Forced Induction. I Love both MB and BMW, but I would rather take the Bmw to track or cruising, and the MB for family, or take the missus out. Hey everyone has their own opinions. MB has always been luxurious, comfort etc.. Bmw has been more performance, and race bred. Just my 2cents..
kaizaM30b35 2 years ago 29
na bro bmw is better now a days u have to pay for cup holderbulls shits in the mb
kaabiano 2 years ago
not like bmw is much better. u have to pay for a piece of shit iDrive system that never works the way u want it to. i would have the new Audi RS6 Avant. lot more power, better navigation system, good bang & olufsen sound system.
Topgear557 2 years ago
Audi <3
Sceno1 2 years ago
Comment removed
red33m23 2 years ago
Yeah but Mercedes has more torque...So as far as I concern ..Mercedes is better.
I like BMW though...but I love Mercedes..
red33m23 2 years ago 2
@kaizaM30b35 With N/A engine it become harder to power extra power every body now that if bmw make 5.0 v10 MB don't have to 5.0 v10 if you think like that you'd be fool every company had there style MB was always better in sport and comfort bmw doesn't have the bulls to even make a sport car like sls , slr and the sl65 ,clk63 black series they all have a track number better than all bmw cars and the most powerful bmw is bmw 760li with 544 hp it had 6.0 v12 biturbo and you say it had profomance
whitewizard8820000 1 year ago
nicer screen quality but any way no probs
gregoomen 2 years ago 2
honestly, how can you watch this??
torod213 2 years ago 3
So MERCEDES wins.. hands down!!!
stevomwa 2 years ago 3
did he say the merc has more power than mexico?
lol
creepinshadow247 2 years ago 2
yes lol
hahahaha
kaicos 2 years ago
big benzz wins always
mooazz 2 years ago
I think Ford should make a sports saloon - they have the racing pedigree, and they understand what the European petrolhead wants from a car.
They could take the supercharged 5.4 litre V8 from the GT supercar, and put it in the Mondeo. Call it the Mondeo RSX.
In the here and now though, if you want a big, fast sports saloon, I think you should choose betwwen the M5, the XF-R, and the VXR8 Barthurst.
NobleM15fan 2 years ago
3:08 was classic
jgpwlcs36 2 years ago
whats the song at 6:48
amorrow794 2 years ago
yeah what is the music in the background? :D
Spanners11Rules 2 years ago
Both of these cars in my opinion are sub-zero !
Just like the airport
BingobONGOyesyo 2 years ago 3
what is the song at 7:30???
tomby1983 2 years ago
You said it only has a V8 under the hood but the V8 is more powerful
1994adnan 2 years ago
actually the M5 V10 produces 507bhp contray to what clarkson said. So both engines produce the same power....
Hennerz2007 2 years ago 2
we need an XFR Estate!!!!
eminzide 2 years ago
We can hope. Did Jaguar make an estate version of that horrible S Type?
NobleM15fan 2 years ago
Only Saloon shape for the S-Type....... but the R version still can do battle with the M's and AMG's cars.......except the looks department....
eminzide 2 years ago
I don't like the S Type - the new XF is much better. The purists will tell you an estate sullies the bloodline, but I disagree - if it still drives as well as the saloon, which both cars in this video clearly do.
NobleM15fan 2 years ago
yea they did. I beleive they also did a review about it. its a terrible car.
biggametizo 2 years ago
The only sports saloon worth breathing in the same breath as the M5 is the Jaguar XF-R. The Caddy CTS-V is nice, but to my mind a sports saloon has to come from a company with a history in motorsport. There has never been a Cadillac F1 car; there has never been a Cadillac Rally car; there has never been a Cadillac Touring car. Cadillac, stick with luxury: it's what you're best at. Leave the sports saloons to Jaguar and BMW.
NobleM15fan 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
edgtex 2 years ago
Mercedes all the way
soccervms101 2 years ago
i work at bmw!
onemanarmy34 2 years ago
and? Why should I care?
torod213 2 years ago
im really dislike assholes
onemanarmy34 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes, I know you are an asshole!
torod213 2 years ago
the quality is really poooooor
pmkrefeld 2 years ago 3
both bad ass cars...
jessedlangel 2 years ago
This is werid, I know Clarkson is a bit of a Mercedes fanboy, so maybe that explains it.
I know for a fact the E63 is only quicker than an M5 up to about 80 miles an hour.
After that, the M5s top end power and much better gearing blow the E63 away, every time.
It literally just happened at Race Legal at Qualcomm Stadium an hour ago, run after run.
I smell a rat.....
1973MaseratiBora 2 years ago
maybe the extra weight and bad aerodynamics suit the more torque of the AMG engine thus providing the greater top speed
jenkomagic 2 years ago
7:24 what the name of song
pleeeeees any one ? :)
sharket741 2 years ago
The Chemical Brothers
Saturate
esvcg 2 years ago
agreed, the bmw steers and drives better while the "top model" of the arch rivals is not far behind and when it comes for full throtle, its quicker
however in my eyes better steering and braking parameters make the m5 more facinating cos l am rarely driving over 250km/h and l fancy disel power plants anyway
appologies for my spelling
f7nh7v 2 years ago
instead of arguing about which is better , the audi or merc or bmw, why don't we all agree that they're great wagons, and say amen for well built cars, and well engineered cars
SUM414243444546 2 years ago
You're right - it's rare that an estate version drives as well as the saloon, but BMW and Mercedes have pulled it off, and so did Audi with the RS6.
NobleM15fan 2 years ago 13
@NobleM15fan As well as the Lexus IS300 sportcross, although ugly and a bit heavier, the weight distribution is actually better than the sedan. It's quite nice in the corners
HoleToHeaven 1 year ago
@HoleToHeaven I'm not a fan of Lexus. Although I do respect them - the ISF is their first ever sports saloon, and they did do a good job. I wouldn't choose to by the IS300, but if someone gave me one I'd be happy.
NobleM15fan 1 year ago
@NobleM15fan
That's fair enough, to each his own. I owned a 328 and now own an IS300 and i'll take the IS everyday of the week, to be honest o got boredof the 328, but the IS i love everyday. The ISF is a great car, and although overpriced the LFA is a great supercar. I've also driven both the Wagon and sedan version of the IS300 and the handling is better in the wagon, but it doesn't make up for the hideousness of it compared to the in my opinion, strikingly stylish sedan
HoleToHeaven 1 year ago
@HoleToHeaven Fair enough, Lexus do make good cars. Except for that SC430 - that was horrible in almost every way. The LFA is gorgeous and a great car - but it costs twice as much as the equally gorgeous and even faster Ferrari 458. And no one's going to buy a Lexus over a Ferrari. They should've done what Nissan did with the GTR - undercut their rivals in price.
NobleM15fan 1 year ago
@NobleM15fan agreed, the sc430 is junk, other than the engine, but the rest was junk. Apparently people did buy the LFA over ferrari's cause all 499 are sold already. But it is too much, your paying because its exclusive. And they're actually losing money on that car, the R&D that went into the LFA took 9 years and was completely redesigned twice. so i guess if you want a car basically no one else has (10) in all of canada and about 40 in the states so thats what u pay for i guess
HoleToHeaven 1 year ago
@HoleToHeaven I do like the LF-A - it's such a shame that after all that work, it will probably turn into another XJ200 - a complete failiure. I hope Lexus try it again - they entered the sports saloon market well enough with the IS-F.
NobleM15fan 1 year ago
@NobleM15fan
The XJ200 was a flop because it didnt deliver on the promises made. it still ended up being an awesome car but no AWD and no V12 (both promised to preorder customers) never went to the production model. The LFA was delivered as promised, albeit 10 years after the mission was started, and thats why every car built for the first year sold. That and limited production
HoleToHeaven 1 year ago
@NobleM15fan - or, in the RS6's case, to make the saloon as crap as the estate... such an overrated car. OK, so it's big and comfortable (up to a point) and fast in a straight line, but the E63 leaves it for dead on a windy road or a track, and the M5 leaves the E63 for dead too.
EccentricRichard 7 months ago
I would have the M5. For its drive, it would be my choice. I wouldn't blame anyone for choosing the Mercedes, it is a very good car. To be honest, they're both really good, but the M5 would be my choice.
NobleM15fan 2 years ago
id rather buy an aston second hand that getting them :P
FootiefanJJ 2 years ago
Get away!
TheLn14 2 years ago
i hope your boss is not to keen on being on time because you AM is gonna break down every week XD
Muadddibb 2 years ago
Comment removed
hozo22 2 years ago
shut the fuck up
diego750il 2 years ago
Neither of them,I prefer the Audi Rs 6,its better,more powerfullmore faster,better looking,makes a better sound,more comfortable,i'm not saying the merc or beemer are rubbish,i'm saying that the Audi does it better.
TheHaos1 2 years ago
totally
kaiserschon 2 years ago
i 100% agree
38KTMracer 2 years ago
I disagree. The Audi RS6 costs £10 000 more than these two, and despite having much more power, has the same 0-60 time and the same top speed as the M5 (204 mph). It's also not as practical.
NobleM15fan 2 years ago
Well,that's your opinion,and that was mine,i still prefer it,afterall,you can have all the money in the world,you won't buy the best car,you'll buy the car you lik,and i like the Rs6 more tan the other two.Heck,i prefer a Lancia Stratos to the BMW,even though they are not in the same cathegory,the BMW leaves me cold and the Merc dosn't put a smle on my face,the RS6 does.
TheHaos1 2 years ago
Both are lovely wagons..no doubt..
RashOnno 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
a porsche cayenne GTS can do 280 km/hr n go offroad
so there4 its a much better car than either of em
trainsarvind 2 years ago
BMW FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
XionUnjust 2 years ago
For some reason in my mind these are absolutely pointless vehicles. I mean it seems that turning a BMW into a wagon pretty much defeats the purpose of a BMW. If you want a family oriented, ugly wagon just get a Volvo and be done with it. Admit to yourself that you are a family man and own a bland car made for children instead of driving. I guess I really hate wagons. LOL
craigmak 2 years ago
Well i might agree that a high-performance wagon is pointless, but a BMW wagon most certainly is not. I dont even have to ask b/c i know you have never driven a BMW sport wagon before. You'd be surprised at what wagons are capable of nowadays (much better drivers than SUVs and minivans too). If you think wagons are ugly then that's your opinion which i cant change, but trust me, my friend, BMW and Mercedes wagons are certainly not "pointless".
4MATICbenz 2 years ago
Yes, i would definitely agree that a wagon is a much better choice than a mini van or SUV. Mini vans are absolutely the worst and ugliest vehicles on the road and SUVs are totally pointless as well because most of them can't even go off road. So what is the point of an SUV that has to stay on pavement? Dumb!! I have always liked coupes and drive an M3 so I guess i'm pretty prejudice against the looks and performance of anything bigger than a sedan.
craigmak 2 years ago
Well then, it's no surprise an M3 driver isnt very fond of wagons lol. But i was trying to point out that wagons can put up almost as good performance stats as their sedan counterparts. But i cant think of any wagons that look as good as an M3 coupe, so i can fully understand if you dont like the shape of wagons lol
4MATICbenz 2 years ago
whats the song at 4:37?
xXjackolegendXx 2 years ago
Faster, safer, higher quality, reliable, better fuel economy ( check for urselft) etc
MERCEDES E CLASS > bmw 5
stevomwa 2 years ago 2
The E class is more comfortable, more pratical, faster and has more beautiful interiors and esteriors...it is the best one!!
Andrea1491to 2 years ago
it is not faster, its as comfortable, they ar ethe same and the bmw is faster. the engine capacity does not determine the speed, it is how they tune it, the bmw tune the engines way bettart than mercedes,
VanillaCokeIndianSty 2 years ago
It's not like you said...you will change your mind after trying them both...:)
Andrea1491to 2 years ago
the BMW is slower .... he even shows you in the video
tomparko1 2 years ago
i know it is, but the bmw is a much better car, fuel economy is better, handling is better. i have driven the cars, acceleration is not that much of a difference. i had more fun in the bmw. if mercedes were to give me a million bucks and that car i will take the bmw. :)
VanillaCokeIndianSty 2 years ago
i know,pp just look at how fast they are...sad,mercedes dosent base its self in speed as much as bmw.yet it can still beat bmw at its own game.wich is sad.plus all the extra awsome stuff.bmw=boring interior...and almost everything cept speed...but not by much even..
keenth7 2 years ago
the merc is the slightly faster accelerating in a straight line because of the slightly more powerful engine(despite it's considerable advantage in displacement) and the more comfortable choice, and that's about it, whereas the BMW is the more exciting, sportier, faster in reality, more modern looking car without the image of a fat, bold pensionist in Austria!
keptnplanet 2 years ago
The merc is the best, faster,less complicated,more comfortable more practical more powerfull and easier to use
CheeseWhirlingManiac 2 years ago 3
But which one is the winner???
I bet on the BMW M5...
haziqdaF1fanatic 2 years ago
The merc is the winner my dear...did you hear what geremy said?
Andrea1491to 2 years ago
i think the bmw is better looking... in my opinion.. and its "jeremy"..
pornyelite74 2 years ago
He also said it was nicer to drive, and cheaper.
NobleM15fan 2 years ago
yeah right a merc would kill you with oversteers
gagopj 2 years ago
HD MAN !!!!
osticBG 2 years ago
Quality sux
briantono 2 years ago
get some quality mate !!!!
ry4n0007 2 years ago
love the E-class
junglestar82 2 years ago