Added: 3 years ago
From: fizzicsorg
Views: 100,921
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i wish that my subjects in the school become English so i can understand this shit :P

  • You'd think by the time you were in Second year electrical and electronic engineering at university you wouldnt have to hit up youtube for this..

  • nepsol.blogspot.com

    This guy is bringing up circuits solution guys!!!

  • Nice frame rate.

  • @mrmillion94 Just wait till a2... magnetic induction

  • Seriously, Youtube has taught me far more then school has... Funny thing is, My school BLOCKS youtube on the computers.... Kinda ironic.

  • AS physics is amazing

    This video was useful (thanks)

  • this is so useful thank you sir.

  • @mrmillion94 why thank him when "god" didnt invent youtube :P

  • @Legendhalfliferrr

     I believe he did, indirectly...

  • JACK JOHNSON! and physics :D

  • as an AS level candidate... I LOVE YOU!

  • I'm over caffeinated

  • Very Nice...thank you....keep goinig

  • Electrical study is MORE than just connecting wires. You might know how to run wires to a new circuit but THAT IS NOT ENOUGH. Without the knowledge of electrical law & calculations your work can not pass as safe. Working on electrical installations without knowing the behavior of electricity is VARY DANGEROUS. You REALLY have to know how current flows and behaves in regards to the grounding system + TONS of other things. Study stuff like this video.

  • @LordVoltRod2c CAPITAL LETTERS

  • are you kidding me...? I want 2 minutes of my life back.

  • @DanielDJAoun What else would you be doing with your two minutes?

  • fag

  • Was helpful, very thanks!!

  • thank you verymuch, that was quite helpful

  • NYC VID

    

  • He took a long time to say nothing. LOL

  • @Potemtole well he helped me understand it

  • @KKinsane2009 the reason the ammeters are flickering is their uncertainty, if you would care to take that into account. the experiment will have its reading errors, and these have to be calculated after. i am sure this scientist knows this, and at the time when he said they were the same, they actually did read the same value. the reason we take uncertainty measurements in experiments is because of the uncertainty in the instrument we are using to measure.

  • @Exutus LOL! not what your thinking.

    VD= Voltage Drop.

  • ok fine ignore your eyes, i'm pointing out what I see, and tbh i'm sick of supposed scientists claiming one thing when the instruments show another. "bla bla until you build one for an affordable" i'll dig the metal out the ground arrange it at the fricking nano scale and prove you wrong if I must but tbh your being a dick. instead of beating on me how about you explain why the fuck they DON'T match...

  • what about wheatstone network

  • I hate to point this out but the moment you say "you can clearly see the ammeters read the same value" they are not infact reading the same value. one is .26 one is .25, not that it really matters I suppose.

  • What a stupid remark... If u succeed in building 2 amp-meters, for an affordable price, which can put out the exact same resistence, to the mOhm, then we'll talk again. Untill then you'll have to do it with conventional amp-meters, and less then completely accurate resistances

  • @KKinsane2009 and Stealths comment , rude as it is, is correct. If you don't factor in the resistance of the test leads you will be close. But you will not be exact. But when you are measuring a difference of 250mV and 230mV.... that's pretty close.

  • @KKinsane2009 You're right, it really doesn't matter, as long as it's close to totaling the source voltage. There will be varying voltages because of the varying resistances on the circuit conductors. If the VD was considered in this simple exercise you would be able to see a more accurate display. So with VD out of the picture you'll have 480mA flowing conventional into the parallel node and splitting 250mA and 230mA between each componant, then reuniting back to the source.

  • @gyneman sorry

    mV ---- not mA

  • Kirchhoff is spell liked this. In Physics for Scientist and Engineers. Pg 785.

  • VERY USEFUL

    The explanation in the text book and the lab manual was driving me crazy

    THANK YOU

  • good

  • i love the ending song veri nice

  • very helpful. thanks!

  • I can't understand why the books I have don't start with this explanation? They state the law. Then say thats easy lets make it hard for them to get the jest of it. I know its probably my small brain but come on.

  • THX GOD!!! THXs YOU!!!

  • nice!!

  • Thanks, ur a lifesaver

  • he's my great great grand father... BTW 2 H's

  • Brilliant stuff!!! 5 stars... please we need more!

  • yes im at college and this is very helpful

    thanks

  • This is brilliant; I want to understand more about electrical applications and circuits and this explains things one video at a time!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more