what do you expect? the 2.2 perkins diesel offered in the ranger in 1983 had a whopping 59 horsepower... the base, gas, manual everything, 2wd ranger weighs 2800 pounds, this example probably weighs over 3100 pounds because of the diesel... it's gonna be slow... the next slowest ranger is the one with the 2.0 gas engine based off of the 2.3... but it was only offered on base models so there was potential... i've had mine all the way past 85 and (the needle) touching the peg at the bottom...
That motor is beat I guess, I used to have a 1984 2.2 Diesel, I could do 60 in 18 secs. It was slow for sure but I could get 80 out of her 85 downhill... hahaha. But that was back in 2002 so my truck was only 18 years old...
Damn man ... no wonder everyone in america thinks diesels are trash if thats what they were entering the passenger market with. I had a 1-litre petrol fuelled car that could have kicked your ass twice and been home in time for lunch... Hell I think I've been on faster buses. You're moving like a Leyland panel van.
Please tell us there's something wrong with it? :-)
Haha my Geo Metro beat this and gets 55mpg, not dissing at all I love rangers, got an `87 myself but with the 2.0 carb engine... its a turd but cant kill it!
rangers are pretty good i had an 86 with a 2.9l and it would kick some ass it took no time to get it up to speed i used to love that truck but i sold it o well
To my ear it sounds like you are waiting too long for the shift. Try shifting earlier and see if you don't get better results. Even diesels with rotary injection pumps don't really need to be wound up tight.
Nice! Is that a 5 speed? I have an 82 Mazda B2200 - same engine with a 5 speed and a 3.90. It'll do about 0-60. Oh, you want a time for that? Whenever it feels like it. 0-60 time = about 25 seconds if at all, but then I haven't managed to time it... too busy driving and shifting. Great video and it sounds like you've got a good runner! Keep it up!
why does everyone talk shit on here my god its a diesel ranger they wernt designed to be fast i had,i wish i never would have sold it, an 1987 diesel ranger which was a 2.3L with a turbo,it had a/c a sliding rear window fancy right? n it was a beast it turnd 35 inch tall tires at a top speed of 70mph, damn i think thats highway speed ha.
Sweetamoth you fuckig retard I proboallu drove a car four thousand times nicer than yours you fuck tard I drive an Infiniti i30 so take your shitbox and shove it up your ass past the dildo that's already stuck in the there you shit head
Trying to act all badass with your Infiniti I30? The I30 is(was) Infiniti's entry-level car, aka the Infiniti for the man/woman that couldn't afford a real Inifiti. Because all the I30 really is, is a rebaged (and barely redesigned) Nissan Maxima. So....can't act so tough now with your rebadged Maxima. And before you even try saying I don't have my own car or any bullshit like that. I do, I own a 1999 Chevy Tahoe LS, and I'm 16. And yes, my Chevy is worth more than your Inifiti.
I didn't get to finish typing (ran out of space) but your Inifiti is worth about $6,300 if it's in MINT condition (Assuming it is). And my Tahoe is worth $8,800 in MINT condition (And it is in mint). Those prices are assuming that both cars have 100,000 miles on them.
my grandfather has a1985 dodge ram 100 with a 3.7 liter inline 6 engine in it that would stomp that damn thing. and that truck is fricking slow too. but damn at least his truck will do a highway speed!!
You better regear that ranger with those tires. I got a 93 3.0 with 32s and 3.73s and under completely normal driving I took off on a hill and the spider gears in the rear end popped. It wouldnt even pull my driveway in reverse. I hate the damn 3.slow. I only got like 10 mpg with it.
the size of the motor has nothing to do with it, the 32inch tires and 3:73s did, Im assuming that you still have the 7.5 rear and stock gears, and being a 93 they probably have 200,000+ miles on them, this is a common problem with the 7.5 rear end with 3:73s
The 3.0 isn't that powerful of an engine (my car has it and i like it) but I would be afraid of anything bigger than stock tires. Especially with a manual transmission.
its not to bad, the motor can handle the tires, its the 7.5 is made for economy and on road stuff. We swapped in a dana 44 front and an 9inch in our old 3.0 and we dont have any problems with power
I am a Dodge/Chrysler/Plymouth/Jeep/Eagle/Studebaker*/Nash*/Hupmobile* master certified heavy-line journeyman auto mechanic and this video is NOT a fake. In fact that one runs pretty good.
My brother is a Ford tech across the street from my shop and I was having lunch with him in a new one of these he was test driving. The owner thought something was wrong because it was so slow. Nothing was wrong, they are just dangerously slow. Hands-down it was the slowest car I have ever seen.
Wow. But on the bright side- if you ever get a speeding ticket, you can just go to court and tell the judge you have a diesel Ranger. Ticket dropped!
brealistic1970 2 weeks ago
I think you forgot the handbrake
PierreNgo 1 month ago in playlist Awesome V8 Sound
i have the same truck but mines slower lol
ggstinnet 1 month ago
worlds fastest truck
09adge13 2 months ago
Nice roll-on acceleration from 55-60 in only 30 seconds. Finally...something slower than my chevette!
bigman55434 2 months ago
what do you expect? the 2.2 perkins diesel offered in the ranger in 1983 had a whopping 59 horsepower... the base, gas, manual everything, 2wd ranger weighs 2800 pounds, this example probably weighs over 3100 pounds because of the diesel... it's gonna be slow... the next slowest ranger is the one with the 2.0 gas engine based off of the 2.3... but it was only offered on base models so there was potential... i've had mine all the way past 85 and (the needle) touching the peg at the bottom...
jistuart 3 months ago
slow........ for a car from 1983
Neee35 3 months ago
when the driver says give me a minute, he means it!
ehood7654 4 months ago
This makes my jeep look like a damn dragster xD
Warriorsauce 4 months ago
YOU CAN DO IT!!!
smallengine13 6 months ago
That motor is beat I guess, I used to have a 1984 2.2 Diesel, I could do 60 in 18 secs. It was slow for sure but I could get 80 out of her 85 downhill... hahaha. But that was back in 2002 so my truck was only 18 years old...
brodieboy2008 7 months ago
where you able to get it to 70 lol
GoGoggansGo 8 months ago 3
this is hard to watch....
bhspirate2004 8 months ago 2
Would you be willing to sell this?
Hotrodx199 8 months ago
I bet this thing pisses on corvettes!
donbomb92 9 months ago 2
needs a turbo bad
falaqdad15 9 months ago
Damn man ... no wonder everyone in america thinks diesels are trash if thats what they were entering the passenger market with. I had a 1-litre petrol fuelled car that could have kicked your ass twice and been home in time for lunch... Hell I think I've been on faster buses. You're moving like a Leyland panel van.
Please tell us there's something wrong with it? :-)
TahreyUK 9 months ago
any faster you will start seeing engine parts falling out of the bottom
dkhazardcounty01 10 months ago
I have an 83 as well and it goes way faster than this and it is stock and everything.
dieselranger83 11 months ago
I got 1:05.59 for your 0-60. Thats gotta be a slow record!!
Motorfordtoyota 11 months ago
theirs an old diesel ranger around town... i swear i see it broke down more then i see it running...
mageac 11 months ago
that literally made me sick
satbmx4life 1 year ago
That thang is fast!!!
177932 1 year ago
I do believe Sammy Hagar wrote a song about this...
humanparody12 1 year ago 2
you think the possibility of a turbo on that could help?
gizmo98550 1 year ago
Sure was stuck on 55 for a while lol
randombk82894 1 year ago
you runnin the stock engine in this? sounds like ole detroit
2strokedetroit 1 year ago
I feel better about my F150 now...
1995fordf150 1 year ago
it sounds like a friggin deuce and a half
hundvonkrieg 1 year ago
I just watched a 0-60 of a diesel rabbit and said it was borderline dangerous, this IS dangerously slow.
71GSX455 1 year ago
@71GSX455 ROTFLMAO!!!!
thedude420h20 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not too shabby at all.
MoAoX 1 year ago
was this all the way to the floor?
TheDylan222222 1 year ago
wow, how can you control such a beast?
KLewisChef 1 year ago 2
i got one question where did u get the crome dash plate at????
Funkyskunk03 1 year ago
@Funkyskunk03 if its wat i have for my ranger its not chrome, silver like and it should be a stock gauge panel on some rangers
bigbad302 1 year ago
@bigbad302 yea thats what i was talking about my has one with a word grain look to it but i like the silver 10 times better lol
Funkyskunk03 1 year ago
@Funkyskunk03 yeah me too looks more race like
bigbad302 1 year ago
Awww, little truck that could. I'd still dig having one of those old Rangers, especially the diesels.
randy25rhoads 1 year ago
how do you get on the highway????
joeldude76 1 year ago
@joeldude76, very carefully, XD
SpiritsoftheWolf 1 year ago
@joeldude76 just give him a minute
2002j30a1 1 year ago 12
You need a turbo or 2!
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
wow i thought my plymouth voyager mini van was slow. check out slowest acceleration
drummingman23 1 year ago
0-55 in 30 seconds pretty rough 55-60 in 30 seconds, im guesing thats his top speed
edawg305 1 year ago
Ya the Diesels they put in the rangers in the early 80s wasnt a great engine lol.....you should pull that out and drop a cummins in it :D
AllAlaskan907 1 year ago
Haha my Geo Metro beat this and gets 55mpg, not dissing at all I love rangers, got an `87 myself but with the 2.0 carb engine... its a turd but cant kill it!
chad8329 1 year ago
well it would beat a dodge
GamingCrazily 1 year ago
Wait your not pulling a fully loaded Bus behind you? hahahaha thats so sick
OgCoda 1 year ago
Back to 80's have No Turbo, that why this is slow. If you add a turbo in it, you will feel a BIG difference.
kenneykole 1 year ago
jesus lmao good luck merging onto the highway with that!
kraziazn90 1 year ago
Diesel trucks are not known for acceleration, unless of course you trick em out
kpaadj 1 year ago
"This is the vehicle's top speed" - the Terminator
Arundodonax 1 year ago 2
@Arundodonax LOL! Excellent comment... I loved how in the movie the truck was only going 60 mph when he said that
Tuneman1984 1 year ago
wow, you to throw a turbo or two on there! Fuck thats slow!
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
rangers are pretty good i had an 86 with a 2.9l and it would kick some ass it took no time to get it up to speed i used to love that truck but i sold it o well
cotywheelhorse 1 year ago
i could make a sandwich eat it and come back here it probably wouldn't make it to 60
vistauploader 1 year ago
0-60 in 62 seconds, not bad!
jet62095 1 year ago 3
Is that a 5 speed? What engine is it, 2.2?
basstech01 2 years ago
To my ear it sounds like you are waiting too long for the shift. Try shifting earlier and see if you don't get better results. Even diesels with rotary injection pumps don't really need to be wound up tight.
mike
lovesavacuum 2 years ago
@lovesavacuum The real problem is once it hits 50, 55.
rudolphna54 1 year ago
Nice! Is that a 5 speed? I have an 82 Mazda B2200 - same engine with a 5 speed and a 3.90. It'll do about 0-60. Oh, you want a time for that? Whenever it feels like it. 0-60 time = about 25 seconds if at all, but then I haven't managed to time it... too busy driving and shifting. Great video and it sounds like you've got a good runner! Keep it up!
daninoregon79 2 years ago
Love it!! 5/5
youtoobe169 2 years ago
not bad man keep on trucking
killroy360 2 years ago
Haha thats faster than my 240D Benz, i can get up to 70 on highway but i get 35 mpg so what does it matter?
MckeeBoyzRule 2 years ago
why does everyone talk shit on here my god its a diesel ranger they wernt designed to be fast i had,i wish i never would have sold it, an 1987 diesel ranger which was a 2.3L with a turbo,it had a/c a sliding rear window fancy right? n it was a beast it turnd 35 inch tall tires at a top speed of 70mph, damn i think thats highway speed ha.
yamahaman123 2 years ago
Comment removed
djamptronr 2 years ago
Comment removed
djamptronr 2 years ago
This little truck sounds like a big rig! That's awsome!
neurocytohemotoxic 2 years ago
hi did not say it would be fast
Pharell1234 2 years ago
Sweetamoth you fuckig retard I proboallu drove a car four thousand times nicer than yours you fuck tard I drive an Infiniti i30 so take your shitbox and shove it up your ass past the dildo that's already stuck in the there you shit head
djamptronr 2 years ago
Trying to act all badass with your Infiniti I30? The I30 is(was) Infiniti's entry-level car, aka the Infiniti for the man/woman that couldn't afford a real Inifiti. Because all the I30 really is, is a rebaged (and barely redesigned) Nissan Maxima. So....can't act so tough now with your rebadged Maxima. And before you even try saying I don't have my own car or any bullshit like that. I do, I own a 1999 Chevy Tahoe LS, and I'm 16. And yes, my Chevy is worth more than your Inifiti.
LVGshultz 2 years ago
I didn't get to finish typing (ran out of space) but your Inifiti is worth about $6,300 if it's in MINT condition (Assuming it is). And my Tahoe is worth $8,800 in MINT condition (And it is in mint). Those prices are assuming that both cars have 100,000 miles on them.
LVGshultz 2 years ago
BURT! mines a 93 escort! 2500 bitches! got it for 1500 so i already made money, oh and i get 35 mph on the highway
hippo459 2 years ago
BURN! hahh i have a 93 escort wagon worth 2500 woo! get it for 1500, so im makin money, and i get 35 MPG bitches.
hippo459 2 years ago
So do you floor it everwhere you go?
Straightup28 2 years ago
Comment removed
chibichan1701 2 years ago
i have taken a shit that goes from 0 - 60 faster than that
djamptronr 2 years ago 66
i taken that you havent drivin a truck nor know that its diesel(that doesnt have any mods to it + look at its age)
so go and play with your shit box ricers
sweetmamoth 2 years ago
@djamptronr But did your poop get 35 miles to the gallon? =)
joedrummer2010 1 year ago 2
lol, it sound good anyways
BeboAltizer 2 years ago
where the desel rangers sold in the us
gavin4ford 2 years ago
I'll race you with my uncles 89 geo metro!
lol
degaik 2 years ago
Needs more fuel and a turbo, then she'll move.
Hotrodx199 2 years ago 2
i was gonna have one as a feild truck but that would not have been as fun as i thought!! was an awesome looking truck though
wolftube02 2 years ago
my grandfather has a1985 dodge ram 100 with a 3.7 liter inline 6 engine in it that would stomp that damn thing. and that truck is fricking slow too. but damn at least his truck will do a highway speed!!
TheTerminator310 2 years ago
i bought a new ram in 2005 i could floor it and it would take about 2 minutes to get to 70
farmboy184 2 years ago 2
would this even hit 65? haha. it couldnt even be highway driven. slow as fuck
drewman12321 2 years ago
Sounds good but Goddamn it is slow.
rudolphna54 2 years ago 2
What does this thing get for mileage?
Righty736 2 years ago
My '86 Toyota Pickup has a 2L diesel, and does 0-60 in 20 secs!
robinmasters87 2 years ago
I can do it in just over 10 in my 60bhp ford!
tpvalley 2 years ago
But I bet it gets good mileage eh? :)
focusonthegreen 2 years ago
aaahaha...thats just awesome man. I know how you feel...though my '84 Town Car does 0-60MPH in 21sec.....just a tiny bit faster than this....LOL
strumem90 2 years ago
the diesel was an option on the ford ranger in the 80's
johnnyfever1975 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have a stock 1983 diesel ranger and it will do 0-60 way faster than this one. there must be something wrong with this one.
oliver1950gmpuller 2 years ago
Comment removed
oliver1950gmpuller 2 years ago
Does it pull good? I didn't know that you could put a diesel in a Ford Ranger. Damn its slow!
myw9 2 years ago
gosh it took you 1:06 minutes to get to 60 how sad
sammy1995021 2 years ago 3
Time to put in a VNT turbocharger!!
zech007 2 years ago
So what, you are still getting better miles per gallon.
wertyh11 2 years ago 2
At least you'd win against a civic
cyberfreakct38 2 years ago 55
ahah! omg that is awesome!
Tube7686 2 years ago
@cyberfreakct38 lmfao
2002j30a1 1 year ago
@cyberfreakct38 haha, true
Macdaddy3354 1 year ago
@cyberfreakct38 not even..
WillDaBeast696969 1 year ago
@cyberfreakct38 lol idk
TheDylan222222 1 year ago
damn...haha i thought my 3.0 ranger on 31 inch tires was terrible but that was ridiculous. turn up the fuel!
yerbetteroffdead 2 years ago
You better regear that ranger with those tires. I got a 93 3.0 with 32s and 3.73s and under completely normal driving I took off on a hill and the spider gears in the rear end popped. It wouldnt even pull my driveway in reverse. I hate the damn 3.slow. I only got like 10 mpg with it.
Jacksonkellyfreak 2 years ago
hahaha i already did blow my spider gears up. got a new rear end out of a 98 ranger still 3.73 gears. i did it by spinning through the mud too much.
yerbetteroffdead 2 years ago
the size of the motor has nothing to do with it, the 32inch tires and 3:73s did, Im assuming that you still have the 7.5 rear and stock gears, and being a 93 they probably have 200,000+ miles on them, this is a common problem with the 7.5 rear end with 3:73s
orbitofdoom16 2 years ago
I thought the 3.0 and 4.0 rangers came with the 8.8?
Righty736 2 years ago
the 4.0 did, and after 95ish it was standard, but the old 7.5 was used on most 2.3, 2.9, and 3.0 trucks from the late 80s-early 90s
orbitofdoom16 2 years ago
The 3.0 isn't that powerful of an engine (my car has it and i like it) but I would be afraid of anything bigger than stock tires. Especially with a manual transmission.
Righty736 2 years ago
its not to bad, the motor can handle the tires, its the 7.5 is made for economy and on road stuff. We swapped in a dana 44 front and an 9inch in our old 3.0 and we dont have any problems with power
orbitofdoom16 2 years ago
Guessing a dana44 out of a jeep would be a fairly straightforward swap - right? Same bolt pattern and similar front suspensions.
Righty736 2 years ago
its almost a direct swap!, the suspension needed a few mods, but It worked out great
orbitofdoom16 2 years ago
OMG dude my 72 beetle would smoke that thing lol. My 1989 ranger 2.9 will move pretty quick though, at least for an old rust bucket.
PhilRanma 2 years ago 3
Lol, id so drive that...be fun in a slow kinda way
rebel0706 2 years ago
Comment removed
chorald 2 years ago
where the hell were you? an airport? haha
nicksoccer999 3 years ago 2
I am a Dodge/Chrysler/Plymouth/Jeep/Eagle/Studebaker*/Nash*/Hupmobile* master certified heavy-line journeyman auto mechanic and this video is NOT a fake. In fact that one runs pretty good.
My brother is a Ford tech across the street from my shop and I was having lunch with him in a new one of these he was test driving. The owner thought something was wrong because it was so slow. Nothing was wrong, they are just dangerously slow. Hands-down it was the slowest car I have ever seen.
*(Hehehe).
duanedragon2 3 years ago
dude slow down you might break it
DK99824 3 years ago
haha, I think you might be due for a new pickup. The new Rangers are pretty nice =).
stanbernadino 3 years ago 3
At least you'll never get a ticket.
EdwardPack1988 3 years ago 5
this is the slowest vehicle i have ever seen in my life.
65Dart 3 years ago 3
wow. haha, I think you need an engine rebuild.
rudolphna54 3 years ago
And besides, its only a 60HP diesel.
rudolphna54 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
W H A T A P E I C E O F S H I T!!!!!!!
whothehellisBOOBOO 3 years ago
must be easy to drive,all you have to do is hold it to the floor where ever you go :)
Asimo380 3 years ago 4
Well it was built to go 55, which was the speed limit then. So hey, I'd say thats not bad. :)
erik1980 3 years ago
I'd love to find one of these things. It looks like it'd be fun to drive in it's own way
Tuneman1984 3 years ago
LOL....it took roughly a minute to get o to 60
hahahahahaha
mifan93 3 years ago
ya wow thats pretty slow but i like rangers and i like diesels, so keep on rockin the diesel man!
jmanwild 3 years ago
This makes me want to puke. How much power are you running? 45 bhp or so?
Connor2K1 3 years ago
0-60in 1 minute? i wouldn't care its a diesel =]
hXcKinkBMX 3 years ago 2
Man that sounds way too much like a regular 4 cylinder. It reminds me of the 85 I use to have.
83RebelRanger 3 years ago
Meh, I doubt it's any slower than my Toyota Hilux diesel.
Dauntless244 3 years ago
Wow. My parents' 1991 VW Fox 1.8L is faster than that! 80mph on the highway, FLOORED! That's 60hp for ya! I love it though.
lancerevo1994 3 years ago
please tell me you werent flooring it
4x4Explorer 3 years ago
seems like the overdrive is a little high geared for what that thing puts out.
Hotrodx199 3 years ago 3
they were gonna be killed off in 2009 but all of us at the rangerstation made them continue to be made
farmboy184 3 years ago 2
My friend's 150cc scooter is faster than that lol.
Beldar4214 3 years ago
i think my school bus driver could top that hahaha
JoeOnKeys 3 years ago 3
Sounds like it could do with some shorter gearing.
Dauntless244 3 years ago
I figgured it'd be slow since it said 0-60 and the video was over 1 minute long lol.
1tristan1henderson 3 years ago
If diesels could talk, that one would be screaming HEEEEELLLLLLPPPPPPPPPP. hhaha. Great torque I bet
RiceReaper 3 years ago
haha i hope its got torque, cause if not it really wouldnt have anything
uscar17 3 years ago
Wow! So there is a Ranger out there slower than mine. Probably gets good mileage though...just don't pull out in front of anyone.
Was that at max rev or close to it in the gears. I presume it's only a 4-spd although 5th is useless if it has it anyways.
alienc3 3 years ago 2
jeez...thats horrible...although my dad had a 2000 Ranger 4cyl...not much better than that lol
05Forenza 3 years ago
2 minutes later... Nice sounding engine though. i wouldent mind having those.
Hotrodx199 3 years ago