Perpetuum Mobile - Virgo

[KHTRE100]

Знаете почему большинство моделей вечных двигателей исполнены в формате 3D? Верно! По тому, что в жизни не работает. А те, которые реально засняты на видео, всегда где-то имеют моторчик. Так-то...

[SuperBlubbAxelander]

i saw that on troll physics

[OK55OK55OK]

These comments are the best laugh I've gotten in a long time!! Some people are considering that the balls are floating up a "water tube"....how stupid. What do they think is keeping the water in the tube?????? Impossible... Just read the description dummies

[OK55OK55OK]

yeh, people are not reading your post, this is just something to watch to help relieve stress....You aren't saying it is a perpetual motion machine...... Makes those people look pretty stupid. I wonder how long they studied the video before deciding that it will not really work. Don't you wish you could just slap some people?

[Leszek1024]

stupid simulation

[heiden0815]

@yokon99 this isnt water .. its anti-gravity .. this part makes the PM work!

[Romeoazael]

he lee ido varios comentarios, varios tienen razón explicando el movimiento, pero lo que no explican es como el agua sigue en el tubo y no cae por el orificio donde entran las bolas

[samme135]

everyone who disliked this vieo didn't see the gears....

[dvdbox]

Troll Physics at its best :P

[mariianaiz]

geniaaallll ....pero cmo lo hagoo?

[vodafoneoff]

___ w w w diymagneticmotor com has interesting PLANS~

[tommzich]

omg guys, you all who are writing "do you know physics", "if we ignore physics, this work", tell me please, do you know what perpetuum mobile is? please, stop being so stupid.

[t0oShorT89]

think of a 2 miles high tube - you put in a 2000 pound ball of wood at the bottom - which amount of kinetic energy do you think is bigger - the one used to push that ball in at the bottom of the tube (sideways, through a semipermeable gate) or the one wich is produced by the ball floating 2 miles up AND falling 2 miles down?

same question different arrangement - anyone got a serious answer?

[Aviatorsmith]

@t0oShorT89 It would work at first but not for very long. It would eventually stop.

First, you have to consider the pressure of the 2 mile high water column on the gate pushing back against the ball. Assuming it can get past that, due to the friction and water resistance, the loop will start to slow down.

Since the machine operates on the principle that there is sufficient kinetic energy to overcome the friction, when it slows down that source of energy will deplete and the loop will stop.

[Bogman247]

@t0oShorT89 Right now for an actual serious answer. When the ball is pushed into the bottom, it must MOVE all the water above it. This is when it gets the buoyancy force from. Lifting 2 miles x area of ball of water will take a lot of energy.

[HeyImCheddar]

wouldn't you need electricity to run this?

[eduardoolev]

this is not a perpetual motion machine ... not to be perpetual energy can be used elsewhere, so the wheels would not turn

I used the google translator, english-portuguese

[Ramsez]

you should be ashamed of yourself

[backspacesquare]

the wheels are motors guys...

[endevol16]

lock really nice but it doesnt work =(

[32qazx]

i'm gonna put this in my car right NOW ! thank u jesus!

[quegzter]

Whats with the tube?

[ubtruk]

It is called a floaters wheel

[ve2zzz]

Look Mom... Not a single drop !!!

[tunebox2]

IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE REAL, all nay sayers let it go.

[kerflop]

im turned on is that wrong?

[monstre180]

Well the musics good lol :D

[row907]

um kay

[teufelsdroch]

Any energy you get out of buoyancy you use up pushing the ball into the water. As you add more balls the pressure in the water increases to maintain this. The problem is actually very simple: for any force the water exerts on the ball, the ball exerts an opposite force on the water.

In this case, you have to overcome whatever device it is that keeps water in the column. In most devices of this sort the water just overflows on the bottom.

[Zorrobeat]

@teufelsdroch But you can use nano particles of iron in a magnetic field instead of water to hold the "liquid" that it dont overflow...

[KirillKrasov]

So many dumb people who think that they are the smartest!

At first this is just a MODEL which ignore some physics laws and show how it would be like.

At second such things are called Mathematics perpetual motion.

At third this is just 3D ANIMATION.

Thumbs up if you're sick of all those geniuses who write in comments that this isn't working in reality.

[NUKE0IT]

not going to work. . .whats powering the gears. . ?

[Robix1997]

good

[Robix1997]

this is the best model of perpetual motion ....

[Sanraita]

So. Cool.

[mswinman]

It would appear that a great many people are missing the point here!!

[175myles]

@mswinman, That gullible people will believe anything if its on T.V!

[PurpleHaze2k9]

@mswinman I think so too.

[xXmasterbasserXx]

It's called a "concept", dumbasses.

[jaymcd84]

the weight of the balls pushing down on the maotor as it turns it would slow this system down.

[Singul4rity]

Even if the Liquid would stay in the Tube, the Energy needed to push the Balls into the Liquid and to displace the Biquid would be exactly as big as the Amount of Energy "produced" by the upward Force of the Ball.

[larryllix]

Wow! Real telekenesis demonstration!

[antichrist65535]

What if it was a metallic metal that was suspended within a magnetic field?

[BigWetChode]

this could work if the openings had a bubbly solution on them allowing the ball to enter and exit with the water staying inside

[jerryjw]

(continued)

If the tube is hollow, then this would not work either as there is friction in the "gears" axles and the energy required to go "up" (against gravity) would be greater than the energy coming down.

[jerryjw]

Yes, if the ends were open, and it was a liquid, it would definitely empty out. I believe it is a transparent dual walled container like a thermos bottle and a liquid is between the walls. The balls travel up through a hollow center. If this is the case, I have no idea why it is used. If they did somehow pass through a liquid, the liquid would have resistance and thus kill the concept of being perpetual.

(more)

[joefos7]

@jerryjw unless the balls were light enough and floght to the top



[Thedeoradude]

as long as we ignore physics, this should work great!

[vincenthu9644]

i dont think there is any proof that electrodynamic phenomena can contradict the law of conservation of energy. and also, 6 million, like anybody is going to pay an insane man 6 mil

[cellfoneguy2]

these are so fail...........

[henrykay01]

I invented a breakthrough source of energy that contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that contradict the law of conservation of energy. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.

H. Tomasz Grzybowski

tel. +48-512-933-540

[extremisto47]

@henrykay01

6 millions???

Are insaint???

[henrykay01]

@extremisto47 : I am not a saint. I am an inventor and a scientist.

[extremisto47]

@henrykay01

Insaint is antonim to saint. It means crazy man)))

Is it right? six (6) MILLIONS???? 6 000 000 $????

[henrykay01]

@extremisto47

Insane means crazy. Insaint doesn't mean anything, so I made a joke out of it.

[leandrorache]

It doesnt work, the pressure on ball when it go down (FxA) is more that the force of ball for up. conclusion, it doesnt work, the balls go down in water and the water fall

[nltubeyou]

I dont quite understand this, can u say in really simple english?

Sorry im just a 15 year old dutch boy, but obsessed by perpetual motion, and i dont see why this woulnd work.

[leandrorache]

@nltubeyou I believe in Free Energy, but not all examples are truth, this case is a good example, is very simple to undertand, in this example exist 3 forces, 1 go up, (Flotation) and two go down (weight of water and friction) , The conclusion when a ball go up the force of gravity of water to down force the ball to down, and the water spills.

[32qazx]

@nltubeyou _als je domme dingen zegt op internet doe dat dan als BELG en niet als Nederlander !

[likemachines]

wow that guitar sounds a lot like Thom Yorke.

[belka157belka]

под эту хрень моторчик взади встроен

[Mr123me321]

I had this idea 34 yrs ago & worked out that the pressure of the water on the ball entering at the bottom of the chamber was greater then the combined flotation of the 3 balls in the chamber. Or in other words the combined bouncy of the balls is not enough to overcome the downward pressure on the ball entering the chamber at the bottom and introduce anymore ball into the water. Therefore in real life the pressure would force the ball out the bottom each following in turn draining the Chamber.

[ccolimon]

what's the purpose of the tube ?

[Karlfalcon]

It is filled with water. The balls become buoyant when they enter the water and rise toward the surface, thus driving the chain.

The problem with this particular scenario is what is keeping the water from falling out the bottom of the tube and yet allows the balls to pass unobstructed.

[t0b53n]

"Meditation start..."?????

shut up !!!!!!

[Highmark2012]

dave read my other posts cowgoesmoo is an idiot and i just wanted to say of course i belive in god me and you are on the wave length dmt and other hullicinogens show this

[nltubeyou]

this looks possible, and funny:P

[YotamG1]

cum dispenser

[nnossov]

i don't understand how this bubble gum dispenser represents a virgin.. anyone?

[cowgoesmoo2]

@nnossov

AHAHA

[cowgoesmoo2]

I thought we learned that perpetual motion was impossible in 6th grade. What? are some people retarded?

[Surfister]

Michio Kaku - Physics of the impossible.

It is impossible nowadays, but noone knows if it will be possible..

[cowgoesmoo2]

If possible, it would mean zero increase of entropy; would render all theories incorrect/invalid.

[Highmark2012]

@cowgoesmoo2 No its not imposible you jack ass why would energy company controlled schools teach you to be self reliant and funny allot of the perpetual motion machines that dont work on earth work in space looks like you need some more schoolin o nevermind you take a poorly paid gov employees lessons to heart and never learned to think for yourself

[cowgoesmoo2]

Alright, understand that in space there is still friction. Friction renders perpetual motion impossible anywhere for the definition of perpetual motion means a machine that creates the equal or more amount of energy that is input. in space let's say you were able to create the absence of friction let's say, but there is still gravity. Very very weak gravity, but understand that gravity's frontiers go on forever, but weak @ that point, you cannot produce Perpet. Motion because of gravity

[cowgoesmoo2]

Gravity, comes from any kind of energy or mass and since a perpetual motion machine requires energy and is made up of mass somehow let's say in the absence of friction, and impossibly, the machine was made with no mass, the energy it conserves and possibly creates, produces gravity which renders perpetual motion impossible again.

[Highmark2012]

question for you do you think teslas wireless energy machine worked and why is so little tought about him in main stream education it is off subject but makes me want to question what i haxe learned and what they insist is junk science

[cowgoesmoo2]

His wireless energy machine DIDN'T work.

[Highmark2012]

Funny in the vaccum of space there is no air there for no friction we have never left our galaxy so we actually dont know if gravity gets weaker the further we move from mass but theoreticoly it could reach zero i cant belive you said there is friction in space lol

[cowgoesmoo2]

Funny in the vaccum of space it is not a pure vaccum for there is low, but still there is resistance.

[ruruns]

wow dood...just wow.....i am gonna try not to troll all hard core on you...there is an atmosphere within space, it is not a pure vacuum. there is friction, though minute in amount as it is. as well as random debris ranging from microscopic to anything as large as a planet or sun. please do watch more documentaries. so sorry bro..owned...but in the unlikely even that i am wrong...yeah..fuck you and everything..you know the usual come backs one uses when they are wrong..

[Karlfalcon]

Space is not a perfect vacuum.

And yes, gravity has been empirically measured, though whether there is a "zero point" or not is debatable. It will, however, approach a point where it might as well be zero.

Calculus. Learn it. Love it.

[Potemtole]

wait, space is not a perfect vacuum? how so? I thought that was the deffinition of space.?

[Karlfalcon]

Outer Space is simply defined as everything beyond the immediate atmosphere of a planet. It is not a complete vacuum, but is rather an extremely low-density of particles - mostly hydrogen and other elementary particles.

The boundary between space and the atmosphere is actually rather ambiguous. The prevailing definition is the point at which the solar wind begins flow freely - around an altitude of 75 miles or so.

[Karlfalcon]

Then there is also the point beyond the solar system at which the solar wind gives way to inter-stellar winds. There are many different regions of space. It is limiting to think of it all as one giant patch of nothing. It is so much more than that.

[Karlfalcon]

Space is itself a giant ocean, and the planets and stars motes adrift in its depths.

[cowgoesmoo2]

By the way, refering to non-government paid workers or government paid workers in the manner you have displayed shows you are homeschooled, am I right? Christan you are? Roman catholic? Islam? Think for yourself, too. Understand that the folks who teach you are not always right, (I have always done research and questioned information) and do research before making a decision, my good sir. I was also hoping you would have less run-on's.

[Highmark2012]

you speak like you know everything about gravity except it is still one of the greatest mysteries o and no i was not home schooled and my religion is not orthadox it is based on my expermentation with dmt, psilocybin and lsd of course you probably think that melts my brain and acounts for the run on sentences except even you use dmt every night when you sleep and the universes very existence is perpetual motion

[Karlfalcon]

Wow, okay dude.

Take another hit and chill.

[mortsdans]

ok so perpetual energy doesn't exist. and the reason water isn't used for energy is because right not the only water generator i know of (besides hydroelectric) is a fuel cell. it takes more energy to separate hydrogen and oxygen than you can get by combining them, so it is more a way to store energy than to create it. and if we make that energy with oil that kinda defeats the purpose...

[mordsith05]

In my university we can give water (H2O) a magnetized field using wavelengths of high energy light to hold the hydrogen bonds in a torodial magnetic bond. the hydrogen is then most easily seperated without the strong bonds. IT MEANS WATER WILL BE A POWER SOURCE!

[sabertooth1980]

Water is already a power source...

[TheDrakenZ]

They already use "H2O2" which is highly volatile as a source of power. They've also seperated Hydrogen from water and creates obviously enough oxygen and hydrogen and ran engines off of it to produce energy. The problem is money and time, and nobody wants to put the effort in because what you're getting out of it is saving the enviroment but not as much money gain as oil. All about money.

[AxelWendt]

Ofcourse it can!! Theres been a lot of people who developed water engines etc! Water is also the one of the main power sources for your body

[strictpolicy]

i dont understand how your zodiacs corelate to your piece

[iswindowsavirus]

as most of you and at one time me belive the idea of overunity / perpetual motion is not possible as least not in this day and age maybe later in time if you dont think it will work thats fine by all of us as we find its a trial to find the ways the ways for inprovement lets just say the balls where shaped more like this i=> (clyinder shape with a spear end would that work??make a better seal and as soon as its penatrated the water its in use for the up!

[Pedstil]

Whats the avalanche concept?

[cyborgtroy]

Some free energy bs that doesn't work, probably.

[capitanseven]

I am sorry - these are all stupid.

You would LOVE the avalanche concept - It does work.

[HarryPuntCunnington]

What is that song? Sounds like an early John Frusciante.

[cyborgtroy]

If you use a capillary tube, you're still going to have a lot of trouble getting the balls in without losing any water.

But even if you had a large tube that magically didn't lose any water, you would still need more force to push the ball in than you could get from gravity. It's called water pressure, and it produces buoyancy in the same way.

buoyancy is just like magnetic and gravitational fields. It can store energy, and it can produce force, but it never produces energy.

[hanzymester]

If the balls diameter is 20 cm, then one ball has ~4 kg pulling force. There is 3 balls in the water at one time. This is 12 kg pulling force. Is it not enough to pull the ball at the bottom ?

[jasperheuer]

Het water gaat op want de ballen nemen toch ook water druppels mee of niet?, of het gaat er aan de ander kant uit..

KAN NIET KAN NIET XD

[VvidEye]

what about a sort of one way valve...like in the heart.

[TheAlchemist1023]

impossible the balls would hav to change mas inorder to keep moving

[jklmuk]

no they wouldn't

the buoyancy force from the balls displacing the fluid on the left should push the balls on the left upwards

[TheAlchemist1023]

how are you going t suspend a liquid straight up with 2 open ends??? it is impossible

[jklmuk]

I have seen water support its own weight in an extremely thin tube.

Really to get this idea to work you would need a dense fluid. a tube with a diameter of a couple of cms and a fluid that could supports its own weight via surface tension over a gap of the diameter of the tube.

You are probably right that is in impossible!

[TheAlchemist1023]

but the liquid would probably be too dense for the balls to enter from the bottom

[jklmuk]

the force should be of the same magnitude but opposite direction at the top surface.

[chocolatechorus]

if there was a one way valve on both ends then it would work, as long as the ball's buoyancy in the liquid is greater than the weight of the balls on the other side

[jklmuk]

you wouldn't need a valve at the top gravity would keep the fluid it. you would need one at the bottom that uses a little energy as possible or does no work holding the fluid in.(don't think one exists)

the buoyancy force is acting upwards and the weight of the other ball is acting downwards. so they are acting in the same direction

[xxpjhxx]

you guys are not serious are you??? As soon as the surface tension is broken the fluid will run everywhere!!! If you could some how find a magic fluid the didn't collapse, the resistance would be so great that it is impossiple for the balls to pass through.

[MrCactusplants]

@TheAlchemist1023

you could use micro gravity, but then the balls wouldent move due to weightlessness

[Ebbelwoy]

@TheAlchemist1023 there could be some kin

d of gate which opens and closes, when a ball wants to pass, and closes after the ball entered the tube, not to waste any water

[TheAlchemist1023]

@Ebbelwoy and how are you going to keep the liquid in when the gate opens?

[Ebbelwoy]

@TheAlchemist1023 the gkate opens and closes slowly, and always fits to the ball. hard to axplain, and even harder to realize I admit ^^

[adanieltorres]

@TheAlchemist1023 You may be interested in youtube.com/watch?v=MIdt63Vl4X­s

[janius777]

@TheAlchemist1023

Water for instance is diamagnetic - with strongest magnets you can push it away - effect with water is extreme(!) weak - maybe with other fluids you can create a "sort of levitation" :)

But the idea of the vid is clear I guess: using the upward tendency of solid objects in fluids aka archimedic principle - "loses" weight proportional to space of water/ fluid object take in (floatation)

[jaymcd84]

@TheAlchemist1023

you can make a tube with an elastic rubber that kinda poops the balls out haha. like a skinny balloon, fill it with water, not full of water... lay it down and the water stays inside, squeeze the balloon and the water flows out. you can make an inlet and an outlet, but there are many more reason why this system would not work. the friction of the bearing when the rotor is turning is enough to slow down the system, unless it cooled and lubricated.. but that would be more work

[visskiss]

@TheAlchemist1023 it isn't liquid, it's a magnetic tube!

[Midnighter169]

@TheAlchemist1023 use a semi permiable membrane?.....hmmm

[TheAlchemist1023]

@Midnighter169 can you tell me of any semi permeable membranes that can hold water and allow objects to pass threw them?

[Midnighter169]

@TheAlchemist1023 lol trust me im not trying to disprove the law of equal sacrifice i admit i was being stupid and naive (also i take it from your username that i've probably offended you sorry :(......)

[TheAlchemist1023]

@Midnighter169 dont worry i dont care, i was just expressing my point

[rayvert64]

@TheAlchemist1023 unless it's magical liquid made by a unicorn!!! :O

[mrek94]

whats that program ?

[jpsousa4]

Pretty color, fun animation, worthless concept.

(and also, astrology can kiss my ass.)

[MichaelRMcCoy]

Pretty colors, fun animation, worthless concept.

[wapperott]

intresting

[cyborgtroy]

Sadly, the water at the bottom is at pressure, so even if you could somehow get the balls in there without losing all the water [A monumental feat in itself] you would still need to force each ball in there... thus providing energy to the system.

[12edDemon]

Mercury? It would not stick tot he balls and has a great surface tension.

[jiminymacca]

Yet the force needed to get the balls past the surface without it spilling would be unequal to the force exerted by the incredibly light balls on the other side

[sam6kamel]

no not work How to keep put balls from down without spilling water?

[wongowonga]

thought provoking.. i like these vids

[ElihuNivens]

the balls probably take a drop full of water with it each time it exits the water container.

[hewaboy]

what if the ball's had air in them?? that would press them up all the time but dont ask me how to keep the water inn

[EvgeniyKarp]

Шарики без потерь энергии не смогут войти через дно сосуда, даже если не учитывать, как технически осуществить это

[Converseche]

yes exactly my opinion :D:D:D:D

[hewaboy]

hehe yeah

[ubtalking2jz]

i agree

[00frostnova00]

How to keep put balls from down without spilling water? ;)

[pdr88]

It takes as much energy to force the ball into the water from below as you get out of it when it floats up (even if the seal didn't resist it at all). The pressure of the water column would be pushing down on the top of the ball as it was being submerged. If you do the math, the energies end up canceling.

[jklmuk]

i get the bit about the seal.

but unsure on the pressure thing.

if the pressure is forcing the ball down as it enters at the bottom would it not also be pushing the ball at the top up as pressure acts in all directions. As the balls are connected the forces would almost cancel each other out.(give or take for change in height)

I recon you could get around the valve thing if the fluid had a high surface tension and low density.

[hewaboy]

u know what i got a idea that might accualy work if the balls where thing and had air in them the wather would push it up and it might work and im not even kiding

[bigfixy]

please die

[pulveraria11]

Why don't you first?? Please -do us a favor - do it.

[nero486]

falls das blaue wasser ist würde ja rauslaufen es sei denn man teleportiert die kugel auf einen dichten Grund eines Gefäßes

[ChefVonAllem]

why is this impossible ?

[mislikci]

due to energy loss by friction, it isn't possible to work FOREVER without supplying any additional energy! Probably it will work, but after a while it would stop. (it must stop!)

[ChefVonAllem]

you cant say "it dont works" because the world say that its impossible -.-

why is this impossible ? ...expacially this one ...i can explain all the other perpetuum mobile trys ..but not this one

[TheConundrumer]

The world doesn't say "it dont works", the second law of thermodynamics says so (keyword: LAW). Denying the law is like trying to divide by zero.

[gkayur12]

read archimedis teorie...that video is a noob thats not happens. this is children theorie.

[RFTAEC100]

now thats something im sure it has 100% chance to work

[Wardos88]

no... its not possible...

i made it myself... de lightweight balls wont be pulled back in the water culum beceause of the pressure in de bottom of the cil. the force wich is needed to pull de balls in the cilinder is equal to the force wich is generated by the upward force of the water.. (dont know how you call it in english exactly)

im sorry.... my experiance is that a mechanical perpeteum mobile is not possible.

[RFTAEC100]

what if the cilinder is filled with a really heavy liquid and the balls with a light gas such as helium or whatever? 0_o still i think its a pretty interesting experiment even if it dosent work ^_^

[bgtwnm13]

but then what keeps the water from leaving the bottom of the tub :/

[Proottalfain]

or from the top (the balls are pushing the water toward the top).