Hi, Originally it was not designed to exceed mach and that is the reason tip-to-tip was not done on the fins. See comments from a few years ago. The motor did better then expected so this was the result.. Have fun !
Sure would. Max performance C rockets that I've seen (min dia, ~11" long,5-1 ogive cone, ellipse 1" fins, tumble recovery) top out around 1800 ft and max out just around half that speed.
You're right aaupton, even a min diameter D motor rocket in a vacuum has a max velocity of around 900 ft/s. So a C motor in air would surely be a lot lower. I was estimating max V based on altitude, but the math doesn't work out !
Could the wing flutter been helped if the fins were canted so as to have a corkscrew flight? It would make lousy video, but would it hold together better?
This is a perfect vid that shows fin flutter ! Fins of that design suck for that reason. Fins have to be long and as narrow as possible in order not to flutter. At super sonic speeds only the strong survive !!
what kind of materials were the fins made out of? and how were the fins attached? I've been building rockets for sometime, but nothing on a large scale. are you using carbon fiber or fiberglass fins? I had some aluminum fins my dad made me when I was a kid, but that didn't fly with the local NAR safety guy.
the fins were not designed properly for the speeds its all about areodynamics. i had a rocet that made it past 1.75 mach it took over 15 attempts trial and error then i got a adeodynamics book and made it to over 2.1 mach. its all about design.
Flutter...those are some crazy stresses on those fins, i think fiberglass is decent but not the best choice for material. Was the fiberglass layered only one direction or something?
Why but of course, but then you miss the purpose of thhe Booster Bruiser. It was made with none of those special techniques and flown progressivly on higher low average thurst motors until the point of no return was found. It was found on this flight
Should have made the fins more rigid and secure. Ive seen this happen before. Nice video.
journeyquest1 2 years ago
Hi, Originally it was not designed to exceed mach and that is the reason tip-to-tip was not done on the fins. See comments from a few years ago. The motor did better then expected so this was the result.. Have fun !
aaupton 1 year ago 4
Right after I saw what looked like sky writing, by the out-of-control rocket, it said "Enter your Text here". Funny stuff.
Geoffr524 2 years ago
that was nice fin flutter.
mugsytop 2 years ago
Yep, Core Samples SUCK!
shollys9 2 years ago
To Bad it didnt spell, ILL GET YOU MY PRETTY!
lol
viperf50 2 years ago
cool! so did u do this with a video-camera submitting LIVE video feed to the ground or is this camera different??
53rockets 2 years ago
@53rockets Hi,
This camera is one of our live feeds.
Art
aaupton 2 years ago
Max Q
n7275 2 years ago
Excellent
rebsunrise 2 years ago
enter your text here lol
ive never seen a model rocket do that just not back fire and nose dive a foot deep
miniatureme95 2 years ago 2
thats what happens when theres no gyro
Thefirstspectra 2 years ago
check out my rocket video (if you want) every thing went perfect and then disaster struck... it blew up :( haha
xentris77 2 years ago
Rocket on Coca :)
amybas 2 years ago
RRRRIP IT!!!!!
colinshark 2 years ago
Very cool....I'm sure nasa guys have seen and archieved the fins departing.
Icepacalapse 2 years ago
The aerodynamic term is 'flutter'. Nice example of transonic effect.
WHFilmsAndProduction 2 years ago 4
Yes correct Flutter,
But flutter does not work on youtube search as well as "rippin' fins" ;)
aaupton 2 years ago 7
Flutter works on youtube!
Helicopterpilot16 2 years ago
i am guessing quite valuable material was lost
derekroolz 2 years ago
Everthing was recovered fine.
Only the aeroskin airframe was damaged
aaupton 2 years ago
poor rocket:(
very nice ship tho
peeeete 2 years ago
it made a face 1:25
crapman94 2 years ago
my c engine rocket was clocked at 896mph so howcome this one only went 700
wynnebros 2 years ago
That is very interesting.
Do you have the data for that?
IF so you will be a world record holder for C engine speed.
aaupton 2 years ago
No he doesnt because it didnt happen. C motors would be hard pressed to break 400 mph.
r0ck3tsm0k3 2 years ago
Sure would. Max performance C rockets that I've seen (min dia, ~11" long,5-1 ogive cone, ellipse 1" fins, tumble recovery) top out around 1800 ft and max out just around half that speed.
bzzh8c 2 years ago
Humm... C motors won't do 900 feeet per second let along 900mph.
Check your data please Sir
aaupton 2 years ago
You're right aaupton, even a min diameter D motor rocket in a vacuum has a max velocity of around 900 ft/s. So a C motor in air would surely be a lot lower. I was estimating max V based on altitude, but the math doesn't work out !
bzzh8c 2 years ago
wow what kind of fuel
bktech333 2 years ago
Cesaroni Aerospace APCP in an N1100
aaupton 2 years ago
where is the dry lake area
bestamerica 2 years ago
wow even your failures look cool. I love the fin flexing. great aerospace info for kids....
ljsavmech 2 years ago
O.O BIG
dazzaspud4life 3 years ago
haha.
"and the coffee makers up there"
lol
crockerfilm 3 years ago
the fins may have broke but how did the rocket crash? the paracute should have still deployed?
heheomg1hehe1 3 years ago
Hi, The rocket's damage was dne up in the air. The chute deployed at the time of thefin shred due to how electronics work.
If fell harmessly but the damage was done up in the air, look close at a replay
aaupton 2 years ago
Could the wing flutter been helped if the fins were canted so as to have a corkscrew flight? It would make lousy video, but would it hold together better?
iDoDew 3 years ago
This is a perfect vid that shows fin flutter ! Fins of that design suck for that reason. Fins have to be long and as narrow as possible in order not to flutter. At super sonic speeds only the strong survive !!
normellow 3 years ago
Very nice video :D
tomcornwall83 3 years ago
Crackin video - great to see what actually happened to the fins. Shame the rocket bit the dust tho.......
mwakelin 3 years ago
looooooooooool
Runoldski 3 years ago
To us aerospace engineers that is called wing flutter.
aharrin1 3 years ago
What's it called to non-aerospace engineers? Do you use a different lexicon to everyone else?
ephraim0000 3 years ago
what kind of materials were the fins made out of? and how were the fins attached? I've been building rockets for sometime, but nothing on a large scale. are you using carbon fiber or fiberglass fins? I had some aluminum fins my dad made me when I was a kid, but that didn't fly with the local NAR safety guy.
munkeeboi83 3 years ago
oops! bit too fast for the fins! lol
wayne205stevens 3 years ago
damn that sucks wht place did u get?
hellkid94 3 years ago
Spectacular!
It's much more fun when they do something unpredictable like that! Much more interesting than a successful flight.
...and it makes it all the more fun that you had the camera and all the sensors to see exactly what happened during flight.
Bravo!
Monkeysaysoohoohah 3 years ago
Over-powered but sweet!
dreammaker182 3 years ago
where was it in jackson, i live here
yulooz 3 years ago
It was at LDRS 25 in Wayside Texas. The Jackson club all drove there.
aaupton 3 years ago
nice rocket forged alloy would be the go no break, what would it take to reach outer atmosphear?
steve250782 3 years ago
Jackson, Michigan represent! Excellent flight... well, except for the part where the fins ripped off and the rocket became a missile :P
Ibeechu 3 years ago
lol it left the camera
nolifeclan 3 years ago
it would have been sweet if it wrote something in the smoke
rounddot5827 3 years ago 2
ummm.. what the hell happend at the end??? lmao
XDEREKXJULIENX 3 years ago
The fins came off due to Mach effects and the rocket then became unstable.
Being Unstable, it safely flew about the recovery harness until the fuel ran out, then came safely to the ground.
aaupton 3 years ago
nice!
siegfrieddej 3 years ago
Hmm different fin design - perhaps tubular may not flutter so much?
Dranod 4 years ago
what was in the rocket???
PotatoViolenceCrew 4 years ago
your brain
Maxsapd 3 years ago
mmm
GoRideaMTN 4 years ago
Was it hard getting the camera?
RocketScience92 4 years ago
The Camera was still on the rocket, but the lens was broke off as it hit the ground.
The video was transmitted to the ground and recorded in real time.
aaupton 4 years ago
What res video can you transmit to the ground real time?
tomcornwall83 3 years ago
800mph!!!that supersonic!!!impressive.....very cool until the end part..
drsheikhjunior 4 years ago
Enjoyed watching the launch but not the disasterous end.
tjthev 4 years ago 9
Need an emergency destruct
kenmtb 4 years ago
That was sick. You can see the booster still firing away from the cam, course the cam is not ON the rocet anymore,
Zoomer30 4 years ago
Actually the Cam was still on the rocket.
The Cam was on the payload section watching the booster skywrite still attached together with the recovery harness.
aaupton 4 years ago
To borrow a line from Galaxy Quest to descirbe that fin flutter..."
"Noooo that anit right nooo"
Zoomer30 4 years ago
that was some crazy fin flutter; wonder what the fins were made out of
mannfizzle 4 years ago
.187" G10 fiberglass
aaupton 4 years ago
nice flite until you lost the fins
fastmax94 4 years ago
hmm. super sonic and the fins break?
Mazda6B6 4 years ago
the fins were not designed properly for the speeds its all about areodynamics. i had a rocet that made it past 1.75 mach it took over 15 attempts trial and error then i got a adeodynamics book and made it to over 2.1 mach. its all about design.
rippon10 4 years ago
You are correct.
The issue however was that the rocket was not expected to go past mach ;)
Art
aaupton 4 years ago
Carbon. Stiff, stiff, stiff. Hard to beat for rigidity, man.
MartySchrader 4 years ago
Flutter...those are some crazy stresses on those fins, i think fiberglass is decent but not the best choice for material. Was the fiberglass layered only one direction or something?
mlotek9 4 years ago
Hi Mlotek9. The fins were standard G10 sheet. To help prevent this you use tip to tip fiberglass lay up over the G10 fins and body/motor tube.
aaupton 4 years ago
aerobatic model rocket ;)
theXORone 5 years ago
got fiberglass?
minga86 5 years ago
the fins were G10 Fiberglass ;)
They should have been tip-to-tip layered to prevent this.
aaupton 5 years ago
Why but of course, but then you miss the purpose of thhe Booster Bruiser. It was made with none of those special techniques and flown progressivly on higher low average thurst motors until the point of no return was found. It was found on this flight
aaupton 5 years ago
Another wonderful flight by Air Boostervision! Great stuff!
VooDooRocketry 5 years ago
Good Fins are needed no matter what!
Adalore 5 years ago
gotta love rockets!
all4vid 5 years ago