Added: 4 years ago
From: RonPaulClips
Views: 8,572
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (161)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Theyre gonna hack the new electronic votes. McCains gonna make internet available only to people with federal ID cards.

  • wow

  • People, make the right choice in November!!! We might sat that future is in your hands!!! Do not vote for another Bush! Please

  • A vote for JUAN McCain is another vote for Geo. Bush's AMNESTY!! And a vote for Huckabee is a vote for Juan McCain!!

    How can a minority latino community DEFEAT 300MILLION AMERICANS??? Only by voting for JUAN MC CAIN'S AMNESY!!!

  • All people should enter America by the rules.

  • my I ask who you support of President?

  • Ron Paul FTW!

  • I agree with askwara. WATCH: FROM FREEDOM TO FACISM, by AARON RUSSO. Why is Ron Paul gathering momentum? It's that the American People have had enough, and we have a tool (the internet) in which to voice our will and share and expose discrepancies. And who's not tired of our nepotistic Presidential races. Since 1963 the weak, in this country have ruled the strong, and enough...is finally enough!

  • Everybody should watch the film AMERICA FREEDOM TO FASCISM! And nex day expect REVOLUTION! They will DEMAND Ron Paul! Spread the word !!!

  • LOL. Man, if people started watching that, they'd be demanding a super max prison for the 3,000 traitors of the 3,000 traitors of the cfr and most of the elites of washington. Revolution is quite mild for what it would be... 99.999999% of the public would flip their lids and break out guns.

  • yeah so they recognize it..but are they going to change it?? I sure hope so.

    LOL at Howard Dean's "Hee-ya!" I can never see that enough :)

    Go RonPaul!!

  • howard dean haha

  • yeah!! WE NEED MORE MAINSTREAM COVERAGE LIKE THIS..

  • News . aol . com

    Go to this poll and vote for Ron Paul!

    SCROLL DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE AND VOTE FOR RON PAUL!

  • Ron Paul a democrat? hahahaha democrats are the party of war. neocons too

  • @ batesm (in case youtube's quoting system doesn't work)

    he isn't isolationist fool, he's anti interventionist, there's a difference.

    he's not a democrat, that would mean hes pro war. hes a true conservative, he follows the constitution. anything wrong with that?

    read a book, learn about history, your American government's history, and be enlightened friend.

  • Since when is an isolationist and a non-interventionist the same thing? A non-interventionist trades with countries but avoids entanglements.

    How is that isolationist?

  • Can't win an argument with someone that thinks they knows it all. I think the people above explained it quite well already to you. Open your mind more often and close your mouth much more often so you can learn and listen. Go to dictionary(dot)com and type in isolationism. Different meaning than noninterventionism. You still thinks it's the same. Tell the dictionary website they are all wrong and you are right.

  • I'm not arguing the definition, only the semantics. I just gave an example of why it fits the definition, didn't you read it?

  • I think you should stick to playing your guitar. Have you been reading Alan Greenspan's novel..err book? I hope you don't believe everything he writes about the necessity of the FED...which is a pile of poo. Are you a Rudy supporter?? You sure sound like one!

  • no one gives a fuck what u think shut up!

  • just stop, they beat you

    Ron Paul 2008

  • Umm, Bretton Woods collapsed in 1971 -- where have you been? The whole agreement was based on currencies being backed by gold.

    As far as your "isolationist" kick, it's not semantics, it's vocabulary.

  • Lisa, it must be terrible to only rely on the first two paragraphs in an article to educate yourself. Bretton Woods was indeed dismantled in 71, however economists seek to revive it with something similar. In fact it is referred to as Bretton Woods II. It would stabilize the dollar. RPs opposition makes him an ECONOMIC isolationist as well as a non-interventionist. The very definition you defend and argue.

  • The difference between noninterventionism and isolationism is the difference between being a police officer and being a friend.

  • You claim, that you know history, with same success I can claim, that I know quantum dynamics. It is fine to trade with people, it is not fine to impose your culture and believes on them. And that is exactly what Paul says. Stop globalization before it is too late!

  • Azprint, you don't have a vote, Canadian.

  • your a fool... HES A REAL CONSERVATIVE... WHAT THEY USED TO BE

  • well I woulden't quite call him a libertarian any more... but maybe conservatives should be just a thought... I mean kill the hyper lexis, decrease central government, stave of ridiculious taxes and spending, and most important of all change our foreign policy.

  • Our foreign policy IMO isn't aggressive enough. Too many liberals and doves controlling our destiny. If we had been more aggressive after the Gulf War, we wouldn't be looking at blow back now. I'm sure our hesitation with Iran will result in catastrophe as well.

  • maybe we shouldent have intervened in Iran in the 50's... imperialism wasn't envisioned by the founders of this country and as strongly as I feel about our national defense imperialism is an unamerican value and empires are destined to fail. A good defense is a good offense, not always true. America can't be a bull in a china shop.

  • Your post really didn't make a lot of sense. First, you make assumptions about the US being imperialistic but don't support it with fact. We played no imperialistic role in Iran, ever. That's the only nation you mentioned. Why do you think our intervention in the 50's was wrong and how does it relate to any current event?

  • Isolationism is not accepting any imports from any countries. Non-interventionism is commerce with all, treaties with none...also known as, the original foreign policy of the US. Iraq and Iran: Our involvement in the 50's was because the public had gotten a president who was going to open the oil fields to private owners, which would directly effect oil prices here in the states-and we could no longer delegate the prices.

  • When that government was overthrown, the one we replaced it with was militaristic, but gave us exclusive sales on the oil, so we didn't interrupt it for years. Later, when the public revolted, we encouraged a specific group that promised to keep the oil with us, and so the 2nd coup in 30 years in Iraq began. This is where Saddam came to power.

  • Our foreign policy is currently encouraging pre-emptive attacks. So I'd like to come punch you in the face because I think in the future, you're going to post a comment here attempting to redirect what I've said in a negative way. Thats a pre-emptive attack. Except in Military terms it would be more like blow up your city and arrest whats left over.

  • Oh, and one more thing. He's been a republican senator for 20 years total. This means he's a republican, even though his views are similar to libertarians, his ultimate goal is limited government(conservative) and The Constitution(Republican). Blowback can't be prevented with more force, but it CAN be prevented with diplomacy and common sense. ask yourself: "if they did this to me, would I be mad?"

  • So batesm, you encourage facts vs. assumptions. I gave you some facts on government involvement in Iraq/Iran, and the difference between Isolationism and NonInterventionism. So my question to you is, please provide facts on how a pre-emptive war strategy reduces dependency on foreign oil, encourages peace, and discourages terrorism?

  • Fight the powers that be...

    TEAPARTY 07 Dec 16th...

    TEAPARTY07dotcom

    /watch?v=p_3LY1UmYhA

  • When is the next money bomb?

  • google: teaparty07

    Dec. 16th is the day.

  • thanks deli138!!!

  • To say people support Ron Paul 'because they are disenchanted with the candidates now in the lead' belittles Ron Paul supporters. How about people support Ron Paul 'because of his honesty, integrity and political views'.

    Ron Paul 2008!!!

  • That was actually a fair report.

  • It still hasn't changed much. Shame! Shame!

  • greatest man since mlk

  • someone might have to do some extreme advertising such as giant signs on bigname buildings, stopping traffic downtown NY.for example.

    Hey a little sacrifice for a big cause.

  • I think too many people have missed the subliminal [negative] message in these main stream media clips. This is not as positive as it appears at first glance.

  • Agreed, this has a bitchyness to it. Some say there's not such thing as bad publicity, but that's not true, just look at that clip of Howard Dean.

  • Yes. They liken Paul to Dean then show Dean acting like a nutcase.

    "Lets his online supporters figure out how to raise money" as if he's incompetent at money-raising.

    She calls it "Net" roots campaign to belie a "grass" roots campaign.

    "Sometimes wholesome, and sometimes decidedly not. She (the unwholesome girl) and hundreds of thousands of (equally unwholesome) others are hip to Paul because he's anti-war." and on an on...

    I'm sure you can see where she's going with this.

  • What CNN et al are basically saying is, "If we have to do the Ron Paul thing to appease his supporters and stem the flow of emails, let's at least toss in subtle insults to paint them as idiots."

    These clips are often presented in a patronizing contumelious manner - subtle enough to escape alarm, yet obvious enough to leave a negative subliminal impression in the minds of the undecided. I think it insults the intelligence of the average viewer since it assumes they are obtuse.

  • he is the greatest. very honest man

  • I would rather drop dead then give Gouleini or Hilary one cent.

  • Amen brother.

  • $182,500 per hour is about $50.70 per second, you incompetent fools.

  • lol...Good call! At least the MSM morons favored on our side with their ignorance of basic math skills...lol

  • WOW! There I am at :49 and :50 with sunglasses on during the NYC rally last month. That was a great day.

  • ...someone's got an ego. You don't need to tell the world which sec. of the video your in...bu thanks for being a Ron Paul supporter. Rock on!

  • SPACE3200. Ron Pauls Foreing Policy is embraced by many Jews and there is a group jews4ronpaul.

    Ron Paul is not anti-semite in any stretch of the immagination. This hurts DR. Pauls image and is untrue. Non-intervention would be much better for Israel. All we've done in stir up a hornets nest, armed everyone in the region and got them to give away land.

  • wow 235 5 star ratings!

  • the reason that Ron isn't showing up in the polls is that they aren't including his name among the choices.....

    and, because i asked when they called me, there's no write-in spot.

    so....there maybe a huge and i mean HUGE surprise in store for the mainstream media and our corporate overlords when the New Hampshire ballots are counted....cause Ron is the ONLY candidate on either side I see anyone supporting. the ONLY one.

  • MEDIA ADMITTING THEIR FUCK-UPS??? wow........

  • I want to know anyone who can be enchanted by any of these other candidates other than Dennis Kucinich. All these candidates want to be in Iraq for as long as it takes. Sounds like George to me. Most of these candidates want to attack Iran. Sounds like George to me. Non of them say anything that is going to affect my life in a good way. But Ron Paul has good ideas to better the lives of AMERICANS. Makes sense to me

  • did they really air that 2nd commercial?

  • Who didnt know that only money would make them listen

    money money money

    I read an article that said the youth of the nation are more likely to try and affect change by buying from specific companies... worried about environment? Only buy from green companies

    something we should all think about

  • Americans Boycott Israel....then we can fix our country.....bush gets pressure from Israel to bomb Iran and others,we need to stop holding Israels hand and let them fight their own battles

  • Is anyone else worried for the safety of Dr. Paul. With his ideas on policy (both foriegn and homeland), I think once the wrong people start to truly see him as a political threat, they may retalliate. His ideas could mean major money losses to the rich and corrupt. He speaks the truth which could mean bad news to the very powerful and evil people in our country. Do you agree that RP DEFINITELY needs a bigger security circle around him 24/7? ...or am I just being paranoid?

  • Actually I have been fearing that same thing.

    I'm sure if he becomes a real threat to the megalomaniacs who fund the other phony puppet canidates that he will be asassinated.

    Obviously they know that he cant be bought like all the other politicians.

  • If it happens it happens Ron Paul stands alone from the others and he has more grace than the pope....Fear nothing

  • I think he should spend some of that money on big body guards and expert scanners for extra eyes. Has anybody read this article of suspicious deaths of good politicians?

    alternet . org / story / 14399 /

  • The biggest thing that Ron Paul can do to make sure of safety is to keep exposing how things are working behind the scenes. These corrupt low lifes hate the limelight and run like cockroaches when you turn the light on them. The more truth the more light. Open government prevents hidden acts.

  • What we have already done has been tremendous. However it is getting cold. How are we going to campaign during the winter?

  • Get part time jobs.  Donate the full 2300(4600 if married). After that spend money on mainlings and billboards from that part time job.

  • Wow, they are admitting their lack of coverage. This is awesome. Now if only Faux news will do the same!

  • youtube . com/watch?v=UArPCrwW0ho

    More good news, Doug Stephan of Good Day USA is now in the Ron Paul camp! Thanks Doug!

  • It's about time.

  • "That's what his supporters call it...his money bomb."

    I'm not sure what she meant by this. At least RP is getting the coverage he deserves. :)

  • Thank you, Carol, thank you!

  • Amazing stats on that story. I think we are finally hearing about this guy and people like him. Hard to argue with the Constitution.

  • Thanks carol!!!

  • "Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power."

    Benito Mussolini, Fascist dictator of Italy

    "Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism'. I'm afraid, based on my own long experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."

    Sen. Huey Long

  • Fascism already came to America. We're trying (and failing) to shake it off now because it does not suit us economically, anymore.

  • This was awesome!

  • Jon McFain who?

    oh oh oh John McCain, yeah what a loser

  • These journalists are so idiotic, it's amazing.

    Go Ron Paul!

  • Surprisingly good media coverage for Ron, the man FOR THE PEOPLE.

  • this just proves how irrelevant MSM is now. thank you, youtube!

  • I hope she (and/or her producer) doesn't get in trouble for having done that. That sort of thing (evidence of a shut-out) is a very tightly held secret. The cat's out of the bag now; people will be monitoring the monitoring, and demanding equal time. Fair enough, too.

  • Regards the 'name mention stats' this is clearly not accurate, as the software simply does not exist to monitor all verbal data on all news channels. They've taken some sample data i.e random hours on random days, found a mean average and multiplied by 365. Probably some undergrad did it for them and thought he was very clever, but the result is without merit.

  • You are incorrect. Monitoring of media is a *big* industry. There's lot's of money to be made in this. Companies subscribe to monitor media for any mention of their company (good, or bad). These figures are as objective, and professional as you can get. Basically, they're true numbers; he really is being deliberately shut out.

    Most telling was that she never displayed Clinton and Giuliani figures.

  • Forgot to mention the actual company that did it: vidmon(dot)com

  • Where did they get the stats @ 1min 32 sec (4,695 mentions vs. 95,005). I'd love to see how "traditional media" was defined. Plus, the numbers seem hyper-acurate for such a huge amount of content that must have been processed...any knowledge on this out there Youtube?

  • You can find the company that produced the figures here: vidmon(dot)com

    Traditional media = Mainstream Media (MSM) = CNN/NBC/CBS/ABC etc. That level.

  • I'm a full Ron Paul supporter but I still think that statistic is a bit wrong. It wasn't $3042 per second. That should be per minute. CNN should take math 101!

  • That ad, Voiyour, is for the pre-internet generation to relate to so I think it's perfect. A little mix of the old school and new school.

  • Anyone who is disenchanted with the candidates no in the lead is a Ron Paul supporter? LOL! That's like 90% of the country.  So people! GET OFF YOUR COUCH! ITS OUR COUNTRY! TAKE IT BACK!

    --Ron Paul 2008.

  • Go CNN!!! Shove Ron Paul right up FOX's ass and help us save the world!!!

  • Yes, who are his supporters, Republicans, Democrats and Independents and disenchanted voters. Wow this man crosses all political boundaries because he is the only one running for the Presidency that speaks the truth. Unreal, finally a politician that has integrity. Unreal, finally a politician that really cares about the individual American. Unreal, finally a politician that cares about the truth.

  • I totally agree Hooverdog!

    Carol Costello's last line is an absolute classic "His supporters are Republicans, Democrats, Independents, old people, young people: Anybody who is disenchanted with mainstream politics".

    Basically, it's decent, honest people against the corrupt elite and their slaves and sycophants.

  • Is he really running that crappy ad in NH? The [first] one everybody hated on.??

  • LMFAO! CNN can't do basic math. "3,042 dollars per second..." - uhhh, you sure 'bout that Einstein? LMAO!

  • lol she meant per minute but that sounds a lot better

  • The corrupt establishment isn't liking it.

  • this is a first step. Good

    I still dislike that TV ad ...

    Ciao!

  • The TV ads have to appeal to a broad audience. Ron Paul's message needs to wake up the sleeping masses.

  • yes, but I hope they will not fall totally asleep after that ;)

    Ciao!

  • I have been praying that Ron Paul would finally be blessed with the positive media coverage he deserves. Thank you JESUS!!!

  • Is Lou Dobbs jocking for a VP bid here? He might just be the man to back Mr. Paul up.

  • Thank you CNN for this coverage! I'm going to make some Ron Paul Revolution signs and post them here in Las Vegas. You will be surprised that PEOPLE can change this election!

  • wow 4k to 95k that seems somewhat intentional. I don't even wanna think about how many times they've mentioned Rudy's evil ass.

  • Ha ha ha ha, yeah man, Rudy is evil!!! No doubt about that... For the good of the world, I hope Ron Paul becomes the next President of the US.

  • And how many of the 4k were negative? Designed to marginalize or ridicule? Since November 5th there have been some fierce attacks, but also some of the most positive mainstream messages thus far! Roll on 11/11 when the next bomb drops! And December 15th / 16th when 2 days will make history and give us the sweetest Christmas ever!

  • it worked!

  • Love It!

  • that was a first

  • First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they do flattering stories about you, then they drop the bomb on you, then you lose.

    Yeeaah!

  • RON PAUL 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • That right biiachh.. RON PAUL!!

  • Much like Howard Dean

    "YEEEHAAAAW!!"

    Only better.

    Epic

  • Indeed truly epic...almost shat myself from laughter...now that would of been legendary.

  • It's about time!

  • YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!­

  • I still laugh when I hear Dean's Yell.

  • I love it! Ron Paul 2008!

  • Yep they aren't very good at arithmetic on CNN.

  • 3042 * 60 * 60 * 24 != 4.38 million

  • I think she meant to say 'minute' and not 'second'...kind of makes a big difference.

  • Thank you Carol!

  • I guess they realized promoting him on CNN is good for their ratings.

  • The reports are just getting better and better! Gotta love it!

    GO RON GO

  • Well that's a fair coverage. Tx Mrs Costello.

  • Thank You Carol!

  • Go Ron Paul!

    - Please click on my name and view my

    Ron Paul video. It's my first one, and

    comments would be GREATLY

    appreciated. I think you will enjoy it :)

    watch?v=T3cze7NYLr4

  • RON PAUL FOR THE LONG HAUL!!!

  • the MSM is scared as hell of Ron Paul

    and they should B

    because he has qualities they can only dream of having

  • We need math people. If Run Paul got $3,042 per second that would be equal to $262,828,800 on 24 hours. If only he could get that much on the next money bomb.

  • Who counts such things as the number of time a certain name is said?! :)

  • I fear that Fox will bump him from the next Fox debate for their own agenda. ...what has happened to the country that I learned about in school. Where did it go. Was it ever here? Please, e-mail Fox News and Politely ask that they adhere there their "Fair and Balanced" Policy and cover Ron Paul as they should. Please remember to be polite.

  • GOOD girl.

    That's what you should be saying...

  • I think this is the best coverage I've seen of Ron Paul to date. OMG, I LOVE this woman.

    Carol Costello told it like it is.

  • I just watched Ron Paul on live TV in a committee meeting with Bernakie (sp?) the head of the Fed Bank. He was brilliant!! and for once other Senators were associating themselves with his remarks..what happened to the laugher?

  • He's catching on, I'm telling ya!

  • I thought the Ron Paul girl was fine, she wasn't letting her boobs hang out or anything, it was classy and fun!

  • RON PAUL R[ƎVO˩]UTION!

  • Ron Paul is going to win!

  • Ron Paul won 21/41 straw poll (51%)!! Beating all so call top tier candidates in the GOP! After each debate he won the main online polls the TV provide! He raises 7.6 million so far for his 4Q from From individual not big corporation! this is FASTS! He is going to win the GOP nomination!

  • This guy's great! Paul may be the only candidate out there with a plan to save the dollar.

  • It seems CNN isn't the greatest at math skills are they? LOL

  • What's not wholesome about Ron Paul girl!?

  • we're seeing a true grassroots movement here, and it's exciting! let's keep it going, we need people like Ron Paul involved in our process.  peace.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more