this fight will not go the distance, diaz is a savage dog and carlos is a warrior, i'm looking forward for this match . gsp will not be a champion for long
diaz will lose to condit and lose his title shot. then diaz will realize how much he f*cked up when he lost his title shot by blowing off a press conference.
@TrippySkippy1 lol interweb-hooligan huh? he would break every single bone in your body before you even realize whats happening...but...good luck with the kick dude
For every dumbass who thinks they edited Nick Diaz's "where u at George" to "where u at Carlos". George has 1 syllable and Carlos has 2. Jesus Christ did you guys even graduate elementary school
Please rate down UFC-Videos until they distance themselfes from cencoring the internet through SOPA. I love the Sport and UFC is a major player in spreading MMA. But i also love my freedom of speech, to communicate with my fellow humans. I will not stand for this, i won´t let moneyhungry gready companies take this away from me! And neither should you! Give this comment a thumps up and the video thumps down until UFC chainges their mind!
@damuschka SOPA is shelved u dumbass. u should be worrying about ACTA. its even worse than SOPA. its already been signed by most countries including ours and by the euro union. plus poland signed it yesterday. a couple more sigs. and it will be enforced big time. so please think before writing a FAIL comment
how did you get 10 thumbs up :D You can see with your own eyes from the video above that Diaz said "where you at Carlos". You thought it was photoshopped, or..
All you SOPA activists should more care about ACTA wich was actually voted on 26 of January 2012 without anybody knowing... And it s worse than SOPA believe me.
Dana White on SOPA: "Is SOPA the perfect bill? No, it's not," he said. "The only thing that we're focused on is piracy. Piracy is stealing. If you walk into a store and you steal a gold watch, it's the same as stealing a pay-per-view. I don't care what your twisted, demented idea of stealing is. This kids who grew up on the Internet never had to pay for anything, so they don't think that you should have to."
Bruce Lee quote : " belts are only good for holding up your pants ".
I have black belts in a few martial arts ( Judo, japanese Jiu-Jitsu, Aikido, Krav Maga ( self-defense ) and i teach Capoeira as a fight ) and i´m humble enough not to be a SHOW OFF with them like these guys and going around there saying what i just did...oh wait, damn it, i did it :)
Btw, i´m 32 and i practice martial arts since i was 3/4 years old.
SOPA is dead, but UFC did support them.. and that means they support ACTA (Which within 1 week will be passed, no doubt about it.).. as a Company.. they can't outright support ACTA, but behind the scenes we all know they're giving us the finger. (BTW.. ACTA is SOPA x 1000)
Condit, please dont follow the same game plan as Cerrones dumb ass! When Diaz says,"dont use that gay wrestling shit",, It's because hes knows it'll throw him off. Get the win and leave nothing up to those dumb fuxs, that the ufc calls their judges. And don't accept money from whoever is paying these other fighters off!! This is why we don't watch boxing anymore.. Condit for the win!
Enough of the SOPA stuff idiots do you think these guys are the only company that supports SOPA , PIPA, or any other thing you don't like that might get paste at some point. SOPA was delayed because it lost it once overwhelming support and the UFC or THQ maybe able to buy politicians but we can just speak up again and shut it down like last time. Most of you complaining about it probable did nothing to stop it like I did so either do something or shut up. Voting down on a game isn't helpful.
@keikuru1 Do you honestly believe that a dislike on a video will stop or change the UFC's mind on supporting SOPA!?!? " OH no! theyre disliking our YOUTUBE videos" Hahahahahah.. You might aswell go to wall street and bitch about the 1%..
@TheOreoswithmilk sopa was only shelved man its not gone these cunt politicians are gonna wait till more people believe its gonna to ninja it into law
@keikuru1 Then why take away from the fighters by demoting the fight with dislikes? I don't support sopa or pip, but I understand their business decision. I also don't advocate torrenting fights. They were wrong but why dislike the video? If you really felt strongly about the bills you would have contacted your representative. I'm not a sheep and I don't appreciate the bullshit. You're no better than the corps.
@Alpinex105 Demoting the youtube videos for a clear and obvious reason easily readable in the comments doesn't take anything away from the fighters, but from the company that only cares about profit and not about the people. There videos are publicity, they are hype, the fighters don't care about their reception because it's a bunch of edited content that doesn't represent them in the first place. You're boykotting your own freedom with your comments
@MathijsMoonen Of course they care about the profits. They care about their gains just as much as you care about yours. You do realize that they get bonuses based on PPV buys? Those bonuses are a huge chunk of their earnings. To some extent corporations care about their consumers. Dana Whites promotions certainly go a long way. I disagree with SOPA but I could certainly understand why they would support the bill. If you want me to expand on anything let me know.
@Alpinex105 No, corporations these days don't care about their consumers at all and let's face it, the world as a whole is going left, not right: if people are widely complaining about any of these antisocial bills or simply behaviors, it simply means that our society is moving back to socialism like it should. And by socialism I mean the real socialism Marx and Lenin have been preaching, not the regimes of egotistical monarchs like Stalin or Hu Jintao who don't understand equality.
@MathijsMoonen PART 1 Now keep in mind generalizations are not very useful in discussions about a particular issue. They have to to some extent. It's one of the most common rule of economics. If they don't support their consumers (this takes many forms) they don't have a consumer base. Which means no profits and no need for corp to exist. Exxon anyone? I don't really care about political prestige or the political concept of left vs right. I find them destructive to democratic institutions.
@Alpinex105 You don't care about the concept of left and right yet the ideas you illustrate are totally right wing wanting to give corporations all the freedom they want. Corporations should be controlled because people at their heads profit too much while the people at the bottom of the bottom of the pyramid within the corporation itself barely survive. It's not overgeneralising, it's having principles.
@MathijsMoonen " You don't care about the concept of left and right yet the ideas you illustrate are totally right wing wanting to give corporations all the freedom they want." I don't understand how you got that from my posts. Could you please quote me. Corporations are controlled to some extent through economic regulations/monetary systems ect. Oh Labour laws/safety/criminal laws. I'm not a republican or a democrat. I'm an independent and I don't like the labelling technique to discredit.
@Alpinex105 I can't "quote" what shows me that you're way to the right, because it's the ensemble of all your comments, but to sum it all up in a few words it'S the way you defend big corporations like the ufc and their policies, calling them caring is an offense to socialism.
@MathijsMoonen I in many posts have told you I don't believe in this Ideology. I don't label myself as right or left. No it has nothing to do with that. It had to do with your original response. I also was criticizing your comments regarding marx, but does that make me a right wing - republican? That's an odd approach. I've already stated that this labelling tries to destroy credibility. The right use it on the left and the left use it on the right. It's irrational.
@Alpinex105 Either you support equalty (left) or you don't (right), there is no labelling involved. (Or maybe you want to discuss that and the fact that blue is actually red and the universe is really only a product of your own imagination)
@MathijsMoonen There are variations as well. I think you are clear about this concept. Remember you pointed out Canadian left and American left are very different from your views. Also socialism and communism are not on the same level in the political spectrum.
@Alpinex105 Actually, communism equals socialism, arguably anarchy equals socialism even more but what is anarchy but the utopic representation of what communism should be.
@MathijsMoonen It's exactly what FOX news anchors do to discredit opposing views. "Left wing- Liberal ideology". Its similar to the masculinisation of militarisation and ideological cohesion. If you don't like the kill or support the military your a "sissy or pussy". You have labelled me a "right wing" because I oppose your views. "because liberals criticizing liberals" or "socialists and socialists" doesn't exist.
@Alpinex105 The most left wing of americans or canadians is still a right wing in my eyes and in the eyes of any socialist. Maybe to you this is a discussion between socialists but to me it is most certainly not any I can assure you, you'Re going to meet many a real european socialist in your life that is ten times less open minded than me.
@MathijsMoonen Left wing Canadian and left wing American are two different extremes. It doesn't matter who it's a discussion between. What matters is the argument. The substance is what matters.
@Alpinex105 What matters is the idealogy, the philosophy, what you think, why you think that. That's what matters. Stop being such an occultist, it's really not getting any debate anywhere.
@MathijsMoonen Well the issues of political philosophy you brought up. I just wanted to talk about the Unlike = not promoting fighters and that the UFC gives to the fans. You agreed with one of them. The rest is just irrelevant.
@Alpinex105 The money the UFC doesn't make from us shouldn't be taken away from the fighters, but from the owners who buy ferraris because they don'T know ehre to put their dollars.
@Alpinex105 My original comment was that we had every right to boykot an organisation because it doesn't stand for what we believe and that we should not have to care about the fighters because clearly, the company has the ressources to pay them regadless if only they would be more equal in how they distribute their income among their employees. Do you get my point and the whole philosophical debate it created when I put it like that?
@MathijsMoonen More fair? Why do we assume the fighters are not Partners? Some searching would help. FIghters have become partners with the UFC bonus pay structure.
@MathijsMoonen There would be two problems 1) What incentives would the fighters have to compete?
2) The philosophical debate is irrelevant. We're talking about the current framework and if the demoting of this video effects the fighters. WITHIN this framework. That is what I stressed.
@Alpinex105 The fact that we're not living in the world we would like to live in doesn't mean we shouldn't want to live in the world we want to live in. It's almost 5 AM here and I'm supposed to get up in 3 hours so I'm really going to let go of this now. Goodnight
@MathijsMoonen Well it depends on who you talk to. Generalization is not a good way of getting points across. Ok goodnight. Keep in mind you don't have to respond now. It's youtube respond when you have the time
@MathijsMoonen PART 2 but that's an entirely different conversation. Well if your a believer in the political shift keep in mind the political movements act like a pendulum that sway back and forth, but again that's a political discussion I don't want to get into because it diverts our attention away from the real issue. Marx and Lenin? They had many contradictory philosophical views (of state), but again lets stick with the UFC. Your touching on many different issues that had nothing to do wi
Marx and Lenin shared an idea, I'm not talking about their respective opinions on the execution of their plans to make the world a better and fair place, of course they were going to be different but eventually they could have found common soil. You need to stop lecturing me and realise that as long as you refuse to justify the principles behind your ideas by discussing them in depth (and of course that implies "drifting away from the topic") the things you say don't have any weight.
@MathijsMoonen Fair place? The bourgeoisie totally didn't exist during Communist Russia (which many theorist don't consider to be communists). I agree the world needs to be a better and safer place, but what about the issue of Dislikes and likes? I'm addressing your original concerns which has nothing to do with this political discussion.
Just a thought are there other economic-political-social ideologies that could lead to a better safer world other than "communism"?
@Alpinex105 Of course communist russia wasn't socialism, Lenin was a socialist but after Lenin everything went to shit. I don't understand why you would point out flaws in a system like it somehow proves the idea behind it is equally flawed then acknowledge that in fact the system was not respecting it's own idea.
@MathijsMoonen No I pointed out that Lenin and Marx had different ideologies or conceptualisations of what socialism should be. My intensions were to adress your point about marx and lenin. This has nothing to do with the main post you responded to by the way. There are no emotional attachments to my recent posts. There are no tones. This is text it's hard to point out what I really thinking... You have to go by the text..This is the problem with the spectrum. Right wing creates a particular ima
@Alpinex105 Pointing out details in my comparison of LEnin to Marx is certainly more off topic than anything I have said until now. You seem to assume, for no reason, that I don't know they aren't perfect clones of one another. In the end they are both socialist extremists who envision a world where everyone is equal in complete opposition with right wing parties who spread word about the "american dream" and power in the hands of the few.
@MathijsMoonen No I did't assume. I just pointed out that they believed in very different ideologies. Which is why many communists don't consider the USSR as communists. I pointed out that there were huge disparities between the ruling and everyone else. The hand of the few? Couldn't that apply to communist russia?
@Alpinex105 Communist russia wasn't socialism (am I not repeating myself enough? I'm one of those people you talk about) and ideally, there should be no disparities between leader and people in a real and functional communism or it wouldn't be socialism.
@MathijsMoonen "The phrase 'Socialist state', often called 'Communist states' in the West, is widely used by Leninists and Marxist-Leninists in reference to a state under the control of a Vanguard party that is organizing the economic, social and political affairs of said state toward the construction of socialism" wikipedia.. I should have been specific my apologies.
@Alpinex105 That's food for another discussion. I don't agree that a fighter like Jones earns more than a fighter like Pat Barry. I understand why people want more money, but I believe they shouldn't want more than they need. This counts for Dana but also for certain fighters, musicians, actors, and the list goes on forever. This world is a pretty fucked up place right now in terms of equality.
@MathijsMoonen Why not? He has the belt after all and draws in more PPV buys..More than they want? It doesn't really matter. Within the current framework they have a good arrangement. If you really feel strongly about shift the framework you should fight the cause through democratic instituions.
@Alpinex105 I'm sorry man but eventually you don't have a point. The world is shifting as we speak and the framework you're talking about is no longer what the people want. That's why I bring up PIPA, SOPA, ACTA, file sharing, piracy, equalty, socialism, ... to support my point of view when you're being conservative in your statement trying to somehow confine me to the rules of our current system when eventually this whole boykot is directed at the system. You will understand.
@MathijsMoonen *image.. Ignore those. I'm not right wing or left. My views are mine alone and not how a particular party. This you have to be clear about.
@MathijsMoonen PART 3 with my response and I would really like for you to stay on the original topic. I really don't want to get into political-theoretical studies.
@MathijsMoonen I've also mentioned how they have to some extent provide their clients with some sort of "care" if they didn't they wouldn't exist as a corporate entity. If "They don't give the people what they want" then no one will purchase UFC products.
@Alpinex105 Those are marketing stunts, the truth is they still support SOPA, PIPA and ACTA and might harm more people than only their fans in the process. Also, if some people in the UFC make too much money that means that from a socialistic point of view they are still now caring about their fans NEARLY enough if at all. (I'm being really openminded here and assuming it might not be 100% marketing)
@MathijsMoonen They are that is correct, but to say thats not some sort of "corp UFC positive give back to the people" is odd to me. OK so they do care but not enough... See the confusion came with they don't care at all. Ok so now we agree on that issue. Whether they do to a little or alot I don't care about. What I do care about is that you acknowledge that they do. Free tickets/ppvs ect.
@Alpinex105 Truth is I never thought they really cared, but just for the sake of argument I agreed to put that aside and assume it's not all a marketing stunt (I mean the givaways and such), which it probably is, to keep people like yourself convinced they actually care. It's much like celebreties giving away 1% of their purse to charity and pretending it's a big deal and people believing it's true because 1% is still a lot of money in their eyes.
@Alpinex105 The fact that Dana White owns several cars like his million dollar black ferrari shows just how much he cares about giving and taking just what he needs and how much he understand about sharing or equality.
@MathijsMoonen PART 3 Owns many cares therefore he doesn't care about giving and taking? The promoters generate the partial funds for the fighters. They could very well start up a cooperative. Leave that to the fighters. The fighters get bonuses if PPV sells a lot. So I think revenue is a relevant issue as it counters the argument presented which is Unliking the video = fighters don't care. If we consider that the video promotes buying of product.
Carlos was about to rather shit his own pants than to get in there and dogfight Nick.
the23eye 2 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
diaz is a biotch LOSER
HIVisaLIE 2 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
Comment removed
makaio81 2 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
This has been flagged as spam show
Condit won by running around.
We'll see who wins next:
lay n pray(gsp) or running around (condit). One thing is for sure, it'll be a boring fight.
Props to Nick Diaz for retiring. Forever a Fan!
TheMovieLinker 2 weeks ago
Carlos Condit is coming to finsih you...in 3rd person.
OnRockIT 2 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
This has been flagged as spam show
Super,,,
ommozy 3 weeks ago
FIGHTING + WEED + TRAINING = BY KO
CROOKSTER818 3 weeks ago 6
i cant wait to see condits fans face when he gets ktfo
CROOKSTER818 3 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
@CROOKSTER818 Totally writing off Condit is the biggest mistake you'll make. Diaz definitely has a good chance at winning, but so does Carlos.
scotto132 3 weeks ago
@scotto132 true bt diaz smokes weed he will win trust if u smoke weed u should know why hes gunna win
CROOKSTER818 3 weeks ago
@CROOKSTER818 you'll be waiting a while...
kenfo0 2 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
this fight will not go the distance, diaz is a savage dog and carlos is a warrior, i'm looking forward for this match . gsp will not be a champion for long
proyect070109 3 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
@proyect070109 no, diaz is not a dog, and condit is not a "warrior". It is a sport, nothing more.
kenfo0 2 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
WAR DIAZ
HASSPREDIGER20 3 weeks ago
the peanut head!!
polel 3 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
diaz will lose to condit and lose his title shot. then diaz will realize how much he f*cked up when he lost his title shot by blowing off a press conference.
signboyy 4 weeks ago
@signboyy although this fight wouldve happened anyway soooo...
sgharris456 4 weeks ago
@sgharris456
yeah but he was going to fight for the belt and he blew it. now he has to get through condit to fight for the belt which isnt going to happen.
signboyy 3 weeks ago
0:21 if that was my camera id have kicked him in the nuts!
TrippySkippy1 4 weeks ago
@TrippySkippy1 daaaw your precious camera
StargateMunky 3 weeks ago
@StargateMunky you know if that camera man had bitch slapped him youd have rofl
TrippySkippy1 3 weeks ago
@TrippySkippy1 lol interweb-hooligan huh? he would break every single bone in your body before you even realize whats happening...but...good luck with the kick dude
MoodyWanderer 3 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
@MoodyWanderer lol he cant even do that to his oponents hahaaaaa!
TrippySkippy1 3 weeks ago
UFC is FAKE!
TheOfficialiKON 4 weeks ago
@TheOfficialiKON i think ur moms tits r fake to but i aint complaining
Tacoflavoredkisses25 4 weeks ago
For every dumbass who thinks they edited Nick Diaz's "where u at George" to "where u at Carlos". George has 1 syllable and Carlos has 2. Jesus Christ did you guys even graduate elementary school
7718julian 4 weeks ago
@7718julian thank you!!!
Tacoflavoredkisses25 4 weeks ago
@7718julian shut up fool
laygmanoy 4 weeks ago
@laygmanoy lol you must be one of many that didnt graduate
7718julian 3 weeks ago
where u at carlos? diaz all day!
Comedygang 4 weeks ago
Cant share this video on Facebook. WTF this sucks
freddyboy420 4 weeks ago
@damuschka fuck u and fuck your comment
rub9999 4 weeks ago
for anyone wondering what the song is its "warrior's lullaby ref"
Jarheadftw 4 weeks ago
Please rate down UFC-Videos until they distance themselfes from cencoring the internet through SOPA. I love the Sport and UFC is a major player in spreading MMA. But i also love my freedom of speech, to communicate with my fellow humans. I will not stand for this, i won´t let moneyhungry gready companies take this away from me! And neither should you! Give this comment a thumps up and the video thumps down until UFC chainges their mind!
damuschka 4 weeks ago
@damuschka SOPA is shelved u dumbass. u should be worrying about ACTA. its even worse than SOPA. its already been signed by most countries including ours and by the euro union. plus poland signed it yesterday. a couple more sigs. and it will be enforced big time. so please think before writing a FAIL comment
imhungry4444 4 weeks ago
go condit...
YZER83MAN 4 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
I love the fact that Henry Rollins was doing the commentary. Henry is a perfect fit for this role.
whhardiek1972 4 weeks ago
SOPA / PIPA is gone and done with who fucking cares
wade2thehamilton 4 weeks ago
Lol at the dislikes
MALIRIPPA 4 weeks ago
the dislikes are from the support of that SOPA crap by the UFC. People are just trying to let theem know.
useless241 4 weeks ago
who freakin' disliked this??? Two of the best welterweights are going to clash and you dislike it????
kenansinav1 4 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@kenansinav1 people are disliking all ufc vids lately cus they support sopa
Desi9 4 weeks ago
Why the dislikes? Internet trolls -_-
FightMusic94 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FightMusic94 people are disliking all ufc vids lately cus they support sopa
Desi9 4 weeks ago
U can't stop the web .fellow piratebayers
shoveah1 4 weeks ago
I love to fuck doggystyle
ohhroach 4 weeks ago 36
@ohhroach bad part: you do it with guys. ouch.
kenfo0 2 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
Condit needs to knock his fucking lights out
The510CARLOS 4 weeks ago in playlist More videos from UFC
Yes! I've always thought Nick Diaz was a very misunderstood person.
This fight will be an absolute barnburner.
JaxenChaz 4 weeks ago
Nick is the most misunderstood fighter ever.
theDeanxD 4 weeks ago
Why this video had so many dislike？
kingptian 4 weeks ago in playlist UFC的其他视频
Conduit is just another bum for GSP to fuck. DIAZ is the real deal, and a Legend in the making. WAR DIAZ!
idontfkinknow1234 4 weeks ago
Condit win!
pedrobraganunes 4 weeks ago
Am I the only one experiencing the video stopping and having a message saying "Invalid Parameters"
xInfamous187x 4 weeks ago
@xInfamous187x yes
man0verboard 4 weeks ago
Diaz all day
8fistproduction 4 weeks ago
@718southpark no he called them both out after his fight with penn
manual138 4 weeks ago 16
THUG LIFE!!!!
Futang808 4 weeks ago
sopa/pipa sound good compared to ACTA look it up stop the end of the internet
TheunstopableDouche 4 weeks ago
wtf
nick diaz never said where you at carlos, he said where you at george
718southpark 4 weeks ago 8
@718southpark I thought the same thing but if you try to lipread it clearly shows him pronouncing "carlos". It wasnt show by camera in ufc 137.
fLrzi 4 weeks ago
@718southpark
how did you get 10 thumbs up :D You can see with your own eyes from the video above that Diaz said "where you at Carlos". You thought it was photoshopped, or..
MrAlala911 4 weeks ago
I gotta have that song. What's it called
WolfmanDan2012 4 weeks ago
WHY THE FUCK ARE THESE VIDEOS GETTING SO MANY DISLIKES?? SOMEONE EXPLAIN.
Latissimus65 4 weeks ago
DIAZ BROS ARE STREET SCUM
BenbanksTV 4 weeks ago
All you SOPA activists should more care about ACTA wich was actually voted on 26 of January 2012 without anybody knowing... And it s worse than SOPA believe me.
wowmats 4 weeks ago
"Where you at Carlos?" Fuck you UFC!
IauthenticI 4 weeks ago
Someone please explain what is SOPA ?
Xenalovesbieberr 4 weeks ago
FUCK SOPA DASNHDA;LKSJDALSKA
QofLife69 4 weeks ago
SOPA is over. Also, how would disliking a video on youtube solve anything?
TheAdrenaline321 4 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
@TheAdrenaline321 SOPA isn't over you ignorant retard... it has been delayed , but it's in the shadows waiting for the right time.
matheuswoww 4 weeks ago
I like how all the kiddies bitch here and not to dana on fb
bighed33 4 weeks ago
@bighed33 good idea
cuishi14 4 weeks ago
I HATE SOPA BUT STILL NEED TO SUPORT THE FIGHTERS
132music 4 weeks ago
Dana White on SOPA: "Is SOPA the perfect bill? No, it's not," he said. "The only thing that we're focused on is piracy. Piracy is stealing. If you walk into a store and you steal a gold watch, it's the same as stealing a pay-per-view. I don't care what your twisted, demented idea of stealing is. This kids who grew up on the Internet never had to pay for anything, so they don't think that you should have to."
manual138 4 weeks ago in playlist More videos from UFC
Bruce Lee quote : " belts are only good for holding up your pants ".
I have black belts in a few martial arts ( Judo, japanese Jiu-Jitsu, Aikido, Krav Maga ( self-defense ) and i teach Capoeira as a fight ) and i´m humble enough not to be a SHOW OFF with them like these guys and going around there saying what i just did...oh wait, damn it, i did it :)
Btw, i´m 32 and i practice martial arts since i was 3/4 years old.
anjoLas 4 weeks ago
@anjoLas key board warrior lmao nice CV
MainTerror 4 weeks ago
@MainTerror : " mainterror " uuuuh you´re scary !! i pitty u :)
anjoLas 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Condit is scary when he was talking about the ref pulling you off to save your life but diaz is just crazy, can't wait for this fight!!
manual138 4 weeks ago in playlist More videos from UFC
Diaz has amazing cardio and boxing, Condit is super athletic and very well rounded. I'm excited for this fight.
jaminboy 4 weeks ago
damn nick diaz is pretty retarded man
Gamekingz0r1 4 weeks ago
GOOO CARLOS!!!!!!
ugtyper 4 weeks ago
LOL EVERY BUISENESS COMPANY IS AGAINST SOPA LOL THE UFC LOSSES MILIONS OF DOLARS BECAUSE OF PIRACY SO DONT WINE ABOUT IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UFCvsStrikeforce 4 weeks ago
LOL really guys? Disliking because they support sopa. Grow up.
ArmTriangleChoke 4 weeks ago
ooooohohoowow Dislinking the videos will help sooo much !!! fuckers....
MrSouwersFan 4 weeks ago
Oh shit thats gonna be good!
roseagain2 4 weeks ago
SOPA isn't dead. It was shelved. It can come back whenever. They're making laws just like SOPA but slightly different to sneak in. Look up ACTA
f4m1lyguyftw 4 weeks ago
I like this matchup better to be honest..
moimasiclat 4 weeks ago
ur ufc video player is garbage
Modaragamage7 4 weeks ago
LIKE THE VIDEO! Don't take away from the fighters. The UFC were wrong.. IT WAS A BUSINESS MOVE, BUT DON'T TAKE AWAY FROM THE FIGHTERS.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Robespierr more like if you werent ignorant yous be a fans
jjohnson218 4 weeks ago
SOPA is dead, but UFC did support them.. and that means they support ACTA (Which within 1 week will be passed, no doubt about it.).. as a Company.. they can't outright support ACTA, but behind the scenes we all know they're giving us the finger. (BTW.. ACTA is SOPA x 1000)
TheOfficialiKON 4 weeks ago
all you guys downvoting the video , are stupid our 12...
miguelbombardauno 4 weeks ago
Condit, please dont follow the same game plan as Cerrones dumb ass! When Diaz says,"dont use that gay wrestling shit",, It's because hes knows it'll throw him off. Get the win and leave nothing up to those dumb fuxs, that the ufc calls their judges. And don't accept money from whoever is paying these other fighters off!! This is why we don't watch boxing anymore.. Condit for the win!
solejoeyaol 4 weeks ago
Lorenzo and Dana don't give a shit if you dislike these videos for supporting SOPA.
Grounz3r0 4 weeks ago
Enough of the SOPA stuff idiots do you think these guys are the only company that supports SOPA , PIPA, or any other thing you don't like that might get paste at some point. SOPA was delayed because it lost it once overwhelming support and the UFC or THQ maybe able to buy politicians but we can just speak up again and shut it down like last time. Most of you complaining about it probable did nothing to stop it like I did so either do something or shut up. Voting down on a game isn't helpful.
40scars 4 weeks ago
Diaz via showing up.
UsurperOfThrones 4 weeks ago
Fuck all you bitchass haters...
Diaz all day
Bbyslim87 4 weeks ago
@Bbyslim87 why would any body hate someone like Diaz, he acts like a Gentleman all the time with a demeanor fit for a President
psychick99 4 weeks ago in playlist UFC 143: Diaz vs Condit
All the likes from this video works for SOPA
itsdanielreviews 4 weeks ago
Condit all the Way
mitsubishidiamante 4 weeks ago
diaz = endurance
MrRaphaloz 4 weeks ago
condit is going to fuck diaz up!
impact296 4 weeks ago
ACTA now...
MrFlyingflipflop 4 weeks ago
When and where is this airing ?
ZipFlip817 4 weeks ago
its so beautiful
sammyrocksu 4 weeks ago
interim belts are so pointless
PaulSimsDaBoss 4 weeks ago
i hate Nick he doesnt deserve i contract i do
Prankzter4 4 weeks ago
i hope this one's going to last more that 1 round! epic fight it will be
hugoderboss1 4 weeks ago
both mexicans
themeaningoflife38 4 weeks ago
DOWNVOTE ALL UFC VIDEOS UNTIL THEY STOP SUPPORTING SOPA THAT WILL RUIN THE INTERNET WE LOVE
we love MMA we love the UFC but we dont want SOPA!
keikuru1 4 weeks ago 105
@keikuru1 i'm sure they give a fuck, i hate SOPA, but ppl like you oversimplifying these issues trivialises them
honkyxadonis 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 FUCK YOU
Genndronn 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 Do you honestly believe that a dislike on a video will stop or change the UFC's mind on supporting SOPA!?!? " OH no! theyre disliking our YOUTUBE videos" Hahahahahah.. You might aswell go to wall street and bitch about the 1%..
shroyuken904 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 there not doing sopa anymore chill out.
LMAOcarlitos 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 SOPA ended get with the times old man
TheOreoswithmilk 4 weeks ago
@TheOreoswithmilk sopa was only shelved man its not gone these cunt politicians are gonna wait till more people believe its gonna to ninja it into law
wigler420 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 do you know that there is no sopa any more?! this shows that you dont know shit about sopa... its just "cool"
miguelbombardauno 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 I thought the UFC don't support SOPA.
808wonderboy 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 Hey UFC is just protecting its product
wisdom261 4 weeks ago
@keikuru1 Then why take away from the fighters by demoting the fight with dislikes? I don't support sopa or pip, but I understand their business decision. I also don't advocate torrenting fights. They were wrong but why dislike the video? If you really felt strongly about the bills you would have contacted your representative. I'm not a sheep and I don't appreciate the bullshit. You're no better than the corps.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago 27
@Alpinex105 in the end of the day, fighters get paid for their results in the cage, not for the likes in the youtube preview of their fights.
fabiofragelli 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Demoting the youtube videos for a clear and obvious reason easily readable in the comments doesn't take anything away from the fighters, but from the company that only cares about profit and not about the people. There videos are publicity, they are hype, the fighters don't care about their reception because it's a bunch of edited content that doesn't represent them in the first place. You're boykotting your own freedom with your comments
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen Of course they care about the profits. They care about their gains just as much as you care about yours. You do realize that they get bonuses based on PPV buys? Those bonuses are a huge chunk of their earnings. To some extent corporations care about their consumers. Dana Whites promotions certainly go a long way. I disagree with SOPA but I could certainly understand why they would support the bill. If you want me to expand on anything let me know.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 No, corporations these days don't care about their consumers at all and let's face it, the world as a whole is going left, not right: if people are widely complaining about any of these antisocial bills or simply behaviors, it simply means that our society is moving back to socialism like it should. And by socialism I mean the real socialism Marx and Lenin have been preaching, not the regimes of egotistical monarchs like Stalin or Hu Jintao who don't understand equality.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen PART 1 Now keep in mind generalizations are not very useful in discussions about a particular issue. They have to to some extent. It's one of the most common rule of economics. If they don't support their consumers (this takes many forms) they don't have a consumer base. Which means no profits and no need for corp to exist. Exxon anyone? I don't really care about political prestige or the political concept of left vs right. I find them destructive to democratic institutions.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 You don't care about the concept of left and right yet the ideas you illustrate are totally right wing wanting to give corporations all the freedom they want. Corporations should be controlled because people at their heads profit too much while the people at the bottom of the bottom of the pyramid within the corporation itself barely survive. It's not overgeneralising, it's having principles.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen " You don't care about the concept of left and right yet the ideas you illustrate are totally right wing wanting to give corporations all the freedom they want." I don't understand how you got that from my posts. Could you please quote me. Corporations are controlled to some extent through economic regulations/monetary systems ect. Oh Labour laws/safety/criminal laws. I'm not a republican or a democrat. I'm an independent and I don't like the labelling technique to discredit.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 I can't "quote" what shows me that you're way to the right, because it's the ensemble of all your comments, but to sum it all up in a few words it'S the way you defend big corporations like the ufc and their policies, calling them caring is an offense to socialism.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen I in many posts have told you I don't believe in this Ideology. I don't label myself as right or left. No it has nothing to do with that. It had to do with your original response. I also was criticizing your comments regarding marx, but does that make me a right wing - republican? That's an odd approach. I've already stated that this labelling tries to destroy credibility. The right use it on the left and the left use it on the right. It's irrational.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Either you support equalty (left) or you don't (right), there is no labelling involved. (Or maybe you want to discuss that and the fact that blue is actually red and the universe is really only a product of your own imagination)
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen There are variations as well. I think you are clear about this concept. Remember you pointed out Canadian left and American left are very different from your views. Also socialism and communism are not on the same level in the political spectrum.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Actually, communism equals socialism, arguably anarchy equals socialism even more but what is anarchy but the utopic representation of what communism should be.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen It's exactly what FOX news anchors do to discredit opposing views. "Left wing- Liberal ideology". Its similar to the masculinisation of militarisation and ideological cohesion. If you don't like the kill or support the military your a "sissy or pussy". You have labelled me a "right wing" because I oppose your views. "because liberals criticizing liberals" or "socialists and socialists" doesn't exist.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 The most left wing of americans or canadians is still a right wing in my eyes and in the eyes of any socialist. Maybe to you this is a discussion between socialists but to me it is most certainly not any I can assure you, you'Re going to meet many a real european socialist in your life that is ten times less open minded than me.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen Left wing Canadian and left wing American are two different extremes. It doesn't matter who it's a discussion between. What matters is the argument. The substance is what matters.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 What matters is the idealogy, the philosophy, what you think, why you think that. That's what matters. Stop being such an occultist, it's really not getting any debate anywhere.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen Well the issues of political philosophy you brought up. I just wanted to talk about the Unlike = not promoting fighters and that the UFC gives to the fans. You agreed with one of them. The rest is just irrelevant.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 The money the UFC doesn't make from us shouldn't be taken away from the fighters, but from the owners who buy ferraris because they don'T know ehre to put their dollars.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 My original comment was that we had every right to boykot an organisation because it doesn't stand for what we believe and that we should not have to care about the fighters because clearly, the company has the ressources to pay them regadless if only they would be more equal in how they distribute their income among their employees. Do you get my point and the whole philosophical debate it created when I put it like that?
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen More fair? Why do we assume the fighters are not Partners? Some searching would help. FIghters have become partners with the UFC bonus pay structure.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen There would be two problems 1) What incentives would the fighters have to compete?
2) The philosophical debate is irrelevant. We're talking about the current framework and if the demoting of this video effects the fighters. WITHIN this framework. That is what I stressed.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 The fact that we're not living in the world we would like to live in doesn't mean we shouldn't want to live in the world we want to live in. It's almost 5 AM here and I'm supposed to get up in 3 hours so I'm really going to let go of this now. Goodnight
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen Well it depends on who you talk to. Generalization is not a good way of getting points across. Ok goodnight. Keep in mind you don't have to respond now. It's youtube respond when you have the time
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Well we might resume our little debate some other time then, hopefully not on this obnoxious platform. Ciao
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen PART 2 but that's an entirely different conversation. Well if your a believer in the political shift keep in mind the political movements act like a pendulum that sway back and forth, but again that's a political discussion I don't want to get into because it diverts our attention away from the real issue. Marx and Lenin? They had many contradictory philosophical views (of state), but again lets stick with the UFC. Your touching on many different issues that had nothing to do wi
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
Marx and Lenin shared an idea, I'm not talking about their respective opinions on the execution of their plans to make the world a better and fair place, of course they were going to be different but eventually they could have found common soil. You need to stop lecturing me and realise that as long as you refuse to justify the principles behind your ideas by discussing them in depth (and of course that implies "drifting away from the topic") the things you say don't have any weight.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen Fair place? The bourgeoisie totally didn't exist during Communist Russia (which many theorist don't consider to be communists). I agree the world needs to be a better and safer place, but what about the issue of Dislikes and likes? I'm addressing your original concerns which has nothing to do with this political discussion.
Just a thought are there other economic-political-social ideologies that could lead to a better safer world other than "communism"?
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Of course communist russia wasn't socialism, Lenin was a socialist but after Lenin everything went to shit. I don't understand why you would point out flaws in a system like it somehow proves the idea behind it is equally flawed then acknowledge that in fact the system was not respecting it's own idea.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen No I pointed out that Lenin and Marx had different ideologies or conceptualisations of what socialism should be. My intensions were to adress your point about marx and lenin. This has nothing to do with the main post you responded to by the way. There are no emotional attachments to my recent posts. There are no tones. This is text it's hard to point out what I really thinking... You have to go by the text..This is the problem with the spectrum. Right wing creates a particular ima
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Pointing out details in my comparison of LEnin to Marx is certainly more off topic than anything I have said until now. You seem to assume, for no reason, that I don't know they aren't perfect clones of one another. In the end they are both socialist extremists who envision a world where everyone is equal in complete opposition with right wing parties who spread word about the "american dream" and power in the hands of the few.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen No I did't assume. I just pointed out that they believed in very different ideologies. Which is why many communists don't consider the USSR as communists. I pointed out that there were huge disparities between the ruling and everyone else. The hand of the few? Couldn't that apply to communist russia?
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Communist russia wasn't socialism (am I not repeating myself enough? I'm one of those people you talk about) and ideally, there should be no disparities between leader and people in a real and functional communism or it wouldn't be socialism.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen "The phrase 'Socialist state', often called 'Communist states' in the West, is widely used by Leninists and Marxist-Leninists in reference to a state under the control of a Vanguard party that is organizing the economic, social and political affairs of said state toward the construction of socialism" wikipedia.. I should have been specific my apologies.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 But I'm certain the 23 year old John Jones just bought a Bentley. Maybe they are both the upper class. OH NO!
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 That's food for another discussion. I don't agree that a fighter like Jones earns more than a fighter like Pat Barry. I understand why people want more money, but I believe they shouldn't want more than they need. This counts for Dana but also for certain fighters, musicians, actors, and the list goes on forever. This world is a pretty fucked up place right now in terms of equality.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen Why not? He has the belt after all and draws in more PPV buys..More than they want? It doesn't really matter. Within the current framework they have a good arrangement. If you really feel strongly about shift the framework you should fight the cause through democratic instituions.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 I'm sorry man but eventually you don't have a point. The world is shifting as we speak and the framework you're talking about is no longer what the people want. That's why I bring up PIPA, SOPA, ACTA, file sharing, piracy, equalty, socialism, ... to support my point of view when you're being conservative in your statement trying to somehow confine me to the rules of our current system when eventually this whole boykot is directed at the system. You will understand.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 I have to go now, you've been very patient, I can appreciate that if anything. Have a good weekend.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 That doesn't really mean this vanguard has to be supported by huge economical or military strength. Anarchy illustrates that.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen I knew this conversation was going to shift into a political discussion. Oh well.. At least they were issues worth ignoring.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen *image.. Ignore those. I'm not right wing or left. My views are mine alone and not how a particular party. This you have to be clear about.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen PART 3 with my response and I would really like for you to stay on the original topic. I really don't want to get into political-theoretical studies.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen I've also mentioned how they have to some extent provide their clients with some sort of "care" if they didn't they wouldn't exist as a corporate entity. If "They don't give the people what they want" then no one will purchase UFC products.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Those are marketing stunts, the truth is they still support SOPA, PIPA and ACTA and might harm more people than only their fans in the process. Also, if some people in the UFC make too much money that means that from a socialistic point of view they are still now caring about their fans NEARLY enough if at all. (I'm being really openminded here and assuming it might not be 100% marketing)
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen They are that is correct, but to say thats not some sort of "corp UFC positive give back to the people" is odd to me. OK so they do care but not enough... See the confusion came with they don't care at all. Ok so now we agree on that issue. Whether they do to a little or alot I don't care about. What I do care about is that you acknowledge that they do. Free tickets/ppvs ect.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 Truth is I never thought they really cared, but just for the sake of argument I agreed to put that aside and assume it's not all a marketing stunt (I mean the givaways and such), which it probably is, to keep people like yourself convinced they actually care. It's much like celebreties giving away 1% of their purse to charity and pretending it's a big deal and people believing it's true because 1% is still a lot of money in their eyes.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 The fact that Dana White owns several cars like his million dollar black ferrari shows just how much he cares about giving and taking just what he needs and how much he understand about sharing or equality.
MathijsMoonen 4 weeks ago
@MathijsMoonen PART 3 Owns many cares therefore he doesn't care about giving and taking? The promoters generate the partial funds for the fighters. They could very well start up a cooperative. Leave that to the fighters. The fighters get bonuses if PPV sells a lot. So I think revenue is a relevant issue as it counters the argument presented which is Unliking the video = fighters don't care. If we consider that the video promotes buying of product.
Alpinex105 4 weeks ago