Will somebody tell me what the hell was the friggin point of Ford creating a car to be a rival against a car that went extinct 7 years prior to it!!!??
whatever happened to caprices...no one ever mentions them....they were some of the best police cars in their time...ive brought them back however..i have the only 95 chevy caprice with a 383 stroker...so be on the lookout youtube
Wth! This touch screen is getting on my nerves! Marauders should be winning by bus lengths since the came out seven yrs later than the SS but the dont. That becuz they r hop up p71's. A 9c1 with a intake, exhaust and tune should beat a Marauder with no problem. U 4.6 guys r givin yall selves too much credit. I think the Marauders have 4.9 too. Doesnt
@gmphasst It's not really a short coming though. The SS was a VERY good car when it came out. I owned a 2004 p71 and the 4.6L v8 is not half as good as the LT1 is. The LT! would be a hard engine to compete with.
I was tryna say more than likely dont r not runnin 9c1 caprice. Yall ford dudes need to stop fraudin. Put a 9c1 up against a p71 and lets see wut happens. We already saw wut happened with marauder. It cleary lost. So wut he spun. He still lost. A marauder should be winning
U see, this is y u ford dudes smoke dope. A p71 will never beat an impala stock for stock. Marauders r faster by like .2 seconds on the 1/4 mile. I have seen a marauder beat an SS in a street race. To lt1 cars losing to crown vics, u more that like
typical chevy, tries to leave early and still gets run down. if the impalas EVER outperformed the crown vics, which they didn't, they probably would've kept making them, which they didn't. i read the tests from like 94 or 95, the crown vic out-accelerated, outbraked, and outhandled the SS while getting better fuel economy and having a better repair rating. neverming the ugliness factor...
@knucklehead0202 Where in the world do you get your info from? No stock Vic ever outperformed an Impala SS, or 9C1 Caprice. Ask any cop who was around to to drive the 9C1, they'll tell you the Vic is lame by comparison. Crown Vic was second choice. Only reason GM stopped making the B-body, was because they wanted to build more trucks and SUV's. And now, Ford is about to do the same retarded thing GM did in '96, which is stop building they're best car. Just when the Vic was better than ever.
@LateNightCable info from Car&Driver, Road&Track, AND many officers who drove them, told the tale. i guess if you had a modified SS and a stock, single-exhaust grandpa crown vic, you MIGHT beat it, but that's a stretch. having driven both, i'll take the Ford any damn day of the week. look what's still on the road. crown vics of the last 15-20 yrs everywhere, and i see a random impala or caprice now and then. they didn't sell nears as many, and not many still run. 'nuff said.
@knucklehead0202 It takes a modified SS to beat a standard Vic? That's utter nonsense. The 9C1 LT1 Caprice in it's time - a 140+ mph car, outpaced the P71 Vic all day. Even with 3.27 gears the Vic was limited to 129 mph due to harmonic vibration in the driveline, and the 4.6 was never a powerhouse. And of course you see more Vics than Caprice because they're still being built. But to be honest, I'm just not seeing 15-20 year old Vics around either. You're a Ford guy, but don't make stuff up.
@LateNightCable stock yes their drive shaft cant handle 129+ but mauraders and p71 has lighter aLUMINUM DRIVE SHAFTs for speed over 140+ yes that 4.6 will beat that bulky 5.7 all day p71 specs 4.6 with dual overheadcams oil and trans cooler made to run 2 least 18hrs a day without being cut off and where im from bham al pehlam police dept went from ford to chevy and back 2 ford reason 07 imp they couldnt even get 40,000 miles out em so they went back to ford
and 03(4.6) maurder vs 96(5.7) impala maurader 302hp 318 pound feet of torque @4300 rpm dohc 32 valve 4.6 v8 while the bulky impala 5.7 spec are only had 260hp with 330 pounds of torque 4.6 has more hp than a 5.7 chevy yea thats what ford do i aint hating but the truth hurts i have nothing against chevy but road debris from me flying by em lol in a FORD!!!!
@ajfnine I like the CVPI a lot, but it or the Marauder were not built to handle sustained high speeds over 130. They have durability issues concerning the driveline. The only reason cops drive so many Fords today is because they had no other options after Chevy stopped making the rock solid B-body 9C1 - which also had oil and trans coolers. The CV's 4.6 is a fine engine, esp for a 4.6. But it doesn't top the old 5.7 LT-1 for anything. Alas, they no longer make any of these cars, and that's sad.
contin wit last comment: I had battle wit one and they are fast but don't take a LT1 for its weakness it also can outrun them and perform well them..So dont talk about these carz ESPECIALLY these cars if you dont your homework and know what u are saying..Later
I might as well correct people on here anyway... first off LT1 are faster off line due to Torque my lt1 waz alwayz good on digs.. Second it ain't just the two carz are slow or not its because you gotta know how to drive them too...Next 4.6 cobra they are good for roll runs and sometimes dig too.. But Impala always gonna out perform marauder.. so it aint about the power, its all about the Driver it self too.. for my experience.. Don't get me wrong tho marauders are pretty swift I had battle wit 1
Marauder has 3.55 gears with a 4.6 dohc that makes just over 300hp. Impala has a just shy of 300hp lt1. I say the marauder will win, top end or low end. More power, less weight, turn more rpm. So much for "chevy is a top end motor" that 4.6 will rap over 7,000rpm stock. Get some.
A 3.23? Thats not even a ford rear end gear ratio. Stop guessing numbers and do some homework.
@FoxBodyMike1 LT1 isn't 'just shy' of 300 hp (if the factory engine). It's only 260 hp. My neighbor had a Marauder when they came out...raced my 1994 Caprice (factory) with the 5.7. Was almost even, but he always chipped away.
Lol! Dog impala's have 3.08 gear ratio marauder's have 3.23 or something higher which means good off the light 3.08 are highway gears and the chevy's are top in cars unless you modified them I'm in the process of putting a 6 speed in my imp with 4.10 when shit on one the ford lol! I will send you the video lean more about your car and chevy cars before you make a statement I don't know what b.s. Imp you been running my shit run but you will be the first to get the video best beleave that.
im gonna call bulshit because the marauder had diff engine than ur police interceptor....well not really a diff engine as much as a diff spec 4.6. the maruader i beleive had 3.55s....the ss has 3.08s... not too mention the trans is not s faster shifting trans as much as its a beefed up one so im gonna need 2 see some proof of u beating 1 b4 its beleivable
@bergaflickal actualy you would be surprised how SOME crown vic are faster than marauder on a 1-4 mile track.Marauder will run low 15's to high 14's stock for a 300hp car there is nothing to brag abouth the marauder is desperatly lacking of low end torque off the line but once you hit 4000 rpms the doch really makes his job..enought to catch up an ss before the end of the track ?the answer is no
If you really want to bring facts bring both cars on a real track under controled parameter
@p71c1 im sorry man i dont think so i grew up around police interceptors my dads a liutenant of pd around here and i know for a fact no stock crown vic is gonna beat an ss in any way shape or form through turns on a course unless it has a shitty driver unless u mod the crown vic its never gonna keep up...and i own a 96 impala and have ran from the cops on a couple of occasions lol not that i needed 2
@bergaflickal marauder are 32v instead of 16v they comes with 3.55 and 3.55 are also factory on police interceptor although most will comes with 3.27.
61galaxyboy haaaahaaaa!!! Are you serious let me tell ya a rear end and intake do take up for displacement (engine size) 4.6 is a like a 284 or 298 something like that, 5.7 is 350 you do the math them 350 are top in motor's you may look good off the light but after 80 and above bye bye oh I own a 94 imp and I bury Vic and mercury's and I'm stock for now unless you got the cobra motor with a supercharger to make up for what your engine don't have then it's a rap! Slim.
@Chevyman164 Stop lying you don't know what you're talking about. A LT1 is faster off the line than the marauder but from a rolling start a marauder would leave a ss in the dust. The SS is made for coming off the line. The marauder doesn't open up until it hits about 35-45mph.
@Chevyman164 crown vics are fucking slow .. the 4.6 marauder is a cobra motor, the 4.6 crown vic is not. its a 2v truck motor basically ... the 281 in a marauder is a cobra motor without a super charger, they put out more power then an impala ss and there within like 50 pounds of eachother .. however the 350 is a much easier motor to make fast ... either car really cant go wrong but dont go comparing no crown vics to impala ss's ...
@Chevyman164 man shut up you dont even know what you're talking about, The marauder had a top end pulling motor and the ss is known for its low end torque. From a roll a marauder will destroy a ss.
@Chevyman164 hey man not trying to start anything but 350 heads are shit if you dont throw money at it so the 350 with displacement alone means nothing when you throw a big cam gear drive and a bigger carb/bigger injectors and intake combos(and i have built both 2 and 4 bolt mains) not to mention the seals after about 33000 miles leaked oil. Point is every engine has potential to beat the others NONE of them are the "TOP". Others wouldn't sell and trust me i've seen built 4.6s fly by 350s bro
@Chevyman164 its a 4.6 4v dohc 281 cid in the marauder and the vics are 4.6 2v sohc 281 cid.....my grand marquis pulls like a rocket on top end but i have 2.73's ....on the freeway i kill impalas all day long with my 2 valve.....
@widerule1000 The Impala Did Take It But Only By A Fender.....But I Beat The Impala In My Crown Vic Police Interceptor With Marauder Rearend And A Cold Air Intake And Maruder Trans.....LMAO
F(ound) O(n) R(oad) D(ead)
NextLevelEnt87 1 week ago
Epic body-on-frame war! I love them!!
The91Diesel 2 weeks ago
impala, marauder, and crown vic is where it's at
Aboxinhamster 3 weeks ago
the impalas tranny goes out a lot
yoscotti 3 months ago
@yoscotti ... not true... r-700 trannys are very strong and reliable.....
CHEVYRYDA215 2 months ago
i have a crown vic they r fast but i know they cant beat an impala ss in a drag race but the marauder just might
Kingjones33rd 4 months ago
a 4.6 is not a 302.
jeepers2655 6 months ago
@jeepers2655 5.0 is a
302
ajfnine 3 months ago
Will somebody tell me what the hell was the friggin point of Ford creating a car to be a rival against a car that went extinct 7 years prior to it!!!??
gabed96 7 months ago
whatever happened to caprices...no one ever mentions them....they were some of the best police cars in their time...ive brought them back however..i have the only 95 chevy caprice with a 383 stroker...so be on the lookout youtube
chaunte757 8 months ago
bad mercury driver
imserious2187 8 months ago
this why the impala stuck around longer
kuhndog52 9 months ago
"have not seen a Marauder beat an SS in a street race" " Caprices losing to p71's most likely r not running 9c1's" Just editing my posts.
gmphasst 10 months ago
@gmphasst i have seen a marauder smash a impala ss. and caprice and p71 aint gone lie culd go anyway.
MegaSkokie 7 months ago
matter. The ole Imp will still takem for a walk.
gmphasst 10 months ago
Wth! This touch screen is getting on my nerves! Marauders should be winning by bus lengths since the came out seven yrs later than the SS but the dont. That becuz they r hop up p71's. A 9c1 with a intake, exhaust and tune should beat a Marauder with no problem. U 4.6 guys r givin yall selves too much credit. I think the Marauders have 4.9 too. Doesnt
gmphasst 10 months ago
@gmphasst It's not really a short coming though. The SS was a VERY good car when it came out. I owned a 2004 p71 and the 4.6L v8 is not half as good as the LT1 is. The LT! would be a hard engine to compete with.
crackparty 5 months ago
I was tryna say more than likely dont r not runnin 9c1 caprice. Yall ford dudes need to stop fraudin. Put a 9c1 up against a p71 and lets see wut happens. We already saw wut happened with marauder. It cleary lost. So wut he spun. He still lost. A marauder should be winning
gmphasst 10 months ago
U see, this is y u ford dudes smoke dope. A p71 will never beat an impala stock for stock. Marauders r faster by like .2 seconds on the 1/4 mile. I have seen a marauder beat an SS in a street race. To lt1 cars losing to crown vics, u more that like
gmphasst 10 months ago
even a decade later the impala is the king of the muscle sedans
kuhndog52 10 months ago
typical chevy, tries to leave early and still gets run down. if the impalas EVER outperformed the crown vics, which they didn't, they probably would've kept making them, which they didn't. i read the tests from like 94 or 95, the crown vic out-accelerated, outbraked, and outhandled the SS while getting better fuel economy and having a better repair rating. neverming the ugliness factor...
knucklehead0202 11 months ago
@knucklehead0202 Where in the world do you get your info from? No stock Vic ever outperformed an Impala SS, or 9C1 Caprice. Ask any cop who was around to to drive the 9C1, they'll tell you the Vic is lame by comparison. Crown Vic was second choice. Only reason GM stopped making the B-body, was because they wanted to build more trucks and SUV's. And now, Ford is about to do the same retarded thing GM did in '96, which is stop building they're best car. Just when the Vic was better than ever.
LateNightCable 10 months ago
@LateNightCable info from Car&Driver, Road&Track, AND many officers who drove them, told the tale. i guess if you had a modified SS and a stock, single-exhaust grandpa crown vic, you MIGHT beat it, but that's a stretch. having driven both, i'll take the Ford any damn day of the week. look what's still on the road. crown vics of the last 15-20 yrs everywhere, and i see a random impala or caprice now and then. they didn't sell nears as many, and not many still run. 'nuff said.
knucklehead0202 10 months ago
@knucklehead0202 It takes a modified SS to beat a standard Vic? That's utter nonsense. The 9C1 LT1 Caprice in it's time - a 140+ mph car, outpaced the P71 Vic all day. Even with 3.27 gears the Vic was limited to 129 mph due to harmonic vibration in the driveline, and the 4.6 was never a powerhouse. And of course you see more Vics than Caprice because they're still being built. But to be honest, I'm just not seeing 15-20 year old Vics around either. You're a Ford guy, but don't make stuff up.
LateNightCable 10 months ago
@LateNightCable stock yes their drive shaft cant handle 129+ but mauraders and p71 has lighter aLUMINUM DRIVE SHAFTs for speed over 140+ yes that 4.6 will beat that bulky 5.7 all day p71 specs 4.6 with dual overheadcams oil and trans cooler made to run 2 least 18hrs a day without being cut off and where im from bham al pehlam police dept went from ford to chevy and back 2 ford reason 07 imp they couldnt even get 40,000 miles out em so they went back to ford
ajfnine 3 months ago
they switched cause the fleet for chevy was1000$ cheaper but ended up sacrificing price for a quality For Only Real Drivers (copyrightTM ajfnine©) F first O on R race D day!!!!
ajfnine 3 months ago
and 03(4.6) maurder vs 96(5.7) impala maurader 302hp 318 pound feet of torque @4300 rpm dohc 32 valve 4.6 v8 while the bulky impala 5.7 spec are only had 260hp with 330 pounds of torque 4.6 has more hp than a 5.7 chevy yea thats what ford do i aint hating but the truth hurts i have nothing against chevy but road debris from me flying by em lol in a FORD!!!!
ajfnine 3 months ago
@ajfnine I like the CVPI a lot, but it or the Marauder were not built to handle sustained high speeds over 130. They have durability issues concerning the driveline. The only reason cops drive so many Fords today is because they had no other options after Chevy stopped making the rock solid B-body 9C1 - which also had oil and trans coolers. The CV's 4.6 is a fine engine, esp for a 4.6. But it doesn't top the old 5.7 LT-1 for anything. Alas, they no longer make any of these cars, and that's sad.
LateNightCable 3 months ago
contin wit last comment: I had battle wit one and they are fast but don't take a LT1 for its weakness it also can outrun them and perform well them..So dont talk about these carz ESPECIALLY these cars if you dont your homework and know what u are saying..Later
drpe 11 months ago
I might as well correct people on here anyway... first off LT1 are faster off line due to Torque my lt1 waz alwayz good on digs.. Second it ain't just the two carz are slow or not its because you gotta know how to drive them too...Next 4.6 cobra they are good for roll runs and sometimes dig too.. But Impala always gonna out perform marauder.. so it aint about the power, its all about the Driver it self too.. for my experience.. Don't get me wrong tho marauders are pretty swift I had battle wit 1
drpe 11 months ago
wtf kinda race is that
imserious2187 11 months ago
if that marauder woulda been the one that has the svt engine that impala woulda been left in the dust
MrBeenpimpin 1 year ago
@chevyman164
Marauder has 3.55 gears with a 4.6 dohc that makes just over 300hp. Impala has a just shy of 300hp lt1. I say the marauder will win, top end or low end. More power, less weight, turn more rpm. So much for "chevy is a top end motor" that 4.6 will rap over 7,000rpm stock. Get some.
A 3.23? Thats not even a ford rear end gear ratio. Stop guessing numbers and do some homework.
FoxBodyMike1 1 year ago
@FoxBodyMike1 LT1 isn't 'just shy' of 300 hp (if the factory engine). It's only 260 hp. My neighbor had a Marauder when they came out...raced my 1994 Caprice (factory) with the 5.7. Was almost even, but he always chipped away.
Thilindel 1 year ago
I will be ready by the summer how far are you from dc We can run for some $
Chevyman164 1 year ago
Ahh oldgateboy you know what ford stand right?????(found of road dead)
Chevyman164 1 year ago
Please excuse the wrong words I was just in rush to reply!
Chevyman164 1 year ago
Lol! Dog impala's have 3.08 gear ratio marauder's have 3.23 or something higher which means good off the light 3.08 are highway gears and the chevy's are top in cars unless you modified them I'm in the process of putting a 6 speed in my imp with 4.10 when shit on one the ford lol! I will send you the video lean more about your car and chevy cars before you make a statement I don't know what b.s. Imp you been running my shit run but you will be the first to get the video best beleave that.
Chevyman164 1 year ago
show me a vid of the crown vic winning and maybe ill believe it
bergaflickal 1 year ago
Comment removed
p71c1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bergaflickal dude go see my youtube account I have plenty of it
p71c1 1 year ago
im gonna call bulshit because the marauder had diff engine than ur police interceptor....well not really a diff engine as much as a diff spec 4.6. the maruader i beleive had 3.55s....the ss has 3.08s... not too mention the trans is not s faster shifting trans as much as its a beefed up one so im gonna need 2 see some proof of u beating 1 b4 its beleivable
bergaflickal 1 year ago
@bergaflickal actualy you would be surprised how SOME crown vic are faster than marauder on a 1-4 mile track.Marauder will run low 15's to high 14's stock for a 300hp car there is nothing to brag abouth the marauder is desperatly lacking of low end torque off the line but once you hit 4000 rpms the doch really makes his job..enought to catch up an ss before the end of the track ?the answer is no
If you really want to bring facts bring both cars on a real track under controled parameter
p71c1 1 year ago
@p71c1 im sorry man i dont think so i grew up around police interceptors my dads a liutenant of pd around here and i know for a fact no stock crown vic is gonna beat an ss in any way shape or form through turns on a course unless it has a shitty driver unless u mod the crown vic its never gonna keep up...and i own a 96 impala and have ran from the cops on a couple of occasions lol not that i needed 2
bergaflickal 1 year ago
@bergaflickal I never said anything like that...I said that my police interceptor is faster than some marauders
p71c1 1 year ago
@p71c1 ahh my apologies then i guess it was the other guy
bergaflickal 1 year ago
@bergaflickal He just needs to look up the youtube vid of stolen impala ss
MLKJRJR 1 year ago
@bergaflickal marauder are 32v instead of 16v they comes with 3.55 and 3.55 are also factory on police interceptor although most will comes with 3.27.
p71c1 1 year ago
at 1.10 u can clearly see the marauder spin from raising rpms but the cars are evenly matched. toss up. i own a marauder and but a 96 so...
03breeze 1 year ago
Lol! Okay, right .
Chevyman164 1 year ago
61galaxyboy haaaahaaaa!!! Are you serious let me tell ya a rear end and intake do take up for displacement (engine size) 4.6 is a like a 284 or 298 something like that, 5.7 is 350 you do the math them 350 are top in motor's you may look good off the light but after 80 and above bye bye oh I own a 94 imp and I bury Vic and mercury's and I'm stock for now unless you got the cobra motor with a supercharger to make up for what your engine don't have then it's a rap! Slim.
Chevyman164 1 year ago
@Chevyman164 LMAO I HAD A FEW More But I Beat So You say Say Engine Size All You Want But The Crown VIC WON HAHHAHAHhaahAAHHA..
61Galaxieboy 1 year ago
@Chevyman164 - I hear ya... I smoked plenty of Imps and Caprices in my 04' Marauder and I'm bone stock too.
dramaunitkeith 1 year ago
@Chevyman164 Stop lying you don't know what you're talking about. A LT1 is faster off the line than the marauder but from a rolling start a marauder would leave a ss in the dust. The SS is made for coming off the line. The marauder doesn't open up until it hits about 35-45mph.
oldgateway 1 year ago
@Chevyman164 crown vics are fucking slow .. the 4.6 marauder is a cobra motor, the 4.6 crown vic is not. its a 2v truck motor basically ... the 281 in a marauder is a cobra motor without a super charger, they put out more power then an impala ss and there within like 50 pounds of eachother .. however the 350 is a much easier motor to make fast ... either car really cant go wrong but dont go comparing no crown vics to impala ss's ...
Leafsrule016 11 months ago
@Chevyman164 man shut up you dont even know what you're talking about, The marauder had a top end pulling motor and the ss is known for its low end torque. From a roll a marauder will destroy a ss.
oldgateway 11 months ago
@Chevyman164 the marauder 4.6 has 302 you're thinking of the grand marquis with 284 and its DOHC
coolguy709 7 months ago
@Chevyman164 take on the interceptor. :) Never seen an SS beat mine... My 99 was stock.
MaikeP71 5 months ago
@Chevyman164 size in engine really means nothing
jordtizzle 3 months ago
@Chevyman164 hey man not trying to start anything but 350 heads are shit if you dont throw money at it so the 350 with displacement alone means nothing when you throw a big cam gear drive and a bigger carb/bigger injectors and intake combos(and i have built both 2 and 4 bolt mains) not to mention the seals after about 33000 miles leaked oil. Point is every engine has potential to beat the others NONE of them are the "TOP". Others wouldn't sell and trust me i've seen built 4.6s fly by 350s bro
ikaikaboy88 3 months ago
@Chevyman164 its a 4.6 4v dohc 281 cid in the marauder and the vics are 4.6 2v sohc 281 cid.....my grand marquis pulls like a rocket on top end but i have 2.73's ....on the freeway i kill impalas all day long with my 2 valve.....
TheSleepermgm 2 months ago
dats y tha impala barely won cuz its a 1996! dats y
drpe 1 year ago
MAN I LIKE BOTH, I CANT HATE ON EITHER ONE OF THEM, I THINK IM GOING TO BY ONE OF EACH LOL, BUT BIG UPS TO THE 96
jeffdaniel09 1 year ago
the impala won u can cleary see.. and @ 61 Galaxie boy ur joking about beating a impala with an interceptor right?? lol
capricess 1 year ago
whoa whoa wat year was dat impala? serious question!
drpe 1 year ago
@drpe 1996,
jeffdaniel09 1 year ago
man the marauder won and the freakin impala got a head start
neveen11 1 year ago 2
think the impala won not sure
widerule1000 1 year ago
@widerule1000 The Impala Did Take It But Only By A Fender.....But I Beat The Impala In My Crown Vic Police Interceptor With Marauder Rearend And A Cold Air Intake And Maruder Trans.....LMAO
61Galaxieboy 1 year ago
@61Galaxieboy no wonder, man those things got quick acceleration
BigDually58 1 year ago
WINNER?
KingFreak07 1 year ago
Hold up who won?
drpe 1 year ago 2