Isnt the History channel owned by News Corp.(Fox News Channel) they also puchased the majority share of NAT GEO...notice the program line-up on Nat Geo ..war,prisons,drugs,911, Jesus,armageddon,freak lifestyles,end of the world,border wars,lockdown,when aliens attack. Very little educational programming anymore.
JFK was the last real president, the rest since have been errand boys. They say history is written by the victors -- but nobody with a brain watches the History Channel anyway. Garbage.
History Channel is run by masons involved in implosions of 911 by satanists, occultists, masons, witches & kabbalists. Who put out that farce of Flt 93? No planes on 911 Flt #s were masonic symbols: 11-solar cycle 11 yrs from 1st GHWB NWO speech 911 1990 to WTC implosions 911 2001. 77=represents Mercury, god of Trade & Commerce, Hermes, God of Information (AKA, Lucifer) more
93=gematria (mason's G), numerical value for word will (thelema), Law & love-Aleister Crowley's saying 'do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law, love is the law love under will' the whole of the law, love is the law love under will' being narrowed down into numbers: 93 93 93/93. ...more
That is how those who follow thelema and Crowley's work greet each other. [See, lashtal. Com forums to see 93 93 93/93 reference.]
175 represents the Merovingian dynasty which still maintains its legitimacy & will one day openly assert the divine right of their nobility to rule the world as an angelic race of demi-gods, whose ancestors were the fallen angels.
The republicans criticism of John F. Kennedy is baseless. But the liberals romanticization of JFK is equally baseless. JFK did not care much about the civil rights movement. He was not for peace. He was a war monger who promoted cold war propaganda.
Id recommend reading some of Noam Chomsky's or Howard Zinn's writings about JFK. In a People's History of the US, Zinn details how JFK supported a racist governor in Alabama.
Just a quick historical anecdote to put Ted's alleged crimes in perspective. Pauline Pierce was a known follower of Aleister Crowley the foremost Satan worshipper in England. He also practices sex magic and held Satanic worship sex rituals. Pauline spent an entire year with him in England and came back to the US and her husband, PREGNANT with..Barbara BUSH. SO does that mean the George W. BUSH is the grandson of Satan? How about a DNA test, George?
Pauline Pierce had sex magick w Aleister Crowley in Paris (where Barbara was conceived), after he was deported from Abbey of Thelema by Mussolini for killing a man w putrid blood ritual. Ann Cappelletti, was conceived was conceived at Abbey of Thelema w 1 of many 20 yr old Sicilian girls for money. Ann's mother sailed to So. Phila after her birth. Ann & Barb got together in 1980 to get the witch Bushes into the WH.
GWB, John Cappelletti & siblings are granchildren of Aleister Crowley. J's demolition co. planted nano-thermite in WTC. John & Michael Cappelletti- starting demolition co in Southern Cal, expect blg implosions in SW US & No Cal which will lead to the cousins. Ann runs the Internet propaganda posters.
my god i cant fuckin believe history channel would do that. i love the history channel even with their stupid alien hunters show but if they run this im done. theres also i bigger thing im noticing, i feel the right wing feels a need to sorta fill a void, where the democrats there modern day patron saint in JFK the GOP has none. so theyve been going around trying to make reagan theres. even tho his record is terrible they're just making it up as they go along like always.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I just love shitting on the Kennedys, almost as much as I love watching leftists like Greenwald freak out over it. Nobody gives a shit what you think, Greenwald, and Surnow has no need to pay any attention to you. As for mischaracterizations of politicians, where were you on the Reagan or Bush docudramas?
What I really wish is that someone would do a documentary on Ted Kennedy. His own family doesn't even try to deny his 50+ plus years of drunken lechery. Only a fucking democrat liberal could be politically viable after causing the the death of a young woman in a drunken accident. Anyone who doesn't denounce Ted Kennedy is a piece of shit, so if crapping on his brother helps out, fine. Btw, he escalated Vietnam from 900 to 16,000 "advisors", and his weakness on Cuba invited the missile crisis.
No Tea Partier here - I hold them only in slightly higher regard than you, and that's saying something cuz I really hate slobbering liberal lapdogs, and if you're getting worked up about this, you are a lapdog of the left. Fyi, notice that you don't try and refute the facts I cite. Ted Kennedy was a drunken, lecherous killer and he deserves to be remembered as such. What if Mary Jo Kopechne - the woman he left to die - was your daughter? And JFK greatly escalated Vietnam, and was weak.
I'll cite one fact that is indisputable. According to Ted's own account of that evening, within 10 mins walk of the site where Ted drove the car off the bridge was a house with a phone that he walked by. If he had called emergency services, and the rescue diver on duty that night publicly stated that he could have been onsite, in the water within 20 mins of that call. His assessment of the crime scene was that Mary Jo Kopechne survived under water for quite some time, as did the autopsy.
His failure to make that call, aside from the fact that he was in a single car accident after eyewitnesses claimed he had been drinking at the party actually add up to at least vehicular manslaughter - hence my calling him a killer. As for being a drunk, he was legendary, if you don't know this, you don't know anything. His family didn't deny it and in his own words he talked uphemistically 'settling' down after marrying his last wife - at the age of 60. He was a pig, lech, drunk and killer.
I'm not defending Bush, you idiot. How you can not see what a complete scumbag Ted Kennedy was is a sad statement about who you are and how you've let politics infect your brain so much that you can't even see right from wrong anymore. Read a book about Chappaquidick before you run your mouth, the facts and public statements are devastating. I have been given first hand reports of his wild drinking episodes during his presidential run in '84 - whoring and drinking, recklessly.
It is inappropriate and inaccurate to demonized Ted Kennedy. While he DID act inappropriately at Chappaqudick he is NOT purposefully responsible for Mary Jo's death. It was an ACCIDENT. He was also a valued Senatorial leader who championed many useful, beneficial legislation. He DID have a drinking problem but does NOT deserve your biased smearing.
Why would the History Channel jeopardize its brand? Are you kidding me? How many bullshit shows do they do about Nostradamas, for one. And thats to say nothing of the insane amount of speculative work they do, like Life After People (granted, a cool show, but NOT HISTORY). The channel isn't really worth its name anymore half the time, even during its enjoyable programs.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Th Taliban and Al Qaeda LOVE people like Greenwald, because they know they just have to play a waiting game and people like greenwald will stir up public discontent for the wa, then the USA has to obey public outrage, then the Taliban wins.
I'm a liberal. But why do other liberals so fervently defend the Kennedy administration? He did some good things, and sure, he was an inspirational figure. Also, he killed tens -- if not hundreds -- of thousands of Americans and Vietnamese. He also tried to invade Cuba, which would have led to thousands upon thousands of more deaths if he had succeeded. This is not the kind of leader liberals should be idolizing.
These questions are irrelevant. One does not have to have lived during the Civil War in order to know about it. The fact of the matter is Kennedy killed many thousands of Americans, Vietnamese, and Cubans yet is still idolized by the left as some sort of hero. I understand the emotional ramifications of his assassination, and perhaps if he had finished out his term(s) he would have lived up to some liberal ideals. But he didn't.
@wnnw98: Look, I don't want to get into a pissing match with you, but you insist on interpreting historical events without understanding the period in which the events occurred. You obviously no nothing about the post-War era, which is why you prattle about 'liberal ideals' and so on.
I think that you do want to get into a "pissing match." Or else you wouldn't be trying to insult my intelligence.
Using the Cold War as an excuse for Kennedy's actions is not a proper argument for someone viewed as a liberal icon. In that regards, what separates him from Bush using the War on Terror to carry out an imperialistic foreign policy?
JFK actually wanted to get out of VIetnam. Eisenhower started that mess. Johnson made it worse. Nixon expanded it. Congress stopped it because John Lennon lead a revolution against it.
Kennedy tried to end it but that is one of the reasons why he was killed. Nixon extended it to China. The people, led by John Lennon, made congress end it.
What you have is the right wing point of view of the vietnam war.
I'm aware that its right, thank you for clarifying. Nixon had no war with China, you might be thinking of Cambodia. In fact he was the reason for the detente with China and Russia, going to China doesn't mean going to war with China.
I never said Obama was a liberal. I agree his is not a liberal. He is no better than Bush. Kennedy was a liberal. It was Einhowser that was the first to send troops into Vietnam. JFK was killed because he wanted to get out of vietnam and make the CIA only deal with intelligence matters. He was a real populist. Everyone else after him was controlled by the true corporate owners of America.
This is not the first 'great' civilization to erase/change history by way of arrogant propaganda for plolitical gain; why stop now. :o/ It is only a short sprint away before the kiddies history books start to read like a Glenn Beck/ Limbaugh primers. "It's a cor-por-ate country after all..."
Fantasy History channel. I stopped watching it long ago. How many times can you watch The History of the Gun and every foot of film footage of WWII. Another corporate propaganda outlet. I'm so tired of the hackneyed war stuff...America living on past military laurels while invading innocent countries to steal their oil.
Yes, lets keep deifying our presidents. The president already has more power than many kings had over their subjects. We are mere serfs. Just look at the plundering our royalty engaged in with the recent corporate welfare to the banks, auto industry and the unions.
And now they want to pass a health care bill that will give the insurance companies 30 million new customers.
The govt is a criminal enterprise, the smaller and less powerful we can make it the better off we will all be.
Remember: "YOU" are 'the government.' Saying you want less government is like saying you want less control of what happens in your country. "YOU" elect people to manage it and to do the things "YOU" want it to do. If you don't like what it's doing, it's up to "YOU" to change it, not destroy it. Even if it means forcibly removing them from office. If they have too much 'control' over you, it's because "YOU" gave it to them by doing nothing. You're paying them to do what YOU want.
This is a very naive view of how our system actually works. To think that politicians will not act in their self interest goes against all of history
The govt is a criminal enterprise used by various groups to enrich themselves and the politicians that help them. Most regulations are created for the benefit of corporations to create a financial and legal burden for competitors.
The Federal govt is the judge of its own powers, there is no longer any restraint on the powers of the federal govt.
It is not naive. It's the way it was designed to operate. Are you saying the government elects itself? The way the "system actually works" is because the 'american people' didn't do anything about anything for the past 20 or so years. Is it not this government...'By the people'? Doesn't that mean anything? If the people want their power (government) back they must get off the duff (e.g.,Europe). That is their responsibility. What's naive is to sit back and expect the gov to police themselves.
The system no longer operates as it was designed. It was designed such that the states delegated a few powers to the federal govt with the states remaining the sovereign entities. Good old Abe screwed up this system of states' rights when he caused the death of over 600,000 Americans.
We now have a non-functioning republic and a tyrannical federal govt with unchecked powers. And, we have transformed into a democracy where 51% of the population can plunder the minority.
Wow, the capitalization, quotation marks and repetition add so much to your insipid argument - not. Basic rights theory, visualized with entity modeling will demonstrate that 'you' aren't the government. There is a 'you' that interacts with the government but it is a distinct and separate entity. You watch way to much Maddow, enigma, it's turning your brain into mush.
Speaking of brain mush you may want to read Manufacturing Consent and take a look at how this Constitutional Republic was designed to operate, and how it continues to operate today.
Duped the History Channel? Tarnish their brand? The History Channel did respectable history programs just long enough to establish a reputation which it has sold to the highest bidder ever since. History Channel is nothing but a 24 hour infomercial.
ok then, the people that care about the truth are going to know its bs...the ones that watch fox news will not...and they will spout quotes from the movie all over youtube and teaparty conventions. Well have a more polarized country as a result and Sarah Palin is going to sell more books.
Fascist Democrats hate free speech. These are the same liberals who advocated killing the Danish cartoonists.
StoogeWatcher 6 months ago
Isnt the History channel owned by News Corp.(Fox News Channel) they also puchased the majority share of NAT GEO...notice the program line-up on Nat Geo ..war,prisons,drugs,911, Jesus,armageddon,freak lifestyles,end of the world,border wars,lockdown,when aliens attack. Very little educational programming anymore.
dazeend123 8 months ago in playlist Politics
Hollywood history WHEee
Darusdei 1 year ago
JFK was the last real president, the rest since have been errand boys. They say history is written by the victors -- but nobody with a brain watches the History Channel anyway. Garbage.
bc9021010001 1 year ago 2
@bc9021010001 JFK was the only good President we ever had..that is why the CIA killed him for the elite.
dazeend123 8 months ago in playlist Politics 2
The history channel used to be one of my fav's, But I noticed the change awhile back and stopped watching.
TheBlueConch 1 year ago
History Channel is run by masons involved in implosions of 911 by satanists, occultists, masons, witches & kabbalists. Who put out that farce of Flt 93? No planes on 911 Flt #s were masonic symbols: 11-solar cycle 11 yrs from 1st GHWB NWO speech 911 1990 to WTC implosions 911 2001. 77=represents Mercury, god of Trade & Commerce, Hermes, God of Information (AKA, Lucifer) more
074August 1 year ago
93=gematria (mason's G), numerical value for word will (thelema), Law & love-Aleister Crowley's saying 'do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law, love is the law love under will' the whole of the law, love is the law love under will' being narrowed down into numbers: 93 93 93/93. ...more
074August 1 year ago
cont
That is how those who follow thelema and Crowley's work greet each other. [See, lashtal. Com forums to see 93 93 93/93 reference.]
175 represents the Merovingian dynasty which still maintains its legitimacy & will one day openly assert the divine right of their nobility to rule the world as an angelic race of demi-gods, whose ancestors were the fallen angels.
074August 1 year ago
The republicans criticism of John F. Kennedy is baseless. But the liberals romanticization of JFK is equally baseless. JFK did not care much about the civil rights movement. He was not for peace. He was a war monger who promoted cold war propaganda.
Id recommend reading some of Noam Chomsky's or Howard Zinn's writings about JFK. In a People's History of the US, Zinn details how JFK supported a racist governor in Alabama.
woostopalypse 1 year ago
I ask all of you Kennedy defenders this question: what would you say if your daughter drowned in that car and was abandoned by Ted Kennedy?
akytilop 1 year ago
Only libturds know the truth, just ask them.
MrIfreeman 1 year ago
But THIS video IS about an [intentionally] misleading fictualization of JOHN F Kennedy's life.
waterflaws 1 year ago
Just a quick historical anecdote to put Ted's alleged crimes in perspective. Pauline Pierce was a known follower of Aleister Crowley the foremost Satan worshipper in England. He also practices sex magic and held Satanic worship sex rituals. Pauline spent an entire year with him in England and came back to the US and her husband, PREGNANT with..Barbara BUSH. SO does that mean the George W. BUSH is the grandson of Satan? How about a DNA test, George?
exenrontexas 1 year ago
@exenrontexas He is not the Grandson of Satan, he IS SATAN.
RustyTBone69 1 year ago
Pauline Pierce had sex magick w Aleister Crowley in Paris (where Barbara was conceived), after he was deported from Abbey of Thelema by Mussolini for killing a man w putrid blood ritual. Ann Cappelletti, was conceived was conceived at Abbey of Thelema w 1 of many 20 yr old Sicilian girls for money. Ann's mother sailed to So. Phila after her birth. Ann & Barb got together in 1980 to get the witch Bushes into the WH.
074August 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
google, Barbara Bush Aleister Crowley: some finds--cannonfire. blogspot. com/2006/04/george-w-bush-barbara-bush-and.html
portland.indymedia. org/en/2006/04/337857.shtml
rense. com/general77/acrow.htm
Pauline, 6th degree OTO sought sex w Crowley, chased Eisenhower, arranged marriage of Barb w Prescott. Kennedy murder was 11/22, masonic #s.
074August 1 year ago
GWB, John Cappelletti & siblings are granchildren of Aleister Crowley. J's demolition co. planted nano-thermite in WTC. John & Michael Cappelletti- starting demolition co in Southern Cal, expect blg implosions in SW US & No Cal which will lead to the cousins. Ann runs the Internet propaganda posters.
074August 1 year ago
my god i cant fuckin believe history channel would do that. i love the history channel even with their stupid alien hunters show but if they run this im done. theres also i bigger thing im noticing, i feel the right wing feels a need to sorta fill a void, where the democrats there modern day patron saint in JFK the GOP has none. so theyve been going around trying to make reagan theres. even tho his record is terrible they're just making it up as they go along like always.
pat442389 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I just love shitting on the Kennedys, almost as much as I love watching leftists like Greenwald freak out over it. Nobody gives a shit what you think, Greenwald, and Surnow has no need to pay any attention to you. As for mischaracterizations of politicians, where were you on the Reagan or Bush docudramas?
glennd7962 1 year ago
What I really wish is that someone would do a documentary on Ted Kennedy. His own family doesn't even try to deny his 50+ plus years of drunken lechery. Only a fucking democrat liberal could be politically viable after causing the the death of a young woman in a drunken accident. Anyone who doesn't denounce Ted Kennedy is a piece of shit, so if crapping on his brother helps out, fine. Btw, he escalated Vietnam from 900 to 16,000 "advisors", and his weakness on Cuba invited the missile crisis.
glennd7962 1 year ago
@glennd7962 Fuck off you sad loser, go get a teabagging you halfwit sulking child.
nilbud 1 year ago
No Tea Partier here - I hold them only in slightly higher regard than you, and that's saying something cuz I really hate slobbering liberal lapdogs, and if you're getting worked up about this, you are a lapdog of the left. Fyi, notice that you don't try and refute the facts I cite. Ted Kennedy was a drunken, lecherous killer and he deserves to be remembered as such. What if Mary Jo Kopechne - the woman he left to die - was your daughter? And JFK greatly escalated Vietnam, and was weak.
glennd7962 1 year ago
Facts? Surely you mean opinions!
>Ted Kennedy was a drunken, lecherous killer
Killer? No, that is your opinion and not only libelous but most likely very wrong.
Drunken... partially... hi did enjoy the drink in his earlier days... just like George W. Bush enjoy the drink and drugs early on!
Careful about throwing stones!
sssdeecee 1 year ago 3
I'll cite one fact that is indisputable. According to Ted's own account of that evening, within 10 mins walk of the site where Ted drove the car off the bridge was a house with a phone that he walked by. If he had called emergency services, and the rescue diver on duty that night publicly stated that he could have been onsite, in the water within 20 mins of that call. His assessment of the crime scene was that Mary Jo Kopechne survived under water for quite some time, as did the autopsy.
glennd7962 1 year ago
His failure to make that call, aside from the fact that he was in a single car accident after eyewitnesses claimed he had been drinking at the party actually add up to at least vehicular manslaughter - hence my calling him a killer. As for being a drunk, he was legendary, if you don't know this, you don't know anything. His family didn't deny it and in his own words he talked uphemistically 'settling' down after marrying his last wife - at the age of 60. He was a pig, lech, drunk and killer.
glennd7962 1 year ago
I'm not defending Bush, you idiot. How you can not see what a complete scumbag Ted Kennedy was is a sad statement about who you are and how you've let politics infect your brain so much that you can't even see right from wrong anymore. Read a book about Chappaquidick before you run your mouth, the facts and public statements are devastating. I have been given first hand reports of his wild drinking episodes during his presidential run in '84 - whoring and drinking, recklessly.
glennd7962 1 year ago
It is inappropriate and inaccurate to demonized Ted Kennedy. While he DID act inappropriately at Chappaqudick he is NOT purposefully responsible for Mary Jo's death. It was an ACCIDENT. He was also a valued Senatorial leader who championed many useful, beneficial legislation. He DID have a drinking problem but does NOT deserve your biased smearing.
exenrontexas 1 year ago
Why would the History Channel jeopardize its brand? Are you kidding me? How many bullshit shows do they do about Nostradamas, for one. And thats to say nothing of the insane amount of speculative work they do, like Life After People (granted, a cool show, but NOT HISTORY). The channel isn't really worth its name anymore half the time, even during its enjoyable programs.
gldni17 1 year ago 5
@gldni17 : LOL . I was just about to say the same thing, but you beat me to it :)
55ella2007k 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Taliban must be destroyed in Afghanistan AT ALL COSTS. Even if it takes 30 years.
The consequences of allowing them to re group is too great for the tiny mind of Greenwald to understand.
Sparkanoid1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Th Taliban and Al Qaeda LOVE people like Greenwald, because they know they just have to play a waiting game and people like greenwald will stir up public discontent for the wa, then the USA has to obey public outrage, then the Taliban wins.
THAT CANNOT HAPPEN THIS TIME GREENWALD YOU IDIOT!
Sparkanoid1 1 year ago
They live (1988)
Sobanski87 1 year ago
I'm a liberal. But why do other liberals so fervently defend the Kennedy administration? He did some good things, and sure, he was an inspirational figure. Also, he killed tens -- if not hundreds -- of thousands of Americans and Vietnamese. He also tried to invade Cuba, which would have led to thousands upon thousands of more deaths if he had succeeded. This is not the kind of leader liberals should be idolizing.
wnnw98 1 year ago
@wnnw98 How old are you? What do you know of the era? What do you know of the political climate?
MirrorMatterMatt 1 year ago
These questions are irrelevant. One does not have to have lived during the Civil War in order to know about it. The fact of the matter is Kennedy killed many thousands of Americans, Vietnamese, and Cubans yet is still idolized by the left as some sort of hero. I understand the emotional ramifications of his assassination, and perhaps if he had finished out his term(s) he would have lived up to some liberal ideals. But he didn't.
wnnw98 1 year ago
@wnnw98: Look, I don't want to get into a pissing match with you, but you insist on interpreting historical events without understanding the period in which the events occurred. You obviously no nothing about the post-War era, which is why you prattle about 'liberal ideals' and so on.
MirrorMatterMatt 1 year ago
I think that you do want to get into a "pissing match." Or else you wouldn't be trying to insult my intelligence.
Using the Cold War as an excuse for Kennedy's actions is not a proper argument for someone viewed as a liberal icon. In that regards, what separates him from Bush using the War on Terror to carry out an imperialistic foreign policy?
wnnw98 1 year ago
@wnnw98 You're a fucking retard.
nilbud 1 year ago
@wnnw98
JFK actually wanted to get out of VIetnam. Eisenhower started that mess. Johnson made it worse. Nixon expanded it. Congress stopped it because John Lennon lead a revolution against it.
captcrais101 1 year ago
Kennedy started it and Nixon finished it.
D0g63rt 1 year ago
Kennedy tried to end it but that is one of the reasons why he was killed. Nixon extended it to China. The people, led by John Lennon, made congress end it.
What you have is the right wing point of view of the vietnam war.
biguy617 1 year ago
I'm aware that its right, thank you for clarifying. Nixon had no war with China, you might be thinking of Cambodia. In fact he was the reason for the detente with China and Russia, going to China doesn't mean going to war with China.
D0g63rt 1 year ago
my mistake. Cambodia
biguy617 1 year ago
Actually, DDE signed us up for that mess. Kennedy acted on the already in place treaty/agreement.
MrTearsintherain 1 year ago 2
Yeah. JFK wanted out of Vietnam like Obama wants out of Iraq and Afghanistan.
How many more people have to die before these "liberal" presidents grow some balls?
wnnw98 1 year ago
I never said Obama was a liberal. I agree his is not a liberal. He is no better than Bush. Kennedy was a liberal. It was Einhowser that was the first to send troops into Vietnam. JFK was killed because he wanted to get out of vietnam and make the CIA only deal with intelligence matters. He was a real populist. Everyone else after him was controlled by the true corporate owners of America.
captcrais101 1 year ago 2
Maybe liberals with balls is like gentle terrorist. Or there's always moral capitalist... just off the top of my head.
imstillwalking 1 year ago
This is not the first 'great' civilization to erase/change history by way of arrogant propaganda for plolitical gain; why stop now. :o/ It is only a short sprint away before the kiddies history books start to read like a Glenn Beck/ Limbaugh primers. "It's a cor-por-ate country after all..."
enigma53545 1 year ago 3
Fantasy History channel. I stopped watching it long ago. How many times can you watch The History of the Gun and every foot of film footage of WWII. Another corporate propaganda outlet. I'm so tired of the hackneyed war stuff...America living on past military laurels while invading innocent countries to steal their oil.
agitcam 1 year ago 4
Yes, lets keep deifying our presidents. The president already has more power than many kings had over their subjects. We are mere serfs. Just look at the plundering our royalty engaged in with the recent corporate welfare to the banks, auto industry and the unions.
And now they want to pass a health care bill that will give the insurance companies 30 million new customers.
The govt is a criminal enterprise, the smaller and less powerful we can make it the better off we will all be.
limitedgovt999 1 year ago
@limitedgov...
Remember: "YOU" are 'the government.' Saying you want less government is like saying you want less control of what happens in your country. "YOU" elect people to manage it and to do the things "YOU" want it to do. If you don't like what it's doing, it's up to "YOU" to change it, not destroy it. Even if it means forcibly removing them from office. If they have too much 'control' over you, it's because "YOU" gave it to them by doing nothing. You're paying them to do what YOU want.
enigma53545 1 year ago
This is a very naive view of how our system actually works. To think that politicians will not act in their self interest goes against all of history
The govt is a criminal enterprise used by various groups to enrich themselves and the politicians that help them. Most regulations are created for the benefit of corporations to create a financial and legal burden for competitors.
The Federal govt is the judge of its own powers, there is no longer any restraint on the powers of the federal govt.
limitedgovt999 1 year ago
It is not naive. It's the way it was designed to operate. Are you saying the government elects itself? The way the "system actually works" is because the 'american people' didn't do anything about anything for the past 20 or so years. Is it not this government...'By the people'? Doesn't that mean anything? If the people want their power (government) back they must get off the duff (e.g.,Europe). That is their responsibility. What's naive is to sit back and expect the gov to police themselves.
enigma53545 1 year ago 2
yes. i'm saying the government elects itself.
xoxox
skinnychef
skinnychef 1 year ago
The system no longer operates as it was designed. It was designed such that the states delegated a few powers to the federal govt with the states remaining the sovereign entities. Good old Abe screwed up this system of states' rights when he caused the death of over 600,000 Americans.
We now have a non-functioning republic and a tyrannical federal govt with unchecked powers. And, we have transformed into a democracy where 51% of the population can plunder the minority.
limitedgovt999 1 year ago
Wow, the capitalization, quotation marks and repetition add so much to your insipid argument - not. Basic rights theory, visualized with entity modeling will demonstrate that 'you' aren't the government. There is a 'you' that interacts with the government but it is a distinct and separate entity. You watch way to much Maddow, enigma, it's turning your brain into mush.
glennd7962 1 year ago
Speaking of brain mush you may want to read Manufacturing Consent and take a look at how this Constitutional Republic was designed to operate, and how it continues to operate today.
D0g63rt 1 year ago
Duped the History Channel? Tarnish their brand? The History Channel did respectable history programs just long enough to establish a reputation which it has sold to the highest bidder ever since. History Channel is nothing but a 24 hour infomercial.
klard 1 year ago
Ahhh JFK - the last TRUE president of the US. If only he had managed to abolish the federal reserve as he intended...
MaTtRoSiTy 1 year ago
I don't really get how the History channel even has credibility anymore when half their crap is cultist brainwashing.
ZKoftherebellion 1 year ago
ok then, the people that care about the truth are going to know its bs...the ones that watch fox news will not...and they will spout quotes from the movie all over youtube and teaparty conventions. Well have a more polarized country as a result and Sarah Palin is going to sell more books.
I guess you could say im getting used to this lol
restlys 1 year ago 2
i hope it never gets filmed and they just completely throw it in the trash where it belongs ha bisky upload
kazooga1234 1 year ago
BFD
jbombsmoker 1 year ago
second
bobsters34 1 year ago
First.
jackmiller954 1 year ago