Universal doesn't want anyone to see how ridiculous this movie is, in the hopes some people will buy the DVD to find out. Let me save you precious time & money 'It is SHIT!'. There's no need to thank me.
You know, my biggest ptoblem with this movie is not about general production, I admitt even with pretended fear of non existing CGI monsters, It was pretty scary and shit was that some kind of creepy stuff going on in there...
My problem is... that in EVERY SECOND FUCKING HORROR MOVIE nowdays there must be two most unlikable characters that are destined to survive and you know who they are from very begining... it's always some stupid bitch and her potential love interrest.
@nalrashido yep exactly. The part that freaked me out in the movie is, You could be The Thing and not know it until it starts ripping thru your body. IT absorbs all your cells and then mimics them so everything will seem normal. It then just hides inside the host until it wants to show itself.
It was shit if you compared it to the original, viewed on it's own this movie was not bad, just an average movie, which is why it's so hated, the John Carpenter remake was so good, that this movie would be judged against it and doesn't hold up. When you take this for what it is it's just an alright movie, I enjoyed going with my girl to see it
the movie rules,...its a fantastic effort in not changing the conception of the carpenter´s one......and the effects are practical in substantives parts,...dont fuck around with the cgi some of you looks a little obsessive ,....the plot was delicate and thrilling....they could fucked for real as Lucas´ve done with indy in indy 4
Why didn't the thing absorb her as a human, like how it did with Garry in the 1982 movie, instead it was doing a pointless transformation. It seems that they made the thing stupid in the prequel. I know there will be "it was its first contact with humans" etc. That doesn't solve anything. It absorbed aliens in the spaceship that were much smarter than humans probably, plus the thing is not stupid. The only explanation is that Kate is main character so she has to survive XD
i think you should be worried whatever gets you off i guess. i was whith you during your comments but along the way i started to worry about you to answer you question no this did not happen to me .one you more likely pulling my leg with others here on youtube or your series hope this does not comeback to hit me in the face but if it does oh well.like the nick name you got nice.
I agree with the top comment. The Thing (1982) and the Thing (2011) are two different movies. It's not possible to compare the two without sounding like a dumb ass. This one is the prequel leading up to the Thing (1982) not a remake, so stop treating it as such and appreciate the damn movie for what is. /rant
@diegoelopez I think that being a prequel is what hurts the film.
If it were a remake it would be more detached from the '82 film. As a prequel, you'd have to compare it to the Carpenter film since it ties directly into it. The creature is inconsistent, there's a giant plot hole involving the alien crash site, then there's the whole thing with the Russian base that was never mentioned in the original, I could go on.
It's a decent film on it's own, but it's pretty terrible as a prequel.
Gentlemen, let's not squabble over the trivial question of whether this movie sucked or not! We should instead be discussing much more important matters, like the fact that this scene gave me an erection. Did this happen to anyone else or should I be worried?
Carpenters version is still the best. The 1st movie (with James Arness as the monster) was OK but just an average flick. This version is just too much a copy, made into a slasher film. I miss the "thingisms" - "I don't know what it is but it's pissed off". Palmer turning, pointing and saying "You gotta be fucking kidding". Gary saying "I'd rather not spend the rest of the winter TIED TO THIS FUCKING COUCH". These made the movie a classic.
Why all the hate ? I'm a BIG FAN of the Carpenter classic although this one isn't as good it comes pretty damm close good cast good direction and is a great prequel people just love to hate and think in black and white either they love it or just say it's awful over all love both films and own them great horror films and I can see that at least to me this one will be a classic at least in my eye better then remakes and torture shit that comes out evey year this had a story and loved it
The first movie wasn't about monsters chasing and killing others. It was the suspense: you never knew who was the thing and who wasn't. Hell, even YOU could be contaminated. This "prequel" has turned an amazing book and an amazing film into any other slasher. Pathetic.
Not exactly. It shows that the Thing has learned from between the movies. Think about it, it doesn't know enough about humans and that it basically assimilates others in broad daylight, not expecting any resistance. Over the course of the film it LEARNS. Now jump to carpenter's film, what do we see? A monster coming out only when it's exposed and or hidden. All in all, the creature's behavior makes sense.
@Animeman2008 Nah, I think they made the thing stupid in the prequel. Thing absorbed aliens that were much smarter than humans. It was probably stealthy there and only attacked when it was needed. The creature's behavior doesn't makes sense.
no.. this movie truly fucking sucks! even if you only watch the transformation sequences youll know that this is truly a terrible movie! if you wanna see a real movie with the exact same plot.. watch john carpenters the thing.. cause this movie isnt worth anyones time! seriously shitty
the monster doesn't have the kind of gravity that it did in ther Carpenter version. Its like all the stuff they had to do to make it look right, darker lighting, clever editing etc, made it seem way more dangerous. making it run around so freely with CGI makes it silly looking.
@HDGodStyle i agree now that i've watched the thing then played dead space 1 & 2 again yeah i think dead space was inspired by the things the two match up togethor perfectly.
from one thing i have gained from watching so many horror movies and having all my time to think to myself, if i were in the room, while everyone is shocked that there was blood in the shower,
i'd notice juliette not being as afraid and think:
"somethings wrong with her.... i'd better not stick too close around her."
1:21 - 1:41 Could you turn around any slower? I don't know about anyone else, but if I heard those weird cracking and growling sounds, I'd start looking everywhere to see where they were coming from.
@millionman4 The alien disguises itself as a human and if someone should somehow find out its true form, then it'll mutate and attempt to kill them in any way possible. Basically... That was never Juliette, just the alien pretending to be her until it could be alone with the other girl.
@millionman4 It's hard to explain, but I'm guessing a small particle may have infected her and taken over her completely. If you look at the John Carpenter's The Thing, it happens the same way. So you never know who's human or who's the thing.
This thing kills its prey and then proceeds to assimilate it, in other words, it creates another thing with the form of that prey. One of the things killed this woman and created another thing with her form. That's what creates the suspense in this movie: if the thing uses the form of their preys and acquires their knowledge, we don't know who is a thing and who is a human...
I haven't seen the movie yet, but at least a couple of the scenes I've seen--the flamethrower that breaks down at the worst possible moment and the guy with the working flamethrower who just stands and gawks in disbelieving shock and horror while the hero(ine) yells at him to "burn it!"--seem blatant ripoffs of the original (remember the blood test scene in which MacReady's flamethrower won't work and Windows is too horrified at Palmer's transformation to use his?)
Remember the thing from the original one. it was smart, didn't reveal itself pointlessly and did stealth kills. This one just goes on a rampage immediately. It's not the same monster.
"This being can assimilate it's victims, deceptively changing itself into one of us. Oh, but, she's a woman too, and she's scared like me, so, I can trust her and turn my back to her!"
What a fuckin' retard. Gather everyone together, check 'em all out, then decide who you can and can't trust; 'til then, I wouldn't take a pinch for anyone. But for plot convenience, someone would flee anyway, forcing them to go on a wild goose chase while someone else dies or turns.
Of course this movie used CGI!! If they used the same effects at the 1982 version then the creatures would of looked just plain silly! And the cgi is decent! You know you've seen worse than this!!!
@metalmaster88 Dude u can think what u wan't but if u think that good 4 u no one but 6 other people thumbs up your comment ooooo big deal just keep your opines to your self DOUCH
@BachikoiBabi They used " amazing puppets/robotics " in this movie, the first cut of the movie have puppets ! But Universal said " Ok ! It's good ! Now let's re-shot everything with CGI for no good reason :D ! " so now we have CGI :/ There's a petition for the practical cut .
@1991Hatcher You got the facts wrong. They didn't "polished" them with cgi. Universal demanded cgi, so all that hard work with amazing puppets was useless. They just put cgi over that and all you see is crappy cgi in the finished film.
@BachikoiBabi This movie originally had animatronics, but the studio thought the puppets didn't look scary enough and were too slow so they had them redo everything with CGI.Youtube The Thing 2011/ Creatures by ADI to find the video showing the original animatronics and them filming with the robotics.
Kind of felt bad about Juliette since she seemed the most innocent of the group, but you knew she was going to become it, or get killed by it as from the get-go you kind of knew who the survivors were going to be. Kate because she was the main character (I know there isn't confirmation about her living, but she didn't die from the monster itself), and Lars as he didn't speak English and they helicopter gunman from the 82 one didn't (But was obviously a member of the base team).
i was watching the movie but i didn't get how SHE got infected? i don't remeber her coming near it to begin with could someone clear up this confusion for me?
I got no idea, it must of been split in two parts or something, because shortly before it was on the helicopter that crashed (Which was nowhere near the base), and the pilots didn't return until much later in the movie.
I concur, it's probably because the thing they are filming is actually there, and not CGed in after the filming. Although with the CGI they were able to make the monster while still keeping the victims facial expressions which was kind of creepy (See 2:44). But when it comes to the monsters themselves, I always thought puppets were better then the CGI (Although in some cases, like the T-1000 in Terminator 2, it *needs* to be CGI).
The one problem I had with this movie was that the creatures weren't disgusting enough. One of the reasons why I liked the original film was that the creature were terrifying and disgusting (meaning how they looked, moved, and interacted).
@wcw2793 the only creature that I thought looked halfway decent was the "splitface" creature, where they showed an up close look at it but they made it look like shit when they used CGI on the hair.
In a horror movie I now realize you kind of have to put yourself in that situation like a girl turning into a monster you running around and burning it that is not scary but if you were that person Hell Ya It Would!!!
i love how that random beard guy just comes out of nowhere with a fucking flamethrower. no one called for him, he just sort of shows up... with a flamethrower...
That hand held shaky camera thing stopped being clever 14 frames after the first time it was used. If someone is holding the camera, they're not going to capture edits from 4000 different angles.
OK, I'll take grenades as well. And maybe some toothpaste (if I do morph into the Thing during the course of my stay, I'll still need to practice good dental hygiene).
@DrewPicklesTheDark "I know I would need it if I was alone and saw someone I knew transform in to that and try to kill me impaling someone else I knew in the process."
Happens to me aaaaall the time. It's losing its terror factor: now I just find it plain irritating.
One thing that disappointed me about this rendition of The Thing. The movie used way too many of the "Circular gaping orifice mouth with lots of teeth and tentacles coming out". The used it with this one, a little with the dude on the chopper, and the last Thing on the spaceship. Kind of lame compared to the stuff in the original.
@DathanielTDK I agree, in the original all the tranformations were unique and creepy in their own way. In this one it was almost always a mouth-stomach thing. Combine that with crappy CGI and it's pretty lame. I wish John Carpenter would come back to make a real sequel.
Universal doesn't want anyone to see how ridiculous this movie is, in the hopes some people will buy the DVD to find out. Let me save you precious time & money 'It is SHIT!'. There's no need to thank me.
Vaultboy101 3 days ago
This movie makes no sense whats so ever.
TheBeatlesFan86 4 days ago
1:41 well theres something you see everyday
omgitsgrim2 4 days ago
for all the morons out there who hate the 2011 thing, dont search up "The Thing 2011" and comment " HURR BLURR DIZ MUVIE SUCKZ"
jj1x0 4 days ago
You know, my biggest ptoblem with this movie is not about general production, I admitt even with pretended fear of non existing CGI monsters, It was pretty scary and shit was that some kind of creepy stuff going on in there...
My problem is... that in EVERY SECOND FUCKING HORROR MOVIE nowdays there must be two most unlikable characters that are destined to survive and you know who they are from very begining... it's always some stupid bitch and her potential love interrest.
YuriPRIMEpoland 4 days ago
@YuriPRIMEpoland fuck you man that womens hot
TimeisTruth333 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEVER FEAR!
LARS IS HERE!
TheTannerzilla 5 days ago
Its really creepy when it looks at you after its transformed. It has no emoton and it freaks me out. D:
AfterAttackTV 5 days ago
RUN! IT'S DEAD SPACE PACK MAN!
MrThatguyuknow 5 days ago
So the Thing uses other celluar structures for it to evolve?
nalrashido 5 days ago
@nalrashido Yeah basically I think
diehardx243 5 days ago
@nalrashido yep exactly. The part that freaked me out in the movie is, You could be The Thing and not know it until it starts ripping thru your body. IT absorbs all your cells and then mimics them so everything will seem normal. It then just hides inside the host until it wants to show itself.
doccaremel 4 days ago
It was shit if you compared it to the original, viewed on it's own this movie was not bad, just an average movie, which is why it's so hated, the John Carpenter remake was so good, that this movie would be judged against it and doesn't hold up. When you take this for what it is it's just an alright movie, I enjoyed going with my girl to see it
davidmumma66 5 days ago
@davidmumma66 That's exactly what I think dude.
diehardx243 5 days ago
this is a one fucked up necromorph but one question HOW DID IT GET HERE?!
Turk343 5 days ago
It would be a cool idea for a mob in dead space 3
WMMprojects 5 days ago
and now i'm waiting for the official movie of dead space
tunch90 5 days ago
Wow the first female to be infected...
El1t3HUNT3R13 5 days ago
thats funny because my ex-girlfriend used to behave the same way when she got angry and the only thing that could stop her was a flamethrower
GlobalParasit 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tired of these closed minded people raping this movie. NOSTALGIA WHORES need to open their minds.
TheGammaRayBurst 6 days ago
Me in the theater when I first saw this:
Ahhhhhh shit...
Remousamavi 6 days ago
I would still fuck her; especially the way she looks at me at 2:44.
JackieRogerJr 6 days ago
@JackieRogerJr true true she looks like she wants it yo
iiAMGr3ATN3Zz 5 days ago
Even in the original movie I wondered why the hell they had a flamethrower at an Arctic research lab. Guess they had to keep warm somehow.
lakobause 6 days ago
well....its not crappy....but people always want the same "thing"...jajaja get it?
*SHUT UP FOOL!! .... :'(
TheKevin1980 6 days ago
dammit Romona flowers!
Gesicht2Gesicht 6 days ago
what the fuck is it doing to the dead body?
DSkehan2004 6 days ago
@DSkehan2004 Assimilating it and making it into another thing. There's a deleted scene where you see Lars torch it after Juliette is toast.
boettcherownzu 6 days ago
burn baby burn
dragonsteef 6 days ago
the movie rules,...its a fantastic effort in not changing the conception of the carpenter´s one......and the effects are practical in substantives parts,...dont fuck around with the cgi some of you looks a little obsessive ,....the plot was delicate and thrilling....they could fucked for real as Lucas´ve done with indy in indy 4
neofit0 6 days ago
@PaintingWithNotes FUCKING WATCH THE MOVIE, MOST OF THE MOVIE IS SUSPENSE IT'S JUST BECAUSE THIS GUY IS SHOWING THE ACTION PARTS SO GTFO!
NationKiwi 6 days ago
Dead Space also used The Thing creatures as references for the Necromorph creatures.
derekgoyenechea414 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why didn't the thing absorb her as a human, like how it did with Garry in the 1982 movie, instead it was doing a pointless transformation. It seems that they made the thing stupid in the prequel. I know there will be "it was its first contact with humans" etc. That doesn't solve anything. It absorbed aliens in the spaceship that were much smarter than humans probably, plus the thing is not stupid. The only explanation is that Kate is main character so she has to survive XD
Simpleman925 1 week ago 2
dead space 3 who knows?
washu12 1 week ago
better story the main hero survies or becomes the thing just my thoughts on the subject.
washu12 1 week ago
when i first saw her turn into the thing to things happend 1 holy crap 2nd resident evil 2.
washu12 1 week ago
i think you should be worried whatever gets you off i guess. i was whith you during your comments but along the way i started to worry about you to answer you question no this did not happen to me .one you more likely pulling my leg with others here on youtube or your series hope this does not comeback to hit me in the face but if it does oh well.like the nick name you got nice.
washu12 1 week ago
I agree with the top comment. The Thing (1982) and the Thing (2011) are two different movies. It's not possible to compare the two without sounding like a dumb ass. This one is the prequel leading up to the Thing (1982) not a remake, so stop treating it as such and appreciate the damn movie for what is. /rant
diegoelopez 1 week ago
@diegoelopez I think that being a prequel is what hurts the film.
If it were a remake it would be more detached from the '82 film. As a prequel, you'd have to compare it to the Carpenter film since it ties directly into it. The creature is inconsistent, there's a giant plot hole involving the alien crash site, then there's the whole thing with the Russian base that was never mentioned in the original, I could go on.
It's a decent film on it's own, but it's pretty terrible as a prequel.
NULLcHiLD2 6 days ago
Gentlemen, let's not squabble over the trivial question of whether this movie sucked or not! We should instead be discussing much more important matters, like the fact that this scene gave me an erection. Did this happen to anyone else or should I be worried?
DefineAGod 1 week ago
oh its julie-HOLY SHIT, KILL IT!! KILL IT WITH FIRE!!
crazyenergy98 1 week ago
Why is the camera shaking, it is making me nauseous
And why are they staring at each other while talking
VicariousReality7 1 week ago
not good without Kurt Russel
4tom2u 1 week ago
Carpenters version is still the best. The 1st movie (with James Arness as the monster) was OK but just an average flick. This version is just too much a copy, made into a slasher film. I miss the "thingisms" - "I don't know what it is but it's pissed off". Palmer turning, pointing and saying "You gotta be fucking kidding". Gary saying "I'd rather not spend the rest of the winter TIED TO THIS FUCKING COUCH". These made the movie a classic.
xxxtommi2 1 week ago
Why all the hate ? I'm a BIG FAN of the Carpenter classic although this one isn't as good it comes pretty damm close good cast good direction and is a great prequel people just love to hate and think in black and white either they love it or just say it's awful over all love both films and own them great horror films and I can see that at least to me this one will be a classic at least in my eye better then remakes and torture shit that comes out evey year this had a story and loved it
QAndJMovies2 1 week ago
i wouldve been laughing my ass off in the theatre if the whole movie was like this XD HAHAHAHAHAHA
Condemnedya 1 week ago
1:22 THUMBS UP IF U KNEW WHAT WAS BEHIND HER
eddyshitofoko 1 week ago
Dude! Torch it now! Just staring at it ain't gonna stop it.
falcon815q 1 week ago
Lady! Turn around faster! Turning slowly ain't gonna make it go away.
falcon815q 1 week ago
The first movie wasn't about monsters chasing and killing others. It was the suspense: you never knew who was the thing and who wasn't. Hell, even YOU could be contaminated. This "prequel" has turned an amazing book and an amazing film into any other slasher. Pathetic.
PaintingWithNotes 1 week ago
@PaintingWithNotes when's your movie come out? oh it doesn't? FUCK YOU
geddoe316 1 week ago
@PaintingWithNotes
Not exactly. It shows that the Thing has learned from between the movies. Think about it, it doesn't know enough about humans and that it basically assimilates others in broad daylight, not expecting any resistance. Over the course of the film it LEARNS. Now jump to carpenter's film, what do we see? A monster coming out only when it's exposed and or hidden. All in all, the creature's behavior makes sense.
Animeman2008 6 days ago
@Animeman2008 Nah, I think they made the thing stupid in the prequel. Thing absorbed aliens that were much smarter than humans. It was probably stealthy there and only attacked when it was needed. The creature's behavior doesn't makes sense.
Simpleman925 6 days ago 3
no.. this movie truly fucking sucks! even if you only watch the transformation sequences youll know that this is truly a terrible movie! if you wanna see a real movie with the exact same plot.. watch john carpenters the thing.. cause this movie isnt worth anyones time! seriously shitty
metalmaster88 1 week ago
the monster doesn't have the kind of gravity that it did in ther Carpenter version. Its like all the stuff they had to do to make it look right, darker lighting, clever editing etc, made it seem way more dangerous. making it run around so freely with CGI makes it silly looking.
NotNamedJones 1 week ago
the transformation looks like dead space
Shun6237 1 week ago 21
@Shun6237 You beat me to it. I was going to say the same thing.
Brownstone2004 5 days ago
@Shun6237 I personally think that the original was the inspiration fot dead space
UMVC3sucks 5 days ago
@Shun6237 I think dead space was actually inspired by The Thing once you think about it after awhile.
HDGodStyle 5 days ago
@HDGodStyle i agree now that i've watched the thing then played dead space 1 & 2 again yeah i think dead space was inspired by the things the two match up togethor perfectly.
drogon223 4 days ago
she becomes like th flood from halo but nobody has a gun DANG! if only somone had a shotgun......
Thelegofreak19 1 week ago
I wish the thing crash landed on a planet of robots. yeah that nigga would be fucked then!
bestfighteralive 1 week ago
This The thing kills the stupid original The thing. CGI kills the fake shit robotics lmao
CreatedOnly4U 1 week ago 2
@CreatedOnly4U The fuck it does.
TyRiders2 1 week ago
when someone screams run dont stand there asking why RUN BITCH RUUUUN!!!! HE GONE KILL YOU!!! (B-rad voice)
YoungFlySwaggArtist 1 week ago
from one thing i have gained from watching so many horror movies and having all my time to think to myself, if i were in the room, while everyone is shocked that there was blood in the shower,
i'd notice juliette not being as afraid and think:
"somethings wrong with her.... i'd better not stick too close around her."
iamnanosec 1 week ago
CGI is awesome
AAlonzo96 1 week ago
If you don't like the movie than fuck off and dont watch it, dont type in "The Thing 2011" and say "HURR DURR THIZ MUVIE SUCKED"
lolidestroyallofu 1 week ago 22
@lolidestroyallofu yup :)
TheMatthewick 1 week ago in playlist the thing is back man! :D
@lolidestroyallofu the movie didnt suck at all I think, the animations are perfect but it was kinda disgusting wont agree?
PunkMothaFuckaz 1 week ago
@lolidestroyallofu compared to the original it kinda did.
CrackedStyle 1 week ago
@lolidestroyallofu well it did suck, what else are we supposed to say?
RoninWestern 1 week ago
@lolidestroyallofu ikr
jj1x0 6 days ago
@lolidestroyallofu yes I do, this movie sucks
OCNVN 5 days ago
why didnt it just eat him?
DRAGLORD11 1 week ago
1:21 - 1:41 Could you turn around any slower? I don't know about anyone else, but if I heard those weird cracking and growling sounds, I'd start looking everywhere to see where they were coming from.
TheUnseenMovieLover 1 week ago
idk
35123killer 1 week ago
What happened to it only attacking at night?
toxic2waste 1 week ago
can someone explain me how do they become this parasite/thing out of nowhere?
millionman4 1 week ago
@millionman4 The alien disguises itself as a human and if someone should somehow find out its true form, then it'll mutate and attempt to kill them in any way possible. Basically... That was never Juliette, just the alien pretending to be her until it could be alone with the other girl.
Specterish 1 week ago
@Specterish thank you very much everything seems more clear now
millionman4 1 week ago
@millionman4 It's hard to explain, but I'm guessing a small particle may have infected her and taken over her completely. If you look at the John Carpenter's The Thing, it happens the same way. So you never know who's human or who's the thing.
letshell 1 week ago
This thing kills its prey and then proceeds to assimilate it, in other words, it creates another thing with the form of that prey. One of the things killed this woman and created another thing with her form. That's what creates the suspense in this movie: if the thing uses the form of their preys and acquires their knowledge, we don't know who is a thing and who is a human...
Racaeel1 6 days ago
She like : "RUNNNNNNN!!!!!"
What does he do? He just stands there like an idiot until he's killed. >_>
Eternalsummersong 1 week ago
these guys make necromorphs proud
Aman007836 1 week ago
what ugly cgi
Urmean15 1 week ago
F*CK I'M HAVING NIGHTMARES TONIGHT
captdavid160 1 week ago
@captdavid160: I've seen worse.
Eternalsummersong 1 week ago
I haven't seen the movie yet, but at least a couple of the scenes I've seen--the flamethrower that breaks down at the worst possible moment and the guy with the working flamethrower who just stands and gawks in disbelieving shock and horror while the hero(ine) yells at him to "burn it!"--seem blatant ripoffs of the original (remember the blood test scene in which MacReady's flamethrower won't work and Windows is too horrified at Palmer's transformation to use his?)
Arbeedubya 1 week ago
1:19 for it to start
dontlikepie 1 week ago
beautiful
Vladwell 1 week ago
fuck cgi
YoutubSUCKZ 1 week ago
Remember the thing from the original one. it was smart, didn't reveal itself pointlessly and did stealth kills. This one just goes on a rampage immediately. It's not the same monster.
ikosabre 1 week ago
Necromorphs... Call Isaac.
JinKsed17 1 week ago
That "THING" isnt scary,creepy or realistic looking......Its FUCKING UGLY!
thegrazymiranda 1 week ago
Thing (1982) >>>>>>>>>> Thing (2011)
daTruChosen 1 week ago
This would make a great videogame.
cinemalego 1 week ago
@cinemalego wrong, they already made a video game for the PS2 console and it sucked ass...sorry
butterfly153239 1 week ago
@butterfly153239 I know about it, and I also know it sucks. But it just depends on who makes it, so actually, no one was wrong.
cinemalego 1 week ago
@cinemalego yeah but I don't think they would make another video game
butterfly153239 1 week ago
"This being can assimilate it's victims, deceptively changing itself into one of us. Oh, but, she's a woman too, and she's scared like me, so, I can trust her and turn my back to her!"
What a fuckin' retard. Gather everyone together, check 'em all out, then decide who you can and can't trust; 'til then, I wouldn't take a pinch for anyone. But for plot convenience, someone would flee anyway, forcing them to go on a wild goose chase while someone else dies or turns.
VergilsRespite 1 week ago
@VergilsRespite Or the damn flamethrower would break.
VergilsRespite 1 week ago
Of course this movie used CGI!! If they used the same effects at the 1982 version then the creatures would of looked just plain silly! And the cgi is decent! You know you've seen worse than this!!!
XtreemeGamer 1 week ago
@XtreemeGamer Also, the high res cameras would have shown any mistake or imperfections of the models/robots
NonstopRam 1 week ago
2:00 remenber always run when someone says RUN!!!!
danteODST 1 week ago
You don't see this on David Attenborough
samszeman 1 week ago
flame-throwers are litterally the best thing ever
thepwningeggnog 1 week ago
thumbs up
TheThingInvader 1 week ago
this movie is awful
metalmaster88 1 week ago 7
@metalmaster88 Dude u can think what u wan't but if u think that good 4 u no one but 6 other people thumbs up your comment ooooo big deal just keep your opines to your self DOUCH
nix10kodeey 1 week ago
True fact- If that really happened, and it was real she would have never made it out that room =/
UkeIchi3 1 week ago in playlist Awaken Demons
The original used amazing puppets/robotics, this one just uses cheap CGI.
BachikoiBabi 1 week ago 19
@BachikoiBabi They used " amazing puppets/robotics " in this movie, the first cut of the movie have puppets ! But Universal said " Ok ! It's good ! Now let's re-shot everything with CGI for no good reason :D ! " so now we have CGI :/ There's a petition for the practical cut .
Scratshouille 1 week ago
@BachikoiBabi and way too much of it
butterfly153239 1 week ago
@BachikoiBabi actually they used robotics for the movie but not the whole time
crazy8adventures2 1 week ago
@BachikoiBabi It's the story that counts bro, look at The Evil Dead!
TheDubandTrance 1 week ago
@BachikoiBabi Actually they used animitronics and puppets and then polished it up with cgi in this one.
1991Hatcher 1 week ago
@1991Hatcher You got the facts wrong. They didn't "polished" them with cgi. Universal demanded cgi, so all that hard work with amazing puppets was useless. They just put cgi over that and all you see is crappy cgi in the finished film.
Simpleman925 1 week ago
@BachikoiBabi YOUR CHEAP CGI, The original's effects were bullshit.
codafett 1 week ago
@BachikoiBabi It uses a mix of both.
Rhymebook13 1 week ago
@BachikoiBabi This movie originally had animatronics, but the studio thought the puppets didn't look scary enough and were too slow so they had them redo everything with CGI.Youtube The Thing 2011/ Creatures by ADI to find the video showing the original animatronics and them filming with the robotics.
TheMiniShottty931 1 week ago
Kind of felt bad about Juliette since she seemed the most innocent of the group, but you knew she was going to become it, or get killed by it as from the get-go you kind of knew who the survivors were going to be. Kate because she was the main character (I know there isn't confirmation about her living, but she didn't die from the monster itself), and Lars as he didn't speak English and they helicopter gunman from the 82 one didn't (But was obviously a member of the base team).
DrewPicklesTheDark 1 week ago
standing there and watching ALWAYS works right??
MrBlooCola 1 week ago
@MrBlooCola yes,yes it is
khoi009 1 week ago
Reminds me of halo flood
beachbum111111 1 week ago
run bitch run!!!
eman12340 1 week ago
i was watching the movie but i didn't get how SHE got infected? i don't remeber her coming near it to begin with could someone clear up this confusion for me?
bimseal 1 week ago
@bimseal agreed
halojokey 1 week ago
@bimseal Griggs followed her to the bathroom
BadWolf117Returns 1 week ago
@BadWolf117Returns
I don't remember that part...
SkywarpMach7 1 week ago
@bimseal
I got no idea, it must of been split in two parts or something, because shortly before it was on the helicopter that crashed (Which was nowhere near the base), and the pilots didn't return until much later in the movie.
DrewPicklesTheDark 1 week ago
the sound that monster shit does when dies reminds me of the Guardians from Dead Space, like some kind of relief
corvusmalo 1 week ago
@corvusmalo You know the creators of Dead Space got the idea for the Necromorph creatures from John Carpenter's 1982 version of The Thing?
butterfly153239 1 week ago
@butterfly153239 yeah, hence my comment xd
corvusmalo 1 week ago
It's the chick that played Ramona Flowers in Scott Pilgrim vs. the World!
Stealthsoldier20 1 week ago
Something about the old style way of representing the thing (the wierd mushy puppets or whatever) seemed way more gruesome
ThreeFrotheFuzzy 1 week ago
@ThreeFrotheFuzzy
I concur, it's probably because the thing they are filming is actually there, and not CGed in after the filming. Although with the CGI they were able to make the monster while still keeping the victims facial expressions which was kind of creepy (See 2:44). But when it comes to the monsters themselves, I always thought puppets were better then the CGI (Although in some cases, like the T-1000 in Terminator 2, it *needs* to be CGI).
DrewPicklesTheDark 1 week ago
@DrewPicklesTheDark I totally agree with you on that.
butterfly153239 1 week ago
@ThreeFrotheFuzzy oh yeah and to me it looked much more realistic too.
butterfly153239 1 week ago
The one problem I had with this movie was that the creatures weren't disgusting enough. One of the reasons why I liked the original film was that the creature were terrifying and disgusting (meaning how they looked, moved, and interacted).
wcw2793 1 week ago
@wcw2793 the only creature that I thought looked halfway decent was the "splitface" creature, where they showed an up close look at it but they made it look like shit when they used CGI on the hair.
butterfly153239 1 week ago
@yeldahA7x Yeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
wcw2793 1 week ago
this is what i go through mentally when i encounter a spider.
chromosome24 2 weeks ago
All I was thinking when I saw this was dead space...
greger2045 2 weeks ago
@greger2045 that would be such a sick sci fi movie.
chromosome24 2 weeks ago
@chromosome24 you said it mate!
greger2045 1 week ago
@chromosome24 ya it would be but I wonder if the just used practical effects instead of cgi I wonder how badass the Necromorphs would look?
butterfly153239 1 week ago
dude. Why is it that in all of these scenes the first thing that comes to my mind is
Some sort of sick porn?
TheMeatLover123 2 weeks ago
@TheMeatLover123 wtf is wrong with u? u need some serious help.
butterfly153239 1 week ago
@butterfly153239 xDD lol im a morbid and sick person but thats really what it looked like at first glance O_O
TheMeatLover123 1 week ago
You can clearly hear a lion roar at 2:57.
valdi9165 2 weeks ago
@valdi9165 Omg.. Its true XD
LeDoyle666 2 weeks ago
In a horror movie I now realize you kind of have to put yourself in that situation like a girl turning into a monster you running around and burning it that is not scary but if you were that person Hell Ya It Would!!!
emoianboy2 2 weeks ago
i love how that random beard guy just comes out of nowhere with a fucking flamethrower. no one called for him, he just sort of shows up... with a flamethrower...
TheSindustriesLtd 2 weeks ago
That hand held shaky camera thing stopped being clever 14 frames after the first time it was used. If someone is holding the camera, they're not going to capture edits from 4000 different angles.
ion010101 2 weeks ago
HAHAhAhAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAH its like an necromorph XD
dragonwing013 2 weeks ago
Things to take on a trip to Antarctica:
* gloves
* beard
* flamethrower
crapatev 2 weeks ago 43
@crapatev Nice try, but they`re smarter than you ;D
They took grenades with them too! The most important thing to survive in Antarctica XD
DieGrenzFrequenz 2 weeks ago
@DieGrenzFrequenz "They took grenades with them too! "
OK, I'll take grenades as well. And maybe some toothpaste (if I do morph into the Thing during the course of my stay, I'll still need to practice good dental hygiene).
crapatev 2 weeks ago
@crapatev and earrings apparently
tornadomaster96 1 week ago
@crapatev
You forgot...
* clean underwear
I know I would need it if I was alone and saw someone I knew transform in to that and try to kill me impaling someone else I knew in the process.
DrewPicklesTheDark 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DrewPicklesTheDark "I know I would need it if I was alone and saw someone I knew transform in to that and try to kill me impaling someone else I knew in the process."
Happens to me aaaaall the time. It's losing its terror factor: now I just find it plain irritating.
crapatev 1 week ago
Don't fear! Lars is hear!
TheElectrobe 2 weeks ago
One thing that disappointed me about this rendition of The Thing. The movie used way too many of the "Circular gaping orifice mouth with lots of teeth and tentacles coming out". The used it with this one, a little with the dude on the chopper, and the last Thing on the spaceship. Kind of lame compared to the stuff in the original.
DathanielTDK 2 weeks ago 2
@DathanielTDK
precisely that's why i say the monsters are cartoonish............basically, you have a big mouth full of teeth chasing people...............
worstalentscout 2 weeks ago
@DathanielTDK I agree, in the original all the tranformations were unique and creepy in their own way. In this one it was almost always a mouth-stomach thing. Combine that with crappy CGI and it's pretty lame. I wish John Carpenter would come back to make a real sequel.
timjones066 2 weeks ago
a necromorph! cut off her limbs
khoi009 2 weeks ago
she parkourd that freaking office
Biceps4evr 2 weeks ago
Well I guess that's
*Puts on glasses*
One less Thing to worry about
yeldahA7x 2 weeks ago
I'd still do her
joesmoe71 2 weeks ago
@joesmoe71 thats sick
liam999100 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
joesmoe71 2 weeks ago
<