Dear Sir. I whould like to know when exactly these moonstructures where observed for the first time. The mounth palamor 250 cm reflector lens could have made very good pictures of the moon from the 1920st. If there was alreaddy convincing evidence in those day's than this information could have triggered organisations as the Amerikan Interplanetary Society 1930, the BIS 1933 the VIR, GRID etc. The BIS attracted many later famous SF writers. Thanks. Mathieu.
wow, pretty bizarre, NAlexo,,, where did you get this? the other lunar shots, if i recall, were more clear and distinct, these are fuzzy. i was a kid when the first guy stepped on the moon. but astronauts can definitly be seen in a couple of frames. if i was an astronaut filming this, i would have to clean out my jockeys when i was done filming.
Why are we only seeing this now? Surely there would have been more stuff said about the existance of a base on the Moon, now who would set that up? Could be evidence of us being monitered years ago (all those old pictures and sculptered Disk shaped objects) though what the hell would have happened to them, and did they come from Mars, or somewhre further.
but dam a good fiction story or truth i got a fuckin headache but man nobody i know off and thats like thousands of normal people dont like trust the gov its a shame that congress in itself has been caught lying and cheating even on frontline and 60 minutes makes these stories somewhat plausible
whatever this is its a good story man either a good science fiction tale or hard core truth wow anyway i have heard that they nuked the evidence on the moon after they excavated and did there research for national security because other countries got space vehicles
Just tell me something, wy the camera is moving like it is floating ot flying or something like that? Astronauts walk jumping in the moon, we saw it, so wy the camera runs so steady? Because it is a fake, maybe. Belive me, I wish to be wrong with all my heart, but is hard to belive this video.
Whoever is opinionated about the smoothness of camera's motion please remember: This is not America's Funniest Videos. These people were trained years for what they did. Moreover do you thnk they had Super 8 in their hands?
Dear sir. The first thing that struck me in this video was the monolith kind of stone in one of the rooms. If this video is real thaall the other apollo flights where pointed to other structures. It would be rediculous to find ruïns of a ancient civilisation in the first flight and than go collecting rocks with the other apollo missions. I remember very well that befor going to the moon, satelites went to the moon to make very well pictures of the surface..1 / 4
The missions that followed did not involve collecting rocks, rather explorations of other sites with remnants (including the obelisc zone). There were over 20,000 photos of them taken before Apollo 11 landing.
So, if there where ruins, or buildings, they had all the information before they determined the landingplaces. Very probable, Stanley Kubrick must have known about it and in his movie 2001 he alreaddy sended the message to the world that they found traces of a old civilisation of 5000000 years as I remember well. And in that movie, we see the monolith. If he and the writer of the book Arthur Clarke knew that nasa discovered ruins on the moon... 2/4
It is a well know fact that Hollywood tests for the public's pulse (War of the Worlds, The Day that Earth Stood Still, E.T., Star Wars, Fire in the Sky, Communion, Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Signs). What matters to the Army is not
they could have based the whole story on this facts. In a way they could have prepaired the whole world alreaddy for these proves of live elswhere in the universe with the in 1971 mind blowing movie 2001, that influenced my artistic work deeply. I hope that you have more video stuff of the other landings. PS. Is it possible that this video is so smooth because they shot probably with more than 24 pictures a second. 3/4
You can see this clearly when the astronaut is traying to collect some rocks and debri at the end. I have the feeling that you see clearly that it is slow motion. I can not wait to see the next video. If this is true, I start to understand why the astronauts, who where my herous in those days, disapeared very soon out of the in the media and lived suddenly a different live. Keep up the good work. Greetings from Belgium. Mathieu. 4/4
I agree. If you were on the moon in a low-gravity environment filming the ruins of an alien civilization, would you hop around like an idiot or take slow, methodical steps to ensure good camerawork.
too bad the moon does not spin as it circles the earth then we would be able to see the dark side of the moon. Sense noone can see it then there is no way to prove it. Another thing if we went all that way to go to the moon to prove us, why did we plant the USA flag on the dark side where noone can see it, you think they would of took the effort to put it on the side to show it to the whole world.
if we can clearly see the side of the moon that faces the earth, why would we explore it? The moon is so bright, and telescopes so strong that we can make out anything. If there is something on the moon, it would be on the dark side.
the moon spins at a rate that is timed so that the side of the moon that you see is always there... in Australia you'd see the opposite side of the moon but you'd only ever see that side.
A habitable moon? Nothing's too crazy for the Conspiracy Theorist. Considering Project Paperclip is real, and NASA technically was run by Nazi's, I don't know what to believe anymore.
NASA was far from being run by Nazis. von Braun and his German team were only involved in booster design and rocketry. NASA itself was run by Americans (ie. James Webb etc).
Absolutely incredible footage! Thank you SO MUCH for posting this. We DID land on the moon, and saw stuff like this- that is why they shot the fake footage- to cover it up. This is the REAL footage. These structures may well be from alien civilizations, but I have a feeling they are what's left over from the Nazi's secret moon base.
Oh maaaaaan! You have got to feel for those Nazi bastards. They went to the moon but they just couldn't avoid getting their asses torched when invading the desolate wasteland that is Russia. Classic mistake, to think Hitler didn't take a few lessons from Napoleon and the Teutons. HAHAHA
im thinking that you actually may walk normal on the moon. hear me out. it would be much easier and much more fun to hop around, and you use less energy, since you go much farther. just a thought. really interesting vid ineed to look at it muchh more. does mr. armstrong confess or talk about this vid?
maybe we are just no prepared to know. Maybe it is a conspiracy that soon will be ended when all of us are ready. Cause maybe...all this is something bigger than just "another intelligent life form in the universe"...watcha think?
The quality seems to be from the type cameras they used but it just seems to good to be true. I just can't believe someone got their hands on such a video.
It's widely known that the Astronauts encountered some strange stuff on the Moon , structured craft, some actually already landed in craters , others in the air, but also , it is less well documented , that they saw lots of biosphere-like 'glass' just hanging everywhere . Fact .
astute comment! For all you skeptics out there do your homework and read BROOKINGS REPORT where the army forces NASA not to disclose 'extraterrestrial structures you may encounter upon landing'. That ll take you back to school.
I do believe in UFOs, and I was listening to the reporter and it sounds pretty amazing. The part I don't get is why this windows look so human-made, as they have frames and two pieces of window on each room (does it come with a handle in the middle too?). Did you see the edge on each corner of the frame, sort of stylish wood finishing! If this isn't fake it has to be human made, may be travelling back in time from the future...?
Seriously, do you have any links to get more info?
Let's say this footage is genuine and that NASA is concealing information about these structures on the moon. Given the fact that the moon is very close to the Earth when talking in cosmic distances. Wouldn't it be possible to see these structures directly from Earth with a telescope?
Great point. Back in the 60s they could see it with a telescope. In fact in the 40s astronomers observed lighted locomotion on the moon. There are other photos and such that I ll post soon enough. The problem is that all structures were nuked down after been studied to prevent 'social anarchy and cultural degredation'. You see how these people work now?
actually we only ever see one part of the moon. Exactly the same side of it is always pointing at us due to the way the earth and moon rotate in unison (there is no reason fo this). Because of that you cant see most of it
yes, trust the state they neva lie. u got the state and its got 2 sub-corporations the army and nasa. these two 'fight' and truth comes out lol. its amazing how much effort they put into their new age project and how seriously ppl take it. eventhou all the info comes from one origin which is sometimes a little masked to increase confusion.
If its so widely known, isn't that then proof of a lack of a government conspiracy? ie: If its such a big deal they need to cover it up in the first place, why would they then allow it to become "well known" later on without a response?
Releasing info in small doses through anti-government reporters is the most efficient and well-targeted education of the public. All of us seeking the truth are nothing but mere tools.
The funny thing is... the longer the government(s) (or who/whatever is controlling the government(s)) wait for public disclosure, the more backlash they will get from us for keeping it a secret. This has got to be a 60 year old secret. I guess that's also a reason for these small doses of info - to lower the amount of backlash they receive from us.
Umm gmanperson? I don't know where you get your information, but the moon is too small to support an atmosphere. It does not have enough gravity, thus, any atmosphere leaks into space. Also, germany barely got their V2 rockets to work, how would they have been able to even leave our atmosphere, let alone fly to the moon and back? I'd welcome a debate, but please have your data ready.
please does anyone have more info on what this structure is or was,because it is documented factual information that their was some sort of structure on the moon available from the disclosure project
look i made an answer and apears a mesage in the box saying your mesage is in analising content,what class of content can have a mesage to have to by analised? This video i dont know if is made in the moon,bout see the floor,have a lot peacks and holes,and the man whit the camera is floating.becouse hi dont mis the equilibrium? is floating in the moon or in a pool? if is the moon, have an atmosfera, and can have sounds.you most loock a video several times before make a conclusion.
i don´t know if is a fake or not, loock the terrain, have a lot of peacks and holes, and the filmaker allways is in a stable position to film, i think hi is floating, bout i don´t know if is in a pool or in the moon ^^
And, the moon have an atmosfera for that can have sound, and NASA make test of sounds in the space and have interesting results ^^ . .
Es falso!!Que paso con la gravedad en la luna? No veo que el camera-man tenga dificultades para moverse donde la gravedad es menor que en la tierra!No hay saltos, solo movimientos continuos y precisos!! Esta filmacion esta echa aqui!!
Or that the fake was made due to the proximity of the vessel to the base... Think people! NASA and Army personnel will be useless the minute contact is announced. The are nothing more than the legalized mafia of our hometown called earth. Aliens gave them enough time to 'sell'; now the time is up, thats why all the preparation (children's movies ie Happy Feet have alien concepts and creatures.
The video? Obviously a clever fake and apparently identified as such elsewhere here from similar clips. That being said I have no doubt similar video or still images exist within NASA vaults somewhere.
I did some research on ufology. Here is what I found. The germans landed on the moon in the 40's using alien saucers. The U.S. and russians secretly landed in the 50's. The moon has a breathable atmosphere, water and vegetation. The moon landing in the 60's was a PR move. It happened... but NASA painted the sky black. Which explains why there are no stars and why the flag blows in the wind.
Um, the moon is too small to support an atmosphere. Any gasses would leak away into space, like what happened with Mars. Also, how could a country spending it's entire treasury on a losing war come up with a spacecraft capable of a moon landing? I'd welcome a debate, but have your facts ready jack.
Ever Heard of "Black Budget" Op's? You think all the crack, heroine, and $80o screw-driver money goes to Iraq? AND NASA was founded for and BY NAZI's. ITs called "PROJECT PAPER CLIP"...FACT! check it out.
Idiot. Mars has an Atmosphere! It is composed of Carbon Dioxide. If we could generate a Greenhouse Effect on mars, like we are doing here burning fossil fuels, it could be very possible that we could terraform it into a habatat for humans and animals and plants. It's not that hard to do. The moon is actually harder, so by building a base on the moon will be everything we will need to build on mars.
Mars has no magnetic field to protect the surface from deadly ultraviolet rays like earth. Our molten mantle rotates and generates the field. Mar's mantle is motionless.
Your input is astounding Konig1962! This is the reason why terraforming may just be another waste of lives and budgets. Even by generating rotation and living under antiUV structures, it just won't last. We as humans cannot supercede years of evolution with our arrogance of logic. We re mere repairmen, neither designers nor creators; so I say lets just try to clean out our garbage here on earth and save daydreaming about stealing Mars.
Of course you probably know that one way to block all forms of radiation including deep space radiation is by distributing gold dust molecules in the upper atmosphere of a planet which is what the gods(aka Angels) did on their invader planet which orbits every 3600 years through the asteroid belt. This is why there are 30,000 or so year old gold mines in africa(rusty guess)that are empty.
tell me how did u find this any information about this would be with held by the government so how in the world did u find it? let me in on it plz i need to know.
There is no atmosphere on the moon. It doesn't have enough gravity to keep an atmosphere. Just use a telescope and you will see for yourself the truth. Just look at it.
Obviously a fake using photoshop and filters- inserting images from the "real moon landing" video.Wondering if its made by some college kids or from the establishment to keep people talking about the fact that the whole lunar program was a hoax which allowed us to put some things in space (nukes) which we agreed not to do with the ruskies.
Photoshop? This is a video not a picture.Also there is alot of embedded information in pictures and video alike that can easily prove the source and alterations, especially photoshop.
If you are wondering about this video or any other of the moonlanding videos, listen to the Apollo Astronauts themselves telling of their lies and frauds, in reverse. Reverse Speech shows moonlandings were a hoax. You can hear the Astronauts tell their lies in detail on the homepage of reversespeechinternational (com) and go to Apollo Moonlandings - Hoax or Truth.
How the hell can taking one of the hundreds of things people say, playing a part backwards, and hearing "chapella" really be considered proof? Sure you can say "Well, the unconcious[spelling?] brain puts messages into everything we say." Well, the brain itself hears what it wants to hear. And that statement actually has been proved.
I don't believe for one nano second that this was filmed on the moon. The guy in the space suit does not move like he is in a low gravity environment and the filming is too smooth. I think this is a training exercise; the astronauts were put into a building structure to practice maneuverability and movement in their bulky, ungainly spacesuits.
It seems the structure is just a few feet away from the LM. Funny, no such structure appears in any of the TV views, still photos, panoramas of the landing site, or from orbit views - it's a wide open plain with nothing but rocks. That's besides the point that neither astronaut had movie cameras on that flight, just still cameras, and the one TV camera on a tripod (whose line only extended out 50 feet). Even on later flights, not one single crew member had hand-held movie cameras with them.
Of course they had movie cameras when they were playing golf and riding in their moving cart and jumping around someone was filming all this ! My uncle worked at the Cape, and he knew Neil Armstong personally. My mother also talked with his wife about the moon landing, and how she hated it when they went up.
saw a film in discovery channel today to prove or discredit the first moon landing ..and they show as if the camera was connected to the body.. so maybe this guy knows the film quility is bad... he has to go very slow.. and exagerate to get anything? maybe they recorded twice and slow this time. . .cause of bad copy?watching it over again i can see it's not really smooth.. hm.. wierd
at 1 minute see thoth ancient egyptian god. focus on middle screen top. see egyptian style woman with long braids. see emerald tablets. Too dangerous to say more.
"at 1 minute see thoth ancient egyptian god. focus on middle screen top. see egyptian style woman with long braids. see emerald tablets. Too dangerous to say more."
Thoth is also known as Enoch in the Bible. According to the Bible God took him. The dead Sea scrolls says he saw the universe and was show the secrets of the universe. The description of how he was taken in the ded sea scrolls sound alot like and alien abduction. Enoch was also considered the architect of the Great Pyramid
If you turn up the volume on the youtube player and your computer. You can hear background noises. And I'm not talking about the hissing sound. On the moon there is no atmosphere. Which means sound does not exist on the moon, because sound is air waves.
does anyone, and I mean anybody at all, have the theory that what we are seing could have been built by humans, at some point in time any time in the distant future or even in the past?
u do make sense, actually why would a civilisation travel such a long journey across light-years to do nothing on the moon? books of past, like bible, claims that ancient men can built tower of babel to reach the sky, indian texts also talked about flying machines, thus ancient men may not be so stupid after all.
Are you saying that a billion dollar telescope like the hubble is not equipped with a light filter? Look! The Hubble is equipped with a vast assortment of filters, so looking at the Moon is just a walk in the park.
As was the case with the alien autopsy film - created to discourage people from seeing the truth. It is a good exercise (although cheap)in maintaining skepticism even after you see it with your own eyes.
I think we DID find something there. But I don't think this is the footage of that. I mean, the building looks like a normal house. In one shot, you can see what appears to be a glass window or door. Why would they use glass on a world that has no atmostphere? I dont know what the strengths of glass are. whether the vacuum of space would burst the glass. but even if it didn't, if someone accidently breaks the window, then everyone inside is screwed.
This information is not for everyone. Especially for the petrified who use false assumptions for immediate dismissal of the video's credibility. Be pensive and question AFTER you ve done your research, not before.
there are quotes from armstrong about how the aliens were there when they landed and they basically said "get off the moon and stay off" to us. Why do you think NASA suddenly stopped the apollo program? Apollo 18, 19 and 20 were planned but were canceld due to "lack of funds". oh please. the government spends so much more on useless stuff it could have spent money on apollo 18-20 as well.
whoa...I heard he started to describe a strange structure and was cut off, and then when the feed came back he changed the subject.... but I never heard he met aliens. if that's true...that's pretty amazing.
I believe it's possible the moon landing was half fake, half real. I believe we did land on the moon. But the video released is a cover up of what is really on the moon. Is it so hard to believe that governments are working together to release fake information about planets and moons? How do we know for sure what exactly the gravity of our mooon is? Only NASA and other space agencies from other governments know if they are speaking the truth or not on this matter.
i think the camera movement alone is enough to raise eyebrows... doesn't matter what it is, look at how smooth that is! and they didn't have steadicams back in the 1960's, and if it is a training video or hazmat video or whatever, even if made today, why the use of steadicam? (also even steadicam isn't perfect, this would have to be track/rail based, which there is no evidence for in the video)
That's a joke, right? I mean, who could believe we can transplant a heart, split an atom, send pictures and sound wirelessly over the air - but we couldn't land someone on the moon? You must be retarded. Sorry for you.
The Russians had access to the same data, the same images. If they had any inkling that it was faked, they would have put it all over the front page of Pravda. Good thing you're smarter than every rocket scientist we or the Soviet Union ever had. Thanks for clearing that up.
Once an object leaves earth orbit, it virtually impossible to know that it is even there. So in essence, the Russians did not have the means of neither proving it, nor disproving it. However, with today's technology, I'm quite sure the Russians would of disproved it had the U.S. attempted the same hoax.
According to NASA, the images and voices were sent from the Moon to the Earth via radio. When this was happening (or was supposed to be happening), it would have been the easiest thing in the world for the Soviets to point a receiver at the Moon and see if any radio signals were coming from it. If there had not been, the Soviets would have let the world know. They would have buried the US, without firing a shot.
What do yo8u think Appollo 13 was all about? it was a moon landing but it failed. My uncle worked for the cape and he knew Neil Armstrong and his family personally. My parents also met them. Man did go to the moon the first time and the last time.
The most incredible footage of this type I have seen. If this is a hoax, it is a very expensive and complex hoax. It looks real except for the smoothness of the camera movement. I am at a loss as to an explanation.
This structure was situated north of Moltke crater, at the Sea of Tranquility. NASA got its first close inspection through Surveyor 5 in 1967 collecting 19,000 photos of it. It was 60m long with 12 windows on each side. The materials' consistency was 60% oxygen and 0.01% hydrogen. The prevalent wear of the walls along with the lack of atmosphere suggest an age of thousands of years. This along with other remnants were nuked for not disturbing our social upheaval.
The camera is on a robotic rover type device and is being remotely controlled. This explains the movement and the occasional jerk of the camera when panning begins. The camera is also self leveling and this can be seen as a correction that starts with a jerk also (electric motor firing up). I believe it is real.
Thanks for posting this vid. Very interesting. I'd like to reasearch it further for myself. Can you point the way? Where did you get your information from? Feel free to email me privately if you prefer.
Armstrong's heartbeat reached 160bpm. NASA's explanation was that he was carrying 25kgs worth of samples, yet these are no more than 4kgs on the moon. Initially they were amazed by an array of landed discs perfectly alligned and tall beings in white suits. This is all recorded in their transmission to Houston which advises them to turn around and start working. Who do you think is going to go broke if existence of advanced noble species breaks out and we all unify on this planet?
NASA acknowledges the possibility that there is alien life; They've written some pretty complex regulations about what should be done in the event of a contact. So it's possible that what they're doing here is training for the possibility of encountering aliens or alien artifacts on the moon. ....Since when? Since after this video was brought back from their trip? :D
No. Since April of 1961 when Brookings Report, Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs was compiled. In a nutshell, it voids all responsibility from the army (NASA's boss) in the case that info about E.T. life is revealed to the public. Look it up.
They bombed it did they? And no one noticed an explosion on an object that is continually in our sky?
Astronomers have been able to get high resolution pictures of the moon long before there was a landing. If there was an alien structure on the moon we would have all known about it 70 years ago.
Furthermore, what kind of spacefaring alien builds a structure that looks like it was made out of mud?
Notice from 40sec to about 56sec center picture there is a streetlight in the background with an automobile making a lefthand turn into a parkinglot. I knew it! There are Walmarts on the moon!
seriously it is bizarre and just like some x-files TV series,can we know more information if possible what is this non us source ?? and what channel and documentarty this movie was shown in ?? if you don't mind NAlexo,it is so interesting
the problem is in the quality , anyone can argue that it was filmed on earth ,in fact part of my mind says so
If anyone is interested in more Moon structures and bases, hunt down the book "We Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon", by Steckling. A *very* good book, that includes many lunar photographs that have not been made public - especially on the dark side. Recommended!
Interesting video, for sure. I agree with 'gavincurtis', that logo in the upper right needs to be identified. Also, the one thing I find strange/implausible was that the lander was parked right next to the structure. I find it hard to swallow that NASA would allow them to land so close - especially if there might have been structures underground as well.
continued 1: "Seems to me that even in such low gravity you'd still have similar *lateral* body movements because the body's mass doesn't change with varying gravity, plus you've got the backpacks, etc,. Studying the videos of the astros moonwalking should give a clue... "
from a friend who is a video pro: "Looks like an elaborate CGI production, intentionally degraded to cover the seams and make the new footage of uniform quality with the old. The camera movements look more like steadicam than handheld, and the camera mainly looks straight ahead and tracks sideways, does very little panning, and almost no tilting up to capture ceiling details. Handheld shooting generally behaves very differently from what we see here."
I believe this is not astronauts but haz-mat men working on earth. Some of these structures look like wood, especially at the end. It looks like window frames. The raking at the end it telling. Arson investigation/Hazmat kind of probing? This is not the moon.
why is the quality so poor? Other lunar footage doesn't look this goofed up. Really detracts from its credibility in my book, unfortunately. That's my opinion.
I'm speechless. Whitley Strieber and other ufologists have witnessed flimsy wooden-like materials on many UFOs. Did you notice the butterfly-shaped hyroglyphic on the side of the structure toward the end? When you see one of the astronauts standing underneath it, your heart really does stop! However, it probably IS a training video, but that doesn't explain the poor quality, unless the entire moon landing WAS a hoax!
1. Smooth camera movement. The astronauts found it difficult to walk in the moon's 1/6g gravity. They frequently stumbled and fell, eventually settling on a 'bunny hop' type of movement. The camera in this video is very still, almost like it's on rail.
2. The space suits. The suits do not in any way match the suits worn during Apollo 11.
This is either a training video, a fake, or a reinactment.
well it's so smooth i dont think anyone on earch can record it that way... and the answer for this is it's probly on a special mount... which can mean fake or real... then again i saw today in discovery channel that a special way is needed to bring film to space in the first place.. or it wont work.. but by the 11th maybe they got it right by then hm...
Question....take a look at the segment with the "astronaut" at the 4:53 minute mark. Does any one notice something wierd about the movements of the figure? He goes from leaning far back to leaning forward without moving his feet much. He seems to move in a way that would only be possible under low gravity conditions! It would be hard for any ordinarry people to budget a hoax like that. I think it may be a training video also; but i wish it were true!
Looks like the logo at 2:24 has been put onto the film after the original recording. It doesn't look like it's part of the wall, but part of the film at a specific moment. It doesn't stay put on the wall at the same place. Possibly this film has been taped of a video monitor and the logo is part of the monitor.
WOW.. ive never seen sombody handle a camera like that. SOOOO SMOOOOTH with fantastic decreasing velocity at every turn.. no ups and downs and perfect inertia... FORGET the structure.. this guy has some fantastic camera abilities !
1. the distortions on the film are too homogenous all the way through, look like add-on
2. Think of moving around in a space suit and getting that stable a video in an unknown place. I think Neil would have stopped, filmed, stopped the cam, moved, stopped, filmed instead.
3. No audio - the guy probably would be saying something recognisable or comparable to Neils voice if this was genuine.
If they had a crane or "cherry-picker" then I would say it's possible. Notice the different elevations occurring with the camera. Even with little gravity I'm sure the astronaut couldn't jump that high to get some of those shots.
There is no pyramid in these shapes although aliens seem to like pyramid monuments
luxeden 4 years ago 681
For early pyramids look at Mars' surface
NAlexo 4 years ago 18
Dear Sir. I whould like to know when exactly these moonstructures where observed for the first time. The mounth palamor 250 cm reflector lens could have made very good pictures of the moon from the 1920st. If there was alreaddy convincing evidence in those day's than this information could have triggered organisations as the Amerikan Interplanetary Society 1930, the BIS 1933 the VIR, GRID etc. The BIS attracted many later famous SF writers. Thanks. Mathieu.
thieu4u 4 years ago 443
wow, pretty bizarre, NAlexo,,, where did you get this? the other lunar shots, if i recall, were more clear and distinct, these are fuzzy. i was a kid when the first guy stepped on the moon. but astronauts can definitly be seen in a couple of frames. if i was an astronaut filming this, i would have to clean out my jockeys when i was done filming.
lightfoot500 4 years ago 232
The fuzziness and background hiss are my faults. I m not a media expert and these are from posting it here by any means necessary.
NAlexo 4 years ago 6
So who visited the moon before us?
luxeden 4 years ago 329
NATO says there are 57 races documented. The moon could have easily been a relay station.
NAlexo 4 years ago 16
Why are we only seeing this now? Surely there would have been more stuff said about the existance of a base on the Moon, now who would set that up? Could be evidence of us being monitered years ago (all those old pictures and sculptered Disk shaped objects) though what the hell would have happened to them, and did they come from Mars, or somewhre further.
TheTimeTraveller 4 years ago 241
whether we react to them but how. Accordingly favored propagandas are formed and delivered.
NAlexo 4 years ago 10
but dam a good fiction story or truth i got a fuckin headache but man nobody i know off and thats like thousands of normal people dont like trust the gov its a shame that congress in itself has been caught lying and cheating even on frontline and 60 minutes makes these stories somewhat plausible
zrodn001 4 years ago 7
whatever this is its a good story man either a good science fiction tale or hard core truth wow anyway i have heard that they nuked the evidence on the moon after they excavated and did there research for national security because other countries got space vehicles
zrodn001 4 years ago 7
wooooow i never saw this one on tv before !
louwie1 4 years ago 7
Crime of the century if this was covered up- i have pals who saw UFOs follow the 90 space shuttle in Florida...
bcpietsch 4 years ago 10
why the hell when im trying to comment on this post im being placed in moderation whatever happened to free speech
zrodn001 4 years ago 19
Just tell me something, wy the camera is moving like it is floating ot flying or something like that? Astronauts walk jumping in the moon, we saw it, so wy the camera runs so steady? Because it is a fake, maybe. Belive me, I wish to be wrong with all my heart, but is hard to belive this video.
gabycuattro 4 years ago 21
Whoever is opinionated about the smoothness of camera's motion please remember: This is not America's Funniest Videos. These people were trained years for what they did. Moreover do you thnk they had Super 8 in their hands?
NAlexo 4 years ago
Dear sir. The first thing that struck me in this video was the monolith kind of stone in one of the rooms. If this video is real thaall the other apollo flights where pointed to other structures. It would be rediculous to find ruïns of a ancient civilisation in the first flight and than go collecting rocks with the other apollo missions. I remember very well that befor going to the moon, satelites went to the moon to make very well pictures of the surface..1 / 4
thieu4u 4 years ago 19
The missions that followed did not involve collecting rocks, rather explorations of other sites with remnants (including the obelisc zone). There were over 20,000 photos of them taken before Apollo 11 landing.
NAlexo 4 years ago
So, if there where ruins, or buildings, they had all the information before they determined the landingplaces. Very probable, Stanley Kubrick must have known about it and in his movie 2001 he alreaddy sended the message to the world that they found traces of a old civilisation of 5000000 years as I remember well. And in that movie, we see the monolith. If he and the writer of the book Arthur Clarke knew that nasa discovered ruins on the moon... 2/4
thieu4u 4 years ago 10
It is a well know fact that Hollywood tests for the public's pulse (War of the Worlds, The Day that Earth Stood Still, E.T., Star Wars, Fire in the Sky, Communion, Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Signs). What matters to the Army is not
NAlexo 4 years ago
they could have based the whole story on this facts. In a way they could have prepaired the whole world alreaddy for these proves of live elswhere in the universe with the in 1971 mind blowing movie 2001, that influenced my artistic work deeply. I hope that you have more video stuff of the other landings. PS. Is it possible that this video is so smooth because they shot probably with more than 24 pictures a second. 3/4
thieu4u 4 years ago 7
You can see this clearly when the astronaut is traying to collect some rocks and debri at the end. I have the feeling that you see clearly that it is slow motion. I can not wait to see the next video. If this is true, I start to understand why the astronauts, who where my herous in those days, disapeared very soon out of the in the media and lived suddenly a different live. Keep up the good work. Greetings from Belgium. Mathieu. 4/4
thieu4u 4 years ago 115
Thank you for your sincere and thoughtful feedback Mathieu.
NAlexo 4 years ago 15
I agree. If you were on the moon in a low-gravity environment filming the ruins of an alien civilization, would you hop around like an idiot or take slow, methodical steps to ensure good camerawork.
brshelton000 4 years ago 66
too bad the moon does not spin as it circles the earth then we would be able to see the dark side of the moon. Sense noone can see it then there is no way to prove it. Another thing if we went all that way to go to the moon to prove us, why did we plant the USA flag on the dark side where noone can see it, you think they would of took the effort to put it on the side to show it to the whole world.
spider2021 4 years ago 29
if we can clearly see the side of the moon that faces the earth, why would we explore it? The moon is so bright, and telescopes so strong that we can make out anything. If there is something on the moon, it would be on the dark side.
Gekmdal 4 years ago 195
the moon spins at a rate that is timed so that the side of the moon that you see is always there... in Australia you'd see the opposite side of the moon but you'd only ever see that side.
Sadochrist 4 years ago
Is that real? I can't notice anything from that video but it looks awesome in first look but why are they not jumping, walking on moon is very hard.
W1zzar3 4 years ago
A habitable moon? Nothing's too crazy for the Conspiracy Theorist. Considering Project Paperclip is real, and NASA technically was run by Nazi's, I don't know what to believe anymore.
KmKGreyhat 4 years ago 11
NASA was far from being run by Nazis. von Braun and his German team were only involved in booster design and rocketry. NASA itself was run by Americans (ie. James Webb etc).
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
though im surely not convinced i wouldnt doubt the possibillity at all
BrandynBoyles 4 years ago 5
Why have we never been back? cause its inhabited!
potter0067 4 years ago 16
No, its cuz "Van Allen Belt" radiation will kill you.
RideMyBMW 4 years ago
Absolutely incredible footage! Thank you SO MUCH for posting this. We DID land on the moon, and saw stuff like this- that is why they shot the fake footage- to cover it up. This is the REAL footage. These structures may well be from alien civilizations, but I have a feeling they are what's left over from the Nazi's secret moon base.
19ufo47 4 years ago 8
Oh maaaaaan! You have got to feel for those Nazi bastards. They went to the moon but they just couldn't avoid getting their asses torched when invading the desolate wasteland that is Russia. Classic mistake, to think Hitler didn't take a few lessons from Napoleon and the Teutons. HAHAHA
ijustwanttosignin 4 years ago
im thinking that you actually may walk normal on the moon. hear me out. it would be much easier and much more fun to hop around, and you use less energy, since you go much farther. just a thought. really interesting vid ineed to look at it muchh more. does mr. armstrong confess or talk about this vid?
gunnerdan 4 years ago 5
wooaaahhh. this is some weird stuff. I dont know how someone can fake this. where'd you get this vid man?
IcyDice187 4 years ago 4
until now, you guys still believed that armstrong really walk on the moon?
glennguts 4 years ago
yo apoyo tu teoria. i suport your teory sorry for my english
darthvenom84 4 years ago
Real or Not its a Creepy video.
SanguineCthulhu 4 years ago 12
maybe we are just no prepared to know. Maybe it is a conspiracy that soon will be ended when all of us are ready. Cause maybe...all this is something bigger than just "another intelligent life form in the universe"...watcha think?
Pinchoro 4 years ago 12
The quality seems to be from the type cameras they used but it just seems to good to be true. I just can't believe someone got their hands on such a video.
BuzzmanAZ 4 years ago 6
umm the moon does have an atmosphere... albeit about an inch think on the surface, buy yea it would be disturbed by the solar winds.
DrBlackross 4 years ago
i was just a kid.but i do remember that armsrong reacted to somthing and they tried to shut him up.
sugarwells 4 years ago 6
It's widely known that the Astronauts encountered some strange stuff on the Moon , structured craft, some actually already landed in craters , others in the air, but also , it is less well documented , that they saw lots of biosphere-like 'glass' just hanging everywhere . Fact .
nikovich 4 years ago 4
astute comment! For all you skeptics out there do your homework and read BROOKINGS REPORT where the army forces NASA not to disclose 'extraterrestrial structures you may encounter upon landing'. That ll take you back to school.
NAlexo 4 years ago 2
I do believe in UFOs, and I was listening to the reporter and it sounds pretty amazing. The part I don't get is why this windows look so human-made, as they have frames and two pieces of window on each room (does it come with a handle in the middle too?). Did you see the edge on each corner of the frame, sort of stylish wood finishing! If this isn't fake it has to be human made, may be travelling back in time from the future...?
Seriously, do you have any links to get more info?
MacGyver29600 4 years ago
Let's say this footage is genuine and that NASA is concealing information about these structures on the moon. Given the fact that the moon is very close to the Earth when talking in cosmic distances. Wouldn't it be possible to see these structures directly from Earth with a telescope?
Pikheysur 4 years ago 7
Great point. Back in the 60s they could see it with a telescope. In fact in the 40s astronomers observed lighted locomotion on the moon. There are other photos and such that I ll post soon enough. The problem is that all structures were nuked down after been studied to prevent 'social anarchy and cultural degredation'. You see how these people work now?
NAlexo 4 years ago
fuck yeh i read about that shit in the old dayz people could see traffic and heaps of movement on the moon
PinkDovextc 4 years ago
actually we only ever see one part of the moon. Exactly the same side of it is always pointing at us due to the way the earth and moon rotate in unison (there is no reason fo this). Because of that you cant see most of it
testiest 4 years ago
yes, trust the state they neva lie. u got the state and its got 2 sub-corporations the army and nasa. these two 'fight' and truth comes out lol. its amazing how much effort they put into their new age project and how seriously ppl take it. eventhou all the info comes from one origin which is sometimes a little masked to increase confusion.
3swoosh2 4 years ago 4
If its so widely known, isn't that then proof of a lack of a government conspiracy? ie: If its such a big deal they need to cover it up in the first place, why would they then allow it to become "well known" later on without a response?
pookster111 4 years ago 2
Releasing info in small doses through anti-government reporters is the most efficient and well-targeted education of the public. All of us seeking the truth are nothing but mere tools.
NAlexo 4 years ago
The funny thing is... the longer the government(s) (or who/whatever is controlling the government(s)) wait for public disclosure, the more backlash they will get from us for keeping it a secret. This has got to be a 60 year old secret. I guess that's also a reason for these small doses of info - to lower the amount of backlash they receive from us.
gmanperson 4 years ago
Umm gmanperson? I don't know where you get your information, but the moon is too small to support an atmosphere. It does not have enough gravity, thus, any atmosphere leaks into space. Also, germany barely got their V2 rockets to work, how would they have been able to even leave our atmosphere, let alone fly to the moon and back? I'd welcome a debate, but please have your data ready.
SmokingFox33 4 years ago 3
I'm not surprise if Nasa did it again. LOL
StaRrySky 4 years ago
egypt its them it always has been not alien just older than us
tomqelectronica 4 years ago
The moon landings were not faked.
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago 11
please does anyone have more info on what this structure is or was,because it is documented factual information that their was some sort of structure on the moon available from the disclosure project
dlg111 4 years ago
It has been proven this is from a tv show in greece the logo is the station logo look it up
guttcheckk 4 years ago
Yeh i cant beliv that the moon landing was "fake" but i give it after so much proof.
mads132 4 years ago
look i made an answer and apears a mesage in the box saying your mesage is in analising content,what class of content can have a mesage to have to by analised? This video i dont know if is made in the moon,bout see the floor,have a lot peacks and holes,and the man whit the camera is floating.becouse hi dont mis the equilibrium? is floating in the moon or in a pool? if is the moon, have an atmosfera, and can have sounds.you most loock a video several times before make a conclusion.
AMONZEUZ 4 years ago
i don´t know if is a fake or not, loock the terrain, have a lot of peacks and holes, and the filmaker allways is in a stable position to film, i think hi is floating, bout i don´t know if is in a pool or in the moon ^^
And, the moon have an atmosfera for that can have sound, and NASA make test of sounds in the space and have interesting results ^^ . .
i beliave in this video
AMONZEUZ 4 years ago
Es falso!!Que paso con la gravedad en la luna? No veo que el camera-man tenga dificultades para moverse donde la gravedad es menor que en la tierra!No hay saltos, solo movimientos continuos y precisos!! Esta filmacion esta echa aqui!!
ommadawn0677 4 years ago
Or that the fake was made due to the proximity of the vessel to the base... Think people! NASA and Army personnel will be useless the minute contact is announced. The are nothing more than the legalized mafia of our hometown called earth. Aliens gave them enough time to 'sell'; now the time is up, thats why all the preparation (children's movies ie Happy Feet have alien concepts and creatures.
NAlexo 4 years ago
The video? Obviously a clever fake and apparently identified as such elsewhere here from similar clips. That being said I have no doubt similar video or still images exist within NASA vaults somewhere.
megatherium99 4 years ago
I did some research on ufology. Here is what I found. The germans landed on the moon in the 40's using alien saucers. The U.S. and russians secretly landed in the 50's. The moon has a breathable atmosphere, water and vegetation. The moon landing in the 60's was a PR move. It happened... but NASA painted the sky black. Which explains why there are no stars and why the flag blows in the wind.
gmanperson 4 years ago
loooooooooooooool look outside the window ;)
metelko 4 years ago
Your half right gmanperson cause I remember studying this one. It wasn`t the germans who landed in the 40`s, it was the irish. That`s a pub!
HaroldKock 4 years ago 12
rofl
toothpik00 4 years ago
I need what drug you take!!!
hamwinkie 4 years ago 2
You are joking right?
ChrissyoSpace 4 years ago
Um, the moon is too small to support an atmosphere. Any gasses would leak away into space, like what happened with Mars. Also, how could a country spending it's entire treasury on a losing war come up with a spacecraft capable of a moon landing? I'd welcome a debate, but have your facts ready jack.
SmokingFox33 4 years ago
Ever Heard of "Black Budget" Op's? You think all the crack, heroine, and $80o screw-driver money goes to Iraq? AND NASA was founded for and BY NAZI's. ITs called "PROJECT PAPER CLIP"...FACT! check it out.
MCAZ33M 4 years ago
Idiot. Mars has an Atmosphere! It is composed of Carbon Dioxide. If we could generate a Greenhouse Effect on mars, like we are doing here burning fossil fuels, it could be very possible that we could terraform it into a habatat for humans and animals and plants. It's not that hard to do. The moon is actually harder, so by building a base on the moon will be everything we will need to build on mars.
LordBicen 4 years ago 3
Mars has no magnetic field to protect the surface from deadly ultraviolet rays like earth. Our molten mantle rotates and generates the field. Mar's mantle is motionless.
Konig1962 4 years ago 4
Your input is astounding Konig1962! This is the reason why terraforming may just be another waste of lives and budgets. Even by generating rotation and living under antiUV structures, it just won't last. We as humans cannot supercede years of evolution with our arrogance of logic. We re mere repairmen, neither designers nor creators; so I say lets just try to clean out our garbage here on earth and save daydreaming about stealing Mars.
NAlexo 4 years ago
Of course you probably know that one way to block all forms of radiation including deep space radiation is by distributing gold dust molecules in the upper atmosphere of a planet which is what the gods(aka Angels) did on their invader planet which orbits every 3600 years through the asteroid belt. This is why there are 30,000 or so year old gold mines in africa(rusty guess)that are empty.
boojysince1965 4 years ago
indeed
cv6ady 4 years ago
tell me how did u find this any information about this would be with held by the government so how in the world did u find it? let me in on it plz i need to know.
Hyperkid2386 4 years ago
There is no atmosphere on the moon. It doesn't have enough gravity to keep an atmosphere. Just use a telescope and you will see for yourself the truth. Just look at it.
Konig1962 4 years ago
i looked at the moon with a telescope never see much but moon what should i be looking for
PinkDovextc 4 years ago
wrong telescope my friend. Try this:
1178A.D. summer, Gervase of Canterbury and fellow monks witnessing several lights on the moon
1789 and 1843A.D. Schroter discovers immense illuminations and crater shifts!
1835 Sir John Herschel confirms
1950 Wilkins, unidentified lights
1953 O'Neill observes lunar bridge 12mi long
1977 British astronomer, Plato crater lights moving
Look it up for yourself
NAlexo 4 years ago
Excellent post my friend!!!
potter0067 4 years ago
no creo que sea real...el video tiene sonido ambiental...eso es lo raro...en el espacio NO HAY SONIDO.
pavilionrt 4 years ago
Obviously a fake using photoshop and filters- inserting images from the "real moon landing" video.Wondering if its made by some college kids or from the establishment to keep people talking about the fact that the whole lunar program was a hoax which allowed us to put some things in space (nukes) which we agreed not to do with the ruskies.
OlBenFranklin 4 years ago
Photoshop? This is a video not a picture.Also there is alot of embedded information in pictures and video alike that can easily prove the source and alterations, especially photoshop.
boojysince1965 4 years ago
If you are wondering about this video or any other of the moonlanding videos, listen to the Apollo Astronauts themselves telling of their lies and frauds, in reverse. Reverse Speech shows moonlandings were a hoax. You can hear the Astronauts tell their lies in detail on the homepage of reversespeechinternational (com) and go to Apollo Moonlandings - Hoax or Truth.
SheWolf58 4 years ago
How the hell can taking one of the hundreds of things people say, playing a part backwards, and hearing "chapella" really be considered proof? Sure you can say "Well, the unconcious[spelling?] brain puts messages into everything we say." Well, the brain itself hears what it wants to hear. And that statement actually has been proved.
atram113 4 years ago
IDIOT
phallanx50 4 years ago
Sorry to break it to ya, but reverse speach is bullshit. With a capital 'B'. Mysticism and Technology don't mix. BTW This vid is a fake imo.
Wish it wasn't..
Tattoo1377 4 years ago
You need to watch this movie:
A funny thing happened on the way to the moon
hctiwtac 4 years ago
I cant see what it is
mads132 4 years ago
Can anyone tell me how Armsrong & Aldrin took this video/film when all they were equipped with were still Hassleblad cameras?
MichelNey1815 4 years ago 5
I don't believe for one nano second that this was filmed on the moon. The guy in the space suit does not move like he is in a low gravity environment and the filming is too smooth. I think this is a training exercise; the astronauts were put into a building structure to practice maneuverability and movement in their bulky, ungainly spacesuits.
Turandot29 4 years ago 11
It seems the structure is just a few feet away from the LM. Funny, no such structure appears in any of the TV views, still photos, panoramas of the landing site, or from orbit views - it's a wide open plain with nothing but rocks. That's besides the point that neither astronaut had movie cameras on that flight, just still cameras, and the one TV camera on a tripod (whose line only extended out 50 feet). Even on later flights, not one single crew member had hand-held movie cameras with them.
MichelNey1815 4 years ago 5
Of course they had movie cameras when they were playing golf and riding in their moving cart and jumping around someone was filming all this ! My uncle worked at the Cape, and he knew Neil Armstong personally. My mother also talked with his wife about the moon landing, and how she hated it when they went up.
allexx123 4 years ago
saw a film in discovery channel today to prove or discredit the first moon landing ..and they show as if the camera was connected to the body.. so maybe this guy knows the film quility is bad... he has to go very slow.. and exagerate to get anything? maybe they recorded twice and slow this time. . .cause of bad copy?watching it over again i can see it's not really smooth.. hm.. wierd
shadowlesswalls 4 years ago
you have to check Neil's and Aldrin's faces as soon as they arrive home. They re in deep distress.
NAlexo 4 years ago
Maybe the logo on the left is ...ETI
SETI.
lllliill 4 years ago
WHAT DOES NEIL SAY ABOUT THIS HERE?
Burnie66 4 years ago
I'll only believe this if Neil confirms it to be true.
jehr222 4 years ago 3
at 1 minute see thoth ancient egyptian god. focus on middle screen top. see egyptian style woman with long braids. see emerald tablets. Too dangerous to say more.
darevalation 4 years ago
"at 1 minute see thoth ancient egyptian god. focus on middle screen top. see egyptian style woman with long braids. see emerald tablets. Too dangerous to say more."
Thoth is also known as Enoch in the Bible. According to the Bible God took him. The dead Sea scrolls says he saw the universe and was show the secrets of the universe. The description of how he was taken in the ded sea scrolls sound alot like and alien abduction. Enoch was also considered the architect of the Great Pyramid
mapboy78 4 years ago
Why are there so many support columns when this is on the moon?
majingohan25 4 years ago
you question is stupid. it's like asking why there's a car by the side walk.. maybe it's because it's just there.
StaRrySky 4 years ago 2
If you turn up the volume on the youtube player and your computer. You can hear background noises. And I'm not talking about the hissing sound. On the moon there is no atmosphere. Which means sound does not exist on the moon, because sound is air waves.
olegnadthegreat 4 years ago
olegnadthegreat , the background noises are there because its somebody filming a tv
mervingj 4 years ago
does anyone, and I mean anybody at all, have the theory that what we are seing could have been built by humans, at some point in time any time in the distant future or even in the past?
dannypayne 4 years ago 2
u do make sense, actually why would a civilisation travel such a long journey across light-years to do nothing on the moon? books of past, like bible, claims that ancient men can built tower of babel to reach the sky, indian texts also talked about flying machines, thus ancient men may not be so stupid after all.
thegreatestchallenge 4 years ago 48
The moon is too bright for Hubble. It would just burn out the optics.
AliasUndercover 4 years ago
Are you saying that a billion dollar telescope like the hubble is not equipped with a light filter? Look! The Hubble is equipped with a vast assortment of filters, so looking at the Moon is just a walk in the park.
fanbutton 4 years ago
jesus christ you guys can't possibly be serious.
mrbonez 4 years ago 7
I tought the moon landing was faked?
lceven 4 years ago
As was the case with the alien autopsy film - created to discourage people from seeing the truth. It is a good exercise (although cheap)in maintaining skepticism even after you see it with your own eyes.
graphicsfx 4 years ago
I think we DID find something there. But I don't think this is the footage of that. I mean, the building looks like a normal house. In one shot, you can see what appears to be a glass window or door. Why would they use glass on a world that has no atmostphere? I dont know what the strengths of glass are. whether the vacuum of space would burst the glass. but even if it didn't, if someone accidently breaks the window, then everyone inside is screwed.
zikten 4 years ago 4
This information is not for everyone. Especially for the petrified who use false assumptions for immediate dismissal of the video's credibility. Be pensive and question AFTER you ve done your research, not before.
NAlexo 4 years ago
I like how Armstrong is really nice and smooth as he moves around, which is how somebody should move... on the moon...
c0n7r0lfr34k 4 years ago
I don't know if that's the LEM shown toward the end or not. It looks too short and squat. Maybe this is from Chernobyl.
Engage777 4 years ago
I have to agree with you after watching it a second time.
keithguh 4 years ago
there are quotes from armstrong about how the aliens were there when they landed and they basically said "get off the moon and stay off" to us. Why do you think NASA suddenly stopped the apollo program? Apollo 18, 19 and 20 were planned but were canceld due to "lack of funds". oh please. the government spends so much more on useless stuff it could have spent money on apollo 18-20 as well.
gmanperson 4 years ago 4
whoa...I heard he started to describe a strange structure and was cut off, and then when the feed came back he changed the subject.... but I never heard he met aliens. if that's true...that's pretty amazing.
zikten 4 years ago
I believe it's possible the moon landing was half fake, half real. I believe we did land on the moon. But the video released is a cover up of what is really on the moon. Is it so hard to believe that governments are working together to release fake information about planets and moons? How do we know for sure what exactly the gravity of our mooon is? Only NASA and other space agencies from other governments know if they are speaking the truth or not on this matter.
gmanperson 4 years ago 3
EXCELLENT point gmanperson!!!!
NAlexo 4 years ago
Ummm...the only time you need square structures like that are when you need to resist the force of gravity trying to pull it down.
"What if the aliens had antigravity?"
If they had that kind of technology building a lame box frame construction is just a waste of resources and pointless in a zero g environment.
theeastvillage 4 years ago
I like the bit at about 2:40 minutes he appears to climb smoothly over some large rocks holding the camera at shin level.
mjlush 4 years ago
i think the camera movement alone is enough to raise eyebrows... doesn't matter what it is, look at how smooth that is! and they didn't have steadicams back in the 1960's, and if it is a training video or hazmat video or whatever, even if made today, why the use of steadicam? (also even steadicam isn't perfect, this would have to be track/rail based, which there is no evidence for in the video)
drencrum 4 years ago 2
"They never landed on the Moon to begin with"
Then how did those mirrors we placed on the moon get there, how come we can bounce lasers off them and measure the distance to the moon perfectly?
outworld1 4 years ago 4
Robotics! The same way we can get relay signals from a Mars rover to an orbiting satellite for relay to Earth. Simple.
fanbutton 4 years ago
So we can send sophisticated mirror positioning robots to land on the moon, but not people? That's absurd.
nazlfrag 4 years ago 3
Would these mirrors happen to be shaped like frisbees?
Obviously, NASA held a contest to see who could toss these to the moon!!
Kidding...
farang 4 years ago
if this was real believe me, the general public would never get their hands on this
LTDANMAN44 4 years ago 5
They never landed on the Moon to begin with.. A big hoax to impress the Russians during the cold war.
frannyward 4 years ago
That's a joke, right? I mean, who could believe we can transplant a heart, split an atom, send pictures and sound wirelessly over the air - but we couldn't land someone on the moon? You must be retarded. Sorry for you.
troll67 4 years ago 3
The Russians had access to the same data, the same images. If they had any inkling that it was faked, they would have put it all over the front page of Pravda. Good thing you're smarter than every rocket scientist we or the Soviet Union ever had. Thanks for clearing that up.
TimmonsCello 4 years ago 7
Once an object leaves earth orbit, it virtually impossible to know that it is even there. So in essence, the Russians did not have the means of neither proving it, nor disproving it. However, with today's technology, I'm quite sure the Russians would of disproved it had the U.S. attempted the same hoax.
fanbutton 4 years ago
According to NASA, the images and voices were sent from the Moon to the Earth via radio. When this was happening (or was supposed to be happening), it would have been the easiest thing in the world for the Soviets to point a receiver at the Moon and see if any radio signals were coming from it. If there had not been, the Soviets would have let the world know. They would have buried the US, without firing a shot.
SailorBarsoom 4 years ago 12
What do yo8u think Appollo 13 was all about? it was a moon landing but it failed. My uncle worked for the cape and he knew Neil Armstrong and his family personally. My parents also met them. Man did go to the moon the first time and the last time.
allexx123 4 years ago 2
planeta encantado
NAlexo 4 years ago
amazing,if big brother is watching you missed a big one not making this dissapear
jamesraymondcourt 4 years ago
The most incredible footage of this type I have seen. If this is a hoax, it is a very expensive and complex hoax. It looks real except for the smoothness of the camera movement. I am at a loss as to an explanation.
deeshaw2 4 years ago
This structure was situated north of Moltke crater, at the Sea of Tranquility. NASA got its first close inspection through Surveyor 5 in 1967 collecting 19,000 photos of it. It was 60m long with 12 windows on each side. The materials' consistency was 60% oxygen and 0.01% hydrogen. The prevalent wear of the walls along with the lack of atmosphere suggest an age of thousands of years. This along with other remnants were nuked for not disturbing our social upheaval.
NAlexo 4 years ago
The camera is on a robotic rover type device and is being remotely controlled. This explains the movement and the occasional jerk of the camera when panning begins. The camera is also self leveling and this can be seen as a correction that starts with a jerk also (electric motor firing up). I believe it is real.
deeshaw2 4 years ago
Did they even have a robotic rover device back in '69? LoL!
DragonGuy1 4 years ago
NAlexo,
Thanks for posting this vid. Very interesting. I'd like to reasearch it further for myself. Can you point the way? Where did you get your information from? Feel free to email me privately if you prefer.
CraigBurnett 4 years ago
Armstrong's heartbeat reached 160bpm. NASA's explanation was that he was carrying 25kgs worth of samples, yet these are no more than 4kgs on the moon. Initially they were amazed by an array of landed discs perfectly alligned and tall beings in white suits. This is all recorded in their transmission to Houston which advises them to turn around and start working. Who do you think is going to go broke if existence of advanced noble species breaks out and we all unify on this planet?
NAlexo 4 years ago
NASA acknowledges the possibility that there is alien life; They've written some pretty complex regulations about what should be done in the event of a contact. So it's possible that what they're doing here is training for the possibility of encountering aliens or alien artifacts on the moon. ....Since when? Since after this video was brought back from their trip? :D
Kaiju666 4 years ago
No. Since April of 1961 when Brookings Report, Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs was compiled. In a nutshell, it voids all responsibility from the army (NASA's boss) in the case that info about E.T. life is revealed to the public. Look it up.
NAlexo 4 years ago
They bombed it did they? And no one noticed an explosion on an object that is continually in our sky?
Astronomers have been able to get high resolution pictures of the moon long before there was a landing. If there was an alien structure on the moon we would have all known about it 70 years ago.
Furthermore, what kind of spacefaring alien builds a structure that looks like it was made out of mud?
joshuastark 4 years ago 7
In any case, this is a very interesting and thought-provoking video, and thanks to you for finding and posting it!
emtube 4 years ago
Notice from 40sec to about 56sec center picture there is a streetlight in the background with an automobile making a lefthand turn into a parkinglot. I knew it! There are Walmarts on the moon!
fattypepper 4 years ago 3
seriously it is bizarre and just like some x-files TV series,can we know more information if possible what is this non us source ?? and what channel and documentarty this movie was shown in ?? if you don't mind NAlexo,it is so interesting
the problem is in the quality , anyone can argue that it was filmed on earth ,in fact part of my mind says so
zeinobia 4 years ago
The movement is so smooth, is the camera on a buggy, how is it stabilized?
mrbonaparte 4 years ago
If anyone is interested in more Moon structures and bases, hunt down the book "We Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon", by Steckling. A *very* good book, that includes many lunar photographs that have not been made public - especially on the dark side. Recommended!
Krokodyle 4 years ago
Interesting video, for sure. I agree with 'gavincurtis', that logo in the upper right needs to be identified. Also, the one thing I find strange/implausible was that the lander was parked right next to the structure. I find it hard to swallow that NASA would allow them to land so close - especially if there might have been structures underground as well.
Krokodyle 4 years ago 2
continued 1: "Seems to me that even in such low gravity you'd still have similar *lateral* body movements because the body's mass doesn't change with varying gravity, plus you've got the backpacks, etc,. Studying the videos of the astros moonwalking should give a clue... "
vimanaboy 4 years ago
from a friend who is a video pro: "Looks like an elaborate CGI production, intentionally degraded to cover the seams and make the new footage of uniform quality with the old. The camera movements look more like steadicam than handheld, and the camera mainly looks straight ahead and tracks sideways, does very little panning, and almost no tilting up to capture ceiling details. Handheld shooting generally behaves very differently from what we see here."
vimanaboy 4 years ago 10
I believe this is not astronauts but haz-mat men working on earth. Some of these structures look like wood, especially at the end. It looks like window frames. The raking at the end it telling. Arson investigation/Hazmat kind of probing? This is not the moon.
stopthewaffle 4 years ago 5
why is the quality so poor? Other lunar footage doesn't look this goofed up. Really detracts from its credibility in my book, unfortunately. That's my opinion.
markaruski 4 years ago
I'm speechless. Whitley Strieber and other ufologists have witnessed flimsy wooden-like materials on many UFOs. Did you notice the butterfly-shaped hyroglyphic on the side of the structure toward the end? When you see one of the astronauts standing underneath it, your heart really does stop! However, it probably IS a training video, but that doesn't explain the poor quality, unless the entire moon landing WAS a hoax!
binkle1 4 years ago
Obvious fake for several reasons.
1. Smooth camera movement. The astronauts found it difficult to walk in the moon's 1/6g gravity. They frequently stumbled and fell, eventually settling on a 'bunny hop' type of movement. The camera in this video is very still, almost like it's on rail.
2. The space suits. The suits do not in any way match the suits worn during Apollo 11.
This is either a training video, a fake, or a reinactment.
XDisk 4 years ago 13
well it's so smooth i dont think anyone on earch can record it that way... and the answer for this is it's probly on a special mount... which can mean fake or real... then again i saw today in discovery channel that a special way is needed to bring film to space in the first place.. or it wont work.. but by the 11th maybe they got it right by then hm...
shadowlesswalls 4 years ago 2
sorry I meant at the 3:53 minute marker.
amishmix 4 years ago
Question....take a look at the segment with the "astronaut" at the 4:53 minute mark. Does any one notice something wierd about the movements of the figure? He goes from leaning far back to leaning forward without moving his feet much. He seems to move in a way that would only be possible under low gravity conditions! It would be hard for any ordinarry people to budget a hoax like that. I think it may be a training video also; but i wish it were true!
amishmix 4 years ago
Looks like the logo at 2:24 has been put onto the film after the original recording. It doesn't look like it's part of the wall, but part of the film at a specific moment. It doesn't stay put on the wall at the same place. Possibly this film has been taped of a video monitor and the logo is part of the monitor.
Zingo33 4 years ago
I wish I could but I only have small portions of it which I ll try to post soon.
NAlexo 4 years ago
WOW.. ive never seen sombody handle a camera like that. SOOOO SMOOOOTH with fantastic decreasing velocity at every turn.. no ups and downs and perfect inertia... FORGET the structure.. this guy has some fantastic camera abilities !
hennytube 4 years ago 12
A fake, probably:
1. the distortions on the film are too homogenous all the way through, look like add-on
2. Think of moving around in a space suit and getting that stable a video in an unknown place. I think Neil would have stopped, filmed, stopped the cam, moved, stopped, filmed instead.
3. No audio - the guy probably would be saying something recognisable or comparable to Neils voice if this was genuine.
TMFAP 4 years ago 4
Two questions;
1. At 2:20 in, in the top left hand corner of the video, there appear to be symbols or numbers of some sort.
2. What is making the noises heard every once in a while?
temujin29 4 years ago
1. local TV station
2. sounds unrelated to the film
NAlexo 4 years ago
If they had a crane or "cherry-picker" then I would say it's possible. Notice the different elevations occurring with the camera. Even with little gravity I'm sure the astronaut couldn't jump that high to get some of those shots.
GhostHalo 4 years ago