Added: 2 years ago
From: footjob56
Views: 342,265
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (452)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It's structural failure !!! 2000 degrees , steel just fails , then oh yeah gravity pulls it down , that's not a normal fire there it's aviation fuel ...

  • this gives you a glimpse of how big this building really is for ppl who have never been and you tall me that this huge sturdy building collapsed bcus of fire?? please!! ive seen worse apartment fires that didnt collapse we know who the real terrorist are the U.S government

  • and fire dropped the twin towers? ...right. Poor people

  • If I ever work in a high rise building, I'll keep a parachute in my office and i'll take a spare one with me everyday. I'll practice base jumping.

  • how helpless :'(

  • omg... incredible...

  • Oh my lord... that's..

  • Comment removed

  • -squints- Oh yea, sure enough. There they were.

  • There all in a better place with no such things as "terrorism" or "racism" or "bullying" don't get me wrong the worlds a great place but when thing's like this happen it turns in to a place where sometimes i dont even wanna be, im just glad there all at peace and dont have to relive these horrific events in there mind TIME AND TIME AGAIN!

  • supposedly the fire was hot enough to weaken steal, but not enough to stop a person made out of flesh and bones and clothes from burning up in secconds.... people need to think

  • @TheCutterschoice Inside moron..the plane tore though the outside of the building, and it ignited inside the building. It was probably extroardinarily hot where these guys were standing, but the real problem was the there was jet fuel burning inside the building, weakening the steel supports.

  • OMG..was more people there waving,i tough was only Edna Cintron...

  • Never knew people could touch metal that was supposedly 2,000 degrees. Somethings up.

  • Hi! I'm waving back, how are you?

  • wtf its was not funny what if u were those people u would be scared and thinking of ur family so get a life it was not FUNNY!

  • Comment removed

  • September 11th is the 254th day of the year: 2 + 5 + 4 =11.

    After September 11th there are 111 days left to the end of the year.

    119 is the area code to Iraq/Iran. 1 + 1 +9 = 11.

    Twin Towers - standing side by side, looks like the number 11.

    The number of stories is 110 (2x) 110 - 110

    Remember that the zero "0" is not a number, so we have 11:11

    The number of Tower windows =21,800 2+1+8+0+0 =11

    The third building #7 to fall had 47 stories =4+7=11

    The first plane to hit the towers was Flight 11

  • @sweetness00peace haha wtf dude, lol

  • @they just chose 911 cause its the emergency number, so that its a easy date to remember. the rest is just a coincedince

  • @admiralPs No they chose 911, because that is the day profit Mohammed was born.

    Also i have over a thousand more 11's for that day. I only posted a few. If you want more, i can show you more.

  • @sweetness00peace Wow why so many "11" s?

  • @kimkrisrich we r not sure

    there are also 1000's more 11 numbers that coincide with sept 11th

    its a sign... im sure it is...

  • @kimkrisrich Because he lied...? Look up the actual numbers he's quoting, most of them are false.

  • @sweetness00peace

    There is no 119 area code

    0 is in fact a number, and holds a value, you can't just omit a place holder from a number so that it suits a theory better.

    There were 43600 windows in the towers

    Building 7 had 52 floors

    Add those all up and what do you get? "You're an idiot". Not a word of a lie, that's what it says on the calculator.

  • those people r throwing gang signs hahahhahha=D

  • watch "blueprint for truth" is you have been living under a rock and dont believe 9/11 was set up

  • i don't understand why a helicopter wasn't sent up to get those people waving at the windows...it coulda been done...why wasn't it?

  • All you reptiles that think this was a conspiracy, ask yourselves a couple of logic questions.....

    It would have needed at least a 100 people to organise, has there ever been a leak?

    Who was to gain? Would American citizens order the murder of 1,000s of fellow American citizens for what? What gain? And how could they get away with it? Conspiracy theories only exist because the gullible buy the books to make some smart guy rich!!

  • who were they waving at?

  • These poor poor people. Murdered so that billions of dollars could be sought for war against a country that did nothing to us. What a shitty way to get richer.

  • This video has Edna Cintron in it. It shows her alive and moving. She would end up burning to death. Later footage shows her standing upright with smoke coming off her. That's the stark reality. People are reverting to the hoax 'option' to try to deny this as having happened. But, unfortunately, this is shit which actually happened. Some are even saying she jumped. If she 'jumped', it was a fall when she was a smouldering dead person.She died standing up, from heat and fire. No doubt whatsoever.

  • I h8 ppl who think their government kills their own ppl as their aim is to protect people right?

  • @bmxncars Just because policy is written doesn’t mean it is obeyed. Next you will tell me everyone in prison is innocent because there are laws.

  • if 9/11 was fake why did muslims celebrate the towers hitting the ground?

  • Please stop spamming conspiracy comments on this. The building wasn't made up to code, which made it more vulnerable. The 3 hours of applied heat from the planes damaged the lighter than normal foundation, which lead to its collapse. No THERMITE PAINT could take it down. Now everybody shut up.

  • The reason for this attack was to install fear and hatred against Muslims. That would ultimately lead to a war in the Middle East. High up people with power wanted there to be a war in the Middle East so that they could profit from the large deposits of oil which we don't have in the U.S.

  • i hope they didnt die and someone had saved them<3

  • My heart breaks for these people.

  • I actually cried...;(

  • Many building fires always come with people waving from them. At the scene there is always sagged, weakened steel, according to firefighters. The fires were hot enough to weaken the steel in these buildings, like the WTC fires. Both scenarios had sagged steel and waving people. Does this mean that the WTC fire was a conspiracy while the other fire wasn't? No. The WTC collapsed because it was only steel, supported by fairly weak floor trusses, and VERY heavy. Once the steel weakened, it fell.

  • @MazJax Jajajajajaja, only the BIGGEST stupid can tell what do you tell!!!!, Man: type on youtube: Demolition goes wrong, and explain to me please how a COCRETE building stops their collapse, and steele bulding like WTC7 collapse at free fall speed. You are a troll!!!!

    And please, ecplain to me the ABSOLUTE IMPOSIBLE Naudet´s video.

  • @Inigo37 Because concrete structures are very solid and blocky whereas steel structures are held together with millions of pieces. Those can easily break apart unlike concrete.

    And it didn't collapse at freefall speed, that's a truther propaganda statement. The interior of the building was gone by the time the outside structure collapsed. Loose Change cut out half the total collapse time.

  • @MazJax Jajajajajaja, yes, the parts of steel structres are held together with bubble gum, that can easily eat by a childrens puts in the towers.

    During 100 feets AT FREE FALL SPEED, but, so what, 187m in 6.5 seconds. WTC7 collapse is a joke.

    The most beautifull explain of the FRAUD of 9/11 is ALL that happen this day, but the Nudet´s video is like win a lotery of 70 combinations in one hand:

    Leslie Raphael. Serendipity.li

  • @Inigo37 Loose Change is a joke, thinking the total collapse took 7 seconds! XD

    The steel bars were held together with 4 inch bolts which can be destroyed easily by a collapsing building. Was the collapsed steel structure of the Windsor Tower held together with bubblegum? I guess it was because otherwise it wouldn't have collapsed, would it? XD

  • @MazJax Did the Windsor tower collapse into its own footprint? NO!

  • @MazJax Collapse of the windsor building? yes? what windsor building man? Windsor building of Madrid (Spain) (my fucking and hated be me country) HAS NEVER COLLAPSED.

    Think on this simple question: when the tower collapse, in a few seconds the upper levels destroys and a big portion of the mass go to the outer side of the building, and the interior debris is no more a big structure, but small debris: ¿what is the mass to press the bottom levels?: NO-THING: collapses STOPS INMEDIATELY.

  • @Inigo37 Yeah you're right, the top steel section of the Windsor Tower didn't collapse, instead it was sent to another dimension by evil Jew magic, just like the WTC right?

    15 floors and more worth of steel pressed down onto the center of the building. Each steel piece weighed as much as a small bus, now imagine the entire top section? It would get totally destroyed no matter what.

  • @MazJax See the videos of the collapse, ok, when the collapses begin, the upper floors is intact like you see, a few seconds after, a big portion of the upper floors broke and fall OUT of the building: ok on this? well, this weigh is totally out of the bottom PERFECT floors, and you can see that the upper floors don´t exist any more, is like free debris: no more a big SOLID press weight: what is the weigth to press the bottom floors and continued the collapse?: collapses STOPS!!!

  • @Inigo37 The bottom and middle of the windsor tower were concrete, which is stronger and is fireproof. But the steel section? Gone.

  • @MazJax Explain to me the Naudet´s videos: Leslie Raphael. This is ABSOLUTE IMPOSIBLE.

    FINISH!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @MazJax lolz that's funny shit, well said

  • @MazJax Concrete stronger than steel? bye, bye.

  • @Inigo37 Yeah it sure is, and water is more flammable than gasoline.

  • @MazJax Bye, bye

  • @Inigo37 Buh bye, babe! ;)

  • So conspiracy theorists say that if there is a woman standing inside the burning WTC tower waving out of the hole (which just so happens to be the coolest, airy part of the building) then it proves there were no fires. It doesn't matter if there is complete proof, eyewitnesses, and photographic evidence of fires.

    So following their logic, it can be concluded that if somebody waves out of any burning building, it automatically means that the building is not on fire.

    Twoofers believe this. ^^^

  • @MazJax I am a conspiracy theorists, or.... ¿? jajajajajaja:

    Leslie Raphael, Serendipity.li

    Sorry for you but in THE REAL WORLD 9/11 WAS A FRAUD.

  • @Inigo37 ...yawn.

  • @Inigo37 a fraud.....why would the government attack its own people for no reason....The timen square incident involved government suppression and thats a no where near what this was, this was plane and obvious

  • @mooyah36 Why would the government attacj its own people FOR NO REASON? hey man!!! I don´t respond to you this STUPID ask. Ok, can you diferenciate betwen posible and imposible? ok, 9/11 was a fraud, I am TO-TA-LLY SURE. I have gad three years of INTENSE investigation on 9/11: is soo phatetic, all things on 9/11 is like a joke. The best is the soo pathetic Naudet´s video: IM-PO-SI-BLE: Leslie Raphael. Serendipity.li

    Wake up man, wake up.

  • Nothing melted. Nothing needed to melt. The floors dropped inside from the warping/expanding steel in the flames. The outer columns were then unsupported for height beyond their capacity. They buckled and failed. Then gravity did the rest. [TEST: get a plastic ruler and press from the ends, Now get someone to hold it at the centre and do the same = Much stronger] No melting, no bombs, no demolition, no idiot theories. Engineering ok. How do I know? I design these buildings for a living.

  • @bigmaxy07

    still a flawed analysis. concrete deck flooring does not bear enough tension to pull down a supporting column. they are designed like this, how this was a deck maybe 8 inches, maybe? on flimsy deck supporting. get it right.

  • @sarahz794 The outer columns weren't pulled down. They were left without lateral support when the floors disconnected from them. Without lateral support they became overloaded for the unsupported length and buckled. As I said before take a ruler and test it for yourself.

  • @bigmaxy07

    tell you what though, if that shit was concrete it wouldn't of gone anywhere for sure. steel is outdated.

  • Concrete to that kind of height is not economical, Nothing of that size is ever done in concrete. Too much weight on the foundations among other drawbacks. Steel is faster, lighter and cheaper, especially in the US.

  • @bigmaxy07 Jajajaja, what a joke oyur explain, the only idiot are you. Can you explain to me this?:

    Leslie Raphael, Serendipity.li

    bye, bye!!!

  • if im correct theyd still be standing if they had recieved one higher grade quality of flame retardant on the steel girders that held up the buildings.

  • That sucks. They had no where to go. Rest in peace. Their final moments had to be the worst. The hope that hey got for being able to look out the hole, but the despair of not being able to simply walk out of the hole. And the helplessness of the rescue teams who could do nothing to assist them. What a rotten way to go. It is sad and enraging at the same time.

  • why is it that Oprah Winfrey has not done a story on this...and invited all of those experts and scientists on her show to discuss the molten metal and the govt cover up? well, see folks, they just pay her too much money to keep her mouth shut.

  • @wakeupamericaful soo true!

  • i agree with someones earlier comment. why is it that most Americans blindly believe whatever bullshit story the 'Government' gives us. just remember, the 'government'....you know, the people in the White House and the people we see on tv....well they are real people too. they still go to sleep at night just like you and me. so dont be afraid of questioning the governments version of events. e.g. if Bill Clinton can go on tv and deny have sex with Monica, and then come back and say 'i lied'????

  • @wakeupamericaful there's a difference between fibbing about a personal affair and making up what happened on 9/11. I've read and watched many documentaries on conspiracy theories about 9/11 with a complete open mind, and in fact was convinced by them there may be a huge rotten conspiracy. But once cross checking the conspiracies with facts, I find the conspiracy theories to all be bogus. Which makes the conspiracy theorists flat out rotten people.

  • a building has a small and i mean SMALL chunk out of the side and tiny bit of smoke coming out like 3 windows and folks say that is enough to melt a building that was built stronger than any of the buildings in downtown new york. yep, sounds logical to me. so if a crane hits one of the skyscrapers here in downtown portland and takes a large chunk out of the side of the building the entire thing may melt into its own footprint? wow! i had no idea. FOLKS ARE IN SUCH DENIAL!

  • I feel sorry for the folks who feel the need to defend a government that is clearly hiding the truth. it is sad. the government has such loyal followers and yet they are shitting all over people. makes me even more angry! investigations following 9/11 should of been the biggest, greatest, most in depth, thourough investigations of all time!!! but no, they acted like they already knew what they needed to know. WTF!? wtc7 was not even included in 9/11 commision report. WOW!!

  • @thebluetarp WTC 7 fell after the fucking planes hit you idiot. thats why it wasn't included. It wasn't because the planes hit it. It was because there was so much structural damage. Of course governments lie to us about a lot of things. However, I doubt even a government would be dumb enough to ram a plane into a building. Hell, one of the worst men alive only burned a building to convince people to follow him.

  • @thebluetarp There is a report on WT7 you fucking morons. Go look. If there is a conspiracy it's YOUR job to PROVE it.

    NIST released several reports. The reason it was later than the other is because the Towers were more of a priority.

    I hate idiots like you.

  • @wtfdudenotcool101 You are correct the NIST did release several lies.

  • @MrTHEORIGINALICEMAN Do you really believe such a vast conspiracy could be so easily hidden?

    If there was proof you'd find it. If there was one person, JUST ONE PERSON who decided it wasn't a good idea or wanted to come out we'd have heard about it as has happened in the past.

    Our economy is in shambles right now and this is the result of this grand master plan to get more oil and start wars?

    You just find what you're looking for instead of whats actually there.

  • @wtfdudenotcool101 There was one person, now she is dead.

  • @c4nea whats sad is that this was done by the american government to gain support from the people to go blow up the rest of the world.... there are very evil people in power and they will do whatever they feel they have to in order to control all the valuable resources on the planet

  • @mikester1200 how bout the fact that a 3rd fucking building which contained many top secret cia documents also collapsed for NO REASON!! if you really buy that debris hitting a sky scraper can make it collapse in 7 seconds, which was free fall speed, then idk what to tell you. for a building to fall at free fall speed there must be no resistance from any of the support beams which were scattered throughout these buildings. or go ahead and search on google "al queda leader dines at pentagon"

  • Looking at the opening video, I am reminded that we have been folled in refering to the holes as "plane shaped"

    The wtc2 hole is comma shaped, not plane shaped and, as I look closely at the opening sequence here, I see the wtc1 hole is also not "plane shaped"

    Boy are we dumb.

  • @ctcole77 every shred of evidence points to the united states government being responsible, if you step foot in any country outside of america you will get laughed at trying to say "alquida" carried out 9/1. hahahaha why did 100% of the building turn to dust when a VERY small portion of either of tower 1 or 2 was damaged? anyone with a brain should realize that a steel structure doesnt abruptly collapse when only a small portion of it was damaged, and tower 7 makes it soooooo obvious lol wake up

  • @hiphopfreak31 just do me one favor if you can find one FACT not speculation that proves 911 was an inside job ill believe you

  • freaky stuff. The hole was supposed to the heart of a raging plane fuel fire that turned steal into molten metal, yet by then the fires were already dying out due to the decernable change in smoke??? so many questions?

  • @qetoun plane fuel burned off in the first 15 minutes. the fire was being fuelled by debris and various objects found in the offices etc. lots of plastic and jet fuel both burn with mass amounts of black smoke. there is no evidence based on the smoke that says the fires were "dying out". and no evidence exists that steel was turned to molten metal...no reports state that it was melted. after being heated for so long it did lose half its strength, in which case it would bend and twist, not melt

  • @c4nea no evidence? what about the scores of eye witnesses and who saw liquid metal and the video of it flowing out of the towers? the vast deposits of solidified slag at the base of the rubble pile? The chemical residue of iron exposed to such extremes of temperature? Also a slow burn hydrocarbon fire cannot create tempures high enough to bend let alone melt steel and certianly not after a few hours. The recreation your described fire only bent steel after over 24 hours of exposure.

  • @qetoun My problem with the conspiracy theory that steel wouldn't melt at those temperatures of burning jet fuel is that the entire building infrastructure was compromised. It didn't need to melt steel, it just had to soften it so not to support the weight of the upper floors. And when you see them collapse, that's what collapses first, is the upper floors. And it doesn't come down nice and neat it topples over at first. The skin of the building held the floors unlike other buildings.

  • @jmitterii2 Valid; and completely explains that WTC 7 collapase as well.

  • I'm going to let out a rage comment cause i find it FUCKING STUPID how the top comments to the 9/11 videos only have 2 thumbs up yet they are always against theorists.

    FUCK YOU YOUTUBE YOU BIASED CUNT..

    now on with my discussion.

  • You're making it too easy. 1. First question is poorly formulated - what do you mean exactly? 2. The head of Pakistani intelligence coordinated recruiting Mohammed Atta and his crew, paid them and this was done with U.S. Intelligence. So these guys were instructed what floors to hit. Question for you/ how do you explain the implosion of WTC 7 - 2 floors burning in a 50 storey building, unhurt by jet fuel AND there were pools of both Thermite and Thermate found at the bottom of WTC 7. Inside job!

  • God, that breaks my heart

  • wow dead man waving that's is sad

  • Anyone who thinks 9/11 was an outside job is a dumbass. Conspiracy theorists can also go to hell. They think there's an alternate explanation to everything... I bet they have an alternate reason as to why we poop. They'd probably blame that one on Bush too.

  • if i ever work in a skyscraper i will make sure to have a parachute in my office just incase

  • HOW DID THE PLANE'S GET TO AMERICA UNOTICED ?

    well atleast whoever was in them plane's died a horrible death

  • @teebaybee123 uhhhhhhhhhhh the planes were flying international flights........ they were IN the United States... Maybe you should do some reading on the attacks... Might help your spelling and grammar as well.

  • @bok666choy yeah i did'nt take notice to this much back then

    i only got interested now & yeah i figured that out

  • @teebaybee123 Please tell us you are trolling because honestly, can anybody be that stupid?

  • @floydfreak63 yeah i figured out what happened .. did'nt really care much but it's interesting

    & don't call me stupid ,

    Clearly AMERICA IS FUCKIN STUPID ..

    that shit would never happen to my beautiful country =)

  • ok people ...#1 investigate the mechanics of a helicopter b4 spreading ur stupidity.......u are just so dumb its tiring....and crebs..seriously ... calm down ... these people are psychotics who will never understand life and the trauma of this day...ignore them....when people say y cant a helicopter go there ....they are stupid they dont understand science and what i takes for air lift.....ignore them...they are DUMB DUMB DUMB

  • if the fire was so hot how can these people crawled thru the impact zone to get to the impact hole to wave for help. what a scam by our government

  • @camaro517 LOL wow you proved it right there!! it mustve been an inside job!! the fire wasnt as hot as they said that must mean Bush blew the towers up right?

  • @ManardGCrebs u dont even realize i was talking about them and agreeing with you.......i was there on this day...i lived it.....its my reality.....i saw what this is showing with my eyes and have never been the same.....please dont write me back....i dont need it ...as for everybody and their ridiculous theories...get some celebrex or whatever help you need and get over your paramoia you sound like psychotics and traitors

    .....

  • @ManardGCrebs because they are traitors and cowards..who prior to 3 generations ago would have been put against a wall and had theirs heads blown off...but now... we're stuck having to hear the little annoying birds chirp all the time

  • Answers anyone can figure out:1) charges are planted all over the building in spots to weaken the super structure, 2)" Something" did hit the buildings, laden with explosives, but the nano inside was a separate synced charge series to blast after the impacts, and 3) if the confession was before 2001, it would have some plausability. I can claim credit after the fact. Additionally, there's always a "fall guy" set up to carry out the plan, but not for the true reason. Here: Surrender of Liberty!

  • @ManardGCrebs

    The Bush family has been partners with Osama Bin Laden since long time ago before 9/11, and this is a FACT. you can google it. No one is saying that only the government did this. They partnered with Alqaida to do this, each benefiting from it on their side

  • @c4nea  btwww

  • do some research? lol k well first you should go look up what temperature it takes that kinda steal to MELT.. then think about the fact that the people in this video...ARE FUCKING SITTING ON IT? not even a little "wtf is going on here"?... wow get the fuck outta the little box half your heads are stuck in.

  • did anyone died?

  • You cant take a helicopter up there as the blades of the chopper would hit the sides of the building. It is not doable. The chopper could go up...but then wouldnt be able to get close enough to get the people. Anyone understand what I mean?

  • Hes doing remarkably well considering the fires burnt for less than an hour and reached a blistering 1000 degrees or whatever hot enough to bend steel. or so if you take the official report seriously.

    What about all that molten metal pouring out in other videos.?

    Theres is cleaerl;y no general high temperature that would be conducted away by the steel anyway but the official report says it does the official report is total rubbish.

  • So thats the fire that was hot enough to bend all that steel?

    The official story is poppycock,

    lies and utter rubbish.

  • @zenoist2 yea im sure the huge aircraft that just blasted out half the building and left that huge hole didnt weaken it or anything...its been the same argument for 10 years move on already. who cares about the melting point. they flew a fucking plane into a building!! its not going to stay up for long!

  • @c4nea Are you fucking retarded?? do some research and LEARN what those buildings were made of designed for and what situations it could survive!! those buildings show be up today!

    Loose Change <-- type it in, watch it learn!!

  • @CharlieBorrows is loose change the only thing that anyone ever uses for arguments? maybe you should do some research and get more than one opinion.

  • @c4nea Because steel infrastructure buildings haven't lasted 6+ hours on fire..

    lost a whole story/collapse and still be standing..

    etc.

    It was a JAASM missile they flew into the building,

    they computer generated imagery of planes over that missile,

    which is why you can notice different plane colors/plane flight path differences/science errors during 9/11.

    Don't be an ignorant cunt,

    don't question only having oil for cars,

    cheaper 2b guilty than innocent,

    cheaper 2die than health benefits.

  • @GolfingThurnis haha some people will believe anything. you sir, are a moron. me the ignorant cunt?? take a look in the mirror you gullible piece of shit. people like you are so easy to sway one way or the other, and you latch on to one side so easy, its not even worth it to try and argue a topic. guaranteed you have about 3 main points to throw around. and youll throw them around as FACT when they arent backed by anything except some fat idiot sitting in his basement making a 911 website.

  • @c4nea Frank DeMartini, clearly said the buildings were made to withstand multiple hits from fully loaded 707's. Why was there no resistance below the collapse points? Newton's Laws clearly tell us that every action has a reaction. Where was the reaction from the secure buildings below the collapse points? There was NONE, so what took away the secure building below the collapse points? Or was it just a coincidence that this happened 3 times on the same day?

  • @blite13 actually the buildings were meant to take a hit from 1 707 that was in emergency landing scenario. which means low fuel and only travelling at 200mph. not a 757 with a full tank flying at 500mph. and maybe the top 1/4 of the building (approx125000 tonnes) falling on top of the rest of it is what brought the towers down. its simple. im not arguing the fact that it wasnt simply terrorists attacking, im arguing that it WAS as simple as whoever planned it flew 2 planes into the buildings

  • @c4nea LIAR, I have the clip of DeMartini telling it, he said a fully loaded, multiple hits. No resistance from below the collapse point means something took away the resistance, otherwise collapse times would have been longer or the top of collapse falls to LEAST resistance = simple. For the rest of your comment, it makes no sense. But that's what a sockpuppet does when hit with an argument they cannot refute. They write some nonsensical comment to try to deflect and confuse.

  • my comment makes no sense. and some outrageous scheme that included millions of variables and details to be covered makes perfect sense. some of you have your eyes way too open. who do you think you are calling me a sock puppet..all you "theorists" think you are of some higher being, you act as if you are above everyone who thinks differently than you. just because i have a different opinion about some stupid event that happened 10 years ago, does not make me a "slave to the man". grow up

  • @c4nea Some stupid event? That is a very stupid comment, shows your character = poor.

  • @blite13 no i think people just need to get over it.

  • @c4nea people will "get over it" when the truth comes out. Allowing the criminals to get away with these crimes is debilitating to humanity. You can just watch the tv and not even think of it, why are you here?

  • @blite13 i find it funny that Americans are fine with blowing up the rest of the world, yet when it happens to them its the worst tragedy in history and everyone needs to argue about it for the next 50 years...

  • @c4nea 9/11 is the core of what the movement should be about, that and to end the fed. When the truth clearly shows that the 'official' story is a lie and the masses finally realize it, this will be the key to the end of the 'white collar criminals' and their deception and manipulation. 9/11 is the key to that, this is why it is so important, that it must be kept in the forefront, it cannot be forgotten and pretend that it never really happened. Once the people lay down, that's it, the game is..

  • @blite13 the only story thats a lie is that some evil mastermind came up with this plan halfway around the world. although thats easier to believe than some of these brutal theories ive heard. the fact is, it was an obvious plan by some bigwigs high above george retard bush, and it WAS as simple as flying planes into buildings and hoping for the best. if you actually look at the other side of the argument instead of using other peoples arguments against it you might see some new angles. cheers

  • @blite13 show me the clip.

  • @c4nea what clip?

  • @blite13 "I have the clip of DeMartini telling it"...

    That clip, lets see it

  • Yet the claim is that this oxygen starved fire, was so hot below the impact area, that it softened the steel all the way to the ground "including the core" and burned longer than the nuclear fire at Chernobyl, yet people made their way to the opening, thinking, and hoping that helicopters would come to rescue them.

    This is video proof, that the official cause of the collapse, as stated by NIST is a lie.

    This NIST Lie is exposed by Patriot Engineers.

    /watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ

  • @konner69 and thats that!! leaders of the USA should be ashamed of themselves! and also mr Silverstein!! 7.1 billion dollar??

  • why didnt the national guard or army react fast enough so as to get a helecoptor, quickly ride up beside the building and rescue people?

  • @teresaunseen

    I´ve got the same question...I don´t understand why...!!!

  • @teresaunseen How could they get close enough to rescue them without being covered in smoke or slamming into the building?

  • @teresaunseen Impossible =/ The heli would have risked its rotors striking debris and outlying surfaces surrounding the hole. I'm not sure if they could have made a landing on the top of the towers and made rescue efforts from there, but I'm sure the risk of smoke inhalation would have ruled out the possibility of victims escaping to higher levels of the tower, as heat and smoke do naturally rise =/

  • @teresaunseen What would they do? Fly a helicopter a few feet away from a burning building with that much smoke? And they could not see anybody at the time.

  • @teresaunseen this aint a movie. how the hell would you even expect that to work.

  • @teresaunseen its simple, they caused this whole thing they couldve reacted fast enough to save those ppl but just like hurricane katrina, they purposely took their sweet ass time

  • @teresaunseen I've always wondered that too?

  • @teresaunseen because the smoke from the buildings was too thick Choppers coulnt even land on the roof

  • @teresaunseen the physics of such an attempt would just result in more losses.