Added: 5 years ago
From: MikePukin
Views: 54,677
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (368)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WHAT A GREAT MAN! WHAT A GREAT PRIME MINISTER TONY BLAIR WAS!!!!!!!!

  • Lets be honest Tony the only reason you stood by Bush was for the natural resources in Iraq. No WMD

  • @bugzak47 You are so fucking stupid. Seriously. Please tell me WHAT NATURAL RESOURCES we have taken from Iraq!? ZERO! Were now OUT of that Country and we took NO OIL!

    Stop trying to use that as an excuse! There was some BAD intelligence that said WITHOUT A DOUBT that Iraq had WMD... And they very likely DID but we didn't get there quick enough before they shipped them off to Syria! That is why we went to war! Not OIL.

  • @scott71785 okay

  • OF COURSE WE WILL HAVE TERRORISM HERE, BLAIR FLOODED THIS COUNTRY WITH ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND BLAIR DID NOTHING TO STOP IT. HE SAID HE KNEW NOTHING ABOUT OUR BORDER CONTROLS!! STUPID, WEAK

    PRIME MINISTER. GOOD AT BULL SHITTING AND NO GOOD AT DOING THE

    JOB HE WAS PAID FOR. MORE MILLION POUND HOUSES, NOW THAT'S IMPORTANT TO HIM AND HIS REVOLTING WIFE...WHO ALSO WEARS THE TROUSERS. SO MRS BLAIRS HAS RUN OUR COUNTRY. DOES SHE HAVE THE IMMIGRANTS AS NEIGHBOURS - OH NO! NOT IN MY BACK YARD!

  • @athinalee IF IN DOUBT TYPE IN BLOCK CAPITALS! THAT WAY PEOPLE CAN SEE THAT YOU ARE RIGHT AND THEY ARE WRONG!!!

  • if ever there was a speech about the new world order and false flag operations, this is it. fucking scary stuff. notice how what he says here is a justification of what they do. killing innocent people in the name of oligarchical democracies. how many more have to die so that they can control the world? but thanks for posting this - i will use it. this will not go unvalued.

  • @ur7maa You are sad

  • Dubya sounded like such a Texan. But it was one of those times where he was inspired and sincere.

    Now that I know about Islamofascism - I think Bush was right. Oww... It's burns, it burns!!

    Tony was so much erudite in his case (compared to Dubya) and that helped our resolve considerably here in America.

    Let us not forget Tony Blair. Let us not forget our cultural heritage. Why did our ancestors leave their homelands? A thousand reasons. But mainly to live under a system of English law.

  • red white and blue the colors of great britain and the usa we both speek english we both have the same vews we are cusans frends aliys and will stand strong together agenst all our enermys

  • I wish he was our president.

  • 'Blair makes the case against terroism'!!?? Thats like 'making the case against shooting puppies'. Both bush and bliar are strangers to the truth.

  • We in the UK don't deserve a man of his greatness? And you do because what? You are a yank? You live in the richest country on earth? You can have Tony Blair, cause if anything the UK deserves better. He is a war mongering dick and deserves the same fate as Saddam Hussien.

  • @Vogterzmom Hear hear. Hes a traitor. Saddam Hussein undoubtedly deserved to be ousted but not by us and certainly not by the worlds most recent imperial power. Forcing democracy on others is nothing more than vanity and propagates violence.

  • I support the war and proud to.

  • Blair was an idiot who failed to deliver after 10 years. He was a joke in the UK and left just when the banks went bust, he would have been slaughtered if he had stayed.

  • i want to like blair, he gives a good speech and at first impression you could consider him to be a likable person. however i cant help but hate him for what he and his party have done to my country. his policies at home and abroad bankrupted britain and it will be years, decades, before we recover. we could have stayed close to the usa without joining them in a war which they were perfectly capable of fighting alone, costing us money and irreplacable soldiers, with nothing to show for it.

  • Blair is a murderous war criminal. End of.

  • @youknowsit45 66 British citizens were murdered on 9/11, he responded. He is not a murderer, he confronted Islamic extremism.

  • @mj2w1 Is that the same 11/9 that had nothing whatsoever to do with Iraq?

  • @mj2w1

    How is 9/11 in any way related to the Iraq War? If we wanted to respond to the 9/11 attacks we would've invaded Saudi Arabia, but even then, it was extremists, not a country.

  • @cmwissy When did I say it was related? The point I was conveying was about the wider picture of the war on terror. So you're aware, Britain pulled out of the Iraq War many years before the United States did. Afghanistan was always the UK focus on counterinsurgency.

  • @youknowsit45 And Winston Churchill... isnt?

  • @youknowsit45 But hes not... He has information coming into him, reports etc... intellignece etc saying that their were bioligical weapons etc in iraq and they (saddam) were prepared to use them on the west (allready used them on their people- mass killings etc)....Now cause hes the top guy the one who makes this final decision he weighs up the evidence and says we must go to war on the basis on the info given to him.....If u was leader would u take the chance of not going to war when the .....

  • @youknowsit45 ......... when the evidence suggests that they had them..... How was any of this his fault? In the end of day he had to make a desicion whether to go or not.... and he said he would go along with many other nations... the electorate or Britain agreed with him at the time it was the right decision as he was elected into power again....so had the support of the nation... So how is he a murderous war criminal???????

  • I am in possession of authentic testimony of two Gypsies (under the oat) who are the closest relatives of Tony Blair(from father side), his father was originally from Paris and was a beggar,later in service of Sir James McKinney he advanced to the rank of stable-boy,mother was in same service as a maid, Sir James immediately notice witty boy Tony Blair,who worked as a poulterer,and took care of his education.

  • if only he could have planned the war as good as he could excuse it, maybe he wouldnt need his multi million pound job as a middle east envoy because it wasnt broke.

  • some people here in unit 19 saying leave this case to take what ever will take but the minimum will take until year 2014, they like this criminal Steve torturing me and killing me by the radiation, until 2014 I am in a hell and I need help from around the world, call the Australian government now to see what hell they are doing, they discriminate me because i am from the middle east, of course they will never do anything like this with any australian people, help me read the attached email

  • The time has come for us people in the West to lay down our arms and finally recognise that every single one of us is made of the same substance and we are all sharing the same planet. 'A species that is at war with itself is doomed to fail.' A new hope has come. The Empire has fallen.

  • Those who want to impose freedom on others do not have the slightest idea what freedom means. And those who believe we in the West are free are also highly deluded. No, what is happening here is a new Empire that wants to expand its dictatorship on the disguise of freedom and democracy. We are little more than cattle in these people's eyes. More and more are constantly waking up to this fact, but many have gotten so attached to the system that they will fight to protect it, as is happening now.

  • Now the crucial issue is,what is the motivation of Tony Blair to lie British nation and to wage a criminal occupation and war,no doubt in my mind this is the personality of Tony Blair,impoverish personality of perfect parvenu,who is lead by idea of grandeur to become a legend,but he has forgotten that British people has long history and tradition of democracy,justice,humanity and dignity.We stood together in Nuremberg against tyranny,we will stood again.Long live Great Britain.

  • The Talibans were asked to hand over that Osama dickhead they didn't. War started in Afghanistan which ended very fast. Now they are killing each other. Same thing in Iraq. I mean Bush or Tony did not go and pay these idiots to blow themself up. It is them. It is their hate that they have for each other for so many years. It was Saddam who made his people hate each other. I would love to see Tony once again in UK as a prime minister because he is a great leader.

  • Man Tony knows how to speak. Everytime I listen to him it makes me understand that UK will never have a prime minister like Tony anymore in the future. Look there are those who hate him for the war in Iraq or Afghanistan but what should he have done? Some say that 9/11 was an inside job etc. It can be but again Tony Blair stood with USA and I think it was right. By the way Iraq or Afganistan were not attacked like that. Saddam was asked to leave the country but he did not.

  • Atleast Blair made some valid points of reason and reaction.Whereas bush just babbled a few sound bites in his basic english. This whole 'drama' will be seen by history as the western world's last embarrassing major colaboration with America.

    Democracy,fairness and harmony will no longer be dictated by a fanatical religion, or by 'actors'. The world needs to realise that no human is more worthy than its neighbour..only then will all this crap stop.

  • War criminals biggin' each other up. This is our 'freedom' lol.

  • @BlairSupporter also I've found out you will never be able to get those in the US/UK who disagreed with the war to look at the fact we removed a genocidal madman in Saddam who history proves. All they have to say is that Bush/Blair are war criminals and Nazis. They the anti-war protestors are the sickest most deranged group of people I've ever seen.

  • @Jbroks86 - Absolutely right. The "war criminal/liar" yellers are horrifyingly stupid. Here in Britain the Labour party AND the Lib Dems (the anti-Iraq war LDs are now in coalition government with the Tories) USED to pride themselves on being the so-called "internationalist" parties. Neither of those parties clearly had any idea that the word "international" had anything to do with HELPING others internationally. As I said - STUPID.

  • @BlairSupporter Yeah Clegg, Charles Kennedy, and the chap before him I forgot were even worse on understanding international means that.

  • @BlairSupporter Most of us do not support the LIB/LAB/CON we are non-interventionist!

    Vote UKIP!

  • Ah Tony Blair the man only went to an illegal war because "God told him too" if you don't believe me look it up on youtube :)

  • @121max what because Youtube told you so its right. Your the man who believed Neil Armstrong didnt land on the moon either

  • @121max - As with most of the anti-Blair rubbish spewers and ignoramouses, you're wrong. Blair referred to God only once & this was after the invasion. On the Parkinson show he said "judgements are made by other people, and if you believe in God, by God." Not arrogant. Not saying he prayed to ask God. How do YOU think you know better than him? (Btw, if he believes in God I should imagine he WOUD have prayed) That doesn't mean he thinks God told him to do it. That only means he prayed for wisdom.

  • i pretty much agree with blair except he doesn't seem to take into account that this evil ideology he mentions is probably caused by us in the first place the west does act like we are the moral high guardians of the world but in reality we are most responsible for messing up the world what we the west should do is fix our own countries ie our own poverty and degradation of society then others will aim to copy this. cause regardless of race/religion/sociall status we all just want peace

  • THis American admires Tony Blair. It's hard for any man or woman to lead in a confusing multicultural world of endless lies sleeping with endless truths. Bush certainly did not have much ability to speak publicly , but Blair does and did. I have nothing but respect for TonyBlair.

  • @robi2000 - and as a Brit my admiration for Blair increases the more I read such ignorant nonsense by so many of his opponents. Talk about the enemy within!

  • Blair was a much better communicator than Bush.

  • Hate or love Blair, I honestly love the man for his honesty and realization that people like Saddam needed to be removed, that Iran is a threat, and understands the world. You in the UK, dont deserve someone of Blair's greatness, I gladly take him in our country as a politican or even President over Obama. At least he wouldnt sell out our allies like Obama did.

  • @Jbroks86 Not at all he was a brilliant PM and i wish he had got president of EU

  • @mattyreynolds1990 yeah just a dumb PM who got elect PM 3 times. I love listening to Brits. You guys in the 90s thought Blair was the best thing ever and were telling the whole world how great he was and even as late as 01-02. Now you are hypocrites took over by the Milliband left wing UNITE crazies. Or if Tory, you seem to forget Cameron voted for Iraq too but doesnt get the attack Blair does, b/c a lot of British are hypocrities.

  • @Jbroks86 - it's not so much being "hypocritical", it's more that they have been brainwashed into thinking that Blair went into Iraq for his OWN ends, and nothing to do with any nobler purpose. The extremely mad press in this country is largely to blame for this. The Guardian on the Left - full of the "disappointed". And the Daily Mail on the right, who supported his Iraq decision, have never forgiven him for beating the Tories THREE times. Also, they both fail to join the correct dots.

  • @Jbroks86 When did I call him dumb? He was a good PM he just attached himself to retarded American presidents. His speech in Chicago 1995 shows he could handle himself quite well in the job of president of the USA. He made good decisions and made bad ones but he is man enough to stand up and say if he was wrong but also man enough to admit if he believes he made the right choices. He was a better PM than brown and Cameron will probably not be as good either.

  • @Jbroks86

    And this is coming from a guy who lives in a country who elected Bush into power twice, so what does that say about the American people? Why would Cameron be under fire for Iraq, he wasn't leading the country at the time. It's like saying (I mean I don't know if she did) why isn't Sarah Palin getting flak for it. Because Bush was the one that pushed it. Cameron is instead under fire for being a completely shit prime minister.

  • @TheDarkFrontier You are smart in an idiotic way, dumbass

  • @amc987654321

    And you are just a typical youtube troll. Don't bother constructing a cohesive counter-argument, just stamp your feet on the floor and insult people directly, because you either can't be bothered, or don't have the capacity to come up with a counter argument. And it seems I'm not the only one you're doing that to. Fuck off and troll somewhere else.

  • @TheDarkFrontier Okay. We voted Bush in. We also voted Obama in and he's f'd up even more. What's your point? Yea, Americans are fucking retarded, I'll agree with that. And we are suffering for our corruption. I guarantee whereever you are from is corrupt too though.

  • @FavreianVengeance

    Oh, absolutely, I wasn't even attempting to insinuate in any way that the U.K. isn't corrupted. The U.K. is most definitely in the Top 5 most corrupted countries in Europe.

  • @TheDarkFrontier Hmmm. UK is pretty corrupt particularly in their domestic policies IMO. But I'd be they're not top 5. In fact it seems bad b/c it is. But UK and USA are sadly middle of the road at worst when it comes to corruption.

  • @FavreianVengeance

    Domestic policies at the moment seem to be non-existent. Cameron and his party seem to be more focused on their own self-image and glory rather than actually leading the country.

  • @TheDarkFrontier I liked Blair's rhetoric, but his corruption seems to be another story. I'm not an expert on British politics. What examples of Cameron being bad do you have?

  • @FavreianVengeance

    Massive cuts in the public sector - 16,000 police officers are going to be axed.

    £9K ceiling limit for University Tuition Fees, as opposed to £3K now.

    Privatisation of the NHS, which means no free health care.

    Refusal to tax the rich, and making cuts which will affect the poorest of our society.

    In short, hes for the rich, and wants to grind the working class beneath his heels.

  • @TheDarkFrontier Is 16,000 police offers getting cut that big of a deal? Police officers are vastly over-rated. They have bloated pensions and they're often just harassing people or setting up petty crime stings to put thugs into bloated prison and court systems. My car stereo was stolen. All's the police officer did was come fill out a form and say have a nice day. Even if that stereo gets recovered they're not going to put 2 and 2 together and return it lol.

  • @FavreianVengeance

    Given we've just had mass riots that destroyed a significant part of London's suburbs, and had the threat of spreading to other parts of the country, yeah its a pretty big deal. I agree the system the Police work under is lazy and far too laxed in the face of crime, but if there are 16,000 less officers to deal with riots, that is a pretty big deal.

  • @TheDarkFrontier That's just a matter of inefficiency. Bring the officers in from the suburbs or the army reserves who aren't doing shit. I wouldn't justify keeping high numbers of officers b/c the electorate wants to be disorderly and throw tantrum. Shit, even if they smash a few windows and roll a few cars, the cost is still way less.

  • @FavreianVengeance

    It's far easier said than done to just "bring in army reserves". Though during the riots in London, the Police were beset with difficulties because of the politicians, such as using water cannons, tear gas and baton rounds. If they'd have used them to begin with, the riots wouldn't have gone on for as long as they did.

  • @TheDarkFrontier Its not difficult at all with technology being what it is to have reserves prepared for riots. The truth about police officers and teachers is that they are tools in the hands of politicians. They use 'cuts' as examples of futility when often the futility is to be over funding inept systems. Think of how much you pay in taxes for education and protection. Imagine having all of that money back and funding your own education and being responsible largely for your own protection.

  • @Jbroks86 the "heir to b.LIAR" is also a traitor but he did not start the illegal war

    b.LIAR is more interested in his personal wealth than he is with the good of Britain that's why he sold our country to the EU as if she was a whore.

  • @MrGilles1990 neither Cameron or Clegg have done anything to take you out of the EU. Cameron even broke his promise on Libson. Dont lie out ur ***. If Blair was so unpopular as you called Bush as that Stupid Cowboy, wondered why Blair was PM 4x and Bush reelected in 04, pls keep the public is stupid and conspiracy theories out of it. Otherwise go talk on the crazies forum

  • @Jbroks86 - well Blair was PM three consecutive times, though that was unprecedented for the Labour party. If he had been PM still in the 2010 election, and Gordon Brown hadn't dirtied the waters, he'd STILL be PM, imho. I have a post at my blog on how long it took to find a winner like Blair after the previous one ( Harold Wilson in 1964 when Blair was 10 years old.) It took 33 years to find their winner, Blair. What idiots they are in Labour! What absolute idiots to throw away his abilities.

  • @BlairSupporter yeah I agree he would torn Clegg and Cameron to shreds. It would been a debate I love to seen. I will never forget the ease he easily debated and destroyed Major's arguments making his party losing confidence in him. My biggest regret is that he did not stay on and gave it Brown, who always wanted to bring Blair down and IMO Brown and his crew was jealous of Blair.

  • @Jbroks86 - they were clearly jealous of him and his ability. But it was more than that. Brown, since 1994, felt cheated out of the Labour party leadership which Blair won (Brown didn't stand against him, as it was clear at that time that Blair would beat him.) But Brown always thought it should have been HIS job. If he had got it, Labour would still have won in 1997, but 2001? Or 2005? Blair couldn't stay on any longer, sadly. The knives were out and hitting home. He is only human in the end.

  • @BlairSupporter Yeah the knives on the Tory side would been out for Major by 2001. Probably been Hague, IDS, or Clarke. As for Blair, yeah sadly the blood was out for him by the end. Brown BTW showed why he was a failure, never elected PM, killed in 2010, a backbencher who rarely shows up from what I hear in Westminster, I've never liked Brown.

  • @Jbroks86 Blair got into power through lies and deceit, Bush got into power by the American people, and we all know how clever the yanks are!

    Blair left at the right time for him, it was Brown who got all the stick for bLAIR's national sabotage. I'm a UKIP voter i do not vote for the Lib/Lab/Con.

    I hate Blair V2(David Cameron) and i hate the original.

    I'm a British Right winger who does not like being lied to!

  • @MrGilles1990

    hear hear, I am also a UKIP voter, and it pains me that in every election, the same old crap are voted in, and things get even worse in Britain. Blair over ran us with Muslims, Brown chucked us in a major recesion, and Cameron has taken away our armed forces and killed the NHS. Whats next?, Britain a muslim nation. Its time to stand up and say what were all thinking. Vote someone in that can run a country, and is proud to stand up for whats right for Britain and its native people

  • @MrGilles1990 Yeah we're very smart. Thanks Mate! You say we're smart but yet the British people voted for Blair twice as well. You Git. PS I also support UKIP.

  • @TheIceman567 it's quite a different system in the UK, even if you hate the leader of the party but you like the MP in your constituency you would vote for the candidate not the leader.

    We have something called first past the post, which makes our system so. I'm all for proportional representation!

  • @MrGilles1990 But you still know who the leader would be. That's just stupid.

  • @TheIceman567 yeah i know it's a stupid system, we might get a referendum on it though.

  • @Jbroks86 I greatly agree with you. I hated it when I watched the rest of Britain turn against Blair over the Iraq War. He was a great leader, and although I don't support his party, he was and always will be, the greatest PM we will ever have. I only hope, that our two nations will ever be such strong allies again as we were under Bush and Blair.

  • @FowardUntoDawn13 Thank you, I hated those times and hope there over for good. Also BTW, from your avatar it shows your a member of UKIP, I'm a big fan of Nigel Farage. He's one of few left in the UK left now not mad and understands how the EU is raping Europe along with another one I like Hannan. Now it the opposite of the Blair years, Ed Milliband scares the hell out of me.

  • @Jbroks86 It's great to finally meet someone else with a bit of common sense, especially seeing that there are so few of us left in the world. What the West needs is more people like you and me and less pacifist liberal assholes handing out goddamn human rights over to European oligarchs and the French. I salute you sir.

  • @FowardUntoDawn13 yeah I know, the EU is corrupt robbing its nation states cleaned, not what the Allies fought for. As for France, look at Chirac bought numerous amounts of oil from Iraq and was PM when they sold them the Osirak nuclear reactor. And Schroder of Germany, the other corrupt one was paid off by a high paid job with Gazprom. I hope their is change in Europe and esp the UK. It saddens me to see what happened to Thatcher's great achievements

  • @FowardUntoDawn13 Tony Blair a good PM?

    You utter, utter moron.

  • @stig781 Either say something worthwhile or be quiet. Don't call me a 'moron' you perpetulant little child just for having a different opinion to you. Now please be quiet before you embarass yourself any further.

  • @FowardUntoDawn13 BLAIR IS THE WORST PM EVER. BUSH IS ONE OF THE WORST PRESIDENTS USA EVER HAD. MAYBE NOT WORST, BUT ONE OF THE WORST. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT DID BUSH EVER DO THAT WAS GOOD? START A WAR ON FALSE PRETENSES? INCREASE NATIONAL DEBT? RUIN ECONOMY? STEAL OIL? CONTINUE MCCARTHYISM BY REPLACING COMMUNISM WITH TERRORISM? SIGN PATRIOT ACT? THAT ALL IS VERY VERY BAD AND HE IS A VERY EVIL OR JUST STUPID PERSON HIS AND HIS DADDY'S 5 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES RUINED USA ASWELl ALL IN ALL HE SUCKS!
  • @Jbroks86 - pity you can't alter your constitution. Blair is a man still wanting to be at the centre of politics. He said so recently, saying he is still a "public servant". And this is a world badly in need of real leadership. As things stand it'll be coming from other quarters if we're not careful. And from people we'd prefer NOT to lead the world. People who have no time for democracy, inclusiveness or human rights. But that's what the rabid Left want, it seems.

  • @Jbroks86 Hes a traitor who sold our countrys rich culture and history to foreigners and to his american masters, he burnt the honour of the British armed forces in the incinerator of the Iraq disaster to please his american masters. He his hated and reviled by all decent British subjects and decent people the the world over. He should go on trial for treason and illegal warfare. TONY BLAIR IS A TRAITOR!

  • @grimblebrumble17889 So Britons are only decent if they conform to you're idea's about Blair. Maybe you should take a look at you're level of ideology.

  • @useraaron321 The man is a liar, a murderer, a thief, a war criminal and a traitor. He has only ever acted in the interests of his American masters. He needs to answer for his crimes and be executed as Hussein was.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 You're entirely welcome to you're own opinion but you're implying if people dont agree with you then they are not decent. I'm a British man and I happen to like Blair. Opinions vary of course. People call him a liar but really what did he lie about? And where is you're proof?

  • @useraaron321 He lied about WMDs. He lies about Serbian policing actions. He lied about Iraqi insurgents. He lied about the "threat" of terrorism. He lied and because of it hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis lost their lives, millions more were maimed, and millions made homeless. Hundreds of British soldiers lost their lives. And he made us a target of retaliation by becoming involved in an illegal war.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 He lied about the threat of terrorism, what about 7/7? Where has he lied about insurgents in Iraq? And how do you know that he lied about WMD's? You still haven't given me any evidence to back you're theory.

  • @useraaron321 He said there were WMDs and there was not. You find the evidence its only a type away. And 7/7 is what we get for starting a war in Iraq. If you dont want to be attacked then its a good idea not to attack a country unprovoked, with a premise based on false claims and lies, killing hundred of thousands of innocents. And the Iraqi "insurgents" are men fighting an illegal invasion and a corrupt puppet government. We would do the same as them to free our country.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @grimblebrumble Sorry I missed the bit where you explained 7/7 wasn't done by terrorists! Does this mean that u classify those people as legitimate targets? Again u haven't supplied evidence that he was lying about WMD's. I didn't ask if they found them of not, I asked u to prove he knew! Definition of lying; "a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive" just in case u couldn't type! & regarding insurgents, I wouldn't blow up my own people to get my political point across thanks

  • @useraaron321 He said they definitely had them! Read his own fucking words. And as I said, 7/7 was retaliation for the Iraqis and Afghans weve killed. No you would just lay down and allow a foreign enemy butcher your people and steal your countries resources. Another moral and physical coward.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 If there such a so called 'puppet' government then why did INM take three million voters, 25% of the vote from 7000 candidates. Are they our choice or the Iraqi's? And I think if you do a bit of research you will find that around 85% of Iraqi's wanted an end to the insurgency and claimed if they wanted to make a political point they should run for an election. Which they wouldn't have won coz they are not nice people and kill others because they don't agree with them.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 Tony decide to make it up about WMD's? WHERE IS YOU'RE PROOF? He had intelligence and he made a judgment to go in based on the information he had. If or not you agree with that judgment is another matter. Or maybe you should question the intel he was given! Again the definition of lying, learn it! I don't like the war in Iraq either but I'm not in his shoes making that indescribable decision torn between our and other countries security and war in Iraq. And neither are you!

  • @grimblebrumble17889 Are you another one that claims that we stole Oil? You're a bloody fool! Where is you're proof? See you all have these accusations and badly constructed information. There is more proof to suggest otherwise.

  • @useraaron321 Well we didnt go for the fucking WMDs now did we? We didnt go to liberate the Iraqis. We went to take control of the worlds 2nd largest oil reserve. And guess what? The 1st largest oil supply is right next door. In Iran and guess whos next door to Iran. Fucking Afghanistan. If we went to help the Iraqis why did it take 40 fucking years to do something about it? Other than the dollar losing value.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 So that's you're evidence then. Next time they should use you to solve all of the worlds cases. You're so smart, I cant believe I didn't see that its the worlds largest oil region. There's only one explanation for the war. Flipping unbelievable. I'm done with you. I don't do ignorant people! You obviously have no Idea what company's won trading bids with the Iraqi oil authority's. You are speaking out of assumptions. If you gave me valid evidence I would listen. Enough said

  • @grimblebrumble17889 And one last thing 3000 innocent people did not die 40 years ago! Read finchy633's comment I think you could learn a thing or two from him.

  • @useraaron321 Oh of course. Your one of those fucking dingbats that thinks Saddam had something to do with 9/11. Your an even bigger cunt than I first thought. lol

  • @grimblebrumble17889 Dingbat? Ok then! you're up to you're usual detective work again based on assumptions. Well guess what? No I don't assume a connection between 9/11 and Saddam. I don't even know why or what made you assume that. You've been a grade A shitcunt right from the start!

  • @useraaron321 Fuck off you santimonious cunt. Its fucking naive fools like you what allow the likes of blair and bush to ride rough shod over us and the iraqis. Another naive little boy who falls into line like a good little citizen. Go back to wanking off over your blair propagande you foolish twat.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 santimonious cunt? Um right then! Sounds like i might have upset u're sensabillitys, opps! There's a pattern arising hear. When u can't answer a question u just make asumptions, when u're asumptions are wrong u just call people names & claim u're better than them. I wank over xnxx or xhampster thanks & i like birds with big asses. I'm also a wisker away of beeing a soldier in the TA and i'll be helping while shits like u sit on u're ass & criticise me for being a pussy.

  • @useraaron321 Ooooohhhhh the TA?!?!!? Fucking hell, looks like I better quake in my boots eh? The T? Fuck off you pathetic cunt. The TA thats a funny fucking joke. Maybe you can murder some unarmed brown folks if your lucky eh?

  • @grimblebrumble17889 This is a copy of a text I read from a book called An Ordinary Soldier. Its the last paragraph from a section describing how British soldiers where handed over a secure position about fore kilometers into Iraq. Established by the Americans as they rolled in ahead of them. Supposed to be up and running with complete with wire, prefab watch-towers ect. When they turned up they found 400 enemy soldiers standing in a concrete car park. not fully searched either.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 Amongst them was a group of wounded who had received no medical attention. The British Officer Doug Beattie Walked over to an an American Officer and got the reply: "Ah, there you are, at last. Its all yours. We're off." There is much more to do with this story but I would like to copy in the following: I was a tense period. I understood why my mens frustrations might easily boil over; the heat and physical exhaustion, the real danger, the imagined danger.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 But I was clear in own head. There would be no lapses by the men under my watch. we would treat the POWs correctly and with compassion. It was what I had asked of them. It was what Colonel Tim asked of them. The response was fantastic not only did they do what was requested, but they often did more, giving up there own water and food so at least some of our charges could be satiated. I was and am extremely proud of them.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 My responsibility wasn't only for the living, though- there were also the dead to deal with. We made sure the bodies were buried with dignity. Not for them a shallow trench and only enough soil to stop the dogs smelling the putrefying flesh and digging them up. My men did as they would want done, They went out with map and compass and dug the graves to face Mecca. Where possible they would ask a comrade of the dead to say a prayer.

  • @grimblebrumble17889 It took time and effort but it took place without complaint. They say that humanity is cast aside in war. I'm pleased that with my men it never was. Now you can say anything you want you have human rights, but when you insult a branch of the British armed forces and reside within her boundaries you in many peoples opinion degrade yourself considerably. You can call me what you want and disagree with anger on political view's.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @grimblebrumble17889 But these men and women who serve us don't deserve that and you don't deserve them. TA units are currently risking there lives in the region and over 1200 soldiers annually are going on operations. You assumed I was threatening you and that I'm racist and I'm neither. That word assumption keeps popping up!! So you should feel some guilt for what you have said in my opinion and if you don't then you are shallow and cruel.

  • @useraaron321 Oorah! God Bless. God Save the Queen!!

  • @HardcoreHalalHater Without trying to patronize you I love you're country. Strong allies always!

  • @grimblebrumble17889 Deary me. Your views seem to have been formed by reading the Beano. Believe me, the reason people are not with you is not because of their 'naivety'.

  • THANK YOU TONY!!! and for rest of you ignorant's wake up or do us all a favor and shut it

  • tony blair is a WAR CRIMINAL made by THE WORLDWIDE ZIONIST LOBY

  • Oh how that makes me miss Blair. Talk about statesman.

  • Great Britain is the country of dignity,justice,freedom and democracy, most respected country in the world,but how is possible that this great country tolerate lies of Toni Blair and criminal occupation of sovereign country for a long time.

  • why are Islamic Terrorists not out bombing Ireland, or Japan ? Or Sweeden ? Or Canada ? Because those kind of countries mind their own fucking business !

    Oh, but not us.

  • @valarmanwe But thay have bombed Spain, Italy, Bali, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, India, Egypt, Somalia, France, Kenya, Morocco, Jordan, Algeria and Pakistan. So Islamic Terrorists are hardly 'minding their own business' either are they. They are fascist lunatics who need to be stopped. For humanities sake. You cannot wish them away. People like you always say you are anti-war....but really what you mean is you are pro war for the other side. Get some balls and call a spade a spade.

  • @finchy633 Please don`t puport to tell me what I mean. I will tell you what I mean. I mean I am absolutely against war.I am not at all interested in a `pro war for the other side.` War represents nothing but a total failure of humanity. War is disgusting.

    I can listen to different views, and I do understand them. But, in my own view, there are no winners. Any nation who declares war - an individual - has at once lost it. No one can win a war.

  • @valarmanwe So you are a pacifist?

  • @finchy633 Hello. Depends what you mean by Pacifist. For now, I`ll just ask this: When did an Afhgan or Iraqi bomb last drop on Great Britain prior to our going to war with those countries ?

    I could be wrong. But I think if we left them alone, they`d leave us alone - contrary to what TB says. And someone made a point that `they` have bombed Spain, Italy, Bali, etc. Well, that is their affair, not ours.

  • @valarmanwe So you are an nationalist pacifist. Im sorry to break it to you, but we have signed numerous treaties since the second world war what ensure countries all over the world that we will not let their countries be taken over by bandits and terrorists. Globalisation has meant that to stay haughtily above other countries affairs is impossible. And fascism is NOT caused by resisting it. Don't ever make that mistake.

  • @finchy633 Wow ! So eloquently put. Now I get it. We are under an obligation to go and drop bombs on the heads of innocent middle easteners. Killing thier women and children.

    Forgive me, I forgot we`ve signed papers.

  • @valarmanwe Drop bombs on the heads of innocent middle easterners? You have neither read nothing about or understood the war in Iraq. Iraq was a wretched wilderness, suffering from more than 30 years of fascism. Now it is a free country, with a socialist leader, a constitution, and the ability to settle internal disputes by diplomacy rather than murder. And you think this is a bad thing? How do you account for yourself? If you say, Im a pacifist nationalist, then I'd understand.

  • @finchy633 Oh, so now we were not only under an obligation to kill whomever we must, we were doing them a favour !

    It would be half a job well done if we went there to free those people. But we were not there for their sakes,as well you know !

    I don`t label myself as anything. I just speak as I find.

  • @valarmanwe Who said we were ever 'under an obligation to kill whoever we must?'. I must direct you to my last post. 30 years of fascism is over, and now the country has a constitution, a free press, and diplomacy rather than murder is the common currency. Also, the oil in the region is finally being used to its full potential. And Iraq is all set to be the new Dubai. And I repeat...you think this is a bad thing? Is this worse than fascism?

  • @finchy633 are you in the same planet? Iraq is now a hell-hole full of insurgent murderers.

    some country's need a dictator.

  • @MrGilles1990 Well, obviously it isn't. Insurgents? Al qaeda was kicked out of Iraq, along with the genocidal Baath party. The Iraqi people are at least making a go of democracy. And I support them. Unlike you, who would rather see them undergo ethnic cleansing, or remain the private property of the Hussein family. why not try to be an internationalist for once? It is what the left used to stand for after all.

  • @finchy633 al Qaeda kicked out of Iraq? Saddam was an enemy of al Qaeda you created more terrorist's by invading the country!

    You yanks like to mess things up well i guess that's what happens when most of you do not even know where the country you are invading is!

    All i know is that Iraq was not democratic before the war and it is not democratic after the war.

  • @MrGilles1990 Firstly, I'm British, and a socialist. Secondly, you are ignorant of the situation. Saddam invited Al qaeda into Iraq when every other country in the region was kicking them out. Ansar al-Islam was mr Zarqawi's force in Iraq - how you do not know this I have no idea.

    "All i know is that Iraq was not democratic before the war and it is not democratic after the war".

    Well, as you are wrong about that too, I guess you can rephrase it to - "I don't actually know anything".

  • @finchy633 'I guess you can rephrase it to - "I don't actually know anything". '

    Well, he still gets to talk. It's annoying, isn't it? But still, I think, necessary. The most effective form of criticism? Mockery. So I think you're on to something, there.

  • @valarmanwe cannada were fighting too. the targets are symbolic why hit a tower in sweeden?

  • this man was just the best at thinking on his feet and speaches!!

  • @MrGilles1990 Oh, you in the UK are so deluded now that oppose Afghanistan and dont realize that the Muslims are slowly taking over your own country. And I dare you to find a better ally than the United States, oh who France or the EU? The countries robbing you dry? Cameron also agreed with the war in Iraq, why dont I hear any criticism of him, but Blair is a war criminal. Its because you people are nutcase isolationists who have your head up your ass until its too damn late like in 1939.

  • @Jbroks86 we in the UK supported the Afghan war first off but then you yanks had to mess things up by attacking Iraq we did not finish the job now it is an impossible job to complete.

    you are NOT our allies we give our blood to your little war in Iraq and you will not even help us against the Argentinians!

    we are not your slaves!

    Best way to deal with terrorism now is to pump money into the secret services.

    and share info.

  • He resigned Not Ousted.So Gordon brown could Step in as Prime Minister,and had the backing of most of the Labour party to Run again. I don't know what Paper you've been reading.

  • Blair kissing the arses of the Yanks after they funded terrorism for decades, America are no allies of the UK..

  • @mhffc

    I agree, my country will use your island nation as it's bitch. Too bad your politicians are as pathetic as Blair. As for the US, I have little hope for the future. We are going the way all empires do but will bring done more than most have I suspect.

  • violence took a lot of strength but, thanks to all the projects being executed in all countries has declined slightly the rates of violence in the world, the events of September 11 is an example of how far we can reach these acts of evil, besides the prime minister has great knowledge of what is happening in the country, he is doing a good job ...

  • out of the whole bloodshed experience there is something positives either release or better options in life for the people involved, taking as starting point the positive aspects of it

  • Never liked his homeland policies but this is a great and true speech, UK and USA must stand together til the ending of the world.

  • @uncleandy182 support your local war criminal, one million iraq people have died based on these two fuckwits lies.

  • I couldn't agree more with cafeturkie.

  • Like him or hate him, support the war or oppose it, this is an excellent defence of it.