you a scared of this man, listen to what he says, he's not wrong and we are sick in of the indoctrination of the lies of evolution. Are you kidding me? You have no idea how incredibly complex our world/universe/body/nature is. Be scared, because you are wrong, and you completely disrespected this man, the mentally handicapped and yourself. You should be ashamed.
Ken Ham is an arsehole - the guy pretending to be mentally challenged is a worse arsehole. Not funny, not acceptable. It is not neccessary to do this to prove Ham is a fool.
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with here in your heart?
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible says despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your i for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
You have got to be kidding me. No doubt that is what they believe about you.
Surely it doesn't matter what you believe, so long as you have lead a good life and have caused more good than bad.
If the way you worship god should not effect your chances in the afterlife (assuming it exists). If God is all-knowing, then he knows that that is how you were raised and how you think it is best to worship him.
btw. why do you need to worship god? Surely he doesn't need it.
if god wants to make you burn in hell for eternity just because you dont accept his existence even though youve led a good life n not harmed anyone then i think god needs to go to anger management
@daddyV88 What good life? Haven't you read Job? God didn't disagree about Job being a righteous and upright man. Job was more righteous than anybody alive today and he didn't have the law or a Bible. God answers Job read Chapters 38-40 and "gird up your loins"
What you want is for it to be ok to spend a lifetime being your own god then face him one day and not be accountable. Right? That's what your'e saying.
@daddyV88 God doesn't send you to hell for not believing in Him. He sends you to hell for being a vile filthy sinner who hates God and doesn't want anything to do with Him--so He gives you what you want. Which is hell.
@dougmoerhoffman so u could be a vile filthy sinner who rapes and kills people and then accepts the lord as his saviour n go to heaven..thats good to know
while the suckers who lead perfectly harmless lives but refuse to believe in him go to hell for eternity...thats definitely fair..good one god!
@daddyV88 There is no one who does good, not one.
Those people who are "perfectly harmless?" They don't exist. They're a figment of your imagination. Everyone you know and everyone you don't know is a vile, wretched, evil sinner, who deserves hell just for the things they thought in their mind in the last 24 hours.
The Bible is honest about mankind's evilness. This offends some people, who suffer from pride issues. I hope that's not you.
@daddyV88 its not a matter of accepting his existence, its accepting his forgiveness for the sins in your life. If you feel you dont have any sin or you dont have to answer for it then that is your decision but i politely ask that you not spread misinformation or misrepresent something of which you are obviously ignorant. Oh,, its also not up to you whether GOD gets angry or not........sorry :(
Ken Ham is a scientific genius, whose revolutionary ideas about dinosaur-human cohabitation are so threatening, that the atheist hoodlums of this nation actually fel threatened. So much so that they will stoop to nothing to try and tarnish Mr. Ham's great name. Mr. Ham, continue fighting the good fight. Our lord in heaven watches over you.
@Eye2EyeIIV Amen buddy, Ken Ham is the founder of AiG if anything happened to silence I dunno what the world would be like. Just imagine, most people would be to discouraged to continue defending Christianity.
@Eye2EyeIIV Please tell me you are being sarcastic !!!??? Dinosaur-human cohabitation give me a break ! Why did god create dinosaurs anyway ? What lovely creatures to have dominion over. Just look at the genetic evidence for evolution, problem solved.
@Eye2EyeIIV Ken Hams "science" is about as threatening as being attacked by a midget on stilts. The only hoodlums I see are the tiny creationist cult who feel a need to push their stunted beliefs into the education system. If Ken Ham is a genius then we really are doomed. If you really think Ham is a genius then you are a fool in the true sense of the word
@Micahthetatter Hahaha that s the best joke I've ever heard. Oh wait thats even better there really was an astronaut by the name of Kenneth Ham. Are you joking?Surely you have to be. I am a Scientist at a university Research Institute (Microbiology). So I have a fair idea of the bull this idiot is going on about. Ken Ham wouldnt know science if it smacked him in the face...which it does often, and hes oblivious to it.
@yournotright101 A scientist of microbiology, thats rad. I love science (not a scholar by any means), but especially love microbiology. I would love to have a discussion with you. If you dont want to I understand, I just dont run into scientist very often. Hope to hear from you.
@BelieveandtrustJesus What reason do they have for doing this? A Muslim child grows up thinking that Christianity is a joke, because that's what their parents told them. They keep that mindset for the rest of their lives. They can't be reasoned with because of their cultural biases, but remember, it's not their fault that they were born into that society.
Also, what about people who die at age 25, and don't have as much time to explore religion as someone who dies at age 80?
@BelieveandtrustJesus It definitely is a finite crime, since it will only last for 80 years at the most ,maybe a bit more. However, eternity is forever. I can't think of a single reason that could justify this.
More importantly, you're missing the point about geographical locations. I know that according to the bible, people don't go to hell for being hindu, but for being sinful. However, a hindu or a muslim (born into that faith) has less of a chance to become saved. Is that fair?
@BelieveandtrustJesus You didn't answer my question. Why should a finite crime be met with an infinite punishment?
Also, you're aware that there is a mathematical differentiation in the probability that an individual will become a Christian, rather than any other system of belief, or lack thereof? How can you say that it is good and just for one person to burn in hell, just because they were born in India or Iran, and grew up in the wrong faith?
@DYTisOver Just compare allah to the Living God. Qur'an says that a person sins he sins against himself. That's interesting to any Bible reader because Jehovah is so holy sin cannot come close to him and all have sinned against him. See that difference? Ravi Zacharias (India) is a Christian - Walid Shoebat (former PLO terrorist) now Christian - God called Abraham out of Ur, and Job (both before the law) out of Uz. The problem isn't God the problem is man doesn't seek God (Romans 3:11)
@TechLinkOnline We can compare deities all day, but just because some have exclusive features in comparison to others, it doesn't mean they are true.
Your argument is basically: "Christianity is different than Islam, therefore it is true."
Also, just because a select few people from different cultures have become Christian, doesn't negate the fact that the majority of people born in India will not become Christian. Also, have you considered all the Christians who convert to Islam or Atheism?
@DYTisOver Yes, 1 John talks about defectors - they had them in the early church too. He said they were never the real deal. Who's the biggest one in history? Judas Iscariot.
I was showing one comparison on Holiness which I think is important. God is holy and perfect - we are not. Jesus was holy and perfect and walked out of his own grave. His blood atones for our imperfection. Why did the Jews have an animal sacrificial system from the time of Moses until Jesus came onto the scene?
@TechLinkOnline Every religion has defectors, and a lot of them predicted that they would too, it's of little significance. Also, you have yet to provide that the biblical version of a man named "Judas Iscariot" ever existed. We need more historical sources than just the bible to prove his existence.
Furthermore, I could claim that the Invisible Pink Unicorn is holy and perfect, and we are not. What does that prove? Nothing.
Coincidentally, you have also not proven that Moses/Jesus existed.
@DYTisOver Want to know how we know they exist? History. Sir Ramisees (I think that's how it's spelled, and they didn't give his first name) Thought the Bible was wrong with the existence of these people, so he went to one of the biggest libraries in Rome. After 3 weeks, he found out they all existed.
Oh yeah, don't forget the tombs found with their very names. One says "Jesus of Nasareth" but I think it's a fake. But they find tombs with Bible names on it, so the people did exist.
@BelieveandtrustJesus You're glad that liars will burn in the lake of fire and brimstone? What kind of monster are you? Why should a finite "crime" be met with an infinite punishment?
Who can spot the person with down's syndrome? I'll give you a hint he's wearing a suit and tie, has a beard, is holding a bottle of water, and his name rhymes with Pen Fam! Any guesses, anyone...
So, the sum total of the remarks by atheists and agnostics in this thread is "Ken ham is the retard; He's the actual retard; Ham is a retard in this video etc.." Thanks for imparting such deep thought from the incredibly sharp collective acumen. Keep up the good work!
Ken Ham and his pseudo-science "museum" are a joke! However, he does make a convincing argument about Carbon-dating only being able to date back 100,000 years. So, how do we date items older than 100,000 years? Don't get me wrong, I believe this planet IS 4.5 billion years old, though I also accept theres a God who began everything with the "Big-Bang" some 13 Billion years ago. Google: "OLD EARTH CREATIONISM" or "ANSWERS IN CREATION" (NOT Answers in Genesis!) to learn more.
@TheCroatiaKid "Don't play games with me buddy, you know EXACTLY what I'm talking about."
No actually I don't know of any time that he was actually right. Everytime he opens his mouth, nothing resembling the truth ever comes out. So what exactly has he told the truth about?
Imagine the horror if Ken Ham and Wendy Wright were to have a kid! The stupidity and snide condescending self-righteous ignorance of that abomination would be enough to cause the universe to implode in on itself, thus propelling us into infinity realm of asshattery.
The only non-retards in the entire room were the dude in the wheelchair, his pusher and the cameraman, who must have been drugged up to the eyeballs to stop himself from laughing wildly at the hysterical morons.
#3 No, we're just trying to do what God told us to. The Muslims are pretty sanctimonious though, same with the Catholics. Don't confuse Catholicism with Christianity.
#4 We try to convert the whole world. And no one in their right mind would want to go to hell.
#5 Our religion is different because we have a merciful God, which happens to be the Creator and Savior!
#1 ... almost everything? OK no, but Christianity has a tendency to be at odds with reality.
#2 Most are quite patient, and even cordial.
#3 Catholics are not Christians because why? They're wrong?
#4 eh... ok, makes sense from your perspective.
#5 sic, your religion has a merciful God? Islam does not? Why, because christian salvation is based on faith and grace where Islamic salvation is based on a balance of good choices vs evil choices? The difference is debatable at best.
@Darkestaxe Science and the Bible don't really conflict, if anything the Bible actually has some science in it.
Catholics aren't Christians because they change God's Word. They change the 10 commandments too, just so they can worship Mary.
Mohammad himself didn't know where he was going when he died, what kind of assurance is that? The Bible tells us how to be saved, so we know for sure where we are going when we die.
#1 Every type of time dating system places the world at billions of years old, whereas christianity says it is only six thousand years old.
#2 Don't confuse patience with condescension.
#3 Some of them are nice and genial about it all, but others are dogmatic and irritating. btw catholicism is a type of christianity, don't pretend they are different.
#4 Has it ever crossed your mind that the 'whole world' doesn't want to be converted? Hells existence is also debatable
#5 How would an outsider to different cultures know what was unique about christianity in comparison to the greek/roman/norse myths of creation? And 'merciful god' my ass! Your god killed thousands of people and told his soldiers to take enemy women as their slaves because they worshipped a different god. Lots of religions had a good afterlife for good people and bad ones for bad people.
I do know some very nice christians, so don't think I am being a biased dickhead please. :)
@MegaSolipsist Think of His mercy... ALL we DESERVE is death and hell, anything above that is a blessing! God told Joshua and them to kill everyone for a purpose. In Genesis God made a special promise "I will bless the nation that blesses you, and curse the nation that curses you". And He also ordered them all to die to show His might, He could anyone anytime, He's a God worth fearing.
Islam orders the death of anyone who won't convert, so do many others. God's promise is better still.
All we deserve is death and hell? Why? Because somebody who is supposedly our ancestor did something wrong so we are held accountable. That's not mercy, that's just vindictive sadism.
And don't quote scripture to prove your point. God didn't say any of those things to Joshua, because God doesn't, and did not, exist.
Give me irrefutable evidence, exclusive to the bible and faith, that God exists please.
No-one inherently deserves anything, so we should just try to get along :)
@MegaSolipsist Have you ever told a lie? Of course you have, the Bible says you already deserve death and hell.
Irrefutable evidence? I'll start with a weird one, the biggest proof for God is the lack of evidence of the contrary.
Face it, if God didn't do it, what did?Where did everything really start?How did we get time, gravity, motion, energy, life, matter, inertia, etc.from nothing?
It makes more sense that ID did it. Let's try to exclude God, and just say intelligent designer. That good?
@nightrise73 "the biggest proof for God is the lack of evidence of the contrary". Thats truly brilliant with that kind of logic youve just proven the existence of the celestial tea cup, pink unicorns, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, santa etc etc etc. Now which one shall I worship above all others. Are you serious or is this a joke.
He most likely knew the guy was normal and not a retard. When the "retard" spoke: I like dinosaurs!!, Ken was surprised, but he knew he was pretending.
6 days in the spirit world is 6,000 days in our world.
Now does the sentence: God created the universe in 6 days make sense.
Ken is a good sport, even though he knows that wheelchair boy is mocking him. Typical of an atheist to deceive...since they don't believe that there are any consequences to their immoral actions.
@mmeasy123 Didn't your parents ever teach you not to call people names? Oh, that's right...I forgot...atheists don't know anything about "the Golden Rule" which Jesus preached.
@caycug1 Apparently your moronic parents never taught you ANYTHING because then maybe you would know that an ATHEIST (Confucius) preached the Golden Rule 500 years before this "Jesus" character. It's also hypocritical of you to make such an asinine comment about atheists being immoral. To be perfectly honest, you sound like a complete imbecile.
@mmeasy123 In general, atheists are selfish and don't like rules. That is why they like to pretend that God doesn't exist. Because God's existence would mean that they aren't the top dog, and they would need to submit to a higher authority. Atheist's want to be their own god. Love is about self sacrifice... which is what Jesus did for us. The only time an atheist would sacrifice is if it meant personal gain for their self. You didn't come from a rock.
@caycug1 You are either trolling or suffer from severe down syndrome. For entertainment sake, I'll play along and pretend you are being serious. Provide a shred of evidence to support your claim that "In general, atheists are selfish and don't like rules." I'll wait, but not too long....you absolute moron.
@mmeasy123 Believing in Jesus is about believing in love...loving other people...standing up for the oppressed, the poor, the abused. Atheists choose not to believe in Jesus, so that tells me that they don't care about anyone but themselves. Others are not at the top of their priority list. That is called selfishness.
@mmeasy123 Believing in God means humbling yourself before a greater power. Since atheists don't believe in God, that means they don't want to follow his rules of justice and morality. So that tells me that they don't like rules. The opposite of rules is randomness and chaos...Atheists think we randomly popped into existence...so they like chaos...not rules.
@caycug1 I asked you for evidence you stupid moron. This isn't your opportunity to preach your moronic nonsense. Either provide evidence or don't make such absolutely asinine claims. I already shut you down with your "Golden Rule" idea, now you have dodged providing evidence. Either provide evidence or shut your stupid mouth. No one is interested in your bullshit.
@mmeasy123 God loves you. I'm not saying that facetiously. He loves you just as much as He loves me. Jesus died for you, just as much as for me. His sacrifice for us is a free gift. You will never be good enough to earn your way to heaven. When we call on Him, He hears us, and will help us. Listen for His voice. He really does love you. He knows how many hairs you have on your head. He knows what you've been through, and what you are going through right now. His door is open.
@caycug1 Didn't I just say no one gives a fuck about your stupid preaching bullshit? You at least concede that it was a moronic statement that "In general, atheists are selfish and don't like rules" and that you are a very stupid child for saying it. I accept your concession but now it's time for you to fuck off. I have thoroughly owned you. The proof is that you resort to your preaching nonsense when you can't provide evidence. Fuck you.
@caycug1 Fucking douche bag shut your stupid fucking face. You make stupid claims and I call you on them now you continue with your preaching bullshit. Fuck off and get the fuck out of here. Scum bag.
@mmeasy123 just throwing a warning, your language leads you to be taken less seriously. It's not going to help with those who already think "atheists are rude bastards". It leaves a much better impression when you find someone annoying but still manage to stay polite.
@mmeasy123 Yeah, thanks, had a nice fingering session. I don't mean you have to bend all over to be apologetic for them just so you know. But all of us atheists can speak as we like after all. Have a nice fuck you too.
ken ham is the fucking retard here. " all dating methods are suspect.." yet the bible isn't huh? its one 100% true cause the bible tells you so? fucking faith-heads.
@beerbrain420 yOU SEEM PRETTY SMART IN THIS BEER BRAIN HAVE YOU QUIT DRINKIN BEER OR DID YOU TAKE A SMART PILL. MR HAM DOESNT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH HAMMS BEER SO WHY YOU THERE LOSER JUST SHOWING EVERYONE HOW INTELIGANT YOU ARE OR WHAT
@OregonOutlaw2000 You seriously need to die, troll. Teabaggers are the lowest form of life imaginable, pretty much on par with slugs. You would only be worth something if your corpse was run though a wood chipper and then your guts fed to the sharks, hopefully they wouldn't be poisoned.
@OregonOutlaw2000 It's a rip off because the founder was an Atheist? I go with the Red Cross where ever they are needed if I'm free & the work we do doesn't seem to be a rip off. Global warming isn't a myth, pull your head out of your ass.
@beerbrain420 hide the decline What a scam Mann is a idiot working with gore on global warming and the globalists with tax and trade its all a big scam for the eliet globalists to get rich selling carbon credits duh you are so dumb its embarrasing to think youre a human being and not a jack ass
@beerbrain420 now look what you did you pissed off a marine somone a person like you would spit on you are a loser dude do yourself a favor and join a tea party and be somebody
Live it up Mr Ham. Once your generation dies, its over. Religion is falling like a stone off a cliff, and Atheism is climbing faster than our ancestral monkeys up a tree. You can brainwash kids all you want, but they cannot escape the age of information they are being brought up in. Its only a matter of time before they realize you lied your ass off to them.
Regardless of how you feel about creationism I don't understand why impersonating a mentally handicapped person is the best way to engage Ken in a serious debate. In essence the "journalist" was mocking retarded people in order to mock Mr. Ham; so if you dislike Ken isn't the journalist equally or more offensive because of the way he exploits and parodies the mentally challenged?
@ElementsUnknown people are afraid of the truth. Ken destroys people in all debates, so they mock him. Shows who is evil for sure when you have to stoop to this level of mocking.
I'm sorry, but the theosophical equivalent of shutting his eyes and shouting "lalalala I can't hear you" does not win debates. Ken Ham gives no scientific evidence for anything, he just tries to loosely interpret anything scientific as evil so he can say it is morally wrong because he cannot provide any scientific evidence why it is wrong. That is the straw-man argument. You cannot beat an argument so you construct a weaker argument and attack that instead.
I have read his book The Lie: Evolution. It is ridiculous. He gives plenty of poorly reasoned arguments about why he thinks evolution is morally wrong without any evidence for why it is scientifically wrong, which is how a scientific theory should be addressed.
He gives sweeping generalisations about scientists with nothing to back those claims up. According to Ken Ham, he is the only non-biased person in the whole world.
Please provide such evidence of him winning debates.
I have gone to that site. It is stupid. Every scientific dating system gives the Earth at billions of years old. Scientists are not grasping at straws when we have more than one theory, they are just admitting that they do not know. Yet.
Scientific theories should be addressed with science, fairy tales should not even come into it.
What makes the bible different from all the other holy books? Nothing. We might as well believe in pink unicorns that ride teacups around the sun.
@MegaSolipsist If u really read data you would see huge holes in evolution. I reject it because of the statistical improbability of abiogenesis. The cell is simply to complex and the DNA coding is the most advanced language system we know of. Your outright dismissal as fairy tale is a biased position because you simply reject the idea of God, not the evidence. The 10 command. for instance, would solve 90% of the worlds problems if applied.
@schlabresfan The cell evolves to be more complex over billions of years, because the different molecules in it react to different chemicals and this allows the cell to adapt to different enviroments. By saying that evolution is too statistically improbable to have happened, you are making the mount improbable fallacy. Just because the end result is statistically improbable does not mean that any of thew billions of changes that have happened are impossible on their own.
@MegaSolipsist not true...the cell has to have all it's components all at once or it cannot function, reproduce etc...at a minimum it requires energy production, replication systems, inter cell communication, waste disposal, etc...all have to have the systems there at once...this is impossible. Thus irreducible complexity virtually eliminates the possibility of abiogenesis. The more molecular biologists dig, the more complex it gets.
@schlabresfan The eye was thought to bean example of irreducible complexity, but that can be explained by evolution, especially when you consider how badly 'designed' it is. They are both examples of something simple that has had more and more stuff added to it, through evolution, and these things have evolved to work together, and now they cannot survive without each other.
Another example is the Hubble telescope, which was made wrong, so something was added to correct it.
@MegaSolipsist the eye is still an example, millions of complex nerves, cones, rods, etc...we have no evidence of a simple eye, since there is no such ting. Same with cells...there is no such thing as a simple cell as I have explained. The Hubble telescope was designed, worked on and improved through intelligent design! It did not create itself through random processes. Micheal Behe's "Darwins Blackbox" is a good read on this topic. Dr. Henry Morris has several good reads as well.
@schlabresfan But the eye started out as a simple photoreceptor for unicellular organisms, and over millions and billions of years more stuff was added (by evolution and natural selection), all of it working together, and now everything is needed. It is irreducibly complex, but it still can be explained via evolution.
The hubble telescope is the same, I was just using it as an example. They added the extra lens to correct it, and it is still irreducibly complex, it needs everything to work.
@schlabresfan But the eye started out as a simple photoreceptor for unicellular organisms, and over millions and billions of years more stuff was added (by evolution and natural selection), all of it working together, and now everything is needed. It is irreducibly complex, but it still can be explained via evolution.
The hubble telescope is the same, I was just using it as an example. They added the extra lens to correct it, and it is still irreducibly complex, it needs everything to work.
But the eye started out as a simple photoreceptor for unicellular organisms, and over millions and billions of years more stuff was added (by evolution and natural selection), all of it working together, and now everything is needed. It is irreducibly complex, but it still can be explained via evolution.
The hubble telescope is the same, I was just using it as an example. They added the extra lens to correct it, and it is still irreducibly complex, it needs everything to work.
@schlabresfan Thank you for the recommendations, I will try to read those books as soon as possible. I looked them up on wikipedia, and they received very negative peer reviews, but I will read them nonetheless.
If you want exciting possibilities then you should read The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene. It is not about evolution/creation, but about quantum physics, strong theory in an eleven dimensional universe and the origins of the universe.
It has several scientific theories for why the universe has the laws that it does, and it is an absolutely fascinating book, although it is sometimes very hard to understand.
@schlabresfan A virus is a simple cell, although I concede that you have a point. However, I must point out that simpler animals have far simpler cells than humans, and besides, we only know a tiny fraction of a percentage of all the single-celled organisms, which is how complex life first arose, that are expected to exist.
I am interested in looking at both sides of the argument, so could you recommend an interesting science book about creation?
I must thank you also for such an enjoyable conversation. I admit that most evolutionists do too much mocking, assuming themselves to be intellectually superior.
There are also far too many creationists who adopt a condescending manner and treat people like children (although given some of the posts on this site, I can understand that), or just threaten us all with eternal torment.
It is nice to have an adult conversation for a change.
I must thank you also for such an enjoyable conversation. I admit that most evolutionists do too much mocking, assuming themselves to be intellectually superior.
There are also far too many creationists who adopt a condescending manner and treat people like children (although given some of the posts on this site, I can understand that), or just threaten us all with eternal torment.
It is nice to have an adult conversation for a change.
Ken Ham still believes that bats are birds because the bible told him so.
socksumi 3 days ago
you a scared of this man, listen to what he says, he's not wrong and we are sick in of the indoctrination of the lies of evolution. Are you kidding me? You have no idea how incredibly complex our world/universe/body/nature is. Be scared, because you are wrong, and you completely disrespected this man, the mentally handicapped and yourself. You should be ashamed.
emelomusic 2 weeks ago
This video should have been called mentally disabled person vs. retard... The challenged kid is not the "retard" in this exchange...
ryansling 3 weeks ago
witch one is retard?
mam16cm 1 month ago
@mam16cm the one that spells "which like "witch"
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 month ago
@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 i just wonder how good do you speak and write in my language
mam16cm 1 month ago
@mam16cm i don't speak creationist
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 month ago
@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 like nobody in europe
mam16cm 1 month ago
I'm sure that Bible doesn't tell Ken Ham that Panda is omnivorous animals. God, you are stupid if you really exist.
MrMomingqimiao 1 month ago
Ken Ham is an arsehole - the guy pretending to be mentally challenged is a worse arsehole. Not funny, not acceptable. It is not neccessary to do this to prove Ham is a fool.
revjimbob 1 month ago
Notice how Ken Ham never actualy answers the questions being asked.
He just changes the topic to something he has a scripted reply for.
00CaptainDan00 2 months ago
this is disgraceful,... posing as a retard?
silvrstridr 2 months ago
ken ham IS a retard
WoollyMammoth16 2 months ago
It's difficult to tell which one is the retard.... I'd go for the wolf man.
CarajilloDulce 2 months ago
The disabled one in wheelchair is smarter, obviously :D
CreativeVisionary92 2 months ago
we have more vertebrate Australopithecus fossils than t-rex fossils.
kelbykross1 3 months ago
I didn't know ken ham was in a wheelchair! :-)
lordscully 3 months ago
lol, this is so wrong.
endthedisease 3 months ago
It's ironic that ham looks like a monkey with a beard.
tooyjfwn 3 months ago
The dude is faking being a retard,pretty obvious.
korzon 3 months ago
The video should be called Ken Ham the retard. He makes me ashamed to be Australian. Ken Ham is the holocaust denier of science.
yournotright101 3 months ago
Lol here is the only way Ken Ham could not be schooled by someone who doesen't support creationism
RomanHistoryNut 3 months ago
the disabled guys is actually smarter than him word to that
chamberlandfill 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you ready?
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with here in your heart?
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible says despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your i for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
standingontruth1 4 months ago
KEEP IT UP KEN!
YOU'RE JUST GOING TO LOOK STUPIDER WHEN YOU ARE FINALLY AND INCONTRAVERTIBLY PROVEN WRONG.
P.S. Just my opinion, but I think Ken Ham looks like a peadophile.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago 8
@BelieveandtrustJesus
You have got to be kidding me. No doubt that is what they believe about you.
Surely it doesn't matter what you believe, so long as you have lead a good life and have caused more good than bad.
If the way you worship god should not effect your chances in the afterlife (assuming it exists). If God is all-knowing, then he knows that that is how you were raised and how you think it is best to worship him.
btw. why do you need to worship god? Surely he doesn't need it.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
He went full retard... You never go full retard.
The guy in the wheelchair should have told him that.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago 17
@BelieveandtrustJesus
Blasphemy in this case being not christian, which is not something they can help seeing as they were raised as a hindu.
Maybe you will go to the islam hell because you are christian and not muslim, simply because you were raised a christian.
If you go to hell because you were raised as a different religious group, then whichever god exists is a dick, really.
Atheists don't burn in hell, because we don't have souls.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
everything came from a soup is a simpler modern science explanation.
ikawpipa 4 months ago
Comment removed
iPriestHolmes 4 months ago
I thought this was just going to be a video of Ken Ham looking in the mirror.
EnhanceTheTruth 4 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@EnhanceTheTruth Can you help me out? Which one is Ken Ham?
taffwob 4 months ago
if god wants to make you burn in hell for eternity just because you dont accept his existence even though youve led a good life n not harmed anyone then i think god needs to go to anger management
daddyV88 5 months ago 8
@daddyV88 What good life? Haven't you read Job? God didn't disagree about Job being a righteous and upright man. Job was more righteous than anybody alive today and he didn't have the law or a Bible. God answers Job read Chapters 38-40 and "gird up your loins"
What you want is for it to be ok to spend a lifetime being your own god then face him one day and not be accountable. Right? That's what your'e saying.
TechLinkOnline 5 months ago
@daddyV88 God doesn't send you to hell for not believing in Him. He sends you to hell for being a vile filthy sinner who hates God and doesn't want anything to do with Him--so He gives you what you want. Which is hell.
Now you know.
dougmoerhoffman 3 months ago
@dougmoerhoffman so u could be a vile filthy sinner who rapes and kills people and then accepts the lord as his saviour n go to heaven..thats good to know
while the suckers who lead perfectly harmless lives but refuse to believe in him go to hell for eternity...thats definitely fair..good one god!
daddyV88 3 months ago
@daddyV88 There is no one who does good, not one.
Those people who are "perfectly harmless?" They don't exist. They're a figment of your imagination. Everyone you know and everyone you don't know is a vile, wretched, evil sinner, who deserves hell just for the things they thought in their mind in the last 24 hours.
The Bible is honest about mankind's evilness. This offends some people, who suffer from pride issues. I hope that's not you.
Abandon pride, embrace Jesus Christ.
dougmoerhoffman 3 months ago
@daddyV88 Besides jesus, name one person YOU think lived up to GODS standards (remember, not your standards)
Micahthetatter 3 months ago
@daddyV88 its not a matter of accepting his existence, its accepting his forgiveness for the sins in your life. If you feel you dont have any sin or you dont have to answer for it then that is your decision but i politely ask that you not spread misinformation or misrepresent something of which you are obviously ignorant. Oh,, its also not up to you whether GOD gets angry or not........sorry :(
Micahthetatter 3 months ago
Ken Ham is a scientific genius, whose revolutionary ideas about dinosaur-human cohabitation are so threatening, that the atheist hoodlums of this nation actually fel threatened. So much so that they will stoop to nothing to try and tarnish Mr. Ham's great name. Mr. Ham, continue fighting the good fight. Our lord in heaven watches over you.
Eye2EyeIIV 5 months ago
@Eye2EyeIIV Whatever you say coocoo mcbible
Reasonwillwin 5 months ago
@Eye2EyeIIV Amen buddy, Ken Ham is the founder of AiG if anything happened to silence I dunno what the world would be like. Just imagine, most people would be to discouraged to continue defending Christianity.
nightrise73 5 months ago
@Eye2EyeIIV Please tell me you are being sarcastic !!!??? Dinosaur-human cohabitation give me a break ! Why did god create dinosaurs anyway ? What lovely creatures to have dominion over. Just look at the genetic evidence for evolution, problem solved.
debrainwasher1 4 months ago
@Eye2EyeIIV Ken Hams "science" is about as threatening as being attacked by a midget on stilts. The only hoodlums I see are the tiny creationist cult who feel a need to push their stunted beliefs into the education system. If Ken Ham is a genius then we really are doomed. If you really think Ham is a genius then you are a fool in the true sense of the word
yournotright101 3 months ago
@yournotright101 ya, he only worked for nasa. What do you do?
Micahthetatter 3 months ago
@Micahthetatter Hahaha that s the best joke I've ever heard. Oh wait thats even better there really was an astronaut by the name of Kenneth Ham. Are you joking?Surely you have to be. I am a Scientist at a university Research Institute (Microbiology). So I have a fair idea of the bull this idiot is going on about. Ken Ham wouldnt know science if it smacked him in the face...which it does often, and hes oblivious to it.
yournotright101 3 months ago
@yournotright101 A scientist of microbiology, thats rad. I love science (not a scholar by any means), but especially love microbiology. I would love to have a discussion with you. If you dont want to I understand, I just dont run into scientist very often. Hope to hear from you.
Micahthetatter 3 months ago
@Micahthetatter That would be fine. My speciality is really molecular biology and biochemistry but I work as a microbiologist.
yournotright101 3 months ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus What reason do they have for doing this? A Muslim child grows up thinking that Christianity is a joke, because that's what their parents told them. They keep that mindset for the rest of their lives. They can't be reasoned with because of their cultural biases, but remember, it's not their fault that they were born into that society.
Also, what about people who die at age 25, and don't have as much time to explore religion as someone who dies at age 80?
DYTisOver 5 months ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus It definitely is a finite crime, since it will only last for 80 years at the most ,maybe a bit more. However, eternity is forever. I can't think of a single reason that could justify this.
More importantly, you're missing the point about geographical locations. I know that according to the bible, people don't go to hell for being hindu, but for being sinful. However, a hindu or a muslim (born into that faith) has less of a chance to become saved. Is that fair?
DYTisOver 5 months ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus You didn't answer my question. Why should a finite crime be met with an infinite punishment?
Also, you're aware that there is a mathematical differentiation in the probability that an individual will become a Christian, rather than any other system of belief, or lack thereof? How can you say that it is good and just for one person to burn in hell, just because they were born in India or Iran, and grew up in the wrong faith?
DYTisOver 5 months ago
@DYTisOver Just compare allah to the Living God. Qur'an says that a person sins he sins against himself. That's interesting to any Bible reader because Jehovah is so holy sin cannot come close to him and all have sinned against him. See that difference? Ravi Zacharias (India) is a Christian - Walid Shoebat (former PLO terrorist) now Christian - God called Abraham out of Ur, and Job (both before the law) out of Uz. The problem isn't God the problem is man doesn't seek God (Romans 3:11)
TechLinkOnline 5 months ago
@TechLinkOnline We can compare deities all day, but just because some have exclusive features in comparison to others, it doesn't mean they are true.
Your argument is basically: "Christianity is different than Islam, therefore it is true."
Also, just because a select few people from different cultures have become Christian, doesn't negate the fact that the majority of people born in India will not become Christian. Also, have you considered all the Christians who convert to Islam or Atheism?
DYTisOver 5 months ago
@DYTisOver Yes, 1 John talks about defectors - they had them in the early church too. He said they were never the real deal. Who's the biggest one in history? Judas Iscariot.
I was showing one comparison on Holiness which I think is important. God is holy and perfect - we are not. Jesus was holy and perfect and walked out of his own grave. His blood atones for our imperfection. Why did the Jews have an animal sacrificial system from the time of Moses until Jesus came onto the scene?
TechLinkOnline 5 months ago
@TechLinkOnline Every religion has defectors, and a lot of them predicted that they would too, it's of little significance. Also, you have yet to provide that the biblical version of a man named "Judas Iscariot" ever existed. We need more historical sources than just the bible to prove his existence.
Furthermore, I could claim that the Invisible Pink Unicorn is holy and perfect, and we are not. What does that prove? Nothing.
Coincidentally, you have also not proven that Moses/Jesus existed.
DYTisOver 5 months ago
@DYTisOver Want to know how we know they exist? History. Sir Ramisees (I think that's how it's spelled, and they didn't give his first name) Thought the Bible was wrong with the existence of these people, so he went to one of the biggest libraries in Rome. After 3 weeks, he found out they all existed.
Oh yeah, don't forget the tombs found with their very names. One says "Jesus of Nasareth" but I think it's a fake. But they find tombs with Bible names on it, so the people did exist.
nightrise73 4 months ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus You're glad that liars will burn in the lake of fire and brimstone? What kind of monster are you? Why should a finite "crime" be met with an infinite punishment?
DYTisOver 5 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@BelieveandtrustJesus You're glad that people will be tortured forever?
Chilldudeski 5 months ago 2
@BelieveandtrustJesus it would be a nice act of god, indeed :D
god loves fire (L)
FreedomKrown 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is sick... why would he pose as a disabled person?? This is insane
TheEntertainer29 6 months ago
Typical Christian...
TheLyingMustache 6 months ago 3
Hey Ken, did Adam and Eve domesticate the t-rex too?
Reaper081087 6 months ago 3
lol all animals were vegetarian!!!! <3<3<3 so cute!
GamerAndStuff 6 months ago
"Seculaaaar"
LMFAO
"How did the dinosaur bones get underneath the human bones?"
LMFAO
Mrgyn 6 months ago
Who can spot the person with down's syndrome? I'll give you a hint he's wearing a suit and tie, has a beard, is holding a bottle of water, and his name rhymes with Pen Fam! Any guesses, anyone...
MissKatetastic 6 months ago 2
So, the sum total of the remarks by atheists and agnostics in this thread is "Ken ham is the retard; He's the actual retard; Ham is a retard in this video etc.." Thanks for imparting such deep thought from the incredibly sharp collective acumen. Keep up the good work!
Wunji1 7 months ago
Ken Ham and his pseudo-science "museum" are a joke! However, he does make a convincing argument about Carbon-dating only being able to date back 100,000 years. So, how do we date items older than 100,000 years? Don't get me wrong, I believe this planet IS 4.5 billion years old, though I also accept theres a God who began everything with the "Big-Bang" some 13 Billion years ago. Google: "OLD EARTH CREATIONISM" or "ANSWERS IN CREATION" (NOT Answers in Genesis!) to learn more.
Timbrock1000 7 months ago
@Timbrock1000 So if carbon dating is limited and we find carbon in things which should be in the millions of years old how do we explain htat?
j919or 6 months ago
@Timbrock1000 If you think carbon-dating is the only method of dating back in time, you're ignorant and you should do something about it.
resparee 5 months ago
Ken Ham is right.
TheCroatiaKid 7 months ago
@TheCroatiaKid Right about what?
Thomaspain85 7 months ago
@Thomaspain85 Don't play games with me buddy, you know EXACTLY what I'm talking about.
TheCroatiaKid 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheCroatiaKid "Don't play games with me buddy, you know EXACTLY what I'm talking about."
No actually I don't know of any time that he was actually right. Everytime he opens his mouth, nothing resembling the truth ever comes out. So what exactly has he told the truth about?
Thomaspain85 7 months ago
@TheCroatiaKid since you not saying anything, im assuming "ken ham is right about nothing" is what your talking about.
powereater 7 months ago
so who is the retard and who is Ken Ham :)
maxikus920220 7 months ago
ken ham and wendy wright are the real retards in this video at 3:32
ApocaIypseNow0I2 7 months ago
wow, you've just proved that you can act like a retard, well done, maybe try and argue with him in a civilized way?
jarhead572 8 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Imagine the horror if Ken Ham and Wendy Wright were to have a kid! The stupidity and snide condescending self-righteous ignorance of that abomination would be enough to cause the universe to implode in on itself, thus propelling us into infinity realm of asshattery.
KJRUSS0 8 months ago 3
Comment removed
KJRUSS0 8 months ago
The only non-retards in the entire room were the dude in the wheelchair, his pusher and the cameraman, who must have been drugged up to the eyeballs to stop himself from laughing wildly at the hysterical morons.
Wendy Wright and Ken Ham. What a perfect couple.
allieron 8 months ago 2
its funny that this handicapt person is revealing the retarderness of ken :)
MGsven 9 months ago
@pynic29
they make a great couple
their offspring would rule the universe with unparalleled ignorance.
whitespideralex 9 months ago
Posing as a mentally handicapped person and talking to a scientist. Wow. Good one.
aloranor 9 months ago
@aloranor -Did you just call Ken Ham a scientist???????
praisethenameofsatan 8 months ago
@praisethenameofsatan Yes.
aloranor 8 months ago
@aloranor thats hilarious
praisethenameofsatan 8 months ago
@praisethenameofsatan Why?
aloranor 8 months ago
Comment removed
praisethenameofsatan 8 months ago
Comment removed
praisethenameofsatan 8 months ago
@praisethenameofsatan In what way?
aloranor 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aloranor Because he is the antithesis of all things scientific. He's a credulous, delusional, medieval obscurantist.
praisethenameofsatan 8 months ago 2
Journalist posing as a retard vs an actual retard
RephrasedHD 9 months ago 37
@RephrasedHD Why do you make fun of Christians? Give one good, solid, irrefutable, and purposeful reason why.
nightrise73 5 months ago
@nightrise73
Because they annoy me.
#1 Their religion contradicts almost everything that has been proven by science.
#2 They try and ram it down my throat at every opportunity.
#3 Christians tend to be the most sanctimonious, holier-than-thou morons in the world.
#4 They assume that everyone else secretly wants to be saved and so they try to convert the intelligent world.
#5 They completely ignore the fact that there really is no difference between their religion and all the other ones.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist
#1 No it doesn't, give me one proof how it does.
#2 Real Christians should try to be more patient
#3 No, we're just trying to do what God told us to. The Muslims are pretty sanctimonious though, same with the Catholics. Don't confuse Catholicism with Christianity.
#4 We try to convert the whole world. And no one in their right mind would want to go to hell.
#5 Our religion is different because we have a merciful God, which happens to be the Creator and Savior!
nightrise73 4 months ago
@nightrise73
#1 ... almost everything? OK no, but Christianity has a tendency to be at odds with reality.
#2 Most are quite patient, and even cordial.
#3 Catholics are not Christians because why? They're wrong?
#4 eh... ok, makes sense from your perspective.
#5 sic, your religion has a merciful God? Islam does not? Why, because christian salvation is based on faith and grace where Islamic salvation is based on a balance of good choices vs evil choices? The difference is debatable at best.
Darkestaxe 4 months ago
@Darkestaxe Science and the Bible don't really conflict, if anything the Bible actually has some science in it.
Catholics aren't Christians because they change God's Word. They change the 10 commandments too, just so they can worship Mary.
Mohammad himself didn't know where he was going when he died, what kind of assurance is that? The Bible tells us how to be saved, so we know for sure where we are going when we die.
nightrise73 4 months ago
@nightrise73
#1 Every type of time dating system places the world at billions of years old, whereas christianity says it is only six thousand years old.
#2 Don't confuse patience with condescension.
#3 Some of them are nice and genial about it all, but others are dogmatic and irritating. btw catholicism is a type of christianity, don't pretend they are different.
#4 Has it ever crossed your mind that the 'whole world' doesn't want to be converted? Hells existence is also debatable
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@nightrise73
#5 How would an outsider to different cultures know what was unique about christianity in comparison to the greek/roman/norse myths of creation? And 'merciful god' my ass! Your god killed thousands of people and told his soldiers to take enemy women as their slaves because they worshipped a different god. Lots of religions had a good afterlife for good people and bad ones for bad people.
I do know some very nice christians, so don't think I am being a biased dickhead please. :)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist Think of His mercy... ALL we DESERVE is death and hell, anything above that is a blessing! God told Joshua and them to kill everyone for a purpose. In Genesis God made a special promise "I will bless the nation that blesses you, and curse the nation that curses you". And He also ordered them all to die to show His might, He could anyone anytime, He's a God worth fearing.
Islam orders the death of anyone who won't convert, so do many others. God's promise is better still.
nightrise73 4 months ago
@nightrise73
All we deserve is death and hell? Why? Because somebody who is supposedly our ancestor did something wrong so we are held accountable. That's not mercy, that's just vindictive sadism.
And don't quote scripture to prove your point. God didn't say any of those things to Joshua, because God doesn't, and did not, exist.
Give me irrefutable evidence, exclusive to the bible and faith, that God exists please.
No-one inherently deserves anything, so we should just try to get along :)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist Have you ever told a lie? Of course you have, the Bible says you already deserve death and hell.
Irrefutable evidence? I'll start with a weird one, the biggest proof for God is the lack of evidence of the contrary.
Face it, if God didn't do it, what did?Where did everything really start?How did we get time, gravity, motion, energy, life, matter, inertia, etc.from nothing?
It makes more sense that ID did it. Let's try to exclude God, and just say intelligent designer. That good?
nightrise73 4 months ago
@nightrise73 "the biggest proof for God is the lack of evidence of the contrary". Thats truly brilliant with that kind of logic youve just proven the existence of the celestial tea cup, pink unicorns, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, santa etc etc etc. Now which one shall I worship above all others. Are you serious or is this a joke.
yournotright101 3 months ago
@RephrasedHD That "retard" is putting fools like you to shame everyday his ministry is going.
dec4dence 4 months ago
Wasn't much of an acting job...
dex1391 9 months ago
who's the retarded?
PlutonGB 9 months ago
If you are such a big Confucius "Golden Rules" fan, then why do you keep calling me names? I guess you don't like rules.
caycug1 9 months ago
Vote Ian Murphy NY-26 where all of the other candidates are special too. Why hasn't Hollywood contacted him yet? He's a genius.
GeorgieWise 9 months ago
He knows the guy isn't "special" and is why he is talking normal to him!
Holly3418 9 months ago
He most likely knew the guy was normal and not a retard. When the "retard" spoke: I like dinosaurs!!, Ken was surprised, but he knew he was pretending.
6 days in the spirit world is 6,000 days in our world.
Now does the sentence: God created the universe in 6 days make sense.
Makes you think. . .
Want to know more?
Google: Vip pass to the Spirit World
Foundation360 9 months ago
If he's a liar why are some of you getting so cross about it?
animalhitsdrums 10 months ago
Ken is a good sport, even though he knows that wheelchair boy is mocking him. Typical of an atheist to deceive...since they don't believe that there are any consequences to their immoral actions.
caycug1 10 months ago
@caycug1
"Ken is a good "
Liar, He had admitted carbon datindg is only accurate to 50,000 years. He forgot the bibles lie of the world being 6000 years old OOPS
gorilla199uncensored 10 months ago
Comment removed
caycug1 10 months ago
@caycug1
Ken Ham is so retarded he had to move to the USA to get enuff cretards to give him money to enjoy a life sponging off the stupid god pretenders.
gorilla199uncensored 10 months ago
@caycug1 You are a gigantic moron.
mmeasy123 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 Didn't your parents ever teach you not to call people names? Oh, that's right...I forgot...atheists don't know anything about "the Golden Rule" which Jesus preached.
caycug1 9 months ago
@caycug1 Apparently your moronic parents never taught you ANYTHING because then maybe you would know that an ATHEIST (Confucius) preached the Golden Rule 500 years before this "Jesus" character. It's also hypocritical of you to make such an asinine comment about atheists being immoral. To be perfectly honest, you sound like a complete imbecile.
mmeasy123 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 In general, atheists are selfish and don't like rules. That is why they like to pretend that God doesn't exist. Because God's existence would mean that they aren't the top dog, and they would need to submit to a higher authority. Atheist's want to be their own god. Love is about self sacrifice... which is what Jesus did for us. The only time an atheist would sacrifice is if it meant personal gain for their self. You didn't come from a rock.
caycug1 9 months ago
@caycug1 You are either trolling or suffer from severe down syndrome. For entertainment sake, I'll play along and pretend you are being serious. Provide a shred of evidence to support your claim that "In general, atheists are selfish and don't like rules." I'll wait, but not too long....you absolute moron.
mmeasy123 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 Believing in Jesus is about believing in love...loving other people...standing up for the oppressed, the poor, the abused. Atheists choose not to believe in Jesus, so that tells me that they don't care about anyone but themselves. Others are not at the top of their priority list. That is called selfishness.
caycug1 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 Believing in God means humbling yourself before a greater power. Since atheists don't believe in God, that means they don't want to follow his rules of justice and morality. So that tells me that they don't like rules. The opposite of rules is randomness and chaos...Atheists think we randomly popped into existence...so they like chaos...not rules.
caycug1 9 months ago
@caycug1 I asked you for evidence you stupid moron. This isn't your opportunity to preach your moronic nonsense. Either provide evidence or don't make such absolutely asinine claims. I already shut you down with your "Golden Rule" idea, now you have dodged providing evidence. Either provide evidence or shut your stupid mouth. No one is interested in your bullshit.
mmeasy123 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 God loves you. I'm not saying that facetiously. He loves you just as much as He loves me. Jesus died for you, just as much as for me. His sacrifice for us is a free gift. You will never be good enough to earn your way to heaven. When we call on Him, He hears us, and will help us. Listen for His voice. He really does love you. He knows how many hairs you have on your head. He knows what you've been through, and what you are going through right now. His door is open.
caycug1 9 months ago
@caycug1 Didn't I just say no one gives a fuck about your stupid preaching bullshit? You at least concede that it was a moronic statement that "In general, atheists are selfish and don't like rules" and that you are a very stupid child for saying it. I accept your concession but now it's time for you to fuck off. I have thoroughly owned you. The proof is that you resort to your preaching nonsense when you can't provide evidence. Fuck you.
mmeasy123 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 I don't claim to be perfect. Imperfection is something that we have in common. I am a sinner, just like you. I'm not trying to "own" you.
caycug1 9 months ago
@caycug1 Fucking douche bag shut your stupid fucking face. You make stupid claims and I call you on them now you continue with your preaching bullshit. Fuck off and get the fuck out of here. Scum bag.
mmeasy123 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 just throwing a warning, your language leads you to be taken less seriously. It's not going to help with those who already think "atheists are rude bastards". It leaves a much better impression when you find someone annoying but still manage to stay polite.
Panzarkunst 9 months ago
@Panzarkunst Just throwing a warning, go fuck yourself.
mmeasy123 9 months ago
@mmeasy123 Yeah, thanks, had a nice fingering session. I don't mean you have to bend all over to be apologetic for them just so you know. But all of us atheists can speak as we like after all. Have a nice fuck you too.
Panzarkunst 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Panzarkunst " But all of us atheists can speak as we like after all."
LOL do you realize what a hypocritical douche bag moron you truly are or are you just purposely over looking it?
mmeasy123 8 months ago
this is so stupid wtf whoever liked this vid i sagains evolution screw this
Multimanjuan 10 months ago
ken ham is the fucking retard here. " all dating methods are suspect.." yet the bible isn't huh? its one 100% true cause the bible tells you so? fucking faith-heads.
fourbabies1 10 months ago
Ken Ham needs to be immediately removed from the gene pool, lest he turns evolution into de-evolution.
beerbrain420 10 months ago
@beerbrain420 yOU SEEM PRETTY SMART IN THIS BEER BRAIN HAVE YOU QUIT DRINKIN BEER OR DID YOU TAKE A SMART PILL. MR HAM DOESNT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH HAMMS BEER SO WHY YOU THERE LOSER JUST SHOWING EVERYONE HOW INTELIGANT YOU ARE OR WHAT
OregonOutlaw2000 10 months ago
@OregonOutlaw2000 You seriously need to die, troll. Teabaggers are the lowest form of life imaginable, pretty much on par with slugs. You would only be worth something if your corpse was run though a wood chipper and then your guts fed to the sharks, hopefully they wouldn't be poisoned.
beerbrain420 10 months ago
@beerbrain420 the red cross is another rip off you dumb ass freak why do you tell people to give to a rip off organization like the red cross
OregonOutlaw2000 10 months ago
@OregonOutlaw2000 It's a rip off because the founder was an Atheist? I go with the Red Cross where ever they are needed if I'm free & the work we do doesn't seem to be a rip off. Global warming isn't a myth, pull your head out of your ass.
Beopenthinkfree 10 months ago
@beerbrain420 hide the decline What a scam Mann is a idiot working with gore on global warming and the globalists with tax and trade its all a big scam for the eliet globalists to get rich selling carbon credits duh you are so dumb its embarrasing to think youre a human being and not a jack ass
OregonOutlaw2000 10 months ago
@beerbrain420 hey beer brain i have proof polar bears are cold blooded killers and need to die or evolve you know like a evolutionist lol
OregonOutlaw2000 10 months ago
@OregonOutlaw2000 Of course polar bears are cold-blooded killers. That's why I want you out drifting on an ice floe with one. ;-)
beerbrain420 10 months ago
@beerbrain420 now look what you did you pissed off a marine somone a person like you would spit on you are a loser dude do yourself a favor and join a tea party and be somebody
OregonOutlaw2000 10 months ago
3:33 Wendy Wright?
PaXx 10 months ago
it's kind of messed up that they dressed a dude up and had him act like a retard to film this.
thes1KK 10 months ago
I thought Ken ham had a beard...
maskofsan1ty 10 months ago
Live it up Mr Ham. Once your generation dies, its over. Religion is falling like a stone off a cliff, and Atheism is climbing faster than our ancestral monkeys up a tree. You can brainwash kids all you want, but they cannot escape the age of information they are being brought up in. Its only a matter of time before they realize you lied your ass off to them.
JabberCT 10 months ago
Everything you atheists write will always be false and will not rate a response. Therefor I will no longer reply to you.
goldenmessenger777 10 months ago
Everything you atheists write is false and does not rate a response.
goldenmessenger777 10 months ago
Regardless of how you feel about creationism I don't understand why impersonating a mentally handicapped person is the best way to engage Ken in a serious debate. In essence the "journalist" was mocking retarded people in order to mock Mr. Ham; so if you dislike Ken isn't the journalist equally or more offensive because of the way he exploits and parodies the mentally challenged?
ElementsUnknown 10 months ago
@ElementsUnknown people are afraid of the truth. Ken destroys people in all debates, so they mock him. Shows who is evil for sure when you have to stoop to this level of mocking.
schlabresfan 10 months ago
@schlabresfan
I'm sorry, but the theosophical equivalent of shutting his eyes and shouting "lalalala I can't hear you" does not win debates. Ken Ham gives no scientific evidence for anything, he just tries to loosely interpret anything scientific as evil so he can say it is morally wrong because he cannot provide any scientific evidence why it is wrong. That is the straw-man argument. You cannot beat an argument so you construct a weaker argument and attack that instead.
What a DOUCHE
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist you obviously have not read any of the published articles and research from the Answers in Genesis team.
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan
I have read his book The Lie: Evolution. It is ridiculous. He gives plenty of poorly reasoned arguments about why he thinks evolution is morally wrong without any evidence for why it is scientifically wrong, which is how a scientific theory should be addressed.
He gives sweeping generalisations about scientists with nothing to back those claims up. According to Ken Ham, he is the only non-biased person in the whole world.
Please provide such evidence of him winning debates.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist go to answers in Genesis website
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan
I have gone to that site. It is stupid. Every scientific dating system gives the Earth at billions of years old. Scientists are not grasping at straws when we have more than one theory, they are just admitting that they do not know. Yet.
Scientific theories should be addressed with science, fairy tales should not even come into it.
What makes the bible different from all the other holy books? Nothing. We might as well believe in pink unicorns that ride teacups around the sun.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist If u really read data you would see huge holes in evolution. I reject it because of the statistical improbability of abiogenesis. The cell is simply to complex and the DNA coding is the most advanced language system we know of. Your outright dismissal as fairy tale is a biased position because you simply reject the idea of God, not the evidence. The 10 command. for instance, would solve 90% of the worlds problems if applied.
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan The cell evolves to be more complex over billions of years, because the different molecules in it react to different chemicals and this allows the cell to adapt to different enviroments. By saying that evolution is too statistically improbable to have happened, you are making the mount improbable fallacy. Just because the end result is statistically improbable does not mean that any of thew billions of changes that have happened are impossible on their own.
Cont.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist not true...the cell has to have all it's components all at once or it cannot function, reproduce etc...at a minimum it requires energy production, replication systems, inter cell communication, waste disposal, etc...all have to have the systems there at once...this is impossible. Thus irreducible complexity virtually eliminates the possibility of abiogenesis. The more molecular biologists dig, the more complex it gets.
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan The eye was thought to bean example of irreducible complexity, but that can be explained by evolution, especially when you consider how badly 'designed' it is. They are both examples of something simple that has had more and more stuff added to it, through evolution, and these things have evolved to work together, and now they cannot survive without each other.
Another example is the Hubble telescope, which was made wrong, so something was added to correct it.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist the eye is still an example, millions of complex nerves, cones, rods, etc...we have no evidence of a simple eye, since there is no such ting. Same with cells...there is no such thing as a simple cell as I have explained. The Hubble telescope was designed, worked on and improved through intelligent design! It did not create itself through random processes. Micheal Behe's "Darwins Blackbox" is a good read on this topic. Dr. Henry Morris has several good reads as well.
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan But the eye started out as a simple photoreceptor for unicellular organisms, and over millions and billions of years more stuff was added (by evolution and natural selection), all of it working together, and now everything is needed. It is irreducibly complex, but it still can be explained via evolution.
The hubble telescope is the same, I was just using it as an example. They added the extra lens to correct it, and it is still irreducibly complex, it needs everything to work.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@schlabresfan But the eye started out as a simple photoreceptor for unicellular organisms, and over millions and billions of years more stuff was added (by evolution and natural selection), all of it working together, and now everything is needed. It is irreducibly complex, but it still can be explained via evolution.
The hubble telescope is the same, I was just using it as an example. They added the extra lens to correct it, and it is still irreducibly complex, it needs everything to work.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@schlabresfan
But the eye started out as a simple photoreceptor for unicellular organisms, and over millions and billions of years more stuff was added (by evolution and natural selection), all of it working together, and now everything is needed. It is irreducibly complex, but it still can be explained via evolution.
The hubble telescope is the same, I was just using it as an example. They added the extra lens to correct it, and it is still irreducibly complex, it needs everything to work.
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@schlabresfan Thank you for the recommendations, I will try to read those books as soon as possible. I looked them up on wikipedia, and they received very negative peer reviews, but I will read them nonetheless.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist cool.....exciting possibilities!
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan
If you want exciting possibilities then you should read The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene. It is not about evolution/creation, but about quantum physics, strong theory in an eleven dimensional universe and the origins of the universe.
It has several scientific theories for why the universe has the laws that it does, and it is an absolutely fascinating book, although it is sometimes very hard to understand.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist there is no evidence of a simple cell...we only see cells that are all vastly complex
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan A virus is a simple cell, although I concede that you have a point. However, I must point out that simpler animals have far simpler cells than humans, and besides, we only know a tiny fraction of a percentage of all the single-celled organisms, which is how complex life first arose, that are expected to exist.
I am interested in looking at both sides of the argument, so could you recommend an interesting science book about creation?
P.s. This discussion is fun.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@MegaSolipsist I commend you for being civil. Most evolutionists do nothing but mock and demean when I have discussions.
schlabresfan 4 months ago
@schlabresfan
I must thank you also for such an enjoyable conversation. I admit that most evolutionists do too much mocking, assuming themselves to be intellectually superior.
There are also far too many creationists who adopt a condescending manner and treat people like children (although given some of the posts on this site, I can understand that), or just threaten us all with eternal torment.
It is nice to have an adult conversation for a change.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago
@schlabresfan
I must thank you also for such an enjoyable conversation. I admit that most evolutionists do too much mocking, assuming themselves to be intellectually superior.
There are also far too many creationists who adopt a condescending manner and treat people like children (although given some of the posts on this site, I can understand that), or just threaten us all with eternal torment.
It is nice to have an adult conversation for a change.
:)
MegaSolipsist 4 months ago