These don't run on hydrogen, they use hydrogen (made with excess alternator power) in the fuel mixture to replace -some- of the gasoline and increase 'gas' mileage. Generating enough hydrogen to run the car on completely requires a larger unit and more power, which will drain the battery because of the overall efficiency loss. Four conversions (hydrogen -> engine -> alternator -> electricity -> hydrogen) is a massive amount of lost energy.
AND WHERE DOES THE ENERGY COME FROM TO RUN THE HOH? THE ALTERNATOR OR HOT GAS FROM THE MAYOR. WHAT MAKES THE ALTERNATOR RUN?? GASOLINE...DUHHHH. IF THIS WORKED EVERY CAR WOULD HAVE ONE BY NOW. HELL, EVERY HOME WOULD HAVE AN HOH GENERATOR FOR ELECTRIC. OPEC WOULD RETIRE AND EXXON WOULD SELL HOH GENERATORS AND CARS WOULD GET 800 MILES PER GALLON (YOU NEED A SPOON OF GAS TO START THE REACTION) IT DON'T WORK DREAMERS
The cars do not directly run on the hydrogen and oxygen, instead it is used along with gasoline to reduce fuel consumption and increase driving range.
@Weissman111 Maybe they should use bicycles and walk! It would make me feel safer especially when I hear a local Highway Patrol nutcase brag about going 120 through town on a curve with is new Dodge Charger Hemi.
Americans have no idea about high fuel costs, try paying 12 dollars a gallon like here in the uk and then you will know what high fuel prices are. You need to forget about those big V8`s, they don`t help and are totally outdated these days when we can get over 250hp out of a 4 cylinder with half the running costs
Ya, because $9 of that $12 is tax because you bend over and beg to be fucked up the ass. Then your government spends the money to boat in mass hordes of nigger savages.
Don't get me wrong the USA is totally screwed, but the UK is just beyond repair. The best you can hope for a 4th Reich in Germany to come liberate you.
@bmays005 Not sure if you know it or not but we have tried to fight them over the tax and brought the country to a standstill for a week or so a few years back. then they just threaten to bring the military in to man the fuel tankers. and god only knows what happend to the leaders of the protest, nobody has seen them since, guess they were got at
@plaugewolf did you ever make a small Erlenmeyer flask of hydrogen go 'POP' in chem? That's about the size of it, about 300.ml since the gas is created continuously not stored. It is stored as water, which is non-flammable ;)
The waterengine was developed in the1960s ... EXXON wanted to buy the idea from its designer who refused to sell it ... A contract was then put on the guys head who eventually went into witness protection and started working for NASA. The Same goes for free electrical power invented in the late 1920s where the scientist was mysteriously killed in a fire that distroyed all his work . Its time we all became aware of the ROthschild/Rockefeller Zionists that are holding us all to ransom! WAKE UP!
Yes of course an internal combustion engine will run on Hydrogen gas, BUT---BUT---BUT--- what these cute little videos are NOT telling you is that it takes MORE POWER to extract it from the water than it returns as a fuel. There's nothing new about electrolosis, it's an older technology than any living human. But this stuff about "secret processes" is snake oil in the first degree. Reminds me of the fabled 100 mpg carburetor of the 70's, it's a great fantasy, but fantasies are unreal.
The BS just seems to be endless. What they're peddling with this foolishness is a pipedream referred to as "over unity", which quite simply does not exist (at least on this plane.) What that involves is getting more out of something than nature put into it. Use your feeble brain, if such a system existed the oil companies would joyously pay multiple billions of dollars for it, screw all that expensive drilling and refining. Get real folks, no such system exists.
Finally a town run by people who give a shit. This video gives me hope. Watch a film called "gashole" on documentarywire dot(com and learn the truth about why this type of technology and others like it have been suppressed for a half century.
Im against the use of water in any vehicle any way because water is the most valuable element out there, i look couple of hundred years in the future and the generation at that time would hate us for letting the start of this kind of consumption. yes i know there is alot of water in our planet but i dont like the idea..
Anybody watching Japan melt to the ground........dont you think they would like an alternate power source.........just send over some jam jars and stainless steel and save the entire Island.
HHO systems are a joke. They split water to make HHO. They consume water at a surprising rate. Get a system and you will be opening your engine hood four times a day to keep the reservoir full.
Oh not this BS again. Look. I've done lots of research on HHO, built quite a few units myself using more than just jam jars filled with water. This crap does not work. It will freeze in the winter. It does nothing to increase mileage. It also requires caustic soda to create any reaction which when put into the air supply causes intake and engine damage.
There is a sucker born every minute. Do not waste your money.
If you want to really increase mileage, look into aerodynamic mods. They work.
The generators use more energy than they create, this is a fact. No gains can be expected from this. Not speaking of what I have read, what I have personally tested.
Everything on a car is made with or constructed by oil. Every machine required oil to manufacture the parts. Rubber is made with HUGE amounts of oil. The car will need oil to lubricate it, all plastic was made with oil. I don't see oil going anywhere but UP
@gojoe36 Well then lets try to use oil where it has to and use more practical methods of getting our energy and products wherever we can. What if you charge your vehicle at home with a wind turbine and use that power to run your hho generator. Like an electric vehicle.
@bmays005 I don't understand why people think that you can create hydrogen and oxygen by putting in energy and then magically get more energy out of it when you burn it... These cars all probably work just because gas cars don't make use out of the energy released while breaking. I bet they make the hydrogen by regenerative breaking. The same principle of saving energy as in the Toyota Prius.
@TheTrueJBV3737 answer: what mythbusters attempt? I've tried doing it at home but that would not prove shit. the fact is simply that you need energy to convert the water. and that you get part of the enrgy back when burning the gasses.
@SVKmellow when you separate a compound it releases the energy it had that was holding it together. The force of H exploded to run a alternator is enough to create more power than what was used to separate the first batch. The emission is O from H2O. E=mc2 was used to make the hydrogen bomb in ww2, inwhich the chain reaction creates more chain reactions. Your not creating power out of thin air, your simply seperating then burning the result that's locked within.
@TheTrueJBV3737 ooooh really? and here I thought you'd need energy to pull apart particles that stay together due to forces of attraction. silly me. I forgot about all the rainbows and unicorns.
Actually true clinical research of marijuana hasn't really been done. We're pretty confident we understand THC well enough, but then there are CBN's, CBD's, and other cannabinoids that are understood only by popular "private study" (people smoking and saying how they feel). You're right, smoke does harm your lungs. That's why we need to seriously look at the effects of ingesting marijuana and it's compounds. h**p://norml.org/component/zoo/category/recent-research-on-medical-marijuana
very misleading video and title, they used the fuelcell in addition! to regular fuel, not as a replacement. Regular gasoline combustion does not burn all the gas in the chamber, adding HHO into the chamber causes more of the fuel to be ignited, thus increasing efficiency and reducing emission.
WRONR TECH!!!! WTF are we going to DRINK when we have burned up all the H2O on the planet? We are better off with the Hydrogen fuel cell which recombines HH and O to produce electricity and water vapor. THIS IS NOT THE ANSWER TO OWR ENERGY PROBLEMS!!!
@DailyStaley Yes, it is fucking incredible. Problem is, there are laws saying that you can't make hydrogen without a license.
Why? Because if we ran our cars on water, we wouldn't be paying the taxes on gas. The tax goes to the city, state.
Poof!
We the consumer can save, but you can't do it.
Same with marijuana. Chemicals in pot cure and/or stop some cancers. But the feds won't allow you to use it, because millions would be lost in the hospital bills, jobs.
@AzBirdDog Ohh yeah I know i'm all for the legalization of Mary hah my grampa actually just got a very mild skin form of skin cancer and we're giving him some good hash oil now instead of his chemo cream! But it's just shocking, if this engine can be used to power cars.. we can have water..power plants!? Am I right? The future doesn't look so bad anymore.. the word needs to be spread about HHO!
@AzBirdDog they restrict hydrogen production because its a very explosive gas, and they dont want another Hindenburg, or people to make bombs, or accidents.
they ban marijuana because they believe it to be a harmful and poisonous drug, which is of course bullshit. but they still see marijuana being a "Drug" like cocaine and heroin. so they fear it and ban it to be safe.
point is, people are stupid and afraid, and the lawmakers rarely educate themselves before making sessions
@AzBirdDog What a bunch of BS. Laws agains making hydrogen? hahahaha
Pretty much every school on this planet will show electrolysis of water in physics class. It's such a common experiment, but I guess you weren't in school.
Also: medicinal marijuana is commonly used on several illnesses.
@Nopiw try looking it up, fuck face. The law states that you can't mass produce hydrogen without a license. If you knew anything about the history of hydrogen assist technology, you would've known this. Instead you resort to acting like a little boy.
Plus, if you read anything on medical marijuana, you would have known that it's not legal in every state.
Fucking DUH!
We all know itt's being used, Captain Lameass. We're speaking about the illegalities of it.
@AzBirdDog Mass produce is not what you said simpleton. Of course it's restriced and it's logical why. Imagine one of your kind mass produce it and simply fill it in some big ol tank you've found at the junkyard... what could possibly go wrong, right?
You'd endanger the whole neighborhood!
By the way, I can read quite good, but it looks like you have problems using your brain for things like thinking and stuff.
@AzBirdDog i smoke weed all the time and i just dont believe that it cures cancer or prevents it, where ur proof for saying this wild claim ? ( any form of smoke being inhaled is bad for you period )
@TheHalfordFreak Guess what? You're wrong. Look it up on google. There's actual scientific studies that prove that the chemicals in pot either slow down or stop certain types of cancer. And yes, smoke does harm your lungs. But we're not talking about smoking. There are other ways of extracting chemicals from it. Period.
The proof has been witnessed by doctors with 40 years of practicing medicine.
Some of the biggest universities have tested and founf this out.
@TheHalfordFreak There's a method of soaking, grinding and I believe heating the plants leaves to extract the chemicals inside the plant.
Right now, there's a lotion that contains hemp oils from the marijuana plant.
Please, just look it up. You'll find out for yourself that there are substances inside of pot that you can use in a multitude of ways. And yes, Doctors with 50 years in the field of medicine have found that used certain ways, it can stop cancer.
@AzBirdDog um.. uno problemo... youi get pot oil from marijuana and Hemp opil from the hemp plant... other then that, your right, its capable of healing just like pot.
@AzBirdDog but are those "certain ways" available to every day average income pot smokers or do you have to have a big lab to extract the shit like think about it....bong/joint or take how ever long it takes to extract it all and do what needs to be done in this large process it all comes down to could we do it in our own home with no extra parts or expenses
@TheHalfordFreak nope, you don't inhale smoke so it doesn't damage your lungs. and there aren't any negative effects, in fact, the only negative thing is that you have to wait for a while for it to start working, but the high lasts longer.
@nikolafilip15022000 actually i read up on eating pot brownies and it is no healthier for you because the pot enters your blood stream instead of the lungs thus infecting all organs and not just one (lungs) but it is a way more intense high. and not that pot is very bad for you any ways i recently quit due to cardio issues (i smoked with alot of tobe) i think i might start back up again in the future but just never mix tobe or use
@AzBirdDog your facts are distorted and you have no valid sources other than google. i can google and find info on anything I want to be true without proof. I can even skip over valid info and believe propaganda. God doesn't make mistakes. Natural cannabis is not man made. But hey, keep popping your opiates and synthetically made drugs and believing that those things are perfectly good for you. When you get off the dope, compare the side effects of the 2. Someday MJ may just save your life too
@AzBirdDog coulnd have said it better,, they will kill you before letting this technology out..
best example is Stan Meyers... he got it working, died the next day from food poisoning. Perfectly healthy man died from food poisoning in less then a day..
sounds like we have to get 1 million ppl using it, they cant hide it at that point.
@g7txu do yourself a little favour and lookup BMW Hydrogen 7 its a car that runs on hydrogen or gasoline at a flick of a button.. Jay Lano has one..
well there's your not working up in hydrogen so to speak..
the other part is basic electrolysis, lookup HHO Drycell and you will then know is more then possible to generate enough Hydrogen by splitting it from WATER
so you agree you absoloutly cant run you car on water, I agree totally
@Me102288 So what makes you think I'm not aware of the Hydrogen 7 ? For all you know, I might have even designed it. We all know that you can reduce water into it's component elements of Hydrogen and Oxygen, but doing so requires an endothermic reaction. Unless you derive the input of this reaction from a renewable energy source, the concept is unworkable. These idiot pigs were probably fooled into fitting these by some religious nutjob like Dennis Lee.
@g7txu reduce uh, do you even know how easy it is to spil hydrogen and oxygen out of water.. the energy source is electricity for the alternater of the engine..
these "idiot pigs" are using an accelerent.. Oxygen, with another highly explosive Hydrogen and adding some to gasoline, while taking SOME gasoline out.
this is called replacing one not so good combustable fuel with a much better one.
If you knew any better, this is exactly what NOS does as well,
@AzBirdDog -.- You can't make hydrogen illegal... It is the most common element in the universe. Second only to dark matter.
Anyway HHO systems are crap. They only work properly on diesel engines. Currently there are only 2 diesel cars sold on the US market by BMW and Volkswagen.
Also hydrogen causes aluminum alloy and iron blocks to become extremely brittle. At some point the blocks can become warped or the connecting rod will crack/snap. It has no effect on gas engines besides the damage.
does this really work??!?! has someone experiences with that?!?! please post a serious documented video, based on facts which explains the whole physics!! if someone knows how to do this: please share your nowledge!!! peace
I'd dare say this isn't true hydrolosis. even with a large tank of water and increadably powerful battery the amount of hydrogen produced isn't enough to power a car for a long period of time. however, I can't claim to be an expert on this, I've just done a few tests on this kinda stuff when I was in college.
Running om something experimental... Experiements fail, they say its running... LOL... NEWS is all manipulation..... it kinda works, yet they show ya it running?
Are we really getn to be that stupid now?
Man, Turn off TV and spend time in the lab, we need to be free for real...
@RobMonty248 there are many people who do it now them selves - no complicated science involved - water - two metal conductors (metal sheets) soda for better conductivity - few ventiles in piping to prevent blowback - a storage tank if u need one - or if u can produce some 2 l of gas in a minute - i am pretty shure- a 2 or 3 liter can can run fully - have seen a lot of videos showing people testing - explaining and sharing details
Interesting idea... I feel like there are some dangers though. First, hydrogen is more explosive than gasoline, which translates to more wear on the engine parts. Same reason you shouldn't fill up an average car with high octane fuel all the time. Secondly, if your hydrogen gas leaks, you have a situation that could result in an explosion or fire. Third, the electricity still has to come from somewhere. Granted, those actually aren't huge hurtles, but still.
@MetalMavrik hydrogen is 5-7 times more powerful then pump gas and way way more explosive thought this whole system has been know for years on end some people are still shocked by it because they have never gotten out of there house I guess! many people have tried this and some have resulted in explosions so this is still potentially unhealthy for you and you can get electricity free from solar panels and then store but that only works in small amounts if every one used this..ouch
16 - 24 MPG?? Holy moly.. how is it possible in this day and age to design and produce an engine that badly?
It would make more sense for these guys to stop wasting money on snake oil, and replace their current vehicle stock with stuff that wasn't hammered together in a shed.
@Furrowbrow Police seem to use powerful vehicles. If you take a car w/v8 and stop and go 200x/day i think 16mpg would b pretty good.lol. But seriously i think the mayor realizes by now he was scammed by hho like a lot of others. Dont quite understand why his "research"(lol) didnt simply include installing it on one vehicle and actually giving it a fair honest test.
@901Jetta Are u aquainted with the phone? lol . Google this town (Honea Path SC), get mayors ph # (Lollis Meyers) and inquire about his hho project. Took me all of 10 minutes, guber. Grow up.
Just talked to this mayor. They have discontinued using hho generators on their police cars. To hard to get the officers to keep up with day to day maintenance. Mayor says he still uses on personal vehicle--increases gas mileage from aprox 16 to 24.
I am very skeptical. Vid implied that reason 4 using this was the cities bad finacial situation. They found something that could cut their total city fuel bills by 33% but they are not using it????! :-) ;')
@ tampicokeed Your comment came through to my e-mail, but didn't show up on the video. NASA was trying to identify a phenomenon created through hydrocarbon+hydrogen combustion. Flame expansion of hydrogen and hydrocarbons occur at a similar rate. When the two are added the flame speed increases dramatically resulting in lower energy loss in the exhaust and lower manifold temperatures. The study was done for the Air Force I believe.
@Ziji1 Thanks 4 yur reply, i had read ur earlier coments nd they answerd my ?s. Nice 2 see coments that cum fr reality. U realze by now i am a skeptic about thes hho systms. Bring up a conspracy theory and uv lost me. lol. I wuld need a real, honest,test done with hho installd, and not installd, with severl disinterestd observrs etc etc. Thes sys hav ben since th 70s. I hav nevr seen or heard of test that showd + results. Hav u dun such a test? This vid fails on to many levls. :-) ;-) Chrismas!
@Ziji1 A heads up about NASA study.It used640g/hr H in its experiment.
Typical HHO gen makes 2L/min=120L/hr.
HHO gas is .67% H. H is .09g/L. Thus amount of H made by ave HHO gen is: (120L/hr)(.67)(.09g/L)=7.2g/hr.
Thus on 7.4L eng with typical HHOgen u r supplyng only 7.2/640=1.15%as much H as the test used. But if u put same gen on 2.5L eng, that figure would be 3.45%
U would hav to install 30 typical HHO gens on 2.5L eng to =fuel to H ratio in NASA test.
Never studied it but maybe there is something chemically going on inside the combustion chamber. Maybe the introduction of hydrogen and oxygen makes a more even burn you don't know. If they say it works it probally does
Vehicles have an endless cycle of electricity. Plus these take about 3 amps so its no worse than turning your radio on. The alternator is going to produce the same amount of power as it would without it at any rpm range. Obviously going to make more electricity at higher engine rpm.
I had a car a few years ago with this Hydro Converter thingy. It was very efficient on fuel, and I only had to top up the water every couple of weeks (took less than 500ml).
Seems they would have to exhaust the oxygen and use only the hydrogen since the oxygen sensor would tell the cars computer to adjust the fuel mixture if the oxygen was used.
@MattBlytheTheOne G'day... Well, y're both almost half right, as it happens..! Point 1, Auto Alt's are only 2.5%-3.5% Fuel- Efficient (due to Belted Step-Up). So I retrofitted a streamlined Solar Panel & saved 35% of my Pre-Mod. fuelburn, with more Torque to the Gearbox, too. Search 'SunFoil Science'... Point 2, a bit of HHO makes combustion more efficient. So, a 2nd PV, 2nd Batt., a 6-Cell Hydrolyser run off Solar-Power only. Try that !
@textiles1 ....So? It only works while you drive then? I would guess it is hooked upto your battery, not the alternator. If it is the alternator it is even dumber than I thought....so every hour of driving you get a liter of HHO? So what, that is about 100 feet of driving....
@tubiejonny It is called "free" power if you use your alternator. Of course you will never run your car on 100% Hydrogen because it is not efficient. In that case you use gas to start up your car and the generator just helps the gas mileage.
@tubiejonny It is called "free" power if you use your alternator. Of course you will never run your car on 100% Hydrogen because it is not efficient. In that case you use gas to start up your car and the generator just helps the gas mileage.
@MattBlytheTheOne You miss the point....if it takes the equivalant of 200 litres of gas to separate 4ozs of water into HHO, would you still like the idea of running a car on water. You aren't gaining any energy, you are just converting it and taking a loss at each conversion.
@tubiejonny dude the engine produces enough power to generate electrolysis, and the result is increased fuel efficiency. Instead of gas you add water! How is that a waste?
@tubiejonny the alternator is producing the electricty ALL THE TIME the engine is running, what the car doesn't use gets wasted, at least when you are producing electrolysis you are converting the energy to good use. You are increasing fuel efficiency but you are not depleting the battery. The only cost is the price of water. But even then, when you add water you save that much on fuel bills.... That WHICH IS IT lol.
@MrDawggie Wrong....it puts drag on the serpintine belt, which loads down the engine causing it to burn more gas....its just converting gas power into HHO power with a loss at the conversion.
@tonyjfalconeajutube Its clear that you must be ignorant about this topic. Why don't you just take the gas out of the equation then and have an engine powered by HHO and all this excess energy you speak of can go towards making more HHO....I will tell you why so you don't go around thinking you have solved the worlds energy problems....its because that would be propetual motion and it is imposible.....2nd law of thermodynamics pal.
@tubiejonny Ok. Go read the NASA publication on the issue. The data shows hydrogen enabling energy conservation in the combustion process. Nobody claimed hydrogen is adding energy in this system. NASA found that hybrid systems lost 43 hp to exhaust while gas systems lost 68 hp to exhaust. Not a bad turn around for a 3 hp loss to hydrogen conversion. 42% of an ICE's energy is lost to exhaust. Hydrogen helps recover up to 1/3 of that otherwise lost energy.
What is the long term results. Where did you buy it. What iwas the cost. thanks
stockman1963 1 day ago
These don't run on hydrogen, they use hydrogen (made with excess alternator power) in the fuel mixture to replace -some- of the gasoline and increase 'gas' mileage. Generating enough hydrogen to run the car on completely requires a larger unit and more power, which will drain the battery because of the overall efficiency loss. Four conversions (hydrogen -> engine -> alternator -> electricity -> hydrogen) is a massive amount of lost energy.
TheOJDrinker 2 days ago
The govt gets to use water for their cars and we don't ? FUCK YOU WASHINGTON DC! Revolution is coming !
Pissed0ffPatriot 2 days ago
AND WHERE DOES THE ENERGY COME FROM TO RUN THE HOH? THE ALTERNATOR OR HOT GAS FROM THE MAYOR. WHAT MAKES THE ALTERNATOR RUN?? GASOLINE...DUHHHH. IF THIS WORKED EVERY CAR WOULD HAVE ONE BY NOW. HELL, EVERY HOME WOULD HAVE AN HOH GENERATOR FOR ELECTRIC. OPEC WOULD RETIRE AND EXXON WOULD SELL HOH GENERATORS AND CARS WOULD GET 800 MILES PER GALLON (YOU NEED A SPOON OF GAS TO START THE REACTION) IT DON'T WORK DREAMERS
VITATTA 3 days ago
Ok... Now we can call off the upcoming war in Iran! (yea right).
ronjamesorchestra 6 days ago
The cars do not directly run on the hydrogen and oxygen, instead it is used along with gasoline to reduce fuel consumption and increase driving range.
starshock01 1 week ago
Perhaps they should use smaller cars that use less fuel in the first place rather than these massive thirsty behemoths.
Weissman111 1 week ago
@Weissman111 Maybe they should use bicycles and walk! It would make me feel safer especially when I hear a local Highway Patrol nutcase brag about going 120 through town on a curve with is new Dodge Charger Hemi.
ObsessedCyclist 6 days ago
Americans have no idea about high fuel costs, try paying 12 dollars a gallon like here in the uk and then you will know what high fuel prices are. You need to forget about those big V8`s, they don`t help and are totally outdated these days when we can get over 250hp out of a 4 cylinder with half the running costs
tomasbobby 2 weeks ago
@tomasbobby
Ya, because $9 of that $12 is tax because you bend over and beg to be fucked up the ass. Then your government spends the money to boat in mass hordes of nigger savages.
Don't get me wrong the USA is totally screwed, but the UK is just beyond repair. The best you can hope for a 4th Reich in Germany to come liberate you.
bmays005 1 week ago
@bmays005 Not sure if you know it or not but we have tried to fight them over the tax and brought the country to a standstill for a week or so a few years back. then they just threaten to bring the military in to man the fuel tankers. and god only knows what happend to the leaders of the protest, nobody has seen them since, guess they were got at
tomasbobby 1 week ago
cant wait for the high speed chase when the cop crashes and his car blows up from the stored hydrogen.
plaugewolf 2 weeks ago
@plaugewolf The hydrogen gets used soon as its created mostly so there is no tank.
ARBuilder1776 2 weeks ago in playlist Water Car
@plaugewolf did you ever make a small Erlenmeyer flask of hydrogen go 'POP' in chem? That's about the size of it, about 300.ml since the gas is created continuously not stored. It is stored as water, which is non-flammable ;)
captainTubes 6 days ago
6-8 mile per GALLON Jes my VW does 35-40mpg on average - downside your vehicles man
TheOriginalJoeBloggs 2 weeks ago
The waterengine was developed in the1960s ... EXXON wanted to buy the idea from its designer who refused to sell it ... A contract was then put on the guys head who eventually went into witness protection and started working for NASA. The Same goes for free electrical power invented in the late 1920s where the scientist was mysteriously killed in a fire that distroyed all his work . Its time we all became aware of the ROthschild/Rockefeller Zionists that are holding us all to ransom! WAKE UP!
FriendshipProject1 2 weeks ago 3
Why can't people believe this? Anyone remember steam engines? Nothing new here, it's the oldest engine in the world.
jlarsena 2 weeks ago
Nothing new there. I witnessed the same thing in England, where water was added to aid the double-deck buses to make more milage..
YTfanofclips 2 weeks ago
They should ride bikes and get some exercise.
schratboy 2 weeks ago
Yes of course an internal combustion engine will run on Hydrogen gas, BUT---BUT---BUT--- what these cute little videos are NOT telling you is that it takes MORE POWER to extract it from the water than it returns as a fuel. There's nothing new about electrolosis, it's an older technology than any living human. But this stuff about "secret processes" is snake oil in the first degree. Reminds me of the fabled 100 mpg carburetor of the 70's, it's a great fantasy, but fantasies are unreal.
GANNAMEDE 2 weeks ago
The BS just seems to be endless. What they're peddling with this foolishness is a pipedream referred to as "over unity", which quite simply does not exist (at least on this plane.) What that involves is getting more out of something than nature put into it. Use your feeble brain, if such a system existed the oil companies would joyously pay multiple billions of dollars for it, screw all that expensive drilling and refining. Get real folks, no such system exists.
GANNAMEDE 2 weeks ago
Finally a town run by people who give a shit. This video gives me hope. Watch a film called "gashole" on documentarywire dot(com and learn the truth about why this type of technology and others like it have been suppressed for a half century.
wheelmanstan 2 weeks ago
Im against the use of water in any vehicle any way because water is the most valuable element out there, i look couple of hundred years in the future and the generation at that time would hate us for letting the start of this kind of consumption. yes i know there is alot of water in our planet but i dont like the idea..
ashiinsane90 2 weeks ago
@ashiinsane90 There's a hell of a lot more water than oil. Plus, it probably doesn't pollute.
8bitRicky 2 weeks ago
@ashiinsane90
The hydrogen and oxygen that came FROM the water get turned back INTO water. Basic chemistry... No loss, no harm done. :)
tvr390se 2 weeks ago
Yeah, and then if regular citizens try to do that it will suddenly be illegal and you get thrown in jail.
JadedFyre 2 weeks ago
I love how a video about hydrolysis turned into a marijuana discussion.
HIIIIIIIIIIIIJAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKEEEEEEEEEEED
MausTanker 2 weeks ago 7
Too bad we can't make a car that runs on bullshit because youtube is an endless supply of fuel.
Fend4urself 2 weeks ago
Anybody watching Japan melt to the ground........dont you think they would like an alternate power source.........just send over some jam jars and stainless steel and save the entire Island.
newmrv 2 weeks ago
I built one of these systems and put it on my Dodge Van. I went from 13mpg to 18mpg with a brute force HHO. Just saying......
Padre3549 2 weeks ago
HHO systems are a joke. They split water to make HHO. They consume water at a surprising rate. Get a system and you will be opening your engine hood four times a day to keep the reservoir full.
buttkracken 2 weeks ago
@buttkracken learn what Happens after its burned..
Hydrogen is an energy CARRIER.. after all the energy is burnt out of it its STILL Hydrogen.. what happens when Hydrogen contacts Oxygen?
H2O ... water. Einstien said it himself a VERY long time ago.. 30 kilograms of water has the pontential energy of 30 MILLION GALLONS of gasoline.
"they" no, some.. consume more water because the run to hot. Coil cells like this are very inefficient compared to a drycell.
Me102288 2 weeks ago
Oil is a hormone to modern living
1okanaganguy 2 weeks ago
The USA is addicted to killing, not oil. There is no way they'd stop using oil, so long as there are people to be killed for it.
GrassPossum 2 weeks ago
Oh not this BS again. Look. I've done lots of research on HHO, built quite a few units myself using more than just jam jars filled with water. This crap does not work. It will freeze in the winter. It does nothing to increase mileage. It also requires caustic soda to create any reaction which when put into the air supply causes intake and engine damage.
There is a sucker born every minute. Do not waste your money.
If you want to really increase mileage, look into aerodynamic mods. They work.
MrStevilKneivel 2 weeks ago
Where do you buy these kits?
mscir 2 weeks ago
WTF THEY ARE INVADING THE WRONG F***ING PLACES ITS NOT IRAQ N LIBIA CANADAS GOT ALL THE LAKES....JEEZ...
dominicrichfield 2 weeks ago
The generators use more energy than they create, this is a fact. No gains can be expected from this. Not speaking of what I have read, what I have personally tested.
2012nugget 2 weeks ago
Everything on a car is made with or constructed by oil. Every machine required oil to manufacture the parts. Rubber is made with HUGE amounts of oil. The car will need oil to lubricate it, all plastic was made with oil. I don't see oil going anywhere but UP
gojoe36 3 weeks ago in playlist Gas saver for engine
@gojoe36 Well then lets try to use oil where it has to and use more practical methods of getting our energy and products wherever we can. What if you charge your vehicle at home with a wind turbine and use that power to run your hho generator. Like an electric vehicle.
zekhariah 2 weeks ago
wypiją cały Atlantyk i będzie po zawodach zdechną z pragnienia
kamrat40 3 weeks ago
lol mayor probably died mysteriously the next day
bmays005 3 weeks ago 18
@bmays005 he was poisoned in a restaurant after signing a deal with the military,collapsed in the parking lot-saying "they poisoned me"
SHARKREEF2011 2 weeks ago
@bmays005 I don't understand why people think that you can create hydrogen and oxygen by putting in energy and then magically get more energy out of it when you burn it... These cars all probably work just because gas cars don't make use out of the energy released while breaking. I bet they make the hydrogen by regenerative breaking. The same principle of saving energy as in the Toyota Prius.
SVKmellow 1 week ago
@SVKmellow
Makes the fuel burn more thoroughly increasing engine efficiency.
bmays005 1 week ago
@bmays005 ??? I like turtles!
SVKmellow 1 week ago
@SVKmellow E=MC2 bitch.
TheTrueJBV3737 1 week ago
@TheTrueJBV3737 It's bs. Einstein was wrong.
ObsessedCyclist 6 days ago
@ObsessedCyclist your an idiot go back to school.
TheTrueJBV3737 5 days ago
@TheTrueJBV3737 right on mofo! but I'm still right, playa! pics, or it didn't happen!
SVKmellow 4 days ago
@SVKmellow so have you tried HHO, not just watching Mythbusters retarded attempt?
TheTrueJBV3737 4 days ago
@TheTrueJBV3737 answer: what mythbusters attempt? I've tried doing it at home but that would not prove shit. the fact is simply that you need energy to convert the water. and that you get part of the enrgy back when burning the gasses.
SVKmellow 3 days ago
@SVKmellow when you separate a compound it releases the energy it had that was holding it together. The force of H exploded to run a alternator is enough to create more power than what was used to separate the first batch. The emission is O from H2O. E=mc2 was used to make the hydrogen bomb in ww2, inwhich the chain reaction creates more chain reactions. Your not creating power out of thin air, your simply seperating then burning the result that's locked within.
TheTrueJBV3737 3 days ago
@TheTrueJBV3737 ooooh really? and here I thought you'd need energy to pull apart particles that stay together due to forces of attraction. silly me. I forgot about all the rainbows and unicorns.
SVKmellow 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid. Who needs a cell whan you got a rad full of water.
jocell202 3 weeks ago
The laws of thermodynamics are obviously a government conspiracy to prop up the oil companies.
ghuegel 3 weeks ago
Actually true clinical research of marijuana hasn't really been done. We're pretty confident we understand THC well enough, but then there are CBN's, CBD's, and other cannabinoids that are understood only by popular "private study" (people smoking and saying how they feel). You're right, smoke does harm your lungs. That's why we need to seriously look at the effects of ingesting marijuana and it's compounds. h**p://norml.org/component/zoo/category/recent-research-on-medical-marijuana
FfejTball 3 weeks ago
Umm, its mixing hydrogen made by electrolysis in with standard gas, how is that running on water?
kalijasin 3 weeks ago
HA!! and they said it would never work Igor!....
TheTagzen 3 weeks ago
Water powered engine will be the fall of the Arabs
vincearizala 3 weeks ago
very misleading video and title, they used the fuelcell in addition! to regular fuel, not as a replacement. Regular gasoline combustion does not burn all the gas in the chamber, adding HHO into the chamber causes more of the fuel to be ignited, thus increasing efficiency and reducing emission.
GublyGubly 1 month ago
would it work in the winter and freezing weather?
icefiredragon1 1 month ago
@icefiredragon1 the only cheap and non additive way that i can see to do this is to keep the water moving
davadization 1 month ago
yeah, free energy, for sure...
maximilianlindner 1 month ago
see the first and/or second laws of thermodynamics.
jizburg 1 month ago
This is works! And there is a US Department of Transportation Report - on thier HOW TO page ( 75news com) ...
HOW2WHITENyelowTEETH 1 month ago
HOAX
Go to wikipedia and look for "Water-fuelled car"
they are scams looking for investors to bilk
jburdman7 1 month ago
awesome. this guy should be president.
ballickmoyler 1 month ago
is the mayor still alive?????
rome71rome 1 month ago
Still putting more energy in than your getting out. I bet there alternators started burning out too.
dumass00072 1 month ago
youtube scientists improve the IC engine... Im amazed...no one thought of this earlier
LOPEZdJUNGLIST 1 month ago
If a police dept is testing it then it must be working?
Well they did not continue with it because it was a failure...(But i guess no one wants to hear that)
drijfkip1 1 month ago
WRONR TECH!!!! WTF are we going to DRINK when we have burned up all the H2O on the planet? We are better off with the Hydrogen fuel cell which recombines HH and O to produce electricity and water vapor. THIS IS NOT THE ANSWER TO OWR ENERGY PROBLEMS!!!
AdarondacMountainMan 1 month ago
@AdarondacMountainMan water will reform itself naturally, most of the hydrogen cars emit water vapor if not all hydrogen cars.
you can't get rid of all the water. it just rebuilds itself from the excess hydrogen and oxygen
chubbs636 1 month ago
I don't see anything laughable about it,trains used to run on water.
apetrowsky1 1 month ago
@apetrowsky1 steam engines used coal or wood as fuel.
motopack 1 month ago
@motopack It's pretty much the same concept.
apetrowsky1 1 month ago
Police can make it legal but normal people can't...
Garpk2 1 month ago
Misleading title. It uses electrolysis and feeds the HHO into the air intake. This vehicle uses gasoline.
kokopelli314 1 month ago
Thats fucking incredible..
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley Yes, it is fucking incredible. Problem is, there are laws saying that you can't make hydrogen without a license.
Why? Because if we ran our cars on water, we wouldn't be paying the taxes on gas. The tax goes to the city, state.
Poof!
We the consumer can save, but you can't do it.
Same with marijuana. Chemicals in pot cure and/or stop some cancers. But the feds won't allow you to use it, because millions would be lost in the hospital bills, jobs.
Read on it, you'll be disgusted.
AzBirdDog 1 month ago 35
@AzBirdDog Ohh yeah I know i'm all for the legalization of Mary hah my grampa actually just got a very mild skin form of skin cancer and we're giving him some good hash oil now instead of his chemo cream! But it's just shocking, if this engine can be used to power cars.. we can have water..power plants!? Am I right? The future doesn't look so bad anymore.. the word needs to be spread about HHO!
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley I bet you're hangin out at grandpa's house more than you used to eh?
Fend4urself 2 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog they restrict hydrogen production because its a very explosive gas, and they dont want another Hindenburg, or people to make bombs, or accidents.
they ban marijuana because they believe it to be a harmful and poisonous drug, which is of course bullshit. but they still see marijuana being a "Drug" like cocaine and heroin. so they fear it and ban it to be safe.
point is, people are stupid and afraid, and the lawmakers rarely educate themselves before making sessions
chubbs636 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog except youre not making hydrogen, youre making Oxyhydrogen so perfectly legal lol
radicalphantom1 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog dont forget with pot being illegal and meny people use it, its the perfect exuse to breach the 4th ammendment
libertytooth 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog What a bunch of BS. Laws agains making hydrogen? hahahaha
Pretty much every school on this planet will show electrolysis of water in physics class. It's such a common experiment, but I guess you weren't in school.
Also: medicinal marijuana is commonly used on several illnesses.
Nopiw 1 month ago
@Nopiw try looking it up, fuck face. The law states that you can't mass produce hydrogen without a license. If you knew anything about the history of hydrogen assist technology, you would've known this. Instead you resort to acting like a little boy.
Plus, if you read anything on medical marijuana, you would have known that it's not legal in every state.
Fucking DUH!
We all know itt's being used, Captain Lameass. We're speaking about the illegalities of it.
I guess you never learned to read.
AzBirdDog 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog Mass produce is not what you said simpleton. Of course it's restriced and it's logical why. Imagine one of your kind mass produce it and simply fill it in some big ol tank you've found at the junkyard... what could possibly go wrong, right?
You'd endanger the whole neighborhood!
By the way, I can read quite good, but it looks like you have problems using your brain for things like thinking and stuff.
smoke weed errday
Nopiw 1 month ago
@Nopiw What a cock eyed dumbass. I nailed you as being wrong, and now you're changing your arguement. LOL
Go back to sucking your dad off, bitch.
You have no arguement and the shit keeps flowing out of your ears and mouth.
Come back to the arguement when you've read the restrictions.
Fucking lameass.
AzBirdDog 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog u mad bro?
btw, can you can't even keep to your own BS for more than a sentence.
"now you're changing your argument"
"You have no arguement"
"come back to the argument"
oh boy, you're messed up in the head
Nopiw 1 month ago
@Nopiw Thank you for agreeing that you don't know jack shit about what you're saying.
Now you're attacking the words I use.
LOL, absolutely PATHETIC.
And no, i'm not your fucked up "bro."
I am several levels above that, thank you.
AzBirdDog 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog Wow, I've never spoken to someone who is several levels above fucked up. That explains everything and I hope you get the help you need.
Nopiw 1 month ago
@Nopiw And now you have resorted to talking with yourself. LOL
What took place in your pathetic childhood, to make you come out like a babbling nutjob that you are?
God damned troll training force is strong with you.
You've brought your retarded arguement all the way to attacking me, now that you know that you were wrong. LOL
Your parents failed on raising you. Okay troll.
Time to hit the ignore button on you.
Your "Bro" mentality has taken enough of my time, Bro.
LOL
Seeya!
AzBirdDog 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog i smoke weed all the time and i just dont believe that it cures cancer or prevents it, where ur proof for saying this wild claim ? ( any form of smoke being inhaled is bad for you period )
TheHalfordFreak 1 month ago
@TheHalfordFreak Guess what? You're wrong. Look it up on google. There's actual scientific studies that prove that the chemicals in pot either slow down or stop certain types of cancer. And yes, smoke does harm your lungs. But we're not talking about smoking. There are other ways of extracting chemicals from it. Period.
The proof has been witnessed by doctors with 40 years of practicing medicine.
Some of the biggest universities have tested and founf this out.
Period. Look it up.
AzBirdDog 1 month ago 29
@AzBirdDog soo how do u consume the pot in a way that is not bad for you ? vap ?
TheHalfordFreak 1 month ago
@TheHalfordFreak There's a method of soaking, grinding and I believe heating the plants leaves to extract the chemicals inside the plant.
Right now, there's a lotion that contains hemp oils from the marijuana plant.
Please, just look it up. You'll find out for yourself that there are substances inside of pot that you can use in a multitude of ways. And yes, Doctors with 50 years in the field of medicine have found that used certain ways, it can stop cancer.
This is real.
AzBirdDog 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog um.. uno problemo... youi get pot oil from marijuana and Hemp opil from the hemp plant... other then that, your right, its capable of healing just like pot.
Me102288 1 month ago
@AzBirdDog but are those "certain ways" available to every day average income pot smokers or do you have to have a big lab to extract the shit like think about it....bong/joint or take how ever long it takes to extract it all and do what needs to be done in this large process it all comes down to could we do it in our own home with no extra parts or expenses
TheHalfordFreak 2 weeks ago
@TheHalfordFreak you can make pot brownies or cookies.
nikolafilip15022000 2 weeks ago
@nikolafilip15022000 does that have any effect on lung or organ function ? ...or any negative side effects ?
TheHalfordFreak 2 weeks ago
@TheHalfordFreak nope, you don't inhale smoke so it doesn't damage your lungs. and there aren't any negative effects, in fact, the only negative thing is that you have to wait for a while for it to start working, but the high lasts longer.
nikolafilip15022000 2 weeks ago
@nikolafilip15022000 actually i read up on eating pot brownies and it is no healthier for you because the pot enters your blood stream instead of the lungs thus infecting all organs and not just one (lungs) but it is a way more intense high. and not that pot is very bad for you any ways i recently quit due to cardio issues (i smoked with alot of tobe) i think i might start back up again in the future but just never mix tobe or use
tobe-stop again
TheHalfordFreak 2 weeks ago
@TheHalfordFreak pot always enters the bloodstream, only when you smoke it enters the bloodstream instantly, just like oxygen.
nikolafilip15022000 2 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog
PERIOD.
psychosaneify 3 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog If you follow that link you'll find information relevant, yet contradictory, to your claim.
FfejTball 3 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog your facts are distorted and you have no valid sources other than google. i can google and find info on anything I want to be true without proof. I can even skip over valid info and believe propaganda. God doesn't make mistakes. Natural cannabis is not man made. But hey, keep popping your opiates and synthetically made drugs and believing that those things are perfectly good for you. When you get off the dope, compare the side effects of the 2. Someday MJ may just save your life too
illuminatikilla12211 2 weeks ago 2
@AzBirdDog coulnd have said it better,, they will kill you before letting this technology out..
best example is Stan Meyers... he got it working, died the next day from food poisoning. Perfectly healthy man died from food poisoning in less then a day..
sounds like we have to get 1 million ppl using it, they cant hide it at that point.
Me102288 1 month ago
@Me102288 What's to stop motorists using it right now ? Apart from the fact that it doesn't work of course, but apart from that why not try it ?
g7txu 1 month ago
@g7txu do yourself a little favour and lookup BMW Hydrogen 7 its a car that runs on hydrogen or gasoline at a flick of a button.. Jay Lano has one..
well there's your not working up in hydrogen so to speak..
the other part is basic electrolysis, lookup HHO Drycell and you will then know is more then possible to generate enough Hydrogen by splitting it from WATER
so you agree you absoloutly cant run you car on water, I agree totally
BUT.. you can on the hydrogen and oxygen in it
Me102288 3 weeks ago
@Me102288 So what makes you think I'm not aware of the Hydrogen 7 ? For all you know, I might have even designed it. We all know that you can reduce water into it's component elements of Hydrogen and Oxygen, but doing so requires an endothermic reaction. Unless you derive the input of this reaction from a renewable energy source, the concept is unworkable. These idiot pigs were probably fooled into fitting these by some religious nutjob like Dennis Lee.
g7txu 3 weeks ago
@g7txu reduce uh, do you even know how easy it is to spil hydrogen and oxygen out of water.. the energy source is electricity for the alternater of the engine..
these "idiot pigs" are using an accelerent.. Oxygen, with another highly explosive Hydrogen and adding some to gasoline, while taking SOME gasoline out.
this is called replacing one not so good combustable fuel with a much better one.
If you knew any better, this is exactly what NOS does as well,
Me102288 3 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog -.- You can't make hydrogen illegal... It is the most common element in the universe. Second only to dark matter.
Anyway HHO systems are crap. They only work properly on diesel engines. Currently there are only 2 diesel cars sold on the US market by BMW and Volkswagen.
Also hydrogen causes aluminum alloy and iron blocks to become extremely brittle. At some point the blocks can become warped or the connecting rod will crack/snap. It has no effect on gas engines besides the damage.
outpostprime 4 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog When was this law past? Watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid. Who needs a cell whan you got a rad full of water.
jocell202 3 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog It's large amounts of hydrogen you can't make. Do you think the mayor would be implementing this technology on his car if it was illegal?
crockett297 2 weeks ago
@AzBirdDog You're completely right!
DailyStaley 2 weeks ago
does this really work??!?! has someone experiences with that?!?! please post a serious documented video, based on facts which explains the whole physics!! if someone knows how to do this: please share your nowledge!!! peace
urgirl69style 1 month ago
I tried it. It doesn't work
accentironwork 1 month ago
I'd dare say this isn't true hydrolosis. even with a large tank of water and increadably powerful battery the amount of hydrogen produced isn't enough to power a car for a long period of time. however, I can't claim to be an expert on this, I've just done a few tests on this kinda stuff when I was in college.
Rora989 1 month ago
then we run out water then we die
thecreeperkilla 1 month ago
@thecreeperkilla Water will never run out.. Lordy mate! Google the Water Cycle
DoctorMonkey1234 1 month ago
Running om something experimental... Experiements fail, they say its running... LOL... NEWS is all manipulation..... it kinda works, yet they show ya it running?
Are we really getn to be that stupid now?
Man, Turn off TV and spend time in the lab, we need to be free for real...
RobMonty248 1 month ago
@RobMonty248 there are many people who do it now them selves - no complicated science involved - water - two metal conductors (metal sheets) soda for better conductivity - few ventiles in piping to prevent blowback - a storage tank if u need one - or if u can produce some 2 l of gas in a minute - i am pretty shure- a 2 or 3 liter can can run fully - have seen a lot of videos showing people testing - explaining and sharing details
jenssdewalka 1 month ago
Browns Gas!
arctictimberwolf 1 month ago
Interesting idea... I feel like there are some dangers though. First, hydrogen is more explosive than gasoline, which translates to more wear on the engine parts. Same reason you shouldn't fill up an average car with high octane fuel all the time. Secondly, if your hydrogen gas leaks, you have a situation that could result in an explosion or fire. Third, the electricity still has to come from somewhere. Granted, those actually aren't huge hurtles, but still.
MetalMavrik 1 month ago
@MetalMavrik hydrogen is 5-7 times more powerful then pump gas and way way more explosive thought this whole system has been know for years on end some people are still shocked by it because they have never gotten out of there house I guess! many people have tried this and some have resulted in explosions so this is still potentially unhealthy for you and you can get electricity free from solar panels and then store but that only works in small amounts if every one used this..ouch
minibikerider1 1 month ago
"When you are outta' water on the road, just pee into it..."
Telomeresis 1 month ago
Looks like a Joe cell....joseph christ, it works?
wotan237 1 month ago
16 - 24 MPG?? Holy moly.. how is it possible in this day and age to design and produce an engine that badly?
It would make more sense for these guys to stop wasting money on snake oil, and replace their current vehicle stock with stuff that wasn't hammered together in a shed.
Furrowbrow 2 months ago
@Furrowbrow Police seem to use powerful vehicles. If you take a car w/v8 and stop and go 200x/day i think 16mpg would b pretty good.lol. But seriously i think the mayor realizes by now he was scammed by hho like a lot of others. Dont quite understand why his "research"(lol) didnt simply include installing it on one vehicle and actually giving it a fair honest test.
tampicokeed 1 month ago
@901Jetta Are u aquainted with the phone? lol . Google this town (Honea Path SC), get mayors ph # (Lollis Meyers) and inquire about his hho project. Took me all of 10 minutes, guber. Grow up.
tampicokeed 2 months ago
this is laughable. please dont waste your time trying this
samskiter 2 months ago
I don't think electrolysis or hydrolysis is really a viable alternative... What I don't get is why biomass Fischer-Tropsch isn't more mainstream
toomainstream 2 months ago
Just talked to this mayor. They have discontinued using hho generators on their police cars. To hard to get the officers to keep up with day to day maintenance. Mayor says he still uses on personal vehicle--increases gas mileage from aprox 16 to 24.
I am very skeptical. Vid implied that reason 4 using this was the cities bad finacial situation. They found something that could cut their total city fuel bills by 33% but they are not using it????! :-) ;')
More of the same hho nonsense.
tampicokeed 2 months ago
Inteligent Policeman
emercito 2 months ago
Lol then the price of water will go up and Waterworld will be a documentary lol
OogleManiac 2 months ago
@ tampicokeed Your comment came through to my e-mail, but didn't show up on the video. NASA was trying to identify a phenomenon created through hydrocarbon+hydrogen combustion. Flame expansion of hydrogen and hydrocarbons occur at a similar rate. When the two are added the flame speed increases dramatically resulting in lower energy loss in the exhaust and lower manifold temperatures. The study was done for the Air Force I believe.
Ziji1 2 months ago
@Ziji1 Thanks 4 yur reply, i had read ur earlier coments nd they answerd my ?s. Nice 2 see coments that cum fr reality. U realze by now i am a skeptic about thes hho systms. Bring up a conspracy theory and uv lost me. lol. I wuld need a real, honest,test done with hho installd, and not installd, with severl disinterestd observrs etc etc. Thes sys hav ben since th 70s. I hav nevr seen or heard of test that showd + results. Hav u dun such a test? This vid fails on to many levls. :-) ;-) Chrismas!
tampicokeed 2 months ago
@Ziji1 A heads up about NASA study.It used640g/hr H in its experiment.
Typical HHO gen makes 2L/min=120L/hr.
HHO gas is .67% H. H is .09g/L. Thus amount of H made by ave HHO gen is: (120L/hr)(.67)(.09g/L)=7.2g/hr.
Thus on 7.4L eng with typical HHOgen u r supplyng only 7.2/640=1.15%as much H as the test used. But if u put same gen on 2.5L eng, that figure would be 3.45%
U would hav to install 30 typical HHO gens on 2.5L eng to =fuel to H ratio in NASA test.
Apples to apples????
tampicokeed 2 months ago
@tampicokeed sorry hho is 67% H not .67% but u get the point
tampicokeed 2 months ago
Never studied it but maybe there is something chemically going on inside the combustion chamber. Maybe the introduction of hydrogen and oxygen makes a more even burn you don't know. If they say it works it probally does
burnbabey12 2 months ago
Vehicles have an endless cycle of electricity. Plus these take about 3 amps so its no worse than turning your radio on. The alternator is going to produce the same amount of power as it would without it at any rpm range. Obviously going to make more electricity at higher engine rpm.
adamberg666 2 months ago
I had a car a few years ago with this Hydro Converter thingy. It was very efficient on fuel, and I only had to top up the water every couple of weeks (took less than 500ml).
ElfAzzid 2 months ago
Seems they would have to exhaust the oxygen and use only the hydrogen since the oxygen sensor would tell the cars computer to adjust the fuel mixture if the oxygen was used.
Dem0D1ck 2 months ago
BUT PREFORMANCE DONT THE DRAIN IN CAR CHASE . HOPE ALL COPS DO THIS
ajpunisher666 2 months ago
@tubiejonny
@MattBlytheTheOne G'day... Well, y're both almost half right, as it happens..! Point 1, Auto Alt's are only 2.5%-3.5% Fuel- Efficient (due to Belted Step-Up). So I retrofitted a streamlined Solar Panel & saved 35% of my Pre-Mod. fuelburn, with more Torque to the Gearbox, too. Search 'SunFoil Science'... Point 2, a bit of HHO makes combustion more efficient. So, a 2nd PV, 2nd Batt., a 6-Cell Hydrolyser run off Solar-Power only. Try that !
WarblesOnALot 2 months ago
The seperation of H2O via electronisys takes more energy to seperate than you get back from the combustion. What a waste.
tubiejonny 3 months ago 11
@tubiejonny you know you use the alternator for the separation of the H2O.
textiles1 3 months ago
@textiles1 ....So? It only works while you drive then? I would guess it is hooked upto your battery, not the alternator. If it is the alternator it is even dumber than I thought....so every hour of driving you get a liter of HHO? So what, that is about 100 feet of driving....
tubiejonny 3 months ago
@tubiejonny It is called "free" power if you use your alternator. Of course you will never run your car on 100% Hydrogen because it is not efficient. In that case you use gas to start up your car and the generator just helps the gas mileage.
textiles1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tubiejonny It is called "free" power if you use your alternator. Of course you will never run your car on 100% Hydrogen because it is not efficient. In that case you use gas to start up your car and the generator just helps the gas mileage.
textiles1 3 months ago
@tubiejonny Stan Meyer ran his water-car for 100 miles on pure HHO and it only used 4oz of water !!!!
MattBlytheTheOne 3 months ago
@MattBlytheTheOne You miss the point....if it takes the equivalant of 200 litres of gas to separate 4ozs of water into HHO, would you still like the idea of running a car on water. You aren't gaining any energy, you are just converting it and taking a loss at each conversion.
tubiejonny 2 months ago
@tubiejonny dude the engine produces enough power to generate electrolysis, and the result is increased fuel efficiency. Instead of gas you add water! How is that a waste?
MattBlytheTheOne 3 months ago
@MattBlytheTheOne ...So either the alternator was doing nothing, or you have taken energy away from what it was doing....which is it?
tubiejonny 3 months ago
@tubiejonny the alternator is producing the electricty ALL THE TIME the engine is running, what the car doesn't use gets wasted, at least when you are producing electrolysis you are converting the energy to good use. You are increasing fuel efficiency but you are not depleting the battery. The only cost is the price of water. But even then, when you add water you save that much on fuel bills.... That WHICH IS IT lol.
MattBlytheTheOne 3 months ago
@tubiejonny the alternator is charging the battery either way!
MattBlytheTheOne 3 months ago
@tubiejonny Not to mention the system can cause your engine to rust from the inside out...
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@tubiejonny This.
TheMadmanAndre 2 months ago
@tubiejonny your car is running anyway, so no waste!
MrDawggie 2 months ago
@MrDawggie Wrong....it puts drag on the serpintine belt, which loads down the engine causing it to burn more gas....its just converting gas power into HHO power with a loss at the conversion.
tubiejonny 2 months ago
@tubiejonny THis works therefore it is not a waste. If people can save money and less fuel that you are not saving now. Then it is better.
MrDawggie 2 months ago
@MrDawggie And the reason it isn't in every vehical is because people that can do the math know it doesn't work.
tubiejonny 2 months ago
@tubiejonny well then do the math you ignorant idiot lol
tonyjfalconeajutube 2 months ago
@tonyjfalconeajutube Its clear that you must be ignorant about this topic. Why don't you just take the gas out of the equation then and have an engine powered by HHO and all this excess energy you speak of can go towards making more HHO....I will tell you why so you don't go around thinking you have solved the worlds energy problems....its because that would be propetual motion and it is imposible.....2nd law of thermodynamics pal.
tubiejonny 2 months ago
@tubiejonny Ok. Go read the NASA publication on the issue. The data shows hydrogen enabling energy conservation in the combustion process. Nobody claimed hydrogen is adding energy in this system. NASA found that hybrid systems lost 43 hp to exhaust while gas systems lost 68 hp to exhaust. Not a bad turn around for a 3 hp loss to hydrogen conversion. 42% of an ICE's energy is lost to exhaust. Hydrogen helps recover up to 1/3 of that otherwise lost energy.
Ziji1 2 months ago