From nothing we have something. BS statement. There was life before the Cambrian. It was small and soft bodied. life got bigger and hard bodied in the Cambrian and that is why we can find it fossilised.
@simpsonmark That already refuted. We have found many sponge embryo fossil. If a sponge fossil can be found, we should found fossilized animal if they are exist before cambrian. but they don't. Cambrian is really an explosion. from all one cellular organism then suddenly to all phyla.
no biologist worth weight in salt would state "from nothing came everything."
from little came a lot is more in line with data.
it does make sense that cambrian fossils are harder to find ,based on their anatomy. a lil research won't kill you, don't let the sammuel jackson narrator do all the thinking for you. ;-)
Ah, ColdWaterMedia, the lying scum who brought us Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Ben Steins propaganda piece, voted the worst "documentary" of 2008, even by thinking theists.
.
It is gratifying to see that only a handful of people watch this crap whereas videos on evolution science, and science in general, get tens of thousands of views. Yay reason.
billions of people believe in nonsense stuff blindly in order to go to "heaven" or just to follow their parents and when in the end some of them realize how illogical what they are doing is,they are called rational
in fact people who realize the absurdity of the Bible and leave Christianity are indeed rational people and they reach a "crossroad" and some choose the path of another insane idea,and some choose the guidance from their Owner...
I can see this video is for the highly retarded creationists that constantly lie and refuse to see with any clarity. They twist the meanings of the bible to their liking.
Evolutionists don't need faith they have fucking science you dumb fucking idiots you cannot refute science you fucking sheep!
Oxygen caused the mass of life oxygen that wasn't there before that built up over billions of years from the algae that was floating on the oceans. Without the oxygen ther was no complex life, u cocks!
the story that a zombie retarded bacteria made you in billions of years after uncontrolled mutations and some more coincidences is the most unscientific claim the history of science has seen,it is a poor philosophy that the atheists have to believe,which is impossible times impossible according to maths and OBJECTIVE biology rules
@HighFlyingDutchman So 'retarded bacteria after billions of years of coincidences turning into humans' is your description of the Theory of Evolution...? If you don't have a clue, wouldn't it be better use of your time to study the subject instead of leaving vids and comments that showcase your ignorance?
@oneundergod Both macro and micro evolution are basically the same thing: change of allelic frequencies of time. The only difference is that with macro evolution the change effects the way a species reproduces. Both have been observed, Google would have taught you that. But as you say: you have the freedom to believe whatever you want or ignore any fact. Just don't think that your belief or ignorance changes reality: We're apes and share a common ancestor with chimps, we have the DNA to prove it
@oneundergod Ow, just in case you're actually interested: simply google 'observed speciation'. And no, it's not all some global scientific conspiracy...
Oh dear. Ediacaran fossils predate the Cambrian, showing that there were multi-celled life forms before 525 M years ago.
But, if you don't believe this, do you know what phyla are? If life appeared instantly on Earth, where are the fossil trees from 500 M years ago? The fossil mammals, reptiles, birds, amphibians and so on. This is a truly disingenuous video.
apparently, "over night" means 20 million years "geologically speaking"... they say -over night- just to make it seem that the time frame is too small for this to happen.. well, it's not!
Nevertheless, the difficulty of assigning any good reason for the absence of vast piles of strata rich in fossils beneath the Cambrian system is very great. ...The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained."
This Cambrian explosion information is pretty amazing. Very strong evidence for the sudden and rapid appearance of all or most living phyla in existence today.
It's totally unexpected and completely different from the fossil record that I would have thought Darwinian evolution would have made.
50 Million years is hardly 'suddenly', even on an evolutionary timescale. And what they forget to mention is that the Cambrian Explosion happened ALL under water. No land-dwellers where present during or at the end of it, they all evolved later on.
It was simply the result of 3 billion years of life evolving: after passing a certain threshold things excellerated.... and many species where short lived, replaced by better suited ones... just like evolution predicts...
Exactly. Also, when creationists point out the Cambrian explosion, I like to point out that we are in the same phylum as sea squirts. Phylum is the highest taxonomic rank of animals for a reason - the divergences that led to what are now called phyla happened early!
I'm still waiting for a creationist to find a turtle, or a mosquito, or some rice in the Cambrian...
This "explosion" may have been sudden "geologically speaking," but it still occurred over millions of years... but go ahead, keep proving your ignorance. It's fun for us to watch.
wow. where is the proof? do you have any proof that before the cambrian explosion evolution was at work and the sudden explosion of diverse life forms was based on evolutio of 100s of million of years? and your evidence is ?
Wandp- even creationist videos talk of an earlier explosion prior to the Cambrian .I dont trust any creationist videos tough because they are too sloppy on mainstream facts.
The Cambrian period began approximately 542 million years ago (over 3 billion years after life first began on Earth) and lasted for over 50 million years. This is a well established fact. What kind of proof are you looking for?
As a typicial creationist video this is full of errors and deliberate misinformation .normally I would say this is lying for Jesus , but the Holy Father Moon gets some credit !
3:20 'No fossil evidence that they descendate from a common ancestor.' No of course not. Some mastergenes in the predecessers of the cambrians coding for new traits weren't put on yet. Because at one point some of them were the other animals had to evolve to keep up. There you have your cambrian explosion.
3:10 Here the fat guy makes another mistake. Darwin said his evolution of life would be gradual yes, but, today scientists know that isn't allways the case.
Look e.g. at the explosion of mammal wildlife in the palaeoceen or indeed the cambrian explosion. Life just doesn't seem to be graduate.
I think the theory is called Punctuated Equilibrium, and yes, it does seem that evolution can and does happen faster than we thought it did, this has been observed and noted and it is repeatable.
It may be impossible to prove this is what happened during the cambrian period, but i would argue that the cambrian explosion was a large episode of punctuated equilibrium, though i honestly haven't read about the theory.
Actually PE doesn't describe rapid evolution. It describes different modes of speciation which can reflect in the fossil record as abrupt appearances.
And the Cambrian can best be described as an era where the phenomenon of fossilization became a much more probable event since this is when hard bodies and skeletons made their first appearances out of the simpler soft bodied types. These superior body plans became established and it's been an evolutionary arms race ever since.
PE can be observed today, its not just seen in the fossil record. Speciation is basically the point where one species splits and becomes 2 or more. The only mode of speciation is evolution, but punctuated equilibrium shows that it can occur quite alot quicker than we originally thought.
There is no generally accepted theory on what caused the cambrian explosion, you can speculate that the geology of the era might have been better suited to fossilize.
No, speciation has many modes. Peripatric, parapatric, allopatric, sympatric and heteropatric are the established modes we know of.
Again, PE explains abrupt APPEARANCES. Not rapid evolution. Furthermore, PE refers top geologic expanses of time. Read the common misconceptions part of PE wiki page. I think you are blurring ecological time with geologic time.
No, not the geology of the era, the BIOLOGY of the organisms. Why do you think we have so few fossils from the ediacaran? They were soft bodied. From the Cambrian and on, there is the emergence of hard shells and skeletons which is what increased the likelihood of fossilization.
You are muddling the lines between geologic and ecologic time spans. That's why you are having a hard time understanding my claims. Again, please review the misconceptions part of the PE wiki page.
Are you arguing with me? I thought you were backing me up, lol.
Ok i got a few terms muddled up, im never exactly sober on youtube to be honest with you :P
I was pointing to the fact that so many things could have played a factor in the cambrian explosion.
To further add to the conversation, if i remember correctly, i heard something about the genetic code replicating whole genes, when the pressure of natural selection is off the gene can mutate freely, im not sure how accurate that is.
Hah! I was beginning to wonder if you thought I was a fundy or something.
Yes indeed many things did play a role in the Cambrian. The main thing though is the emergence of hard parts and skeletons. This was a major step in the "evolution of evolvability".
Yep, your information is correct about gene duplication. That's one sure fire way for novel proteins to evolve. Several aspects of our circulatory system emerged as a result of that very process.
2:13 'From nothing we have almost everything.' That isn't true life had allready been evolving so much. The cambrian explosion is just the comming together of: more complex organs and vision which caused an evolutionary arms race we still see today.
in your proof present this 'first life' name it , name what it evolved into, explain how a flora became a fauna ,its all the insane ravings of satanists decieving you away from god, your god head replacement is a series of facts, they teach to children [saying its proof, when kids question it theyu say you will know all the facts later, well its later explain it ,give us one evolution into a new species, reveal one fly that did not breed a fly,reveal how one goat evolved into one sheep,fact time
Dude, there is reems of data explaining how bacteria evolved into moving things like trilobites etc, then there is massive reems of data for how these organism's evolved into fish and eventually amphibians etc, seriously, read a book or two!.
If you think there is a god, then prove it!!, if you can't, shut the fuck up!!.
Proof that God exists is all around them...they don't want proof...they want to be their own god...
It's funny to see when their tower of Darwin gets toppled the real evolutionists come out..
But...they can be their own god...Darwin or not...they just hide behind Darwin...they admit Darwin was wrong...Darwin admits Darwin was wrong if the fossil life does not prove his theory after his writings....
But they desperately hold on to it...otherwise they have to concede...
Would be nice if you could provide the information and evidence of evolution process at work before the cambrian explosion and show us that all the suddenly appearing complex and complete life forms were evolving for 100s of millions of years before cambrian explosion?
Wandp- You do know that precambrian fossils where mostly trace fossils of little footprints and crawl marks .Body fossils dont preserve of softbodied creatures easily .
Wandp7782 -I find most creationists cant even accept transitional fossils in general of easily understood animals .Consult mainstream science and read in depth .Creationist literature makes poor tutorials.
of course i can provide some, but the more pertinent question is... Have you even looked for them yourself?
I ask because the common denominator among all creationists isn't a Ph.D in microbiology, its a lack of understanding of any of the subjects evolution affects.
I'm basically asking if yours is a legitimate query, or a rhetorical question based on your own ignorance.
PS) If you're a YEC then you're not allowed to cite the cambrian explosion PERIOD.
educate yourself on what darwinism is really on about,racial purity,about you trusting in their putting mercury in the cure for the cold, so you accept the science of food adulteration, so you think the science is in[its not]it was faith in the science of flat earth that caused the church to reject even their own priest who proved we go arround the sun[just as even the pope is decieved about evolution[he is one of you], the athiests need a system that removes god, if you have proof present it
Scientists: geneticists, biologists, geologists, entymologists, botonists, paleontologists, zoologists, pathologists, nearly all find the evidence points toward an evolving philogentic tree. The evidence is so pognant and clear that traits vary and change from genmeration to generation at a relatively fixed rate that it is ludicrous there are still refuters. Scientific ludites who rather than add to the spirit of progress, seek to defeat truth with delusion. Dark ages will return if we let them.
mate you mention valid sciences[in their own fleilds] none of them apply the theory of evolution EXCEPT in the species [to mutate wheat into wheat] now they play god with putting fish genes into food, the evolving lies/so you trust science[but dont question your faith in them]your faulse gods are decieving you, they regard your inferiour 'genes' as troublesome, learn about darwinisms real goal, you wont hear no definitive proof of the full story, its taught to children, because adults need facts
Wheat is an evolution of grass. So is barley. There are numerous examples of speciation especially in botany. All those branches of science focus on evolution as the underlying mechanism for the philogenetic tree. They are able through genetics alone to trace a humans genetic roots. More and more is known about the rate of mutation and what it's naturalistic causes are.All the branches of study I mentioned have fully embraced it as the primary explanation.
If the knowledge is mis-interpreted and mis-used, (ie eugneics), then that is the fault of those that misuse it. I would rather know the truth, than believe in delusions or lies. Nuclear science can also be misused by the misguided with even more catastrophic results. Darwinism is simply a study of biology, not a directive for using the results of the research.
mate google 'eugneics darwinism' right from this page
darwinism is much more than you can concieve ,he was a great man, but what has been done with his reseach is being done by demons ,google up monsanto [my satan] or financing monsanto see the rath chuld conection, there is different levels ,having lies taught to children gives them faith in science, not god, guess that is conveniant for the stanists ruining gods creation, leading fools with theory masked as science, that is used to kill em
Darwin wrote a book on biological observation and geological observation, reproductive habits and trait inheritance. He didn't know about genetics, but he practically prdicted that genes exist. His books were not moral treatises, but he comments on the value of good morals in a successful society in his ascent of man
ok so we have a grass evolving into a grass ,grass is a seed bearing plant so is wheat[next no doudt some fool will state about dogs canus comming from wolves canus
mate like makes like as it [its called micro evolution within the genus [grass], but prove that grass evolved from not grass [thats the lie] ,prove grass evolved into 'trees'it is this science has not [cannot do]
the mutation rate stands at some thing like one mutation for every 200 cell divisions [your body has billions of em]
Yes, and primates remain primates, and we are primates. Apes remain apes and we are apes, mammals remain mammals and we are mammals. It is true that we will not evolve into a dog or cat, but evolution doesn't predict this either! Educate yourself.
Sorry but to say that "a growing n8umber of scientists are starting to disagree" is just an out and out lie!!.
Anyone can say something like that, for instance, "a growing amount 9of Muslims are starting to get pissed off with Islam and deciding to become Hindu's"
Complete fabrication, but if I say it often enough and get all those that agree with me to propagate the myth then it starts to sound like it is true!.
If biologists disagree with certain aspects of evolution, or our understanding of a certain portion of the model, that says NOTHING AT ALL about the theory in it's entirety, or about the fossil record being inadequate to explain the diversity of life!.
To say other wise is an utter lie, a malevolent subversion designed to add fuel to the fire that they started!.
joe bott ...GREAT MATE HOW ABOUT REPLICATING IT,...thing is science is so 'specialised' everyone presumes the next guy will link it all together... but the big picture is full of holes..gaps.. mainly and consistantly where one genus is speculated to have evolved into the other[but science consistantly uses the species evolution to say genus evolution, as if they are the same thing [they arnt, darwin wrote evo of SPECIES ,not evo of genus TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS
Unnecessary, Darwin talked about natural selection and environmental pressures, others have added over the years, it is still part of an ongoing process of evolution, there is nothing to replace, simply a theory that is constantly being added to and backed up by even more evidence!
the same re flat earth theory and the sun going arround the earth, that was another science theory.
you claim [via evolution] that life came from nothing ambiogensis ,that life arose spontainiously[other evoltion god heads claim alians[what made the alians lol, your grasping at staws , teaching a sci theory as sci fact [its sci fiction, if its science replicate it, if science close up the gaps between evolving genomes, where your mamal snake or your cold blooded mamal ,its simply not there
OK, flat earth was not a theory, it was a hypothesis, it was also based upon speculation.
Sun going round the earth was a theory, but it was based upon false information.
I don't claim that evolution and abiogenesis are anything like each other, one is the theory of how all life came about through naturalistic means (lots of evidence and we can even reproduce most of the states in depth) and evolution is the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor.
Abiogenesis does not state that life came from nothing at all, it claims that in the right environment, given the right chemistry, amino acids can form and then they can when mixed with a certain catalyst (that was abundant on the surface of the early earth) form into long chains. These chains can reproduce them selves (FACT) then these subtle changes can produce proteins and eventually DNA (fact)
The reason that it is a widely supported theory is because we have been able to recreate every stage in a lab, not with complete suckses, but with partial suckses, in some cases we have the whole picture for that part of the theory.
Evolution is backed up by EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE lol, seriously, if you don't belief in evolution, your a retard!., sorry, but your lying to your self!.
There is no such word as Darwinism, it is a creationist straw man made up merely so they have a term to argue against to imply that there is ANY dissemination between scientists!.
99.9 percent of scientists from all fields think that evolution is a fact, the ones that don't are twisted creationist nut jobs!.
Please consider that the Cambrian explosion has been well-documented for over 100 years and has been adequately explained for over 15. Check Wikipedia. Check talk.origins. Check the Encyclopedia Britannica (free online!), for heaven's sake. Hundreds of articles are out there focusing on every aspect of the period, if you look.
Yes, Darwin was puzzled by certain visible aspects of the Cambrian period, but he lived over 200 years ago and had weaker analytical tools to work with. Funny, that.
@HighFlyingDutchman Everyone in the Cambrian Period had a mom and dad, just like today. The phyla came into existence from evolution. The animals were all small marine creatures, no land animals, no dinosaurs, no birds.
if only i had faith like evolutionist have faith, based on so little info they are able to reject so much of what god reveals via his amasing creations.
they claim science will explain it all [someday], thus miss god in real time explaining so much about himself via his amasing living art [life]
they dont even know their own science, yet use their little knowing to ignore the reality god provides for us live time all the time
it is sad they see life as an accident thus miss gods grand plan
@oneundergod The fact that you don't know the evidence, doesn't mean there isn't, it only proves your ignorance on the subject. You simply WANT to see God's hand in everything so you shut your eyes for contradicting information. Evolution is a fact of nature, it's been observed numerous times. That doesn't mean God doesn't exist, it only means God isn't necessary in the process, it can all be explained by natural processes. It does however mean that God didn't create us in his own image.
mashAllah, another great point to counter the evolutionist claims. They truly do hide behind the guise of intellect and reason, but the mask has been removed and the evolutionists have nothing to stand by anymore, alhamdulillah, thanks to God. Thanks for sharing these great videos. Salaam-u-alikum
@hsindi OK, here's a counter: there were NO land dwellers in the Cambrian, ALL evolved later on. Second, regardless of what is claimed in the vid, almost all creatures that lived in the Cambrian have long been extinct. The claim that 'all life as we know it now came into being in a short period called the Cambrian Explosion' is simply nonsense. I understand that it's music to your indoctrinated ears but still, it's utter nonsense.
sponges are relatively uncommon in the fossil record owing to their delicacy.
simpsonmark 3 months ago
From nothing we have something. BS statement. There was life before the Cambrian. It was small and soft bodied. life got bigger and hard bodied in the Cambrian and that is why we can find it fossilised.
simpsonmark 5 months ago
@simpsonmark That already refuted. We have found many sponge embryo fossil. If a sponge fossil can be found, we should found fossilized animal if they are exist before cambrian. but they don't. Cambrian is really an explosion. from all one cellular organism then suddenly to all phyla.
probokator 3 months ago
Evolution is usually 'slow' but can be 'boosted' at times especially (but not only) after extinction events.
simpsonmark 5 months ago
You can't put newspaper articles in school science textbooks.
simpsonmark 5 months ago
This programme is a disgrace as are the ideas beind it. These people what you to live in a theocracy.
simpsonmark 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The cause of Cambrian Explosion is Cognition (Nervous Systems) plus Sexual Selection. See here for more details: nature-sucks.blogspot.com
seremosricos 9 months ago
no biologist worth weight in salt would state "from nothing came everything."
from little came a lot is more in line with data.
it does make sense that cambrian fossils are harder to find ,based on their anatomy. a lil research won't kill you, don't let the sammuel jackson narrator do all the thinking for you. ;-)
Niveous23 1 year ago
I think modern biologists should start demanding their money back from their SO CALLED prestigious universities FOR TEACHING THEM REDICULOUS LIES!!!
blkbookwizz 1 year ago
Ah, ColdWaterMedia, the lying scum who brought us Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Ben Steins propaganda piece, voted the worst "documentary" of 2008, even by thinking theists.
.
It is gratifying to see that only a handful of people watch this crap whereas videos on evolution science, and science in general, get tens of thousands of views. Yay reason.
Noisegator 1 year ago 3
@Noisegator
thats sad,isnt it?
billions of people believe in nonsense stuff blindly in order to go to "heaven" or just to follow their parents and when in the end some of them realize how illogical what they are doing is,they are called rational
in fact people who realize the absurdity of the Bible and leave Christianity are indeed rational people and they reach a "crossroad" and some choose the path of another insane idea,and some choose the guidance from their Owner...
respects anyway...
HighFlyingDutchman 1 year ago
I can see this video is for the highly retarded creationists that constantly lie and refuse to see with any clarity. They twist the meanings of the bible to their liking.
Evolutionists don't need faith they have fucking science you dumb fucking idiots you cannot refute science you fucking sheep!
Oxygen caused the mass of life oxygen that wasn't there before that built up over billions of years from the algae that was floating on the oceans. Without the oxygen ther was no complex life, u cocks!
skagman76 1 year ago 3
@skagman76
the story that a zombie retarded bacteria made you in billions of years after uncontrolled mutations and some more coincidences is the most unscientific claim the history of science has seen,it is a poor philosophy that the atheists have to believe,which is impossible times impossible according to maths and OBJECTIVE biology rules
i am not a christian btw
and you are free what to believe
peace
HighFlyingDutchman 1 year ago
@HighFlyingDutchman So 'retarded bacteria after billions of years of coincidences turning into humans' is your description of the Theory of Evolution...? If you don't have a clue, wouldn't it be better use of your time to study the subject instead of leaving vids and comments that showcase your ignorance?
MindB0ggling 1 year ago
@MindB0ggling/you don't seem to know the evidence,.is all micro-evolution
[at species-level..NOT macro-evolution..where a new genus/is theorised..to be CREATED
i 'see God's hand' in everything
because science decieves they are the same-thing i dont make the 'contradicting information'.
Evolution is a fact of nature,only at the species-level God create us..in his own image. so we could seek to know the difference
[or chose not to]..thus we each have freedom to believe..as we chose
oneundergod 1 year ago
@oneundergod Both macro and micro evolution are basically the same thing: change of allelic frequencies of time. The only difference is that with macro evolution the change effects the way a species reproduces. Both have been observed, Google would have taught you that. But as you say: you have the freedom to believe whatever you want or ignore any fact. Just don't think that your belief or ignorance changes reality: We're apes and share a common ancestor with chimps, we have the DNA to prove it
MindB0ggling 1 year ago
@oneundergod Ow, just in case you're actually interested: simply google 'observed speciation'. And no, it's not all some global scientific conspiracy...
MindB0ggling 1 year ago
Oh dear. Ediacaran fossils predate the Cambrian, showing that there were multi-celled life forms before 525 M years ago.
But, if you don't believe this, do you know what phyla are? If life appeared instantly on Earth, where are the fossil trees from 500 M years ago? The fossil mammals, reptiles, birds, amphibians and so on. This is a truly disingenuous video.
Gorteenminogue 1 year ago
A time frame of 80 or 100 million years is hardly sudden in our eyes, but sudden in geological terms.
Do we find horse or rabbit fossils in those layers?
StopSpamming1 1 year ago
Fossils show........evolution happened. End of story.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Let's use an event that happened 520 million years ago to prove a young earth !
'From nothing.....'' Wrong, everyone had a mom and dad.
Darwin was wrong about ''gradual', that does not mean evolution did not happen.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fossils are layered like this,
In the bottom layer of rock are shell fossils,
above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils,
above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils,
above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils,
above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian, reptile fossils
and dinosaur fossils
SEE a Pattern !?!
There are no human fossils found in any of these layers.
No dating methods used
gregrutz 1 year ago
apparently, "over night" means 20 million years "geologically speaking"... they say -over night- just to make it seem that the time frame is too small for this to happen.. well, it's not!
Goddaimn 1 year ago
@Goddaimn Considering the time it took for other organisms to evolve throughout Geological time scale 20 years is nothing!
CaliKush200 5 months ago
this documentary is so captivating
4ndiland 1 year ago
Most forms appeared, no most animals.
Nothing was in the Cambrian Period except small marine animals.
gregrutz 2 years ago
@gregrutz Most phyla appeared, Not most animals
gregrutz 1 year ago
Nevertheless, the difficulty of assigning any good reason for the absence of vast piles of strata rich in fossils beneath the Cambrian system is very great. ...The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained."
- Charles Darwi
Freenetnow 2 years ago
Absolutely amazing! Another nail in the coffin of atheism!
First the Big Bang which proved our Universe had a beginning, then the fine tuning of the Universe, and now this.
It truly does require more faith to be an atheist than it does to believe in the Almighty!
wgbutler777 2 years ago
This Cambrian explosion information is pretty amazing. Very strong evidence for the sudden and rapid appearance of all or most living phyla in existence today.
It's totally unexpected and completely different from the fossil record that I would have thought Darwinian evolution would have made.
wgbutler777 2 years ago
Creationist don't understand enough science to know that living fossils don't disprove evolution.
And everybody had a mommy and a daddy.
And chimps will never evolve into humans.
And monkey have evolved as long as we have.
gregrutz 2 years ago 2
50 Million years is hardly 'suddenly', even on an evolutionary timescale. And what they forget to mention is that the Cambrian Explosion happened ALL under water. No land-dwellers where present during or at the end of it, they all evolved later on.
It was simply the result of 3 billion years of life evolving: after passing a certain threshold things excellerated.... and many species where short lived, replaced by better suited ones... just like evolution predicts...
MindB0ggling 2 years ago 8
@MindB0ggling
Exactly. Also, when creationists point out the Cambrian explosion, I like to point out that we are in the same phylum as sea squirts. Phylum is the highest taxonomic rank of animals for a reason - the divergences that led to what are now called phyla happened early!
I'm still waiting for a creationist to find a turtle, or a mosquito, or some rice in the Cambrian...
Eyedunno 1 year ago
So can I have a pet Dinosaur?
poisonapple16 2 years ago
Groan, we (scientists and those with brains) do understand it, creationists REFUSE to.
TheFluffyDuck 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Evolution is bunk, figure it out folks!
goshawker07 2 years ago
This "explosion" may have been sudden "geologically speaking," but it still occurred over millions of years... but go ahead, keep proving your ignorance. It's fun for us to watch.
Leehofooks 2 years ago 2
wow. where is the proof? do you have any proof that before the cambrian explosion evolution was at work and the sudden explosion of diverse life forms was based on evolutio of 100s of million of years? and your evidence is ?
wandp7782 2 years ago
Wandp- even creationist videos talk of an earlier explosion prior to the Cambrian .I dont trust any creationist videos tough because they are too sloppy on mainstream facts.
flyingscience 2 years ago
The Cambrian period began approximately 542 million years ago (over 3 billion years after life first began on Earth) and lasted for over 50 million years. This is a well established fact. What kind of proof are you looking for?
Leehofooks 2 years ago
As a typicial creationist video this is full of errors and deliberate misinformation .normally I would say this is lying for Jesus , but the Holy Father Moon gets some credit !
flyingscience 2 years ago
are you saying that cambrian explosion did not happen? if not then what misinformation in the video you are specifically talking about?
wandp7782 2 years ago
Wandp7782- Creationists generally use the Cambrian explosion as some way to say See God made them instantly .
flyingscience 2 years ago
The bearded man is Johnathan Wells .He was a Mooney disciple ordered by Reverend Moon to get a science degree solely to attack evolution with a PHD.
flyingscience 2 years ago 2
do you have any more of this video
DamuEmran 2 years ago
Funny....when the scientists show evidence that the Darwinian tree is obviously false...then he's the "fat guy".
Typical...
Sunneyskys 2 years ago
3:20 'No fossil evidence that they descendate from a common ancestor.' No of course not. Some mastergenes in the predecessers of the cambrians coding for new traits weren't put on yet. Because at one point some of them were the other animals had to evolve to keep up. There you have your cambrian explosion.
Paralititan 3 years ago 3
3:10 Here the fat guy makes another mistake. Darwin said his evolution of life would be gradual yes, but, today scientists know that isn't allways the case.
Look e.g. at the explosion of mammal wildlife in the palaeoceen or indeed the cambrian explosion. Life just doesn't seem to be graduate.
Paralititan 3 years ago
I think the theory is called Punctuated Equilibrium, and yes, it does seem that evolution can and does happen faster than we thought it did, this has been observed and noted and it is repeatable.
It may be impossible to prove this is what happened during the cambrian period, but i would argue that the cambrian explosion was a large episode of punctuated equilibrium, though i honestly haven't read about the theory.
Eddiethepizzaboy 2 years ago
Actually PE doesn't describe rapid evolution. It describes different modes of speciation which can reflect in the fossil record as abrupt appearances.
And the Cambrian can best be described as an era where the phenomenon of fossilization became a much more probable event since this is when hard bodies and skeletons made their first appearances out of the simpler soft bodied types. These superior body plans became established and it's been an evolutionary arms race ever since.
twothlesswonder 2 years ago 5
PE can be observed today, its not just seen in the fossil record. Speciation is basically the point where one species splits and becomes 2 or more. The only mode of speciation is evolution, but punctuated equilibrium shows that it can occur quite alot quicker than we originally thought.
There is no generally accepted theory on what caused the cambrian explosion, you can speculate that the geology of the era might have been better suited to fossilize.
Eddiethepizzaboy 2 years ago
No, speciation has many modes. Peripatric, parapatric, allopatric, sympatric and heteropatric are the established modes we know of.
Again, PE explains abrupt APPEARANCES. Not rapid evolution. Furthermore, PE refers top geologic expanses of time. Read the common misconceptions part of PE wiki page. I think you are blurring ecological time with geologic time.
twothlesswonder 2 years ago
No, not the geology of the era, the BIOLOGY of the organisms. Why do you think we have so few fossils from the ediacaran? They were soft bodied. From the Cambrian and on, there is the emergence of hard shells and skeletons which is what increased the likelihood of fossilization.
twothlesswonder 2 years ago
However there are many changes that took place on the planet over a short period of time.
Higher oxygen levels, warmer climate.
The genetic code could have also passed a threshold, evolved itself in a way.
Eddiethepizzaboy 2 years ago
You are muddling the lines between geologic and ecologic time spans. That's why you are having a hard time understanding my claims. Again, please review the misconceptions part of the PE wiki page.
twothlesswonder 2 years ago
Are you arguing with me? I thought you were backing me up, lol.
Ok i got a few terms muddled up, im never exactly sober on youtube to be honest with you :P
I was pointing to the fact that so many things could have played a factor in the cambrian explosion.
To further add to the conversation, if i remember correctly, i heard something about the genetic code replicating whole genes, when the pressure of natural selection is off the gene can mutate freely, im not sure how accurate that is.
Eddiethepizzaboy 2 years ago
Hah! I was beginning to wonder if you thought I was a fundy or something.
Yes indeed many things did play a role in the Cambrian. The main thing though is the emergence of hard parts and skeletons. This was a major step in the "evolution of evolvability".
Yep, your information is correct about gene duplication. That's one sure fire way for novel proteins to evolve. Several aspects of our circulatory system emerged as a result of that very process.
I'm glad I was able to elucidate PE for you.
twothlesswonder 2 years ago
2:13 'From nothing we have almost everything.' That isn't true life had allready been evolving so much. The cambrian explosion is just the comming together of: more complex organs and vision which caused an evolutionary arms race we still see today.
Paralititan 3 years ago 2
Wow! This video is so wrong! I'm not sure where to start! Can I get permission to use it in a video response?
Darwinsgift 3 years ago 3
in your proof present this 'first life' name it , name what it evolved into, explain how a flora became a fauna ,its all the insane ravings of satanists decieving you away from god, your god head replacement is a series of facts, they teach to children [saying its proof, when kids question it theyu say you will know all the facts later, well its later explain it ,give us one evolution into a new species, reveal one fly that did not breed a fly,reveal how one goat evolved into one sheep,fact time
oneundergod 3 years ago
Dude, there is reems of data explaining how bacteria evolved into moving things like trilobites etc, then there is massive reems of data for how these organism's evolved into fish and eventually amphibians etc, seriously, read a book or two!.
If you think there is a god, then prove it!!, if you can't, shut the fuck up!!.
joebot1 3 years ago
why does everyone assume that if evolution is wrong attack the christians
DeJay14 2 years ago
Proof that God exists is all around them...they don't want proof...they want to be their own god...
It's funny to see when their tower of Darwin gets toppled the real evolutionists come out..
But...they can be their own god...Darwin or not...they just hide behind Darwin...they admit Darwin was wrong...Darwin admits Darwin was wrong if the fossil life does not prove his theory after his writings....
But they desperately hold on to it...otherwise they have to concede...
God Bless...
Sunneyskys 2 years ago
thanks god bless
DeJay14 2 years ago
Your comment is funny because it blatantly shows that you don't even know what the hell you're talking about.
I'm sorry, hypocrisy is makes me laugh...
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago
Would be nice if you could provide the information and evidence of evolution process at work before the cambrian explosion and show us that all the suddenly appearing complex and complete life forms were evolving for 100s of millions of years before cambrian explosion?
wandp7782 2 years ago
.Do you realise virtually all these animals fit in your palm and all are extinct now .Largest animal was 3feet .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Wandp- You do know that precambrian fossils where mostly trace fossils of little footprints and crawl marks .Body fossils dont preserve of softbodied creatures easily .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Wandp7782 - read up on precambrian life .Ediacaran and Vendian life .Stromatolites had the earth to themselfs for over a billion years .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Wandp7782 -I find most creationists cant even accept transitional fossils in general of easily understood animals .Consult mainstream science and read in depth .Creationist literature makes poor tutorials.
flyingscience 2 years ago
of course i can provide some, but the more pertinent question is... Have you even looked for them yourself?
I ask because the common denominator among all creationists isn't a Ph.D in microbiology, its a lack of understanding of any of the subjects evolution affects.
I'm basically asking if yours is a legitimate query, or a rhetorical question based on your own ignorance.
PS) If you're a YEC then you're not allowed to cite the cambrian explosion PERIOD.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago
educate yourself on what darwinism is really on about,racial purity,about you trusting in their putting mercury in the cure for the cold, so you accept the science of food adulteration, so you think the science is in[its not]it was faith in the science of flat earth that caused the church to reject even their own priest who proved we go arround the sun[just as even the pope is decieved about evolution[he is one of you], the athiests need a system that removes god, if you have proof present it
oneundergod 3 years ago
Atheists don't need to remove god, god does not exist!.
theists need to prove that god exists before they should expect anyone to take them seriously!.
joebot1 3 years ago
There is no cure for the cold.
It EVOLVES too fast.
And evolution doesn't disprove god. It disproves the book of genesis. That book wasn't written by god.
Atheists just take it a step further in denying your imaginery friend.
Eddiethepizzaboy 2 years ago 2
Scientists: geneticists, biologists, geologists, entymologists, botonists, paleontologists, zoologists, pathologists, nearly all find the evidence points toward an evolving philogentic tree. The evidence is so pognant and clear that traits vary and change from genmeration to generation at a relatively fixed rate that it is ludicrous there are still refuters. Scientific ludites who rather than add to the spirit of progress, seek to defeat truth with delusion. Dark ages will return if we let them.
CHAS1422 3 years ago
mate you mention valid sciences[in their own fleilds] none of them apply the theory of evolution EXCEPT in the species [to mutate wheat into wheat] now they play god with putting fish genes into food, the evolving lies/so you trust science[but dont question your faith in them]your faulse gods are decieving you, they regard your inferiour 'genes' as troublesome, learn about darwinisms real goal, you wont hear no definitive proof of the full story, its taught to children, because adults need facts
oneundergod 3 years ago
Wheat is an evolution of grass. So is barley. There are numerous examples of speciation especially in botany. All those branches of science focus on evolution as the underlying mechanism for the philogenetic tree. They are able through genetics alone to trace a humans genetic roots. More and more is known about the rate of mutation and what it's naturalistic causes are.All the branches of study I mentioned have fully embraced it as the primary explanation.
CHAS1422 3 years ago
If the knowledge is mis-interpreted and mis-used, (ie eugneics), then that is the fault of those that misuse it. I would rather know the truth, than believe in delusions or lies. Nuclear science can also be misused by the misguided with even more catastrophic results. Darwinism is simply a study of biology, not a directive for using the results of the research.
CHAS1422 3 years ago
mate google 'eugneics darwinism' right from this page
darwinism is much more than you can concieve ,he was a great man, but what has been done with his reseach is being done by demons ,google up monsanto [my satan] or financing monsanto see the rath chuld conection, there is different levels ,having lies taught to children gives them faith in science, not god, guess that is conveniant for the stanists ruining gods creation, leading fools with theory masked as science, that is used to kill em
oneundergod 3 years ago
Darwin wrote a book on biological observation and geological observation, reproductive habits and trait inheritance. He didn't know about genetics, but he practically prdicted that genes exist. His books were not moral treatises, but he comments on the value of good morals in a successful society in his ascent of man
CHAS1422 3 years ago 2
ok so we have a grass evolving into a grass ,grass is a seed bearing plant so is wheat[next no doudt some fool will state about dogs canus comming from wolves canus
mate like makes like as it [its called micro evolution within the genus [grass], but prove that grass evolved from not grass [thats the lie] ,prove grass evolved into 'trees'it is this science has not [cannot do]
the mutation rate stands at some thing like one mutation for every 200 cell divisions [your body has billions of em]
oneundergod 3 years ago
Yes, and primates remain primates, and we are primates. Apes remain apes and we are apes, mammals remain mammals and we are mammals. It is true that we will not evolve into a dog or cat, but evolution doesn't predict this either! Educate yourself.
CHAS1422 3 years ago
Sorry but to say that "a growing n8umber of scientists are starting to disagree" is just an out and out lie!!.
Anyone can say something like that, for instance, "a growing amount 9of Muslims are starting to get pissed off with Islam and deciding to become Hindu's"
Complete fabrication, but if I say it often enough and get all those that agree with me to propagate the myth then it starts to sound like it is true!.
joebot1 3 years ago 3
If biologists disagree with certain aspects of evolution, or our understanding of a certain portion of the model, that says NOTHING AT ALL about the theory in it's entirety, or about the fossil record being inadequate to explain the diversity of life!.
To say other wise is an utter lie, a malevolent subversion designed to add fuel to the fire that they started!.
joebot1 3 years ago 2
and for the record, we know EXACTLY how and why this happened!
joebot1 3 years ago
joe bott ...GREAT MATE HOW ABOUT REPLICATING IT,...thing is science is so 'specialised' everyone presumes the next guy will link it all together... but the big picture is full of holes..gaps.. mainly and consistantly where one genus is speculated to have evolved into the other[but science consistantly uses the species evolution to say genus evolution, as if they are the same thing [they arnt, darwin wrote evo of SPECIES ,not evo of genus TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS
cheers to you highflyer
oneundergod 3 years ago
Unnecessary, Darwin talked about natural selection and environmental pressures, others have added over the years, it is still part of an ongoing process of evolution, there is nothing to replace, simply a theory that is constantly being added to and backed up by even more evidence!
joebot1 3 years ago
the same re flat earth theory and the sun going arround the earth, that was another science theory.
you claim [via evolution] that life came from nothing ambiogensis ,that life arose spontainiously[other evoltion god heads claim alians[what made the alians lol, your grasping at staws , teaching a sci theory as sci fact [its sci fiction, if its science replicate it, if science close up the gaps between evolving genomes, where your mamal snake or your cold blooded mamal ,its simply not there
oneundergod 3 years ago
OK, flat earth was not a theory, it was a hypothesis, it was also based upon speculation.
Sun going round the earth was a theory, but it was based upon false information.
I don't claim that evolution and abiogenesis are anything like each other, one is the theory of how all life came about through naturalistic means (lots of evidence and we can even reproduce most of the states in depth) and evolution is the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor.
joebot1 3 years ago
Abiogenesis does not state that life came from nothing at all, it claims that in the right environment, given the right chemistry, amino acids can form and then they can when mixed with a certain catalyst (that was abundant on the surface of the early earth) form into long chains. These chains can reproduce them selves (FACT) then these subtle changes can produce proteins and eventually DNA (fact)
joebot1 3 years ago 2
The reason that it is a widely supported theory is because we have been able to recreate every stage in a lab, not with complete suckses, but with partial suckses, in some cases we have the whole picture for that part of the theory.
Evolution is backed up by EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE lol, seriously, if you don't belief in evolution, your a retard!., sorry, but your lying to your self!.
joebot1 3 years ago
There is no such word as Darwinism, it is a creationist straw man made up merely so they have a term to argue against to imply that there is ANY dissemination between scientists!.
99.9 percent of scientists from all fields think that evolution is a fact, the ones that don't are twisted creationist nut jobs!.
joebot1 3 years ago
Sorry your wrong its 99.999% not 99.9% ;)
TheFluffyDuck 2 years ago
Amino acids have been found in gas clouds in space. Its the law of nature that they spontaneously form. :-)
Eddiethepizzaboy 2 years ago
i am sorry dude that the sentence is there
if i made this video i wouldnt say such thing
not because that i am sure it would be a lie
but because i would not bu sure about it
and the numbers do not interest me
even if there was only one person believing in X i wouldnt reject it blindly just because no one else but one guy believes it
peace
HighFlyingDutchman 3 years ago
Please consider that the Cambrian explosion has been well-documented for over 100 years and has been adequately explained for over 15. Check Wikipedia. Check talk.origins. Check the Encyclopedia Britannica (free online!), for heaven's sake. Hundreds of articles are out there focusing on every aspect of the period, if you look.
Yes, Darwin was puzzled by certain visible aspects of the Cambrian period, but he lived over 200 years ago and had weaker analytical tools to work with. Funny, that.
deadacc64852 3 years ago
it is so simple dude
many phylums came into existence without real ancestors in a real short time
thats the story and misleading sentences can not darken its light against evolution theory
cheers
HighFlyingDutchman 3 years ago
@HighFlyingDutchman Everyone in the Cambrian Period had a mom and dad, just like today. The phyla came into existence from evolution. The animals were all small marine creatures, no land animals, no dinosaurs, no birds.
gregrutz 1 year ago
if only i had faith like evolutionist have faith, based on so little info they are able to reject so much of what god reveals via his amasing creations.
they claim science will explain it all [someday], thus miss god in real time explaining so much about himself via his amasing living art [life]
they dont even know their own science, yet use their little knowing to ignore the reality god provides for us live time all the time
it is sad they see life as an accident thus miss gods grand plan
oneundergod 3 years ago
Dankeschön für coming back ol' friend :D
HighFlyingDutchman 3 years ago
@oneundergod Scientists don't use faith, just facts.
Facts religious people don't even know exist, they don't study science.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@oneundergod The fact that you don't know the evidence, doesn't mean there isn't, it only proves your ignorance on the subject. You simply WANT to see God's hand in everything so you shut your eyes for contradicting information. Evolution is a fact of nature, it's been observed numerous times. That doesn't mean God doesn't exist, it only means God isn't necessary in the process, it can all be explained by natural processes. It does however mean that God didn't create us in his own image.
MindB0ggling 1 year ago
mashAllah, another great point to counter the evolutionist claims. They truly do hide behind the guise of intellect and reason, but the mask has been removed and the evolutionists have nothing to stand by anymore, alhamdulillah, thanks to God. Thanks for sharing these great videos. Salaam-u-alikum
hsindi 3 years ago
thx 4 wtchn thm :D
salaam
HighFlyingDutchman 3 years ago
@hsindi OK, here's a counter: there were NO land dwellers in the Cambrian, ALL evolved later on. Second, regardless of what is claimed in the vid, almost all creatures that lived in the Cambrian have long been extinct. The claim that 'all life as we know it now came into being in a short period called the Cambrian Explosion' is simply nonsense. I understand that it's music to your indoctrinated ears but still, it's utter nonsense.
MindB0ggling 1 year ago