@Lolipop665 There's a story with a similar plot. It's called "By the Waters of Babylon." The story is that modern civilization had been wiped out by nuclear weapons and man is once more living at a tribal stage. The villagers view us as gods, because of all of our advances they do nat have or even understand. It (the story) takes place in New York.
Nuclear power is generated by cooling a nuclear particle, which generates steam, which powers a turbine. It's one of the cleanest forms of energy possible. The only downside is waste, because idiots aren't going to be running a power plant, causing a meltdown.
These nuclear power plants cannot be made safe, are uninsurable and thier waste lasts 50,000 years.
The overwhelming majority of mishaps, leaked waste and sub-standard plant operations are covered up and silenced by the monolithic industry they are a part of.
Nuclear power is neither clean nor safe, it is the greatest act of environmntal vandalism ever undertaken.
@goggycozzle If you lived right next to a nuclear power plant you would receive less radiation from it than you would from other sources, the radiation is very well contained and safely released (large smokestacks = plenty of time for radiation to diffuse). And shouldn't we be trying to fund research for nuclear fusion? if we start using nuclear fusion in plants then the waste problem is taken care of (fusion = zero waste). Please inform me on the "overwhelming majority of mishaps" I'm curious.
@MrDroopdog1 Because killing myself alone won't prevent bombs from being dropped on your fucking slow ass, moron. Extinction =/= suicide. Humans are responsible for a whole lot of misery in the whole fucking planet, so I don't see it as being "bloody retarted" when thinking of a solution to the cancer. You're just afraid of dealing with it.
@rDroopdog1 Because killing myself alone won't prevent bombs from being dropped on your fucking slow ass, moron. Extinction =/= suicide. Humans are responsible for a whole lot of misery in the whole fucking planet, so I don't see it as being "bloody retarted" when thinking of a solution to the cancer. You're just afraid of dealing with it.
By 2050 fusion will be the source of most of the worlds energy.
This is not wishful thinking, it is simply a way of stating that all other forms of energy that are based on the use of finite fossil fuel sources must decline in the next few decades. This decline will provide a major impetus for the rapid increase in the utilization of Accelerator Driven Heavy Ion Fusion.
Visit Fusion Power Corporation and You Tube's - StarPower for Tomorrow! for a real education on fusion.
Today after Fukushima and the problem of what to do with nuclear waste can we not replace nuclear power by something better, safer and cheaper. See Star Scientic Limited by googling it. On their website they say that a power plant using their Nuon Catalysed Fusion would cost one quarter the amount of a nuclear power plant to build because there are no harful wastes to protect against. See also their Youtube video "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
1. Nuclear power is cheap, with all it requires is sea water and Uranium
2. It is also safe, only reason Chernobyl and Fukishima happened was due to Natural Disaster and Human Error (Also known as "Hey vladmir! lets heat water at unsafe temperature, chernobyl will become famous")
3. Solar / Wind is too expensive for the amount it produces.
4. Nuclear waste isnt a problem, Mix it up with boric acid and put it into a underground reservoir and bingo, no problems
@TheLowrid3r If you want to stand by Nuclear fission then be careful you don't get trampled in the popular stampede to Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion "..a form of energy which could cost as little as 0.9c per Killowatt" (chairman Andrew Horvath's tweet July 01 2011 - see also his blog "the Big Picture by Andrew Horvath"). This energy is so clean cheap and abundant people everywhere are going to want it. Did you go and look at it ? After you do, can you STILL want nuclear ?
I love the way the world is going insane, for example in my country almost NEVER is like really heavy storm, now were having extremely heavy storm like each 1-4 weeks. The funny thing is their saying blablabla this and that, no clouds that don't protect the sun from all these cancer things, bullshit, the magnetic field of earth is what protects us from space weather, like the sun the shine itself, but thanks to these "beatiful" creations, we barely have a magnetic field left
@phantomscolts2 i found once that about 350 nukes were detonated .... 250 ARE A FKING LOT NO WONDER cancer is rising .... people get infected easier and faster .
@barrow29 apparently there were about 2000 nukes detonated on this human infested planet , we are a plague , SOrry i dont re3ally understand what you meant ? you saying its our fault we dont wash our food ? cancer = mostly radiation you wont get cancer because you didnt carefully washed an apple
Thank you President Obama, 2011 has proven itself a very lucrative year with ongoing tax-funded Federal cash-injections and unprecedented fiscal spending on export energy initiatives.
Nuclear Power is as good for America as expanded contracts for offshore drilling with BP.
Nuclear Power and Offshore Drilling are some of the safest, most economical ways to boost Wall Street profits by attracting more investors from the central banking cartel and profiteering global High-Rollers like Goldman Sachs
@chrophe no it shouldent be hushed up what i meant to say was that hippies are trying to confuse people saying that things like the nukes on this vid are the results of stuff like a nuclear power plant blowing up, DID CHENOBRYL, 3 MILE ISLAND, OR FUKISHIMA LOOK LIKE THIS??!!! NO!!!!!
@GlobeWatch ur a fuckin hippy nothing else:L ur intending to confuse people and turn them into hippies by showing these vids, not one of these is an acident asscosiated with nuclear power.
@THEDARKSLASHER1 So the fact that we ´ve made thousands of nuclear bombs a thousand times stronger or more than Hiroshima should be hushed up?
Manufacturing these bombs is not an accident. These bombs have been made to put to use. Its a tragic testament to our idiocy. And on more than one occasion the american military wanted for it to be used on the enemy: the cuban missile crisis and the korean war. Both times more intelligent minds prevailed.
All out WW3 will be the end of the world. Man is not contented with guns.. we like to press buttons just for our own destruction. Every large country is afraid to be surpassed in the art of war.. thats why they secretly develop and enhance super weapons... Nuclear weapon? that's old.
@phantomscolts2 Although this comment is old, your comment about researching "the effects of under ground detonations on the magnetic field of the earth" are ridiculous. Do you understand what happens when an atomic weapon is used..?
@777iop It was everyone, from Soviet Union to the Middle East. I wouldn't be surprised if Africa or South Africa or China would have Nuclear Warheads somehwere in a bunker. The Americans discovered it, and the world used it.
@MARKLStudios No. We are the only nation that used it as an attack during a war. The nuke's use, or function, is to kill. That's why I am saying we are the only ones that used it...
@777iop Well I'm not American, but I'm sure other nations used it but in a smaller ammount. More like Nuclear testing or getting ready for a Nuclear war. Either way, getting ready is almost as bad as starting a war. Or at least in my opinion it is.
This is a very sad movie. We live in a harsh and poisoned environment today because of this. It's really said to think that these are man-made events. I am ashamed of our race. Extinction is deserved.
@deathm0100 But not to everyone, some of us live an honest life. It's our own fault for not forseeing the government's mistakes and not doing a shit about it. But that's what second chances are for, for us to clean up what they fucked up.
Man raining down hate and discontent towards fellow man. Nothing's changed in the history of our species. How efficient we have come to be at killing one another.
Everybody hates nuclear, until you got a mass extinction event...like an incoming asteroid. DDT was a bad thing; we made sure the African nations with malaria problems would not get it...50 million dead blacks, killed by environmental policies not racism. And when food supplies can't be irradiated... how many will die of botulism ? Sorry, but the future is going to have choices made.
Every society has to discover it ,like fire, but we have to know the consequences of this extreme power, witch can destry us all . Nuclear waste takes 100 000 years to become sterile. Just watch the movie INTO ETERNITY. You'll see how must its costing us , wich is hidden from the public.
@3nlighted There's nuclear energy all around us, and no, it most often takes millions of years for most of the waste to reach it's half-life. Not sterilize. HALF-LIFE.
@CorrineInChains Sorry. Its true but i ment not harmfull to the environment. Aniways they are other technology's , Nuclear was just a way of life 30 years ago. They tought it was the right path. Its not !
@hillberg100 Morons With morals And judgement Turn it into bombs and threaten to drop it on peoples heads, if you see it in person you'll die a slow and painful death, if you touch it your die in a matter of seconds, it is a tool, a tool of destruction and creation, it can preserve and destroy just like all things can, but its just not worth it.
Another feckless moron that doesn't understand the difference between nuclear power and nuclear weapons. Oh dear.
Time we all stopped using electricity and gave up is it?
Presumably renewable power is off because it's far more deadly than nuclear, having killed thousands more than civil Nuclear Power while generating less electricity. Go look that up for yourselves.
@Chandersson25 Because the maker of this vid wants to paint nuclear power as equal to nuclear weapons when most of the nuclear arsonal is being used right now to power our reactors in the US. That's not to say it's perfectly safe, but you shouldn't think mushroom cloud when you hear the the word, "Nuclear".
@CalicoVall you shouldnt? because the by product of nuclear energy has to blow sooner or later and there is no getting around that, all they do is postpone it (it cant go away). do your homework
@Iamboott Listen. Google 'Fast Breeder Reactors' and 'Pebble-Bed Reactors'. Used in conjunction, nuclear mealtdown is impossible and upwards of 98.7% of radioactive waste can go back to the reactor to be used again. ^_^
@phantomscolts2 excellent point, why doesn't someone in the government see this problem.. who really knows what we are ingesting and how much ? I guess they figure it will eventually wear off. Ignorance is not bliss.
@cruisingalong That's why there are radiation detectors all over the country both around and not around nuclear power plants. If lethal levels are detected, a general warning is sounded and an automatic broadcast is sent out to leave the area while emergency responders are sent out to start containing and cleaning up the radiation. Or, if it's weak, they can just put an advisory out to leave the area for a few weeks so that rain and other natural forces can clean it out.
@ELEMENTSFAN666 natual uranium may be more radioactive but the conectrations found naturally in the earth are so low that they dont split very much. as a result depleated uranium that is closer together is more of a biohazard then depleated uranium.
Maybe this is why the reptilians, or children of Satan, the master reptile, are trying to lower the worlds CO2 levels so they can keep functioning, while lowering plant photo synthesis that produces oxygen for humans, while collecting a tax to fund their agenda.
@british123able hands down, you are an idiot. if it was not for people equally as screwd up in the head as you we would not have or need nuclear bombs. thanks for that
@british123able Britain doesn't have the resources to do that. Even if it did, adding half a billion to the National Health Service would drain even if the rest of the world bailed Britain out.
We didn't create it, just figured it out. Our sun is nuclear. The entire core is consistent nuclear fusion. Any technological civilization whether it be human or alien would eventually stumble upon it.
@cb7pwn Its a normal evolution, every society discovers it . But we have to stay away from it ! Think of the holocaust it could do. Other society's did fall in mass extinction by it, some even went cannibal. So your game fallout is not that far fetch but more truth was into it then you think.
@cb7pwn Albert Einstein discovered it, but the Americans took it and perfected it. I've done my fair share of research and multiple biographies on Einstein, and when he discovered how powerful this bomb was the Americans didn't care. And it was too late, for everyone.
@MARKLStudios Wrong. Leo Szilard and Enrico Fermi (Along with other physicists like Otto Frisch) were mostly responsible for the discovery of the properties of Uranium.
@DeimosMk2 Ah but Einstein discovered how dangerous it could be but it was too late for the Americans because they didn't care how devastating the weapon would be.
@MARKLStudios Wrong. Einstein never had ANYTHING to do with the atomic bomb aside from his equation E = mc^2 which related the energy inherently stored in any amount of matter.
@barrow29 twice, i'd say. but i don't think testing nuclear bombs in deserts or islands (i'm sure you know how many detonation tests went on since '50s...) is much cleverer or "human-like" than bombing cities..so yes, man is shit for USING this, though man is the god of the world for DISCOVERING this.
and no, my friend, i'd like it!, SADLY this is not an apple pc but a shitty microsoft lol
@cb7pwn we are not shit for creating Nuclear power its has polar oppisite uses.... a power resorce and a destructive power cappable of destroying the world... it is a test will man use it for energy or war.... it was destined to be found all the minerals and all the checmicles everything in this world is destined to be found becasue we look for it. all of man are not bad so dont bestowe everyy one the totle of "shit" we are better then that.
my laptops,your laptops,many companies,buildings,parks,mountains,TVs,big and small cities,banks,books,ipods,clocks,calendars,audios,you t-shirt,your pants,your socks,baseball teams,basketball teams to be continued
look at my comment.nuclear weapon erase your leg,head,your hair,your open wide eyes,your parent,your kid,my body,your daddy`s head,your computer,his or her cars,random motorcycles,17 inch monitors,youtube,etc..
oh why messing with nuke bombs when you can deploy single bio bomb and kill anything living on world (and it's true) but men swore not to ever do that ..... just guess !!!! ..........
Don't you think the video's title is just a little misleading? Nuclear Power makes me think of cooling towers, containment domes, and steam turbines. Nuclear Power and Nuclear Firepower are two totally different things. The only way to get an explosion like this from a nuclear power plant would be to drop a nuke on it. If you're anti-nuclear weapons, fine. I can't say I'm exactly FOR them. However, if this is supposed to be anti-nuclear power, you need to get your shit straight.
when you guys see this, all you think about is a game? goddamn guys, you know how many people where killed by a nuke? AND YOU STILL WANNA CARE ABOUT YOUR FUCKING GAME? if anyone asks you to drop a bomb over your familys house, please tell me how it goes!
@skateboy159: No. Ignoring fallout for the moment, the Tsar Bomba (largest nuke ever tested, 50MT) had a 50% kill radius of perhaps 20 miles, mostly by blast effects. No one has proposed deploying such large weapons. Fallout can kill, I suppose, out to hundreds of miles, perhaps essentially worldwide, under the right conditions.
@moderndaydelilah93: First, the Army doesn't say, the gov does. The Army isn't really into nukes any more; it's the Navy and mainly Air Force. Why would anyone nuke a Taliban camp when a 500 pounder would do? I think the military would just as soon nukes didn't exist. The Taliban doesn't have one, if they did they don't have a delivery system, and if they did we'd probably already glow. No matter what they have they can't kill any significant portion of anything, just be terrorists.
@genevievechic20: No. You cannot get a nuclear explosion from a nuclear power plant. The explosion at Chernobyl was a steam explosion that released a huge amount of radioactivity. The worst sort of accident from nuclear power is a reactor meltdown (which also happened at Chernobyl, and partially at TMI).
Thats the future.The world is being set up to be destroyed, After President Bush i dont think America will be viewed the same.Some say that was lost after Vietnam and Nixon. Truly this Country had huge amount of prestiege and then came President Bush and it fell along with his popularity. CIA turture.Now every country is looking for nukes.soon they will use them. and other countrys will retaliate.Iran and Isreal, North Korea , Packastan.World is harmed and ready to obtain there special interest.
Albert Einstein once said ..." I'm not sure which weapons will be used in World War 3.....but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"...looks to me like he was on to something that is looking more likely than not.......
Nukes aren't as devastating as people are lead to believe. Sure it's ugly ordeal to drop one into a major city where everything is so packed tightly together, but it's mainly the fallout that really causes the massive death toll in the end.
This video, entitled "nuclear power" features only "nuclear bombs". It is possible to use nuclear power with 100% certainty that it cannot result in a nuclear disaster.
This has been flagged as spam show
"I am death,
The mighty destroyer of the world, out to destroy.
Even without your participation all the warriors
Standing arrayed in the opposing armies
Shall cease to exist."
-Krishna
Noise509 1 week ago
what song is it? what music is it used in the background?
TheOrphalinesX 2 weeks ago
Have the masters of war forgotten, that nobody would survive...
zauzari 2 weeks ago
i like it but so sad oh ps. nice scene
rickjames638 1 month ago
Man will probably keep make bigger and bigger bombs until they make one big enough that will blow up half the face of the earth
Lolipop665 3 months ago
@Lolipop665 There's a story with a similar plot. It's called "By the Waters of Babylon." The story is that modern civilization had been wiped out by nuclear weapons and man is once more living at a tribal stage. The villagers view us as gods, because of all of our advances they do nat have or even understand. It (the story) takes place in New York.
It's a very good story, I enjoyed reading it =)
tazira1 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
it's beautiful that man has created something that can literaly blow away all the cares in the world in just 30 miliseconds.so beautiful,yet so sad.
burn19ballz 3 months ago
It's beautiful in a way.
Agora2021 3 months ago
Nuclear power is generated by cooling a nuclear particle, which generates steam, which powers a turbine. It's one of the cleanest forms of energy possible. The only downside is waste, because idiots aren't going to be running a power plant, causing a meltdown.
peehere 3 months ago
@peehere
These nuclear power plants cannot be made safe, are uninsurable and thier waste lasts 50,000 years.
The overwhelming majority of mishaps, leaked waste and sub-standard plant operations are covered up and silenced by the monolithic industry they are a part of.
Nuclear power is neither clean nor safe, it is the greatest act of environmntal vandalism ever undertaken.
goggycozzle 1 month ago
@goggycozzle Nuclear power can be very clean and very safe as can be seen with CANDU reactors.
finaldestinyx 4 weeks ago
@finaldestinyx
Then why is every nuclear reactor on the earth uninsurable against radiation leaks, meltdowns and environmental catastrophy, earthquakes, etc?
goggycozzle 2 weeks ago
@goggycozzle have you seen a candu reactor go bad? -.-
finaldestinyx 2 weeks ago
@finaldestinyx
Dear God, how can you champion these poisonous degenerative technologies?
goggycozzle 2 weeks ago
@goggycozzle If you lived right next to a nuclear power plant you would receive less radiation from it than you would from other sources, the radiation is very well contained and safely released (large smokestacks = plenty of time for radiation to diffuse). And shouldn't we be trying to fund research for nuclear fusion? if we start using nuclear fusion in plants then the waste problem is taken care of (fusion = zero waste). Please inform me on the "overwhelming majority of mishaps" I'm curious.
Lacaras21 2 weeks ago
@Lacaras21
It simply doesn't bother you that the waste product of nuclear fission is radioactive poison that has a life estimated at 50,000 years?
goggycozzle 2 weeks ago
song?
ZipsamCreations 3 months ago
u all niggers you cant nothing about nuclear power so gtfo and shut up and get some brains before talking. go back to school kids
emhean 3 months ago
@emhean You should go back to school too to work on that grammar
VonSicem 3 months ago
@VonSicem And so should you. A sentence should always have a ".".
emhean 3 months ago
@emhean I love how your previous "sentence" never had one, just please stfu failtroll
VonSicem 3 months ago
@VonSicem Wow you're mentally retarded, right?
emhean 3 months ago
@emhean /watch?v=nc_LIR5ExIU NUFFSAID
VonSicem 3 months ago
'grown ups playing with firecrackers
HerrSchmutz 3 months ago
It has been about 2500 nukes detonated!
TecnoScope351 3 months ago
why
tidewaitor 3 months ago
@fantazmuhgorian
my nigga!
Powolny 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nuclear Nu-god of chaos, Clear, get it. Nu also equal 50. Nun=50 is the death card 13.
76hexum 4 months ago
More people are killed per year by wind power than nuclear
btw339 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrDroopdog1 Because killing myself alone won't prevent bombs from being dropped on your fucking slow ass, moron. Extinction =/= suicide. Humans are responsible for a whole lot of misery in the whole fucking planet, so I don't see it as being "bloody retarted" when thinking of a solution to the cancer. You're just afraid of dealing with it.
deathm0100 4 months ago
@rDroopdog1 Because killing myself alone won't prevent bombs from being dropped on your fucking slow ass, moron. Extinction =/= suicide. Humans are responsible for a whole lot of misery in the whole fucking planet, so I don't see it as being "bloody retarted" when thinking of a solution to the cancer. You're just afraid of dealing with it.
deathm0100 4 months ago
if you go to a nuke test site from 40 years ago with a compas it wont work... interesting
killemboyz 4 months ago
@phantomscolts2
By 2050 fusion will be the source of most of the worlds energy.
This is not wishful thinking, it is simply a way of stating that all other forms of energy that are based on the use of finite fossil fuel sources must decline in the next few decades. This decline will provide a major impetus for the rapid increase in the utilization of Accelerator Driven Heavy Ion Fusion.
Visit Fusion Power Corporation and You Tube's - StarPower for Tomorrow! for a real education on fusion.
hhelsley 5 months ago
Safe, Cheap are you joking. It costs millions to get rid of it. Some of the chemicals in uranium have a half life of 600000 years
evanmaclaren 5 months ago
@fantazmuhgorian I'm sure the Russians and Japanese agree with you completely.
Mozart1220 6 months ago
Today after Fukushima and the problem of what to do with nuclear waste can we not replace nuclear power by something better, safer and cheaper. See Star Scientic Limited by googling it. On their website they say that a power plant using their Nuon Catalysed Fusion would cost one quarter the amount of a nuclear power plant to build because there are no harful wastes to protect against. See also their Youtube video "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
2110kop 6 months ago
@2110kop
1. Nuclear power is cheap, with all it requires is sea water and Uranium
2. It is also safe, only reason Chernobyl and Fukishima happened was due to Natural Disaster and Human Error (Also known as "Hey vladmir! lets heat water at unsafe temperature, chernobyl will become famous")
3. Solar / Wind is too expensive for the amount it produces.
4. Nuclear waste isnt a problem, Mix it up with boric acid and put it into a underground reservoir and bingo, no problems
TheLowrid3r 6 months ago
@TheLowrid3r If you want to stand by Nuclear fission then be careful you don't get trampled in the popular stampede to Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion "..a form of energy which could cost as little as 0.9c per Killowatt" (chairman Andrew Horvath's tweet July 01 2011 - see also his blog "the Big Picture by Andrew Horvath"). This energy is so clean cheap and abundant people everywhere are going to want it. Did you go and look at it ? After you do, can you STILL want nuclear ?
2110kop 6 months ago
@TheLowrid3r yeah right, is that why it costs millions if not billions to decommision a nuclear aircraft carrier?
SirHungryHippo 5 months ago
E=mc2+ Szliard + Manhattan project = Creating of Nuke
=
obeymbs412 6 months ago
I love the way the world is going insane, for example in my country almost NEVER is like really heavy storm, now were having extremely heavy storm like each 1-4 weeks. The funny thing is their saying blablabla this and that, no clouds that don't protect the sun from all these cancer things, bullshit, the magnetic field of earth is what protects us from space weather, like the sun the shine itself, but thanks to these "beatiful" creations, we barely have a magnetic field left
RSKorosiya 6 months ago
KILL THE PEOPLE BEHIND THIS.EVERY ONE TO BE KIILED MY GOOD WASTE THEM LIKE THEY WASTED US
eddiegogan 6 months ago
these are bombs not plants
barrow29 6 months ago
@phantomscolts2 i found once that about 350 nukes were detonated .... 250 ARE A FKING LOT NO WONDER cancer is rising .... people get infected easier and faster .
Cobac 7 months ago
@Cobac i thought it was gov regulations to clean you food with bleach and even animals that died of desise when into your mouth
barrow29 6 months ago
@barrow29 apparently there were about 2000 nukes detonated on this human infested planet , we are a plague , SOrry i dont re3ally understand what you meant ? you saying its our fault we dont wash our food ? cancer = mostly radiation you wont get cancer because you didnt carefully washed an apple
Cobac 6 months ago
COMBIEN EN TOUT ET POUR TOUT GROSSOMERDO ,?
MegaStingers 7 months ago
Thank you President Obama, 2011 has proven itself a very lucrative year with ongoing tax-funded Federal cash-injections and unprecedented fiscal spending on export energy initiatives.
Nuclear Power is as good for America as expanded contracts for offshore drilling with BP.
Nuclear Power and Offshore Drilling are some of the safest, most economical ways to boost Wall Street profits by attracting more investors from the central banking cartel and profiteering global High-Rollers like Goldman Sachs
CorporateRule 7 months ago
@chrophe no it shouldent be hushed up what i meant to say was that hippies are trying to confuse people saying that things like the nukes on this vid are the results of stuff like a nuclear power plant blowing up, DID CHENOBRYL, 3 MILE ISLAND, OR FUKISHIMA LOOK LIKE THIS??!!! NO!!!!!
THEDARKSLASHER1 8 months ago
@GlobeWatch ur a fuckin hippy nothing else:L ur intending to confuse people and turn them into hippies by showing these vids, not one of these is an acident asscosiated with nuclear power.
THEDARKSLASHER1 8 months ago
@THEDARKSLASHER1 So the fact that we ´ve made thousands of nuclear bombs a thousand times stronger or more than Hiroshima should be hushed up?
Manufacturing these bombs is not an accident. These bombs have been made to put to use. Its a tragic testament to our idiocy. And on more than one occasion the american military wanted for it to be used on the enemy: the cuban missile crisis and the korean war. Both times more intelligent minds prevailed.
chrophe 8 months ago
"One good summer afternoon, you are sitting on a white beach when suddenly.. 1:35" hahaha
picassoreaper 8 months ago
All out WW3 will be the end of the world. Man is not contented with guns.. we like to press buttons just for our own destruction. Every large country is afraid to be surpassed in the art of war.. thats why they secretly develop and enhance super weapons... Nuclear weapon? that's old.
picassoreaper 8 months ago
humans decided to bring a part of the sun to thier backyard
rawdenashitey 8 months ago
☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢
CIA WARNING: NUCLEAR THREAT AHEAD.
DO NOT ENTER UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
KamKrzem 8 months ago
Comment removed
KamKrzem 8 months ago
can you give me this song?
cosmogold1 9 months ago
@cosmogold1 Arvo Parts "Fur Alina"... something along those lines.
wolfman5494 8 months ago
beautifully cut and accompanied, scary and sad possibilites
genedevine 9 months ago
@phantomscolts2 Although this comment is old, your comment about researching "the effects of under ground detonations on the magnetic field of the earth" are ridiculous. Do you understand what happens when an atomic weapon is used..?
DeimosMk2 9 months ago
@phantomscolts2 Because every nation has been involved in Nuclear bombs one way or another.
MARKLStudios 9 months ago
America is shit for using this
777iop 9 months ago
@777iop it wasn't just America Mr. 777
chevykid241 9 months ago
@chevykid241 I didn't say America is the only nation that has nuclear weapons. I said America is the only one that USED nuclear weapons Mr. 24
777iop 9 months ago
@777iop It was everyone, from Soviet Union to the Middle East. I wouldn't be surprised if Africa or South Africa or China would have Nuclear Warheads somehwere in a bunker. The Americans discovered it, and the world used it.
MARKLStudios 9 months ago
@MARKLStudios No. We are the only nation that used it as an attack during a war. The nuke's use, or function, is to kill. That's why I am saying we are the only ones that used it...
777iop 9 months ago
@777iop Well I'm not American, but I'm sure other nations used it but in a smaller ammount. More like Nuclear testing or getting ready for a Nuclear war. Either way, getting ready is almost as bad as starting a war. Or at least in my opinion it is.
MARKLStudios 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also...
>>but yes, nuclear reactions can kill people. but so can a spoon, it just depends on WHO has it and how they're using it.
So are you willing to leave your life at hands of others? Those in Prypiat (Ukraine) on april 26, 1986 were not so lucky.
deathm0100 9 months ago
This is a very sad movie. We live in a harsh and poisoned environment today because of this. It's really said to think that these are man-made events. I am ashamed of our race. Extinction is deserved.
deathm0100 9 months ago
@deathm0100 But not to everyone, some of us live an honest life. It's our own fault for not forseeing the government's mistakes and not doing a shit about it. But that's what second chances are for, for us to clean up what they fucked up.
MARKLStudios 9 months ago
@deathm0100 than how about you go kill yourself? everyone who claims humans deserve extinction are bloody retarded.
MrDroopdog1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And the USA is still the only country in the entire known UNIVERSE to use nuclear weapons against civilian populations.
WorldAgainstUSA 9 months ago
THE POWER TO CREATE THIS, WILL STOP US
racenemo 9 months ago
Man raining down hate and discontent towards fellow man. Nothing's changed in the history of our species. How efficient we have come to be at killing one another.
RockSteadyA8 9 months ago
Everybody hates nuclear, until you got a mass extinction event...like an incoming asteroid. DDT was a bad thing; we made sure the African nations with malaria problems would not get it...50 million dead blacks, killed by environmental policies not racism. And when food supplies can't be irradiated... how many will die of botulism ? Sorry, but the future is going to have choices made.
granddad2002 9 months ago
Fallout..
Narciso0192 9 months ago
Every society has to discover it ,like fire, but we have to know the consequences of this extreme power, witch can destry us all . Nuclear waste takes 100 000 years to become sterile. Just watch the movie INTO ETERNITY. You'll see how must its costing us , wich is hidden from the public.
3nlighted 9 months ago
@3nlighted There's nuclear energy all around us, and no, it most often takes millions of years for most of the waste to reach it's half-life. Not sterilize. HALF-LIFE.
CorrineInChains 9 months ago
@CorrineInChains Sorry. Its true but i ment not harmfull to the environment. Aniways they are other technology's , Nuclear was just a way of life 30 years ago. They tought it was the right path. Its not !
3nlighted 9 months ago
Its a tool, It has no morals, It does not judge. Idiots and morons fear it.
hillberg100 10 months ago 14
@hillberg100 Morons With morals And judgement Turn it into bombs and threaten to drop it on peoples heads, if you see it in person you'll die a slow and painful death, if you touch it your die in a matter of seconds, it is a tool, a tool of destruction and creation, it can preserve and destroy just like all things can, but its just not worth it.
Zorengeto 3 months ago
@hillberg100 I don't fear it. I only fear it in the hands of others.
flamedbaby 3 months ago
You are moron, it is nuclear power only use for difrent devices and in another moron hands it is weapons what can kill you moron
Arsene59Lupin 10 months ago
Another feckless moron that doesn't understand the difference between nuclear power and nuclear weapons. Oh dear.
Time we all stopped using electricity and gave up is it?
Presumably renewable power is off because it's far more deadly than nuclear, having killed thousands more than civil Nuclear Power while generating less electricity. Go look that up for yourselves.
Let's not the facts ruin things though eh?
Azazaazazazza 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Azazaazazazza You are moron, it is nuclear power only use for difrent devices and in another moron hands it is weapons what can kill you moron
Arsene59Lupin 10 months ago
Quite the un-biased vid here. -_- /sarcasm
CalicoVall 10 months ago
Why is it sad music?
Chandersson25 10 months ago
@Chandersson25 Because the maker of this vid wants to paint nuclear power as equal to nuclear weapons when most of the nuclear arsonal is being used right now to power our reactors in the US. That's not to say it's perfectly safe, but you shouldn't think mushroom cloud when you hear the the word, "Nuclear".
CalicoVall 10 months ago
@CalicoVall you shouldnt? because the by product of nuclear energy has to blow sooner or later and there is no getting around that, all they do is postpone it (it cant go away). do your homework
Iamboott 9 months ago
@Iamboott Listen. Google 'Fast Breeder Reactors' and 'Pebble-Bed Reactors'. Used in conjunction, nuclear mealtdown is impossible and upwards of 98.7% of radioactive waste can go back to the reactor to be used again. ^_^
CalicoVall 9 months ago
@phantomscolts2 excellent point, why doesn't someone in the government see this problem.. who really knows what we are ingesting and how much ? I guess they figure it will eventually wear off. Ignorance is not bliss.
cruisingalong 10 months ago
@cruisingalong That's why there are radiation detectors all over the country both around and not around nuclear power plants. If lethal levels are detected, a general warning is sounded and an automatic broadcast is sent out to leave the area while emergency responders are sent out to start containing and cleaning up the radiation. Or, if it's weak, they can just put an advisory out to leave the area for a few weeks so that rain and other natural forces can clean it out.
CalicoVall 10 months ago
At 1:58 a nuclear weapon is fired by artillery - that is just bad ass!
ThorkilKowalski 10 months ago
@phantomscolts2 natural uranium has more radioactivity then depleted uranium, did you smoke a giant rock before writing that comment?
ELEMENTSFAN666 10 months ago
@ELEMENTSFAN666 natual uranium may be more radioactive but the conectrations found naturally in the earth are so low that they dont split very much. as a result depleated uranium that is closer together is more of a biohazard then depleated uranium.
sangodemonslayer250 10 months ago
the end of the civilization.
roygbiv330 10 months ago
Do a little research on LFTR's you might well uncover some surprising facts.
awakeamericanow 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Maybe this is why the reptilians, or children of Satan, the master reptile, are trying to lower the worlds CO2 levels so they can keep functioning, while lowering plant photo synthesis that produces oxygen for humans, while collecting a tax to fund their agenda.
ncbookz 10 months ago
Hey military retards, destroying something is so much more easier than constructing something.
bibihang 10 months ago
senores piensen en sus hijos!!
Jhonny660 10 months ago
Beautiful music. Who's playing?
fotolx 10 months ago
its so sad...!
by the way what is the background music?
thanx in advance
boliper 10 months ago
น่ากลัวนี่แค่สมัยก่อนนะ
TAKRAEKKBI 10 months ago
Nuclear bombs was invented by an unknown Scientist.
missionagainstterro1 10 months ago
man is shit for creating this
cb7pwn 10 months ago 18
@cb7pwn
Hey, it was an accident.
TrolloftheTube 10 months ago
@TrolloftheTube how so? lol
cb7pwn 10 months ago
@cb7pwn i agree, if it was not for nuclear bombs britain would take over all the world, and we could be insanely rich once again,
british123able 9 months ago
@british123able hands down, you are an idiot. if it was not for people equally as screwd up in the head as you we would not have or need nuclear bombs. thanks for that
Iamboott 9 months ago
@Iamboott The problem is that there will always be people who will be so screwed up in the head.
CalicoVall 9 months ago
@british123able Britain doesn't have the resources to do that. Even if it did, adding half a billion to the National Health Service would drain even if the rest of the world bailed Britain out.
CalicoVall 9 months ago
@cb7pwn
We didn't create it, just figured it out. Our sun is nuclear. The entire core is consistent nuclear fusion. Any technological civilization whether it be human or alien would eventually stumble upon it.
Man is shit for weaponizing it.
riceburn405 9 months ago
@cb7pwn The guy who envented it Albert somthing, also against it. So dont hate the man hate the people that want to take advanatage of it.
igrowweedfromaseed 9 months ago
@igrowweedfromaseed HAHA Albert something...?!?! Einstein...and he was a "man"....
cb7pwn 9 months ago
@cb7pwn Its a normal evolution, every society discovers it . But we have to stay away from it ! Think of the holocaust it could do. Other society's did fall in mass extinction by it, some even went cannibal. So your game fallout is not that far fetch but more truth was into it then you think.
3nlighted 9 months ago
@cb7pwn Albert Einstein discovered it, but the Americans took it and perfected it. I've done my fair share of research and multiple biographies on Einstein, and when he discovered how powerful this bomb was the Americans didn't care. And it was too late, for everyone.
MARKLStudios 9 months ago
@MARKLStudios Wrong. Leo Szilard and Enrico Fermi (Along with other physicists like Otto Frisch) were mostly responsible for the discovery of the properties of Uranium.
DeimosMk2 9 months ago
@DeimosMk2 Ah but Einstein discovered how dangerous it could be but it was too late for the Americans because they didn't care how devastating the weapon would be.
MARKLStudios 9 months ago
@MARKLStudios Wrong. Einstein never had ANYTHING to do with the atomic bomb aside from his equation E = mc^2 which related the energy inherently stored in any amount of matter.
DeimosMk2 9 months ago
@cb7pwn Einstein is rolling in his grave ... :/
MrKiR0 8 months ago
@cb7pwn man is the apex of nature, the god of known world for creating this. MAN IS SHIT FOR USING THIS!
Cloutzs 7 months ago
@Cloutzs this has only been used once and if it wasnt your apple computer would not exist
barrow29 6 months ago
@barrow29 twice, i'd say. but i don't think testing nuclear bombs in deserts or islands (i'm sure you know how many detonation tests went on since '50s...) is much cleverer or "human-like" than bombing cities..so yes, man is shit for USING this, though man is the god of the world for DISCOVERING this.
and no, my friend, i'd like it!, SADLY this is not an apple pc but a shitty microsoft lol
Cloutzs 6 months ago
@Cloutzs i dont like apple and it is now illigle to test nucler bombs
barrow29 6 months ago
@barrow29 completely indifferent, by now
Cloutzs 6 months ago
@Cloutzs im used to rasest replyes
barrow29 6 months ago
@barrow29
How Stupid
obeymbs412 6 months ago
@obeymbs412 and you would have no electricty and the ozone would be gone
barrow29 6 months ago
@cb7pwn we are not shit for creating Nuclear power its has polar oppisite uses.... a power resorce and a destructive power cappable of destroying the world... it is a test will man use it for energy or war.... it was destined to be found all the minerals and all the checmicles everything in this world is destined to be found becasue we look for it. all of man are not bad so dont bestowe everyy one the totle of "shit" we are better then that.
cannonj16 6 months ago
Cast your vote!
Go to Twitter!!!!!!! @surveyindepth
surveyindepth 10 months ago
3:18 - 4:13 Not Nuclear bomb, but instead, a large amount of TNT.
BaltoVid123 10 months ago
nuke incoming.
xDjAsOnF 10 months ago
what if ONE of this fall onto us, the country...............
more sadness, chaos, war, difficulties, and CORPSE
Jenovaful 11 months ago
@Jenovaful Yea sad, just like in fallout
thevaultboy106 10 months ago
I saw that first explosion on spondgebob when whats his face eats that pie.
drKlitzman 11 months ago
organs,heart,shoes,accessories, jewelry,oils,backpacks,all foods for example bread,potato,cheese,milk.fingers,all museums,all zoos,
I can never speak a joke with the weapon
beyondsupreme 11 months ago
windows,mouses,animals,plants,your pets,every races,ciggeretes,wines,bananas,smart phones,china towns,all products,
10000000 times more than these things when a nuclear war happens.
beyondsupreme 11 months ago
my laptops,your laptops,many companies,buildings,parks,mountains,TVs,big and small cities,banks,books,ipods,clocks,calendars,audios,you t-shirt,your pants,your socks,baseball teams,basketball teams to be continued
beyondsupreme 11 months ago
look at my comment.nuclear weapon erase your leg,head,your hair,your open wide eyes,your parent,your kid,my body,your daddy`s head,your computer,his or her cars,random motorcycles,17 inch monitors,youtube,etc..
beyondsupreme 11 months ago
123 DO NOT LIKE BOMB
baozeng 11 months ago
oh why messing with nuke bombs when you can deploy single bio bomb and kill anything living on world (and it's true) but men swore not to ever do that ..... just guess !!!! ..........
JohnMinigun 11 months ago
Don't you think the video's title is just a little misleading? Nuclear Power makes me think of cooling towers, containment domes, and steam turbines. Nuclear Power and Nuclear Firepower are two totally different things. The only way to get an explosion like this from a nuclear power plant would be to drop a nuke on it. If you're anti-nuclear weapons, fine. I can't say I'm exactly FOR them. However, if this is supposed to be anti-nuclear power, you need to get your shit straight.
CeeJayDubbya1 11 months ago
chuck noris farted...
edmund104 11 months ago
when you guys see this, all you think about is a game? goddamn guys, you know how many people where killed by a nuke? AND YOU STILL WANNA CARE ABOUT YOUR FUCKING GAME? if anyone asks you to drop a bomb over your familys house, please tell me how it goes!
TheWowedo 1 year ago
@TheWowedo Yeah, I think i'm gonna go play Fallout, or maybe S.T.A.L.K.E.R., I'll tell you how it goes.
torchic122 11 months ago
Comment removed
teas781 1 year ago
dont nuclear bombs kill out to 80-100 miles?
skateboy159 1 year ago
@skateboy159: No. Ignoring fallout for the moment, the Tsar Bomba (largest nuke ever tested, 50MT) had a 50% kill radius of perhaps 20 miles, mostly by blast effects. No one has proposed deploying such large weapons. Fallout can kill, I suppose, out to hundreds of miles, perhaps essentially worldwide, under the right conditions.
puncheex 1 year ago
@skateboy159 no not unless the yield is extremely high, nd by high yeild im talking tsar bomba or more
ELEMENTSFAN666 10 months ago
the music is... beautiful
pranksters2009 1 year ago
@moderndaydelilah93: First, the Army doesn't say, the gov does. The Army isn't really into nukes any more; it's the Navy and mainly Air Force. Why would anyone nuke a Taliban camp when a 500 pounder would do? I think the military would just as soon nukes didn't exist. The Taliban doesn't have one, if they did they don't have a delivery system, and if they did we'd probably already glow. No matter what they have they can't kill any significant portion of anything, just be terrorists.
puncheex 1 year ago
Nuclear should be used for electricity!!!
but the bad part is that it can explode sometimes, creating a nuclear electricity bomb!
genevievechic20 1 year ago
@genevievechic20: No. You cannot get a nuclear explosion from a nuclear power plant. The explosion at Chernobyl was a steam explosion that released a huge amount of radioactivity. The worst sort of accident from nuclear power is a reactor meltdown (which also happened at Chernobyl, and partially at TMI).
puncheex 1 year ago
sorry to say but this music DOES NOT fit for nukes
jonasdrejerjensen 1 year ago
@moderndaydelilah93 Write much? What an incoherent bunch of jibberish.
CrudeDude 1 year ago
Americans are bastards for having used the nuclear bomb
S3V3X 1 year ago
@S3V3X me thinks someone needs to grow a brain and learn WHY the nukes were used dipshit
dice2025 1 year ago
I'm gonna go play Fallout.
loosafu 1 year ago 38
im in awe at the creation of something so destructive.... simply in awe
donchevito117 1 year ago
Thats the future.The world is being set up to be destroyed, After President Bush i dont think America will be viewed the same.Some say that was lost after Vietnam and Nixon. Truly this Country had huge amount of prestiege and then came President Bush and it fell along with his popularity. CIA turture.Now every country is looking for nukes.soon they will use them. and other countrys will retaliate.Iran and Isreal, North Korea , Packastan.World is harmed and ready to obtain there special interest.
spacecop67 1 year ago
Albert Einstein once said ..." I'm not sure which weapons will be used in World War 3.....but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"...looks to me like he was on to something that is looking more likely than not.......
abooboo4u 1 year ago
what's the song?
OlSkooLHipHop 1 year ago
peaple should not use nuclear for wepons only for energy
Mr2001hatem 1 year ago
@Mr2001hatem: Well, so far so good, then (excepting Japan, of course), eh?
puncheex 1 year ago
... the most devastating thing created by man is indifference for the suffering of others.
listenthinkspeak 1 year ago
Comment removed
listenthinkspeak 1 year ago
i wish nuclear bombs never exists
Mr2001hatem 1 year ago
i wish nuclear bombs never exists
Mr2001hatem 1 year ago
ww.youtube.com/watch?v=zCQat8_aTbE
user0423 1 year ago
Nukes aren't as devastating as people are lead to believe. Sure it's ugly ordeal to drop one into a major city where everything is so packed tightly together, but it's mainly the fallout that really causes the massive death toll in the end.
Tichondrius1 1 year ago
@Tichondrius1: No. The massive death toll id mainly from the traditional bomb effects: blast and heat.
puncheex 1 year ago
nuclear war rocks!
TechnoStickmen 1 year ago
Nuclear War Sucks! ¬¬
n3fiz3 1 year ago
Comment removed
n3fiz3 1 year ago
Comment removed
bluuuuuuh 1 year ago
Comment removed
MF0TY 1 year ago
its a good thing i have my Universal charger in handy :3
cocomunches 1 year ago
This video, entitled "nuclear power" features only "nuclear bombs". It is possible to use nuclear power with 100% certainty that it cannot result in a nuclear disaster.
Oh, did we forget that fact?
pburto 1 y