Turbo M3 vs 5.0 Mustang

[hazem203]

Theres 3 differnt types of E36 M3. 1 is light weight, 1 is regular, and the last one is a slower 1 because after '95 there were emision laws that made the later E36 models slower. Most you see are oftenly the slower ones but not all.

[tsoukiller50]

raced a 5.0 mustang pretty similar to this one in the video and I beat it with my stock e36 m3...I honestly thought I would lose because the engine sounded modified, but I guess I was mistaken. maybe it was the driver or the car or both, but w.e..///M Power

[brandon16holguin]

the bmw is slow with out that turbo. my friends 5.0 beats it all the time. so with a turbo on both cars the out come is 5.0 wins bmw cries because his fancy bmw lost to a pos ford.

[hockeyprep22]

5.sl0w

[castersen13]

put a turbo on the stang and see who wins

[marcrockett]

@castersen13 Put a turbo on both and the M3 stilll gets the win.

[toyoracing89]

@castersen13 I'm going with the 5.0. A buddy of mine has a Ranger with a 5L swap from a 80's-90's Foxbody and with just a cam, exhaust and tune he's putting 370HP to the ground...if you think about it, at most it was 900 dollars worth of parts and he's getting that. The M3 spent somewhere north of 2k for a turbo and another 1k for the work to make those numbers. The same money would put twinturbo's on a 5.0 and make it hit north of 500HP

[blackonblackseven]

fucking piece of shit ford mustang

[TheBaller357]

Wow you beat a stock mustang with a modded bmw

[Alex325iBMW]

@TheBaller357 the mustang is a 5.0 and m3 is 3.2 thats the point!

[kyleporter62]

smoked that bitch.

and im a chevy fan but

i would rather be cummin than strokin

but i would also rather have NOCAR THAN MOPAR

[twajumat2]

americans with their 5l engines....

[bobscoodles]

that M3 cost 7 to 8 times as much as that 5.0 and it is 20 years younger.

[M3TurboE46]

@bobscoodles Your an idiot I see those on craigslist for under 5K all day.....stop making excuses for ford's tiny under powered sorry excuses for a V8

[68mustangcoupe1]

@M3TurboE46 "You're" an idiot yourself apparently.

[M3TurboE46]

@68mustangcoupe1 lol you got me there.......lol what a douchebag

[hulkamania88382010]

@M3TurboE46 and who said my 5.0 was stock...idiot....

[hulkamania88382010]

@M3TurboE46 see your videos? okay and what is that suppose too prove? jack shit if you ask me...i have videos of my 5.0 too and you dont see me braggin about that shit...

[M3TurboE46]

@hulkamania88382010 If you watched my video's you wouldn't be calling me out that's the point I was not bragging, I just found it funny that you thought for a second that old shit box would have a chance

[hulkamania88382010]

@M3TurboE46 well i have one of those "shit boxes" and i know it would stand more of a chance than your "daddy's car"....and the sad thing is what model bmw was made in 87? the 325is wouldnt stand a chance against the 5.0 stock same year...point is if you havent already gotten it your putting a newer model bmw against an 80's stang oh better yet...hey look next time im gonna challenge a stock bmw and see who wins... genius...

[M3TurboE46]

@hulkamania88382010 fact is I would smoke your pos and you know it......its not my fault you chose the old shit box

[hulkamania88382010]

@M3TurboE46 okay kidd sure...hey do you also believe theres gold at the end of the rainbow?!? just saying...

[M3TurboE46]

@hulkamania88382010 lol I seen your video's 378RWHP even if you added 200RWHP since that video your still not even close......At the end of the day your car is still a ford and I have a BMW your not even in my league buddy!

[ez2memorize]

@Paulstathis1992

no. They are geared for the autobahn

[rodragui]

even my 530 can beat a 5.0

[krypekeeper]

@rodragui like to see it vs a 2011

[M3TurboE46]

@krypekeeper It would rape a 2011.....Did you not notice the 368RWHP that the 2011 mustang does not have???.......On top of that the car is like 1995

[krypekeeper]

@M3TurboE46 the 2011 GT actually puts 390 to the wheels moron

[M3TurboE46]

@krypekeeper My friend has one and it only put down 362RWHP, I don't know where you got your info from but I'm betting it was either ford or edmunds and edmunds favor's ford and lies for them don't believe me look it up......I could care less because my turbo M3 would dog walk a ford GT let alone a pathetic mustang

[hulkamania88382010]

@M3TurboE46 beat my ford buddy...

[M3TurboE46]

@hulkamania88382010 736RWHP mean's I will dog your old shit box 5.Slow. You obviously didn't check my videos

[blazinloud]

@rodragui i would hope so for an extra 20 or 30g's new, retard

[ez2memorize]

but its not geared for the 1\4 mile

[Calicharlie202]

m powah !~~

[ez2memorize]

All M series BMW's are tuned for the autobahn. so take a 5.0 and have SVT fuck with it. moron

[SimpsonvilleRecords]

They are tuned for the track. M= Motorsport

[bpoolman2003]

@SimpsonvilleRecords not 1/4 mile though. M3's are designed for corners.

[Paulstathis1992]

@ez2memorize theres american bmws and european bmws, the european bmws are tuned for the autobahn, not american ones

[ez2memorize]

your a fucking moron jlubez. throw that turbo setup in the stang and i bet you'll have more than 368rwhp. dont comment if you don't know what the fuck your talking about

[jlubez]

how do i not know what im talking about? all im saying is the new m3 motor is a 4.0 V8, which is less than 5.0 in case you cant count, and at the redline of 8,400 rpm's (about 3,200 rpms more than a mustang redline) it generates 414 hp. No turbo, just gas. so now you see why i said that its sad that a 5.0 V8 only hits about 220hp. so do your research next time you want to pick a fight. fool

[crabpeoples]

@jlubez keyword "new", that mustang is from like 1989 or something, it redlines at like 5,500 and has low compression, but i still love 5.0's, but hey if i had 40k to blow on a car i'd buy a newer m3.

[jlubez]

@crabpeoples yeah thats true, but then again a 1989 e30 m3 has a 2.3 liter 4 cylinder and again no turbo just gas put out about 215 hp. i mean as you can tell i love bmw:) but i do like mustangs also. In my opinion i fell like older American muscle was big motors low power output. just my 2 cents

[608gamer07]

They lied about the power numbers to lower the insurance costs. That was back in the 60s and early 70s though.

[jlubez]

yeah thats why were talking about 1985 to 1993 ish cars......

[608gamer07]

yeah. well lets see bmw rated it for 215 and ford rated the 5.0L for 225 but it had 275lb-ft. not sure what the m3 had. but then again during the 80s american companies were pressured into making vehicles that sucked because of the "oil crisis" during the late 70s early 80s. do you know what the compression was on that 2.3L?

[jlubez]

yeah i know what your talking about, both engines are de tuned. the m3 motor is a detuned F1 engine and the mustang engine is just detuned. im pretty sure the e30 2.5 4 cyl has around 175 to 200 for compression. what about the mustang?

[608gamer07]

like 150-160. so it seems like it was really detuned!  9.2:1 compression ratio. and i think i was wrong with the rated hps. i think it had 235hp and 285lb-ft. but still i think 150-160 is still rather low.

[jlubez]

yeah it was a rather low compression motor, as were a lot of american cars from that year. my dad has a 89 firebird with a 5.0 and it also has only 225 hp. dont get me wrong its a sweet car my friend has one and i enjoy riding in especially when he through in a supercharger but i just love a car that handles like a monster and is still pretty quick

[608gamer07]

No that's understandable. But you know that there are a million mods for mustangs especially suspension. Take a stock mustang throw a set of Eibach lowering springs, front and rear sway bar, front strut tower, after market shocks and struts and some rear upper and lower control arms and you're driving circles around 90 percent of cars on the road. It doesn't take a "whole" lot. Takes more than an M3 of course but you don't have to pay M3 prices lol. Both are fun cars.

[jlubez]

yeah but i mean my friends done so many suspension mods, im sure he could have done more (its actually his dads car its perfectly mint and he did everything really good) but it still suffers from understeer and my stock 89 325si i paied 4k for still just reacts better. even he agrees. but it most defiantly handles way way better than tons of cars on the road. he absolutely destroys me in the strait though lol is that your mustang in your uploads?

[608gamer07]

Yeah that's my stang. Not too many suspension mods. Tokico shocks and struts and Ford Racing lowering springs and that's about it, but I wanna do more with the suspension just haven't gotten around to it lol.

[jlubez]

whats sad is that a 5.0 v8 cant even hit 380 hp

[StopTheMelting]

whats sad is all you dummies that go on about peak horsepower. Peak horsepower doesn't mean much. its all about how long your power band is I.E the longer and flatter the HP and torque curves are on the dyno sheet the better. In other words you don't need to make 380HP on a stock 5.0L to run in the 12's. And one thing i've learned over the years torque wins a lot of races.

[nxmoparmatt84]

its all about torque in my book

[ThorAxeTheThunder]

torque isnt everything man xD

[MegaCobraCommander]

why are people giving my comment a thumbs down..im speaking in logic..i dont hate mustangs at all.. i have 2..but a bone stock mustang has no chance against this car. (225hp vs 368hp) honestly we dont even know if these guys were "racing" or just seeing what times they could get...but as anyone can tell..these no way the mustang could be competitive at its current setup unless money was put into it and that was all i was saying

[maliq32]

I Agree.

[lawson4323]

I'm a proud owner of a e36 with a 302ci swap from a 5.o mustang and all I have to say is if that mustang had the same about of money into it as the bmw did the mustang would have won hands down.

[MegaCobraCommander]

What was the point of this race..ha..5.0 only has 225 at the crank and this guys got 368 to the wheels..mustang owner should have saved the money spent on the gas and put it toward a new car or a vortech..

[suprbird]

a 408w foxbody would walk a twin turbo m3

[Roman007M]

My Favorite E36 ///M3 Color - Estoril Blue!

[GDIcommando]

FUCK BEAMERS

[jocorleone86]

bmw !!! normal les muscle cars font plus de bruit quel avance lol

[elprado75]

jajajajajajajajjaaj fuck the american carrrr peace offf shiieatttttttttttttttt MPOWERRRRRRR BMW RULEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS THE BEST CAR EVERRRRRRRR

[3O2MuStAnG]

LOL ye a M3 IS A GREAT CAR ... too bad you will never own one.

drive your bicycle.

oh it´s so wondeful to live in germany ... BMWs are so cheap over here ... hell yeah ... less money for power,quality and style

[camvvti]

u make m3 sound like its impossible to buy

[dos195]

Dude, I can get a used 95' ///M3 for 4 grand over here on the West Coast of the USA in perfect condition.

[3O2MuStAnG]

in my opinion the stang was very good (FOR STOCK)

cuz it was a m3 with turbo ... this m3 got 320hp without turbo.

[jacklorch]

its an e36 m3 which has around 240hp stock..unless its the european version which has 280hp

[bmdu69]

yeah maybe ..... but the mustang is good car too!

[lekocaj23]

still the m3 would win with the stock 320 hp

[pene3333]

excuses excuses excuses mate, even without the turbo

[3O2MuStAnG]

excuses ?

HAHAHAHAHA did I miss something ?

I said the M3 is a great car ... and read the description ... it´s a modded M3 with 368Hp

225Hp vs 368Hp

in this case it was a good race.

end of the story.

[commanderkool]

is there a point to burning out besides showing off?

[jacklorch]

warms the tires which makes them grip better

[raineman666]

only if they are slicks....burning out does nothing unless you have slicks....

[ytubeturk]

ok

that mustang was not turbo

and i think you could of figured that out when a bmw is just as heavy because its german no turbo mustang is running that slow idc how small the turbo is especially if its a 5.0

[jigz737]

my point exactly these fuckin morons get so hype when some dick head writes the wrong info on the title

[mustangfan1990]

WHat did that bmw run? Looked real slow to me

[dodge69874]

I heard something about 8.something and then 10.something. Might be the times. It's in spanish.

[beamerman25]

i dont care who you are. you cant sit there and tell me that an m3 and a mustang with the same hp would be even or that the mustang would win. you guys say the m3 is 150hp more. well give the mustang the same hp and it would still loose cuz its heavy and a piece of shit. heres a comparison. 2007 mustang gt 0-60 5.1 if your an amazing driver which ur not. 2007 bmw 335 o-60 4.8 automatic so theres ur proof 2 cars same hp and the bmw is faster.

[jigz737]

ur fuckin stupid 4 even sayin mustangs r heavy im sick and tierd of yall stupid imports sayin dumbshit.FORDS R NOT HEAVY ONLY STANGS THAT R HEAVY R 05 AND UP,EVERY STANG FROM 04 AND BACK "EXC COBRAS"R LIGHT AND THE REAR SIT TO DAMN HIGH THATS Y THERES NO CONTROL.so please get ur fact stright b4 u talk any shit

[beamerman25]

fuck you u dumbass you know shit about cars... your just talking out of your ass and just cant admit american cars are shit because your a stupid fuckin redneck

[jigz737]

first off u dick im from ny, 2nd im balck not white, third ur gay ass is mad cause u dont even drive u young bitch.and third thanx 4 the complment i really do know my cars like that. next time u write sumthin make sure it makes sense u stupid bitch

[Youngt191]

learn to count blacky.

[jigz737]

tell ur mom to suck my dick cracker

[dodge69874]

1991 Mustang GT weighs 2824 lbs. Since when is that fucking heavy? A 1991 BMW M3 weighs 2867. Which is 43 lbs. more. At the same time, the Mustang puts out 225 hp while the M3 put out 192 hp. You talk so much shit about American cars but compare it to a similar German car and you'll see the truth.

[gtdrummerdude]

A '91 GT weighs about 3300 lbs actually... I have an '82 LX which is about the lightest fox body you can get. The early '80s Mustangs are lighter than the later ones and the LX body is lighter than the GT. My Mustang weighs 2920 confirmed on a sanctioned scale and a '90s GT is nowhere near that.

[RoganSF]

by cuttingg off your mullet, you can cut down your coef. of drag by .05 might help, and just a suggestion

[macaddict3032]

That's because the M3 has 150 more Hp at the wheels. Duh?!?!

[MetalicB0x]

turbo m3 just murdered it... performance wise. speed wise. and style wise.

[BillysBMW]

oh my god turbo on m3 rullezzzz!!!!

thge mustang its an awesome car but not like this m3!!!

bmw gone shootin!!!

[vipexperformance]

anyone who spells 'rules' with a 'Z' instead of an 's' is a butt fucker

[BillysBMW]

you must be in extasy

[SatanicSepp]

the m3 started too early

[beamerman25]

american cars are shit ans so are they're drivers

[cshmny101]

i'll agree american cars suck, but not all american drivers do.. just the idiots who would buy a mustang over a bmw or mercedes.

[ownagemastery]

Your the biggest moron on youtube.. A M5 BMW would lose to a Shelby gt500 and it costs about $80,000 more to buy. Show me how its better?

[beamerman25]

your a fuckin idiot. you compare a gt500 to an m5. look at car reviews and you'll notice that the gt500 is a piece of shit mustang with a 5.4 liter engine with more hp. the m5 can keep up with the gt500 and also in style and luxury. and another thing the gt500 and the m5 are totally different cars and you just showed you know nothing about cars with the comparison

[Ice3power]

GT500's handle like boats and are just Mustangs with a body kit and a supercharger. Oh, and some chrome trim with a different shifter knob. M5 would shit all over a GT500, especially in top end and on a track.

[jigz737]

as much as i really hate to admit it ur right and im a mustang fan and i own 1.the gt500 is just to damn heavy only good for drag and sprint runs other than that they suck but...foxbodys and sn-95 mustangs r a diffrent story

[dodge69874]

What about the GT500 Super Snake with 650-725hp?

[jigz737]

well the horsepower is cool and all but being that its very front end heavy, all that horsepower doesnt really mean a thing

[dodge69874]

you just said heavy before. and i figured all that power would offset its heaviness.

[jigz737]

well in a way yes only if its modded

[ownagemastery]

lol is that why BMWs have the most engine stalls???? Or is that why foreign drivers cause the most accidents?

[rancor169]

bracket racing - they left at different times

[blacktigerwu]

who was driving the 5.0 ...Ms.Daisy?

[jackdanielz818]

bmw's are for faggets

[NinjaShadow41]

wow, your so right. a very well engineered car, from another country is for faggets. thats why you nickname is jackdanielz, and thats why your uneducated dumb-ass opinion doesn't matter.

[swingman026]

go jump in ur model T pickup and drive off a cliff u dumb piece of shit,

[two66mhz]

Mustangs are for the queer to make them feel like a real man, it is ok to come out of your closet now we all know...

[d0mestics]

number one the m3 was turbo the mustang was prob stock or close to it .. a turbo will be a supercharger in the long run like thats common sense ... and dont even rip on mustangs especially the 5.0 .. has one of the best reputations out there idc what u say

[two66mhz]

I actually don't like either but really don't like mustangs they may have good rep, but if you remember the marketing for the mustang is "Affordable Performance" not like corvette or viper which is "HIGH Performance" of american muscle the mustangs lacks that, watch Jeremy Clarkeson for Top Gear he race a New Mustang against a real Mustang (I do mean horse... The finish might surprise you....

[drewbrown68]

are you serious

[two66mhz]

Dead serious, I base it on cold hard fact...

[drewbrown68]

i was being sarcastic

i cant believe you just ocmpared a car to a horse

and id rather have affordable performance than "high" performance when "affordable" performance could be made "high" performance for less than a "high" performance car

[two66mhz]

I never thought some one would still compare a car to horse anymore, but some one did, based on the fact that the car or horseless carriage, was what replace the horse back in the day.

[two66mhz]

The funny fact is for the amount money and time (most costly aspect) they still can't hang in the corners with a corvette that is worth as much money the car and adds you put on to it... Stangs have only been good at one thing a straight line... there is NO HIGH or any performance unless you can make it around a corner or stop in a timely manner both of which a SVT Cobra couldn't even compare to a stock corvette.

[drewbrown68]

a corvette is what, 60k dollars?

a fox mustang..for a nice looking one is about 4k

so you're saying with 56k dollars you cant make a mustang faster than a vette?

[two66mhz]

Not true you can find used to find and still can find C3 and C2 corvettes that still to this day waste on the stang... You talking 5.0 and old piece, I'm not saying ZO6 jerky... If you look and look I have found ugly vettes that run great for cheap.

[drewbrown68]

and a 5.0 will still run greatER for cheapER than a vette

that isnt even an arguement

[two66mhz]

Ignorance is bliss isn't it. Bet you haven't heard the statement, "You can't polish a terd"

[drewbrown68]

give me a terd and some polish and ill show you

[jonis1990]

m3 e36 1992-1995 286hp

m3 e36 1996-1998 321hp

m3 e46 1998-2006 343hp (m3 csl 360hp)

m3 e92 2007-.... 420hp

[n3g4tory]

um sorry but a stock e36 m3 bhp is acutally 240. i have one.

[dieslking]

M3 Kicked ASS!!!!!

[missesalot]

You guys know nothing.....lets do the math.

I own an e36 m. So. thats a 97 because of the color. So 245 bhp stock. NOT 240.

Thats 210 whp. Now, 368whp is NOT the bhp. Its whp. So after some math, your running 435bhp.

An Exhaust, chip, intake with get you about 30hp and 12whp. BIG difference. Mine put down 217whp. So i will run about 13.8 1\4

Only the e46 is 333bhp. They put about 275-300 to the rear wheels. An e36 with 300bhp with rape any e46 333bhp m3.

[jesusquintero16]

es el vanico i el negro perdiendo una carrera una de las tantas

[mississauga5litre]

wtf? you lost beener?

[elprado75]

ford loserrrrrrrrrrrrr BMW WINNERRR MPOWERRRRRRRRRRRRRR

[lyden2006]

im not sure that guy knew how to drive his foxi know i woulda run a bit harder, good show tho by the m3

[Feat06]

iamsuperman420, that is actually a e36 m3 that originially made 240 hp so if ya do the math he's making 128hp over stock, so that is not shabby at all

[Mesarina]

depends of what year M3 it is...

still its whp, not 30hp like iamsuperman420 said...

30 more horses for an intake and exhaust.. maybe like 10whp lol..

[iamsuperman420]

368rwhp M3 with a turbo? wow y spend like 10 grand on a turbo kit and install for 30 horsepower? haha id get an intake and exhaust and a chip and make more than 30 more horses for like 8 grand less

[Docthewrench]

WHY do meatheads instint on bragging on beating stock stangs LOL, them stangs are SLOW even stang owners know it race something closer to your class and brag wait let me get my 2 years old tricycle out and you can brag god people tricycle vs F22 Raptor RAPTOR dude will brag he won but its NOT much to brag about its a DOH loser of course you did

[Pringle15]

That guy in the 5.0 needs to learn how to drag.

[dpimp2u]

5.0 win or lose

[Iloveslaking]

Spoken Like a true Fanboy.

[MICRII]

i to kolejny raz pokazuje ze amerykanie nie umieja robić samochodów tylko frytki z mcdonalda

[Armazecreta]

hey esto en en mexicali baja drag no?

[cornman68]

mustang had a bad launch

[corvetteguy25]

5.SLOW

[7upstang91]

5.slow said the guy with the vette. I eat your vette diner. just kidding. i ment breakfast, lunch, and diner my bad

[softwareguy256]

mustang got cooked

[willnav]

esta lento! solo 8's en 1/8 con 417rwhp.

[m3boost]

era 368 rwhp a 92 mph en el 1/8... Ya estoy en 7.8 a 96 mph...

[willnav]

ok, ahora hace mas sentido. . .

[crabtr]

abi o kac model mustang 70 ler falan mi