@MrDustock And we had given them ears and eyes and hearts, but neither their ears,nor their eyes, nor their hearts availed them aught, since they deny the revelations of Allah, and that which they mocked at encompassed them.
@MrDustock Its Gods will to establish his religion on Earth when he said in the Holy Koran; chapter 24,verse55; Allah has promise to those of you who believe and do good that He will most certainly make them rulers in the Earth as He made rulers those before them, and that He will most certainly establish for them their religion which He has chosen for them, and that He will most certainly, after their fear, give them security in exchange; they shall serve Me not associating aught with Me
WTF? you people are totally bigots, just talking nonsense without the slightest hint of truth. What the hell is he saying? I am totally kuwaiti and it has been a country since the 18th century.. After the independence ALOT of Iraqis tried to come to kuwait but only a small amount were allowed to enter and get the citizenship. I respect George for his stances, but this is totally bullshit.. I bet Sadam paid him really well for this.. FREE KUWAIT
Kuwaitis are part Iraqi and part Irani whether those retards want to admit or not. Fuck them I say anyways. Lousy cowardice slave owners. Not one single inch of Kuwait was constructed by a kuwaiti. They're all a bunch a fat fucktarded uneducated empty souled people. They just drive around in circles and have indians, pakistanis, srilankans, philipinos, indoniesians, egyptians, lebanese,british, and americans do all the work. They live in a welfare country and they think it's wealth.
dude i lived in kuwait for about 7 years i asked my friends where there ancestors from for school and like 3 quarters of them were from bagdad or southern iraq
Kindly visit the next site were you will find sold profes about Kuwait: "Center for Research and Studies on Kuwait". I totally disagree with Mr. Galloway about his opinion about "Kuwait" being part of Iraq!!! Kuwait was NOT even part of the Othmani Empire!! Were Iraq was! THIS IS NOT FAIR AT ALL.. To History or Kuwait sake indeed.
You fucking retard! You just stated that it was called kout and not kuwait at the time of the ottoman. Arab sellout degenerates like your brit cock slurping ancestors fucked the persian gulf up and ended up even weaker!
The cartographer Isaak Tirion drew the first Dutch map , which showed Kazima as a main port overlooking the coast, in 1732. Afterwards, a number of maps were issued such as brothers R. and J. Ottens map and the German publisher J.B. Homann which were issued in 1737. Kazima opposite to Failaka Island appeared on the maps of the French cartographer Bonne who published a collection of the Gulf maps between 1760 and 1780.
Slot in his book The Origins of Kuwait, shows that the map of N. Sanson which was published in 1652, was the first to have the name of Kazima. On this map Kazima was not exactly placed. It was located far off shore. There is a clear political border on this map, which intersected it from Basra. There is another print of Sansons map issued in 1654 where he corrected Kazimas position. He approached it to the coast.
So you are telling me that Kuwait didn't gain independence from British Colonialism in 1961?? Which in case it breezed by you in the wind, that British forces strategically placed them selves there in the 1930's when oil was discovered and cut away from Iraq? Go from the fiction section to non-fiction you imbecile.
u stupid stupid man the ruler of kuwait at the time Mubarak , went to the british himself u ignorant man he went because he didnt want the ottoman rule so he asked help from the brittish get ur facts straight ur the imbecile if u want to come over to kuwait and check it out instead of acting like a history professor ur most welcome u coward thats the problem with people like u , u dont check on ur facts
@NukeFascistAmerica that's total bullshit, he isn't right.. nothing he states is a fact. Kuwait was never part of Iraq, and it wasnt' carved up by the Brits. As much as I'd like to believe that interesting story, it aint true. Kuwait and its known Arabian tribes have been around since the 1700's and then made an alliance with the Ottomans that they later broke in 1899 with the Brits. I respect george, but here in the video... if you notice he doesn;t even justify his answers! shame on you
but galloway beleives hezbollah and hamas have a right to bomb jews in israel for the same exact point he makes for spain and N. Ireland. what a douchebag
You're suggesting Israel annexed its neighbors' territories and that the people's whose land was stolen shouldn't retaliate? For historical reasons, the Spanish and the Irish who's land was confiscated may have moved on and accepted the reality, Palestinians and Lebanese aren't.
Get this straight: Israel's expansion ambitions are being met with serious and perfectly legitimate resistance by Hamas and Hezbollah, and it won't end anytime soon.
Keep slandering Galloway, you're making his point.
israel cant be blamed because arabs dont think like rational people. hamas and hezbollah are terrorist groups. you cant show me any international law that protects hamas and hezbollah, dont give me ur muslim rhetoric. i want an acutal treaty or convention that actually says that hezbollah and hamas have a right to bomb civlians. show me, dont tell me. galloway has business interests with muslim terrorists. dont bother poster rhetoric, i want proof.
You want to speak about international law? Then tell me about the one state in the entire 20th century that ignores any and all forms of intl law from the Geneva conventions to the nuclear non proliferation treaty, while at the same time defying more UN resolutions than all other states put together?
Hezbollah and Hamas have prevented Israel from achieving its objective: expansion of its territory through force, in utter defiance of the most elementary morality, international consensus and law.
blah blah blah, you posted nothing but arab propaganda. with israels military they could own the mid-east so your hitler like paranoia of jews is a laugh. hezbollah and hamas are no match for israel. israel gave gaza back to terrorists which was a mistake. now please show me what international law protects hezbollah and hamas. show me, dont tell me. you have one last chance.
And BTW, this is far from Muslim rhetoric, it's the shared view of the Geneva high contracting parties, the majority of the UN assembly, and indeed the entire world bar Israel, the US and submissive marginal exceptions.
Regarding rationality, we must have different notions of it! Hezbollah and Hamas are quite rational: you violate my sovereignty and kill my people, I retaliate! Simple, and as the Hezbollah events of 2000 and 20006 show, quite effective. Sorry, they won't have it your way!
sure, hamas and hezbollah who are 2 extremist muslim groups are rational. sure sure, we all beleive you. its very rational to fire homemade rockets at civilians when you know a missle will be a response. its also rational to throw stones at a military superpower. we all know its rational to deny a countries right to exist after they have kicked your ass repeatedly over a 60 year period. yes, the rational palestinains have alot to show for it. you act like u have a summer home in gaza. LOLOLOL
You are a zionist propogandist. You expect the people of palestine to just sit down and let Isreal carry on bombing them to death with no retaliation? You must be an absolute moron if thats what you think. Hamas and Hezbollah are not two terrorist organisations, they are fighting for their country back, which is completely rational, if you dont think of it from a zionist point of view. More and more people are waking up to these truths, i think you should too.
you must be a raghead. getting their country back??? israel withdrew from lebanon you moron and israel left gaza only to get more rockets fired on. the fact you side with extremist muslims is actually funny since i bet you dont even beleive god. you are probably a left wing atheist who hates jews. you are godless who sides with the most extreme religous groups in the muslim world. talk about a hypocrite. you would be like a christian who supports marxism, LOLOLOLOLOLOL. go to hell
Expansion is the word that characterizes Israel's political ambitions.
The current vicious program of annexation of the West Bank, the wall (considered illegal by the World Court in a unanimous judgement), and the splitting up of the valuable land, as well as the 20-odd years of South Lebanese occupation is exactly what everyone but you sees: an expansion program.
goerge galloway is wrong here kuwait was never part of Iraq. When kuwait was first was a country oil was not descovered in the land. after it was a full cillized country country the oil was descovered it was never stolen. And it was way more for them to steal any more.
castorino88, Oil was first discovered in Kuwait in the 1930s and the government became more proactive in establishing internationally recognized boundaries. On June 19, 1961, Kuwait became fully independent.
Simple wiki research. Don't talk say "When kuwait was first was a country oil was not descovered in the land." It was a country created by greedy ppl and the British for wanting to deal in the oil.
Prt2: But , strangely....we started a war.I am not 100% sure but I believe Saddam was searching for "sponsors" all over the world, his land needed support(money) after the years of war against Iran, BUT(!), here comes the keypoint, The West refused this and only wanted to support Iraq with weapons. In a mindset so obvious Saddam must have thought that he could take the money by taking back Kuwait....and the outcome is known..:(
Saddam didn't want to repay his debts, that's why he went after quwait. The US is still responsible for saddam, with the help of the CIA he managed to become the dicatator he was.
No it does not. But the Arabs should get together and form a single nation (at least on the Eastern end of the Arab world). Their division is a cause of the US domination of the region.
What documents? Are you talking about the documents reported by the Telegraph and the Christian Science Monitor which have repeatedly been proven to be forgeries?
The history of Kuwait goes back to the year 1613 AD, long before the British empire, Mr Galloway is just sucking up to his Iraqi constituents. Need I remind you that he was talking about Edgware Rd. which might as well be in the middle of Baghdad.
The purpose of the current war in Iraq is different-- privatize all of Iraq's public capital and resources, using force. Bush and the neocons, and well the whole political class of the US, has mixed up privatization and democracy-- which is why they all loved Boris Yeltsin and hate Hugo Chavez. When Bush talks about democracy, he's really talking about neoliberalism and more privatization.
Thank you Richard for your quick understanding, it clearly shows that you're not a warmonger and indeed you're a true British, unlike those who pretend to be on your side, using the " our Boys are doing a good job" while in fact all they do is killing people who did nothing to them, in the first place.
What George Galloway is great at is breaking down the inherent brainwashing and hypocrisy of Western people.
OrthodoxDarwinist 10 months ago
@MrDustock And we had given them ears and eyes and hearts, but neither their ears,nor their eyes, nor their hearts availed them aught, since they deny the revelations of Allah, and that which they mocked at encompassed them.
sayyada1000 1 year ago
@MrDustock ......and whoever is ungrateful after this, these it is who are the transgressors.
sayyada1000 1 year ago
@MrDustock Its Gods will to establish his religion on Earth when he said in the Holy Koran; chapter 24,verse55; Allah has promise to those of you who believe and do good that He will most certainly make them rulers in the Earth as He made rulers those before them, and that He will most certainly establish for them their religion which He has chosen for them, and that He will most certainly, after their fear, give them security in exchange; they shall serve Me not associating aught with Me
sayyada1000 1 year ago
@MrDustock when and where?
sayyada1000 1 year ago
And they ( the Christians) will not cease fighting you until they turn you back from your religion. (islam) (2:217)
sayyada1000 1 year ago
The British caused a lot of problems by carving up the world.
sayyada1000 1 year ago 2
WTF? you people are totally bigots, just talking nonsense without the slightest hint of truth. What the hell is he saying? I am totally kuwaiti and it has been a country since the 18th century.. After the independence ALOT of Iraqis tried to come to kuwait but only a small amount were allowed to enter and get the citizenship. I respect George for his stances, but this is totally bullshit.. I bet Sadam paid him really well for this.. FREE KUWAIT
Donzq8 1 year ago
Kuwaitis are part Iraqi and part Irani whether those retards want to admit or not. Fuck them I say anyways. Lousy cowardice slave owners. Not one single inch of Kuwait was constructed by a kuwaiti. They're all a bunch a fat fucktarded uneducated empty souled people. They just drive around in circles and have indians, pakistanis, srilankans, philipinos, indoniesians, egyptians, lebanese,british, and americans do all the work. They live in a welfare country and they think it's wealth.
zephonlucifer 1 year ago
long live gorge
skibb19 2 years ago 5
Galloway tells it as it is - he tells the truth!!!!
This video deserves to be favourited!!
Tonyo1221 2 years ago 4
Kuwait is in no way part of Iraq
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago 2
It was part of the british/ottoman territory of mesopatamia which was iraq and kuwait
ialrai 2 years ago
no it wasnt
kuwait was called kout!!!!
way before the ottoman empire came into the the arabian peninsula
get ur facts straight
kuwait was never part of iraq
never was , never will be
we signed an agreement with the british to fend off the ottomans
dont open ur mouth if u dont have ur facts straight
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago 2
dude i lived in kuwait for about 7 years i asked my friends where there ancestors from for school and like 3 quarters of them were from bagdad or southern iraq
Ok im trying to start a debate man
ialrai 2 years ago
man im from KUWAIT
and dont lie and say that most kuwaitis r from iraq
60% percent of kuwaities r from bedouin tribes scattered in what is now called saudi arabia
the other 30 percent r from iran
and 20 percent dont know where they r from
get ur facts straight ,people needlesly died because of what they r fed and u r one of these people
women raped because saddam said we were a part of iraq
if u really want to know ask me and i will tell u
my family lived in kuwait for the past 400 years
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago 2
ok im kinda done arguing im from america but lived in kuwait thats all not gonna argue
ialrai 2 years ago
good dont argue
becuase it isnt ur argument in the first place
this is a very sensitive subject for us
because alot of kuwaities died from these lies
please make sure ur facts r straight next time before saying anything about anything.
make sure u read about stuff , not what people tell u
see the treaty that kuwait signed
check the west indian trading company
then u will know
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago 2
the last one was 10 percent
sorry
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
Kindly visit the next site were you will find sold profes about Kuwait: "Center for Research and Studies on Kuwait". I totally disagree with Mr. Galloway about his opinion about "Kuwait" being part of Iraq!!! Kuwait was NOT even part of the Othmani Empire!! Were Iraq was! THIS IS NOT FAIR AT ALL.. To History or Kuwait sake indeed.
RayofAverroes 3 years ago
Kuwait didn't even exist during the ottoman empire you fucking idiot!
usardogcuntcrabs 2 years ago
Lol yah man give it to him hard...
I just love how dump ass people hang themselves with their own words.
Kuwait was a part of Iraq.
sataricon111 2 years ago
fuck u
they were not
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago 2
yes they did
u stupid man
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago 2
u fucking asshole yes kuwait existed
kuwait existed way before the U.S.A
and we signed the agreement with the brittish to fend off the ottomans
we were called KOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
You fucking retard! You just stated that it was called kout and not kuwait at the time of the ottoman. Arab sellout degenerates like your brit cock slurping ancestors fucked the persian gulf up and ended up even weaker!
usardogcuntcrabs 2 years ago
yes? and ur point
it was called alkout ? so?
arabs we r all going to hell anyways might as well enjoy the ride
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
The cartographer Isaak Tirion drew the first Dutch map , which showed Kazima as a main port overlooking the coast, in 1732. Afterwards, a number of maps were issued such as brothers R. and J. Ottens map and the German publisher J.B. Homann which were issued in 1737. Kazima opposite to Failaka Island appeared on the maps of the French cartographer Bonne who published a collection of the Gulf maps between 1760 and 1780.
RayofAverroes 3 years ago
Slot in his book The Origins of Kuwait, shows that the map of N. Sanson which was published in 1652, was the first to have the name of Kazima. On this map Kazima was not exactly placed. It was located far off shore. There is a clear political border on this map, which intersected it from Basra. There is another print of Sansons map issued in 1654 where he corrected Kazimas position. He approached it to the coast.
RayofAverroes 3 years ago
i support geoarge however his information about kuwait was never stolen from iraq
bobyloopo 3 years ago 3
Well than read a book or two.
6Ott7 2 years ago
kuwait was not stolen from iraq u read
bobyloopo 2 years ago
Whatever you say boss.
6Ott7 2 years ago
thats right u stupid stupid boy
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
listen u ignorant shit
kuwait was never part o iraq
u read books about kuwait
we didnt have borders
yes kazma was part of iraq
but thats it
part of kuwait was taken from saudi now
do we go and invade them ?
what about kurdistan ? y did iraq take it from the kurds?
u dont know anything , so i would suggest u shut the hell up.
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
So you are telling me that Kuwait didn't gain independence from British Colonialism in 1961?? Which in case it breezed by you in the wind, that British forces strategically placed them selves there in the 1930's when oil was discovered and cut away from Iraq? Go from the fiction section to non-fiction you imbecile.
6Ott7 2 years ago
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
get ur facts straight
u ignorant person
maybe your country was part of the British empire
its not my problem
but aint no fucking Babylonian country is part of kuwait
fuck u , if u believe Kuwait is part of iraq
if u want the real history u take it from the source , not from ur head
the arabian peninsula is for KUWAIT SAUDI OMAN BAHRAIN QATAR UAE AND YEMEN
so dont forget about that
mubarak al kabeer went to the british ,because the ottomans wanted to expand to all the arabian peninsula
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
mubarak aided alsaood the rulers of saudi now
against the alrasheed family who were with the ottomans
the story is factual to all realistic people
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
Anglo-Ottoman Convention of 1913
hehe
oil was discovered in kuwait in 1936
so if britain had the magic oracle , then im sorry
it was the otomans who put kuwait with iraq
and that treaty separated the facts from reality
lol ur pathetoc talking about oil
and at that time oil wasnt even discovered
get ur FACTS STRAIGHT and YOUR DATES STRAIGHT
a 20 year difference is a long time imbecile
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
George is right.
NukeFascistAmerica 3 years ago 6
@NukeFascistAmerica that's total bullshit, he isn't right.. nothing he states is a fact. Kuwait was never part of Iraq, and it wasnt' carved up by the Brits. As much as I'd like to believe that interesting story, it aint true. Kuwait and its known Arabian tribes have been around since the 1700's and then made an alliance with the Ottomans that they later broke in 1899 with the Brits. I respect george, but here in the video... if you notice he doesn;t even justify his answers! shame on you
Donzq8 10 months ago
he never said what? he never praised hussein for his courage? LOLOL
robertk2007 3 years ago
but galloway beleives hezbollah and hamas have a right to bomb jews in israel for the same exact point he makes for spain and N. Ireland. what a douchebag
robertk2007 3 years ago
You're suggesting Israel annexed its neighbors' territories and that the people's whose land was stolen shouldn't retaliate? For historical reasons, the Spanish and the Irish who's land was confiscated may have moved on and accepted the reality, Palestinians and Lebanese aren't.
Get this straight: Israel's expansion ambitions are being met with serious and perfectly legitimate resistance by Hamas and Hezbollah, and it won't end anytime soon.
Keep slandering Galloway, you're making his point.
bruckner26 3 years ago 2
israel cant be blamed because arabs dont think like rational people. hamas and hezbollah are terrorist groups. you cant show me any international law that protects hamas and hezbollah, dont give me ur muslim rhetoric. i want an acutal treaty or convention that actually says that hezbollah and hamas have a right to bomb civlians. show me, dont tell me. galloway has business interests with muslim terrorists. dont bother poster rhetoric, i want proof.
robertk2007 3 years ago
You want to speak about international law? Then tell me about the one state in the entire 20th century that ignores any and all forms of intl law from the Geneva conventions to the nuclear non proliferation treaty, while at the same time defying more UN resolutions than all other states put together?
Hezbollah and Hamas have prevented Israel from achieving its objective: expansion of its territory through force, in utter defiance of the most elementary morality, international consensus and law.
bruckner26 3 years ago
blah blah blah, you posted nothing but arab propaganda. with israels military they could own the mid-east so your hitler like paranoia of jews is a laugh. hezbollah and hamas are no match for israel. israel gave gaza back to terrorists which was a mistake. now please show me what international law protects hezbollah and hamas. show me, dont tell me. you have one last chance.
robertk2007 3 years ago
And BTW, this is far from Muslim rhetoric, it's the shared view of the Geneva high contracting parties, the majority of the UN assembly, and indeed the entire world bar Israel, the US and submissive marginal exceptions.
Regarding rationality, we must have different notions of it! Hezbollah and Hamas are quite rational: you violate my sovereignty and kill my people, I retaliate! Simple, and as the Hezbollah events of 2000 and 20006 show, quite effective. Sorry, they won't have it your way!
bruckner26 3 years ago
sure, hamas and hezbollah who are 2 extremist muslim groups are rational. sure sure, we all beleive you. its very rational to fire homemade rockets at civilians when you know a missle will be a response. its also rational to throw stones at a military superpower. we all know its rational to deny a countries right to exist after they have kicked your ass repeatedly over a 60 year period. yes, the rational palestinains have alot to show for it. you act like u have a summer home in gaza. LOLOLOL
robertk2007 3 years ago
You are a zionist propogandist. You expect the people of palestine to just sit down and let Isreal carry on bombing them to death with no retaliation? You must be an absolute moron if thats what you think. Hamas and Hezbollah are not two terrorist organisations, they are fighting for their country back, which is completely rational, if you dont think of it from a zionist point of view. More and more people are waking up to these truths, i think you should too.
Technique09 3 years ago 2
you must be a raghead. getting their country back??? israel withdrew from lebanon you moron and israel left gaza only to get more rockets fired on. the fact you side with extremist muslims is actually funny since i bet you dont even beleive god. you are probably a left wing atheist who hates jews. you are godless who sides with the most extreme religous groups in the muslim world. talk about a hypocrite. you would be like a christian who supports marxism, LOLOLOLOLOLOL. go to hell
robertk2007 3 years ago
israels expansion?? wow, all that land they have since 1948. i cant beleive it.... LOLOL
robertk2007 3 years ago
Expansion is the word that characterizes Israel's political ambitions.
The current vicious program of annexation of the West Bank, the wall (considered illegal by the World Court in a unanimous judgement), and the splitting up of the valuable land, as well as the 20-odd years of South Lebanese occupation is exactly what everyone but you sees: an expansion program.
bruckner26 3 years ago 2
sorry but i dont understand y shouldn't spain reclaim jibralter, as it is theirs. and the same goes for the republic of ireland
mdwf2007 3 years ago
what he said is very true.GALLOWAY is the man.ppl should read history befor the talk.and get the facts
313BOSTON 3 years ago
goerge galloway is wrong here kuwait was never part of Iraq. When kuwait was first was a country oil was not descovered in the land. after it was a full cillized country country the oil was descovered it was never stolen. And it was way more for them to steal any more.
castorino88 3 years ago
castorino88, Oil was first discovered in Kuwait in the 1930s and the government became more proactive in establishing internationally recognized boundaries. On June 19, 1961, Kuwait became fully independent.
Simple wiki research. Don't talk say "When kuwait was first was a country oil was not descovered in the land." It was a country created by greedy ppl and the British for wanting to deal in the oil.
sdfghjkl08 3 years ago
Kuwait is not part of Iraq nor does
it belong to Iraq
newnoo135 4 years ago
You are right, Kuwait is in the hands of the US.
moos07 4 years ago
Well, the whole Gulf is in the
hands of the US, not just Kuwait
newnoo135 4 years ago
except for a handfull of countries, you are right.
moos07 4 years ago
War was NOT the answer here. We could have "cut off" Saddam after the Kuwait invasion, there are so many other countries providing us oil.
Syphonaptera 4 years ago
Prt2: But , strangely....we started a war.I am not 100% sure but I believe Saddam was searching for "sponsors" all over the world, his land needed support(money) after the years of war against Iran, BUT(!), here comes the keypoint, The West refused this and only wanted to support Iraq with weapons. In a mindset so obvious Saddam must have thought that he could take the money by taking back Kuwait....and the outcome is known..:(
Syphonaptera 4 years ago
Saddam didn't want to repay his debts, that's why he went after quwait. The US is still responsible for saddam, with the help of the CIA he managed to become the dicatator he was.
moos07 4 years ago
No it does not. But the Arabs should get together and form a single nation (at least on the Eastern end of the Arab world). Their division is a cause of the US domination of the region.
poyani 4 years ago
goerge galloway is good man
elhoomi475 4 years ago
George Galloway is an asshole!!!
izy56 4 years ago
What documents? Are you talking about the documents reported by the Telegraph and the Christian Science Monitor which have repeatedly been proven to be forgeries?
nekokate 4 years ago
Kleptocracy, with a democratic veneer.
westphalianprinz 4 years ago
george galloway rocks!!!!
butcher1116 4 years ago 3
The history of Kuwait goes back to the year 1613 AD, long before the British empire, Mr Galloway is just sucking up to his Iraqi constituents. Need I remind you that he was talking about Edgware Rd. which might as well be in the middle of Baghdad.
kaa5007 4 years ago 2
The purpose of the current war in Iraq is different-- privatize all of Iraq's public capital and resources, using force. Bush and the neocons, and well the whole political class of the US, has mixed up privatization and democracy-- which is why they all loved Boris Yeltsin and hate Hugo Chavez. When Bush talks about democracy, he's really talking about neoliberalism and more privatization.
westphalianprinz 4 years ago 3
All that happened in 1991, is the brutal Saddam regime was removed from Kuwait, and the theocratic kleptocracy of Kuwait was restored.
westphalianprinz 4 years ago
Thank you Richard for your quick understanding, it clearly shows that you're not a warmonger and indeed you're a true British, unlike those who pretend to be on your side, using the " our Boys are doing a good job" while in fact all they do is killing people who did nothing to them, in the first place.
amino66 4 years ago