this is probably the first time that ive seen a judge judy case where both sides seem somewhat sane and not retarded. the breach of contract seems like an honest mistake that anyone could make
That's the first time I've seen her burst out into spontaneous laughter from a case. She's laughed before but it's usually forced. You can tell this is something new to her and she's nicer and more fun. I'm sure she does get bored with the other cases. This was fun.
At least the plaintiff took it in stride, he learned his lesson that after any verbal modification to the contract you must have them resign a new contract.
@mackles People only comment negatively about others to make themselves feel better. I hope you feel great, sitting in you bedroom, in front of your computer at your mom's house. Meanwhile, the defendant owns what is probably a multimillion dollar Victorian house in San Diego, Ca. Still feel good???
@bloomerdavid well yeah I guess I do, it's the internet so you'd have to be a tender little vagina to get your feewings hurt LOL and clearly by all the effort in that message, your little undies might have gotten a little ruffled
Ok so you're saying due to this clause the judge will automaticaly dissmiss any defendant breaking a lease because they think it's haunted. But I find it hard to believe that EVERYBODY is aware of this clause though. I understand it would be rare but I find it hard to believe that if a tennent sighn a lease then believes the place is haunted to the point where he or live there that NOBODY will ever claim that it is haunted in front of a judge. Maybe they just make up some other defence?
I worked for this tour during this lawsuit. These two friends just had a disagreement and brought it to a judge so that their friendship wouldn't dissolve. Chuck - the defendant - is a sweet heart is not worthy of the unkind remarks being made about his appearance. I was really disappointed with his house was dropped from the tour, it was one of my favorites!
I respect the freedom of speech on some people's personal judgements' on the physical appearance of the Defendant, so with that said, here's my freedom speech to those making those personal judgements calling him "ugly, frog-looking, down syndrom adjacent..." You are all heartless, pitiful excuse for a human beings for making outright hateful comments against a man trying to defend his case because he lost money in the breach contract. If you can't say something nice, don't say it all...respect
I ment to add in my other comment if somebody did claim they can't live in an apartment because they claimed it was haunted how would the U.S. court system handel that? Do judges believe in ghosts? Even if some do it would be awful hard to PROVE it was haunted.
@bandet888 Nope. There's a clause in judicial law regarding "spectral evidence" - testimony or evidence originating from sources not scientifically recognized, such as ghosts, psychics, or gods. Basically, since one cannot prove these things actually exist within the courtroom, this "spectral evidence" cannot be considered when making judgment, and is often stricken by objection.
@galathonredd In my other comment I left out a few words. I ment that if he or she finds the place to be haunted to the point where he or she could no longer live there and has to break the lease. By the way I'm not sure wheather ghosts exist or not myself.
u can tell the plaintiff wanted to bitchslap the defendant towards the end...not just give him a light pat on the shoulder. why the hell would he even touch the defendant? dumbass.
Hi, I am the plaintiff in this case David Nolan. First let me say that it is difficult to respond fully as you tube only allows you 489 letters in responses. But what you should know is No, I did not want to 'slap' Charles. He and I are actually friends.
Who I really wanted to slap was the production team of The Show! Even though Chuck and I both "benefitted" from appearing on TV, the EDITING of the actual taping depicts a different 'reality'. Thanks for watching though. David
Hi, I am the plaintiff in this case David Nolan. First let me say that it is difficult to respond fully as you tube only allows you 489 letters in responses. But what you should know is No, I did not want to 'slap' Charles. Far from it. He and I are actually friends. (Well... friendly anyway.)
By SIGNED CONTRACT I am unable to discuss the details of the case or TV show, but please realize that what you saw on TV is SHOW BUSINESS and not exactly the reality of the case.
@OfficerNelson I don't understand your comment. I don't know anything about contract law. Who said I did? Meeting J.J. was a Great Experience. I had never been on a TV program before so I would have No Way of knowing how the editing process works. But they did a good job. Thanks for watching.
did anyone notice that the plaintiff smiled and patted the defendant on the back in the end?? kinda wired.... but this is my favorite episode very interesting case.
wow I never knew the americans also used the term victorian! Learn something everyday on this show... I was more suprised by that than what she said about the laws of contract making!
OMg can someone explain this case to me?? i was paying close attention but that picture at 00:31 made me shit my pants and i couldnt concentrate or focus im still creeped out
@senteno25 the best "top comments" actually come from people that don't have to get their self-esteem enema by asking for people's votes. just my opinion. like if you agree!
Thanks JJ, for sharing how special the variety of your show sends joy bubbles up your vaginal canal and into out hearts! You just know when Judge Judy sticks her cranky vagina into the mix, hilarity ensues!
Love JJ, but she was wrong when she said people intrested in the Occult, Ghosts have nothing to do with ghosts and spirits from the other side, there are many christian mediums who do ghost tours ect, however i'm a pagan and very intrested in the spirit world.
The suit was right about subsequent oral agreements. The parol evidence rule (the "four corners" rule she's explaining rather inelegantly) is only a bar to prior or contemporaneous oral agreements -- not subsequent ones. Subsequent oral agreements can modify the terms of a contract.
@opcond123 You are correct, but usually as in this case a subsequent oral agreement will boil down to one persons word against the others in a lawsuit. If you have a written contract it's a simple thing to modify it and if you don't (especially in Judy's court) you are going to lose.
@kcaj123456 Dude, thanks for your incredible perspicacity, but I have a right to my opinion. I am so grateful you took such a lively interest in my opinion and thank you so much for that. now have a nice day and a great life. Adieu.
@KGCJR1 LMAO LOVE IT! I absolutely love that you know the Phantasm magic!!! Every time I think of those little buggers, I think of the, I believe, second installment when the girl clobbers the one then says, "Sorry, Gramma!" LOL
In England it is possible to amend a written contract with things said afterwards. The rule JJ is talking about is called the parol evidence rule, and is becoming less strict as time goes by. The Law Commission in the UK has called for complete abolishment of it since the 1980's. Just thought you might like to know :)
We don't know all the details, but it seems she applied PER incorrectly. It doesn't bar oral modifications after formation unless the agreement has a clause to that effect. It's designed to keep out terms the parties discarded at the negotiation stage, not exclude evidence of subsequent agreements. She probably just let it go because proving oral agreements after the fact is so hard, but she is wrong deeming oral mods inadmissible. They're fine in the US, but the PER still has bite.
@bludika No they aren't friends. The plaintiff was pissed at the end and he puts his hand on him to try to aggravate the defendant, he wanted to hit him.
@pianor91 Yes, it might also come as a surprise to you that we have evolved since leaving our original homeland and now are almost up to your level! We not only know the term Victorian, we have many splendid examples of that wonderful architecture. Try doing some research before you make snarky, snide uneducated comments.
@skylur44 I think before writing you should have read. There was nothing offensive in what I said nor did not contain the intention to do so. I merely remarked that I am surprised that Americans refer to that period of history as Victorian, because she was our monarch (I hope you know where the term Victorian comes from!) and America was independent from us at that time. I think your post is a case of the pot calling the kettle black...
@pianor91 I did read, O Great Oracle. You need to get over yourself. And yes, it was offensive, you are so full of hubris you cannot even see how rude you are. Regardless of the fact Victoria was YOUR monach, the info re her and her reign actually traveled all the way across the pond, hence our knowledge of YOUR monarch. Get your hear out of your ass and understand you know NOTHING. What an arrogant POS jerkoff you are!
@SpahnRanch1969 I'm fine; just thinking about you the other day re a program about Sharon Tate. The person who uploaded it took issue with me feeling a wee bit mroe sympathetic to her, I tried to explain that had to do with the fact she was 8 months pregnant and wanted the baby so badly, and if she couldn't live, to let the baby live. Oh well, maybe that's wrong, of course all the deaths were horrific, but I did feel bad she knew the baby was going to die too.
@SpahnRanch1969 I totally agree, and there was all that hue and cry when they wanted to release SUsan Atkins when she ws so ill, she still had an easier death than any of them. Manson will die of old age peacefully in his bed, we can only hope he finds his justice in the next life. But for the Supreme Court rescinding the death penalty, all of them would be six feet under.
@skylur44 What he wrote was very obviously not intended to be offensive. His surprise at the term "Victorian" being adopted by Americans is quite understandable, since Americans are the only non-Commonwealth people to do so. After all, the same is not true about other styles. He even explained himself afterwards, but you chose to ignore that, and just kept flaming him.
The fact that your mind interpreted it in an offensive way reveals more about your bitter character than about his intentions.
@Timrath What he wrote was obviously very much intended to be as offensive as possible. He was rude and sarcastic and arrogant, and I responded accordingly. If you take issue with what I stated, oh well too bad so sad. But thank you so much for the knee jerk pseudo psychological comments on my motives and persona. I am deeply indebted to you.
@skylur44 See what I mean? You are short-tempered, aggressive and easily provoked.
I was tempted to post here the perverse, disgusting PM that you sent me, so that everyone could see what a sick person you are. But then you would just claim that I made it up.
You disgust me. I'm blocking your account now, so I won't have to read a single more line from you. Go see a therapist.
When the plaintiff slapped the defendant on the back afterwards, I wondered whether they hadn't concocted the whole thing to get publicity for their two businesses.
@greymolly2 Nah. . .that wasn't concocted. .JJ would have found that out quickly. Now. . .if you want concoctions, take a look at JJ and the toilet seat. Now, that is definitely made up.
was the defendant real or the chaz bono exhibition at one of those haunted houses? and it's a shame that the plaintiff couldn't take judy's compliments and obvious pleasure, left it at that, and exited like a mensch.
This may be the first Judge Judy case I've ever seen where both the plaintiff and defendant seemed intelligent.
chthonic19 16 hours ago
this is probably the first time that ive seen a judge judy case where both sides seem somewhat sane and not retarded. the breach of contract seems like an honest mistake that anyone could make
superdruid999 4 days ago 2
Nice to see Simon Western Still gets TV work
dilwich123 2 weeks ago
That's the first time I've seen her burst out into spontaneous laughter from a case. She's laughed before but it's usually forced. You can tell this is something new to her and she's nicer and more fun. I'm sure she does get bored with the other cases. This was fun.
2agray 2 weeks ago
How coould be her job be a boring one ? $45M per year
Gedankenbaukunst 1 month ago
It's cool when the judge enjoys a case.
PuritanReader 1 month ago 3
You Divvy. The producers pay, not the loser. Thats why they go on the show. LOLS at you.
bazfanv2 1 month ago
"Claims his guests were scared."
LOL!
presstrigga 2 months ago
If i lived in the USA i would get a friend to sue me for the 5k then split it 50/50 afterwards. I wonder if this has been done before?.
bazfanv2 2 months ago
@bazfanv2 Well, considering it would be -you- who's paying the 5k, you're better off handing your friend 2.5k and calling it good. Lol.
Satoascorpion 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Satoascorpion You Divvy. The producers pay, not the loser. Thats why they go on the show. LOLS at you.
bazfanv2 1 month ago
Comment removed
Gedankenbaukunst 1 month ago
Defendant looks like the McDonald's very own, Grimace.
triplei12 2 months ago
Defendant kinda looks like a ghost. lol
triplei12 2 months ago
At least the plaintiff took it in stride, he learned his lesson that after any verbal modification to the contract you must have them resign a new contract.
DivideofNations 2 months ago
That P is a fool
musicluvr708 2 months ago
the defendant looked like a cockroach except in a human form
deadsailors 3 months ago 4
@deadsailors Bahahaha!
gabbis 3 months ago
agreed, This should be shown to law students, it's as basic, lamen, simple as you can get.
whatevers written in the 4 corners of a piece of paper, thats the rules, thats it.
RandomLevitation 3 months ago
I think the defendant looks rather unwell. I wish him well.
Buondelmonte123 3 months ago
Defendant looks like opie from family guy
mackles 3 months ago
@mackles People only comment negatively about others to make themselves feel better. I hope you feel great, sitting in you bedroom, in front of your computer at your mom's house. Meanwhile, the defendant owns what is probably a multimillion dollar Victorian house in San Diego, Ca. Still feel good???
bloomerdavid 1 month ago
@bloomerdavid well yeah I guess I do, it's the internet so you'd have to be a tender little vagina to get your feewings hurt LOL and clearly by all the effort in that message, your little undies might have gotten a little ruffled
mackles 1 month ago
@mackles Jesus you must really hate vaginas
OonaCanute 1 month ago
Ok so you're saying due to this clause the judge will automaticaly dissmiss any defendant breaking a lease because they think it's haunted. But I find it hard to believe that EVERYBODY is aware of this clause though. I understand it would be rare but I find it hard to believe that if a tennent sighn a lease then believes the place is haunted to the point where he or live there that NOBODY will ever claim that it is haunted in front of a judge. Maybe they just make up some other defence?
bandet888 4 months ago
I worked for this tour during this lawsuit. These two friends just had a disagreement and brought it to a judge so that their friendship wouldn't dissolve. Chuck - the defendant - is a sweet heart is not worthy of the unkind remarks being made about his appearance. I was really disappointed with his house was dropped from the tour, it was one of my favorites!
sddweller 5 months ago 18
I respect the freedom of speech on some people's personal judgements' on the physical appearance of the Defendant, so with that said, here's my freedom speech to those making those personal judgements calling him "ugly, frog-looking, down syndrom adjacent..." You are all heartless, pitiful excuse for a human beings for making outright hateful comments against a man trying to defend his case because he lost money in the breach contract. If you can't say something nice, don't say it all...respect
jusitke07 5 months ago 3
You notice the guy in the white shirt looks like a fucking frog, he has no neck at all. Lmao.
AstrophelTDeath 5 months ago
@AstrophelTDeath lmfao so blunt
CaseIH232 4 months ago
@CaseIH232 Thanks I didn't realize until now how blunt it was, it was just the first thing i noticed about the guy. You have to agree with me. Lol.
AstrophelTDeath 4 months ago
I'll visit one of these homes next time I'm in San Diego!
cajayson8301 5 months ago
Publicity stunt ha
mickeyagrawal2001 6 months ago
I ment to add in my other comment if somebody did claim they can't live in an apartment because they claimed it was haunted how would the U.S. court system handel that? Do judges believe in ghosts? Even if some do it would be awful hard to PROVE it was haunted.
bandet888 6 months ago
@bandet888 Nope. There's a clause in judicial law regarding "spectral evidence" - testimony or evidence originating from sources not scientifically recognized, such as ghosts, psychics, or gods. Basically, since one cannot prove these things actually exist within the courtroom, this "spectral evidence" cannot be considered when making judgment, and is often stricken by objection.
galathonredd 4 months ago
@galathonredd In my other comment I left out a few words. I ment that if he or she finds the place to be haunted to the point where he or she could no longer live there and has to break the lease. By the way I'm not sure wheather ghosts exist or not myself.
bandet888 4 months ago
I wonder if there ever was a case on TV on ANY court show that a defenent broke a lease on an apartment because he or she claimed it was haunted?
bandet888 6 months ago
u can tell the plaintiff wanted to bitchslap the defendant towards the end...not just give him a light pat on the shoulder. why the hell would he even touch the defendant? dumbass.
theflygal11 6 months ago
@theflygal11
Hi, I am the plaintiff in this case David Nolan. First let me say that it is difficult to respond fully as you tube only allows you 489 letters in responses. But what you should know is No, I did not want to 'slap' Charles. He and I are actually friends.
Who I really wanted to slap was the production team of The Show! Even though Chuck and I both "benefitted" from appearing on TV, the EDITING of the actual taping depicts a different 'reality'. Thanks for watching though. David
dhsduran 3 months ago 2
@theflygal11
Hi, I am the plaintiff in this case David Nolan. First let me say that it is difficult to respond fully as you tube only allows you 489 letters in responses. But what you should know is No, I did not want to 'slap' Charles. Far from it. He and I are actually friends. (Well... friendly anyway.)
By SIGNED CONTRACT I am unable to discuss the details of the case or TV show, but please realize that what you saw on TV is SHOW BUSINESS and not exactly the reality of the case.
dhsduran 3 months ago
@dhsduran lol dude u look and sound like a faggot
AfricanPubes69 2 months ago
@dhsduran Knowing so much about contract law, you should have been aware that a TV show would edit the content substantially.
OfficerNelson 2 months ago
@OfficerNelson I don't understand your comment. I don't know anything about contract law. Who said I did? Meeting J.J. was a Great Experience. I had never been on a TV program before so I would have No Way of knowing how the editing process works. But they did a good job. Thanks for watching.
sandiegoduran 2 months ago
Fat guy looks Down-Syndrom adjacent.
DanandDonna1 6 months ago
Love how the plaintiff actually made a friendly gesture to the defendant at the end - it was like "no hard feelings!" XD
Interesting case indeed. It was also good to see that even though Judge Judy dismissed the case, she was still (relatively) nice about it.
Jianlibao 6 months ago
I'd be creeped out by that hotel owner, he looks like an aborted foetus.
ArwenPendragon 7 months ago
Fat man looks like a fish!
matthias19850 7 months ago 2
@matthias19850 hahahah ...like a freakin' trout!!
Lywnis 7 months ago
@idontthinkhesawus No please explain your like perfect your all knowing every Sunday everyone should sit around you all day
PHXJersey 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:30 what the fuck
rockerduff1231 7 months ago
Comment removed
rockerduff1231 7 months ago
how do ugly dudes get hot chicks? all hot chicks are stupid?
themooddisorders 7 months ago
@themooddisorders No, they have money.
ChiefOren 7 months ago
Anyone studying law could benefit from watching this episode. Contract law 101.
xtrabass 8 months ago
53,000 viewer ...... CHEA
DJABKID 8 months ago
Looks like paul blart wins
natetechrock 8 months ago
judge judy is chuck norris long lost sister
david56341 8 months ago 3
Chuck looks like a pointy dart that looks like a tadpole.
MyMIXmedia 8 months ago
She explained some of the basics of contract law very well.
k3n0ju 8 months ago 30
The Defendant looks stoned
bluestingerborg 8 months ago
This is the nicest I have seen JJ be
gonzalezfrank626 9 months ago
Ghosts are NOT that pale. D: Geez. Get it right. lol
mollymoe429 9 months ago 2
Chuck Thompson is one freaky looking dude!
orovadaman 9 months ago
Bugs are going to burst out of that thing anytime now.
realkman666 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't touch me.
Eiraqucam 9 months ago
I'm creeped out just looking at the defendant.
youpumpertube 9 months ago
@youpumpertube He looks like someone who eat's 24/7
bluestingerborg 8 months ago
Defendant looks like the creepy guy from Office Space with the coke bottle glasses and the red stapler.
deeno 9 months ago 3
the defendant is freaking me out...
rockeer 9 months ago
did anyone notice that the plaintiff smiled and patted the defendant on the back in the end?? kinda wired.... but this is my favorite episode very interesting case.
blazeit19 10 months ago
@blazeit19 ahahha ya the end, he sues the guy then pats him on the back, the guy is like fuck off me
LeBronForTheWin 10 months ago
Judy was either slightly smitten by or had natural sympathy for the man with facial hair.
joroma77 10 months ago
They made JJ's day =) SOMETHING NEW!!! HOORAY!!!
Eyeglompyou 10 months ago
great JJ case! :)
LegendofBen 10 months ago
@Mark737408 Thanks!!
senteno25 10 months ago
the spookiest thing is her smile...it scares the living crap out of me!
rentorules 10 months ago
@rentorules So true lol..I have never seen that b4
jamaicarussa 9 months ago
wow I never knew the americans also used the term victorian! Learn something everyday on this show... I was more suprised by that than what she said about the laws of contract making!
atomicnortherner 10 months ago
2:02
"E-excuse me, I believe you have mah stapler."
TheDukeofMania 10 months ago 19
@TheDukeofMania AHAHAHAHAHA havent laughed on youtube this hard in a while, classic Office Space
LeBronForTheWin 10 months ago
THAT GUY LOOKS LIKE A PUG NOSED DOG
Maneater1984 10 months ago
Haunted Ghost Tours? I already smell a pile of bullshit from the title. Give the plaintiff his money immediately no questions asked.
GSgtHartman101 10 months ago
OMg can someone explain this case to me?? i was paying close attention but that picture at 00:31 made me shit my pants and i couldnt concentrate or focus im still creeped out
MeGaBeRry123 10 months ago
Whats the deal with the defendants shirt collar?
pjaylett 11 months ago
I wish the girl at 00:31 was the one in court.
05005051 11 months ago
@05005051
LMAO!!!
MeGaBeRry123 10 months ago
If there's afterlife, when I die and face my final judgement, I want Judge Judy to judge me. lol
doomsdaymonster7 11 months ago
Lol this is way too much ROTFL
travelplus1 11 months ago
Excellent! Great case, great story, great ending. Thumbs up!
NLBanditNL 1 year ago
JJ paid him all kinds of compliments and he just didn't know when to shut up. He should have just sucked it up when he lost and smiled.
beaubrent 1 year ago
Judge Judy for President 2012! Like if you agree!
senteno25 1 year ago 242
@senteno25 Dont you understand shes too old?
globe255 9 months ago
@senteno25 the best "top comments" actually come from people that don't have to get their self-esteem enema by asking for people's votes. just my opinion. like if you agree!
yummymayo 9 months ago
@yummymayo Like!!
senteno25 9 months ago
@senteno25 If you weren't an ignorant couch potato you'd probably say otherwise. :)
JustStayDown90 9 months ago
@senteno25 Maybe Ron Paul's Vice would be ok. HAHA would love to see her take on congress and the buracuracy of DC.
collo121 8 months ago
@senteno25
myloveispuke 8 months ago
@senteno25 she has said herself that she does not like politics and wouldn't do it
ripcitiboi 7 months ago
@senteno25 I'm gonna go on a limb here and assume she'll be running as a Republican....
nitramletnan 7 months ago
@senteno25 172 morons agree with you ;) not a thing to be proud of ,my frined ;))) (just kidding)
Lywnis 7 months ago
@senteno25 she would never win with such popular people like donald trump running xD
fuckuyawanker 7 months ago
@fuckuyawanker Please the government would never allow Donald Trump to enter the White House .....
SuperGinger82 6 months ago
The defendant has weird eyes.
bhstone1 1 year ago
Is it me or does the defendant not have a neck?
PhatChick722 1 year ago
@PhatChick722 LMFAO
idreeshiphop 1 year ago
@PhatChick722 no, it is just you and the defendant.
pkdL0422 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pkdL0422
* no, it is just you and the defendant.*
That's your fucking comeback?
That I don't have a neck?
LMAO!!!
PhatChick722 11 months ago
@PhatChick722
its you ha ha
LemmingdeMerciless 8 months ago
interlacing ..............................
potat3o 1 year ago
lol "byeee" *walks out*
keystar123458 1 year ago
The Plaintiff should've just created an "Adams Family" freak show and hired the defendant to play the role of Pugsly. His look is uncanny!
JPAnnunziato 1 year ago
Thanks JJ, for sharing how special the variety of your show sends joy bubbles up your vaginal canal and into out hearts! You just know when Judge Judy sticks her cranky vagina into the mix, hilarity ensues!
JelloFarming 1 year ago
one of the guys looks like John Wayne Gacy :(
ReCkLeSsErr0r 1 year ago
Love JJ, but she was wrong when she said people intrested in the Occult, Ghosts have nothing to do with ghosts and spirits from the other side, there are many christian mediums who do ghost tours ect, however i'm a pagan and very intrested in the spirit world.
as they said every person has a shoe to fit.....
moonwitch1981 1 year ago
No, I think he looks like that creature that the brother got turned into in the movie weird science.
popeye152 1 year ago
Hehe, Her Honor can look forward to new things at her age =D
Eyeglompyou 1 year ago
The suit was right about subsequent oral agreements. The parol evidence rule (the "four corners" rule she's explaining rather inelegantly) is only a bar to prior or contemporaneous oral agreements -- not subsequent ones. Subsequent oral agreements can modify the terms of a contract.
opcond123 1 year ago
@opcond123 You are correct, but usually as in this case a subsequent oral agreement will boil down to one persons word against the others in a lawsuit. If you have a written contract it's a simple thing to modify it and if you don't (especially in Judy's court) you are going to lose.
lawnsausages 1 year ago
Wow. They got a new tv. Byrd must be pumped!
theextrastrength 1 year ago
What the fuck? The defendant looks like PUGSLY from the Adams family!!!
wontinga 1 year ago
Look at the comment debate below. These guys totally want each other.
SeethingGreen 1 year ago
Some of the comments on this page are...bizarre. Is everyone here high on something?
TreyParkersBitch 1 year ago
@TreyParkersBitch It's Youtube..of course they are.
TheKogunEnjou 1 year ago
@TreyParkersBitch skylur44 needs to be on something....reminds me of someone who used to flame people on the Guido Fawkes blog. So utterly miserable.
MinnieMouse1975 10 months ago
Judge Judy is Satan's Grandma.
JelloFarming 1 year ago
wtf.. rite at the end he puts hes hand on the other guys shoulder as if they're still mates :S
donnellyadam14 1 year ago
@donnellyadam14 That is why they call is civil court.
101southsideboy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kcaj123456 Oh honey, I don't have to try...now run along like a good little boy.
skylur44 1 year ago
@kcaj123456 "Snarky?" Moi? surely you jest! Now run along and stop trying to be clever, trust me, you'll never make the cut.
skylur44 1 year ago
@kcaj123456 Dude, thanks for your incredible perspicacity, but I have a right to my opinion. I am so grateful you took such a lively interest in my opinion and thank you so much for that. now have a nice day and a great life. Adieu.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 lmao ...you can't get along with anyone, can you? ^_^
*ducks for cover*
krumbleton 1 year ago
@krumbleton Au contraire; I get along with most poeple but I do not suffer fools gladly.
skylur44 1 year ago
defendant must be wearing a wig.
masambulla 1 year ago
d looks like one of those midgit creatures from the old phantasm movie
KGCJR1 1 year ago 6
@KGCJR1 LMAO LOVE IT! I absolutely love that you know the Phantasm magic!!! Every time I think of those little buggers, I think of the, I believe, second installment when the girl clobbers the one then says, "Sorry, Gramma!" LOL
BelfastBailey 1 year ago
@KGCJR1
LOL - exactly. hehe....
gilkich 1 year ago
john astin and al lewis should have been witnesses
dodge96neon 1 year ago
Bye!
tking46 1 year ago
Great quality<3
JosKiddin 1 year ago
I'm so glad to see the defendant win. The plantiff thought he could sway his way with eloquent speech patterns and mannerisms with JJ.
Sorry silver spoon fed monsieur, you lost to someone that was just a normal Joe, like me.
Thank you, JJ, for making this imbecile look foolish on national TV.,
tallen87 1 year ago
the defendant has a blinking problem...lmao!
XxDELIVERENCExX 1 year ago
The defendant looks like the pigs from Angry Birds
turdburglar316 1 year ago 2
he looks like an unburnt simon weston.....
RobbieTyler1 1 year ago
good to see Judge Judy laugh =P
antionidept 1 year ago 2
The defendant could HAUNT a fucking house. Creepy-looking dude!
SpahnRanch1969 1 year ago
In England it is possible to amend a written contract with things said afterwards. The rule JJ is talking about is called the parol evidence rule, and is becoming less strict as time goes by. The Law Commission in the UK has called for complete abolishment of it since the 1980's. Just thought you might like to know :)
mikeycftw 1 year ago
@mikeycftw
We don't know all the details, but it seems she applied PER incorrectly. It doesn't bar oral modifications after formation unless the agreement has a clause to that effect. It's designed to keep out terms the parties discarded at the negotiation stage, not exclude evidence of subsequent agreements. She probably just let it go because proving oral agreements after the fact is so hard, but she is wrong deeming oral mods inadmissible. They're fine in the US, but the PER still has bite.
acstas87 11 months ago
@carl22069 yeah i surely enjoyed seeing JJ with a "mad hatter" smile, stretched from ear to ear!xD
qualqui 1 year ago
Lol Yeaha they look like good friends, why sue? I'm thinking this is fake
bludika 1 year ago
@bludika No they aren't friends. The plaintiff was pissed at the end and he puts his hand on him to try to aggravate the defendant, he wanted to hit him.
CrackHeadForLife420 1 year ago
I think both these guys are good.
ramio1983 1 year ago 2
"Victorian home..." I'm surprised Americans recognise that time as Victorian; I thought it was just we Brits.
pianor91 1 year ago
@pianor91 Not all Americans are retarded.
thaddeusj 1 year ago 2
@pianor91 ugh, you just had to be British.
inturn23 1 year ago 3
@inturn23 racist
RobbieTyler1 1 year ago
@pianor91 Yes, it might also come as a surprise to you that we have evolved since leaving our original homeland and now are almost up to your level! We not only know the term Victorian, we have many splendid examples of that wonderful architecture. Try doing some research before you make snarky, snide uneducated comments.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 I think before writing you should have read. There was nothing offensive in what I said nor did not contain the intention to do so. I merely remarked that I am surprised that Americans refer to that period of history as Victorian, because she was our monarch (I hope you know where the term Victorian comes from!) and America was independent from us at that time. I think your post is a case of the pot calling the kettle black...
pianor91 1 year ago
@pianor91 I did read, O Great Oracle. You need to get over yourself. And yes, it was offensive, you are so full of hubris you cannot even see how rude you are. Regardless of the fact Victoria was YOUR monach, the info re her and her reign actually traveled all the way across the pond, hence our knowledge of YOUR monarch. Get your hear out of your ass and understand you know NOTHING. What an arrogant POS jerkoff you are!
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 Hello, skylur44! Long time, no see! How are you?
SpahnRanch1969 1 year ago
@SpahnRanch1969 I'm fine; just thinking about you the other day re a program about Sharon Tate. The person who uploaded it took issue with me feeling a wee bit mroe sympathetic to her, I tried to explain that had to do with the fact she was 8 months pregnant and wanted the baby so badly, and if she couldn't live, to let the baby live. Oh well, maybe that's wrong, of course all the deaths were horrific, but I did feel bad she knew the baby was going to die too.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 Yeah, no doubt, man. Too true. What kills me is Manson just celebrated his 76th birthday. He should've been dead 35 years ago.
SpahnRanch1969 1 year ago
@SpahnRanch1969 I totally agree, and there was all that hue and cry when they wanted to release SUsan Atkins when she ws so ill, she still had an easier death than any of them. Manson will die of old age peacefully in his bed, we can only hope he finds his justice in the next life. But for the Supreme Court rescinding the death penalty, all of them would be six feet under.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 What he wrote was very obviously not intended to be offensive. His surprise at the term "Victorian" being adopted by Americans is quite understandable, since Americans are the only non-Commonwealth people to do so. After all, the same is not true about other styles. He even explained himself afterwards, but you chose to ignore that, and just kept flaming him.
The fact that your mind interpreted it in an offensive way reveals more about your bitter character than about his intentions.
Timrath 1 year ago 27
@Timrath What he wrote was obviously very much intended to be as offensive as possible. He was rude and sarcastic and arrogant, and I responded accordingly. If you take issue with what I stated, oh well too bad so sad. But thank you so much for the knee jerk pseudo psychological comments on my motives and persona. I am deeply indebted to you.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 See what I mean? You are short-tempered, aggressive and easily provoked.
I was tempted to post here the perverse, disgusting PM that you sent me, so that everyone could see what a sick person you are. But then you would just claim that I made it up.
You disgust me. I'm blocking your account now, so I won't have to read a single more line from you. Go see a therapist.
Timrath 1 year ago 4
@Timrath You did make it up...now run along and get undisgusted. What a pity idiots like you clog up youtube.
skylur44 1 year ago
@pianor91 the term 'Victorian' used in this case refers to the style of the building not the actual period in history
madabbafan 10 months ago
When the plaintiff slapped the defendant on the back afterwards, I wondered whether they hadn't concocted the whole thing to get publicity for their two businesses.
greymolly2 1 year ago
@greymolly2 probably
darkbreeze9009 1 year ago
@greymolly2 Nah. . .that wasn't concocted. .JJ would have found that out quickly. Now. . .if you want concoctions, take a look at JJ and the toilet seat. Now, that is definitely made up.
tallen87 1 year ago
was the defendant real or the chaz bono exhibition at one of those haunted houses? and it's a shame that the plaintiff couldn't take judy's compliments and obvious pleasure, left it at that, and exited like a mensch.
jimmysudar 1 year ago
with great moustache comes great responsibility!
train612 1 year ago