Fight to stop HAARP from heating and terraforming the world with chemtrails and scalar waves and then blaming the climate change it on carbon dioxide so they can get a carbon tax paid directly into the coffers of the oil companies that push for it behind the scenes while pretending to oppose it so naive environmentalists get behind it and consequently work for your own country's destruction and policies that have already caused millions of children to starve to death.
What about EISCAT? What about Sura (SIHF)? Who was responsible for starving millions of children to death before any of these facilities entered operational state? Perhaps you should rethink your ad hoc hypothesis.
GLOBAL WARMING COULD EXPLAIN WHY NORTHEAST IS SEEING MORE, AND FIERCER RAINSTORMS
The Northeast is seeing more frequent "extreme precipitation events" in line with global warming predictions, a study shows, including storms like the recent fierce rains whose floodwaters swallowed neighborhoods and businesses across New England
NCAR: Scientists can't measure all heat trapped on Earth
Half of the energy captured by greenhouse gases isn't accounted for
About half of the total amount of heat entering the atmosphere is unaccounted for, according a study in Science that suggests the oceans are absorbing energy that will haunt us sooner or later.
Oh here we go again. Another overblown story on global warming
But wait.
Whats this?
Paragraph 5: The parks glaciers have been slowly melting away since about 1850, when the centuries-long Little Ice Age ended. They once numbered as many as 150, and 37 of those glaciers eventually were named.
Hmm.
That means the glaciers at Glacier National Park were melting for 60 years before the park was founded in 1910.
Scientists call for better way to do climate report; errors tarnish Nobel Prize-winning effort
A steady drip of unsettling errors is exposing what scientists are calling the weaker link in reports on global warming
The flaws — &the erosion they've caused in public confidence — have some scientists calling for drastic changes in how future UN climate reports are done. A push for reform comes on top of a growing clamor for the resignation of the chairman (Choo Choo Charlie)of the IPCC
With the oceans absorbing more than 1 million tons of carbon dioxide an hour, a National Research Council study released Thursday found that the level of acid in the oceans is increasing at an unprecedented rate and threatening to change marine ecosystems.
SCIENTISTS INVESTIGATE ECUADORS RECEDING GLACIERS Andean glaciers are losing volume at an unprecedented rate, with some declining by 40% over the past 50 years. At more than 5,000m (16,400ft) high, tropical glaciers are particularly sensitive to a changing climate. BBC
Contrary to earthquakes, natural disasters, like storms and floods, are caused by movements in the atmosphere. Climate change is making such disasters more likely, says Peter Höppe, director of geo risk research at Munich Re.
The UN's climate science body has admitted that a claim made in its 2007 report - that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035 - was unfounded.
The admission followed a New Scientist article that revealed the source of the claim made in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was not peer-reviewed scientific literature but a media interview with a scientist conducted in 1999
Glacier scientist: I knew Data Hadnt Been Verified
The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.
Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.
Doug Benn is a glaciological LEGEND anyone who's studied a bit of glaciology would realise he knows what he's talking about. Im tired of these self indulging "sceptics" who know jack shit about the science of climate change. I find theyre often driven by some pseudo-cynical idea that scientists are just out to "absorb money" or something equally retarded and paranoid. How would these sceptics ever be able to tell us whether to believe in climate change when they not qualified to recognise it?
That is the normal process, glaciers melt at the bottom. In some years they melt more than in other years. The glaciers have been getting shorter for 200 years, since the end of the Little Ice Age.
Why not show the top of the glacier where it is growing ?
Everything is a "normal", natural process. Thats not the question. The question is whether the pace (of melting) was stable, whether there was a period of growing and how intense it was, etc. The core samples show us that there is more melting than growing and that the melting has been accelerating. The question is whether human activity (a natural process) is a causally related factor and to what extent.
On average the Ngozumpa seems to be losing mass. Check it out in relevant literature.
Natural factors like what? Anthropogenic activites are a natural factor too and those seem to be the best candidate...
Neither did the temperature decrease and Suns minimum is about to end. Meanwhile runnerup countries are massively industrializing and the emissions are growing too. Gives one really to think.
Dont know what you exactly mean. Indeed if glaciers are gone then there wont be anything to melt. Yet if they just keep melting, they can keep melting for a couple of hundred years.
I dont hear there much alarmism at all. What did the scientist say at 2:55? Listen again.
We, the humans, are one of the natural factors. And currently there is no other one that would be as suited as our activities.
In 200 years hopefully we will have mastered some technology that will bring us forward and we wont rely on fossil fuels and other even much more dangerous substances like trifluoromethane which is potentially up to 15,000 times more efficient at trapping heat than carbon.
"the Indian government published a discussion paper that pointed out that there was in fact no sign of any "abnormal" retreat in the Himalayan glaciers. India's environment minister Jairam Ramesh accused the IPCC of being "alarmist.""
LOL... And this shyte what we see here is "normal"? Erm... No... You are mixing apples with pears and thats the key problem here.
Again, I dont relate to any IPCC assessments. Yet you are attacking those. Thats a classical straw man issue.
If I remember well, the "alarmist claim" was about Himalayan glaciers melting in the comming 30-40 years. Obviously this is not the claim here, hence your straw man. Sums it up nicely...
What errors? Dont you believe your own eyes? Dont you see the decrepit glacier? Obviously theres a difference of one magnitude if someone claims those (glaciers) will disappear in the coming 30 years and in contrast PRJ studies suggesting in the coming 300 years... Yet even if the glaciers are expected to disappear in the nex 300 years, the pace of melting is much faster than "naturally" (aka without human activities) would occur.
Its ironic that this was posted in the same week that the IPCC was forced to admit that its report on Himalayan ice melting had not foundation in science. Its own predictions are that it will be there for at least another 300 years. So this story is complete nonsense.
Fight to stop HAARP from heating and terraforming the world with chemtrails and scalar waves and then blaming the climate change it on carbon dioxide so they can get a carbon tax paid directly into the coffers of the oil companies that push for it behind the scenes while pretending to oppose it so naive environmentalists get behind it and consequently work for your own country's destruction and policies that have already caused millions of children to starve to death.
pennilesshippo 1 year ago
@pennilesshippo
What about EISCAT? What about Sura (SIHF)? Who was responsible for starving millions of children to death before any of these facilities entered operational state? Perhaps you should rethink your ad hoc hypothesis.
terroil 1 year ago
More impacts of climate change in the news
GLOBAL WARMING COULD EXPLAIN WHY NORTHEAST IS SEEING MORE, AND FIERCER RAINSTORMS
The Northeast is seeing more frequent "extreme precipitation events" in line with global warming predictions, a study shows, including storms like the recent fierce rains whose floodwaters swallowed neighborhoods and businesses across New England
ASSOCIATED PRESS
APRIL 6, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Climate science news
NCAR: Scientists can't measure all heat trapped on Earth
Half of the energy captured by greenhouse gases isn't accounted for
About half of the total amount of heat entering the atmosphere is unaccounted for, according a study in Science that suggests the oceans are absorbing energy that will haunt us sooner or later.
BOULDER DAILY CAMERA
COLORADO
By Sarah Horn For the Camera
Posted: 04/15/2010 06:18:49 PM MDT
Nightversionn 1 year ago
AP gets glacier melt right
Oh here we go again. Another overblown story on global warming
But wait.
Whats this?
Paragraph 5: The parks glaciers have been slowly melting away since about 1850, when the centuries-long Little Ice Age ended. They once numbered as many as 150, and 37 of those glaciers eventually were named.
Hmm.
That means the glaciers at Glacier National Park were melting for 60 years before the park was founded in 1910.
CLIMATECHANGEFRAUD(dot)com
Thisawareness 1 year ago
Scientists call for better way to do climate report; errors tarnish Nobel Prize-winning effort
A steady drip of unsettling errors is exposing what scientists are calling the weaker link in reports on global warming
The flaws — &the erosion they've caused in public confidence — have some scientists calling for drastic changes in how future UN climate reports are done. A push for reform comes on top of a growing clamor for the resignation of the chairman (Choo Choo Charlie)of the IPCC
Thisawareness 1 year ago
Breaking impacts of climate change in the news
OCEAN ACIDIFICATION RISING AT UNPRECEDENTED RATE
With the oceans absorbing more than 1 million tons of carbon dioxide an hour, a National Research Council study released Thursday found that the level of acid in the oceans is increasing at an unprecedented rate and threatening to change marine ecosystems.
MCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS
April 23, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Breaking climate news
SCIENTISTS INVESTIGATE ECUADORS RECEDING GLACIERS Andean glaciers are losing volume at an unprecedented rate, with some declining by 40% over the past 50 years. At more than 5,000m (16,400ft) high, tropical glaciers are particularly sensitive to a changing climate. BBC
25 April 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Climate change chief says sorry for hot air claim over melting glaciers
By David Derbyshire
Last updated at 10:21 AM on 22nd January 2010
After a global outcry, Dr Rajendra Pachauri - chairman of the IPCC - has issued an unprecedented apology.
dailymai(.)co(.)uk/news/articl e-1245161/Climate-change-chief -says-sorry-hot-air-claim-melt ing-glaciers(.)html#ixzz0dLXw1 aeR
Choo Choo Charlie apologizes, thats golden
Thisawareness 1 year ago
@Thisawareness
Looks like you are unwilling to retreat from your position of irrelevance. Thats pretty fascinating, indeed.
terroil 1 year ago
Breaking climate change news..
Climate change increasing disasters in China
Contrary to earthquakes, natural disasters, like storms and floods, are caused by movements in the atmosphere. Climate change is making such disasters more likely, says Peter Höppe, director of geo risk research at Munich Re.
DEUSTCHE WELLE
GERMANY April 26, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Sorry Marxist warm-mongers
The UN's climate science body has admitted that a claim made in its 2007 report - that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035 - was unfounded.
The admission followed a New Scientist article that revealed the source of the claim made in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was not peer-reviewed scientific literature but a media interview with a scientist conducted in 1999
Thisawareness 1 year ago
@Thisawareness
This is irrelevant too...
terroil 1 year ago
Glacier scientist: I knew Data Hadnt Been Verified
The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.
Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.
Thisawareness 1 year ago
@Thisawareness
What you are saying is obviously irrelevant...
terroil 1 year ago
@terroil Yeah, truth is hate to those who hate the truth!
Choo Choo Pachurai!
Thisawareness 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Climate change chief says sorry for hot air claim over melting glaciers
By David Derbyshire
Last updated at 10:21 AM on 22nd January 2010
After a global outcry, Dr Rajendra Pachauri - chairman of the IPCC - has issued an unprecedented apology.
dailymai(.)co(.)uk/news/articl e-1245161/Climate-change-chief -says-sorry-hot-air-claim-melt ing-glaciers(.)html#ixzz0dLXw1 aeR
Thisawareness 1 year ago
Doug Benn is a glaciological LEGEND anyone who's studied a bit of glaciology would realise he knows what he's talking about. Im tired of these self indulging "sceptics" who know jack shit about the science of climate change. I find theyre often driven by some pseudo-cynical idea that scientists are just out to "absorb money" or something equally retarded and paranoid. How would these sceptics ever be able to tell us whether to believe in climate change when they not qualified to recognise it?
wykydsyx 1 year ago
That is the normal process, glaciers melt at the bottom. In some years they melt more than in other years. The glaciers have been getting shorter for 200 years, since the end of the Little Ice Age.
Why not show the top of the glacier where it is growing ?
HansVerbeek 2 years ago
Everything is a "normal", natural process. Thats not the question. The question is whether the pace (of melting) was stable, whether there was a period of growing and how intense it was, etc. The core samples show us that there is more melting than growing and that the melting has been accelerating. The question is whether human activity (a natural process) is a causally related factor and to what extent.
On average the Ngozumpa seems to be losing mass. Check it out in relevant literature.
terroil 2 years ago
Even if melting has accelerated, that could be caused by natural factors.
World temperature has not increased in the last 10 years, so the melting will once again become stable.
And if the glacier becomes shorter, the pace of melting will even decrease.
HansVerbeek 2 years ago
Natural factors like what? Anthropogenic activites are a natural factor too and those seem to be the best candidate...
Neither did the temperature decrease and Suns minimum is about to end. Meanwhile runnerup countries are massively industrializing and the emissions are growing too. Gives one really to think.
Dont know what you exactly mean. Indeed if glaciers are gone then there wont be anything to melt. Yet if they just keep melting, they can keep melting for a couple of hundred years.
terroil 2 years ago
My response was aimed the alarmist view in the video.
I think the human influence is dwarfed by natural factors.
In 200 years human influence on glaciers will al but disappear.
HansVerbeek 2 years ago
I dont hear there much alarmism at all. What did the scientist say at 2:55? Listen again.
We, the humans, are one of the natural factors. And currently there is no other one that would be as suited as our activities.
In 200 years hopefully we will have mastered some technology that will bring us forward and we wont rely on fossil fuels and other even much more dangerous substances like trifluoromethane which is potentially up to 15,000 times more efficient at trapping heat than carbon.
terroil 2 years ago
Thanx for setting me straight :-)
HansVerbeek 2 years ago
Scam, scam, scam
AgentEnigma 2 years ago
You are a scam, mister AgentEnigma? Well, I dont think I can help you there...
terroil 2 years ago
Quote....
"the Indian government published a discussion paper that pointed out that there was in fact no sign of any "abnormal" retreat in the Himalayan glaciers. India's environment minister Jairam Ramesh accused the IPCC of being "alarmist.""
Sums it up nicely I think
gizmobuelldude 2 years ago
LOL... And this shyte what we see here is "normal"? Erm... No... You are mixing apples with pears and thats the key problem here.
Again, I dont relate to any IPCC assessments. Yet you are attacking those. Thats a classical straw man issue.
If I remember well, the "alarmist claim" was about Himalayan glaciers melting in the comming 30-40 years. Obviously this is not the claim here, hence your straw man. Sums it up nicely...
terroil 2 years ago
Comment removed
gizmobuelldude 2 years ago
"more eco-cobblers"
Its all about measurements conducted by scientists active in the relevant field, aint it...
"Glaciers were melting..."
Sure, yet practically none were melting at a pace as they are now.
terroil 2 years ago
"Nothing has changed"
False... See evidence...
"Geologists challenged the claim"
Provide evidence.
"voodoo... IPCC"
I dont know about any IPCC voodo. I dont even ralate to any IPCC materials.
"world is getting cooler"
On the contrary...
terroil 2 years ago
What a load of bollocks ipcc got it all wrong,I wonder what other "errors" are yet to emerge into day light?
daterwat666 2 years ago
What errors? Dont you believe your own eyes? Dont you see the decrepit glacier? Obviously theres a difference of one magnitude if someone claims those (glaciers) will disappear in the coming 30 years and in contrast PRJ studies suggesting in the coming 300 years... Yet even if the glaciers are expected to disappear in the nex 300 years, the pace of melting is much faster than "naturally" (aka without human activities) would occur.
terroil 2 years ago
Its ironic that this was posted in the same week that the IPCC was forced to admit that its report on Himalayan ice melting had not foundation in science. Its own predictions are that it will be there for at least another 300 years. So this story is complete nonsense.
gizmobuelldude 2 years ago
@gizmobuelldude
timesonline(.)co(.)uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177(.)ece
?????
st-andrews(.)ac(.)uk/~dib2/research/ngozumpa(.)htm
!!!!!
Obviously if glaciologists conduct research at the site and publish in PRJs, thats called science.
Relating to hearsay is not.
Perhaps if you had listened (and read)carefully you wouldnt be spouting nonsense...
terroil 2 years ago