cse 104 class 10 part 10-11 What about the red sea crossing,why don't they find any evidence of the entire Egyptian army drowning? part 2,,what is the unicorn?,wisdom teeth prove evolution?

[paulokas69]

Jabal al-Lawz means "mountain of almonds", you dumbass.

[357MagnumBob]

Everyone: think! Ex 14:21-The LORD drove the sea back WITH A STRONG EAST WIND and turned it into dry land. 900 feet? Just because the center of the shallower spot is now 900 ft underwater doesn't mean it was then. If North America was then under a vast ice sheet, sea level would have been lower, allowing this x-ing (and colonization of N America across what is now the Bearing Sea). It may also be the shallow spot didn't drop down as far then. We only can observe what it looks like now.

[lizazoon]

Out of the JEWISH POST:--When we deal with the Exodus, we basically have one account-the Torah's. .When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing. But . . .

The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it

-- End of quote

[lizazoon]

Quote from The JEWISH POST About the Exodus, We basically have one account-the Torah's. When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing.

The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it..-- End of quote

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@lizazoon

So what?

G-d's Word & honest archeology are the judge, not majority opinion.

[lizazoon]

Exodus is plane impossible nonsense.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@lizazoon

you didn't watch the whole thing

[lizazoon]

@Eye2EyeIIIV Did you read the top comment ? When the american claim there was no president called Judas, are the Europeans going to argue that ? When the jews say there is no evidence for the Exodus, why do christians even try to dispute it. It first of all their business.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@lizazoon

I can provide u with empirical evidence that the Exodus & Mt Sinai are an historical account. U have a choice after that. U can continue to think u fool someone that your atheism is supportable & that evolutionism is scientific & remain a denialist, or u can question all that u have been taught since u were in kindergarten & begin seeking the truth.

Your statement that it is fact is an example of precisely the same kind of lies u were spoon-fed in school all of your life.

[lizazoon]

Generations of scholars tried to locate Mt. Sinai.and the stations of the tribes of Israel in the desert.

Despite all this diligent research not one site was identified that could correspond to the Biblical picture. Professor Ze'ev Herzog of Tel Aviv University.

[lizazoon]

Generations of scholars tried to locate Mt. Sinai.and the stations of the tribes of Israel in the desert.

Despite all this diligent research not one site was identified that could correspond to the Biblical picture. Professor Ze'ev Herzog of Tel Aviv University.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

My wisdom tooth have really been annoying me for weeks :P

[lizazoon]

The Exodus, The Parting of the Red Sea, is childish nonsense. Even today, crossing the Negev by foot, without modern equipment is impossible.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

Free Hovind!

[TheSaviouroftheworld]

@Eye2EyeIIIV Thanks for sending me to this video  - Unicorns, maybe? But not the flying one horned horse type. That makes more sense.

[AgApE010]

@Eye2Eye

Thank you for sending me this video, but this is not a good response. It seems that you and Dr. Hovind want to remain more faithful to the translation of the KJV than to the original language itself. This is an all-too-common tragedy among KJV Onlyists. The Hebrew word that the KJV translates as unicorn is rêym, which means wild bull. Why did the KJV translators translate it as "unicorn"? I'm not sure, but we need to allow for the possibility that they translated this word poorly.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

Simple facts: There are serious PROBLEMS with the modern versions, and certainly are not trustworthy if they had originated out of Egypt - a country really given a negative look in the Bible.

G-d promised He would preserve His words (Psalm 12)... and we've got it today!

[AgApE010]

Eye, is that really your argument? Just because Egypt was the land of bondage for Israel before the Exodus that manuscripts from over a thousand years later from there shouldn't be trusted? Egypt was a very Christian country during post-Apostolic times, the era from which those manuscripts come.

God did promise to reserve His word forever, and He certainly has. But you seem to think that that only the KJV.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@AgApE010

Now I'm sure that anybody, ANYBODY, can get saved through any modern version of the Bible. BUT... if u truly want to be a Bible student, if u really want to hold a preserved Word of G-d, I mean, if u ever come to the position of defending the Bible, ...u ought to get a King James Bible (because the new Bible versions that I'm aware of have some real serious errors & contradictions built in! But I'm not aware of any in the King James.)

~ Josiah-David ~

[AgApE010]

Eye, if you want to be a serious Bible student, it is first important to learn the languages. But as far as English translations go, the NASB most definitely does the best job, especially with the Greek text. The KJV poorly translates many Greek words. For example, Hebrews 4 speaks of rest in a few places in that chapter. Verse 9 uses a different word which is significant in understanding the text. The KJV reads "There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God."

continued

[AgApE010]

continued

...However, the word "rest" occurring in v. 9 is a different word from the other words in that chapter translated as "rest". The word is Sabbaton which means a "Sabbath" or "Sabbath rest", which is exactly how the NASB translates it: "So there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God." This is just one example; there are others like it.

[AgApE010]

Furthermore,the KJV relied in part on the Latin Vulgate, the Latin translation of Bible. So basically the KJV is, in part, a translation of a translation, and that certainly isn't a good thing.

If you want to use the KJV, that's fine. But don't try to say that modern translations are wrong or evil and that the KJV is the only allowable translation in English. Read the works of textual critical scholars about this, not the words of Hovind, who is a great man, but certainly not a textual scholar.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@AgApE010

KJV is based on the received text which is based on the majority of all Bible supporting Greek manuscripts {95%} of about 5,200 pieces & the mass-erotic Hebrew text which is different than the new bibles which r based on the Sinaiticus & Vaticanus & Alexandrenus which r totally tampered with & messed with & changed & corrected many times. One was found in the pope's library another was found in the garbage can in a monastery which were the Egyptian Alexandrian type. Worthless

[AgApE010]

@Eye2EyeIIIV

-

"mass-erotic"? Anyways, it doesn't matter where the manuscript was found; whether in a trash can or underground, it doesn't change its value and reliability. The fact is that these manuscripts are much older than the TR. And there certainly is no evidence of "tampering" or it being "messed with". You're making that up and I'm willing to bet you have done no real research on textual criticism in order to even speak intelligently on such things.

[glassbrain]

This is all incorrect and circumstantial, offering no merit to his outdated religous beliefs. Creationist fail again.

[sterbsr]

Have you listened at all?

[glassbrain]

Please explain which things Hovind has stated that have not been categorically disproven, proven to be outright lies; or misrepresentations.

[RJL738]

Archiology is a very interesting feild of study . w

Evolving would jsut mean a changing becasue of environment, it would have hardly anything to do with getting larger .

[Eye2Eye35]

I wouldn't be surprised if Kent Hovind was Jewish. Because I've found that a lot of Jewish people are incredibly smart and intelligent.

[DHammerr]

lol

[cptblade16]

All the evolutionsist need to see this video ... this guy rocks! I love all the findings.

[micah1116]

The evidence is out there and easily found if looked for, problem is they aren't looking for it, they are running from it.

[SeekMoksha]

Unicorn as a reptile? That's complete nonsense.

Why would there be dinosaurs when the bible was written? Or even 2000 years before the bible was written down.

Could maybe be a rhino though. :)

[Pulsar205]

well it could be a rhino. that's what i've been thinking. see his other videos about dinosaurs