u cant blame the troops for wanting to support their familys and our country. Its the few select people that run our military that needs to be protested and that now seems to be the U.N and the great king Obama
@fpontiac- I agree. Army's through out history have been told what to do. It would be one thing if they were oppressing us, but so far, they aren't. We will see what the king does.
@draco1002 - I thank you for your service. I think you will find out most of America appreciates the military. It is the loud America hater Jerks that get the press. Good luck.
these poor guys have to be in a desert HARSH HARSH HARSH conditions, and our buisness owners and bankers, don't care what the marines or the navy or any division, does for the united states, it's just sad people need to appreciate the marines more.
The next time you Code Pinkos walk past the house of the old lady on your
block, ask her what that Gold Star is doing hanging in her window. She'll tell
you that she lost her husband or son in WW2, and that their memory has been her only consolation all these decades.
And then, remind yourselves to thank her for his service, and remind yourselves that her son or husband gave up his life, so that YOU could have YOUR family members with you. And then go fuck yourselves. Commies...
whether that is true or not, it does not affect the selfish hatred shown by people, like you, for the men and women in our military, who have pledged to give their life for you and me. I will say for the 1000th time, the military does not decide where they go and what they do. The Elected officials of "our government" do. So your self righteous, un-appreciative HATE, is miss places on the military and should be on the elected officials. All of them because they voted for what you dislike.
this is one year ago but i dont give a fuck citizens are lower forms of like compared to marines marines are the ones who go to war and risk their own fuckin lifes let alone dedicate for us
Ok well if you want to look at why people oppose the military you have to look back when it first started. If you think for a bit, I know you can find the answer. In WWII, they were heroes. In the 60s, they were hated. So you have to think what the differences between those two points in time were. When you do find the answer, do not scorn the reason. In fact, its a sign of a healthy democracy.
OK, Lets look at that. In the 60s, the military was doing what they were told to by the elected govenment. They were not not oppressing the American public. (Even Kent state was the national guard, not the main military.) In the 60s, there was a draft, so the people in the military still had no decision on what they do. It is the elected officials that decide what the military does, not the military itself. So you need to oppose the elected officials not the military.
Yeah but I believe there was a draft in WWII as well so that's not really whats different. Remember the names they were called and what protesters accused of them. The thing was that the people had allot more in formation about that war and how it was fought. I know its frustrating but I was put threw this too. I got it pretty quick but then again my minor is in history. So tell me whats different about Vietnam compared to every war ever fought before it.
It was an unpopular war by the people, but I will state again, The politician put us in the war, not the military itself. If you like history, then you know the Iraq and the Veitnam war was passed by both houses no matter what they want you to believe now. So because the military did not send itself to war, I still don't understand why you don't blame the politicians rather than the military?
Now if you have a problem with all was because you now know it is hell, that is different. You don't like all war. I can understand that, but even though I don't have a 'minor is in history", I only have a lowly Electronic Engineering degree, I know enough history to know if some wars did not happen, we would be slaves to someone. Peace at all costs is slavery. Whether this war is good or bad will be judged by history. But it is the government that goes to war not the military.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Again you not getting what I'm trying to say. I'll give you one last try and I want you to think before giving the answer. You keep thinking to much on politics. There was a big revolution around that time. It put the war right in peoples living rooms.
You are right. I have no idea what you are saying so I have nothing to say about what you are saying. I am not wanting to play a guessing game, I just want to know what people thing. There are many things that people call 'revolutions'. TV revolution, culture revolution, communication revolution, sexual revolution.... If you have some point I am waiting to hear it.
OK fine I'll just go ahead and tell you. Yes, TV affected how people felt about the war and I was talking about the media. Reporters were reporting what was going on right in the middle of a battle. People for the first time had the chance to see the horrors of war in their living rooms. It was then when people stop seeing soldiers as heroes and started looking at them as killers.
Thank you for answering. That does not take into account the men who had been to war, and saw war first hand, yet still supported out military.I have seen war on tv, and it is Hell, but I still feel we need the military to protect us.I never said war was nice or preferable, but if another want to hurt and kill us,I feel we need to protect our selves.
If a meth addict came in your house for money with a Gun and was going to kill your family, would you kill him to protect your family?
If this was a comunistic country military pwoer would not alow thier people to bad mouth them so understand when there is no presure the need to disrepect is higher.
I do not understand your comment. Are you saying if there is no pressure from the government people feel more need to disrespect the military? Or are you saying that because we are not in a communistic government we need to disrespect the military because we can?
I do not think there is a need to disrespect anyone, especially if they vow to protect you with their life.
If you are against the marines I say go F*** yourself. Why the hell would you show so much disrespect to the people who give thier LIVES to keep you safe, too keep the country safe.
There was a Move America Forward protest in front of Berkeley City Hall. All of a sudden Code Pink members started going to them showing them pictures of dying Iraqis and dead soldiers.
Sadly, according to the City Hall, both protests were illegal EVEN THOUGH Move America Forward HAD a permit.
The term 'illegal' is an interesting thing. Many people use it these days with little or no knowledge of the actual laws. It is being flung around liberally by people that are acting on emotion rather than logical reading of the laws. It seems to be a mantra for people when they don't like something, and not because it is against any actual law.
When they(People from the People's Republic of Berkeley) burnt and desecrate the flag, they hated not only the Marines, but every man who loved this country.
I don't know why you say that. I promise you, I wrote this on February 18th. I then sent it to all my family. I have no need to plaiarise. It is interesting that you would say "plagiarism" with no link or proof or even an example of what you think I stole from. I put this up on 2/18/08. If you had an example we could see about dates on things, but ... Without any proof, I consider this comment worth nothing.
I'll tell you why they "hate the Marines." Because the Marines are part of the muscle behind the illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. And you can't use the cop-out of "they're just doing their job," or "they're just doing what they are told" because that excuse was put to rest at Nuremberg. That was not a legitimate excuse then and it's not NOW! Soldiers have a duty to DISOBEY illegal or immoral orders. These people CHOSE to join up and they are RESPONSIBLE!
It always amazes me how much liberals, people who claim tolerance, can hate so much. "I'll tell you why they "hate the Marines."" Don't you know that hate is what causes war? I have no doubt you hate me too. That does not bother me, as I do not value your opinion because it just fear fueled ravings. If you think that by not fighting an enemy, they will not kill you, you will be the first to die. So bury your head in the sand and stay in your fear and hate. Peace at all costs is slavery.
Why do liberals always use same old cop-out of "unconstitutional, and immoral". Maybe they could read the Constitution.
Unconstitutional:
The constitution gives congress the right to declare war, which most of them voted for both the Afghanistan and Iraq.
Immoral:
In a day where liberals say that what ever feels good, do it, what is immoral? I think hating your country where you are free is immoral. I think it is immoral to dishonor the memory of the 2,974 people that were killed on 9/11/01
United States Congress in October 2002 passed Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing the Iraq War. By definition this means it was legal because the congress passed a law to make it legal in this country. The Byrd Amendment
Affirmed that no additional constitutional authority was being ceded to the President outside of that necessary to deal with the threat posed by Iraq. So that made it Constitutional by way of amendment. All voted upon and passed by the Senate and House.
Now as far as whether it was "illegal" compared to the UN, I do not care. The security council did nothing to save the the 2,998 Americans on 9/11/2001 most of whom were civilians.
In 1987 I was working for a company named Jomar in LosAlamos NewMexico. I lost my job because a the company in France that we were selling a fuelrod scanner to was reselling it to Saddam in Iraq. The state department stopped the sale which cost our company $15,000,000. I was laid off.
A fuel rod scanner makes an assay of a spent fuel rod from a nuclear reactor. With that assay, you can find the weapons grade plutonium that is a byproduct of using the fuel rod. With that one can create a nuclear weapons.(weapons of mass destruction.) He was trying to get nuclear weapons. And he would continue to try.
I am glad we found no weapons of mass destruction. That means the state department did its job.
You can make anything constitutional by way of amendment. Just because congress says it's legal by definition doesn't mean that it's constitutional.
The UN issued sanctions against Taliban ruled Afghanistan unless they handed over Bin Laden BEFORE 9/11, which is a whole lot more than George Bush did to prevent 9/11, even though he was getting the reports about the 9/11 plot in his intell briefings. Ha, you whine about the UN not being on our side, but they did a lot more than Bush.
Actually, it does mean it is constitutional. Your first statement is not logical. Just because they amend the constitution does not make it constitutional??? With that illogic the Bill of Rights, women voting, abolishment of slavery and all the other amendments would not be valid. Discussing things logically, requires logic.
The UN is a defunct impotent corrupt entity. The security council had sanctioned Iraq for not complying with the inspections of nuclear materials. No one was supposed to be buying any oil from Iraq.But the Russia, Germans and French were all violating the sanction.What did the UN do about it?? Nothing as usual.The UN did not get Bin Laden. They did nothing except pass a few resolutions with no result. Sanctions only work if they are backedup.They are the ones willing to trade USA blood for oil.
Again, hate for our president, our country, and our citizens. George W. took office in January 2001. He was getting reports about terrorist activity. 100 reports a day. Which one is the real threat? Bill Clinton had gotten those same reports too for the last 8 years before. He even had a chance to get Bin Ladin. They knew where he was. But Bill was too busy playing golf to do anything. (Book- Dereliction of duty.) The UN never did anything after the earlier attacks.Lots of powerless resolutions.
Not sure what you are saying. Is the first word Good, or God? I went to your site, but you say you don't stand for anything, but have Hitler and Mussolini vids.?? If you had something Valid to say, then I would listen. But..
You seem to have constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth. Sense you don't seem to have anything to say except swear words, I will just block you.
First, let me explain a bit who i am so you get an idea of who is this coming from. I'm 25 y/o male Venezuelan citizen. I am not republican or democrat. And i have been in this country since 2000. Now with that said. It is a shame to what went on in Berkeley. The armed forces have a job to do, they don't pick the conflicts (politicians do). It is (still) a free country and you have the choice whether you walk into a recruiting office or not. This pinks are extremists... with out the bombs.
there are no tactics in recruiting, wut u think they slippin ruffies into their drinks come on, u have a right to say no anyways, n the ppl that want to become marines goto the recruiters office anyways, and its all volunteer shit, well maybe we need to take a look at what USMC means exactly. USMC: U SIGNED the MOTHERFUCKING CONTRACT, i am a Marine and im damn proud of it, i went to the recruiters and asked where to sign, they never did anything to me other than show me what i had to do to be 1.
I am glad to hear form one of the marines. I think the liberals in Berkeley think that anyone who wants to enlist in the marines was tricked, or is so dumb that they can't make up their own mind. That is wrong. They are citizens that feel the need to do their civic duty and protect this country. The marines don't want dumb people, they want smart people that can think on their feet in a hard situation. Thanks for putting your opinion in. Thanks for serving.
Well, Dude.. I am glad to entertain you. But you do prove a point. The people with the crudest words are the liberals. I find it interesting that you can spell the cuss words correctly, but nothing else. Then again it goes to prove how little liberals really know about anything. They just swear and call names. There was that funny too?
i have nothing wrong with the marienes(sry if my speling is bad) but this is not b/c we hate marienes but is that we hate the way in which they are used the tactics to train them, the tactics to recrute them and finaly the war in geniral
And again I say, If you have a problem with "the way in which they are used", then get mad at the people who decided to use them in that way, the senators, including Hillary, who voted to go into war Iraq and not the marines.
As far as recruitment, I am sure it is still a FREE country, except in Berkley. So people should have the freedom to do what is legal. And Liberals should be tolerant of others beliefs even if they believe in protecting this country. But, Liberals are not tolerant.
what tactics? they tell you what its like when your out off duty because they expect you to have common sense enough to know what it might be like in a war
With that logic, you can't go into any city in the USA and do what is legal because the people of that city will illegally infringe upon your rights? I am sorry, but I don't agree. There is legal, and illegal. There is right and wrong. That is like saying that it is OK for Little Rock, AR to keep African Americans from attending a LittleRock High school because the students "did provoke by going into the most" redneck city. It is a federal offense to block a recruitment center.Berkley is wrong!
I'm not saying they can't have their office in Berkeley, all I say that I believe it was just to provoke us people in The Bay Area. you can't keep African Americans out of a city, that is racism. Neither did I say marines can't have their office, I just don't like the recruiters here.
bfrance2002, I'm not saying they should leave as it's their legal right to be in berkeley, just like it's the legal right for african americans to be in any city they want, all I say is that I don't like marine recruiters in the bay area
You have the right to not like the marines, which is really where your beliefs come from on the "15 nukes" and not a logical thought processes of all scenarios that could happen. (Yes I remember you from the other page.) Anyone could use the word "provoke" to justify illegality, including the Mayor of Little Rock in 1957 and mayor of Berkeley in 2008. They are the same.
Great message, poor delivery. If you wrote this, practice the speaking a bit and it will be much more powerful. I am almost ashamed to admit that I live in Berkeley... but do not, in any way share the the "intolerant" and un-constitional views of the loud mouthed hippies w/ nothing better to do than direct their anger and efforts at the hand in peril rather than the "brain" commanding it.
...It is every individuals right to fight for their country, no matter what the reason may be. Realistically if someone wanted to join the Marines to better themselves or fight for what the believe in, they will drive 10 miles farther to do so. So what is their plan...Realistically?
Thanks for agreeing. This video was made for information, and not entertainment, so I did not spend time perfecting it. Maybe next time I will have my pretty wife read it and not my ugly mug. Really it is an excuse to get the message out.
Thank you Brian . I listen to your words and I agree with what you had too say. I think also the people in Berkeley CA ought to be charged with UN-American activities.
Thanks for the support. I expect many Liberals to post comments with "name calling". But that would not surprise me from people who hate others and are intolerant.
You obviously were not there and don't understand fanatic right-wing mentality. I myself am neutral on the situation and don't believe in the far-left nor right, but at these sort of activities/events it never fails that the fanatical right-wingers are always the most violent, out of control and vulgar. Every time.
Hmm, yea, you sound "neutral".NOT! You are correct, I was not there. I did not have to be. In the videos the were taken by the Pink themselves, it shows that they are the aggressors. They are confrontational by confronting and physically blocking anyone who comes to the door. So you are wrong. Look at the vids.. If the marines, right wing, were the aggressors, all the demonstrators would be dead because they have the guns. Again you are wrong. And you are left wing.
This has to do with a government entity, city council of Berkeley violating the rights of an American citizen who has pledged to give their life in protecting that same government entity. That is a shame.
I am talking about the Berkeley council , not the protesters. The protesters have the right to peacefully protest, as long as they don't trespass or violate the rights of others. Personally if they pushed me like that, I would have them on assault charges.
I'm from CA. I'm more of a reagan democrat. I vote for the best person not party lines though I would say I'm slightly on the left. I think what Berkeley did by protesting the marines is a disgrace. There I said it, a lib saying the berkeley anti-marine protesters need to stop smoking dope and pull their heads out of their asses.
This is why i dont like anti war people
TheMobster911 9 months ago
u cant blame the troops for wanting to support their familys and our country. Its the few select people that run our military that needs to be protested and that now seems to be the U.N and the great king Obama
fpontiac 11 months ago
@fpontiac- I agree. Army's through out history have been told what to do. It would be one thing if they were oppressing us, but so far, they aren't. We will see what the king does.
bfrance2002 10 months ago
Berkeley can SUCK IT!!!!
iLikeGuns88 11 months ago
@iLikeGuns88 - ;-)
bfrance2002 11 months ago
@bfrance2002 >:^{D
iLikeGuns88 11 months ago
Hey, I'm gonna be taking that very same oath prety soon, and it's good to see that not everybody in America hates my guts for enlisting
draco1002 1 year ago
@draco1002 - I thank you for your service. I think you will find out most of America appreciates the military. It is the loud America hater Jerks that get the press. Good luck.
bfrance2002 1 year ago
these poor guys have to be in a desert HARSH HARSH HARSH conditions, and our buisness owners and bankers, don't care what the marines or the navy or any division, does for the united states, it's just sad people need to appreciate the marines more.
GoldSilverMoneySkull 1 year ago
@GoldSilverMoneySkull - I agree.
bfrance2002 1 year ago
The next time you Code Pinkos walk past the house of the old lady on your
block, ask her what that Gold Star is doing hanging in her window. She'll tell
you that she lost her husband or son in WW2, and that their memory has been her only consolation all these decades.
And then, remind yourselves to thank her for his service, and remind yourselves that her son or husband gave up his life, so that YOU could have YOUR family members with you. And then go fuck yourselves. Commies...
Shawnster65 1 year ago
@Shawnster65 - I agree.
bfrance2002 1 year ago
Your statement is true.
Berkeley City Council were made of bunch of sissy, anti military and anti US.
They didn't know where their jobs, and freedom originated from.
arnolds83 1 year ago
@arnolds83 - I Agree. Freedom is not free.
bfrance2002 1 year ago
Your statement is true.
Berkeley City Council were made of bunch of sissy, anti military and anti US.
They didn't know where their jobs, and freedom originated from.
arnolds83 1 year ago
i know fuck those long hair surfing burrito eaten fags. fuck em we will shit on there front lawns and fuck there wives
picklesucf 2 years ago
It makes me sick that this shit is even a problem.
twreck45 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dude, you need to watch "ciacoupsofterror"'s channel over and over till you get it! Our government has never given a rat's ass about "Democracy."
OmarThePug 3 years ago
whether that is true or not, it does not affect the selfish hatred shown by people, like you, for the men and women in our military, who have pledged to give their life for you and me. I will say for the 1000th time, the military does not decide where they go and what they do. The Elected officials of "our government" do. So your self righteous, un-appreciative HATE, is miss places on the military and should be on the elected officials. All of them because they voted for what you dislike.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
this is one year ago but i dont give a fuck citizens are lower forms of like compared to marines marines are the ones who go to war and risk their own fuckin lifes let alone dedicate for us
devin2491 2 years ago
Ok well if you want to look at why people oppose the military you have to look back when it first started. If you think for a bit, I know you can find the answer. In WWII, they were heroes. In the 60s, they were hated. So you have to think what the differences between those two points in time were. When you do find the answer, do not scorn the reason. In fact, its a sign of a healthy democracy.
soulhunter59 3 years ago
OK, Lets look at that. In the 60s, the military was doing what they were told to by the elected govenment. They were not not oppressing the American public. (Even Kent state was the national guard, not the main military.) In the 60s, there was a draft, so the people in the military still had no decision on what they do. It is the elected officials that decide what the military does, not the military itself. So you need to oppose the elected officials not the military.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
Yeah but I believe there was a draft in WWII as well so that's not really whats different. Remember the names they were called and what protesters accused of them. The thing was that the people had allot more in formation about that war and how it was fought. I know its frustrating but I was put threw this too. I got it pretty quick but then again my minor is in history. So tell me whats different about Vietnam compared to every war ever fought before it.
soulhunter59 3 years ago
It was an unpopular war by the people, but I will state again, The politician put us in the war, not the military itself. If you like history, then you know the Iraq and the Veitnam war was passed by both houses no matter what they want you to believe now. So because the military did not send itself to war, I still don't understand why you don't blame the politicians rather than the military?
bfrance2002 3 years ago
Now if you have a problem with all was because you now know it is hell, that is different. You don't like all war. I can understand that, but even though I don't have a 'minor is in history", I only have a lowly Electronic Engineering degree, I know enough history to know if some wars did not happen, we would be slaves to someone. Peace at all costs is slavery. Whether this war is good or bad will be judged by history. But it is the government that goes to war not the military.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Again you not getting what I'm trying to say. I'll give you one last try and I want you to think before giving the answer. You keep thinking to much on politics. There was a big revolution around that time. It put the war right in peoples living rooms.
soulhunter59 3 years ago
You are right. I have no idea what you are saying so I have nothing to say about what you are saying. I am not wanting to play a guessing game, I just want to know what people thing. There are many things that people call 'revolutions'. TV revolution, culture revolution, communication revolution, sexual revolution.... If you have some point I am waiting to hear it.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
OK fine I'll just go ahead and tell you. Yes, TV affected how people felt about the war and I was talking about the media. Reporters were reporting what was going on right in the middle of a battle. People for the first time had the chance to see the horrors of war in their living rooms. It was then when people stop seeing soldiers as heroes and started looking at them as killers.
soulhunter61 3 years ago 2
Thank you for answering. That does not take into account the men who had been to war, and saw war first hand, yet still supported out military.I have seen war on tv, and it is Hell, but I still feel we need the military to protect us.I never said war was nice or preferable, but if another want to hurt and kill us,I feel we need to protect our selves.
If a meth addict came in your house for money with a Gun and was going to kill your family, would you kill him to protect your family?
bfrance2002 3 years ago
If this was a comunistic country military pwoer would not alow thier people to bad mouth them so understand when there is no presure the need to disrepect is higher.
Pokegreg8 3 years ago
I do not understand your comment. Are you saying if there is no pressure from the government people feel more need to disrespect the military? Or are you saying that because we are not in a communistic government we need to disrespect the military because we can?
I do not think there is a need to disrespect anyone, especially if they vow to protect you with their life.
If I misunderstand you, please clarify.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
If you are against the marines I say go F*** yourself. Why the hell would you show so much disrespect to the people who give thier LIVES to keep you safe, too keep the country safe.
HellJumper64 3 years ago
I agree, although I would have put it a little nicer. (At least in writing.)
bfrance2002 3 years ago
oooorahhhh brother! semper fi!
KShaneUSMC 3 years ago 2
There was a Move America Forward protest in front of Berkeley City Hall. All of a sudden Code Pink members started going to them showing them pictures of dying Iraqis and dead soldiers.
Sadly, according to the City Hall, both protests were illegal EVEN THOUGH Move America Forward HAD a permit.
WaffleBakingStar 3 years ago 3
I agree.
The term 'illegal' is an interesting thing. Many people use it these days with little or no knowledge of the actual laws. It is being flung around liberally by people that are acting on emotion rather than logical reading of the laws. It seems to be a mantra for people when they don't like something, and not because it is against any actual law.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
When they(People from the People's Republic of Berkeley) burnt and desecrate the flag, they hated not only the Marines, but every man who loved this country.
WaffleBakingStar 3 years ago 3
Good job, keep up the good work 5/5
Devilsfurry 3 years ago 4
try to come up with your own materialn next time, no script next time. dont plagiarism
liamk123456 3 years ago
I don't know why you say that. I promise you, I wrote this on February 18th. I then sent it to all my family. I have no need to plaiarise. It is interesting that you would say "plagiarism" with no link or proof or even an example of what you think I stole from. I put this up on 2/18/08. If you had an example we could see about dates on things, but ... Without any proof, I consider this comment worth nothing.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
I'll tell you why they "hate the Marines." Because the Marines are part of the muscle behind the illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. And you can't use the cop-out of "they're just doing their job," or "they're just doing what they are told" because that excuse was put to rest at Nuremberg. That was not a legitimate excuse then and it's not NOW! Soldiers have a duty to DISOBEY illegal or immoral orders. These people CHOSE to join up and they are RESPONSIBLE!
1factoid 3 years ago
It always amazes me how much liberals, people who claim tolerance, can hate so much. "I'll tell you why they "hate the Marines."" Don't you know that hate is what causes war? I have no doubt you hate me too. That does not bother me, as I do not value your opinion because it just fear fueled ravings. If you think that by not fighting an enemy, they will not kill you, you will be the first to die. So bury your head in the sand and stay in your fear and hate. Peace at all costs is slavery.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
Why do liberals always use same old cop-out of "unconstitutional, and immoral". Maybe they could read the Constitution.
Unconstitutional:
The constitution gives congress the right to declare war, which most of them voted for both the Afghanistan and Iraq.
Immoral:
In a day where liberals say that what ever feels good, do it, what is immoral? I think hating your country where you are free is immoral. I think it is immoral to dishonor the memory of the 2,974 people that were killed on 9/11/01
bfrance2002 3 years ago
"The constitution gives congress the right to declare war, which most of them voted for both the Afghanistan and Iraq."
Incorrect. The Iraq authorization was not a declaration of war-which hasn't been issued since WW2. By your own definition the war is unconstitutional.
d3p3ch3mod3 3 years ago
United States Congress in October 2002 passed Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing the Iraq War. By definition this means it was legal because the congress passed a law to make it legal in this country. The Byrd Amendment
Affirmed that no additional constitutional authority was being ceded to the President outside of that necessary to deal with the threat posed by Iraq. So that made it Constitutional by way of amendment. All voted upon and passed by the Senate and House.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
Now as far as whether it was "illegal" compared to the UN, I do not care. The security council did nothing to save the the 2,998 Americans on 9/11/2001 most of whom were civilians.
In 1987 I was working for a company named Jomar in LosAlamos NewMexico. I lost my job because a the company in France that we were selling a fuelrod scanner to was reselling it to Saddam in Iraq. The state department stopped the sale which cost our company $15,000,000. I was laid off.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
A fuel rod scanner makes an assay of a spent fuel rod from a nuclear reactor. With that assay, you can find the weapons grade plutonium that is a byproduct of using the fuel rod. With that one can create a nuclear weapons.(weapons of mass destruction.) He was trying to get nuclear weapons. And he would continue to try.
I am glad we found no weapons of mass destruction. That means the state department did its job.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
You can make anything constitutional by way of amendment. Just because congress says it's legal by definition doesn't mean that it's constitutional.
The UN issued sanctions against Taliban ruled Afghanistan unless they handed over Bin Laden BEFORE 9/11, which is a whole lot more than George Bush did to prevent 9/11, even though he was getting the reports about the 9/11 plot in his intell briefings. Ha, you whine about the UN not being on our side, but they did a lot more than Bush.
d3p3ch3mod3 3 years ago
Actually, it does mean it is constitutional. Your first statement is not logical. Just because they amend the constitution does not make it constitutional??? With that illogic the Bill of Rights, women voting, abolishment of slavery and all the other amendments would not be valid. Discussing things logically, requires logic.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
The UN is a defunct impotent corrupt entity. The security council had sanctioned Iraq for not complying with the inspections of nuclear materials. No one was supposed to be buying any oil from Iraq.But the Russia, Germans and French were all violating the sanction.What did the UN do about it?? Nothing as usual.The UN did not get Bin Laden. They did nothing except pass a few resolutions with no result. Sanctions only work if they are backedup.They are the ones willing to trade USA blood for oil.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
Again, hate for our president, our country, and our citizens. George W. took office in January 2001. He was getting reports about terrorist activity. 100 reports a day. Which one is the real threat? Bill Clinton had gotten those same reports too for the last 8 years before. He even had a chance to get Bin Ladin. They knew where he was. But Bill was too busy playing golf to do anything. (Book- Dereliction of duty.) The UN never did anything after the earlier attacks.Lots of powerless resolutions.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
GOOOD-DAMMMN
EaglesOnShield 3 years ago
Not sure what you are saying. Is the first word Good, or God? I went to your site, but you say you don't stand for anything, but have Hitler and Mussolini vids.?? If you had something Valid to say, then I would listen. But..
You seem to have constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth. Sense you don't seem to have anything to say except swear words, I will just block you.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
First, let me explain a bit who i am so you get an idea of who is this coming from. I'm 25 y/o male Venezuelan citizen. I am not republican or democrat. And i have been in this country since 2000. Now with that said. It is a shame to what went on in Berkeley. The armed forces have a job to do, they don't pick the conflicts (politicians do). It is (still) a free country and you have the choice whether you walk into a recruiting office or not. This pinks are extremists... with out the bombs.
PapiJack 3 years ago 2
I agree. Thanks.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
there are no tactics in recruiting, wut u think they slippin ruffies into their drinks come on, u have a right to say no anyways, n the ppl that want to become marines goto the recruiters office anyways, and its all volunteer shit, well maybe we need to take a look at what USMC means exactly. USMC: U SIGNED the MOTHERFUCKING CONTRACT, i am a Marine and im damn proud of it, i went to the recruiters and asked where to sign, they never did anything to me other than show me what i had to do to be 1.
kendo411 3 years ago 2
I am glad to hear form one of the marines. I think the liberals in Berkeley think that anyone who wants to enlist in the marines was tricked, or is so dumb that they can't make up their own mind. That is wrong. They are citizens that feel the need to do their civic duty and protect this country. The marines don't want dumb people, they want smart people that can think on their feet in a hard situation. Thanks for putting your opinion in. Thanks for serving.
bfrance2002 3 years ago
im sry dude but this vid so so fucking hlarious omg i couldent stop loling
dude ur so funny the way youo look at things from only one perspective it makes me smile ^_^ anyway dude u be hella funny
OMFGHIPPO 4 years ago
Well, Dude.. I am glad to entertain you. But you do prove a point. The people with the crudest words are the liberals. I find it interesting that you can spell the cuss words correctly, but nothing else. Then again it goes to prove how little liberals really know about anything. They just swear and call names. There was that funny too?
bfrance2002 4 years ago
i am a citizen of berkeley and i believe that
i have nothing wrong with the marienes(sry if my speling is bad) but this is not b/c we hate marienes but is that we hate the way in which they are used the tactics to train them, the tactics to recrute them and finaly the war in geniral
btw this is a very funny video to a liberal
i was loling the whole time
OMFGHIPPO 4 years ago
And again I say, If you have a problem with "the way in which they are used", then get mad at the people who decided to use them in that way, the senators, including Hillary, who voted to go into war Iraq and not the marines.
As far as recruitment, I am sure it is still a FREE country, except in Berkley. So people should have the freedom to do what is legal. And Liberals should be tolerant of others beliefs even if they believe in protecting this country. But, Liberals are not tolerant.
bfrance2002 4 years ago
what tactics? they tell you what its like when your out off duty because they expect you to have common sense enough to know what it might be like in a war
kewsup 3 years ago
Great video!
hawkens7777 4 years ago
I can finaly breathe a sigh of relief that not all the real Americans are dead.
Thank you for your video and god bless you, sir.
ElZomboFantasma 4 years ago 2
Thank you for trying to enlighten.
God Bless All our Military Members, A big Thank you for serving for us who can not.
AmericanAce 4 years ago 2
You do make sense but I think that the marines did provoke by going into the most liberal city here in California.
michelledornier 4 years ago
With that logic, you can't go into any city in the USA and do what is legal because the people of that city will illegally infringe upon your rights? I am sorry, but I don't agree. There is legal, and illegal. There is right and wrong. That is like saying that it is OK for Little Rock, AR to keep African Americans from attending a LittleRock High school because the students "did provoke by going into the most" redneck city. It is a federal offense to block a recruitment center.Berkley is wrong!
bfrance2002 4 years ago
I'm not saying they can't have their office in Berkeley, all I say that I believe it was just to provoke us people in The Bay Area. you can't keep African Americans out of a city, that is racism. Neither did I say marines can't have their office, I just don't like the recruiters here.
michelledornier 4 years ago
bfrance2002, I'm not saying they should leave as it's their legal right to be in berkeley, just like it's the legal right for african americans to be in any city they want, all I say is that I don't like marine recruiters in the bay area
michelledornier 4 years ago
You have the right to not like the marines, which is really where your beliefs come from on the "15 nukes" and not a logical thought processes of all scenarios that could happen. (Yes I remember you from the other page.) Anyone could use the word "provoke" to justify illegality, including the Mayor of Little Rock in 1957 and mayor of Berkeley in 2008. They are the same.
bfrance2002 4 years ago
Great message, poor delivery. If you wrote this, practice the speaking a bit and it will be much more powerful. I am almost ashamed to admit that I live in Berkeley... but do not, in any way share the the "intolerant" and un-constitional views of the loud mouthed hippies w/ nothing better to do than direct their anger and efforts at the hand in peril rather than the "brain" commanding it.
Nomisar15 4 years ago
...It is every individuals right to fight for their country, no matter what the reason may be. Realistically if someone wanted to join the Marines to better themselves or fight for what the believe in, they will drive 10 miles farther to do so. So what is their plan...Realistically?
Nomisar15 4 years ago
Thanks for agreeing. This video was made for information, and not entertainment, so I did not spend time perfecting it. Maybe next time I will have my pretty wife read it and not my ugly mug. Really it is an excuse to get the message out.
bfrance2002 4 years ago
The message is what really counts my friend and I thank you for that. Sadly, showmanship happens to be the only way to reach the masses, as always.
Nomisar15 4 years ago
Brian, Well Put. Unforunately, not all Americans have common sense or the ability to critically think.
Txman1996 4 years ago
Thank you Brian . I listen to your words and I agree with what you had too say. I think also the people in Berkeley CA ought to be charged with UN-American activities.
ugeenbenhemmer 4 years ago
Thanks for the support. I expect many Liberals to post comments with "name calling". But that would not surprise me from people who hate others and are intolerant.
bfrance2002 4 years ago
You obviously were not there and don't understand fanatic right-wing mentality. I myself am neutral on the situation and don't believe in the far-left nor right, but at these sort of activities/events it never fails that the fanatical right-wingers are always the most violent, out of control and vulgar. Every time.
betbowt 4 years ago
Hmm, yea, you sound "neutral".NOT! You are correct, I was not there. I did not have to be. In the videos the were taken by the Pink themselves, it shows that they are the aggressors. They are confrontational by confronting and physically blocking anyone who comes to the door. So you are wrong. Look at the vids.. If the marines, right wing, were the aggressors, all the demonstrators would be dead because they have the guns. Again you are wrong. And you are left wing.
But you are off subject.
bfrance2002 4 years ago
This has to do with a government entity, city council of Berkeley violating the rights of an American citizen who has pledged to give their life in protecting that same government entity. That is a shame.
I am talking about the Berkeley council , not the protesters. The protesters have the right to peacefully protest, as long as they don't trespass or violate the rights of others. Personally if they pushed me like that, I would have them on assault charges.
bfrance2002 4 years ago
I'm from CA. I'm more of a reagan democrat. I vote for the best person not party lines though I would say I'm slightly on the left. I think what Berkeley did by protesting the marines is a disgrace. There I said it, a lib saying the berkeley anti-marine protesters need to stop smoking dope and pull their heads out of their asses.
Seiven 4 years ago
Wow, a lib that can actually think.. Cool. Tanks, I agree with you, at least on this subject. Maybe there is hope after all.
bfrance2002 4 years ago
hells ya!!
tx55drexray 4 years ago