We walked our evac route on 8/29 in memory of Katrina victims. About a hundred of us & were holding banners which clearly showed who we were. Walking Together Legally. We had children and elderly with us with us. Suddenly we were watched by police cars marked and unmarked. IF WE don't surround and watch them at their headquarters with signs & banners reminding them of the constiturion and abuse of authotrity,the Right to voice Will Be Lost, and The mission of war criminals will be accomplished
cant wait till I get to see some action.. MLK. RIP.. non violence is not the answer. We must fight fire with fire.. not only physically, but mentally.. tune in to my vids! RNC welcoming committe, contact me.. The movement needs a big boost with some counter intelligence of our own.. like i said fight the fire... its the only way..
You people (the protesters) are a bunch of tards. You go and trash both public and private property, toss bicycles in front of moving vehicles, block intersections, and attack delegates. Then you have the audacity to cry police brutality. LOL. If you're going to go about a protest in this manner don't cry like a bunch of little school girls when you get arrested. Did somebody call a WAAAAAMMMBULLLLANNNCEEEEE? ha ha ha.
What gets me is all these wannabe revolutionaries carring banners that read abolish capitalism ect, are probably wearing clothes and footwear bearing the labels of the companies they want to abolish.
you can buy corporate labels at second hand stores. You are right in saying that we are slaves to the corporate system. You're from Britain what the fuck do you have to say about an American revolution. You probably wearing the same clothes. Made by slaves for slaves.
The purchasing power of the population is more powerful. Or do you prefer the bland conformity of Mao's China or North Korea, or are you more the Enver Hoxha kind of guy?
Then stop talking like one. If you don't like living in a capitalist society, there are plenty of other countries to go and live in. I've heard Cuba is quite nice this time of year.
I don't see how I'm a hypocrite, and my age would be irrelevant if I thought as you do. I am not left-wing, and to imply I'm a liberal would suggest I'm ignorant enough to believe the system can be changed; it can't.
You are just another idealistic youngster. You whine about the system you live in, and yet enjoy all the benefits that system produces. The 'system' changes naturally, just as has always done.
My views may be considered idealistic, however that does not mean they are unattainable or unrealistic. Age is an absolute red herring, and the anarchist movement isn't subjected to one age group. I 'whine' about the system, because I don't believe we were meant to live this way, and we as human beings can achieve much greater than mediocrity. I am not anti-civilization, nor am I anti-technology. I use only what is necessary, and I aim to consume as little as possible.
The 'anarchist movement' is an irrelevant movement, as you can't change things by a free thinking group, human history has shown that. The spoon has to be washed dried and put away. And the people at the top will enforce you to do that, and you will have to do that. If you or the anarchists want to implement change, you have to get into positions of power, and that rabble on the video clips will never get into that position.
The anarchist movement is the expression of true freedom and equality. Apparently, you're not familiar with the Zapatistas of Mexico, or the CNT during the Spanish Civil War. History has shown that power, whether it be fuedalism, democracy, communism, fascism, dictatorship, a republic, etc. corrupts. The real battle for political power is won in the streets, not by the ballet. Anarchism is just as relevant, if not more so, as other ideals.
Political power has never been won on the streets, nothing has ever been won on the streets. As for 'Anarchism is just as relevant, if not more so, as other ideals' The rule of the spoon puts all that tripe into context.
Our reliance on politicians, and our willingness to believe they are serving the people is getting us nowhere. For example: the democrats promised progress once they took control of congress and the senate, and have so far fulfilled only their own interest. The current administration's corruption is self-evident, and doesn't really need any discussion. In reality, voting serves no purpose, politicians are parasites. "The rule of the spoon" is a vague metaphor that frankly, doesn't mean shit.
No one needs to be in charge, and the "rule of the spoon" is nonsensical. Anarcho-syndicalism promotes collectivized factories and farms, democratically-managed (no bosses, no managers, etc.) work places, and an economy that is regulated by the people as a whole. The CNT managed to pull it of during the Spanish Civil War (until defeated by the Axis), and the Zapatistas are based on the same concept. Have you ever even read anything on anarchism?
Anarchism or not, human society from the year zero has always had someone as the head of a group. As for 'collectivized factories and farms' that smacks of communism, and even they have someone at the top. The republicans in the Spanish Civil spent more time fighting among themselves then they did the nationalists. As for the rule of the spoon, being 'nonsensical', you are wrong. The spoon must be washed, dried and put away. If you refuse to do it, the authorities will make you do it.
Part of human development is your environment, and human beings will generally accept their birthright. Some Native American civilizations were autonomous, and rarely fought wars. Karl Marx was influenced heavily by anarchism, and syndicalism and socialism are very similar. I'm not talking about the republicans, I'm talking about the anarcho-syndicalists, who were only defeated because they were up against the axis. "The rule of the spoon" doesn't really apply here.
ALL groups of humans have someone at the top, wheather it is a tribe or a nation. And rules are needed. To deny that fact is to deny human society. The rule of the spoon applys everywhere you have human beings in a community.
Human beings existed long before any form of government, and many early humans were independent. The CNT had no leaders, and the Zapatistas have no leader. Community organization doesn't need hierarchy to sustain itself, all it needs is cooperation. Human beings have a basic understanding of right and wrong, and should live by ideals, not the law. "The rule of the spoon" doesn't apply when there's no one on top. Those who believe it's necessary to wash, dry, and put away "the spoon" will do so.
Humans in groups always have a leader, it goes back to our origins in ape communities, with the 'Alpha Male'. And you don't seem to understand the importance of rules in human communities, rules have to be enforced, and the rule of the spoon extends across the whole group, and both sexes. BTW FWIW I am as old as Nick.
Humans in groups don't have to have a leader, the CNT proved it, the Zapatistas are proving it, the thousands of autonomous affinity groups and organizations are proving it. Obviously, there is something that divides us from ape ancestors, years of evolution. Humans have morals, a basic understanding of right from wrong, and should morally govern themselves. We as humans have the ability to defy the idea of authority, the idea of government, and the idea of control in general.
Nonsense, you get any group of humans together, and some will naturally become the head of that group. Evolution is embedded into our genes, and how we react in a group, in that their will naturally be members of the group will will become the head of the group. You can defy the authorities all you like, but you won't achieve anything. All that street protest in the videos didn't change a single item in the US governments agenda.
I agree with the similarities but we can not rise to their level of violence. Not yet anyways. A violent Revolution only follows a defeated peaceful one. We still have the chance to succeed in this war on humanity. We must do it without violence. (please don't trash my comment, I would rather have a civil discussion)
I'm for your cause. BUT YOUR GOING ABOUT THIS ALL WRONG. If us use vandalism and vilence then u give them the right to arrest u, and u SHOULD be arrested. And if u insist on doing it then stop crying i'm inocent and police brutality when it happens. because u deserved it.
Ya, lets blame the cops. The cops coundn't possably missinformed and brainwashed as has been said multiple times. They clearly just have a true hatred for freedom. The cop was clearly just trying to maintain order. if people weren't slicing tires and dragging trash cans into the street maybe there would be less misconseptions about your or there or our organizations. maybe they'd listen to us instead of just saying "crazy anarchists"
I do believe in self-defense. But i'm pretty sure that if i dig down deep into ur statement i see a refrence into something in the video. What self-defense do u speak of?
so its okay for them to inflict violence on us, but its wrong when we inflict violence on them and/or objects? That makes sense I guess. Police and property are superior to the rest of us. I'd much rather have my face smashed in then defend myself.
ya see, now u understand. i couldn't possably be infering that two wrongs don't make a right, so u picked out my point and said it exactly as i ment it. aaa i do love sarcasm. not as if there was any here of cource.
Occupation, solidarity, refusal to submit are all core to non-violence. Occupation, solidarity and refusal to submit are all core to Black Bloc protest methods too. Non-violence isn't about marching in the street, holding signs and chanting slogans. It's about absolute non-cooperation with forces you disagree with. I'd put more faith in the success of a Black Bloc protest than in any government sanctioned protest armed with empty signs and slogans.
All this talk of Gandhi... I wonder if those who espouse Gandhi's theory of non-violent protest would actually follow it through to its very end. Would you hold your ground without responding whilst police beat you? Would you maintain solidarity by absolute refusal to move in the face of massive violent oppression? Could you stand in front of a military tank like the kid in Tiahnamen Square? That's non-violent protest. But I doubt any of these people would have the balls to do so.
i'm not sure if i follow your response. I'm not a pacifist by any means. But I'm sick of people aligning Gandhi with meanless 'pacifist' (or more the point, placid) marches.
Gandhi's methods were courageous but as are those who fight back when hit by State violence. People who use Gandhi as an excuse not to fight shouldn't be involved in the fight in the first place.
It's funny you say only violent people try to hide their identity... do you find it interesting that the cops all hide their faces behind identical riot helmets? Find a single cop in the midst of a riot... then try to find him again five minutes later. Blue bloc anyone? Makes it difficult to file a police brutality claim...
The people who are causing damage are doing exactly want the powers that be want. They make protesters look like asses. I know everyone is angry but you'd make a bigger better point if you'd listen to Ghandi. No violence. Arn't you producing what you are against? Big Thanx to all of the brave press at the protests!!! Peace n One love
I'm sure the media will show violent protesters. This is what they want to portray and it was just given to them. Seeing police beat up nonviolent protesters is a bigger message and would be shown by the media eventually but they prefer the violence to discredit the protest. They got what they wanted. I hope I'm wrong and I won't find out cause I don't watch tv. Do what you want tho. Violence creates violence. If you want to live in a violent world then be violent. Peace creates peace.
Don't get me wrong; we don't want to be violent. It's just that more often the police will try to antagonize the protesters in an attempt to make the protesters (both violent and non-violent) look bad.
I know of no activist, revolutionary, or theorist relevant to the movement today who advocates only the use of violent tactics and opposes any usage of tactics that could not be called violent. We are advocates of a diversity of tactics, meaning effective combinations drawn from a full range of tactics that might lead to liberation
from all the components of this oppressive system: white supremacy, patriarchy, capitalism, and the state.
We also tend to believe that means are reflected in the ends, and would not want to act in a way that invariably would lead to dictatorship or some other form of society that does not respect life and freedom. As such, we can more accurately be described as proponents of revolutionary or militant activism than as proponents of violence.
Nice vid, there's some killer footage in there. I'm glad to see the Black Bloc is still armed and ready, I was afraid they'd faded into obscurity the last few years.
The MSM is 5 corporations all ruled by Zionist Jesuit NWO Vatican & Rothschild owed by Zionist Jesuit G.E., Time Warner, Walt Disney, News Corp, & CBS. Break them up with the
Sherman Antitrust Law & Clayton Acts. If our US Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches weren't Bilderberg and CFR owned they could enforce our laws. Oh! their buying their way out of chaos. We're coming for you 1st TRAITORS of We the People, Bill of Rights, and US Constitution.
What is this supposed to mean? Are you calling these folks slaves? Morons? Please state your case, or is your name - Demo08 - all we need know about your stance?
Democracy requires tolerance of all political beliefs - you know, the Rodney thang: Can't we call get along. Name calling, if that is what was attempted, has no place in our pursuit of democracy.
Unless you're an undemocratic Democrat. The Dem. Party itself WON'T OPEN THE DEBATES and allow other points of view. That's NOT democracy.
democracy is mob rule. f*ck democracy. (especially the faux-democracy we are currently living under)
we live in a constitutional republic, where our rights CANNOT be taken away. believing that we live in a democracy is EXACTLY the reason that the govt can take our rights away.
Nice use of ¡Tchkung! Smash things up is my favorite song by them.
Anokpoet 2 years ago 2
january 20th.
nuff said.
a criminal leaves office on that date.
god these 8 years were way more than any of us should have had to put up with.
66flamer 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC
You'll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is
AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!!
Go to this website...
frexis.*com/PCTV17.html
(DELETE the *)
check it out................its cool, i've got it myself.
ppiuaaaar 3 years ago
We walked our evac route on 8/29 in memory of Katrina victims. About a hundred of us & were holding banners which clearly showed who we were. Walking Together Legally. We had children and elderly with us with us. Suddenly we were watched by police cars marked and unmarked. IF WE don't surround and watch them at their headquarters with signs & banners reminding them of the constiturion and abuse of authotrity,the Right to voice Will Be Lost, and The mission of war criminals will be accomplished
4aaaaa4 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC
You'll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is
AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!!
Go to this website...
frexis.*com/PCTV17.html
(DELETE the *)
check it out................its cool, i've got it myself.
ppiuaaaaq 3 years ago
cant wait till I get to see some action.. MLK. RIP.. non violence is not the answer. We must fight fire with fire.. not only physically, but mentally.. tune in to my vids! RNC welcoming committe, contact me.. The movement needs a big boost with some counter intelligence of our own.. like i said fight the fire... its the only way..
tune in to my vids!
MV951 3 years ago
Hey what's that song playing during the compilation?
IrishDroog 3 years ago
I would also like to know.
meeputube 3 years ago
Oh... In the credits... its XOC - It Chkung!
meeputube 3 years ago
The name of the band is !TchKung! and the name of the song is "Smash Things Up"
silentsniper61 3 years ago
We're all slaves to the corporations.
kingj655 3 years ago
You people (the protesters) are a bunch of tards. You go and trash both public and private property, toss bicycles in front of moving vehicles, block intersections, and attack delegates. Then you have the audacity to cry police brutality. LOL. If you're going to go about a protest in this manner don't cry like a bunch of little school girls when you get arrested. Did somebody call a WAAAAAMMMBULLLLANNNCEEEEE? ha ha ha.
mattzdope 3 years ago
What gets me is all these wannabe revolutionaries carring banners that read abolish capitalism ect, are probably wearing clothes and footwear bearing the labels of the companies they want to abolish.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
you can buy corporate labels at second hand stores. You are right in saying that we are slaves to the corporate system. You're from Britain what the fuck do you have to say about an American revolution. You probably wearing the same clothes. Made by slaves for slaves.
kingj655 3 years ago
Apprently a lot more then you. Marks and Spencer makes slave clothes?
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
As long as we accept their power, we're all slaves.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
The purchasing power of the population is more powerful. Or do you prefer the bland conformity of Mao's China or North Korea, or are you more the Enver Hoxha kind of guy?
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
I'm not a communist. Try again, pretentious prick.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago 2
Then stop talking like one. If you don't like living in a capitalist society, there are plenty of other countries to go and live in. I've heard Cuba is quite nice this time of year.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
Communists believe in a completely state-run society, I don't. Cuba? No thanks, I'd like to stay here and watch this empire bleed to death.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
A typical hypocrisy attitude so prevailent of young western leftish liberals.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
I don't see how I'm a hypocrite, and my age would be irrelevant if I thought as you do. I am not left-wing, and to imply I'm a liberal would suggest I'm ignorant enough to believe the system can be changed; it can't.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
You are just another idealistic youngster. You whine about the system you live in, and yet enjoy all the benefits that system produces. The 'system' changes naturally, just as has always done.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
My views may be considered idealistic, however that does not mean they are unattainable or unrealistic. Age is an absolute red herring, and the anarchist movement isn't subjected to one age group. I 'whine' about the system, because I don't believe we were meant to live this way, and we as human beings can achieve much greater than mediocrity. I am not anti-civilization, nor am I anti-technology. I use only what is necessary, and I aim to consume as little as possible.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
The 'anarchist movement' is an irrelevant movement, as you can't change things by a free thinking group, human history has shown that. The spoon has to be washed dried and put away. And the people at the top will enforce you to do that, and you will have to do that. If you or the anarchists want to implement change, you have to get into positions of power, and that rabble on the video clips will never get into that position.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
The anarchist movement is the expression of true freedom and equality. Apparently, you're not familiar with the Zapatistas of Mexico, or the CNT during the Spanish Civil War. History has shown that power, whether it be fuedalism, democracy, communism, fascism, dictatorship, a republic, etc. corrupts. The real battle for political power is won in the streets, not by the ballet. Anarchism is just as relevant, if not more so, as other ideals.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
Political power has never been won on the streets, nothing has ever been won on the streets. As for 'Anarchism is just as relevant, if not more so, as other ideals' The rule of the spoon puts all that tripe into context.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
Our reliance on politicians, and our willingness to believe they are serving the people is getting us nowhere. For example: the democrats promised progress once they took control of congress and the senate, and have so far fulfilled only their own interest. The current administration's corruption is self-evident, and doesn't really need any discussion. In reality, voting serves no purpose, politicians are parasites. "The rule of the spoon" is a vague metaphor that frankly, doesn't mean shit.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
The rule of the spoon means everything in a group. It transcends all group discussion, and is something the group must comply with.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
Abolishing government doesn't mean abolishing responsibilities.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
And who is going to be in charge? The rule of the spoon requires someone to be in charge.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
No one needs to be in charge, and the "rule of the spoon" is nonsensical. Anarcho-syndicalism promotes collectivized factories and farms, democratically-managed (no bosses, no managers, etc.) work places, and an economy that is regulated by the people as a whole. The CNT managed to pull it of during the Spanish Civil War (until defeated by the Axis), and the Zapatistas are based on the same concept. Have you ever even read anything on anarchism?
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
Anarchism or not, human society from the year zero has always had someone as the head of a group. As for 'collectivized factories and farms' that smacks of communism, and even they have someone at the top. The republicans in the Spanish Civil spent more time fighting among themselves then they did the nationalists. As for the rule of the spoon, being 'nonsensical', you are wrong. The spoon must be washed, dried and put away. If you refuse to do it, the authorities will make you do it.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
Part of human development is your environment, and human beings will generally accept their birthright. Some Native American civilizations were autonomous, and rarely fought wars. Karl Marx was influenced heavily by anarchism, and syndicalism and socialism are very similar. I'm not talking about the republicans, I'm talking about the anarcho-syndicalists, who were only defeated because they were up against the axis. "The rule of the spoon" doesn't really apply here.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
ALL groups of humans have someone at the top, wheather it is a tribe or a nation. And rules are needed. To deny that fact is to deny human society. The rule of the spoon applys everywhere you have human beings in a community.
watch?v=4gD9RZyb_6Y
Watch, listen and learn.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
Human beings existed long before any form of government, and many early humans were independent. The CNT had no leaders, and the Zapatistas have no leader. Community organization doesn't need hierarchy to sustain itself, all it needs is cooperation. Human beings have a basic understanding of right and wrong, and should live by ideals, not the law. "The rule of the spoon" doesn't apply when there's no one on top. Those who believe it's necessary to wash, dry, and put away "the spoon" will do so.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
Humans in groups always have a leader, it goes back to our origins in ape communities, with the 'Alpha Male'. And you don't seem to understand the importance of rules in human communities, rules have to be enforced, and the rule of the spoon extends across the whole group, and both sexes. BTW FWIW I am as old as Nick.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
Humans in groups don't have to have a leader, the CNT proved it, the Zapatistas are proving it, the thousands of autonomous affinity groups and organizations are proving it. Obviously, there is something that divides us from ape ancestors, years of evolution. Humans have morals, a basic understanding of right from wrong, and should morally govern themselves. We as humans have the ability to defy the idea of authority, the idea of government, and the idea of control in general.
PunkSkaOi 3 years ago
Nonsense, you get any group of humans together, and some will naturally become the head of that group. Evolution is embedded into our genes, and how we react in a group, in that their will naturally be members of the group will will become the head of the group. You can defy the authorities all you like, but you won't achieve anything. All that street protest in the videos didn't change a single item in the US governments agenda.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
The labels bought at 'second hand stores' or even in flea markets, as still the symbols of the companies these wannabe's want to bring down.
Puzzoozoo 3 years ago
FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!
theman472 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC
You'll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is
AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!!
Go to this website...
frexis.*com/PCTV17.html
(DELETE the *)
check it out................its cool, i've got it myself.
ppiuaaaad 3 years ago
"llevo en el alma un camino
Destinado a nunca llegar"
We will never reach peace.
MrMestophiles 3 years ago
"Let them march all they want, as long as they continue to pay their taxes" -Secretary of State Alexander Hiag
Nonviolence is wonderful in concept, but in modern capitalist society run by continuous violence, or the threat of violence, completely impracticle.
AntihumannaturE91 3 years ago
When was the last time a revolution was successful due to obeying the law?
Drakul1234 3 years ago
I agree with the similarities but we can not rise to their level of violence. Not yet anyways. A violent Revolution only follows a defeated peaceful one. We still have the chance to succeed in this war on humanity. We must do it without violence. (please don't trash my comment, I would rather have a civil discussion)
Organjic 3 years ago
I'm for your cause. BUT YOUR GOING ABOUT THIS ALL WRONG. If us use vandalism and vilence then u give them the right to arrest u, and u SHOULD be arrested. And if u insist on doing it then stop crying i'm inocent and police brutality when it happens. because u deserved it.
josephmccolley 3 years ago
They're not hurting anyone.
The only people I see hurting other human beings are the cops.
KenCat1337 3 years ago
Ya, lets blame the cops. The cops coundn't possably missinformed and brainwashed as has been said multiple times. They clearly just have a true hatred for freedom. The cop was clearly just trying to maintain order. if people weren't slicing tires and dragging trash cans into the street maybe there would be less misconseptions about your or there or our organizations. maybe they'd listen to us instead of just saying "crazy anarchists"
josephmccolley 3 years ago
You don't believe in self-defense?
WoodPip 3 years ago
I do believe in self-defense. But i'm pretty sure that if i dig down deep into ur statement i see a refrence into something in the video. What self-defense do u speak of?
josephmccolley 3 years ago
so its okay for them to inflict violence on us, but its wrong when we inflict violence on them and/or objects? That makes sense I guess. Police and property are superior to the rest of us. I'd much rather have my face smashed in then defend myself.
Drakul1234 3 years ago
ya see, now u understand. i couldn't possably be infering that two wrongs don't make a right, so u picked out my point and said it exactly as i ment it. aaa i do love sarcasm. not as if there was any here of cource.
josephmccolley 3 years ago
Occupation, solidarity, refusal to submit are all core to non-violence. Occupation, solidarity and refusal to submit are all core to Black Bloc protest methods too. Non-violence isn't about marching in the street, holding signs and chanting slogans. It's about absolute non-cooperation with forces you disagree with. I'd put more faith in the success of a Black Bloc protest than in any government sanctioned protest armed with empty signs and slogans.
¡Viva Anarquia!
themutualobserver 3 years ago
probably the most clear minded analysis.
mikezephyr 3 years ago
All this talk of Gandhi... I wonder if those who espouse Gandhi's theory of non-violent protest would actually follow it through to its very end. Would you hold your ground without responding whilst police beat you? Would you maintain solidarity by absolute refusal to move in the face of massive violent oppression? Could you stand in front of a military tank like the kid in Tiahnamen Square? That's non-violent protest. But I doubt any of these people would have the balls to do so.
themutualobserver 3 years ago
pacifism is not courage.
pacifism is pathology.
your reductio ad absurdum of gandhi's non-violent protest shows us how laughable his holier-than-thou spiritual snobbery really is.
ps black bloc ftw!
mikezephyr 3 years ago
i'm not sure if i follow your response. I'm not a pacifist by any means. But I'm sick of people aligning Gandhi with meanless 'pacifist' (or more the point, placid) marches.
Gandhi's methods were courageous but as are those who fight back when hit by State violence. People who use Gandhi as an excuse not to fight shouldn't be involved in the fight in the first place.
themutualobserver 3 years ago
Peaceful protesters don't wear scarfs over their faces. Gandhi never did. Only violent people (terrorists, armed robbers) try to hide their identity.
NotAshamed2bWhite 3 years ago
Your just jealous, because your klan hoods look extra dorky.
necronomicjustice 3 years ago
You're right about terrorists hiding their identity look at the elitists that run the world.
Passenger87 3 years ago
It's funny you say only violent people try to hide their identity... do you find it interesting that the cops all hide their faces behind identical riot helmets? Find a single cop in the midst of a riot... then try to find him again five minutes later. Blue bloc anyone? Makes it difficult to file a police brutality claim...
IrishDroog 3 years ago
IrishDroog is a gov agent,u sneaky little troll
DanaDurnford 3 years ago
You're right. I am. I'm tracking your movements right now...in fact, I'm right outside your window watching you masturbate to foot fetish porn.
IrishDroog 3 years ago
Zionist sponsored Black Block (just like Black Blocks elsewhere G8 f.e.) in action, to justify violence against protesters...
jackp6 3 years ago
There is no "k" on the end of bloc, dumbass.
necronomicjustice 3 years ago
I do it in Dutch, my motherlanguage, the next time...:)
jackp6 3 years ago
The people who are causing damage are doing exactly want the powers that be want. They make protesters look like asses. I know everyone is angry but you'd make a bigger better point if you'd listen to Ghandi. No violence. Arn't you producing what you are against? Big Thanx to all of the brave press at the protests!!! Peace n One love
TheWeatherMan2012 3 years ago
I'm afraid non-violence isn't going to work this time. We've let push come to shove for too long.
SupremeMaggot 3 years ago 3
I'm sure the media will show violent protesters. This is what they want to portray and it was just given to them. Seeing police beat up nonviolent protesters is a bigger message and would be shown by the media eventually but they prefer the violence to discredit the protest. They got what they wanted. I hope I'm wrong and I won't find out cause I don't watch tv. Do what you want tho. Violence creates violence. If you want to live in a violent world then be violent. Peace creates peace.
TheWeatherMan2012 3 years ago
Don't get me wrong; we don't want to be violent. It's just that more often the police will try to antagonize the protesters in an attempt to make the protesters (both violent and non-violent) look bad.
SupremeMaggot 3 years ago 2
Non violence like Ghandi's works against an enemy that can be shamed.
Take a look at how Ghandi handled issues with Packistan before you extoll him as a non violence at all times kinda cat.
Sammaelhain 3 years ago
I know of no activist, revolutionary, or theorist relevant to the movement today who advocates only the use of violent tactics and opposes any usage of tactics that could not be called violent. We are advocates of a diversity of tactics, meaning effective combinations drawn from a full range of tactics that might lead to liberation
from all the components of this oppressive system: white supremacy, patriarchy, capitalism, and the state.
griffjam 3 years ago
We also tend to believe that means are reflected in the ends, and would not want to act in a way that invariably would lead to dictatorship or some other form of society that does not respect life and freedom. As such, we can more accurately be described as proponents of revolutionary or militant activism than as proponents of violence.
griffjam 3 years ago
Nice vid, there's some killer footage in there. I'm glad to see the Black Bloc is still armed and ready, I was afraid they'd faded into obscurity the last few years.
IrishDroog 3 years ago 3
black bloc is a tactic not a group
griffjam 3 years ago
Yes, I know that. I was simply referring to participants of black blocs in general.
IrishDroog 3 years ago
none of this shit got news coverage WTF!!
lordblazer 3 years ago 3
Actually there were some news reports about the bloc fucking shit up. Didn't make headlines but there's been several articles about it on yahoo.
IrishDroog 3 years ago
Amendment 2a
Preserves the right to keep and bear cameras.
Also suspended.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago 4
Stimulator (571 whatever!)
You're a hero.
Thanks. Pls don't quit.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago 5
Needs more chaos.
wize11 3 years ago
STOP SPENDING MONEY!
you f*cking retards are funding your own slavery, while you sit and bitch.
dnHooligan 3 years ago 4
Consumer strike...f;sure.
madebutante 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wanna PLAY BALL.. USA180 (Google it)
JesusofZion 3 years ago
The MSM is 5 corporations all ruled by Zionist Jesuit NWO Vatican & Rothschild owed by Zionist Jesuit G.E., Time Warner, Walt Disney, News Corp, & CBS. Break them up with the
Sherman Antitrust Law & Clayton Acts. If our US Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches weren't Bilderberg and CFR owned they could enforce our laws. Oh! their buying their way out of chaos. We're coming for you 1st TRAITORS of We the People, Bill of Rights, and US Constitution.
Cancel Your TV feed & WAKE UP.
I did
pork4allah 3 years ago
,___,
[O.o]
/)__)
-"--"-
☆☆☆☆☆
rudymontes1 3 years ago 2
Land of the Morns, home of the slaves
Democrats08 3 years ago
What is this supposed to mean? Are you calling these folks slaves? Morons? Please state your case, or is your name - Demo08 - all we need know about your stance?
Democracy requires tolerance of all political beliefs - you know, the Rodney thang: Can't we call get along. Name calling, if that is what was attempted, has no place in our pursuit of democracy.
Unless you're an undemocratic Democrat. The Dem. Party itself WON'T OPEN THE DEBATES and allow other points of view. That's NOT democracy.
madebutante 3 years ago
democracy is mob rule. f*ck democracy. (especially the faux-democracy we are currently living under)
we live in a constitutional republic, where our rights CANNOT be taken away. believing that we live in a democracy is EXACTLY the reason that the govt can take our rights away.
dnHooligan 3 years ago 2
We live in a democratic Republic. And, Yes, If I can Have the Constitution in it's fulness, I'll take 1st Amendment rights.
Wake up- GITMO! Our lawyers have to fight to restore habeus corpus, dorkus.
madebutante 3 years ago