In the math realm, there are objects which have infinite surface areas even though their volume is finite. Consider the 3rd dimension as curved upon itself to become virtually infinite, like how a sphere's surface is infinite in a sense. If a orthogonal vector is drawn from the surface of a sphere, you will get different relative angles depending on your vectors starting point. Perhaps a line drawn orthogonally to the 3rd dimension is relative to one's position.
Why not points on the Tesseract chain. The fourth dimension changes a point goes through in a fold cycle. All seem very fractal to me. If all matter a contortion point in the flip it makes sense that we view things in stagnate motion with us. While things farther away are in different stages of the cyclical folding cycle. and if this all makes sense than the second dimension you have to be well point couldn't perceive only going into directions because it intersects with three lines? This is fun
is perhaps the eleventh dimension the 'heaven' mentioned in the bible? what if the fallen angels constructed dimensions from the tenth to the third, after God threw them out of the eleventh dimension? (they may have been floating around in void space until they decided to engineer these dimensions)
anti matter is matter with opposite subatomic components. ie. electron-positron, proton-anti proton, neutron-anti neutron. when they come into contact they cancel each other out and are converted to energy (x-rays and gamma rays.)
The ending of time is the beginning of time... If anti matter is moving back in time, then when it hits 0 matter becomes antimatter and the clock ticks down again. Holy shit. I just blew my own mind.
@travb35 Sounds interesting. In the Book Of Enoch he writes that the 3rd Heaven, angels took him there, where they control 'time'...todays scientist say the 4th dimension is 'time', so I found that interesting. Also I've heard PerryStone/JackVanImpe n others says 'UFOs' r 'fallen angels perhaps' that come from another dimension (which explains how UFO's r able to move they way they do), Enoch talks about some angels in 'craft that fly'..so its very interesting. U could b right 2..its all amazing
@year2044 I believe that fallen angels are powerful spirits and so are able to take on any form they want, and 'ufo's' are one of them!(UFO's can also be craft engineered in secret by the government that the nazi's initially designed) I'm not a religious person - my view is that the occulist elite(government) authored our religions as mind control-which mostly aren't true-but a few truths are in there cont...
@travb35 from the occult books they use e.g. fallen angels(who they secretly worship)are in there - also all kinds of mind bogglng scientific stuff is in them and if I remember correctly Chris Everard said that modern science comes from the Jewish Kabbala and Goetia-one last thing - these books are very dangerous to your soul - I won't read them! I just know some facts from Chris Everards documentaries!
@travb35 Well, im not that much of a conspiracy person but I wont completely dismiss what you say, its very possible. I am a believer in God & so I would differ. I put nothing past HumanBeings (that have any power), humans r the most dangerous & most evil of anything on earth, so u could b right. But I think you would like the Book Of Enoch & reading the final book of the bible 'Revelation' its right up your alley I believe & very interesting.
@year2044 I believe in God too - but I just believe that religion is not the actual proper truth - what the bible does contain though is basic truth about the existence of God and angels both good and bad - and the existence of good and evil. I was a christian once - now my only interest in the bible is learning what it's text is actually about for real(decoding it)
@travb35 Yeah, I can see where ur coming from & Im a lot the same way u r in that type of thinking, I dont ever say im a 'christian' but I believe Im attempting to be a 'follower of christ'. The 'Bible Codes' have always fasinated me & the BEST of the BEST on BibleCodes is ChuckMissler where he says in Genesis one verse talks about trees but using the bible code over 20tree's are NAMED in that one verse/paragraph. If true, its truly amazing & would mean the code is REAL, I hope it is real
@year2044 I'm personally not a follower of christ(a royal title:king) since I don't believe any human was ever God. There are videos about the torah codes(old testament), I believe jewish occultists authored the torah/old testament - numerology is part of the occult(secret knowledge) I think they had sophisticated occult methods of hiding secret information within these texts - I don't believe God put the information in there!
@travb35 I was reading torah text recently about their messiah(another royal title meaning king!) yehoshua, which said he is the sun! of righteousness - lots of people say that the bible is secretly pagan sun worship - this text confirms it! and this is the real jewish torah - not the badly translated english rehash we have called the old testament!
@travb35 Thats where I disagree, IF the codes r 'real', no human could have done it without very modern technology (computers), other wise I would think it would take thousands of top thinking Jews about a thousand yrs to write the Torah with those secret codes, so IF they r real GOD placed them there OR we have some very signifigant 'lost human history' (Genesis says God 'RE-plenished the earth' not 'plenished the earth') which could mean there is a lost history 'nothing is new under the sun'
@travb35 Watch 'Chuck Missler Kabbalah Session 02' at the 20minute mark it shows that using the bible code, about 30 trees are all named in that one short paragraph. NOW, if thats real..then without a shadow of a doubt, the codes have got to be right!
So Physicists somewhat correct in assuming that what we do in the past is essentially recorded history in spacetime. As if the information that happens is virtually recorded as it is happening. So THIS is why we there is no certainty when trying to figure out where a particle was in spacetime, because once it is seen by a viewer it becomes recorded history IN spacetime and once that particle moves on we will never know where it is because we would have to record it at another...(brain explode)
i know because i desgined ,turned on , programed in my own language a quantum computer that holds the original time span the rest of this matrix is based on , MY name is JON^ ,.. I am a master creator,.. how are you today.
wait till i tell you how you can be anything or anybody in any universe at atany timne while doing it all as it pulses with karma,thats called being a god,.. you are half god half man, you CAN still create multiverses that are real and usable
Don't the effects of relativity, e.g. Lorentz contraction, demonstrate that the 4th dimension is not entirely orthogonal to the first 3 spatial dimensions?
@SherwinGooch your over thinking it,.. concider this,.. God doesnt measure things like man does,.. he creats it,knows it , feels it,.. understands why a keyboard loves to be typed on in the heat of a debate, or how liquid mem holds all of the multiverse, and multicosmos at the same time and live as you wish forever and do it before you even type a reply to me,.. thats how a master creator creats and thinks, try it out for yourself. ill watch
Why do we travel forward in duration and at the speed we do though? I always imagine a 3D being to be stuck in a frame forever and a 4D being to exist in all 3D frames simultaneously. Is there a grey area between dimensions (like the way you said that "points" can be different sizes up to taking up the largest possible space in a dimension) or is this something completely unrelated?
Wait, so if i was living in the 4th dimension would i be able to see the many different states that an object has encompassed overtime?. But this line/duration is blurred because when I see this object in question I could change its state. Then overall alter its line which would ultimately change its perception in regards to space-time?. Or do i have it all wrong?
@Zk1f3r Think of it as You ARE in the fourth dimension! I mean you really are living and changing with time so that erases the "If i was living in the 4th dimension" statement. . . . . .
I keep encountering answers to my comments in previous videos within the next one I watch, so I apologize in advance if this pattern holds true onto the next. My question is: Which dimension came first? Is there even a sequential manifestation, either lower toward higher or higher to lower, or was it simultaneous? They are interconnected, but the lower seem independent of the higher, or at least COULD be. It's amazing that we have such complex reality from what I think is binary origins.
In the fourth dimension, you can measure by time as in the 3rd you measure by width, so wouldn't it be like existing in all moments of your life at the same moment?
(continued) shot out of the big bang in a different point, like how venus rotates backwards, but still around the sun the same way, matter/antimatter are going in different directions in time, but still going in the universe on the same time.
like, the big bang exploded, and then it exploded, and then it exploded again, repeat times infinite, in on itself, then the antimatter would be matter that was shot out from a different point, say, the end of the universe.
theory: if the big bang happened so fast it was faster than light, and it made antimatter and matter,and antimatter is going backwards in time of its own yet in ours its the same, is it possible that the antimatter is matter, but shot into the other end of the time sequence? like, if all matter runs the same way, and comes from the big bang, it could be said the bang boomed time into existence in our universe and all matter came of this starting point, then antimatter could be matter shot out
yay thank you for addressing the problem with the spime concept!. This idea that we are physical individuals doesn't make sense through time since our atoms and energies are gathered from the world, exchanged and finally released. There's nothing individual about our bodies except that it's the flavor of the planck week.
@ydamoydamo Each dimension is a subset of the next, and each dimension is infinite. This is the same concept as thinking of the number series starting 0,2,4,6... and the number series 0,1,2,3,4... - each head towards infinity, and yet one is a subset of the other.
What's "before" and "after" the universe? A return to the underlying symmetry state. Our universe or any other arises from a breaking of that symmetry.
@ydamoydamo Conceptually, I think it is easier to understand something with a beginning that might never end, than it is to imagine something without a beginning. It's difficult to place certitude upon much when we start encountering infinity, even in potential. Does the universe have to end? Is there evidence? Is this one's end the beginning again? Infinite finites are still infinite. Right?
I have a question about your description of how the dimensions interact, if 4D is time, then isn't it possible to have the first, second, or even zero dimensions with time but without the other dimensions? Duration can be applied to anything, not just 3D space.
@Thatguywiththelaptop Yes! As I've said many times with this project, for our imaginary 2D flatlanders, time wold be a direction in the third dimension, and so on.
I think cognition is an abillety we have obtained which give us a poor version of free will while thought and will go on impulsevly. It's operations ithin the universe. So free will can be engaged and is by conditions of enviroment and other properties of us triggered to be engaged. Free will is not our default operation. The outcome of the three comes from the synergy from the three but free will and determinism coexist. That's what I think.
Cont. Time - beat and imaginary invention of increasing system (calendar) with which we keep track how the universe was alined. Or a distorted verion. But that's not how we think. We think smaller and get illusional. The illusion of time.
The fourth dimention - operation/change within the three dimentions of time is set by the properties and their functions of the universe, within the infinite, eternal four dimentions. Present time would be the configuration of all properties within the universe together simotaniously something observes it and think: this is present time. Leading to the illusin that there is time and it's linear.
these vids are great. but you move too quick and assume just a bit too much knowledge is present in your viewers. i appreciate that sentiment, but would like a primer on terms like "Planck time" and other terms contained within these vids so i can keep up. also, you ought to take a breath and let the audience's mind linger for a moment on points you make before you speedily rush on to the next point. how was i supposed to read all those sentences scrolling by defining the 11 dimensions?
I can't imagine an instructor on the same subject talking this quick at a university. Ken Burns says, "meaning accrues though duration" make fewer points but make them in a BIGGER way by taking longer to make them.
Time exists within the second dimension, because an object can move toward or away from another creation a line, this takes time to move in and out! I am thinking, time is just a perceived notion for an observer to calculate motion, and distance, if you are away from something it naturally takes a certain amount of time to go toward it, but an inanimate object has no time!
@rossschcheese I'm having trouble with this concept, because how can in inanimate object perceive time? Time is only in the reference frame of a being that observes itself as being separate from the universe. This allows the human to perceive time, because there things that are moving around us! How can a non subjective universe have time?
@TerminalEternal Even if you cannot perceive time, it is still happening. Likewise, an object not moving cannot perceive time, but time is occurring nonetheless. Also, remember when Rob mentioned in the video that 3 dimensional space cannot be seen without the fourth dimension. that's because it takes time for the speed of light to reach our eyes, a path moving in the fourth dimension of time, or what he calls duration. Your subjective universe needs light to exist, which takes time.
@rossschcheese three objects in relation to eachother can never achieve three dimensions, they would only be in a flat plain, by adding an observer you instantly get a fourth dimenison that can move between the center of the three objects, that is when free will is created! With three objects they can only move away from one, and toward another, or all move away from each other!
@rossschcheese because relative to each object there nothing is changing, only the space between the objects is getting longer! space is expanding but those objects havent experienced time! Time would be a flawed definition! In my opinion relative to each object there is no time passing!
@TerminalEternal if object a is spinning around object b, then object b is also spinning around object a, and neither object is really spinning at all, but the imagined space around them is the only thing that is changing@!
@TerminalEternal arite, i gotcha. but thats a totally different theory. the theory im talking about how time only exists to us this is because we can only see three dimension, when in fact their is four.
Rob, you've done it again! I've read the book twice and integrated most of the ideas into my personal cosmology. But, it is SO helpful to have additional mental tools for trying to conceptualize the inconceivable. So far this series of vlogs has provided these in abundance. Thank you, kind sir. Looking forward to 5D!
Dude, i just.. duuude, i watch your ummm presentations from time t otime and i still cannot get less astouned of how.. fuking pretty genius you are - with the way you inspire.
I recently encountered this strategic PC game, where players can not only view future and past events, but also issue orders in different timelines, and even chronoport their armies through time.
Here's a review I found:
youtube : /watch?v=GcZbpL6ueM8
Thumbs up if you like it!
I wish there was more such mind-exercising material out there - such as what you put out on this channel, but also games and other things, and preferably not just wargames ;-)
Rob, if you are going to do a new video on the 5D, please talk slower and allow for some pauses so the viewer can digest a thing or two. I don't want to be terrorized out of my wits by mind-blowing concepts like quantum entanglement, causality, and anti-matter moving backwards in time (duration) :)
@mskitty12311 What I do when that happens, I put pause, digest, and then continue listening. I'm not an astronomer like my hubby so I have to really put some thought into things people can barely wrap their minds around.
I do pause, but very often the video 'sticks' and won't allow me to pause it, and so I must watch the entire video through, then watch it again. I often find, still, that there's so much information involved in one video, I wish Rob would talk slower and pause a bit. Anyway I guess he can't accommodate all his videos to me lolll
Nice video, until he got to the 'free will' part. I suppose Rob wants so say that with free will, each decision makes a person travel into different parts of the fifth dimension - but then again, in other universes (or 4D Points) we made other choices, right? I don't see how that is free will, as we are constantly making ALL the choices we can possibly make.
My husband is an astronomer and is less "platonic" than I. I on the other hand am so intrigued with time. It is ashame that my enthusiasm for it is nowhere in the vicinity of comprehending it in the least. But I keep searching for this implaccable truth in videos, books..my bible. One day I just asked knew this as truth: God knows what I am doing and thinking NOW. He also knows what someone is doing/thinking in China...and what is going on with some star. ONLY if he is in ALL dimensions.
Your videos are great and complex. I know you have said previously that you are not a physicist and also that you have no intentions to become one, but I have to say that you would be a great one if you wished to. Anyway you are already what you not intend to be. Congratulations!
Basically I understand this one about the 4D. I don't know if this can be explained, but I don't quite get what Rob means by imagining that each next dimension is at right angles to the one before it. I don't understand what right angles has to do with it.
I gather the right angle is derived from the 1° (or arcdegree) of a 360° circle (wiki) (which looks like it would be 90° of the circle, but they call it 1 arcdegree), whereby a little half-square is created at the intersecting points.
If we could see the fourth dimension, would we see where we are going to go before we go there? If so, doesn't that deny Free Will? Maybe we can see all future paths? Or maybe we can only see where we've been, and not where we're going?
@neonical Is it like watching an old movie you know by heart? Just because we know what the characaters are going to do does not mean anyone's will was denied. I don't know... I try to understand it myself....
this is a nice standard model theory. unfortunately it has nothing to do with reality. you cannot have something which doesnt exist. namely the imaginary 0 dimension point first dimension 1 or 2nd dimension plane come together to create something real. Instead you need to learn about a much more ancient and modern theory of singularity which Nassim Haramein correctly describes. Good luck in resolving your confusion.
@godseyeview Yeah, that was pretty eye-opening. Another paper that references these concepts "Hadrons as Kerr-Newman Black Holes" , written by Robert Oldershaw in 2006 was published in the March, 2010 Journal of Cosmology.
The ancient philosophers discussed the nature of the Universe long, long ago, upon which modern Science was built upon. Rob is hardly discussing some 'nice standard model theory'.
Nassim Haramein talks about Sacred Geometry. This field goes back to the ancients also.
It looks to me both modern Science AND Sacred Geometry somehow are converging. I don't see what Rob discusses somehow occludes Sacred Geometry, as you seem to think.
@mskitty12311 actually no . Nassim Haramein asserts that we do not live in a non existent 0 1, 2, dimensions come together to make a 3rd. Logically that idea is ridiculous Instead we live in a fractal comprised of recursive black holes. namely every self replicating system surrounded by an energy field being one. which includes atoms, stars, blackholes, living organisms, planets. within the center of each blackhole contains another universe. look up rouge valley
(PART 1) Nassim Haramein at the Rogue Valley Metaphysical Library. 2003. (4 HRS)
where he begins w. a course in high school where he learned of dimensions, dot, line, cube, etc. The problem he had at the time was one of simple semantics -- he took words in an extreme logical sense. This leads to confusion with visualizing, when taking things too literally.
@mskitty12311 ok so u watched it. I mean when you are trying to model things in reality u have to take things literally. i mean u cant just go from representing imaginary ideas and then go to reality. because people suppress reality i mean suspended disbelieve but taken to science and hence reality that is why religious scientist are able to terrify any entrepreneurs in thought. what i mean is that scene within this video where only the 4th dimension is woobly. no the entire structure is.
What you fail to understand, and what Haramein as a teen-ager initially failed to understand, is that in order to explain abstract ideas, Science always must find ways to express abstract ideas in order to convey the abstraction. Probably many confuse the word 'abstract' with 'imaginary'. There is a world of difference involved with these two words, and often mere semantics, mere words themselves, can lead to incredible confusion that it would take an atomic bomb to dislodge.
My feeling is that after he understood the dimensional model as simply a starting point for visualizing the dimensions, and got passed his semantic confusion of taking a concept to mean a 'literal dot', a 'literal line', a 'literal cube', etc., he understood the beginning building blocks of the scientific model, and was able to take off from there with unified fields, sacred geometry, etc. He's o.k., more of a 'pop physicist' sort of thing, and interesting in his way.
@mskitty12311 actually he is not a pop physicist but more like a modern day Copernican revolution. what i mean is before the solar centric model of the orbits it was earth centric. I mean any model of reality can be a starting point but as if you very off base the maths get very confusing. case is a earth centric model there is alot of complicated retrograde motion of concentric orbits. same with the standard model. the unexplained strong force and dark matter are some examples.
If you mean to say Haramein is at the forefront of a Copernican revolution, I'd have to ask you to post a link to his curriculum vita, his list of refereed publications, & list of conferences attended, titles of talks & invited talks, w. links to the conference websites that show scope of conference w. list of attendees. Not that i have anything against Haramein, but my bet is such a curriculum vita of his does not exist online.
My point being, that Science has evolved away from the geocentric or earth-centered model (the Copernican model) of the Universe, but Haramein is not the originator of ideas like the unified field theory, quantum physics, chaos theory, etc., as you seem to imply he that he is. Haramein, as a kind of 'pop physicist' simply gives his take on all these new theories (from what I can see from his videos).
@mskitty12311 i did not imply he is the originator of quantum physics, chaos theory, etc. what i am saying though is that he has created a unified field theory which brings together relativity, quantum physics, chaos theory under one recursive self replicating automaton. He explains everything with one principle and hence simplifies our understanding of reality much like Copernicus with his solar centric model of orbits. He covers consciousness, charge, mass, things the standard model fails.
I have only your word, and his, to take on this. I've never seen Haramein's name come up in the scientific literature, and I certainly did my share of typing up higher math and physics manuscripts for publication over the years. I could ask my ex-boss's opinion on Haramein's Schwarzschild Proton (if that's the grand unified field theory), but I'm almost certain he would peruse it and give it a snort, and say it's 'pop physics' or something. Does Haramein have a C.V. online?
Just a question, so anti matter is considered anti time, i guess that would mean it would speed time up. When we have objects of large mass like a sun or a black hole time is slowed down, does this mean with large amounts of anti-matter time would be sped up?
This is so odd, I spent a majority of my YT browsing yesterday looking for 4D explanation videos and was sorely disappointed I could find nothing of your Rob. Then you bring forth this gem, it's like you are a mind reader. In short, thank you and glad to see you posting again.
Thanks Rob. This new series which explains the concepts of the tenth dimension in depth more is fantastic! It really makes me think about how the dimensions are all interconnected and that just calling the fourth dimension "time" is too simplistic - points in higher dimensions encompass the whole of the dimensions below it (I think?). Looking forward to the rest and if you're gonna convince me that I have free will!
Yes, as I read it takes 8 light minutes. Well, I guess its original light from 4.6 billion years ago has since swept passed the Earth long ago, and the light from the Sun is newly created from inside the Sun, which the Earth receives in the 'past' on an 8 light minute delay. This is getting way too heavy for me.
@mskitty12311 when we look at light coming from the sun, yes we are essentially looking 8 minutes into the past. now account for the light that is coming in from billions of light years away, and essentially we are looking billions of years into the past, all the way up until the big bang.
Do you mean light coming in from other galaxies? Yes, it's mind-boggling. I am not sure, though, that all astronomers have agreed on a big bang singularity ("theories of the origin of the primordial state remain very speculative"-wiki)
"It is not known if something existed before the singularity that we call Big Bang, nor if time is linear, since the expansion estimated by Hubble's law assumed a linear expansion, and later work indicates there may have been variations. "
This confuses me no end what they mean work indicating time may not always be linear. I don't know what they mean by that.
@mskitty12311 Remember that a light year is a measurement of distance. The light from that star takes 10 light years to reach us on earth, so no, the crew would not be going back in time. What you're thinking about is time-dialation that explains how time isn't always the same for people travelling at different speeds, but that has nothing to do with this.
On your second thought: Like I said, we se the light from a star that was emitted an x number of years ago where x is the distance in ly.
I had to google what a right angle looks like |_ , and find it measures 90 degrees.
As fascinating as that information is, I always wondered where do they get the degrees from? It appears to be from the circle, always described as having 360 degrees. Why 360 degrees?
"The original motivation for choosing the degree as a unit of rotations and angles is unknown. One theory states that it is related to the fact that 360 is approximately the number of days in a year. Ancient astronomers noticed that the stars in the sky, which circle the celestial pole every day, seem to advance in that circle by approximately one-360th of a circle, i.e., one degree, each day.
An alternative theory is that the degree is 1/16 of the angle of an equilateral triangle. The earliest trigonometry, used by the Babylonian astronomers and their Greek successors, was based on chords of a circle. A chord of length equal to the radius made a natural base quantity. One sixtieth of this, using their standard sexagesimal divisions, was a degree. "
So it all goes back to the ancient astronomers, Babylonians, and Greeks. Fascinating.
But I don't understand why it states "The original motivation for choosing the degree as a unit of rotations and angles is unknown" and why they then give 'theories' -- when obviously enough the earliest known ancient astronomers (i.e. Mayans, Egyptians etc.), Babylonians, and Greeks basically all came up with the idea of choosing 360 degrees and their reason for it -- observation of the heavens. What other 'original motivation' could be meant by that statement?
@mskitty12311 Hmmm not sure if its relevant but I do know that ancient astronomers both in the west and in the east divided the night sky into 12 quadrants ( a number divisible into 360), perhaps the number 12 had some significance to them?
Personally I've always loved Astrology and find it has a lot of truth to it. In ancient times, if I'm not mistaken, the astrologers *were* the astronomers to begin with.
Maybe you are right. The 'unknown' 'original motivation' might be a side-stepping of the ancient astrologers by not giving them the credit for the original observations of the heavens. Perhaps the wiki writer should have said "Ancient astronomers [ASTROLOGERS] noticed that the stars in the sky..."
@Nerfherder3 Twelve spokes, one wheel, navels three. Who can comprehend this?
On it are placed together three hundred and sixty like pegs. They shake not in the least. — Dirghatamas , Rigveda 1.164.48
There is definitely a mystique about the number 12. It appears all over both the Old and New Testament also. Some say Sacred Geometry is encoded in both.
Might have heard of Atomism, not sure. I'll google it: " Atomism (from ancient Greek atomos, meaning "uncuttable") is a natural philosophy that developed in several ancient traditions. The atomists theorized that the natural world consists of two fundamental parts: indivisible atoms and empty void."
They were pretty ADVANCED if you ask me !
It's fascinating to learn its ancient roots, the names of the ancients & all.
I have a question: Is there really such a thing as "now", since everything we see around us actually is from the past (whether it be a few nanoseconds ago or 10 years ago)?
I study law and I thank you because I admire and love physics and this is an outstanding way to feed that admiration even being in another completely different field.
It's weird how, when I look at " '3-cube a 'cube' " I don't actually see the cube, but see a dome-like structure as from above. But a refocusing of the eye, I can then see the cube clearly. That's really weird.
If i can change the duration, will i feel like that running an easy marathon with 2 hours, while normal runners put so much effort like 4 hours plus?
htunix7 1 week ago
In the math realm, there are objects which have infinite surface areas even though their volume is finite. Consider the 3rd dimension as curved upon itself to become virtually infinite, like how a sphere's surface is infinite in a sense. If a orthogonal vector is drawn from the surface of a sphere, you will get different relative angles depending on your vectors starting point. Perhaps a line drawn orthogonally to the 3rd dimension is relative to one's position.
burchified 1 week ago
Nothing is infinite, since you eventually must arrive at the minimum unit of space/time possible.
humbertojimmy 1 week ago
Why not points on the Tesseract chain. The fourth dimension changes a point goes through in a fold cycle. All seem very fractal to me. If all matter a contortion point in the flip it makes sense that we view things in stagnate motion with us. While things farther away are in different stages of the cyclical folding cycle. and if this all makes sense than the second dimension you have to be well point couldn't perceive only going into directions because it intersects with three lines? This is fun
Teddy143Fresa 2 weeks ago
you could have at least told us WHY theres so many trucks
missionron 2 weeks ago in playlist Educational
umm 0k i still dnt understand wtf u saying.. sigh
mrseximix 2 weeks ago
Coolest fact I learnt from this video: We are all FREKING RAINBOWS!
TheEpicQuestOfBob 3 weeks ago
@travb35
Piss off. This is a scientific video, not some biblical crap.
TheEpicQuestOfBob 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is perhaps the eleventh dimension the 'heaven' mentioned in the bible? what if the fallen angels constructed dimensions from the tenth to the third, after God threw them out of the eleventh dimension? (they may have been floating around in void space until they decided to engineer these dimensions)
travb35 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
travb35 3 weeks ago
Time IS a dimention with the two directions being "into the past" and "into the futre"
euducationator 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Huh?
letsgodo 1 month ago
anti matter is matter with opposite subatomic components. ie. electron-positron, proton-anti proton, neutron-anti neutron. when they come into contact they cancel each other out and are converted to energy (x-rays and gamma rays.)
kumili727 1 month ago
The ending of time is the beginning of time... If anti matter is moving back in time, then when it hits 0 matter becomes antimatter and the clock ticks down again. Holy shit. I just blew my own mind.
woody0900 1 month ago
@woody0900 That's pretty insane. I love these videos.
MysticalSelah 1 month ago
I found this after reading the Book Of Enoch, he writes 4000yrs ago that God/Angels/spirts/ghost took him to the 3rd heaven...
year2044 1 month ago
@year2044 I think that the fourth dimension is run by the fallen angels - keeping us trapped in the third dimension!
travb35 3 weeks ago
@travb35 Sounds interesting. In the Book Of Enoch he writes that the 3rd Heaven, angels took him there, where they control 'time'...todays scientist say the 4th dimension is 'time', so I found that interesting. Also I've heard PerryStone/JackVanImpe n others says 'UFOs' r 'fallen angels perhaps' that come from another dimension (which explains how UFO's r able to move they way they do), Enoch talks about some angels in 'craft that fly'..so its very interesting. U could b right 2..its all amazing
year2044 3 weeks ago
@year2044 I believe that fallen angels are powerful spirits and so are able to take on any form they want, and 'ufo's' are one of them!(UFO's can also be craft engineered in secret by the government that the nazi's initially designed) I'm not a religious person - my view is that the occulist elite(government) authored our religions as mind control-which mostly aren't true-but a few truths are in there cont...
travb35 3 weeks ago
@travb35 from the occult books they use e.g. fallen angels(who they secretly worship)are in there - also all kinds of mind bogglng scientific stuff is in them and if I remember correctly Chris Everard said that modern science comes from the Jewish Kabbala and Goetia-one last thing - these books are very dangerous to your soul - I won't read them! I just know some facts from Chris Everards documentaries!
travb35 3 weeks ago
@travb35 Well, im not that much of a conspiracy person but I wont completely dismiss what you say, its very possible. I am a believer in God & so I would differ. I put nothing past HumanBeings (that have any power), humans r the most dangerous & most evil of anything on earth, so u could b right. But I think you would like the Book Of Enoch & reading the final book of the bible 'Revelation' its right up your alley I believe & very interesting.
year2044 3 weeks ago
@year2044 I believe in God too - but I just believe that religion is not the actual proper truth - what the bible does contain though is basic truth about the existence of God and angels both good and bad - and the existence of good and evil. I was a christian once - now my only interest in the bible is learning what it's text is actually about for real(decoding it)
travb35 3 weeks ago
@travb35 Yeah, I can see where ur coming from & Im a lot the same way u r in that type of thinking, I dont ever say im a 'christian' but I believe Im attempting to be a 'follower of christ'. The 'Bible Codes' have always fasinated me & the BEST of the BEST on BibleCodes is ChuckMissler where he says in Genesis one verse talks about trees but using the bible code over 20tree's are NAMED in that one verse/paragraph. If true, its truly amazing & would mean the code is REAL, I hope it is real
year2044 3 weeks ago
@year2044 I'm personally not a follower of christ(a royal title:king) since I don't believe any human was ever God. There are videos about the torah codes(old testament), I believe jewish occultists authored the torah/old testament - numerology is part of the occult(secret knowledge) I think they had sophisticated occult methods of hiding secret information within these texts - I don't believe God put the information in there!
travb35 2 weeks ago
@travb35 I was reading torah text recently about their messiah(another royal title meaning king!) yehoshua, which said he is the sun! of righteousness - lots of people say that the bible is secretly pagan sun worship - this text confirms it! and this is the real jewish torah - not the badly translated english rehash we have called the old testament!
travb35 2 weeks ago
@travb35 Thats where I disagree, IF the codes r 'real', no human could have done it without very modern technology (computers), other wise I would think it would take thousands of top thinking Jews about a thousand yrs to write the Torah with those secret codes, so IF they r real GOD placed them there OR we have some very signifigant 'lost human history' (Genesis says God 'RE-plenished the earth' not 'plenished the earth') which could mean there is a lost history 'nothing is new under the sun'
year2044 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
travb35 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@year2044 yep I'm not sure if the codes are real either, but if they are - don't underestimate what could be achieved with occult sciences!
travb35 2 weeks ago
@travb35 Watch 'Chuck Missler Kabbalah Session 02' at the 20minute mark it shows that using the bible code, about 30 trees are all named in that one short paragraph. NOW, if thats real..then without a shadow of a doubt, the codes have got to be right!
year2044 2 weeks ago
VERY COOL!!
MediumNothinFull 1 month ago
CANT WE MAKE A COMPUTER PROGRAM !?!
MediumNothinFull 1 month ago
So Physicists somewhat correct in assuming that what we do in the past is essentially recorded history in spacetime. As if the information that happens is virtually recorded as it is happening. So THIS is why we there is no certainty when trying to figure out where a particle was in spacetime, because once it is seen by a viewer it becomes recorded history IN spacetime and once that particle moves on we will never know where it is because we would have to record it at another...(brain explode)
SilentMott 1 month ago
@SilentMott Youtube, PLEASE allow for more characters :(
SilentMott 1 month ago
My question is, how can we get to the 4th dimension. Where is it located?
BehindYouSir 1 month ago
i know because i desgined ,turned on , programed in my own language a quantum computer that holds the original time span the rest of this matrix is based on , MY name is JON^ ,.. I am a master creator,.. how are you today.
MrMentalflossed 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
wait till i tell you how you can be anything or anybody in any universe at atany timne while doing it all as it pulses with karma,thats called being a god,.. you are half god half man, you CAN still create multiverses that are real and usable
MrMentalflossed 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
lost him at 1:00.. MIND FUCK
chelalo99 1 month ago
Don't the effects of relativity, e.g. Lorentz contraction, demonstrate that the 4th dimension is not entirely orthogonal to the first 3 spatial dimensions?
SherwinGooch 2 months ago
@SherwinGooch your over thinking it,.. concider this,.. God doesnt measure things like man does,.. he creats it,knows it , feels it,.. understands why a keyboard loves to be typed on in the heat of a debate, or how liquid mem holds all of the multiverse, and multicosmos at the same time and live as you wish forever and do it before you even type a reply to me,.. thats how a master creator creats and thinks, try it out for yourself. ill watch
MrMentalflossed 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
BOOM! Your mind has been blown.
jokawild555 2 months ago
Hi, Rob. Since you believe in free will can I have your opinion on what this experiment has to say about it? v=fI1624SwYnI&
You've been a good help so far in my quest to wrap my head around these concepts, keep up the good work.
GoreTuzkPT 2 months ago
Why do we travel forward in duration and at the speed we do though? I always imagine a 3D being to be stuck in a frame forever and a 4D being to exist in all 3D frames simultaneously. Is there a grey area between dimensions (like the way you said that "points" can be different sizes up to taking up the largest possible space in a dimension) or is this something completely unrelated?
yousefamar 2 months ago
1d - line
2d - plane
3d - space
4d - time
coong7777 2 months ago
Wait, so if i was living in the 4th dimension would i be able to see the many different states that an object has encompassed overtime?. But this line/duration is blurred because when I see this object in question I could change its state. Then overall alter its line which would ultimately change its perception in regards to space-time?. Or do i have it all wrong?
Zk1f3r 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Zk1f3r Think of it as You ARE in the fourth dimension! I mean you really are living and changing with time so that erases the "If i was living in the 4th dimension" statement. . . . . .
ZEYAAM898 2 months ago
Wonderfully clear thought, in it's rendering of the concept(s). Nicely done sir. A joy to view and ponder. Thank you!
sikpikfrank 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I'm finally starting to understand the intricacies of MetaPhysics & cosmology.
KhinShaider 2 months ago
Fantastic finish to the video Rob. I'd love to start a blog like this one. Cliffhanger!!! Onto the next video for me.
latenightlogic 2 months ago
The weird floating tubes in the film Donnie Darko remind me of spimes.
WormulonDCP 2 months ago
I keep encountering answers to my comments in previous videos within the next one I watch, so I apologize in advance if this pattern holds true onto the next. My question is: Which dimension came first? Is there even a sequential manifestation, either lower toward higher or higher to lower, or was it simultaneous? They are interconnected, but the lower seem independent of the higher, or at least COULD be. It's amazing that we have such complex reality from what I think is binary origins.
2ndhandsoul 2 months ago
In the fourth dimension, you can measure by time as in the 3rd you measure by width, so wouldn't it be like existing in all moments of your life at the same moment?
SumAwe69 2 months ago
(continued) shot out of the big bang in a different point, like how venus rotates backwards, but still around the sun the same way, matter/antimatter are going in different directions in time, but still going in the universe on the same time.
like, the big bang exploded, and then it exploded, and then it exploded again, repeat times infinite, in on itself, then the antimatter would be matter that was shot out from a different point, say, the end of the universe.
shoshanish 2 months ago
theory: if the big bang happened so fast it was faster than light, and it made antimatter and matter,and antimatter is going backwards in time of its own yet in ours its the same, is it possible that the antimatter is matter, but shot into the other end of the time sequence? like, if all matter runs the same way, and comes from the big bang, it could be said the bang boomed time into existence in our universe and all matter came of this starting point, then antimatter could be matter shot out
shoshanish 2 months ago
yay thank you for addressing the problem with the spime concept!. This idea that we are physical individuals doesn't make sense through time since our atoms and energies are gathered from the world, exchanged and finally released. There's nothing individual about our bodies except that it's the flavor of the planck week.
jbz3 2 months ago
Time(duration) is finite(about 150 billion years i think)...it has beggining and end...
Every dimension is infinite by your theory.
So,what is before big bang and after big crunsh?
Sorry about my bad english...
ydamoydamo 2 months ago
@ydamoydamo Each dimension is a subset of the next, and each dimension is infinite. This is the same concept as thinking of the number series starting 0,2,4,6... and the number series 0,1,2,3,4... - each head towards infinity, and yet one is a subset of the other.
What's "before" and "after" the universe? A return to the underlying symmetry state. Our universe or any other arises from a breaking of that symmetry.
watch?v=1K_MgAfeZkk
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 2 months ago
@ydamoydamo Conceptually, I think it is easier to understand something with a beginning that might never end, than it is to imagine something without a beginning. It's difficult to place certitude upon much when we start encountering infinity, even in potential. Does the universe have to end? Is there evidence? Is this one's end the beginning again? Infinite finites are still infinite. Right?
2ndhandsoul 2 months ago
Flat lander = quake live but cooler ^^
MaximusDisplay 2 months ago
Excellent video my mind is blown! Cant wait for one about the fifth dimension!
Billyvonbolgenstein 2 months ago
I have a question about your description of how the dimensions interact, if 4D is time, then isn't it possible to have the first, second, or even zero dimensions with time but without the other dimensions? Duration can be applied to anything, not just 3D space.
Thatguywiththelaptop 2 months ago
@Thatguywiththelaptop Yes! As I've said many times with this project, for our imaginary 2D flatlanders, time wold be a direction in the third dimension, and so on.
10thdim 2 months ago
I like this concept a lot, but there's one question that I've never been able to answer:
Why are we moving through this fourth dimension? Where does the energy come from that allows us to traverse this dimension?
tamsanh 3 months ago
I think cognition is an abillety we have obtained which give us a poor version of free will while thought and will go on impulsevly. It's operations ithin the universe. So free will can be engaged and is by conditions of enviroment and other properties of us triggered to be engaged. Free will is not our default operation. The outcome of the three comes from the synergy from the three but free will and determinism coexist. That's what I think.
SaerdnaOoOoo 3 months ago
Cont. Time - beat and imaginary invention of increasing system (calendar) with which we keep track how the universe was alined. Or a distorted verion. But that's not how we think. We think smaller and get illusional. The illusion of time.
SaerdnaOoOoo 3 months ago
The fourth dimention - operation/change within the three dimentions of time is set by the properties and their functions of the universe, within the infinite, eternal four dimentions. Present time would be the configuration of all properties within the universe together simotaniously something observes it and think: this is present time. Leading to the illusin that there is time and it's linear.
SaerdnaOoOoo 3 months ago
Comment removed
jekobpl 3 months ago
imagining the 5th dimension?
sgtjakass 3 months ago
these vids are great. but you move too quick and assume just a bit too much knowledge is present in your viewers. i appreciate that sentiment, but would like a primer on terms like "Planck time" and other terms contained within these vids so i can keep up. also, you ought to take a breath and let the audience's mind linger for a moment on points you make before you speedily rush on to the next point. how was i supposed to read all those sentences scrolling by defining the 11 dimensions?
derelictegrasshopper 3 months ago
I can't imagine an instructor on the same subject talking this quick at a university. Ken Burns says, "meaning accrues though duration" make fewer points but make them in a BIGGER way by taking longer to make them.
derelictegrasshopper 3 months ago
i dont understand still but this blows my mind. maybe one day.
QofLife69 3 months ago
Time exists within the second dimension, because an object can move toward or away from another creation a line, this takes time to move in and out! I am thinking, time is just a perceived notion for an observer to calculate motion, and distance, if you are away from something it naturally takes a certain amount of time to go toward it, but an inanimate object has no time!
TerminalEternal 3 months ago
@TerminalEternal time is always the dimension above the one you are on. if we lived in the second dimension, then the third dimension would be time.
rossschcheese 3 months ago
@rossschcheese I'm having trouble with this concept, because how can in inanimate object perceive time? Time is only in the reference frame of a being that observes itself as being separate from the universe. This allows the human to perceive time, because there things that are moving around us! How can a non subjective universe have time?
TerminalEternal 3 months ago
@TerminalEternal Even if you cannot perceive time, it is still happening. Likewise, an object not moving cannot perceive time, but time is occurring nonetheless. Also, remember when Rob mentioned in the video that 3 dimensional space cannot be seen without the fourth dimension. that's because it takes time for the speed of light to reach our eyes, a path moving in the fourth dimension of time, or what he calls duration. Your subjective universe needs light to exist, which takes time.
rossschcheese 3 months ago
@rossschcheese three objects in relation to eachother can never achieve three dimensions, they would only be in a flat plain, by adding an observer you instantly get a fourth dimenison that can move between the center of the three objects, that is when free will is created! With three objects they can only move away from one, and toward another, or all move away from each other!
TerminalEternal 3 months ago
@TerminalEternal how does this relate to what were discussing: i'm explaining why anything and everything has time, even if it cannot perceive it
rossschcheese 3 months ago
@rossschcheese because relative to each object there nothing is changing, only the space between the objects is getting longer! space is expanding but those objects havent experienced time! Time would be a flawed definition! In my opinion relative to each object there is no time passing!
TerminalEternal 3 months ago
@TerminalEternal if object a is spinning around object b, then object b is also spinning around object a, and neither object is really spinning at all, but the imagined space around them is the only thing that is changing@!
TerminalEternal 3 months ago
@TerminalEternal arite, i gotcha. but thats a totally different theory. the theory im talking about how time only exists to us this is because we can only see three dimension, when in fact their is four.
rossschcheese 3 months ago
Rob, you've done it again! I've read the book twice and integrated most of the ideas into my personal cosmology. But, it is SO helpful to have additional mental tools for trying to conceptualize the inconceivable. So far this series of vlogs has provided these in abundance. Thank you, kind sir. Looking forward to 5D!
stvbrsn 3 months ago
Thank you for blowing my mind on a regular basis :)
optomekris 3 months ago
Rob, more.
Dude, i just.. duuude, i watch your ummm presentations from time t otime and i still cannot get less astouned of how.. fuking pretty genius you are - with the way you inspire.
More.
youwereinsideme 3 months ago
Thank you for another insightful video.
I recently encountered this strategic PC game, where players can not only view future and past events, but also issue orders in different timelines, and even chronoport their armies through time.
Here's a review I found:
youtube : /watch?v=GcZbpL6ueM8
Thumbs up if you like it!
I wish there was more such mind-exercising material out there - such as what you put out on this channel, but also games and other things, and preferably not just wargames ;-)
mad11red 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
mad11red 3 months ago
lovin' it
selvmordspilot 4 months ago
Braingazum :D
LogicalMayhem00 4 months ago
this series is so good! Keep up the good work!
chenghoman 4 months ago
Rob, if you are going to do a new video on the 5D, please talk slower and allow for some pauses so the viewer can digest a thing or two. I don't want to be terrorized out of my wits by mind-blowing concepts like quantum entanglement, causality, and anti-matter moving backwards in time (duration) :)
Looking forward to the 5D :)
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 What I do when that happens, I put pause, digest, and then continue listening. I'm not an astronomer like my hubby so I have to really put some thought into things people can barely wrap their minds around.
Marlena2006 4 months ago
@Marlena2006
I do pause, but very often the video 'sticks' and won't allow me to pause it, and so I must watch the entire video through, then watch it again. I often find, still, that there's so much information involved in one video, I wish Rob would talk slower and pause a bit. Anyway I guess he can't accommodate all his videos to me lolll
mskitty12311 4 months ago
Nice video, until he got to the 'free will' part. I suppose Rob wants so say that with free will, each decision makes a person travel into different parts of the fifth dimension - but then again, in other universes (or 4D Points) we made other choices, right? I don't see how that is free will, as we are constantly making ALL the choices we can possibly make.
Schindlabua 4 months ago
Why wouldn't the fourth dimension be the first? Our lives involve time don't they?
rosscoolguy 4 months ago
So basically what you're saying is that our whole life is in the fourth dimension like a point is in the first?
t0y2610 4 months ago
My husband is an astronomer and is less "platonic" than I. I on the other hand am so intrigued with time. It is ashame that my enthusiasm for it is nowhere in the vicinity of comprehending it in the least. But I keep searching for this implaccable truth in videos, books..my bible. One day I just asked knew this as truth: God knows what I am doing and thinking NOW. He also knows what someone is doing/thinking in China...and what is going on with some star. ONLY if he is in ALL dimensions.
Marlena2006 4 months ago
@Marlena2006
Quo vadis, Domine?
mskitty12311 4 months ago
I get all this except what do you mean by the biggest possible point if a point has no size?
OrangeSaint420 4 months ago
Your videos are great and complex. I know you have said previously that you are not a physicist and also that you have no intentions to become one, but I have to say that you would be a great one if you wished to. Anyway you are already what you not intend to be. Congratulations!
CoolCrazyAtheist 4 months ago
Basically I understand this one about the 4D. I don't know if this can be explained, but I don't quite get what Rob means by imagining that each next dimension is at right angles to the one before it. I don't understand what right angles has to do with it.
I gather the right angle is derived from the 1° (or arcdegree) of a 360° circle (wiki) (which looks like it would be 90° of the circle, but they call it 1 arcdegree), whereby a little half-square is created at the intersecting points.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
Maybe if I watch it every week before I go to bed, I might start to understand it.
satsumamoon 4 months ago
Congratulations on 400 videos!
ih8txtrytn 4 months ago 44
If we could see the fourth dimension, would we see where we are going to go before we go there? If so, doesn't that deny Free Will? Maybe we can see all future paths? Or maybe we can only see where we've been, and not where we're going?
neonical 4 months ago
@neonical Is it like watching an old movie you know by heart? Just because we know what the characaters are going to do does not mean anyone's will was denied. I don't know... I try to understand it myself....
Marlena2006 4 months ago
loving the animations!
galikazoid 4 months ago
Rob, you constantly blow my mind. Thank you.
3lements 4 months ago
@10thdim
Rob, free will implies omniscience.
kokopelli314 4 months ago
this is a nice standard model theory. unfortunately it has nothing to do with reality. you cannot have something which doesnt exist. namely the imaginary 0 dimension point first dimension 1 or 2nd dimension plane come together to create something real. Instead you need to learn about a much more ancient and modern theory of singularity which Nassim Haramein correctly describes. Good luck in resolving your confusion.
godseyeview 4 months ago
@godseyeview
I read The Schwarzschild Proton. Thanks for that. Here's something similar, along the same reasoning mnNsswDgoGg
Looks like Newtons ghost is haunting Cambridge...again!
kokopelli314 4 months ago
@kokopelli314 thanks . that was an incredible information you showed me.
godseyeview 4 months ago
@godseyeview Yeah, that was pretty eye-opening. Another paper that references these concepts "Hadrons as Kerr-Newman Black Holes" , written by Robert Oldershaw in 2006 was published in the March, 2010 Journal of Cosmology.
kokopelli314 4 months ago
@godseyeview
The ancient philosophers discussed the nature of the Universe long, long ago, upon which modern Science was built upon. Rob is hardly discussing some 'nice standard model theory'.
Nassim Haramein talks about Sacred Geometry. This field goes back to the ancients also.
It looks to me both modern Science AND Sacred Geometry somehow are converging. I don't see what Rob discusses somehow occludes Sacred Geometry, as you seem to think.
Anyway, just saying.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 actually no . Nassim Haramein asserts that we do not live in a non existent 0 1, 2, dimensions come together to make a 3rd. Logically that idea is ridiculous Instead we live in a fractal comprised of recursive black holes. namely every self replicating system surrounded by an energy field being one. which includes atoms, stars, blackholes, living organisms, planets. within the center of each blackhole contains another universe. look up rouge valley
godseyeview 4 months ago
@godseyeview
As you wish, but I watched some of Haramein's video
video[dot]google[dot]com/videoplay?docid=6151699791256390335
(PART 1) Nassim Haramein at the Rogue Valley Metaphysical Library. 2003. (4 HRS)
where he begins w. a course in high school where he learned of dimensions, dot, line, cube, etc. The problem he had at the time was one of simple semantics -- he took words in an extreme logical sense. This leads to confusion with visualizing, when taking things too literally.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 ok so u watched it. I mean when you are trying to model things in reality u have to take things literally. i mean u cant just go from representing imaginary ideas and then go to reality. because people suppress reality i mean suspended disbelieve but taken to science and hence reality that is why religious scientist are able to terrify any entrepreneurs in thought. what i mean is that scene within this video where only the 4th dimension is woobly. no the entire structure is.
godseyeview 4 months ago
@godseyeview
What you fail to understand, and what Haramein as a teen-ager initially failed to understand, is that in order to explain abstract ideas, Science always must find ways to express abstract ideas in order to convey the abstraction. Probably many confuse the word 'abstract' with 'imaginary'. There is a world of difference involved with these two words, and often mere semantics, mere words themselves, can lead to incredible confusion that it would take an atomic bomb to dislodge.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@godseyeview
My feeling is that after he understood the dimensional model as simply a starting point for visualizing the dimensions, and got passed his semantic confusion of taking a concept to mean a 'literal dot', a 'literal line', a 'literal cube', etc., he understood the beginning building blocks of the scientific model, and was able to take off from there with unified fields, sacred geometry, etc. He's o.k., more of a 'pop physicist' sort of thing, and interesting in his way.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 actually he is not a pop physicist but more like a modern day Copernican revolution. what i mean is before the solar centric model of the orbits it was earth centric. I mean any model of reality can be a starting point but as if you very off base the maths get very confusing. case is a earth centric model there is alot of complicated retrograde motion of concentric orbits. same with the standard model. the unexplained strong force and dark matter are some examples.
godseyeview 4 months ago
@godseyeview
As I said, Haramein is interesting in his way.
If you mean to say Haramein is at the forefront of a Copernican revolution, I'd have to ask you to post a link to his curriculum vita, his list of refereed publications, & list of conferences attended, titles of talks & invited talks, w. links to the conference websites that show scope of conference w. list of attendees. Not that i have anything against Haramein, but my bet is such a curriculum vita of his does not exist online.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@godseyeview
My point being, that Science has evolved away from the geocentric or earth-centered model (the Copernican model) of the Universe, but Haramein is not the originator of ideas like the unified field theory, quantum physics, chaos theory, etc., as you seem to imply he that he is. Haramein, as a kind of 'pop physicist' simply gives his take on all these new theories (from what I can see from his videos).
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 i did not imply he is the originator of quantum physics, chaos theory, etc. what i am saying though is that he has created a unified field theory which brings together relativity, quantum physics, chaos theory under one recursive self replicating automaton. He explains everything with one principle and hence simplifies our understanding of reality much like Copernicus with his solar centric model of orbits. He covers consciousness, charge, mass, things the standard model fails.
godseyeview 4 months ago
@godseyeview
I have only your word, and his, to take on this. I've never seen Haramein's name come up in the scientific literature, and I certainly did my share of typing up higher math and physics manuscripts for publication over the years. I could ask my ex-boss's opinion on Haramein's Schwarzschild Proton (if that's the grand unified field theory), but I'm almost certain he would peruse it and give it a snort, and say it's 'pop physics' or something. Does Haramein have a C.V. online?
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@godseyeview
And does he have a list of refereed publications online, which usually includes a list of conferences attended (with links)?
mskitty12311 4 months ago
Wow... this was so incredibly insightful, thank you.
sgtjakass 4 months ago
Lol he said ion-stien. xD
nosamnosam123 4 months ago
Just a question, so anti matter is considered anti time, i guess that would mean it would speed time up. When we have objects of large mass like a sun or a black hole time is slowed down, does this mean with large amounts of anti-matter time would be sped up?
iceblitzyt 4 months ago
you need to go on the joe rogan experience!
triantulas 4 months ago 21
@triantulas no he needs to go on TED
sanguinesurfer 3 months ago
@sanguinesurfer whats the TED?
triantulas 3 months ago
@triantulas
It stand for Technology, Education and Development. It's a forum where people can present their scientific work or art, inspiration, etc.
There's also TEDx events around the world - I think are those are sponsored local gatherings.
You can find them easily on youtube. Enjoy :-)
mad11red 3 months ago
@triantulas That would be a good interview.
Stonefactor 3 months ago
@triantulas all day!
QofLife69 3 months ago
@triantulas yeah because joe rogan is clearly scientific minded. lulz
kapwns 3 months ago
I remember the episode of Sliders where they covered something similar. :D
packfan678 4 months ago
This is so odd, I spent a majority of my YT browsing yesterday looking for 4D explanation videos and was sorely disappointed I could find nothing of your Rob. Then you bring forth this gem, it's like you are a mind reader. In short, thank you and glad to see you posting again.
Gokiza 4 months ago
Thanks Rob. This new series which explains the concepts of the tenth dimension in depth more is fantastic! It really makes me think about how the dimensions are all interconnected and that just calling the fourth dimension "time" is too simplistic - points in higher dimensions encompass the whole of the dimensions below it (I think?). Looking forward to the rest and if you're gonna convince me that I have free will!
mahmoudyzadeh 4 months ago
If the Sun is 4.6 billion years old, is the Earth receiving its light today from that long ago in the past?
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 it takes around 8 minutes for the suns light to reach the earth.
rofllolzkek 4 months ago
@rofllolzkek
Yes, as I read it takes 8 light minutes. Well, I guess its original light from 4.6 billion years ago has since swept passed the Earth long ago, and the light from the Sun is newly created from inside the Sun, which the Earth receives in the 'past' on an 8 light minute delay. This is getting way too heavy for me.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 when we look at light coming from the sun, yes we are essentially looking 8 minutes into the past. now account for the light that is coming in from billions of light years away, and essentially we are looking billions of years into the past, all the way up until the big bang.
rofllolzkek 4 months ago
@rofllolzkek
Do you mean light coming in from other galaxies? Yes, it's mind-boggling. I am not sure, though, that all astronomers have agreed on a big bang singularity ("theories of the origin of the primordial state remain very speculative"-wiki)
Time may not be linear? [con't]
mskitty12311 4 months ago
From wiki:
"It is not known if something existed before the singularity that we call Big Bang, nor if time is linear, since the expansion estimated by Hubble's law assumed a linear expansion, and later work indicates there may have been variations. "
This confuses me no end what they mean work indicating time may not always be linear. I don't know what they mean by that.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
I just had a visualization, but don't know if this would be scientifically true:
If a spaceship traveled to a star that was 10 light years back in time, would the crew actually be going back in time in a literal sense?
A second thought: I suppose we only see the light from stars from the past -- and no light from stars from the future is possible?
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 Remember that a light year is a measurement of distance. The light from that star takes 10 light years to reach us on earth, so no, the crew would not be going back in time. What you're thinking about is time-dialation that explains how time isn't always the same for people travelling at different speeds, but that has nothing to do with this.
On your second thought: Like I said, we se the light from a star that was emitted an x number of years ago where x is the distance in ly.
Gyroglle 4 months ago
@Gyroglle
Oh right. Thanks for that clarification. The light year is a measurement of DISTANCE. I was getting confused.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
hang on, a 4th dimension concept requires duration. True... But they also need a 5th dimension direction to change. Causality?
spartan117ak 4 months ago
I had to google what a right angle looks like |_ , and find it measures 90 degrees.
As fascinating as that information is, I always wondered where do they get the degrees from? It appears to be from the circle, always described as having 360 degrees. Why 360 degrees?
This is too fascinating to pass up, so wiki:
mskitty12311 4 months ago
"The original motivation for choosing the degree as a unit of rotations and angles is unknown. One theory states that it is related to the fact that 360 is approximately the number of days in a year. Ancient astronomers noticed that the stars in the sky, which circle the celestial pole every day, seem to advance in that circle by approximately one-360th of a circle, i.e., one degree, each day.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
An alternative theory is that the degree is 1/16 of the angle of an equilateral triangle. The earliest trigonometry, used by the Babylonian astronomers and their Greek successors, was based on chords of a circle. A chord of length equal to the radius made a natural base quantity. One sixtieth of this, using their standard sexagesimal divisions, was a degree. "
So it all goes back to the ancient astronomers, Babylonians, and Greeks. Fascinating.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
But I don't understand why it states "The original motivation for choosing the degree as a unit of rotations and angles is unknown" and why they then give 'theories' -- when obviously enough the earliest known ancient astronomers (i.e. Mayans, Egyptians etc.), Babylonians, and Greeks basically all came up with the idea of choosing 360 degrees and their reason for it -- observation of the heavens. What other 'original motivation' could be meant by that statement?
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 Hmmm not sure if its relevant but I do know that ancient astronomers both in the west and in the east divided the night sky into 12 quadrants ( a number divisible into 360), perhaps the number 12 had some significance to them?
Nerfherder3 4 months ago
@Nerfherder3
Personally I've always loved Astrology and find it has a lot of truth to it. In ancient times, if I'm not mistaken, the astrologers *were* the astronomers to begin with.
Maybe you are right. The 'unknown' 'original motivation' might be a side-stepping of the ancient astrologers by not giving them the credit for the original observations of the heavens. Perhaps the wiki writer should have said "Ancient astronomers [ASTROLOGERS] noticed that the stars in the sky..."
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@Nerfherder3 Twelve spokes, one wheel, navels three. Who can comprehend this?
On it are placed together three hundred and sixty like pegs. They shake not in the least. — Dirghatamas , Rigveda 1.164.48
There is definitely a mystique about the number 12. It appears all over both the Old and New Testament also. Some say Sacred Geometry is encoded in both.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311
You mean cord. Further, everything goes back to the ancients. Ever heard of the Atomism?
AugustinusHipponesis 4 months ago
@AugustinusHipponesis
Might have heard of Atomism, not sure. I'll google it: " Atomism (from ancient Greek atomos, meaning "uncuttable") is a natural philosophy that developed in several ancient traditions. The atomists theorized that the natural world consists of two fundamental parts: indivisible atoms and empty void."
They were pretty ADVANCED if you ask me !
It's fascinating to learn its ancient roots, the names of the ancients & all.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
I have a question: Is there really such a thing as "now", since everything we see around us actually is from the past (whether it be a few nanoseconds ago or 10 years ago)?
Davve941018 4 months ago
I study law and I thank you because I admire and love physics and this is an outstanding way to feed that admiration even being in another completely different field.
sebastianrc 4 months ago
It's weird how, when I look at " '3-cube a 'cube' " I don't actually see the cube, but see a dome-like structure as from above. But a refocusing of the eye, I can then see the cube clearly. That's really weird.
mskitty12311 4 months ago
@mskitty12311 Yea me too. It is really weird
Cannovich 4 months ago
YES
Davve941018 4 months ago