Added: 3 years ago
From: BereanBeacon
Views: 23,596
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (277)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Cro-magnon was more robust and had a bigger cranial capacity than moden man.

    Have fun with your "cluba cluba ooga booga fire fire!" theories.

    And those cave paintings in France ARE a work of Art! some of those painting are extremely proportionate, extremely realistic, depicting movement, anotomicaly correct in all ways! beautiful indeed. before modern europoids landed...Rhino's in france? who would have thought! pre-flood was a whole different world! with whole different lineages of peoples.

  • God such a Big 'Ed (no pun intended) . "Oh look at me I made the Heavens and the Earth and everyhting that creepeth and crawleth upon it, in 6 days ....at it was good" .....and what does he do these days .....makes impressions of his son Jesus Christ on the back of tortilla chips

  • There is truth weaved in and around all these theories. Man has been around for hundreds of millions of years, so creationists are wrong in their belief that man is only 6000 years old, and evolution..... don't get me started on that bullshit head in the sand theory

  • The only thing you need to hear about this video, is the part where the moronic Aussie speaker says that Cro-Magnon man was more intelligent than the generations that gave us air travel, the microscope, the telescope, the telephone, television, healthcare, clean water and the internet, as they were adept at creating cave paintings. The f*cking mong.

  • Creation as written in Genesis explains what we can see today. Evolutionists have much more faith in their theory, as they have no evidence ;)

  • @earlysda lol siting geniesis as tho it was proof and factual evidence, epict fail.

  • @adelaide "The fossil record supports, since small organisms are found at the bottom of strata, and more advanced life is found over it.” The fossil record is a joke; this is proof of a catastrophic flood. During a flood one would expect mussels to be on the lower layers and more intelligent animals on top (because they would be swim to the surface in an attempt to survive). Hydrologic sorting experiments show some evidence of this kind of layering.

  • @Creation7utube

    LMAO, no amphibians, reptiles, dinosaurs, birds or mammals before fish.

    No reptiles, dinosaurs, birds or mammals before amphibians.

    No dinosaurs, birds or mammals before reptiles.

    Interesting.

  • Respond to this video...Nothing good about this man. Won't be allowed to preach in University. Preys on primary and high school minds. What a fool not to mention outright liar. Degree in geology, masters in selfdelusion. How could one human FAIL so hard ? Must take a lot of effort to fail so hard in one lifetime. Did university degree and understood NOTHING of it. Just a waste. PPPPfffffffffffffftttt. Absolute ROT.

  • @evidenceonlythanx All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK

  • @BereanBeacon1 That $10,000 prize is a fake that can't be won, since evolution happens extremely gradually. If you think that evolutionary theory says that a chicken can evolve into a completely different animal in one human lifetime - or a hundred human lifetimes - then you have no clue what evolutionary theory is all about.

    Real scientists, and even average people who have learned about evolution, laugh at that fake prize and the scientific illiteracy of evolution denial people.

  • @BereanBeacon1 Cluck Cluck?

    More like Quack Quack when you refer to "Doctor" Hovind.

  • @evidenceonlythanx Evidence only eh? I only see sour grapes, ad hom attacks and anme calling from you.

    PErhaps you shold practice what you preach. Oh yeah, you can't since there IS NO EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION! My bad....carry on!

  • @3gdosrsfs nooo, you just ignor the evidence and then site what you learned in sunday school as evidence, i.e. "it says in the bible so it must be true" so not matter what the evidence,you will just rationalize it away due to your mind trying to protect its belief system.but no worries ,i was once like you, so there is hope that you might break free of religious brain washing.

  • @evidenceonlythanx You've described every atheist, agnostic, so-called free thinker, and evolutionists in less than one post. 

  • Comment removed

  • "We're not just here to have a science discussion today." What a disgusting and blasphemous thing for this manipulative indoctrinator and promoter of ignorance to imply his speech has anything at all to do with science.

  • If life started in the sea and moved to the land, then why are their creatures still left in the sea ? If evolution is for the benefit of creatures then why would only some of them change to land animals ? Only some of them had intelligence ? If evolution was true then the sea would be empty of animals. Evolution for some creatures only is a big hole in the theory. Every living thing was made independantly of another, created. There is NO evidence for Evolution. Ask a fish why they don't join us

  • @adelaide102 - Not all living things will do the same thing to survive. When all creatures were in the ocean, the land was just sitting there. It was a vast place for creatures to inhabit. However if everything went on land the land would have been overcrowded and the sea would just be sitting there with nothing in it. Evolution says that if something is suited to it's environment , it will thrive there.. The sea will never be empty as long as it can sustain life , something will live in it.

  • If we all came from a single cell floating in the sea, that cell must have had had a lot of intelligence and brain power to change eventually to a land animal with legs and lungs to breathe air. Why would a simple sea creature want to move onto the land. Only if it had intelligent thought, as growing legs in the sea would not have any purpose for its own environment in the sea. There is no logic in a sea creature changing to a land animal unless it had a thought process to do so.

  • @adelaide102 - The cell floating in the ocean didn't change into anything in it's life time. After this cell replicated and became many cells , the offspring from many cells could mutate. This process took time. I didn't happen over night. The fossil record supports , since small organisms are found at the bottom of strata, and more advanced life is found over it.Intelligence isn't necessary for progress in nature.

  • @adelaide102

    They weren't single creatures that just decided to change, you moron.

  • If life started in the sea, and moved to the land, the first creature to walk on land would have to have legs to move about and survive ? It would have to grow legs first before it left the sea. WIthout legs first it would not survive on land. As legs have no use in the sea, it would of had to have a lot of intelligence firstly to decide that it wanted to go and live on the land, and secondly the ability to grow legs which are of no use in the sea. That is asking a lot of a fish ?

  • @adelaide102 Amen. With science fiction, anything is possible.

  • The Bible is the most amazing book ever written by the inspiration of God! Its the only book that had survice thousands of years and is the #1 best selling book. Its the most history book ever, telling us about the past, present and future! Yet blind fools can't see this do to their lives being depended to their little toys of today's technologies!

  • The trouble I find in most atheists is that they use the same illogical biblical accusations/assumptions (because they fail to understand the full concept of the analogy/metaphor/reasoning/wis­dom behind it), in their redundant arguments, as if rehearsed and memorized. Never do they come up with anything but the same old rhetoric used by so many others. Like clones, saying the same things repetitively as if somehow it will be the final solution to winning their argument. Definition? Insane!

  • @Acecool444 You know, it amazes me how most of the world have become nothing but a pile of ignorant fools with 90% spitting so called "knowledge" but lacking 100% wisdom which is true science and knowledge and truth. and you sir have 100% wisdom! A human which has set its heart rock solid on false lies and false evidence and brain-watch will not change its corrupted mind. I applaud you for standing up to all these fools with IQ's of 3.

  • The most disappointing thing I see among the posts here of fools trying to sound intelligent with the exemption and lack of Wisdom - none of them question the information you have provided them or posted. They are like sheep being led to a slaughter.

  • @LALOMAN18 It doesn't just stop w/ Biblical Astronomical/Geographic/Biolog­ical facts written centuries before the rise of science, nor the astonishing revelation of Theomatic's, but add the many Archeological findings, fulfilled Prophecies, warnings & predictions of present and future world events. Ancient as the Bible might be, it gives credence to the magnitude of God's omnipotent, omnipresence power of being, in that those who understand & faithfully follow, become one with God. Matthew 5:48

  • Inconceivable that with so much proven evidence of God's existence, the agnostic will use only the tools of science "theory" not yet completely formulated, still in it's infancy, with so much further to go in the discovery of where time, space, matter and all life from it's first creation began. But there are Clues: Look closely at the scientific discovery's of invisible energy smaller than molecular particles (i.e. electromagnetic, gravitational, Neutrino, Black Holes, etc,), Continued:

  • Cont:....You will find evidence of something much more complex that not even the theory of an evolved pre-existing physical life form could have created all this. As they too would have had to have been evolved from matter and a 1st living cell.

    Now add, the "Eternal" limitless boundaries of invisible space! The constant moving mass of galaxies and all the energy that co-exists to bind them all as if part of something much bigger (i.e. molecules forming mass). Now compare that to the few..Cont:

  • Cont: ...Now compare that to the few findings of theorized carbon dated bone fragments Scientist's call "humanoid/hominide" fossils where never have been found, duplicate sets of evolved "transitional" humanoid fossil's. One could easily assess the individual finds as merely "Deformed" or "Diseased" human fossils. Namely, severely arthritic, osteoporosis, cerebral palsy, mutant, giant, dwarf, mongoloid, shrunken decay etc, etc,. Carbon Dating is also not an exact science and has it's man flaws.

  • So to conclude, until science can come up with overwhelming empirical evidence formulated as a mathematical fact that cannot be refuted nor disputed and not defined only as "Theory" by the science community as a whole, none of their findings have yet proven in any way, that God in Fact Does not Exist!

    Til then, We can take off the blinders and see the depth of divine knowledge and wisdom that has been handed down to us by our faithful forefathers as inspired by the mind, body and spirit of God.

  • The truth about "ignorance" is that you will have those who refuse to believe in something higher than themselves, or do not have the comprehension of mentality to understand nor research on their own, but take the blundering evidence of others as their lazy way out. And why? Because to be proven wrong, would convince them that they were wrong in embarrassment, thus destroying their prideful puffed up image of themselves. Understandably, THEOMATICS cannot be fully understood by fools.

  • Last comment toward MG42pillbox, was initially meant for "OutOfTheBoxThinker"

    For anyone who refuses to research the correlation of consistency with Theomatics, know that the few debunking theory's lack complete analysis of the proven scientific/mathematical facts and proofs. This is why I make it CLEAR! Before taking the word of another i.e. Theomatics based off randomness), has lackadaisically made a false assumption.

    Search: Theomatics Proven Solidly (and read it FULLY).

  • Ancient Biblical History Didn't Have Advanced Science, BUT!

    Research "IN PLAIN SITE. O R G"

    by going to: triple W dot inplainsite dot o r g

    Scroll down then Click "Site Directory"

    Scroll down then Click "Section 2"

    Scroll down then Click "The Bible"

    Scroll down then Click "Science And The Bible"

    Then Read all 3 headings starting with "Scientific Facts In The Bible"

    Start with "The Universe" and work your way down!

    I.E. The Earth, The Oceans etc,.

  • Great Common Sense assessment!!! (don't need a PHD to figure out the obvious)

    However, It's a shame it's a video still. Thumbup on the lecture! w00t, just what I love to beef up my "science cannot lie atheists delusion" ammo. Jesus Was Cool!!!

    God Does Not Lie! as he is the maker of Truth!

  • @Acecool444 : If God is the Creator of everything in the universe, that makes him the maker of lies, war, torture and other forms of injustice as well. You may argue that it's humans who lie, engage in war or torture but according to your Bible humans are created by God in his image and God is supposed to be able to know the past, the present and the future from the moment of Creation up until today. Doesn't this major faith issues for you as a Christian?! ;-)

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker "Doesn't this major faith issues for you as a Christian?"

    Not in the least. It would all depend on the person who interprets Gods Words/The Bible to either suit their own purpose or God's purpose. Some will find wisdom, and others do not.

  • @Acecool444 : Finding wisdom in the Bible is like finding a handful of gold on the streets of New York City. If you've very very lucky you just might find some, but the chance is extremely small. The Bible has the intellectual and emotional level of a 10-year-old and anyone who considers it wise by any standard much have an intellectual level even below that imo.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker "like finding a handful of gold on the streets of New York City"

    I'm sure if you look hard enough, you'll find gold in some form or another on the streets of New York City! People lose things all the time!

    "The Bible has the intellectual and emotional level of a 10-year-old"

    Yes, I can see how some 10 yr olds would understand the bible.

    Then I shouldn't ask you to research the theory on "THEOMATICS" as I suppose that too would be above your grade level.

  • @Acecool444 : My grade level? Your funny. For your information, I'm a former member of Mensa and I eat pattern recognition for breakfast.

    Anyway, theomatics is grounded in wishful thinking and total rubbish. Only someone with the intellectual level of a 10-year-old would atrribute any value to it, which further illustrates my point ;-)

    And yes, it IS possible for someone to find a lump of gold in NYC, just like it's possible to find wisdom in the Bible. It's just pretty damn rare...

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker "For your information, I'm a former member of Mensa and I eat pattern recognition for breakfast."

    Sure! you are, and I'm the president of the united states!

    You understanding of "Theomatics" is demonstrative of your so called puffed up "Fools Rush In" arrogance. That no matter what evidence is given, you cannot grasp the full meaning or concept of proof.

    Understand this! Theomatics isn't for the slow of mind as it is too highly complex for "some" to completely understand.

  • @Ac444 : Well, mr Obama, it seems you fail to grasp the irony of a Christian fundamentalist claiming others cannot grasp the full meaning or concept of proof when they believe in an imaginary big daddy in the sky who came down to earth just do die for our sins and live again and leave as evidence for all this only a book of primitive mythology filled with contradictions, impossible or highly implausible statements, etc. that's so ambiguous it's interpreted differently on key issues by everyone.

  • @TheBoxThinker "Well, mr Obama/fuckwit/imaginary big daddy in the sky"

    "I understand the need to love my fellow man. I don't need an old book for that." "if we all work together for common goals, respect and love one another as fellow human beings."

    You will know them by their fruits! Mat 7:16

    It's easy to puff ones self up as righteous, but to antagonize with foul words or blaspheme what another man holds dear and sacred is of itself a wicked and evil mind.

    Romans 1:18-32

    Colossians 3:8

  • @Acecool444 : Didn't you say that theomatics must "be above my grade level"?! Isn't that a form of antagonizing?

    I'm merely pointing out how silly Christianity really is and if I offended you by doing so, I apologize. After doing the research extensively, I merely don't see any merit in propagating the teachings of the Bible compared with a more rationalist outlook on life, which does not exclude the possibility of some kind of creative force science cannot measure (yet).

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker "Didn't you say that theomatics must "be above my grade level"?! Isn't that a form of antagonizing? "The Bible has the intellectual and emotional level of a 10-year-old"

    Your blasphemous attack on the word of God in which I believe as sacred, was in line with an undeveloped mind of a 10 yr old which you started and agreed. And your constant calling me "KID". Your nothing more than a lying hypocritical antagonist and finger pointer. btw, It's not an insult if it's the truth!

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker Like I said before, Your unfit for debate on any mature level. To throw temper tantrums and blasphemous remarks is only a tool of the Devil and yes! a childish mind. Then to argue that I deserved the insults as if I started it, is out of a lying mouth (twisting words). You've already been marked as reprobate, so it would be entirely futile to go on any further. Like I said before, if it's the truth, It is not an insult, as Jesus also referred to those like yourself, as fools.

  • @Acecool444 : When you say that "theomatics isn't for the slow of mind as it is too highly complex for some to completely understand" you probably mean to say that you don't really fully understand it yourself but believe in whatever some Christian apologists tell you about it. That's the case for most Christians. Anyone who truely understands the Bible cannot be a real Christian since understanding the Bible leads one away from Christianity.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker "you probably mean to say that you don't really fully understand it yourself but believe in whatever some Christian apologists tell you about it."

    Keep reaching, you can twist, manipulate, delude, confuse, lie, assume all that you wish, but it will not change the facts. If you cannot understand the principle, correlation and complexity of all that is involved within "THEOMATICS", you were mistakenly placed in "Mensa". Pattern Recognition? You must 1st! research the evidence!

  • @Acecool444 : There is no complexity within Theomatics. There's just randomness. Theomatics has been debunked by various sources. A prominent example is Paul D. Ackerman (Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Wichita State University). I'll send you a link to his rebuttal as well as other sources on the same topic via PM.

  • @Acecool444 : Since I can't send you a PM, I posted the sources I mentioned on your profile.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker Nothing showed up on my personal profile. And as of now, you've been blocked. I have no time for nonsensical conspiracy theory's debunking Theomatics. "So and so said....". Like I said, research it yourself and abstain from taking the word of others (thinking within the box).

    For others! The Word of God foretold what has been discovered this past century. Signs of advanced intelligence that man could not have known on his own.

    Search! "SCIENTIFIC FACTS IN THE BIBLE"

  • @Ac444: I don't know what happened to my comment, but I did see it get posted. Anyway, even Christian apologetics sources like "godandscience dog org" don't take Theomatics seriously. It's not a "nonsensical conspiracy theory" to accept the notion that theomatics is based on random occurances of numerical values. It can easily be proven to be the case as the three sources I posted have. What truely is a nonsensical conspiracy theory is the claim that some God hid magical numbers in the Bible.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker "What truely is a nonsensical conspiracy theory is the claim that some God hid magical numbers in the Bible."

    A simple case of "I DID NOT RESEARCH IT ON MY OWN, BUT TOOK THE FALSE ASSUMPTIONS OF OTHERS THAT THEOMATICS IS BASED ON NUMEROLOGY "...God Did Not Hide Anything! The original ancient Hebrew and Greek Text was in fact written much like Roman Numerals which had both values of Numbers AND Letters! For the love of God, You give them proof, and they mock it.

  • @Acecool444 : In my life I've debated the most diverse people, from factory laborers to professors, from fundamentalist Christians to communists in a very respectful and rational fashion. If you feel I've been unfair to you or your position that's your right to do so, but I have a tendency to stand up against the vast level of igorance you display and it's you, sir, who's behaving like an ignorant and petty child.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker "I'm a former member of Mensa,

    I've debated the most diverse people, from factory laborers to professors,........in a very respectful and rational fashion."

    Add, High School Honor Student consecutively all 4 yrs, Top 10% of the entire So. Cal School Dist. on ACT/SAT scores, 82nd ABN Jump School Honor Grad, I.Q. of 145 and Far Too many others to list of even greater scale (as I am not a braggart and do not LIE!) to those you debate.

    So continue making a fool of yourself.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker Your assessment of me as being an "ignorant petty child" or a "kid", or any of the other personal attacks on me hardly makes any of your conversations respectful or rational as you claim. It is nothing more than a last attempt to discombobulate your opponent with ridicule over your black n' white world views.

    Ever hear the aphorism, "Argue with a fool, and they just beat you with experience" The Fools Law?

    That has entered my mind several times now, but held off till now!

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker Had you been wiser and holster that sword of yours and behave yourself without all the condescending diatribes, we may have had a rational debate going on here. Should I not have had to make continual rebuttals teaching you something your parents should have taught you, our time wouldn't have been wasted here. You must 1st let go that prideful ego of yours and act like an adult before ever assuming you're fit for debate on any level. This takes time, I suggest you work on it.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker ""The Bible has the intellectual and emotional level of a 10-year-old"

    That was the first insult! To mock the word of God as coming from the mentality of an undeveloped brain of a 10 yr old, is not only blasphemous, but downright sacrilegious of another mans heart, soul and mind of what he holds holy and sacred. Referring to me as a kid, childlike, ignorant or any other form of belittlement or degrading one of my own family members is nothing compared to this in my view.

  • @Acecool444 : Faith is not wanting to know what's true by blindly believing in authority figures. Philosophy is the quest for knowledge. As such, philosophy is incompatible with faith but compatible with theory. Christians' reliance on the authority of simpleminded primitives is what makes their mindset so immature and undeveloped. If you find this assessment insulting that's your problem, not mine, since most scientists would agree with my assessment of Christianity.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker If you haven't learned anything from all that I have said, then I feel sorry for you. Not in the sarcastic form of pity, but genuinely sorry for you. If you continue to live life as you do, thinking that people who don't agree with your worldly view of evolution, then I suggest you start from the bottom and learn the true definition of Theory. To argue Faith in God vs Theory (philosophy vs theory) is in itself preposterous! as with evolution, they cancel each other out!

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker Appaerently you never read genesis. He knows of evil because he is capable of it but he chooses good as do many people like you and I . I am sure you don't try to lie as much as you can or be as mean and evil as possible just because you know you can. That logic is flawed.

  • @TheBbg83 : If there truely were a benign, all-knowing and all-powerful God somewhere up in the sky, why wouldn't he have found a way for the entire world to KNOW (not believe in but actually know) about his existence and why did he create a species capable of such a great evil to all other species as well as its own (humans) based on his own image? Nothing makes sense abnout your primitive God image once you start thinking deeper about it.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker You have not read the bible and your assumptions make this clear, God Bless

  • @TheBbg83 : I HAVE read the Bible and it's precisely my reading and understanding of the Bible that made me reject it as the nonsense it really is. The better you know and understand the Bible, the less it will make sense, the less consistent it will seem. In fact, there are numerous examples of seminary students who left Christianity while in seminary because they understood the Bible better than ever (as they learnt a lot of facts they weren't told in Sunday school).

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker God can not fit in a book. B.I.B.L.E= Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth. It is meant to help you understand you need to love your fellow man. If you understand this part then you realize empathy is very important. I would say also research NDE's. I hope you find peace in this world, God Bless you.

  • @TheBbg83 : I understand the need to love my fellow man. I don't need an old book for that. Mere common sense already tells me the world is a far better, safer and more prosperous place if we all work together for common goals, respect and love one another as fellow human beings.

    If the Bible helps you achieve this, I guess it's a good thing. I just think you'd be far better off if you came to that same conclusion without the Bible, by thinking for yourself...

  • Evolution is a myth!

  • @elazar79 Evoltion is a process, there is even a theory to show how it works.

  • We're not just here to have a scientific discussion....

    He said a mouthful there.

  • Awesome.

    I like this speaker.

    Praise the Lord.

  • Stay out of our schools you chocolate coated nut bag.

  • @stramster1 Excellent suggestion, as you people have destroyed real education and now schools produce zombies such as yourself. Perhaps you should sue the NEA under the product liability law, which states: knowingly releasing a flawed product on society.

  • @stramster1 All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK

  • @BereanBeacon1 Hmmm. Another nut for the bag?

  • @BereanBeacon1 There's no science to the life "science" prize, so give it up. It's a scam by a couple of fundies who are demanding the rest of the world convince them of something they'll never believe, no matter what evidence exists.

    Meanwhile, real science is thankfully moving right along, ignoring your incessant clucking, and giving you things like flu shots, gene therapy, and advanced antibiotics. Or do you eschew such offenses to your creationist faith?

  • @foxhole8063 The Bible wasn't written for everyone to understand, some folks are blinded because of rejection. Either way, keep up with the flu shots, gene therapy, plastic food, and the llike. Since you are only chemicals and not a created soul, keep your doctors and government close. And Good Luck...

  • @eliridesfast I'll pass on the plastic food, but the flu shots and other applications of evolutionary theory have been pretty useful for me and others. You too, I'm sure. By the way I'm agnostic, not atheist. So if there is a god, I think he'll be glad to know I'm using the gift of reason he gave me instead of clinging desperately to the literal interpretation of a book that gives a different physical history of everything we're discovering about the world he created.

  • @eliridesfast For what it's worth ... if science ever shows objective, repeatable, testable evidence of a soul, God, or anything else, I'll be more than happy to convert. Up to (and including) now, no one has found proof of an immortal soul; all we have are stories and myth based on an understandable fear of oblivion after death.

    Until then, I'll live my life well within the bounds of civil society. I don't need the threat of eternal damnation to govern my behavior.

  • @foxhole8063 Very very, well said. One thing I would like to add is that nobody, not philosophers nor theologians have ever been able to define what a soul is or how it differs from conscious. Seems there is much work or no work to be done on this subject.

    Thanks for picking up the slack with your reply to Beacon1 I tend not to spend much time on the nutters.

  • @BereanBeacon1 : All DNA evidence is conclusive about the fact that all animals have common ancestors. Evolution is a fact accepted throughout the scientific world. Claiming that "all evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet" is either a lie of a statement of extreme ignorance because it couldn't be further from the truth.

  • @OutOfTheBox Human beings share 90% of their DNA with a banana, does not prove anything. Accepting Evolution as a fact does not make it a fact. Even Darwin had his doubts. Intelligent design theory suggests that the complexity of human cells could not have happened by accident or evolution, it had to be designed like that to start with. Now that is a theory like the theory of evolution, so why is one a fact and not the other.

  • @adelaide102 : Evolution is a fact because it has been proven by DNA research. We know so much about DNA today we can tell exactly how each species is related to other species and where different species branched into other species. We even know for a fact that two ape chromosome pairs have melded to become a single human chromosome pairs. "Intelligent design" is based on the denial or ignorance of scientific facts and is not a science by any means, whereas evolution is based on proven facts.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker The Moon is gradually getting further away from the Earth each year. Now take that movement away and times that by 6billion years and the moon would be so close to the Earth that no life would have started because of the constant tidal waves and other extreme effects of the moon's gravity. That is a theory like the weakening of the Earth's magnetic field which going back billions of years would mean again no life possible on Earth. These can be facts too.

  • @adelaide102 : Whether or not the moon has been gradually moving further and further away from the earth is irrelevant since there's no way to show this has been the case for billions of years. For all we know, this could have been caused by a meteorite impact just a few thousand years ago. Christian fundamentalists are desperately seeking the most absurd arguments for their silly thesis of young earth creationism but they lack any evidence at all whereas there's ample evidence for an old earth.

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker Ok I am curious. how many enormous impacts could our moon really take seeing its hollow and when we landed on it it rang for 2 days. there are no true evidences for an old earth.

  • @TheBbg83 : The moon is hollow? It rang for two days? Where do you get this pseudo-scientific nonsense from?

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker My point is that if Evolution is a fact then so is Creationism, because there is a theory for both. If Evolution is right and humans evolved from apes, why are apes still on the planet ? Why have humans not evolved into another species.All the species on Earth today are seperate entities where are creatures that are half of one species and half of another which must be if evolution is still going on. Also you can be a creationist without being any kind of Christian.

  • @adelaide102 Umm..I think you have the wrong idea on the evolution theory. I get what you're saying but you're a bit off..like a lot off.

  • @adelaide102 - I realize this is an old comment but I still wanted to respond. You asked why are there still apes if we evolved from apes? We didn't evolve from apes but we evolved from a common ancestor with apes. Apes evolved just humans did, but from a different branch of the same ancestor.

    Also if you ever found a fossil that is half one species and half another species , it would DIS - prove evolution. Not prove it. Evolution says that species evolve slowly over a long period of time.

  • @TheEarthFirst Do we know what that ancestor was ? All species evolve over time, but I cannot see any evidence of one species turning itself into another species. If evolution was right why would apes still be apes,as humans are evidently more capable pysically and mentally, apes do not have the ability to speak etc. Why would one ancestor develope the ability to walk upright and speak and the other not, if they come from the same ancestor. They must be seperate creations ?

  • @adelaide102 - You ask some very good questions . I will do my best to answer them. I realize you have your own opinions and you are entitled to them. It doesn't hurt though to know about it, even if you still disagree

    Fossil evidence does show species changing from one thing to another, over time. With humans , there many species that are neither ape nor human. They show ape features and human features. The early ones show more ape features and the later ones show more human features.

  • @adelaide102 -To keep it simple we say that modern apes and humans have a common ancestor. Humans didn't come from modern apes. However that doesn't completely answer the question. From my understanding from what I have read , humans came from apelike creatures that don't exist anymore. They evolved into us. The ancestors of modern apes were something way more primitive then. They still shared a common ancestor with us but back then they were way more primitive (contd).

  • @TheEarthFirst I still don't understand why a sea creature could adapt itself to living on the land. Why would it develope the capabilities to live on land if it was surviving in the sea, unless it had intelligence to do so. A sea creature would need the ability to move about on the land, and develope that capability before leaving the sea. Why have dolphins who have a degree of intelligence not developed the capablility to survive on land, if other more simple creatures did many years ago.

  • @adelaide102 - Intellegence isn't the only thing that moves something to progress. There are fish right now that can survive on land but they live in water. There may be other things about Dolphins that wouldn't suit them to land. A less intellegent fish may have had the body for it.

  • @TheEarthFirst Do you believe that all life on Earth comes from a single organisim that started life in the sea and evolution started the process where we have the many species today.If that is the case is evolution a chance process does it have any rules, does it have any intelligence behind it ? It is a fascinating subject and I certainly don't have all the answers but it is good to debate the subject with you.

  • a day in heaven with the lord is a thousand years on earth.so 6 days is 6000 years.

  • gregrutz "Fuck You asshole." ahh the true calling card of the intellectual Atheist.

  • @sh3rv I am not an atheist dip shit.

  • Why must so many idiots comment? Do us all a favor that HAVE half a brain. Fight the urge to reply to ANY video unless you've got something that will add to the subject. I responded to "gregutz" (pronounced, "Gray Guts") & not only suggested he ask a leading archeologist where & IF he could view a real giant's bone/s, & even gave him the vid to search & watch (the powers that run this world DON'T WANT US TO SEE THESE THINGS, O BLIND ONE) & he writes back, "then answer my question." I mean..WTF?

  • @Kazyman Fuck You asshole.

  • They called an emu a chicken... and Tomatoes originated from tropical forests in South America which have a high humidity year round.

  • why would there be a wide variety of books discrediting other religions,when we live in a christian culture,so i think his point like many christian arguments,depends on people not thinking things through or thinking for themselves at all

  • Video is not playing. Considering the nature of the subject, I think it is important that we can see his presentation. Please fix it.

  • @itchy8me ye, its dumb we cant see his slides and such

  • Humans could grow a lot larger or shrink, if they planetary configuration in this solar system changes again.

  • they are many on you tube being excavated 

  • The fossil record has a history of all life on earth.

    Millions of years of it, showing how life changed over time.

  • VIDEO NOT PLAYING. AUDIO PLAYS.CAN VIDEO BE FIXED?

  • @LITTLEBOBBY57 typical atheistic mentality conspiricy

  • @SuperPatrick777 -YOUR REPLY HAS NO SANE PURPOSE TO MY REQUEST FOR VIDEO. ARE YOU JUST AN ANTAGONIST WHO LIKES TO GET KICKS WASTING TIME BELITTLING OTHERS FOR YOUR LACK OF CIVIC MINDEDNESS, OR LAZINESS IN DISCOVERING THAT GOD IS REAL AND THE BIBLE IS A TRUE STORY? PLEASE FEEL FREE TO RESPOND TO MY INTEREST IN UNDERSTANDING YOUR ATTITUDE.

  • @LITTLEBOBBY57

     what are you harping on about

  • @SuperPatrick777 -HARPING ABOUT? ARE YOU AN ASPIRING IRRATATIONIST?YOU STATED TO MY COMMENT ABOUT HOPING VIDEO COULD BE SHOWN WITH THE AUDIO, INSULTINGLY SAYING "TYPICAL ATHEISTIC MENTALITY CONSPIRACY..." THIS MAKES NO SENSE TO ME. MAYBE YOU COULD TEACH ME WHAT YOU MEANT TO CONVEY TO ME. MAYBE I HAVE LOST MY ABILITY TO COMPREHEND SIMPLE MINDEDNESS.

  • @LITTLEBOBBY57

     " simple minded " yes you said it ...

  • @SuperPatrick777 -SIMPLE MINDEDNESS ABOUT YOUR IRREVERENT IRRATIONAL COMMENTS. SIMPLE MINDED IS WHAT YOU STATED, AS WE DON'T ACTUALLY SPEAK, WE WRITE. HAVE YOU ANYTHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO WRITE? ASIDE FROM YOUR DIVERSIONARY COMMENTS, TOTALLY AFAR FROM THE VIDEO NOT MOVING, IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE VOID OF REASONING AND SUBSTANCE THAT YOU MIGHT LIKE TO SHARE WITH THE WORLD?

  • @LITTLEBOBBY57

     keep takeing the tablets

  • @SuperPatrick777 -WHAT TABLETS? YOUR ATTEMPT AT HUMOR IS CLICHED AND TIRING. IF YOU HAVE NO COMPUNCTION TO DISCUSS YOUR INANE RESPONSES AS TO THEIR SUBSTANCE OR REDEEMING VALUE, I WILL REFUND MY TIME FROM TRYING TO HELP YOU GAIN KNOWLEDGE. ANY FURTHER RESPONSES FROM YOU AKIN TO THE FORMER ONES, WILL ILLICIT A NO RESPONSE ACTION FROM ME. LET ALL WHO READ THIS FORUM KNOW THE EXTENT OF YOUR NEUROSIS. YOU'RE WASTING YOUR TIME , NOT MINE.

  • @LITTLEBOBBY57 don't try to sound clever you make yourself look a fool ....

  • @LITTLEBOBBY57

    Not supposed to play...

  • i have watched several videos similar to this but i am still confused.

  • @gogo90go That is what they are trying to do, confuse people.

    They don't have any evidence to support their view, so they say there is no evidence for evolution, radiometic dating does not work, the fact that we are apes is due to 'common design'.

  • ITT: Christfags rambling about stuff no sane people cares about

  • If creation is right, how come out of 106 bible colleges only 5 teach biblical creation. The other 101 teach that Genesis is allegory.

  • evolution didnt happen this has all been around for ever , we were here and so were all the creature. tens of thousands of years ago we were giants before the catechism and the atmosphere was damaged everything was bigger,

  • @IRSFRAUDEXPOSED I would like to see a giant.

    What museum can I go to and see a 'giant' fossil of a human?

  • @gregrutz You obviously just started doing research on this subject, Otherwise you would begin to realize how the largest museums have been covering up the truth for over a century,, But you can just keep believing everything national geographic tells you and make a really good sheep...

  • @MG42pillbox oh ya, i forgot, it a plot.

    national geographic is not a science book.

  • @MG42pillbox Sorry,Dinosaur bones were pulled from the ground well before darwins theory of evolution was presented. The church went to great lengths to dispute and discredit him,now if there was ever any evidence of giants it would have been found because the church was desperate to proove the fairytales in the bible and atleast give some idea how we would have been able to survive against sush giant beasts.NOTHIG HAS EVE BEEN FOUND! Look at evidence and stop relying on the excuse called faith.

  • @MG42pillbox The reality of this situation is you have your belief, I have mine, and nothing I can say will change your belief, nor anything you say about the theory's of evolution will change mine. I've already given Evolution quite an unbiased "in depth" extensive research and study, where I've found too many loopholes that contradict most findings as even to be considered theory as many findings have been proven hoax's or assumptions/opinions, even by other leading scholars and scientists.

  • @Acecool444 : You find in an ancient book of primitive mythology and highly questionable morality (you do know the Old Testament / Torah supports slavery, murder, pillaging, rape and other highly immoral acts when it's against the enemies of the Jews, right?) convincing as a guide for life, but you reject proven scientific facts because you can't wrap your head around them and allow yourself to be bamboozled by long debunked Creationist propaganda. Yet you wonder why I don't take you seriously..

  • @gregrutz Well the Asian populations of Homo Erectus were typically over 6ft tall.

  • @kjmoon21 Between 1929 and 1937, 15 partial craniums, 11 lower jaws, many teeth, some skeletal bones and large numbers of stone tools were discovered in the Lower Cave at Locality 1 of the Peking Man site at Zhoukoudian, near Beijing, in China. Their age is estimated to be between 500,000 and 300,000 years old.

    How does that fit your timeline?

  • @gregrutz That was in response to where you could see a "giant" fossil. Not really human though but of the homo genus. Now I was aware that homo erectus overlapped with neanderthals, but I wasn't aware that they coexisted for so long. Don't confuse me for one of the bible thumpers here, I was making a joke about finding "giant" hominids in a museum haha

  • @gregrutz You would probably do well do to get in touch with the archaeologist who sat down with Project Camelot, to ask where you can see bones of giant races (that's right...just like The Bible says...search..Project Camelot Interviews Klaus Dona, Spiritual Archaeologist . The full skeletal ones you see on Youtube were all PhotoShopped by collegiate hopefuls wanting to place well in a contest with that theme, but there were individual giant bones (REALLY BIG) found worldwide over the years.

  • @Kazyman Then answer my question.

    ''What museum can I go to and see a 'giant' fossil of a human?''

  • @Kazyman ''Spiritual Archaeologist '' WTF is that?

    All pictures of giants are photoshopped because they don't exist.

  • @gregrutz Wrong again. Keep groping, it's become a good habit for you.

  • @Kazyman Fuck You asshole.

  • @gregrutz Now THERE'S a deep thought & rebuttal & FOR THE SECOND TIME!!! ROTFLMAO!!! Your'e so fuckin stupid I think I like you! HA HA HA HA HA!!! Nice response!!! It JUST YOUR TYPE that's what's wrong with this country Bird brain! Try something new one day, moron...THINK!!! But don't hurt yourself. HA HA HA HA...oh, that made my day. Thanks.

  • @Kazyman Eat shit IDiot.

  • @gregrutz Okay, look...enough is enough. I shouldn't have insulted you, but there are times when I just can't help myself & for that I was wrong. I apologize & have reminded myself I need more patience with people. Our rebuttals were far removed from what the original discussion was about, so what sense does it make to go back & forth. I wish you luck & again, I'm sorry.

  • @Kazyman HA Ha Ha...I'm sure you'd love to, & thanks for showing us your undisputed intelligence. "Fuck you asshole" is definately a great rebuttal!! YOUR TYPE is what's wrong with this country. Try THINKING, one day cave breath!!..but don't hurt yourself.

  • @gregrutz Sure I'll answer your question...any fucking museum that tickles your fancy.

  • @gregrutz how many fossils/ bones do you see of bison ???

  • @SuperPatrick777 There are lot of bones of bison, early settlers killed millions of them, and many fossils of the animals they evolved from. What is your point?

  • @gregrut " evolved from them " what subjective crap

  • @gregrutz they aint gonna let you see that shit

  • @gregrutz ..Me too! Many people here in Chicago will remember the giant skeleton at the Museum of Natural History, 1940. It vanished just after a few days. There are plenty of researchers who can name the sites where they were discovered, Jonathan Gray for starters.

    If you can get into the Smithsonian's vaults, then I'm sure you can find some shit that will make giant humans seem...not too big of a deal in comparison.

  • So how did the kangaroos get from Turkey to Australia, but the mammals couldn't?

  • Kangaroos hopped to Australia or were introduced by man, as was the rabbit. How is this even remotely related to Evolutionary theory?

  • sorry I asked, you don't understand the question.

    Why didn't the wolf walk there?

  • Anyone with info please message me with the website that John mentions at 06:14.

    I am interested in the Nephilim and am looking forward to hearing the rest of this presentation. My name is Glenn.

    Thank you and God bless you all.

  • I notice that not very many atheists even come to places like this that do a good job of explaining Creation. That could be the reason why they don't know much of anything. No one ever told them the truth and they don't go around looking for truth. Instead, they become militant atheists writing books against their strawman beliefs about God.

  • creation, corruption, catastrophe, confusion, christ, cross, and consummation. these are the 7 cs of "history". i do know what the bible teaches well. there are many interpretations of the bible so if i attack 1 interpretation someone who doesnt follow the interpretationi attacked.

  • Im agnostic and im reading your comment right now and i watch those shity movies XD .. Lol I watch those videos .. Tell me witch biologoy books did you read probobly non soo shut up and enjoy this od prick as he destroys himself.