@rubent100 the "200" released in 2005 and the "200a" relased in 2008 which features improved CCDs and an adjusted lens. These changes improved image quality in addition to providing a wider angle of view (:
This is some of the best AG-HVX200 I've seen. The lens makes a big difference. Is there anything else you changed to get that look? Any filters? Im thinking of getting one due to cost to look ratio.
trevahh - futhermore it's time consuming! and i've seen some people took stuff with hvx and the stuff they took wasn't mindblowing at all just like they took it with some random vhs camera! so they must be something about this guy's version! is it the camera setting or the editing process on his mac? i really need to know! i don't want to spenk 6Gs atnd create shit!
hvx200 is crap , i sold mine a few months ago .. the only great thing is the 100Mbit dvcprohd codec. Handling and Imager is no match with the PMW EX1 or 3.
you've got to tell me. in which scene file mode did you capture this? i'm guessing it's f5 - scene cine v or f6 - scene cine d, right? how about the nd filter? 1/8 1/64 or off? omg please tell me?
You can change them to you own settings too. I'm sure he through off his color temp, turned down the master pedestal, and possibly changed his detail levels as well.
I don't know what to say. Good colors, but most of the shots are out of focus. I'd rather practice more on focusing, or simply just ditch the converter
Dude did you used th Ag-hvx200 or the hvx200A, cuz the noise its pretty low, i like it, and how it comes u recorded 1080 24p, i though it was just 1080i
I have a P2 myself~ In fact, you can use the 1080i mode, but set it to 25P, then you can use P2 as a 1080P camera. In this setting, you can still set your shutter speed freely ^0^
great job!! focus is kinda soft, and I'm not complaining. Not sure if you were going for that or not, but i think it adds to the mood. Nice vid, glad to see another HVX user.
1080/24p? you mean 24fps, not that it recorded 1080 progressive at 24fps, right? I can tell from the moving shots that it's 1080i at 24fps. it becomes a pain in the ass when compositing. looks great though, didn't mean to be a diva over here....
ApesAPopin I had a completely different expierence - the Redrock rocked our production and gave us better results than the mini35. maybe you got a bad unit. I looked at the P+S and Redrock side by side at NAB and the Redrock had a better picture
i shot this, check out tandem in my videos for better looking footage. i will upload more for you, including the upcoming BING BONG BROTHERS short film.
The Redrock sucks. Just shot a feature with it and it kept loosing focus and the lens mount is just a huge pain. It doesn't even have real glass in the thing. It's plastic. The only 35 adapter that is worth anything is the Mini 35.
It is expensive but you pay for quality. The redrock is a cheap piece of junk you could build yourself for even less than they want for it.
sure, the redrock is designed for lower budgets, and is therefore a little more cheaply built. but that just means you have to have people on it that pay close attention and can work with it properly. a good focus puller, a good camera tech. I've used it a few times and had zero problems. not fair to call it a piece of junk just becuse you had some trouble using it. for a great demo, google: redrock studio monthly test
Glad you had a good experience with it. But we had a great focus puller, and camera crew. We had to multiple time take it apart to fix it cause it is cheap. For low budgets go for it, but if you can squeeze the extra money for the Mini 35 I'd say do it. When you are working so inexpensively to begin with spending time dealing with problems due to things like the 35 adapter it can end up costing you even more than it would to rent the Mini 35 to begin with. What camera where you using it on?
hvx200. we had a full set of lenses, 85, 105, 25...never had a single problem with setup, use, or breakdown...all of our shots were locked down, perhaps that was the difference. were you sing a rig or *gak* hand held at all? it may be that the redrock just doesn't like being jostled at all...
Could be it. But still thats pretty bad for what it is supposed to do. In the end it really just comes down to the glass you put in front of it. But we where more or less all handheld.
If you can cup your eye to block out the white background from this site, you can see a bit more detail -enough to see a buzzed actor when he pulls his head back. Otherwise, it's a very dark film. I think contrast looks fine. But probably wasn't shot w/ the YouTube venue in mind;)
VERY nice. It's good to see too because most HVX stuff out there looks far too much like video in my opinion. It seems like the blues always look like bright purple, the reds look far too red - the colors just pop too much --- This looks great though. Very film like. Nice work.
where did all the details in the blacks go? did you do anything to raise the contrast that much? need to be careful especially in dark spots like the ones shown in the movie. the adapter and the lens probably ate up a lot of light...
This is the film that made me buy my hvx and the redrock
osdiel 8 months ago
Aww. That was actually kind of a sad short film. Love the ending, dude. Idk why but it was awesome.
dzpisx 9 months ago
are u using the auuto setting cuz its re focussing in the end idk but check out ur footage
funtimeswithflames 1 year ago
Yesss.
ThatGirlYaShalan 1 year ago
Whats the diffference between the HVX200a and the HVX200?
rubent100 1 year ago
@rubent100 the "200" released in 2005 and the "200a" relased in 2008 which features improved CCDs and an adjusted lens. These changes improved image quality in addition to providing a wider angle of view (:
assend11 1 year ago
Very good steadycam work, reminds me
of the Bourne movies, nice editing, and nice foley!
sinkingship101 1 year ago
It's well worth it to spend time with the camera's manual settings and utilize the 24p mode.
Whyrendog 1 year ago
REALLY cool shots in your footage and your use of HD is pretty cool. But wouldn't you say your shutter speed is a bit high?
LeoAdd0 2 years ago
This is some of the best AG-HVX200 I've seen. The lens makes a big difference. Is there anything else you changed to get that look? Any filters? Im thinking of getting one due to cost to look ratio.
sinkingship101 2 years ago
Comment removed
3mcclaingirls 2 years ago
wow the firestore really made this footage look nice! I need to get a firestore so I can have that look
spongah 2 years ago
isn't the firestore just storage?
sjamesvfx 2 years ago
yeah I was just yankin yur chains :p
spongah 2 years ago
that blue film look color is fantastic at 0:52 perfect color or lens or whatever u used , great vid
korgpadude 2 years ago
looks good to me, good job, steve banks.CSC
JaiPokemonVideos 2 years ago
looks good!
Morseliot 2 years ago
are you using lents for that? hmm but phisically or did you mean software..
tinotrivino 2 years ago
nice what software did you used to edit
cashimirs 2 years ago
trevahh - futhermore it's time consuming! and i've seen some people took stuff with hvx and the stuff they took wasn't mindblowing at all just like they took it with some random vhs camera! so they must be something about this guy's version! is it the camera setting or the editing process on his mac? i really need to know! i don't want to spenk 6Gs atnd create shit!
ConfusedSponge 3 years ago
It has that film look to it because its shot on 35 mm lens. M2 Redrock installed on the HVX. And of course it's color corrected
AaronRashPTV 2 years ago
i have a question i am interested in a new camera. anything under $3,000 any suggestions?
prankster01234 3 years ago
spend the extra 500 bucks and get an HVX200
Trevahhh 3 years ago
are they that good?
prankster01234 3 years ago
Hey.
what type of lens adapter did you use to achieve the grainy look? or was it through post:?
livingroomnyc 3 years ago
Wow digital cinema.
djmelucho 3 years ago
hvx200 is crap , i sold mine a few months ago .. the only great thing is the 100Mbit dvcprohd codec. Handling and Imager is no match with the PMW EX1 or 3.
WiAmp 3 years ago
Idk I haven't seen an EX 1 video that has that color look of a hvx....I like how the HVX handles colors better.
akanathan 3 years ago
that was real nice. well done
jkboro 3 years ago
you've got to tell me. in which scene file mode did you capture this? i'm guessing it's f5 - scene cine v or f6 - scene cine d, right? how about the nd filter? 1/8 1/64 or off? omg please tell me?
ConfusedSponge 3 years ago
You can change them to you own settings too. I'm sure he through off his color temp, turned down the master pedestal, and possibly changed his detail levels as well.
Trevahhh 3 years ago
can you guess his exact settings like his scene file mode, nd filter, color temp, master pedestal, detail levels and etc.
i really need to know. don't expect me to experiments with the pricy p2 or even an external hd! you know how much that cost don't you!
ConfusedSponge 3 years ago
this is beautiful! this is a piece of art!
ConfusedSponge 3 years ago
wow that hass to be better camera. looks real good not fuckin grains
slevencolevra 3 years ago
:35; WOW. THats what a 35mm does.
DistortedDingo 3 years ago
This is fantastic work. I don't care what anyone says, that looks close enough to film to me.
cainda 3 years ago
I don't know what to say. Good colors, but most of the shots are out of focus. I'd rather practice more on focusing, or simply just ditch the converter
McCainUSA 3 years ago
did you do any color correction on this video?
looks great.
frickenchad 3 years ago
Dude did you used th Ag-hvx200 or the hvx200A, cuz the noise its pretty low, i like it, and how it comes u recorded 1080 24p, i though it was just 1080i
perreochacalonero 3 years ago
is it heavy?
mllj0 3 years ago
what type of lense was this?
thegrantlersvids 3 years ago
Beautiful shots. Amazing camera. How much would you say the AG-HVX200 ranges around and how much did you pay for it?
I'm in search of one but am wondering if there's a way to get it cheaper than the panasonics whopping 6 grand.
LilNell 3 years ago
I have a P2 myself~ In fact, you can use the 1080i mode, but set it to 25P, then you can use P2 as a 1080P camera. In this setting, you can still set your shutter speed freely ^0^
zeavanity 3 years ago
HVX films in all formats, SD and HD along with the 60i,30p, 24p frame rates
tkdx2 3 years ago
so cool.. cine gamma i want that camera
Punkdeere 3 years ago
What the.. I'm sure 720p was the largest the HVX could go to, apart from 1080i. ??
Nice vid though, canon lens worked well.
ashleysmithd 3 years ago
The HVX200 goes up to 1080p, but i think it can also film 1080i and it can surly film 720p
-----and 480p :p
patrickkirschner 3 years ago
wow
FXIllusion13 3 years ago
What type of 35mm adapter did you use? Is it just the lens or the full package? Also did you have to use a 50mm lens?
cloudkicker1818 3 years ago
the audio lets the video down, theres a delay
givemethelotion 3 years ago
this IS the film that inspired me to buy the HVX-200 and LetusExtreme and I am glad I did...
ona1r 3 years ago
dont look like letus maybe redrock, is better. sorry
rubent100 3 years ago
Was any post color correction done after this was shot?
thegoosebrain 3 years ago 2
This looks amazing man. hit me up when your ready to sell this camera... haha.
v1ctoryproductions 3 years ago
The Audio is horrible, which is what brings this video down, but otherwise visually it looks really really good. Nice!
drboboh 4 years ago
VERY VERY FILM LIKE its amazing can u tell me how i get this quality with sony fx7 PLEASE i like this color tone a lot (blue)
mouimen 4 years ago
Has anyone had any luck with the DIY 35mm adapter for sell on ebay?
lstation 4 years ago
what kind of 35mm lens was it or brand there are so many out there. i would like to shoot my video with this picture qualaty. thanks.
elpapic 4 years ago
Very good. What did you use to CC? What shutter speed was that?
frankygunpowder 4 years ago
omg amaaziingg i liked that blue cinematic feel at 00:50 did u add any effect to that or it is the adapter 35mm?
mouimen 4 years ago
did u have a focus puller?
Maz1989 4 years ago
great job!! focus is kinda soft, and I'm not complaining. Not sure if you were going for that or not, but i think it adds to the mood. Nice vid, glad to see another HVX user.
dbonez02 4 years ago
wow looks like a real movie
petersonlim 4 years ago 2
great footage...very moody...has a real '70's Werner Herzog quality to it...
daivernon2006 4 years ago
you need lighting and color corrections.
pimpmendoza 4 years ago
dude you're so retarded.. just quit in life mkay?
701ohs 4 years ago 2
1080/24p? you mean 24fps, not that it recorded 1080 progressive at 24fps, right? I can tell from the moving shots that it's 1080i at 24fps. it becomes a pain in the ass when compositing. looks great though, didn't mean to be a diva over here....
LordMcmontegue 4 years ago
I'm sure he meant 24p, When you shoot on DVCPRO HD, you mean business.
JoeyRythem 4 years ago
35mm adapter ?
basslinegenerator 4 years ago
great depth of field. excellent framing
jfvvideos 4 years ago
excellent!
sarcgyath 4 years ago
FOCUS!!!!
walkingfauxpas 4 years ago
focus on shuttin the fuck up
701ohs 4 years ago
so you can change the hvx200 lenses? or you add another in front of the camera?
gargagara 4 years ago
sick! looks great. Which lens did you use and where was this shot?
ona1r 4 years ago
Check my own test : watch?v=DKKm0hTq7WQ
arcanosai 4 years ago
It truely is all about the lens
timefilm 4 years ago
where did you get the stuff and how much did it cost
?
xxDavidCopperCrunkxx 4 years ago
Again, great stuff! which adapter did you use?
alonso1527 4 years ago
damn you got the hvx. i have a sony hdr fx1
Masonbwashere 4 years ago
So I'm assuming you had no lights present at all there, correct?
archimmes 4 years ago
ApesAPopin I had a completely different expierence - the Redrock rocked our production and gave us better results than the mini35. maybe you got a bad unit. I looked at the P+S and Redrock side by side at NAB and the Redrock had a better picture
starlightfilms9 4 years ago
Looks good.
alonso1527 4 years ago
i shot this, check out tandem in my videos for better looking footage. i will upload more for you, including the upcoming BING BONG BROTHERS short film.
Wartez 4 years ago
What do you use in post to get good color and blacks?
tkmslee 4 years ago
holu SHIT, looks like a real fucking movie
SCHIZOPHRENlC 4 years ago
Nice depth of field, and perfect shutter!!!
alecton 4 years ago
Hello:
Where can you buy the Panasonic AG HVX200 35mm SLR camera lens adapter from? This is great quality. Let me know, thanks.
Scott
oxforduniversity 4 years ago
A new HVX-200 is about $6500 and the Redrock Micro kit is about $2300.
You can probably get them at B&H photo.
-MGM
MysteryGuitarMan 4 years ago
google "redrock 35mm" best one out there for the price...and go with nikon lenses...
WillBraden 4 years ago
The Redrock sucks. Just shot a feature with it and it kept loosing focus and the lens mount is just a huge pain. It doesn't even have real glass in the thing. It's plastic. The only 35 adapter that is worth anything is the Mini 35.
It is expensive but you pay for quality. The redrock is a cheap piece of junk you could build yourself for even less than they want for it.
ApesAPopin4 4 years ago
sure, the redrock is designed for lower budgets, and is therefore a little more cheaply built. but that just means you have to have people on it that pay close attention and can work with it properly. a good focus puller, a good camera tech. I've used it a few times and had zero problems. not fair to call it a piece of junk just becuse you had some trouble using it. for a great demo, google: redrock studio monthly test
WillBraden 4 years ago
Glad you had a good experience with it. But we had a great focus puller, and camera crew. We had to multiple time take it apart to fix it cause it is cheap. For low budgets go for it, but if you can squeeze the extra money for the Mini 35 I'd say do it. When you are working so inexpensively to begin with spending time dealing with problems due to things like the 35 adapter it can end up costing you even more than it would to rent the Mini 35 to begin with. What camera where you using it on?
ApesAPopin4 4 years ago
hvx200. we had a full set of lenses, 85, 105, 25...never had a single problem with setup, use, or breakdown...all of our shots were locked down, perhaps that was the difference. were you sing a rig or *gak* hand held at all? it may be that the redrock just doesn't like being jostled at all...
WillBraden 4 years ago
Could be it. But still thats pretty bad for what it is supposed to do. In the end it really just comes down to the glass you put in front of it. But we where more or less all handheld.
ApesAPopin4 4 years ago
thats good man do you have any problems with low light with the camera?
stev3lar2mie 4 years ago
Holy crap that awsome. and with 60p it could look insane. My mouth waters.
getonitman20 4 years ago
I want one.... but i'm too poor... damn :/
maolyn666 4 years ago
wow not bad! looks like a real film footage :D awesome camera!
superkimsay 4 years ago
looks beautimous
bkennedy 4 years ago
woooooooooooooooahhhhhhhhhhhh awesome! thanks for posting!
KN1V35X 4 years ago
If you can cup your eye to block out the white background from this site, you can see a bit more detail -enough to see a buzzed actor when he pulls his head back. Otherwise, it's a very dark film. I think contrast looks fine. But probably wasn't shot w/ the YouTube venue in mind;)
Integr8d 4 years ago
VERY nice. It's good to see too because most HVX stuff out there looks far too much like video in my opinion. It seems like the blues always look like bright purple, the reds look far too red - the colors just pop too much --- This looks great though. Very film like. Nice work.
bbcasting 4 years ago
excelent look
djmelucho 4 years ago
Not bad, like the sound its important to have good sound, Want to see more
Longman 4 years ago
The end of the film looks so film like. This is the only video on YouTube that achieved this type of quality.
AestheticIndulgence 5 years ago
JVC HD100 is a cheeper camera and the DP for the TV show 24 says it best looks like film out of all the HD prosumer cams. The new sony should be nice
danbozin 5 years ago
too contrasty for my taste
cagwa 5 years ago
was the adapter you used the M2? Which SLR lenses did you use? Pix look great.
misc22 5 years ago
Who is that hot boy? Give me his digits.
smash271 5 years ago
is that you Joe Clark? :)
jimmydushku 4 years ago
where did all the details in the blacks go? did you do anything to raise the contrast that much? need to be careful especially in dark spots like the ones shown in the movie. the adapter and the lens probably ate up a lot of light...
nundale 5 years ago