I have a couple of Jump Jets (one on RF and one still with IR) and have been tempted to get a Flying Saucer but haven't yet. From what I've read I think the Flying Saucer would struggle to carry an RF receiver, even without the foam body.
I'd like to see one available that has counter rotating props like the Flying Saucer but is slightly bigger than the Jump Jet so it can comfortably carry a camera.
Just to correct you there, Entecho's vehicles don't employ the Coanda Effect as much as you may first think. They employ a radial drum fan that pumps the air underneath the peripheral skirt, not over the top. Although the flow does attach to the lower duct surface, the majority of the lift force is on the upper skirt.
Unfortunately we've been so busy flight testing the Mupod lately we've neglected to update our website, but we do have an update planned soon, so keep an eye on it!
Yes I have scoured all the pictures and information available on your first test craft and I noticed the drum fan exits both below and slightly above the upper curved surface and I wondered if this was intended for taking advantage of the Coanda effect - which, based on my own experience would be a good way to go for extra lift. I have been following another company based here in England called GFS Projects Ltd. Take a look at their website, if you haven't already....
They also stopped updating their website last September and I based my design around theirs. I am looking at working towards a degree in aeronautical engineering as my current career is dull dull dull and I enjoy this project
Hi, I am one of the Coanda UAV builders and I can see that Entecho's design uses this effect. I have been keeping an eye on their website for nearly a year and they have not updated it. I assume the craft they build is either not successful or they need to withhold information to prevent competition. Do you have any information regarding how they are doing?
Just been doing some reading and found that ESC has to be updated quite quickley. Typical ESC's are about 50Hz. Did you find this fast enough or did you go for faster?
I thought I replied to this earlier but it mustn't have sent.
Yes, ESCs are typically 50Hz, which is barely adequate for active stability control of a quadrotor, however most can be operated as high as 300Hz. Depending on the size and inertia of your quad, there is a point of diminishing returns with increasing frequency. I found 100Hz was noticeably better than 50Hz, however I found negligible improvement after that. Smaller quads however do benefit from the higher frequencies.
I have been trying to find some video of the prototype Hoverpod that entecho have produced in flight. Any sugestions. From the articles i have read it looks very cool, can't wait ot see one in the flesh.
We haven't released any of our flight test videos yet, but keep an eye on the Entecho website, as that is where it will appear first when we're ready to go public.
Thanks Josh for the prompt response, i have been checking the website every couple of weeks. Good luck with the research and i hope to see them flying around soon.
I am also looking into making a quadrotor. I was just wondering how you went about choosing the right motors and props and how to decide on having gearing and what ratio.
Excellent work. Could you post some more videos about it? Is it intended for aereal photography? So less acrobatics and more stable? Thanks for charing
Thank you! Yes, it was originally intended for aerial video and photography. I have some onboard video footage somewhere... I will try dig it up and post it for you. Cheers!
Hi Josh, thanks for your videos. I´m the spanish dentist again.
I posted a couple myself playing with the thinkgeek UFO. Have you tried it?
GRAUMAURO 3 years ago
Hi,
I have a couple of Jump Jets (one on RF and one still with IR) and have been tempted to get a Flying Saucer but haven't yet. From what I've read I think the Flying Saucer would struggle to carry an RF receiver, even without the foam body.
I'd like to see one available that has counter rotating props like the Flying Saucer but is slightly bigger than the Jump Jet so it can comfortably carry a camera.
Cheers,
Josh
JoshPsDVProductions 3 years ago
200gram payload:
1 * electric motor with brushcutter rotor
stick the mower underneath the qtar and mow the lawn.
I make rc lawnmowers.
Yours would be the ultimate though.
daveymilla 3 years ago
Well I'd recommend it. Aerospace engineering is a very exciting, sometimes challenging but inevitably rewarding career.
"Happiness comes from engaging in activities just beyond our skill level."
(Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi)
Cheers,
Josh
JoshPsDVProductions 3 years ago
Hi trikovich,
Just to correct you there, Entecho's vehicles don't employ the Coanda Effect as much as you may first think. They employ a radial drum fan that pumps the air underneath the peripheral skirt, not over the top. Although the flow does attach to the lower duct surface, the majority of the lift force is on the upper skirt.
Unfortunately we've been so busy flight testing the Mupod lately we've neglected to update our website, but we do have an update planned soon, so keep an eye on it!
JoshPsDVProductions 3 years ago
Yes I have scoured all the pictures and information available on your first test craft and I noticed the drum fan exits both below and slightly above the upper curved surface and I wondered if this was intended for taking advantage of the Coanda effect - which, based on my own experience would be a good way to go for extra lift. I have been following another company based here in England called GFS Projects Ltd. Take a look at their website, if you haven't already....
trikovich 3 years ago
They also stopped updating their website last September and I based my design around theirs. I am looking at working towards a degree in aeronautical engineering as my current career is dull dull dull and I enjoy this project
trikovich 3 years ago
Hi, I am one of the Coanda UAV builders and I can see that Entecho's design uses this effect. I have been keeping an eye on their website for nearly a year and they have not updated it. I assume the craft they build is either not successful or they need to withhold information to prevent competition. Do you have any information regarding how they are doing?
trikovich 3 years ago
Hi Josh its me again
Just wondering how fast your ESC's were. Typical ones take 50Hz, did you find this fast enough?
cannedpies 3 years ago
ok my internet connection was playn up an i ddnt thnk the first comment went through.
sorry bout the double post
cannedpies 3 years ago
Hi Josh me again
Just been doing some reading and found that ESC has to be updated quite quickley. Typical ESC's are about 50Hz. Did you find this fast enough or did you go for faster?
Thanks
cannedpies 3 years ago
Hi cannedpies,
I thought I replied to this earlier but it mustn't have sent.
Yes, ESCs are typically 50Hz, which is barely adequate for active stability control of a quadrotor, however most can be operated as high as 300Hz. Depending on the size and inertia of your quad, there is a point of diminishing returns with increasing frequency. I found 100Hz was noticeably better than 50Hz, however I found negligible improvement after that. Smaller quads however do benefit from the higher frequencies.
JoshPsDVProductions 3 years ago
Hi Josh,
I have been trying to find some video of the prototype Hoverpod that entecho have produced in flight. Any sugestions. From the articles i have read it looks very cool, can't wait ot see one in the flesh.
Cheers,
Trent
trenteva 3 years ago
Hi Trent,
We haven't released any of our flight test videos yet, but keep an eye on the Entecho website, as that is where it will appear first when we're ready to go public.
Cheers,
Josh
JoshPsDVProductions 3 years ago
Thanks Josh for the prompt response, i have been checking the website every couple of weeks. Good luck with the research and i hope to see them flying around soon.
Cheers,
Trent
trenteva 3 years ago
Hey man
I am also looking into making a quadrotor. I was just wondering how you went about choosing the right motors and props and how to decide on having gearing and what ratio.
thanks heaps
cannedpies 3 years ago
Hi cannedpies,
These days, with the cost and performance of brushless outrunners, you shouldn't even be thinking about a gearbox.
Cheers,
Josh
JoshPsDVProductions 3 years ago
From memory, it's dry weight was around 600 grams, MTOW was about 1.2kg, and max thrust was about 2kg.
The batteries were 3 cell lithium polymer, with a choice of capacity from 2 to 4Ah, depending on payload.
Cheers!
JoshPsDVProductions 4 years ago
Nice. Well done.
BackwardTechnologies 4 years ago
well your design is good check my flying turtle
mountainLeader001 4 years ago
Excellent work. Could you post some more videos about it? Is it intended for aereal photography? So less acrobatics and more stable? Thanks for charing
duncandrake 4 years ago
sharing* :(
duncandrake 4 years ago
Thank you! Yes, it was originally intended for aerial video and photography. I have some onboard video footage somewhere... I will try dig it up and post it for you. Cheers!
JoshPsDVProductions 4 years ago
Excellent!!! Be sure to check out the video on my page!
projectcyclopsrpv 5 years ago