Zionist False Flag Operations:1946 Bombing of King David Hotel,Israelis dressed as Arabs 1954 Levone Affair, Israelis blew up American Instillations in Cairo to blame Egypt 1967 USS Liberty attacked by Israelis,34 Americans killed 170 wounded, to blame Egypt 1968 US Embassy attacked by Israeli commandos in Amman, to blame Jordan 1986 Berlin Disco bombing by Israel, to blame Lybia 2001 Israel attacks on 9/11.1st blamed on Palestinians by Mossad Agents Caught on scene. 911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌
@dumbtwoofers ~ I can justify by seeing my videos get 10 additional dislikes in less than 24 hours. So, okay, let's see what happens. I won't block you anymore. Let's see what happens to the dislikes. I think you ought to "Like" them to make up for the dislikes you ran up.
@Mr4therealtruth ~ "I just want a fair debate" Ha ha!! That's funny!
Why did the dislikes of my video "The Big Picture of the New World Order" go from zero dislikes in six months to ten dislikes in 24 hours? It's not THAT big of a deal to me to have dislikes, I just don't like underhanded BS.
Why are you a debunker:
A) To protect your job?
B) Too weak to admit the TRUTH? Too cowardly to be unpopular.
C) To protect Israel? (Mossad implemented 9/11; it was mutually beneficial)
Now I know who was running up the 'Dislikes' on my videos. It was the douchebag @911truthcensor. What a scumball! I allow free access to my channel and this is what I get in return.
@911truthcensors ~ Debunkers always want to accuse someone of lying. Maybe she just has incorrect information. I have learned things that make prior information incorrect, although I've never seen anything that makes the OS not full of lies, omissions, and deceits.
Two papers by Jim Hoffman explain nano-thermites as explosives:
1. "Thermitic Pyrotechnics in the WTC Made Simple"
2. "Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives"
@ae911truthcensors ~ That's not exactly correct. Nano-thermite can be used as an incendiary or an explosive, depending on modifications. This paper explains it well:
"Thermitic Pyrotechnics in the WTC Made Simple" by Jim Hoffman (Just Google the title to find the paper- that's the easiest way).
BTW @ae911truthcensors, some butthead debunker has been running up the dislikes on my videos, so although I don't know if it was you, I'm going to have to block you. Sorry if it wasn't you.
@ae911truthcensors I didn't get QUIET, ae911, I'm simply done with this argument. I DID speak to a first responder. HE WAS privy to the air test results. HE IS suffering from the effects (expecting lung cancer next). Why do I take his word for it? Because I have gotten OTHER information from a forum to which I belong. Your sarcasm does not assist your argument. I never said the "internet is 100% correct), I have a post graduate degree, I'm not an idiot. The END, ok?
@ae911truthcensors Well I COULD give you the man's name and phone number but I will NOT. He was a Sgt. in NYPD and actually wrote policy. He said the air was tested and there was evidence of plastic explosives and he's not the first place I've heard that from. I mention Palestine because there is sufficient cause to believe the Mossad was involved in this "attack". Where do I get my information? From online sources. Where does the Mossad come from? Israel. Do the math.
Your lying. You don't know anyone. Firist Responders can't identify un-ignited thermite."
I am NOT an anti-semite, I am reporting the truth: mossad was involved, you apparently aren't aware of the atrocities being committed by Israel against Palestinians. And yes I DO know a first responder. He didn't test the air himself! He saw the RESULTS.
@ae911truthcensors I know for A FACT that thermite was in the air at ground zero because I spoke to FIRST RESPONDER who was on the scene throughout the recovery process, who was a NYPD high ranking cop. Why won't Jones/Harret share their samples? For the SAME REASON Goebbels et al didn't SHARE information regarding the extermination of Jews, Catholic priests and political dissidents. HOW can you be so disingenuous?
@ae911truthcensors ~ I know you are not being nasty. I was thinking that before I read those words. That's good-- I appreciate it.
To be honest, I don't know why "somebody" hasn't pressed for a criminal lawsuit. That is my lottery fantasy: Set aside a million or two for the family, and use whatever is left that might be necessary to get 9/11 Justice. But there may be a reason.
Can any citizen press criminal charges? I don't know. (to continue)
It looks like the Judge who has juridiction over 9/11 re WTC deaths is crooked. He is a hardcore Zionist who appears to have helped smuggle guns to Israel in 1956, during the Suez Canal Crisis, at a time when shipping arms to Israel from the U.S. was banned. He/ they did it via Mexico City.
He was the judge who provided for a multi-billion dollar windfall for WTC leaseholder Silverstein, who is also a Zionist with ties to Netanyahu.
@ucancallmeOh : excellent video. We're still trying to get the truth about the murder of JFK! NO hope there, NO hope here either. Despite all the statements by scientists and demolitions experts, et al, all the government has to do is REMAIN MUTE and it's what they're doing, standing behind the story of their "study" which had as its leadership people who are pro-Israel. And this isn't the last thing that will happen. Without uprising of citizenry (not likely) they will get away with it.
@ae911truthcensors Make a scientific point. Show some math. Talk to the arguement and not to me you dirty little shill bitch. Whats it like preteding to be a man? Disgusting primate. You have no arguement. You are disqualifed LOL> because you HAVE no point. You seek to attack me and not science the ISDAC. It dont matter. 2+2=4. Your reply - Yo Momnma. Thats the only reply a shill bitch has. LoL. Scum. See u around Traitor. I will pay soldiers to find you under law.
@ae911truthcensors Yea. You best be sure of what the fuck you are talking about. Complicit treason is a crime that has no statute of limitations. Ive had enough of hate mongering terrorists like yourself that cant do grade 5 science. So shut up you dirty coward half man and move along. If you had a reasonalbe grown up point you would have made it. You attack me. You prove you are a failure and have nothing. Its too easy to defeat you. You are too ridiculous to take serious.
@ae911truthcensors Working with the ICC &any other agency on earth. The last thing this former soldier will do. Is to put scum like you in re education camps. Get rdy. Boy. Little mouthy boy. Complicit traitor. Coward. There is no statute of limitations on your crimes. Be sure what you speak or its slander & hate speach. I have evidence for court. You have a mouth like a bitch. See u around. For sure. Ive had enough of hate mongering psychos who have nothing but mouth off like little girls.
@ae911truthcensors Shut up you dirty half man coward. You are not qualified dime store hack from the net. Fuck off shill. The proof is out. Now the only thing to do is fix the world and hunt down complicit traitors that cant do grade 5 science like you. Cowards that talk tough over the net. I would clean your clock junior. 4 years combat training and 23 years martial arts training. You dont stand a chance. Why dont you grow up and fuck off. Ditry coward. Indirect Semi Direct Aerosol campaign.
@ae911truthcensors How did we go from the fact that jet fuel does sweet frak all to dog tags to flying 600 mph dog tags? Your telling me you dont see a problem there in your attempt? There are no such thing as 600 mph flying dog tags, so you are permanently classed as idot shill. You live in fairyland. Im going to go listen to a childhood favorite of mine. Dr Julius Sumner Miller. I need a dose of brainiac after a heavy dose of Tard.
@ae911truthcensors that is so awesomely freakin hilarious. rofl, & in the other comments. look at it this way snookums dipshit. ive seen your kind before, you produce no evidence, you attack the person. i dont need to prove caca, proof of claim is on you. &you cant answer so you attack, its all you got. so, if u can keep up, i posted a comment to you, but knew my 2nd one would be seen first if i replied directly, so i replied to my own, so it would fall below & u see it 2nd.
@Psy0psAgent figure it out yet. so if you cant grasp this simple concept, theres no hope for you for grown up things. have a nice day. dog tags dont melt in jet fuel. any idiot knows that. dont matter how much of it you burn. and thats tiny thin steel. oh and no matter what, you cant produce a list of passenger families, so im happy watching you choke and flail like a dying beast. attack all you want, you wont produce a shred of physical evidence in reality.
@Psy0psAgent Slow down there partner, he can't follow what you just said in this comment of yours. Theres way to much for him to follow there, he is a deplonker afterall.
@SouthernCross33 I know this. I just toy with the shills. They show me their souls when they speak to me. They dont know it but I am not their prey. They are mine. Its a time waster yes, but sometimes its fun. Most times it just serves to remind me the nation is indoctrinated heavily and I am merely studying the beast as it pretends for a time that it has power. So to speak. Not saying I believe in 'beasts' just a quantifying generalization of the mass psychology as it moves thru this stage.
@ae911truthcensors Indirect Semi Direct Aerosol campaign. Owning the weather by 2025. Go look em up smarty pants shill. Ever read a psychology book? Or do you just tell us what you find in the check out isle at the grocery store?
I like how anyone who doesn't agree with your baseless claims becomes a "shill, troll, or paid govt. agent" kind of sounds a little paranoid.. Everyone is out to get you in some systematic approach.
Just like Chemtrails. It must be a mind control agent in that spray.
@ae911truthcensors dirty monkey. you cant do grade 5 science. i got dog tags that wont melt when a plane crashes & burns. There are no family members of passengers. I got a video by real psychologists explaining why sheep who cant do kids science suffer from cognative dissonance. You are baiting ppl here cause u know what you say is offensive. thats why u end it with 'how nasty' they get. Concrete is one thing you do not know about. I suggest reading a real book instead of a bread & circus rag
@Psy0psAgent So yea, those are the criteria I start from. Dog tags do not melt No family members of passengers. 8 violations of the Rome Statute of the ICC by my country's politicians. Facts. From there I want to know why the Law is being violated and why some jerk off in a suit with fake shoulder pads is trying to tell me to shut up when they cant do grade 5 science.
@ae911truthcensors ~ I'm not paranoid. As I've stated many times, I used to call truthers "nutjobs". Then I agreed to check-out three resources with an open mind. I even told the folks who recommended the resources that I have a bias against what they're presenting, but I will keep an open mind. If anything in the 15 months since then were to prove that the resources that I believe were deliberately deceptive (not an occassional error), then I would have to re-evaluate everything. TRUTH.
The reason we cannot stop demanding the truth is because they keep marching on taking our freedoms with these false flaggs. WearechangeNewJersey has just won a lawsuit against NIST for 5 yes five terabits of classified footage and documentation...so we're fixing to have allot more information. Great video.. It's now on my playlist. I'll watch your other's as well thanks for contacting me. Please check out my chemtrails and Iontophoresis videos it may save your life. The are on the Attack
@iondetox ~ You, and WearechangeNewJersey are what this country was built on: people of courage who refused to be serfs for the overlords of oppression.
I didn't know about the lawsuit. I can't wait to learn more about it. And I will check out the chemtrail material as well. I have seen chemtrail videos before -- it's real.
Keep spreading truth! If we can work together to get TRUTH and JUSTICE for 9/11, then the only evils won't have a chance.
@ucancallmeOh Thank you for your efforts as well my friend and you make some awesome films. I've featured the first on my play list and intend on watching you others as well. Have you even watched The Arrivals? That answered my questions that I've had for a long time and makes a long of sense out of this overwhelming mountain of evil that we face. Freedom and Liberty has lost it flavor in the past by now we face tyrannical forces that want to enslave us all. Men Can Move Mountains and we WILL
@azar7834s ~ Pardon me for responding since you addressed this to SlackerSlayer. I just wanted to say: I didn't know that. That's a very interesting piece to the puzzle, asar7834s. Thanks! Solidarity in TRUTH!
@azar7834s And that is why the Bush syndicate (cheney rice etc) are coconspirators,,, for their cover up for the criminals, if not outright planned (pnac).
If history is any indication, eventually some vigilanty will be visiting them, or they can prevent that and do their jobs in the (in)justice dept.
@azar7834s And the witness of Barry Jennings clearly seeing the two towers still upright after he was blown off the stairway in wtc7. Then days before the nist released its pack of lies about that building they killed him.
So, If I may throw a little spice into the mix, how does one explain the evidence from ACARS that Flights 11 and 175 were still responding normally between repeater/locating towers on 9/11 AFTER it was reported that they crashed into the WTC Towers for at least two hours?
Why did those two aircraft remain on the active inventory lists of AA and UA for more than two years after 9/11 and why were they never listed as being assigned into commercial duty/operations that day?
@1tonykirk ~ I have no idea why those two planes showed up on repeating towers hours after they were reported crashed in the WTC towers. I cannot imagine how that could be.
An HONEST investigation would solve this mystery. If that doesn't solve it, then a criminal court case surely would get the job done.
Then we can mourn not only for the civilian victims of each country we occupied and bombed, but for the military men and women and their families who have sacrificed so much for us.
@ucancallmeOh On the morning of 9/11, two Comm Airliners matching the type and size of Flt's 11 & 175 landed at Cincinnati Airport. 1 unloaded into a NASA Hangar, the other into another empty Hangar. Suspicious. Airport roads were barricaded, no one was allowed to drive around the grounds for at least an hour. Reported on Cincinnati Radio. The Craft that hit the towers were USAF E 10's flown by remote control. The pods are visible in NEWSWEEK Photo's. "Operation Northwoods Joint Chiefs of Staff"
@1tonykirk ~ I'd like to learn more about this. It does fit right in with Operation Northwoods.
Are you familiar with Dr. Frank Legge's research regarding FL77? It's in Journal of 9/11 Studies, but I don't remember the title. Well, this is coming from me, not him: If a plane did hit the Pentagon, it must have been remote-controlled. That's not the only explanation, but it's the one that makes the most sense.
@ucancallmeOh In "Pilots for 911 Truth's" video "Pandora's Black Box", the group examines the data from Flight 77's FDR which they finally got from the NTSB under the "FOIA".
Running a flight simulator based off this data, "Flight 77" wasn't lower than 439 ft.
In my opinion, "Flight 77" probably released either a cruise missile from it's belly, or, a "Global Hawk" was flying under the Airliner.
The latter would explain the 3 ft in dia. engine rotor and the landing gear. Not much else survived
@MrRexquando What exactly hit the Pentagon on it's newly super reinforced side where the the Accounting offices were located looking for the missing 2.3 Trillion Dollars Rumsfeld announced 9/10/01, still needs to be determined. Having the video tapes the FBI confiscated would be nice.
Regarding the "witnesses", the initial footage and comments declare it as a small commuter plane.
Later, the story was "massaged" by reporters-witnesses who worked for Publishers who also print FOR the PENTAGON.
@1tonykirk So again 104 people saw the plane. Global Hawk is extreme high altitude.
The FDR doesn't monitor things like the cockpit door or bathroom doors. Only pressurized doors were monitored prior to the cockpit doors being hardened.
@1tonykirk What "maneuver" couldn't he do? Did he fly 100KTS faster than the plane should be flown at low altitude? YES but the key is "should" the plane can fly faster than 500KTS at sea-level but it isn't recommended as the risk of catastrophic bird strike is too high.
He descended so fast under full power (5k/minute) he oversped the starbord engine. Again totally possible but trashing the aircraft.
@1tonykirk Do you know the difference between a "flight number" and a "Tail number"? Flight numbers follow a schedule regardless of which plane is flying the route. They retired the fight numbers but I don't know how long after the crashes.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology the premier technology institute in America had a far different summary of events from 911 than these other arm chair want-a-be experts.
tms. or g/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112. ht ml (remove extra spaces)
If you want the truth it is probably a good idea to at least read what the smartest people in America have to say.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology the premier technology institute in America had a far different summary of events from 911 than these other arm chair want-a-be experts.
tms. or g/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112. ht ml (remove extra spaces)
If you want the truth it is probably a good idea to at least read what the smartest people in America have to say.
@ucancallmeOh This is so silly what 100,000 people got paid off to be quiet?
So Georgia Tech?
University of Sydney (obviously doesn't get grant money)
You know very well the chips found in the WTC dust was proven to be Paint by Jones' own work show it ignites at 1/2 thermites ignition temp and contains silicon and koalin. The iron spheres were found in the concrete. None of this adds to demolition. 10 years of pushing this crap and no one takes it seriously..
@MrRexquando ~ You're on-duty again. You've got the late shift for a four-night stint, right?
I never said they got "paid off", as in a bribe. But they know where their bread is buttered. If they want to get that $500, 000 grant they better shut their pie holes and tow the line. In short, they are sell-outs. Not unusual. It takes guts to stand-up for TRUTH, the way Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, Erik Lawyer, Shelton Lankford and many others have. The TRUTH isn't always popular or easy.
up against the premier engineering university in America? No wonder after 10 years of never providing any evidence people are convinced you have nothing.
It was fires+planes and only anti-govt. wack jobs insist it wasn't with no evidence or facts to prove otherwise.
@MrRexquando ~ First of all, I keep telling you: Prof. Griffin is a 'scholar' not a philosopher. A scholar knows how to conduct research honestly and present findings in a way that is open to counter-argument.
As for U. of Sydney: I have no idea. Perhaps you can get someone there to write a paper defending the Official Story. They can submit it to the Journal of 9/11 Studies, which is a open to peer review. So can the geniuses at MIT, Georgia Tech, and the other universities you've cited.
@MrRexquando ~ You don't know what you're talking about:
1. David Ray Griffin:
from Patriots Question 9/11
William Christison (1928 - 2010) –…Before he retired in 1979 he was Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis, a 250-person unit responsible for political analysis of every country and region in the world.
Article 9/7/06: "David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too.."
2. Journal of 9/11 Studies: By having the peer-review available to the public it allows more of the public to access the information for free, rather than just an abstract of it. It also allows people who believe the Official Story to go ahead and make an argument against what the scientists and researchers (scholars) have found. Go for it! And, that is EXACTLY how science should work: in the open, for free, responsive to all criticism.
3. the phone calls: DRG (Griffin) stated that FL77 (Pentagon) did not have seatback phones. Then he was informed that he was wrong. He made an immediate public apology. Then more research revealed that he was right-- it did not have seatback phones. So, Barbara Olson did NOT call husband Ted Olson. The FBI stated that she did not make a cell phone call that lasted 1 sec. or more and there were no seatback phones. Can you explain this?
@ucancallmeOh So this confirms his research is shoddy at best and any thinking seeker of truth should fact check Griffin and any other person trying to push a conspiracy agenda.
If you spend all your time debunking debunkers you will certainly over look the TRUTH in your haste to prove people wrong..
@MrRexquando ~ No, shill, it proves that when he thinks that he might be wrong he doesn't try to cover it up. It turns out he was right, but it's complicated. If you go to Global Research and put in "Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners" you can read Prof. Griffin's very detailed explanation. There were airphones onboard, but they had been de-activated.
@MrRexquando ~ You wrote, "You should try to get your facts/evidence in line before you waste your time on a video. It makes you look silly.."
Okay, now actually READ the article that we were discussing, and you will see that the "de-activation" order was given for March, 2002, but that doesn't mean that all the 757s would have activated airphones until that date. In fact, the evidence indicates that the airphones on FL77 were de-activated before September 11, 2001.
@ucancallmeOh Read it. More David Ray Griffin manipulation "of course this means they were fake" but nothing substantiation his claims. He is a master manipulator.
I showed you the actual work order to "deactivate" (evidence) March 2002 and you want me to believe Griffin's claim with no evidence? He goes on to say they were already being deactivate but this isn't true! I used AirFone service on several AA flights through August of 2001. FACT
@ucancallmeOh I read the article. Just like how Griffin got confused if AA planes even had airfones he doesn't understand how this works. The "new" technology from 2004 is to have basically a mini cell tower in the plane. This has nothing to do with the fact that cell towers can easy reach 25 miles away. 30,000 feet is only 5.6 miles.
** Again I have done this routinely! Great reception? No but short conversations work no problem.
You need to do some fact checking or look dumb-er..
@ucancallmeOh How can I rationalize covering up the truth? I only present facts that anyone can verify. Why can't you produce a work order like I did for the deactivation prior to 9/11? Because there are none!
-- How can you sleep at night knowing you are promoting lies/disinformation that breed paranoia and undue govt. mistrust? You are feeding into weak minded people like Jared Loughner and you know it.
@MrRexquando ~ The technology allowed the towers to reach 25 miles out, not up! C'mon man! You don't think A.K.Dewdney knew that when he did his research?!
FL77 did NOT have airphones.
The FBI has stated that only TWO cellphone calls were connected on 9/11, both from FL93, and both at low altitude: CeeCee Lyles and Ed Felt.
I don't know what happened to the people on the planes, the planes themselves, or what the deal was with the phone calls, but I do know OS=LIES.
@ucancallmeOh So you don't know anything about cell phones do you?
I will save you the hard-core engineering information:
en.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/Cell_site
Again I have made cell calls on many occasions at altitude.
You still seem to be in denial about the airfones. I USED them myself right before 9/11 happened. Show a work-order they were disconnected prior. They don't do anything on aircraft without documentation.
@MrRexquando ~ I don't believe you used cell phones at high altitude before 9/11 any more than I believe you are not a paid disinformation agent. It is just too easy to say, 'I did this, and I did that.' Just like the shill whose name I don't remember who said he was there at Ground Zero on 9/11 and saw with his own eyes this and that... Yeah, right!
DRG is honest. He states that he is not 100% sure that no airphones were active on FL77, but the evidence CLEARLY shows that is the case.
@MrRexquando So you are suggesting that for a fact you were on this particular airplane and you KNOW for a fact that the airfone was activated? I have read both articles and it is my belief that the guy from the airline is being honest. He claims that there were orders for airfones to be deactivated but not that particular plane, he claims that there were airfones on flight 77 but they had been deactivated in March of 2001. Why would you use them if you claim your cell worked? LIES
@Tricky1ish Umm no just like a twoofer. I was flying AA 757s in August as I stated and airfones were still in operation. I used them.
"my belief that guy from the airline is being honest"? OK crime of the century where 3000 people died I think this is a little beyond your "belief" as a source of credibility.
Using my cell phone was NOT on AA flights with airfones but other carriers that didn't have them available (Southwest). I love how Twoofers try to twist everything..
@MrRexquando "OK crime of the century where 3000 people died I think this is a little beyond your "belief" as a source of credibility." I think it is definitely beyond your continuous lies! Show some respect to those that died and stop with your ridiculous fairytales! I'm going to take a stab in the dark here, but I'll bet you have never even flown on ANY airplane! I've seen your type before, you live a fairytale but realistically never leave your PC, keyboard, or monitor. Right?
I have seen you try to destroy fire fighters, etc demanding their union numbers etc.
Guess what? This isn't about me. This is about Truth and your burden to prove the truth ISN'T fires+planes. Because that is the current reigning hypothesis.
So unless you can provide the "mountain of evidence" you claim you have that proves it was other than Airplanes+fires we should all right you off has a bag of hot air.
@MrRexquando Good grief dude! Why do you lie? You did not use any airfones on AA 757s in August of 2001! I bet you have never even flown AAs! Maintennance manuals conclude that Airfones were deactivated February 2001. The work order for de-activation for March of 2002 was for 777s and 767s NOT 757s. Show me proof that you flew 757s in August and used the Airfones. You should have a credit card statement to prove this. If you don't, you can call your cc and they will fax it! Show me!
@Tricky1ish Yes I will right after you show me any evidence they were De-activated BEFORE 9/11. I showed you evidence the orders came in starting in March 2002. Should be easy as EVERYTHING on an airplane is documented.
@MrRexquando ~ You are engaging in deceit...again!
You must know that this article answers that question and shows conclusively (not 100%, but 'beyond a reasonable doubt') that the airphones onboard FL 77 were NOT activated. David Ray Griffin was correct in his initial assertions that Barbara Olson's phone calls did not happen as stated in OS. They did not happen.
“Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners, Response to Questions Evoked by My Fifth Estate Interview”, by David Ray Griffin
@MrRexquando ~ If you have PROOF that FL77 had ACTIVATED airphones before 9/11, then you should show that to DRG (Griffin) through one of his published works or even through a YT video comment. If you REALLY had something, he would respond to you. But you don't have anything. You are talking out of your ass -- as usual.
Why do you lie to cover-up mass murder? Can it really be justified? Just tell me that it can be justified but you can't give specifics and I could respect you.
@ucancallmeOh Really because I am not an expert/philosopher or author. I think this is a case of Dr. Griffin needs to do some fact checking and you need to be careful who you blindly follow.
Griffin and Gage both censored me from their channels so you sheep don't hear the real truth I have to show.
Me cover-up murder? I am not covering anything just stating FACTS which is more than I can say for you/Gage/Griffin who spread LIES and spread paranoia amongst the weak minded..
@ucancallmeOh The fact you don't block me makes you a rare exception and you can call me whatever names you wish I still appreciate you having the guts to have open conversations. :) Gage already blocked me BTW when I challenged him on WTC7.
Just like he censored this guy on ae911 (dot) org /watch?v=ir0vukXoWGU
But on the airfones it should be easy to produce the work-order to deactivate just like I provided to you for March of 2002? These are public records.
@MrRexquando ~ There's only one person I've blocked from my channel, and he was a truther. He was a nutjob. It happens.
I actually enjoy arguing with you. I will refrain from the name-calling.
Re: the video with Abraham Hafiz (I think I got the name right...?)--
I thought Gage was reasonably patient and tolerant with the guy. Abraham truly did have a different agenda. If he wants to promote that stuff, that's his right, but that's not part of AE's message. (to be continued)
@ucancallmeOh So its not what Abraham wanted to say it was the fact Gage selects what he wants people to believe. That is the important part. He (by his own words) censors profile information on his site. Scary stuff..
I didn't bother reading the material regarding Dr. Wood's theories of directed energy weapons after I saw that they were considered not scientifically valid by the scientists who support what AE911truth(dot)org and what David Ray Griffin present. Gage and Griffin offer "empirical evidence". There is logic and reason and the scientific method to their work.
To discuss Dr. Wood is to offer a red herring into the discussion. I refuse to do so.
@ucancallmeOh I agree with you! Woods is crazy. But not far behind Steven Jones (Gage's expert) who is now saying America created the earthquakes that ravaged Haiti.
That's why I keep telling you to be careful of what you believe from so-called experts.
@MrRexquando ~ You wrote, "I agree with you! Woods is crazy."
So, if Woods is "crazy", why would you bring into the discussion a misguided dude who believes in a "crazy" theory and is disrupting someone who is presenting a truthful, scientific explanation for the collapses of the WTC towers and WTC7?
Obviously, this was a straw man argument. You are now exposed for presenting me with straw man arguments.
@MrRexquando ~ As for FL77 airphones, Dr. Griffin mentions the exact work-order you are referring to, I believe in the article: Phone Calls From the 9/11 Airliners, Response to Questions By My Fifth Estate Interview, by David Ray Griffin, GlobalResearch(dot)ca
(Google the title is the easiest way to find the article).
He states that it was from an anonymous source and not corroborated. The prior de-activation of the phones IS corroborated. Please read the article.
@MrRexquando ~ 1.Two employees of American, one was a VP I believe, the other a customer services representative who checked into it, have stated that AA FL77 did NOT have ACTIVATED airphones. They were onboard, but they were not activated.
2. The FBI has stated that only two cellphone calls got through on 9/11. They were both from FL93 and both at low altitude 5,000 ft.(CeeCee Lyles; Ed Felt).
You can talk until you're blue, that won't change these facts.
This is a great vid. I find it somewhat comforting as well as very scary to see people come to the same questions and conclusions as I do completely independantly simply from looking at the events and evidence. On the one hand it gives me some slight reassurance of my few remaining faculties, but (scary) it has also made me face the fact that there are people out there that we have entrusted with our governance and wellbeing that are actively working against both for their masters.
@corvusyt ~ Thanks for the kudos. The only way we're gonna get that fair investigation is enough people demand it. But the lamestream media is complicit in the cover-up through their silence and bias, so it's up to us to show people the truth.
Cass R. Sunstein. He works in the Obama administration and wrote this
“We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”
@MrRexquando ~ Why do you send your new evidence, hot off the presses, to me? Why not send it to Richard Gage himself? Why does NIST forbid the public from seeing the computer model they used for their analysis of WTC 7's demolition...collapse? I've seen your video -- it shows a pile of rubble, which proves NOTHING. Why are paid disinfo agents making comments on truther videos?
@ucancallmeOh Richard isn't taking my phone calls or answering my e-mails.
As you can see watch?v=ir0vukXoWGU he doesn't like new information. Nor do you.
** The pile of rubble is the key. A 9 story chunk in tact laying across Barclay street. Not straight down/symmetrical/in its own footprint. The 3 pillars of Gage's argument.
Show it couldn't have been controlled demolition.
The computer model. That's obvious. It is the blue-print to take down a building.
@MrRexquando ~ Your video is ridiculous. You are a clown. For 14 and a half minutes we see a pile of rubble. There is no other perspective given, no context, even the date is uncertain. Even the shill who left a comment said it looked like it was filmed by a schizophrenic.
You are covering-up for mass murder and treason. There can be no justification for what you are lying to protect. You must know the truth, even though your job is to deny it. This in not honorable.
You have no evidence was any other cause than fires+planes. Where is all this evidence you have it wasn't? You never produce this. You get your information on what to believe from a philosopher. Take a look in the mirror.. you've been brainwashed.
Truth rules. The rubble pile show Richard Gage is lying and your silly for following him blindly. That simple..
@MrRexquando ~ You have a limited vocabulary, MrRexquando. Dr. Griffin is a theologian and a scholar, not a philosopher. He has done research that has been praised by former CIA people, including a Director.
As for AE911Truth, you're simply trying to be cute. Out of 1,600 listed, there may be a few whose credentials may have been a bit fudged, but that leaves well over 1,500 whose credentials are indisputable. But you don't want to talk about them...
@ucancallmeOh Props for admit "fudged" I am truly impressed (sincerely).
Never stop questioning either side of the debate. :)
Now for the 1500 just remember only 19 are engineers that actually know about structural loading, etc. And that is out of 140,000 registered with ASCE.
So my question is why hasn't anyone pressed the pentagon for video of that crash?? I too am looking for truth whether you believe it or not..
@MrRexquando ~ I was not looking to impress you, merely to shut you up on that point. You talked about one guy who claimed to have built buildings before he was licensed, although technically he could have been working in the field before getting fully credentialed. I gave you 100. Now, instead of focusing on the TRUTH of the 1,500, you want to imply that I have begun to flip. This is idiotic logic.
Talk to me after you convince Gage, or Griffin, or Shelton Lankford.
@ucancallmeOh I gave you credit for using your brain for once instead of following like a blind sheep David Ray Griffin and admitting to me you WON'T look at any other sources to fact check. But that's your issue.
I don't have to convince anyone. The official summary was produced by ASCE/MIT/NFPA/NIST the burden is on Gage/co to prove it isn't accurate.
Keep believing your 19 engineers know it all. Barasch claimed he built Mark Hopkins Hotel which was constructed in 1926.
@MrRexquando ~ The NIST report is wrong, false, and part of the cover-up of the false flag operation. Like the Mr. Cristison said, (a Director of Regional Analysis for the CIA), we need an international court to hold the perpetrators of 9/11 accountable.
I had hoped the Obama administration would do it, but for some strange reason they've declined. I now consider Obama no better than Bush.
@MrRexquando ~ The evidence is there, you just deny science and expert testimony:
AE911truth(dot)org
Patriotsquestion911(dot)com
Debunking 9/11 Debunking, by David Ray Griffin
The above three sources turned me into a truther. I could no longer defend the OS (Official Story). This has caused a paradigm shift for me. I hope it will do the same for this country.
@MrRexquando ~ No, that's not true. I have chceked your sources, it's just that they are a waste of my time. You've said that you do not get paid to post comments on You Tube video comments, but I don't believe you.
"I thought I could trust Popular Mechanics (although I don't read it) but that was a total cover-up .. and I thought I could trust National Geographic and The History Channel, but they are liars too.
@ucancallmeOh Peer reviewed. Steven Jones refused to have his thermite work reviewed and had to pay to get it published. Then was fired by BYU for this tactic. Still today he won't provide samples of his "dust" to other scientists..
Now he is off trying to prove America caused the earthquakes in Haiti. Be careful who you trust..
@ucancallmeOh I am a LIAR? You are the one who Lies about looking at other sources after you admit to me you exclusively read David Griffin miss-truths.
Open Civil Engineering is "a pay to publish" journal where you pay $600 and they will print anything.
BYU fired him because of this. Look it up yourself..
@MrRexquando the evidence again points to a number of tell-tale specifics that make an intentional demolition of the Towers an infinitely more viable hypothesis - a hypothesis that has never been considered by official government inquiries.
@MrRexquando ~ I tell my kids, "Intelligent people ask good questions." Like the other three videos that I've produced, this video is intended to spark discussion, hopefully leading to action. The few high-level experts I've asked about the likelihood of an HONEST investigation or a court case for 9/11 have all said the same thing, 'Not likely unless the people demand it.' The MSM (mainstream media) is silent and some people cover-up for the LIES of the Official Story, but TRUTH must prevail.
I too think it was an inside job, but find it hard to believe the insiders intended to demolish the buildings, or could have anticipated that happening. Four jet impacts on various iconic buildings would have provided sufficient justification for desired invasions.
@FirstUsedBooks ~ Thank you for commenting on the video. The best resource that I know of for the WTC towers and WTC 7 is AE911truth(dot) org. There are bullet points on the right side, and a video: Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out: Solving the Mystery of WTC7. This whole thing is "unthinkable", but you've already turned that corner. The most likely path to 9/11 Justice is to show others the hard truth.
Zionist False Flag Operations:1946 Bombing of King David Hotel,Israelis dressed as Arabs 1954 Levone Affair, Israelis blew up American Instillations in Cairo to blame Egypt 1967 USS Liberty attacked by Israelis,34 Americans killed 170 wounded, to blame Egypt 1968 US Embassy attacked by Israeli commandos in Amman, to blame Jordan 1986 Berlin Disco bombing by Israel, to blame Lybia 2001 Israel attacks on 9/11.1st blamed on Palestinians by Mossad Agents Caught on scene. 911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌
MrMhashim123 23 hours ago
Your scared of the truth so you block users and delete factual comments.
Censorship is a war crime no?
How can you justify your behavior?
dumbtwoofers 1 day ago
@dumbtwoofers ~ I can justify by seeing my videos get 10 additional dislikes in less than 24 hours. So, okay, let's see what happens. I won't block you anymore. Let's see what happens to the dislikes. I think you ought to "Like" them to make up for the dislikes you ran up.
ucancallmeOh 1 day ago
@ucancallmeOh Dude you can't "run up" dislikes. If you change your ID it remembers and won't let you do it again.
I noticed you advertised on your channel for people to "like" this. I won't but I could play the same game and go to debunking vids.
I just want a fair debate. Deleting comments/blocking users/stacking the "likes" doesn't sound fair to me.
Mr4therealtruth 1 day ago
@Mr4therealtruth ~ "I just want a fair debate" Ha ha!! That's funny!
Why did the dislikes of my video "The Big Picture of the New World Order" go from zero dislikes in six months to ten dislikes in 24 hours? It's not THAT big of a deal to me to have dislikes, I just don't like underhanded BS.
Why are you a debunker:
A) To protect your job?
B) Too weak to admit the TRUTH? Too cowardly to be unpopular.
C) To protect Israel? (Mossad implemented 9/11; it was mutually beneficial)
D) Brainwashed
ucancallmeOh 20 hours ago
Now I know who was running up the 'Dislikes' on my videos. It was the douchebag @911truthcensor. What a scumball! I allow free access to my channel and this is what I get in return.
ucancallmeOh 2 days ago
@911truthcensors ~ Debunkers always want to accuse someone of lying. Maybe she just has incorrect information. I have learned things that make prior information incorrect, although I've never seen anything that makes the OS not full of lies, omissions, and deceits.
Two papers by Jim Hoffman explain nano-thermites as explosives:
1. "Thermitic Pyrotechnics in the WTC Made Simple"
2. "Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives"
Google the titles-- easy. TRUTH.
ucancallmeOh 2 days ago
@ae911truthcensors ~ That's not exactly correct. Nano-thermite can be used as an incendiary or an explosive, depending on modifications. This paper explains it well:
"Thermitic Pyrotechnics in the WTC Made Simple" by Jim Hoffman (Just Google the title to find the paper- that's the easiest way).
BTW @ae911truthcensors, some butthead debunker has been running up the dislikes on my videos, so although I don't know if it was you, I'm going to have to block you. Sorry if it wasn't you.
ucancallmeOh 3 days ago
@ae911truthcensors I didn't get QUIET, ae911, I'm simply done with this argument. I DID speak to a first responder. HE WAS privy to the air test results. HE IS suffering from the effects (expecting lung cancer next). Why do I take his word for it? Because I have gotten OTHER information from a forum to which I belong. Your sarcasm does not assist your argument. I never said the "internet is 100% correct), I have a post graduate degree, I'm not an idiot. The END, ok?
Ellzeena 3 days ago
@ae911truthcensors Well I COULD give you the man's name and phone number but I will NOT. He was a Sgt. in NYPD and actually wrote policy. He said the air was tested and there was evidence of plastic explosives and he's not the first place I've heard that from. I mention Palestine because there is sufficient cause to believe the Mossad was involved in this "attack". Where do I get my information? From online sources. Where does the Mossad come from? Israel. Do the math.
Ellzeena 1 week ago
@Ellzeena
This means Steven Jones is wrong that he found thermite correct?
There is no airborn test for exploded C4 or RDX. How did your mystery SGT. detect it?
Can you show your "sufficient cause"?
You get your information from "online sources" because the internet is 100% accurate.
"@ae911truthcensors ~ All three WTC buildings were brought down by CD (Controlled Demolition). Nano-thermite was found in the dust of the WTC,
ucancallmeOh 3 weeks ago "
So who is lying?
ae911truthcensors 1 week ago
@ai911truthcensors You said, "@Ellzeena
Are you educated on this topic?....
You have exposed yourself as antisemitic.....
Your lying. You don't know anyone. Firist Responders can't identify un-ignited thermite."
I am NOT an anti-semite, I am reporting the truth: mossad was involved, you apparently aren't aware of the atrocities being committed by Israel against Palestinians. And yes I DO know a first responder. He didn't test the air himself! He saw the RESULTS.
Ellzeena 1 week ago
@ae911truthcensors I know for A FACT that thermite was in the air at ground zero because I spoke to FIRST RESPONDER who was on the scene throughout the recovery process, who was a NYPD high ranking cop. Why won't Jones/Harret share their samples? For the SAME REASON Goebbels et al didn't SHARE information regarding the extermination of Jews, Catholic priests and political dissidents. HOW can you be so disingenuous?
Ellzeena 1 week ago
@Ellzeena
Are you educated on this topic?
Goebbels was a Nazi
Jones/Harret are truthers
You have exposed yourself as antisemitic.
Your lying. You don't know anyone. Firist Responders can't identify un-ignited thermite.
disingenuous? Looks like you and truthers are the ones who are disingenuous.
Again why would Jones not share his dust with other scientists?
If this was an evil plot by the authorities Jones would be dead and the dust would be gone.
Common sense.
ae911truthcensors 1 week ago
@ae911truthcensors ~ I know you are not being nasty. I was thinking that before I read those words. That's good-- I appreciate it.
To be honest, I don't know why "somebody" hasn't pressed for a criminal lawsuit. That is my lottery fantasy: Set aside a million or two for the family, and use whatever is left that might be necessary to get 9/11 Justice. But there may be a reason.
Can any citizen press criminal charges? I don't know. (to continue)
ucancallmeOh 1 week ago
@ucancallmeOh ~ (continued to @ae911truthcensors)
It looks like the Judge who has juridiction over 9/11 re WTC deaths is crooked. He is a hardcore Zionist who appears to have helped smuggle guns to Israel in 1956, during the Suez Canal Crisis, at a time when shipping arms to Israel from the U.S. was banned. He/ they did it via Mexico City.
He was the judge who provided for a multi-billion dollar windfall for WTC leaseholder Silverstein, who is also a Zionist with ties to Netanyahu.
ucancallmeOh 1 week ago
@ucancallmeOh : excellent video. We're still trying to get the truth about the murder of JFK! NO hope there, NO hope here either. Despite all the statements by scientists and demolitions experts, et al, all the government has to do is REMAIN MUTE and it's what they're doing, standing behind the story of their "study" which had as its leadership people who are pro-Israel. And this isn't the last thing that will happen. Without uprising of citizenry (not likely) they will get away with it.
Ellzeena 1 week ago
@Ellzeena ~ Exactly. JFK is very relevant because he tried to rein in the Military Industrial Complex that Eisenhower warned about.
All the experts agree that the only way that this gov't is going to tell us the TRUTH about 9/11 is if millions of us DEMAND IT.
ucancallmeOh 1 week ago
@ae911truthcensors Make a scientific point. Show some math. Talk to the arguement and not to me you dirty little shill bitch. Whats it like preteding to be a man? Disgusting primate. You have no arguement. You are disqualifed LOL> because you HAVE no point. You seek to attack me and not science the ISDAC. It dont matter. 2+2=4. Your reply - Yo Momnma. Thats the only reply a shill bitch has. LoL. Scum. See u around Traitor. I will pay soldiers to find you under law.
Psy0psAgent 2 weeks ago
@Psy0psAgent I guess you really are an idiot. Well proved.
Math would be like how physics laws didn't work that day. Go back to Call of Duty. Its the only thing your smart enough to do.
ae911truthcensors 1 week ago
@Psy0psAgent I guess you really are an idiot. Well proved.
Math would be like how physics laws didn't work that day. Go back to Call of Duty. Its the only thing your smart enough to do.
Looks like your a fraud or pawn to the truther machine.
ae911truthcensors 1 week ago 2
@ae911truthcensors Yea. You best be sure of what the fuck you are talking about. Complicit treason is a crime that has no statute of limitations. Ive had enough of hate mongering terrorists like yourself that cant do grade 5 science. So shut up you dirty coward half man and move along. If you had a reasonalbe grown up point you would have made it. You attack me. You prove you are a failure and have nothing. Its too easy to defeat you. You are too ridiculous to take serious.
Psy0psAgent 2 weeks ago
@ae911truthcensors Working with the ICC &any other agency on earth. The last thing this former soldier will do. Is to put scum like you in re education camps. Get rdy. Boy. Little mouthy boy. Complicit traitor. Coward. There is no statute of limitations on your crimes. Be sure what you speak or its slander & hate speach. I have evidence for court. You have a mouth like a bitch. See u around. For sure. Ive had enough of hate mongering psychos who have nothing but mouth off like little girls.
Psy0psAgent 2 weeks ago
@ae911truthcensors Shut up you dirty half man coward. You are not qualified dime store hack from the net. Fuck off shill. The proof is out. Now the only thing to do is fix the world and hunt down complicit traitors that cant do grade 5 science like you. Cowards that talk tough over the net. I would clean your clock junior. 4 years combat training and 23 years martial arts training. You dont stand a chance. Why dont you grow up and fuck off. Ditry coward. Indirect Semi Direct Aerosol campaign.
Psy0psAgent 2 weeks ago
@ae911truthcensors How did we go from the fact that jet fuel does sweet frak all to dog tags to flying 600 mph dog tags? Your telling me you dont see a problem there in your attempt? There are no such thing as 600 mph flying dog tags, so you are permanently classed as idot shill. You live in fairyland. Im going to go listen to a childhood favorite of mine. Dr Julius Sumner Miller. I need a dose of brainiac after a heavy dose of Tard.
Psy0psAgent 2 weeks ago
@ae911truthcensors that is so awesomely freakin hilarious. rofl, & in the other comments. look at it this way snookums dipshit. ive seen your kind before, you produce no evidence, you attack the person. i dont need to prove caca, proof of claim is on you. &you cant answer so you attack, its all you got. so, if u can keep up, i posted a comment to you, but knew my 2nd one would be seen first if i replied directly, so i replied to my own, so it would fall below & u see it 2nd.
Psy0psAgent 3 weeks ago
@Psy0psAgent figure it out yet. so if you cant grasp this simple concept, theres no hope for you for grown up things. have a nice day. dog tags dont melt in jet fuel. any idiot knows that. dont matter how much of it you burn. and thats tiny thin steel. oh and no matter what, you cant produce a list of passenger families, so im happy watching you choke and flail like a dying beast. attack all you want, you wont produce a shred of physical evidence in reality.
Psy0psAgent 3 weeks ago
@Psy0psAgent Slow down there partner, he can't follow what you just said in this comment of yours. Theres way to much for him to follow there, he is a deplonker afterall.
SouthernCross33 2 weeks ago
@SouthernCross33 I know this. I just toy with the shills. They show me their souls when they speak to me. They dont know it but I am not their prey. They are mine. Its a time waster yes, but sometimes its fun. Most times it just serves to remind me the nation is indoctrinated heavily and I am merely studying the beast as it pretends for a time that it has power. So to speak. Not saying I believe in 'beasts' just a quantifying generalization of the mass psychology as it moves thru this stage.
Psy0psAgent 2 weeks ago
@ae911truthcensors Indirect Semi Direct Aerosol campaign. Owning the weather by 2025. Go look em up smarty pants shill. Ever read a psychology book? Or do you just tell us what you find in the check out isle at the grocery store?
Psy0psAgent 3 weeks ago
@Psy0psAgent Took two semesters of it in college.
I like how anyone who doesn't agree with your baseless claims becomes a "shill, troll, or paid govt. agent" kind of sounds a little paranoid.. Everyone is out to get you in some systematic approach.
Just like Chemtrails. It must be a mind control agent in that spray.
ae911truthcensors 3 weeks ago
@ae911truthcensors dirty monkey. you cant do grade 5 science. i got dog tags that wont melt when a plane crashes & burns. There are no family members of passengers. I got a video by real psychologists explaining why sheep who cant do kids science suffer from cognative dissonance. You are baiting ppl here cause u know what you say is offensive. thats why u end it with 'how nasty' they get. Concrete is one thing you do not know about. I suggest reading a real book instead of a bread & circus rag
Psy0psAgent 3 weeks ago
@Psy0psAgent watch?v=pGbEJ3pXwWM
Psy0psAgent 3 weeks ago
@Psy0psAgent So yea, those are the criteria I start from. Dog tags do not melt No family members of passengers. 8 violations of the Rome Statute of the ICC by my country's politicians. Facts. From there I want to know why the Law is being violated and why some jerk off in a suit with fake shoulder pads is trying to tell me to shut up when they cant do grade 5 science.
Psy0psAgent 3 weeks ago
@ae911truthcensors ~ I'm not paranoid. As I've stated many times, I used to call truthers "nutjobs". Then I agreed to check-out three resources with an open mind. I even told the folks who recommended the resources that I have a bias against what they're presenting, but I will keep an open mind. If anything in the 15 months since then were to prove that the resources that I believe were deliberately deceptive (not an occassional error), then I would have to re-evaluate everything. TRUTH.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
The reason we cannot stop demanding the truth is because they keep marching on taking our freedoms with these false flaggs. WearechangeNewJersey has just won a lawsuit against NIST for 5 yes five terabits of classified footage and documentation...so we're fixing to have allot more information. Great video.. It's now on my playlist. I'll watch your other's as well thanks for contacting me. Please check out my chemtrails and Iontophoresis videos it may save your life. The are on the Attack
iondetox 1 month ago
@iondetox ~ You, and WearechangeNewJersey are what this country was built on: people of courage who refused to be serfs for the overlords of oppression.
I didn't know about the lawsuit. I can't wait to learn more about it. And I will check out the chemtrail material as well. I have seen chemtrail videos before -- it's real.
Keep spreading truth! If we can work together to get TRUTH and JUSTICE for 9/11, then the only evils won't have a chance.
9/11 TRUTH ---> 9/11 JUSTICE!
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh Thank you for your efforts as well my friend and you make some awesome films. I've featured the first on my play list and intend on watching you others as well. Have you even watched The Arrivals? That answered my questions that I've had for a long time and makes a long of sense out of this overwhelming mountain of evil that we face. Freedom and Liberty has lost it flavor in the past by now we face tyrannical forces that want to enslave us all. Men Can Move Mountains and we WILL
iondetox 1 month ago
good vid, will try to spread it
alphakraker 1 month ago
@alphakraker ~ Thank you! I appreciate it. Keep spreading truth!
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
Good arrangement of info - have shared it.
ewingsco 1 month ago
@azar7834s ~ Pardon me for responding since you addressed this to SlackerSlayer. I just wanted to say: I didn't know that. That's a very interesting piece to the puzzle, asar7834s. Thanks! Solidarity in TRUTH!
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@azar7834s And that is why the Bush syndicate (cheney rice etc) are coconspirators,,, for their cover up for the criminals, if not outright planned (pnac).
If history is any indication, eventually some vigilanty will be visiting them, or they can prevent that and do their jobs in the (in)justice dept.
SlackerSlayer 1 month ago
@azar7834s their ruse is to fill up the screen with disinfo. ... ignore them.
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@1tonykirk Yes of course because you fill it with BS..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@azar7834s I just learned "MrREXQuando-Quando, is a fraud. Ignore him, he is a paid shill and disinformant.
He doesn't want answers, but only to spread "official" lies, ad infinitum, and fill pages full of confusion.
He's probably Israeli/Mossad.
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@azar7834s And the witness of Barry Jennings clearly seeing the two towers still upright after he was blown off the stairway in wtc7. Then days before the nist released its pack of lies about that building they killed him.
SlackerSlayer 1 month ago
@azar7834s Wow are we talking about the same events? Because you seem to be missing most of the facts.
How many buildings in history have been struck by 400,000 LB planes?
How many steel only structured buildings have burned for 7 hours with NO water being applied?
sites. googl e.c om /site/wtc7lies/wtc7damagecomposite. jp g (remove spaces)
Looks like WTC7 did suffer significant damage from flying debris.
Looks like your theory is full of holes.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
So, If I may throw a little spice into the mix, how does one explain the evidence from ACARS that Flights 11 and 175 were still responding normally between repeater/locating towers on 9/11 AFTER it was reported that they crashed into the WTC Towers for at least two hours?
Why did those two aircraft remain on the active inventory lists of AA and UA for more than two years after 9/11 and why were they never listed as being assigned into commercial duty/operations that day?
WhoopsyDaisy!
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@1tonykirk ~ I have no idea why those two planes showed up on repeating towers hours after they were reported crashed in the WTC towers. I cannot imagine how that could be.
An HONEST investigation would solve this mystery. If that doesn't solve it, then a criminal court case surely would get the job done.
Then we can mourn not only for the civilian victims of each country we occupied and bombed, but for the military men and women and their families who have sacrificed so much for us.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh On the morning of 9/11, two Comm Airliners matching the type and size of Flt's 11 & 175 landed at Cincinnati Airport. 1 unloaded into a NASA Hangar, the other into another empty Hangar. Suspicious. Airport roads were barricaded, no one was allowed to drive around the grounds for at least an hour. Reported on Cincinnati Radio. The Craft that hit the towers were USAF E 10's flown by remote control. The pods are visible in NEWSWEEK Photo's. "Operation Northwoods Joint Chiefs of Staff"
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@1tonykirk ~ I'd like to learn more about this. It does fit right in with Operation Northwoods.
Are you familiar with Dr. Frank Legge's research regarding FL77? It's in Journal of 9/11 Studies, but I don't remember the title. Well, this is coming from me, not him: If a plane did hit the Pentagon, it must have been remote-controlled. That's not the only explanation, but it's the one that makes the most sense.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh In "Pilots for 911 Truth's" video "Pandora's Black Box", the group examines the data from Flight 77's FDR which they finally got from the NTSB under the "FOIA".
Running a flight simulator based off this data, "Flight 77" wasn't lower than 439 ft.
In my opinion, "Flight 77" probably released either a cruise missile from it's belly, or, a "Global Hawk" was flying under the Airliner.
The latter would explain the 3 ft in dia. engine rotor and the landing gear. Not much else survived
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@1tonykirk So you do understand cruise missiles "cruise" from over the horizon right? You don't drop them right by a target.
104 people saw a jumbo jet flying into the building. 26 of those people identified it as an American Airlines jet. No witnesses saw a missile.
watch?v=bMqgFaNvoP8 Great independent analysis and how Twoofers are crazy/dangerous unscientific people.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando What exactly hit the Pentagon on it's newly super reinforced side where the the Accounting offices were located looking for the missing 2.3 Trillion Dollars Rumsfeld announced 9/10/01, still needs to be determined. Having the video tapes the FBI confiscated would be nice.
Regarding the "witnesses", the initial footage and comments declare it as a small commuter plane.
Later, the story was "massaged" by reporters-witnesses who worked for Publishers who also print FOR the PENTAGON.
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@1tonykirk How many footpounds of energy does a 400,000 LB plane going 500KTS have?
(F=M*A) 880fps x 380,000lbs 352,000,000 foot/pounds of energy.
A 204mm Howitzer has only 6,410,000 ftpounds
** so a 767 has 54 times more energy than a howitzer. **
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@1tonykirk Yes of course discount 104 independent witnesses saying they saw a plane.
Although I totally agree on the video tapes. That part is odd to say the least. You should file a FOIA for the tapes?
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@1tonykirk Do you know Global hawk is a High-Altitude drone right?
aerospaceweb.or g /question/conspiracy/pentagon/pentagon-wheel-04. jp g
Looks like the wheel fits an airliner doesn't it?
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando Did you know that the FDR shows that Capt Burlingame's cockpit door was never opened after take off?
"Pilots for 911 Truth" have repeatedly asked for the tapes through the FOIA.
Remember, these are Military combat pilots who became Commercial Airline Pilots.
They say Hani Hanjour could not make that maneuver because THEY can't do it either.
Witnesses can be bought and paid for, period. No mystery here. Independent, indeed...
with a gun to your head or your job on the line? Right.
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@1tonykirk So again 104 people saw the plane. Global Hawk is extreme high altitude.
The FDR doesn't monitor things like the cockpit door or bathroom doors. Only pressurized doors were monitored prior to the cockpit doors being hardened.
Prove me wrong.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando You mean 104 liars testified falsely to protect their Lives and Jobs.
The Cockpit doors are monitored by the FDR for Security and Protection purposes.
Only frauds resort to lies for "evidence".
Cab Driver, Lloyd England has recanted his testimony , BTW. Says he was put up to it by the FBI.
1tonykirk 1 month ago
@1tonykirk Show me where prior to 9/11 FDR's had a channel to monitor the cockpit door. Should be easy as you are so knowledgeable..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando "Show me where prior to 9/11 FDR's had a channel to monitor the cockpit door. "
Yes very easy sputnik,,, the released federal data the Pilots for truth received.
Now go confess your own role in those crimes you zionnazi scum.
SlackerSlayer 1 month ago
@1tonykirk What "maneuver" couldn't he do? Did he fly 100KTS faster than the plane should be flown at low altitude? YES but the key is "should" the plane can fly faster than 500KTS at sea-level but it isn't recommended as the risk of catastrophic bird strike is too high.
He descended so fast under full power (5k/minute) he oversped the starbord engine. Again totally possible but trashing the aircraft.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@1tonykirk Do you know the difference between a "flight number" and a "Tail number"? Flight numbers follow a schedule regardless of which plane is flying the route. They retired the fight numbers but I don't know how long after the crashes.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
Massachusetts Institute of Technology the premier technology institute in America had a far different summary of events from 911 than these other arm chair want-a-be experts.
tms. or g/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112. ht ml (remove extra spaces)
If you want the truth it is probably a good idea to at least read what the smartest people in America have to say.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
Israel did 911.
TakeOurWorldBack (dot) com
YouTube video: 911 Missing Links
And the Truth will set the World free!
Sockpuppet2012 1 month ago in playlist 911 Comments
Massachusetts Institute of Technology the premier technology institute in America had a far different summary of events from 911 than these other arm chair want-a-be experts.
tms. or g/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112. ht ml (remove extra spaces)
If you want the truth it is probably a good idea to at least read what the smartest people in America have to say.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ They can't be THAT smart if they can't see with their own eyes that WTC 7 was Controlled Demolition.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh
Really? you think you are smarter than MIT?
watch?v=-UuXFHoX9oQ See how it doesn't match CD? A 9 story chunk laying in one piece across Barclay st.
watch?v=dRKCSmnR3ow Entire floors burning from end to end
Doesn't look like CD to anyone..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ MIT gets grant money from....(wait for it)...the GOV'T!
You want "peer-reviewed"? Okay, Go to:
Journalof911Studies(dot)com
Three articles (that I've read so far....Amazing stuff!):
1. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in WTC Dust..."
2. Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives
3. The TOP TEN Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh This is so silly what 100,000 people got paid off to be quiet?
So Georgia Tech?
University of Sydney (obviously doesn't get grant money)
You know very well the chips found in the WTC dust was proven to be Paint by Jones' own work show it ignites at 1/2 thermites ignition temp and contains silicon and koalin. The iron spheres were found in the concrete. None of this adds to demolition. 10 years of pushing this crap and no one takes it seriously..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ You're on-duty again. You've got the late shift for a four-night stint, right?
I never said they got "paid off", as in a bribe. But they know where their bread is buttered. If they want to get that $500, 000 grant they better shut their pie holes and tow the line. In short, they are sell-outs. Not unusual. It takes guts to stand-up for TRUTH, the way Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, Erik Lawyer, Shelton Lankford and many others have. The TRUTH isn't always popular or easy.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh
So what about the university of Sydney?
Richard Gage=Architect
David Ray Griffin = philosopher
up against the premier engineering university in America? No wonder after 10 years of never providing any evidence people are convinced you have nothing.
It was fires+planes and only anti-govt. wack jobs insist it wasn't with no evidence or facts to prove otherwise.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ First of all, I keep telling you: Prof. Griffin is a 'scholar' not a philosopher. A scholar knows how to conduct research honestly and present findings in a way that is open to counter-argument.
As for U. of Sydney: I have no idea. Perhaps you can get someone there to write a paper defending the Official Story. They can submit it to the Journal of 9/11 Studies, which is a open to peer review. So can the geniuses at MIT, Georgia Tech, and the other universities you've cited.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh You can "tell me" all you want. You just can't prove anything.
en.wikipedia. or g /wiki/David_Ray_Griffin Griffin is a "process theologian" Which means he manipulates people.
Looks like you have been brainwashed my friend.
Journal of 9/11 studies? Right so you create your own organization to vet out research? That's not how science works.
Griffin is the one who didn't know airplanes had "airfones" when 911 happened. Not even close to complete research. Blind sheep
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ You don't know what you're talking about:
1. David Ray Griffin:
from Patriots Question 9/11
William Christison (1928 - 2010) –…Before he retired in 1979 he was Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis, a 250-person unit responsible for political analysis of every country and region in the world.
Article 9/7/06: "David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too.."
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@MrRexquando (cont'd response)
2. Journal of 9/11 Studies: By having the peer-review available to the public it allows more of the public to access the information for free, rather than just an abstract of it. It also allows people who believe the Official Story to go ahead and make an argument against what the scientists and researchers (scholars) have found. Go for it! And, that is EXACTLY how science should work: in the open, for free, responsive to all criticism.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@MrRexquando (cont'd response)
3. the phone calls: DRG (Griffin) stated that FL77 (Pentagon) did not have seatback phones. Then he was informed that he was wrong. He made an immediate public apology. Then more research revealed that he was right-- it did not have seatback phones. So, Barbara Olson did NOT call husband Ted Olson. The FBI stated that she did not make a cell phone call that lasted 1 sec. or more and there were no seatback phones. Can you explain this?
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh So this confirms his research is shoddy at best and any thinking seeker of truth should fact check Griffin and any other person trying to push a conspiracy agenda.
If you spend all your time debunking debunkers you will certainly over look the TRUTH in your haste to prove people wrong..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ No, shill, it proves that when he thinks that he might be wrong he doesn't try to cover it up. It turns out he was right, but it's complicated. If you go to Global Research and put in "Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners" you can read Prof. Griffin's very detailed explanation. There were airphones onboard, but they had been de-activated.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh No Sheep, (name calling continues eh?) that was wrong as well. They were NOT DE-activated until March:
2.bp.blogspot. co m/_go0r2XYwpws/Rut6XRAnZ9I/AAAAAAAAAL8/h3RSUc1GUjw/s1600-h/F0871+001.j pg
This is an actual work order for DE-activation. March 2002.
You should try to get your facts/evidence in line before you waste your time on a video. It makes you look silly..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ You didn't read the article apparently.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ You wrote, "You should try to get your facts/evidence in line before you waste your time on a video. It makes you look silly.."
Okay, now actually READ the article that we were discussing, and you will see that the "de-activation" order was given for March, 2002, but that doesn't mean that all the 757s would have activated airphones until that date. In fact, the evidence indicates that the airphones on FL77 were de-activated before September 11, 2001.
Please READ the article.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh Read it. More David Ray Griffin manipulation "of course this means they were fake" but nothing substantiation his claims. He is a master manipulator.
I showed you the actual work order to "deactivate" (evidence) March 2002 and you want me to believe Griffin's claim with no evidence? He goes on to say they were already being deactivate but this isn't true! I used AirFone service on several AA flights through August of 2001. FACT
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh Additionally I have used cell phones on private planes and airliners above 30,000 feet.
nytimes. com / 2001/09/14/us/after-attacks-communications-new-perspective-issue-cell-phone-use-planes.ht ml
So again I think you need to research more before professing you know everything.. (no offense intended)
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ READ THE ARTICLE! The technology for cellphone calls at high altitude was developed and available in 2004...three years after 9/11.
Phone Calls From the 9/11 Airliners, Response to Questions By My Fifth Estate Interview, by David Ray Griffin, GlobalResearch(dot)ca
(Google the title is the easiest way to find the article)
How can you rationalize in your own mind that you are covering up the TRUTH? I don't understand how you can do that.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh I read the article. Just like how Griffin got confused if AA planes even had airfones he doesn't understand how this works. The "new" technology from 2004 is to have basically a mini cell tower in the plane. This has nothing to do with the fact that cell towers can easy reach 25 miles away. 30,000 feet is only 5.6 miles.
** Again I have done this routinely! Great reception? No but short conversations work no problem.
You need to do some fact checking or look dumb-er..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh How can I rationalize covering up the truth? I only present facts that anyone can verify. Why can't you produce a work order like I did for the deactivation prior to 9/11? Because there are none!
-- How can you sleep at night knowing you are promoting lies/disinformation that breed paranoia and undue govt. mistrust? You are feeding into weak minded people like Jared Loughner and you know it.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ The technology allowed the towers to reach 25 miles out, not up! C'mon man! You don't think A.K.Dewdney knew that when he did his research?!
FL77 did NOT have airphones.
The FBI has stated that only TWO cellphone calls were connected on 9/11, both from FL93, and both at low altitude: CeeCee Lyles and Ed Felt.
I don't know what happened to the people on the planes, the planes themselves, or what the deal was with the phone calls, but I do know OS=LIES.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh So you don't know anything about cell phones do you?
I will save you the hard-core engineering information:
en.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/Cell_site
Again I have made cell calls on many occasions at altitude.
You still seem to be in denial about the airfones. I USED them myself right before 9/11 happened. Show a work-order they were disconnected prior. They don't do anything on aircraft without documentation.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ I don't believe you used cell phones at high altitude before 9/11 any more than I believe you are not a paid disinformation agent. It is just too easy to say, 'I did this, and I did that.' Just like the shill whose name I don't remember who said he was there at Ground Zero on 9/11 and saw with his own eyes this and that... Yeah, right!
DRG is honest. He states that he is not 100% sure that no airphones were active on FL77, but the evidence CLEARLY shows that is the case.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@MrRexquando So you are suggesting that for a fact you were on this particular airplane and you KNOW for a fact that the airfone was activated? I have read both articles and it is my belief that the guy from the airline is being honest. He claims that there were orders for airfones to be deactivated but not that particular plane, he claims that there were airfones on flight 77 but they had been deactivated in March of 2001. Why would you use them if you claim your cell worked? LIES
Tricky1ish 1 month ago
@Tricky1ish Umm no just like a twoofer. I was flying AA 757s in August as I stated and airfones were still in operation. I used them.
"my belief that guy from the airline is being honest"? OK crime of the century where 3000 people died I think this is a little beyond your "belief" as a source of credibility.
Using my cell phone was NOT on AA flights with airfones but other carriers that didn't have them available (Southwest). I love how Twoofers try to twist everything..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando "OK crime of the century where 3000 people died I think this is a little beyond your "belief" as a source of credibility." I think it is definitely beyond your continuous lies! Show some respect to those that died and stop with your ridiculous fairytales! I'm going to take a stab in the dark here, but I'll bet you have never even flown on ANY airplane! I've seen your type before, you live a fairytale but realistically never leave your PC, keyboard, or monitor. Right?
Tricky1ish 1 month ago
@Tricky1ish Your so cute!
I have seen you try to destroy fire fighters, etc demanding their union numbers etc.
Guess what? This isn't about me. This is about Truth and your burden to prove the truth ISN'T fires+planes. Because that is the current reigning hypothesis.
So unless you can provide the "mountain of evidence" you claim you have that proves it was other than Airplanes+fires we should all right you off has a bag of hot air.
Evidence/facts rule man :)
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@Tricky1ish Yes I know for a fact they were active. Everything change to every aircraft is documented.
2.bp.blogspot. co m/_go0r2XYwpws/Rut6XRAnZ9I/AAAAAAAAAL8/h3RSUc1GUjw/s1600-h/F0871+001.j pg
This is an actual work order for DE-activation. March 2002.
If these were de-activated prior to 9/11 it should be easy to provide the documentation.
I'll wait for you to research and get back with me.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando Good grief dude! Why do you lie? You did not use any airfones on AA 757s in August of 2001! I bet you have never even flown AAs! Maintennance manuals conclude that Airfones were deactivated February 2001. The work order for de-activation for March of 2002 was for 777s and 767s NOT 757s. Show me proof that you flew 757s in August and used the Airfones. You should have a credit card statement to prove this. If you don't, you can call your cc and they will fax it! Show me!
Tricky1ish 1 month ago
@Tricky1ish Yes I will right after you show me any evidence they were De-activated BEFORE 9/11. I showed you evidence the orders came in starting in March 2002. Should be easy as EVERYTHING on an airplane is documented.
Waiting :)
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando Actually, your link only brought me back to this video. So, no you did not show me any evidence. You only gave me an incorrect link.
Tricky1ish 1 month ago
@Tricky1ish
Sorry about that.. long URL maybe copy it to notepad first to remove the extra spaces?
htt p : / / 2.bp.blogspot. co m/_go0r2XYwpws/Rut6XRAnZ9I/AAAAAAAAAL8/h3RSUc1GUjw/s1600-h/F0871+001.j pg (remove extra spaces)
Work ordr
ht tp :/ /4.bp.blogspot.c o m/_go0r2XYwpws/Rut1MxAnZ8I/AAAAAAAAAL0/PYB0DTgRyyI/s1600-h/M3E1.j p g
Shows when this activity was completed on each aircraft.
Also note Pilots for truth had to "revise" their stance on this with the appearance of F0871-1
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@Tricky1ish
Press release confirming the date and actions:
news.cnet.co m/2100-1033-831093.htm l (remove spaces)
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ You are engaging in deceit...again!
You must know that this article answers that question and shows conclusively (not 100%, but 'beyond a reasonable doubt') that the airphones onboard FL 77 were NOT activated. David Ray Griffin was correct in his initial assertions that Barbara Olson's phone calls did not happen as stated in OS. They did not happen.
“Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners, Response to Questions Evoked by My Fifth Estate Interview”, by David Ray Griffin
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh Deceit?
news.cnet.co m/2100-1033-831093.htm l (remove spaces)
Try evidence/facts.. what do you have???
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh
So did you read this?
news.cnet.co m/2100-1033-831093.htm l (remove spaces)
Clear corroborated proof they were working 100% prior to March of 2002..
Why not prove it was controlled demolition.. you might be more successful than disproving the "OS" as you don't seem to be very effective at that..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh So did you read this?
news.cnet.co m/2100-1033-831093.htm l (remove spaces)
Clear corroborated proof they were working 100% prior to March of 2002..
Why not prove it was controlled demolition.. you might be more successful than disproving the "OS" as you don't seem to be very effective at that..
I know you have responded to other comments on other videos so you are obviously ignoring this immutable fact that proves your theory is wrong..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando
Don't take MrRexquando too seriously. He is only doing what he's paid to do...
muzicmaker2001 1 month ago
@muzicmaker2001 Its so easy to make you look stupid its almost not fun any more.. :(
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando
Most jobs are not very fun, huh?
muzicmaker2001 1 month ago
@muzicmaker2001
news.cnet.co m/2100-1033-831093.htm l (remove spaces)
Clear corroborated proof they were working 100% prior to March of 2002..
Why not prove it was controlled demolition.. you might be more successful than disproving the "OS" as you don't seem to be very effective at that..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@muzicmaker2001
Rex has been doing it for awhile now, too ...
ewingsco 1 month ago
@Tricky1ish Just like a Twoofer I do work/research and show you evidence you are wrong and you go suspiciously quiet..
Press release confirming the date and actions:
news.cnet.co m/2100-1033-831093.htm l (remove spaces)
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh So here is where you come off the rails.
"I don't know what happened to the people on the planes, the planes themselves, or what the deal was with the phone calls, but I do know OS=LIES."
So you don't want evidence/truth. You just want things that confirm your flawed conspiracy fantasy. Plain to see.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ If you have PROOF that FL77 had ACTIVATED airphones before 9/11, then you should show that to DRG (Griffin) through one of his published works or even through a YT video comment. If you REALLY had something, he would respond to you. But you don't have anything. You are talking out of your ass -- as usual.
Why do you lie to cover-up mass murder? Can it really be justified? Just tell me that it can be justified but you can't give specifics and I could respect you.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh Really because I am not an expert/philosopher or author. I think this is a case of Dr. Griffin needs to do some fact checking and you need to be careful who you blindly follow.
Griffin and Gage both censored me from their channels so you sheep don't hear the real truth I have to show.
Me cover-up murder? I am not covering anything just stating FACTS which is more than I can say for you/Gage/Griffin who spread LIES and spread paranoia amongst the weak minded..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ Nobody fact checks like David Ray Griffin. He is very cautious and logical. Have you read his article?:
Phone Calls From the 9/11 Airliners, Response to Questions By My Fifth Estate Interview, by David Ray Griffin, GlobalResearch(dot)ca
(Google the title is the easiest way to find the article)
If you argue with FACTS you won't get blocked from his channel or Gage's channel.
TRUTH.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh The fact you don't block me makes you a rare exception and you can call me whatever names you wish I still appreciate you having the guts to have open conversations. :) Gage already blocked me BTW when I challenged him on WTC7.
Just like he censored this guy on ae911 (dot) org /watch?v=ir0vukXoWGU
But on the airfones it should be easy to produce the work-order to deactivate just like I provided to you for March of 2002? These are public records.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ There's only one person I've blocked from my channel, and he was a truther. He was a nutjob. It happens.
I actually enjoy arguing with you. I will refrain from the name-calling.
Re: the video with Abraham Hafiz (I think I got the name right...?)--
I thought Gage was reasonably patient and tolerant with the guy. Abraham truly did have a different agenda. If he wants to promote that stuff, that's his right, but that's not part of AE's message. (to be continued)
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh So its not what Abraham wanted to say it was the fact Gage selects what he wants people to believe. That is the important part. He (by his own words) censors profile information on his site. Scary stuff..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ (continued Re: Dr. Judy Wood)
I didn't bother reading the material regarding Dr. Wood's theories of directed energy weapons after I saw that they were considered not scientifically valid by the scientists who support what AE911truth(dot)org and what David Ray Griffin present. Gage and Griffin offer "empirical evidence". There is logic and reason and the scientific method to their work.
To discuss Dr. Wood is to offer a red herring into the discussion. I refuse to do so.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh I agree with you! Woods is crazy. But not far behind Steven Jones (Gage's expert) who is now saying America created the earthquakes that ravaged Haiti.
That's why I keep telling you to be careful of what you believe from so-called experts.
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ You wrote, "I agree with you! Woods is crazy."
So, if Woods is "crazy", why would you bring into the discussion a misguided dude who believes in a "crazy" theory and is disrupting someone who is presenting a truthful, scientific explanation for the collapses of the WTC towers and WTC7?
Obviously, this was a straw man argument. You are now exposed for presenting me with straw man arguments.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ As for FL77 airphones, Dr. Griffin mentions the exact work-order you are referring to, I believe in the article: Phone Calls From the 9/11 Airliners, Response to Questions By My Fifth Estate Interview, by David Ray Griffin, GlobalResearch(dot)ca
(Google the title is the easiest way to find the article).
He states that it was from an anonymous source and not corroborated. The prior de-activation of the phones IS corroborated. Please read the article.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh So yes he talked around this issue but again he is wrong and can't back himself up with evidence like I did.
You need to address 2 points.
1. I personally used airfone service on American through August of 2001.
2. Did you read the Wikipedia article? Yes cell phones work at altitude. So both call scenarios are backed up by science/fact.
Additionally I personally used cell phones at 30,000 feet. (commercial/private) so Griffin has some inaccuracies in his theory. EOS
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ 1.Two employees of American, one was a VP I believe, the other a customer services representative who checked into it, have stated that AA FL77 did NOT have ACTIVATED airphones. They were onboard, but they were not activated.
2. The FBI has stated that only two cellphone calls got through on 9/11. They were both from FL93 and both at low altitude 5,000 ft.(CeeCee Lyles; Ed Felt).
You can talk until you're blue, that won't change these facts.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
This is a great vid. I find it somewhat comforting as well as very scary to see people come to the same questions and conclusions as I do completely independantly simply from looking at the events and evidence. On the one hand it gives me some slight reassurance of my few remaining faculties, but (scary) it has also made me face the fact that there are people out there that we have entrusted with our governance and wellbeing that are actively working against both for their masters.
corvusyt 2 months ago
@corvusyt ~ Thanks for the kudos. The only way we're gonna get that fair investigation is enough people demand it. But the lamestream media is complicit in the cover-up through their silence and bias, so it's up to us to show people the truth.
SOLIDARITY in TRUTH!
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
Israel did 911.
TakeOurWorldBack (dot) com
YouTube video: 911 Missing Links
And the Truth will set the World free
Sockpuppet2012 2 months ago
Cass R. Sunstein. He works in the Obama administration and wrote this
“We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”
ClassActionHero 2 months ago
@ClassActionHero ~ Yes, Sunstein is not one of the Neo-cons, but he is part of the evil surrounding 9/11. Thank you for the quote.
Solidarity in TRUTH!
--Oh
P.S. I see from your channel that you support Ron Paul, ergo Ron Paul 2012!
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
The story is you don't believe the OS and don't know why and have nothing to base your disbelief on.
Although you say you have evidence the OS is incorrect you can never provide this.
People show you evidence and you ignore it.
watch?v=-UuXFHoX9oQ
Clear proof WTC7 fell over with a 9 story chunk across a street. Almost like a lower column failed from fires and it toppled over.
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ Why do you send your new evidence, hot off the presses, to me? Why not send it to Richard Gage himself? Why does NIST forbid the public from seeing the computer model they used for their analysis of WTC 7's demolition...collapse? I've seen your video -- it shows a pile of rubble, which proves NOTHING. Why are paid disinfo agents making comments on truther videos?
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago 2
@ucancallmeOh Richard isn't taking my phone calls or answering my e-mails.
As you can see watch?v=ir0vukXoWGU he doesn't like new information. Nor do you.
** The pile of rubble is the key. A 9 story chunk in tact laying across Barclay street. Not straight down/symmetrical/in its own footprint. The 3 pillars of Gage's argument.
Show it couldn't have been controlled demolition.
The computer model. That's obvious. It is the blue-print to take down a building.
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ Your video is ridiculous. You are a clown. For 14 and a half minutes we see a pile of rubble. There is no other perspective given, no context, even the date is uncertain. Even the shill who left a comment said it looked like it was filmed by a schizophrenic.
You are covering-up for mass murder and treason. There can be no justification for what you are lying to protect. You must know the truth, even though your job is to deny it. This in not honorable.
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago 4
@ucancallmeOh Who said it was schizo?
You have no evidence was any other cause than fires+planes. Where is all this evidence you have it wasn't? You never produce this. You get your information on what to believe from a philosopher. Take a look in the mirror.. you've been brainwashed.
Truth rules. The rubble pile show Richard Gage is lying and your silly for following him blindly. That simple..
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ The evidence is abundant:
AE911truth(dot)org (presentations from architects, engineers, and scientists)
Patriotsquestion911(dot)com (statements from experts and witnesses; a must-see)
book: Debunking 9/11 Debunking, by David Ray Griffin (a very respected scholar)
AND...the lack of credibility from NIST and other sources of the Official Story (OS).
OS=LIES. 9/11 TRUTH -----> 9/11 JUSTICE!
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh As we have discussed 100's of times:
6 bullet points on AE911 doesn't equal evidence to any thinking person
His experts are house builders and sprinkler installers and a high-school physics teach who makes math errors
NIST has credibility issues?
The fact you site "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" speaks volumes of your motives.
How don't want truth.
You want to brainwash people with info from David Ray Griffin who is a philosopher not an engineer.
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ You have a limited vocabulary, MrRexquando. Dr. Griffin is a theologian and a scholar, not a philosopher. He has done research that has been praised by former CIA people, including a Director.
As for AE911Truth, you're simply trying to be cute. Out of 1,600 listed, there may be a few whose credentials may have been a bit fudged, but that leaves well over 1,500 whose credentials are indisputable. But you don't want to talk about them...
OS=LIES. Only TRUTH will save us.
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Props for admit "fudged" I am truly impressed (sincerely).
Never stop questioning either side of the debate. :)
Now for the 1500 just remember only 19 are engineers that actually know about structural loading, etc. And that is out of 140,000 registered with ASCE.
So my question is why hasn't anyone pressed the pentagon for video of that crash?? I too am looking for truth whether you believe it or not..
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ I was not looking to impress you, merely to shut you up on that point. You talked about one guy who claimed to have built buildings before he was licensed, although technically he could have been working in the field before getting fully credentialed. I gave you 100. Now, instead of focusing on the TRUTH of the 1,500, you want to imply that I have begun to flip. This is idiotic logic.
Talk to me after you convince Gage, or Griffin, or Shelton Lankford.
Until then, OS=LIES
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh I gave you credit for using your brain for once instead of following like a blind sheep David Ray Griffin and admitting to me you WON'T look at any other sources to fact check. But that's your issue.
I don't have to convince anyone. The official summary was produced by ASCE/MIT/NFPA/NIST the burden is on Gage/co to prove it isn't accurate.
Keep believing your 19 engineers know it all. Barasch claimed he built Mark Hopkins Hotel which was constructed in 1926.
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh Additionally even if you prove NIST report was completely wrong it doesn't prove any other theory correct.
Who would "re investigate" if you had your way? It sounds like you don't trust anyone to do it.
Maybe your like the other twoofers and just mad at the govt. with no logic behind you?
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ The NIST report is wrong, false, and part of the cover-up of the false flag operation. Like the Mr. Cristison said, (a Director of Regional Analysis for the CIA), we need an international court to hold the perpetrators of 9/11 accountable.
I had hoped the Obama administration would do it, but for some strange reason they've declined. I now consider Obama no better than Bush.
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh
So if it such a compelling case it was a cover up how come you can't offer a single piece of evidence it was??
If you can't provide any EVIDENCE it probably wasn't cover up .
Looks like it was what the science backs up. Planes+fires.
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ The evidence is there, you just deny science and expert testimony:
AE911truth(dot)org
Patriotsquestion911(dot)com
Debunking 9/11 Debunking, by David Ray Griffin
The above three sources turned me into a truther. I could no longer defend the OS (Official Story). This has caused a paradigm shift for me. I hope it will do the same for this country.
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
@ucancallmeOh You freely admit you WON'T look at other sources to fact check these wack-jobs.
AE911 is a bunch of people sitting on couches saying "it looked odd"
David Ray Griffin is a philosopher and brain washer
Neither have any credentials in accident investigation.
Debunking/debunking speaks volumes!
You don't want TRUTH at all. You want to just align yourself with these paranoid anti-govt psychos and ignore facts that refute what they say.
Good luck with that!
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ No, that's not true. I have chceked your sources, it's just that they are a waste of my time. You've said that you do not get paid to post comments on You Tube video comments, but I don't believe you.
AE911truth(dot)org cites scientifically proven, peer-reviewed FACTS.
David Ray Griffin is a scholar i.e., someone who knows how to cite references and defend his assertions. That is why a CIA Director endorsed his book.
Official Story (OS) = LIES.
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh No. that's not true.
You are lying:
"I thought I could trust Popular Mechanics (although I don't read it) but that was a total cover-up .. and I thought I could trust National Geographic and The History Channel, but they are liars too.
I trust Griffin and Gage. OS=LIES.
ucancallmeOh 3 weeks ago "
posted on /all_comments?v=VKFiGfW6aGY&page=4
Your a Fraud not here for truth at all..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh Peer reviewed. Steven Jones refused to have his thermite work reviewed and had to pay to get it published. Then was fired by BYU for this tactic. Still today he won't provide samples of his "dust" to other scientists..
Now he is off trying to prove America caused the earthquakes in Haiti. Be careful who you trust..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando ~ You are a liar. Here is a peer-reviewed published work by Steven Jones et. al.:
“Fourteen Points of Agreement” by Steven Jones, Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Anthony Szamboti, and James Gourley
published in The Open Civil Engineering Journal (Bentham) vol. 2, April, 2008
ucancallmeOh 1 month ago
@ucancallmeOh I am a LIAR? You are the one who Lies about looking at other sources after you admit to me you exclusively read David Griffin miss-truths.
Open Civil Engineering is "a pay to publish" journal where you pay $600 and they will print anything.
BYU fired him because of this. Look it up yourself..
MrRexquando 1 month ago
@MrRexquando the evidence again points to a number of tell-tale specifics that make an intentional demolition of the Towers an infinitely more viable hypothesis - a hypothesis that has never been considered by official government inquiries.
superhero6734100 2 months ago
Wow a video that says absolutely nothing. A counted more question marks than any other video I have seen. Wonder why?
If you seek truth why does it seem like you have an "agenda" to steer people?
None of the sights you reference show any evidence of a cause other than airplanes+fires. Wonder why?
MrRexquando 2 months ago
@MrRexquando ~ I tell my kids, "Intelligent people ask good questions." Like the other three videos that I've produced, this video is intended to spark discussion, hopefully leading to action. The few high-level experts I've asked about the likelihood of an HONEST investigation or a court case for 9/11 have all said the same thing, 'Not likely unless the people demand it.' The MSM (mainstream media) is silent and some people cover-up for the LIES of the Official Story, but TRUTH must prevail.
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago 2
I too think it was an inside job, but find it hard to believe the insiders intended to demolish the buildings, or could have anticipated that happening. Four jet impacts on various iconic buildings would have provided sufficient justification for desired invasions.
FirstUsedBooks 2 months ago
@FirstUsedBooks ~ Thank you for commenting on the video. The best resource that I know of for the WTC towers and WTC 7 is AE911truth(dot) org. There are bullet points on the right side, and a video: Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out: Solving the Mystery of WTC7. This whole thing is "unthinkable", but you've already turned that corner. The most likely path to 9/11 Justice is to show others the hard truth.
ucancallmeOh 2 months ago
Excellent work there my friend. Thank you for making this video. I find it very encouraging and hope many many people get to see it's message.
The War On "Terra" Is a FRAUD 911 was an INSIDE JOB.
STOP US LED ILLEGAL WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST!
TyroneSandalphon 2 months ago