"You can think of it as... going from a pencil to a coke can."
While I really like the potential of this technology, I regrettably have to call bullsh*t on this comment. That analogy implies the diameter can double or even triple. In all of the prototypes launched so far, the payloads never expanded to more than 160% of their compact size.
@Jtownlegends Its good to see you have done your research too:)
I exacly know what you are talking about.
Its not hard to understand how the society had been brainwashed by the media and by each other. They have they false idols which seems to be within reach, but even If you get everything you wanted to I dont think you will be happy because your ego will after the next achievement which makes you feel special for 3 days.
@Jtownlegends ok i have gathered lots of informations since i commented.
we already have technologies far beyond mainstream science.
You are right with that first we have to make things work here down here.
But its not really a question of money, i mean the current economic system is quite fake. If you want to learn more search for Project Camelot they have some very eye opening interviews I've been listening to them for a month now. I really recommend it.
@2Luke not sure what you mean. explosions are very possible in space.
There have been nuclear tests in space that have caused artificial radiation belts. Starfish Prime, a high altitude nuclear test, created an artificial radiation belt that damaged or destroyed as many as one third of the satellites in low earth orbit at the time.
Since 1950, there have been 32 nuclear weapon accidents, known as "Broken Arrows." A Broken Arrow is defined as an unexpected event involving nuclear weapons that result in the accidental launching, firing, detonating, theft or loss of the weapon. To date, six nuclear weapons have been lost and never recovered.
LOL theres one about 30 miles from my house down near Goldboro N.C. when a B-52 went down in 1961. Found some of one of the bombs but never did find the core, they finally just fenced in the area and made it off limits.
@The4LA2Baker0 Of course that was in 1962 and there wasn't that many to begin with, if I remember there were 6 or 7 damaged. course this at least brought about new internatial laws about weapons in space a few years later in 67'
@purpleprinc3 I'm not sure that you can have total protection from radiation, as I'm fairly sure more or less every piece of matter in the Universe actually causes radiation. Total protection against radiation would probably be a black hole, which has gravity so strong radiation cannot escape it.
Good protection therefore probably means a significant reduction in the levels of harmful types of radiation, to the point where it is no longer any more harmful than a ham sandwich.
@john1966elliott Did you watch the part where they explained that the fabric was more durable than the metal shell of the International Space Station?
Now you're talking! I've always wondered why they never used inflatable spacecraft. Let's face it, no amount of "metal" that you can cost-efficiently lift up can provide you protection from micro-meteorites etc. Not only that, inflatable compartments can be self-healing based on protective expanding layers.
Same should be done for moon bases etc. Need for metallic/rigid structures is merely psychological and we need to get away from it.
when i read the title i asked the obvious question about safety to myself, but then it ocurred to me that if you get hit by something flying at high speed through space, wether you are surrounded by metal or paper, either way you are fkt.
It was called nasa Transhab search for it, they had to stop research because of bdget constraints, all the groundwork was there and ready to go all bigelow did was build it.
he couldn't bring himself to compare it to going from a single wide to a double or triple wide trailer home?, haha!..well, i still say they really better NOT be hiding 'found' advanced tech while humans continue to risk life & limb, hurling through air & space in planes and rickety shuttle craft vehicles, lol!
I was imaging the animation getting really cute by having that antennae on the satellite poke a hole in the inflatable space vehicle and it goes flying away.
Hey, wait a minute... I only need one person to reply and tell me about no air in space.
My main concern wasn't for actual FLAME, but a fire produces heat, and while the suit said the pod was kevlar-like, it didn't say kevlar. Now, I'm sure they've already thought about this, but I was concerned about it melting is all, which is why I said it needs testing, which the video says they're going to do.
This is the wave of the future, I'm sure, but micrometeors still bother me dispite his assurances that the inflatables perform better than traditional metal capsules.
I hope so, robertgrouston, but I want to see one survive while in orbit before I consider this a really cool idea. Then again, they are planning to test it, so it won't be a long wait. :)
How's that any more of a concern with bigelow's hab modules than with the ISS modules? Fire in a spaceship is actually easy to put out. Just stop the air circulation system and it will go out, because it uses up all the oxygen around it.
The materials used, or at least safety protocols have been probably been developed to deal with that. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't spend this much on development overlooking something as simple as fire hazards.
A fire would be a disaster in a traditional space station too, I'm not sure that a kevlar station is going to be any worse. Doesn't fire poison the air and damage sensitive equipment before anything else happens? :/
True, but perhaps it's there to aid the astronauts in floating to the top floor. It's hard to swim in air, so to prevent them from coming off course in their attempt to float to the top I'm sure a ladder would help. These modules are much bigger than the ISS's modules. But yes it looks kinda pointless, especially when you think of the cost pr/kg to send things up in space, a fucking ladder? Hope it's made of very light material..
It helps to have hand-rails even in zero-G. If you get stuck in the middle for some reason and have nothing but empty space or smooth surfaces to push against, it will take more time to move along than if you had a few hand-rails.
This technolgy looks very promising
dt28469 3 months ago
SWEEt !!!
jaredknightcom 9 months ago
1:12
"You can think of it as... going from a pencil to a coke can."
While I really like the potential of this technology, I regrettably have to call bullsh*t on this comment. That analogy implies the diameter can double or even triple. In all of the prototypes launched so far, the payloads never expanded to more than 160% of their compact size.
EdouardDubois 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good bye man I am your naughty girl mworld5.info
QuenTinIana 1 year ago
we could have been on mars ny now. only thing stopping us is politics
joachim2464 1 year ago 5
@Jtownlegends lol
i said nothing about religion i way talking about spirituality its different
delidani 1 year ago
@Jtownlegends I think the key is to realize that you are not your body nether your personality its only a role your infinite soul plays
delidani 1 year ago
@Jtownlegends Its good to see you have done your research too:)
I exacly know what you are talking about.
Its not hard to understand how the society had been brainwashed by the media and by each other. They have they false idols which seems to be within reach, but even If you get everything you wanted to I dont think you will be happy because your ego will after the next achievement which makes you feel special for 3 days.
delidani 1 year ago
@Jtownlegends ok i have gathered lots of informations since i commented.
we already have technologies far beyond mainstream science.
You are right with that first we have to make things work here down here.
But its not really a question of money, i mean the current economic system is quite fake. If you want to learn more search for Project Camelot they have some very eye opening interviews I've been listening to them for a month now. I really recommend it.
delidani 1 year ago
so there is houseing for mars and the moon
got to start somwhere looks good to me
jcb570 1 year ago
YESSS !!!!! OBAMA YOUR AWESOME!!!!!!
moonav 1 year ago
Perfect for the Mars colony.
493175001 1 year ago
Imagine many years later - The human space fleet of inflatable balloons of death!
TheKryze 1 year ago 3
Imagine inflatable foods, inflatable shelters, inflatable cars, and inflatable laptops.
Forget about the inflatable human beings. We already have that.
greenheadjoe 1 year ago
@greenheadjoe hahahahahah @ inflatable human beings.
AgrivatedKillah 7 months ago
fire and noise is impossible to occur in space... so all those star wars shooting effects in space are all bull... its all in silence!
2Luke 1 year ago 4
@2Luke not sure what you mean. explosions are very possible in space.
There have been nuclear tests in space that have caused artificial radiation belts. Starfish Prime, a high altitude nuclear test, created an artificial radiation belt that damaged or destroyed as many as one third of the satellites in low earth orbit at the time.
The4LA2Baker0 1 year ago
@The4LA2Baker0 what a stupid thing that was to do. It was like giving children matches, its indescribable how foolish this was.
jacksawild 1 year ago
@jacksawild Yes, it was.
equally disturbing;
Since 1950, there have been 32 nuclear weapon accidents, known as "Broken Arrows." A Broken Arrow is defined as an unexpected event involving nuclear weapons that result in the accidental launching, firing, detonating, theft or loss of the weapon. To date, six nuclear weapons have been lost and never recovered.
The4LA2Baker0 1 year ago
@The4LA2Baker0
LOL theres one about 30 miles from my house down near Goldboro N.C. when a B-52 went down in 1961. Found some of one of the bombs but never did find the core, they finally just fenced in the area and made it off limits.
candr 1 year ago
@The4LA2Baker0 Of course that was in 1962 and there wasn't that many to begin with, if I remember there were 6 or 7 damaged. course this at least brought about new internatial laws about weapons in space a few years later in 67'
candr 1 year ago
Good protection again'st radiation? Think I'd prefer 'total' protection...!
purpleprinc3 1 year ago
i'll not tell you about the constant bombardment of radiation from space that occurs in your body every day then?
Perfect64 1 year ago
@purpleprinc3 I'm not sure that you can have total protection from radiation, as I'm fairly sure more or less every piece of matter in the Universe actually causes radiation. Total protection against radiation would probably be a black hole, which has gravity so strong radiation cannot escape it.
Good protection therefore probably means a significant reduction in the levels of harmful types of radiation, to the point where it is no longer any more harmful than a ham sandwich.
ImaginedNation 1 year ago
@ImaginedNation
Careful! A ham sandwich may be deadly if stored improperly!
trutheality 1 year ago
a video on stuff in space and an Irish (i think?) narrator, it can't get any better than that!!
very cool tech also ;p
Intrabeldin 1 year ago
@Intrabeldin Scottish.
Air420 1 year ago
Who could have guessed the future would be something like this. :)
peterthegreat86 1 year ago
Be careful about shower of Asteriods or Meteriods. You can't use Balloon Spacecraft in space. Too Dangerous !!!!!
john1966elliott 1 year ago
@john1966elliott Did you watch the part where they explained that the fabric was more durable than the metal shell of the International Space Station?
Trystera 1 year ago 2
Now you're talking! I've always wondered why they never used inflatable spacecraft. Let's face it, no amount of "metal" that you can cost-efficiently lift up can provide you protection from micro-meteorites etc. Not only that, inflatable compartments can be self-healing based on protective expanding layers.
Same should be done for moon bases etc. Need for metallic/rigid structures is merely psychological and we need to get away from it.
YoLninYo 1 year ago 2
when i read the title i asked the obvious question about safety to myself, but then it ocurred to me that if you get hit by something flying at high speed through space, wether you are surrounded by metal or paper, either way you are fkt.
robertwc82 1 year ago
very good
wallofjustin 1 year ago 2
wow thats an amazing idea! i cant believe it wasnt thought of before, this is the future of space travel i guarantee it
nikobrown1990 1 year ago 3
nasa invented this technology years ago, they had to sell it i think.
Buttmunch5000 1 year ago
@Buttmunch5000 wow and they didnt invest?
thats seems a bit stupid, unless it doesnt work
nikobrown1990 1 year ago
It was called nasa Transhab search for it, they had to stop research because of bdget constraints, all the groundwork was there and ready to go all bigelow did was build it.
Buttmunch5000 1 year ago
@Buttmunch5000 u know ur stuff buddy, nice 1 - they should turn themselves into a plc and see how much the public want to invest in the idea
nikobrown1990 1 year ago
Brilliant.
SpelKille 1 year ago
Good luck getting the program running!
Thankfully Obama like many of us realizes we need private investors/companies to advance space aviation at a quicker rate.
samipso 1 year ago 2
yeah pretty much hoping wall e wont be come a reality lol
Obesity ol
FrostGibbon 1 year ago
Very exciting. :D
Zimy0 1 year ago
Obama's move was smart. More competition leads to better products. Look at the mobile phone industry after the launch of the iphone!!
Chronos014 1 year ago
that's bullshit
kpirooz92 1 year ago
lol....the spacepillow ^^
but as an astronaut I would be a lil scared about what happens when fire comes up in the station.
BloodyBBQ 1 year ago
@BloodyBBQ
fires can't occur in space. there is no oxygen. fire needs oxygen/heat/fuel.
but there are fire monkeys that shit cheese lurking around space. we'll cross dat bridge when we come to it.
jimmytimtom 1 year ago
@jimmytimtom
i meant inside the spacecraft!
BloodyBBQ 1 year ago
@jimmytimtom
What about a fire INSIDE the structure?
BrainSeepsOut 1 year ago
Now we need a cheaper way of getting into space...
TurboDally 1 year ago
FOR SCIENCE!
Nanovirus5995 1 year ago 2
what about shielding? ...
InfinityS60 1 year ago
that is so cool
djsuperstar717 1 year ago
he couldn't bring himself to compare it to going from a single wide to a double or triple wide trailer home?, haha!..well, i still say they really better NOT be hiding 'found' advanced tech while humans continue to risk life & limb, hurling through air & space in planes and rickety shuttle craft vehicles, lol!
11moonelf 1 year ago
0:29
I was imaging the animation getting really cute by having that antennae on the satellite poke a hole in the inflatable space vehicle and it goes flying away.
laserman 1 year ago
Meh I don't think space travel will be real for another 100 years
mozart116 1 year ago
That is pretty awesome.
Shalek 1 year ago
is this why there shutting down the old space station?
Grzld 1 year ago
Hey, wait a minute... I only need one person to reply and tell me about no air in space.
My main concern wasn't for actual FLAME, but a fire produces heat, and while the suit said the pod was kevlar-like, it didn't say kevlar. Now, I'm sure they've already thought about this, but I was concerned about it melting is all, which is why I said it needs testing, which the video says they're going to do.
Geez, over a dozen responses. Really, YouTube?
hgryphon 1 year ago
@ hgryphon: no worries, they just couldn't resist. Friday night is 'snack-time' for many a bored & tired post-work day citizen. :oD
11moonelf 1 year ago
This is the wave of the future, I'm sure, but micrometeors still bother me dispite his assurances that the inflatables perform better than traditional metal capsules.
dafttool 1 year ago
This is pretty sweet stuff! , now wheres my healthcare?
madjimms 1 year ago
@madjimms lol nice
lejink 1 year ago
neat, but do you wash that with whites or colors and can you throw it in a dryer?
bazodee2 1 year ago
irish host?
UncheckedIrony 1 year ago
This is really good idea. I can really see this being used.
leejw00t354 1 year ago
man i hope these will replace iss!!!
plavins1 1 year ago
It's cool of NASA to fund the shuttle development for them.
kilvertm 1 year ago
I want the double-shell puncture resistant model
superfisto 1 year ago
it has a lot of layers. insulation, reinforcements... stuff like that.
Niosus 1 year ago
FUCK YEH
william899332 1 year ago
Should be interesting to see the crew capsule that Boeing develops for them.
qup5 1 year ago
She should be the narrator for all of the videos O_O
bobishigh145 1 year ago
It looks like a cool idea, but... What about fire?
hgryphon 1 year ago 3
@hgryphon : Fire Resistant/Repellant Materials
robertghouston 1 year ago
I hope so, robertgrouston, but I want to see one survive while in orbit before I consider this a really cool idea. Then again, they are planning to test it, so it won't be a long wait. :)
hgryphon 1 year ago
Heat isolator on the inside? The kind that the racing suits are made from. :)
Jockberg 1 year ago
You didn't think they'd include protection against one of the biggest dangers for astronauts in space? It would of course be flameproof.
Athaeus 1 year ago
You never know, Athaeus. You never know. ;)
hgryphon 1 year ago
How's that any more of a concern with bigelow's hab modules than with the ISS modules? Fire in a spaceship is actually easy to put out. Just stop the air circulation system and it will go out, because it uses up all the oxygen around it.
JustAnAdjunct 1 year ago
The materials used, or at least safety protocols have been probably been developed to deal with that. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't spend this much on development overlooking something as simple as fire hazards.
Billtcm 1 year ago
It's probably fireproof.
nintendopi 1 year ago
there isn't air in space, so outside would be fine, but the inside...
eventually there's gonna be a crew in it so they can put out the fire....idk for sure
r0b0leadr 1 year ago
A fire would be a disaster in a traditional space station too, I'm not sure that a kevlar station is going to be any worse. Doesn't fire poison the air and damage sensitive equipment before anything else happens? :/
LordZentei 1 year ago
@hgryphon
I'd say the risks are probably quite similar to a rigid-hulled design. I suspect Kevlar is about as flammable as aluminum plates.
And like the guy said, Kevlar and layers of foam are a lot more meteor-resistant than thin plates of aluminum.
EdouardDubois 1 year ago
no oxigen in space -> no fire even possible
Niosus 1 year ago
theres no such thing as fire in outser space. fire requires oxygen
ace76543 1 year ago
right there's oxygen on the inside....
there will probably be some sort of preventative measures on the inside to make sure that the fire doesn't reach the outer shell
ace76543 1 year ago
things are not easy to burn in space and I am sure they are not flammable.
good point though.
TigerSlashX 1 year ago
sadly, they're not allowed to smoke up there !
(otherwise, what about fire in any closed space in a hostile enviroinment : eg. a small boat in the high seas !)
vincent7520 1 year ago
@hgry, fire? in space.......
themilkmister 1 year ago
Comment removed
mrlips007 1 year ago
@mrlips007 mr.lips007 is fired, retarded and should shoot himself.
valdezmiguel2 1 year ago
AWESOME!!! I love space development in the private sector :)
Doviux09 1 year ago 22
1step closer to space colonization:)
delidani 1 year ago 30
at 0:50 why would you need a ladder. i mean you can just float up to the top.
0871356005 1 year ago
True, but perhaps it's there to aid the astronauts in floating to the top floor. It's hard to swim in air, so to prevent them from coming off course in their attempt to float to the top I'm sure a ladder would help. These modules are much bigger than the ISS's modules. But yes it looks kinda pointless, especially when you think of the cost pr/kg to send things up in space, a fucking ladder? Hope it's made of very light material..
fuunguus 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"at 0:50 why would you need a ladder. i mean you can just float up to the top."
As a guide and so that when the thing is still earth-bound you can actually get around in it, probably.
Cyrathil 1 year ago
It's probably for holding on to and guiding your movement, to make it easier to float in the right direction.
LordZentei 1 year ago
@0871356005
It helps to have hand-rails even in zero-G. If you get stuck in the middle for some reason and have nothing but empty space or smooth surfaces to push against, it will take more time to move along than if you had a few hand-rails.
EdouardDubois 1 year ago
This is a good development!
niiidar 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
zomg wtf haha did you see that shit? haha
OuterSpaceRave 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Penis
Paavo93 1 year ago
Comment removed
PageDown88 1 year ago
@PageDown88 too late
spicyfart101 1 year ago 6
@PageDown88 too late
spicyfart101 1 year ago 3
I hate you!!
aioo86 1 year ago 4