how can you compare a mac with dual core and ( i assume ) with better graphics card. Too a maybe 1 or 2 year old single core ( AND AMD) with less good processor?
@LACK78 but it's not only the processor speed. in 3d benchmarking the graphics processor has a big role too. you can't compare cheap integrated chips with dedicated ones. it's like you would race a blue motion golf and a scuderia ferrari
Rendering 3d doesn't really have that much to do with the Processor man, its more based on the Graphics card.
Macbooks have dedicated graphics cards (currently the 9400gm) whereas those other 2 laptops will have integrated graphics, built into the motherboard. The turion probably has a better graphics card, therefore it will render faster despite the CPU difference.
the apple costs about £100 more has a smaller screen and while good is no good for games >the same sized screen mac book pro cost £700 more,so it seems to me you are comparing apples with pears,not worth the effort and about as scientific as peelin a bannana
Yes that would add about £150 to a £700 price difference.MACS are better but they are much more expensive.That said in the uk they make up 80% of the above £1000 price point so I could be talking shit,again!
3D studio max is a paid professional 3D graphics suite for making movies, effects, creatures, 3D models, gaming environments etc... It's not an application for benchmarks per se. Although it's intensive rendering requirements makes it very suitable. You have to purchase the latest version online.
My old macbook pro (early 2008) would beat daves latest macbook pro for sure.... coz mine is 2.66 c2d + 8600m gt (i know this has less influence on grafics card)....
Yes, just like it would own a previous generation mac. So its not an apples to apples comparison.
Also just to note, the mac is just a pc with a different OS. Look at the hardware, intel board, intel processor, its even running Windows XP, so yes its a PC with a unix flavoured OS.
Yes but OS X is not Unix 1.0. The foundations are Unix and thats a great place to start from. Much better start point than Window's recycled kernels. Also the term 'Mac' even by Steve Job's own admission is just a differentiator for a PC that natively runs OS X and Apple's brand of Computers. Dell's and HP's also share exactly the same kinds of architecture and yet you don't call a HP a Dell and vise versa. Mac users are already aware of what your saying. Thats not why they buy them.
Those Turion cores have a more modern architecture to the old Athlon 64's :)
Athlon 64 was the hot sauce back in its day though, that 2.4GHz Athlon 64 would have killed any Pentium 4 based laptop :)
The comments below irritate me though, the Mac beat the PC's because it runs a better Core 2 processor and faster RAM, the fact it is a Mac is irrelevant :P It's like benching a 2.2GHz Core 2 PC against a 1.67GHz Power PC based Powerbook, the PC would win :P
My sentiments exactly. The test was always going to end one way. It's unfair to say the Amilo's are representative of being a good competition for the macbook. The specs are 3 generations apart. A comparatively priced PC to the macbook pro would give it a good run for it's money if not beat it.
It's not fair to jump on the "Mac is better than PC" bandwagon just because the latest Macbook Pro beat two four and half year old PC's in a video render benchmark.
To be fair we must remember these PC's are very old AMD's and I think their performance was admirable given the competition. There are plenty of modern PC's for the same money that would also put the Macbook Pro in the shade. Everything is relative.
Don't be lazy - take your chance NOW and win Macbook Air. Check out macbook7, c0m!
HewaqQucalu 1 year ago
this is really gay... :S
man wtf?
whats ure poin?
fahrudingoz 1 year ago
THE core 2 duo has 2 cores
iphone3gs78 1 year ago
Its funny how windows works better on a mac than OSX does. Hahahahahaha
FASSY524 1 year ago
How can you have windows on aac???
dq476 2 years ago
Are you from the 1950's or something? Cause Apple explains windows on macs. Boot Camp, Parallels, VMware fusion etc!
FASSY524 1 year ago
is amd turion x2 2.2 ghz 64 dual core ?
21805815 2 years ago
Is AMD turion 2.2 GHz better than AMD athlon 2.2 GHz?
21805815 2 years ago
Less good graphic card***
shplaaaa 2 years ago
how can you compare a mac with dual core and ( i assume ) with better graphics card. Too a maybe 1 or 2 year old single core ( AND AMD) with less good processor?
shplaaaa 2 years ago
Your right it's not a fair fight but thats what we expected. We really just wanted to show how far processor speeds have come in the last few years.
LACK78 2 years ago
@LACK78 but it's not only the processor speed. in 3d benchmarking the graphics processor has a big role too. you can't compare cheap integrated chips with dedicated ones. it's like you would race a blue motion golf and a scuderia ferrari
dbcooper91 1 year ago
does anyone know how to make the screen turn around on a fujitsu siemens p17-1 ? or does anyone know what software to download to do so
................thanks.
zuesk98 2 years ago
@zuesk98 if you have intel graphic card, then CTRL+ALT+LEFT/RIGHT/UP/DOWN
ArtemRomanov 2 years ago
@ArtemRomanov nah tht dont work....now i got a bigger better screen now :D
zuesk98 2 years ago
Rendering 3d doesn't really have that much to do with the Processor man, its more based on the Graphics card.
Macbooks have dedicated graphics cards (currently the 9400gm) whereas those other 2 laptops will have integrated graphics, built into the motherboard. The turion probably has a better graphics card, therefore it will render faster despite the CPU difference.
PapaLongLegs 2 years ago
the apple costs about £100 more has a smaller screen and while good is no good for games >the same sized screen mac book pro cost £700 more,so it seems to me you are comparing apples with pears,not worth the effort and about as scientific as peelin a bannana
CHANNELOMD 2 years ago
put windows on it and they are excellent for games
TecBookPro 2 years ago
Yes that would add about £150 to a £700 price difference.MACS are better but they are much more expensive.That said in the uk they make up 80% of the above £1000 price point so I could be talking shit,again!
CHANNELOMD 2 years ago
Yeah well. Most of us on here use dollars and cents. $ and ¢ not £
FASSY524 1 year ago
but the price differential be the same
CHANNELOMD 1 year ago
what are the cost differences
CHANNELOMD 2 years ago
who the hell is surprised?
kloaneKantn 2 years ago
Do you have a good job? you seem to have a lot of computers/gadgets haha
HollowContact 2 years ago
mbp wohooo.. nice video.. =)
Newbisuport 2 years ago
What is tje purpose of this video? Comparing a modern DualCore Intel from 2008/2009 to an 2006 Single Core AMD processor?
ser4phis 2 years ago 3
you can give us the software link when you make a benchmark so that we can test/upload our score/time too.
r0ssel0203113 2 years ago
3D studio max is a paid professional 3D graphics suite for making movies, effects, creatures, 3D models, gaming environments etc... It's not an application for benchmarks per se. Although it's intensive rendering requirements makes it very suitable. You have to purchase the latest version online.
LACK78 2 years ago
do you work for siemens??
beanzknights95 2 years ago
My old macbook pro (early 2008) would beat daves latest macbook pro for sure.... coz mine is 2.66 c2d + 8600m gt (i know this has less influence on grafics card)....
r0ssel0203113 2 years ago
good grief! but what'd u expect by comparing these machines against the mbp?...they ran a good race i guess.
black2k7r1 2 years ago
The macbook pro owned them so badly it can't even explain it.
Joethemonkey101 2 years ago 2
Yes, just like it would own a previous generation mac. So its not an apples to apples comparison.
Also just to note, the mac is just a pc with a different OS. Look at the hardware, intel board, intel processor, its even running Windows XP, so yes its a PC with a unix flavoured OS.
eeipshy 2 years ago 2
Yes but OS X is not Unix 1.0. The foundations are Unix and thats a great place to start from. Much better start point than Window's recycled kernels. Also the term 'Mac' even by Steve Job's own admission is just a differentiator for a PC that natively runs OS X and Apple's brand of Computers. Dell's and HP's also share exactly the same kinds of architecture and yet you don't call a HP a Dell and vise versa. Mac users are already aware of what your saying. Thats not why they buy them.
LACK78 2 years ago
Foxxcon make the boards, they're just designed by Apple, Intel and Foxxcon to get the most out of them.
TalesOfWar 2 years ago
Those Turion cores have a more modern architecture to the old Athlon 64's :)
Athlon 64 was the hot sauce back in its day though, that 2.4GHz Athlon 64 would have killed any Pentium 4 based laptop :)
The comments below irritate me though, the Mac beat the PC's because it runs a better Core 2 processor and faster RAM, the fact it is a Mac is irrelevant :P It's like benching a 2.2GHz Core 2 PC against a 1.67GHz Power PC based Powerbook, the PC would win :P
Great vid, nice editing 5/5
DeadFredVideo 2 years ago 5
My sentiments exactly. The test was always going to end one way. It's unfair to say the Amilo's are representative of being a good competition for the macbook. The specs are 3 generations apart. A comparatively priced PC to the macbook pro would give it a good run for it's money if not beat it.
It's not fair to jump on the "Mac is better than PC" bandwagon just because the latest Macbook Pro beat two four and half year old PC's in a video render benchmark.
LACK78 2 years ago
nice that pc got pwnd
thewisecreator 2 years ago 3
macbook pro rules screw pcs
Aubietiger43 2 years ago
To be fair we must remember these PC's are very old AMD's and I think their performance was admirable given the competition. There are plenty of modern PC's for the same money that would also put the Macbook Pro in the shade. Everything is relative.
LACK78 2 years ago
woah!! 5 min difference!!! ha ...it is true, macs are alot better pc's than most pc's!! ha ha!
shanec2008 2 years ago
could you do the benchmark between the macbook pro and a kind of pc that you can buy now at the same price of the MBP?
4michelin 2 years ago
4,35 times faster....
4michelin 2 years ago
another great vid
antotones 2 years ago