3:56 - 4:15 absolutely stunning and amazing, this sequence influenced many great composers after him listen for example to beethovens moonligh sonata (especially the 3rd mvt.) and compare it to this,
how he plays with the bass and the rhythm , it deserves totally the attribute "maestoso"
seems like mozarts pool of ideas was of infinite size
only bach and mb handel can mess with him in an overall comparison
Shame he plays the latter part twice, just doesn't work.the dark climax at the end should be final imo. You can't just end like that with all that energy and then just pick it up again and restart it like nothing happened. In fact there is no way to repeat the second half in a meaningful way after that climax.
For me its the same for all the Scarlatti sonatas with repeating sections, where invariably there is a darker second section, which for me is the ultimatum of the piece and non repeatable
@fontinau I think it might just be what you're used to. As I said I am used to the second section being played once, and maybe that's why it feels right that way.
Thank you for shedding light on this matter with your profound and perceptive comment.
@tarquin161234 You might be right, but it's still a very modern point of view. If you compare several pieces from this time (the most impressive example would be the W. A. Mozart - Fantasie in C- Moll KV. 47) ,you'll find always bright part that's contrasting these dark parts. It's all about perfect balance, in harmony as in structure.
@flippert0 He doesn't add notes. He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
@RenatoABabka , He doesn't add notes. He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
@steef689 He doesn't add notes. He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
:) i'm smiling
XDmusicluver 1 month ago
Bravo~~!! Brava.~!! :D
minchelle1113 3 months ago
3:56 - 4:15 absolutely stunning and amazing, this sequence influenced many great composers after him listen for example to beethovens moonligh sonata (especially the 3rd mvt.) and compare it to this,
how he plays with the bass and the rhythm , it deserves totally the attribute "maestoso"
seems like mozarts pool of ideas was of infinite size
only bach and mb handel can mess with him in an overall comparison
Dirkovic80 6 months ago
so beautiful and incredible
charlycrett 6 months ago
Que buena música!! .
daioo7 7 months ago
Shame he plays the latter part twice, just doesn't work.the dark climax at the end should be final imo. You can't just end like that with all that energy and then just pick it up again and restart it like nothing happened. In fact there is no way to repeat the second half in a meaningful way after that climax.
For me its the same for all the Scarlatti sonatas with repeating sections, where invariably there is a darker second section, which for me is the ultimatum of the piece and non repeatable
tarquin161234 8 months ago
@tarquin161234 I agree, the development repeat has actually fallen out of favor with many performers again - thankfully.
Nachtmarchen 8 months ago
@tarquin161234 Clearly, Mozart didn't know what he was doing.
fontinau 7 months ago
@fontinau I think it might just be what you're used to. As I said I am used to the second section being played once, and maybe that's why it feels right that way.
Thank you for shedding light on this matter with your profound and perceptive comment.
tarquin161234 7 months ago
@tarquin161234 You're welcome.
fontinau 7 months ago
@tarquin161234 Maybe you're a dedicated follower of fashion.
John27346 6 months ago
@tarquin161234 You might be right, but it's still a very modern point of view. If you compare several pieces from this time (the most impressive example would be the W. A. Mozart - Fantasie in C- Moll KV. 47) ,you'll find always bright part that's contrasting these dark parts. It's all about perfect balance, in harmony as in structure.
gitarrenmart 1 week ago
oh marybeth i love you
1hanamoon 10 months ago
my favorite!
cmyu100 10 months ago
@cmyu100 me too :)
pianoaddict06 10 months ago
brividi, brividi, brividi.
fra molti anni anche io la suonerò.
TheWasp2392 11 months ago
SUPERBE BRAVO
emmadoucette 1 year ago
I just learnt playing it and I thought I had achieved something..big! but after hearing this, at that speed, I feel like a complete zero, hehe :P
PsychoLemonpie 1 year ago
@PsychoLemonpie I feel the same.
HimeArissa 10 months ago
Wow im learnig this interpratation right now and its very difficult
XVJaVIVX 1 year ago
He adds an extra note at the beginning (for no good reason).
But his interpretation is of greater depth than the others floating around on YT.
flippert0 1 year ago
@flippert0 On my version there's the ornamented note at the start :P
ianuus 1 year ago
@ianuus Either I'm really mistaken regarding the score sheet or there are different editions of the sheet music out there.
flippert0 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flippert0 He doesn't add notes. He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
ComposerMK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
ComposerMK 1 year ago
He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
ComposerMK 1 year ago
@flippert0 on the urtext version its an ornament
pianoaddict06 10 months ago
best interpretation, but he add some notes in some parts, but his interpretation was the best till now i ever heard...
RenatoABabka 2 years ago
@RenatoABabka , He doesn't add notes. He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
ComposerMK 1 year ago
Till now the best one i've heard. But is it just me or does he hit an extra note at the beginning of the piece at . 0.18?
And the softness, so fluent. It's by far the best!
steef689 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@steef689 He doesn't add notes. He plays from the URTEXT editions, which is the original edition that Mozart wrote. All other editions are edited. So, they might have some notes missing. I have the URTEXT edition of this piece and it's exactly as he plays it.
ComposerMK 1 year ago
Best interpretation!
aaabbbccc5 2 years ago
WOW!!!!!
charlycrett 2 years ago