How can you have that kid holding your sign? That's disgraceful. He's WAY too young to have formed an opinion on such a complex topic. I hate people who use their children like this.
ahh shut up, there are plenty of you right-wing retards who brainwash your children to hate non-whites and to be douchebags. At least this kid is peaceful and making a positive statement about a serious issue. Most kids think 'war is cool', this one doesn't, and that is awesome in my book.
@SyndicalistTimes: I can tell it burns you or you wouldn't have mentioned it. And you wouldn't have made that page, trying to make yourself look like a badass. Punk rock and anarchist?? get serious, you fucking loser. What are you, 12 years old? Dork.
@SyndicalistTimes: I can tell it burns you or you wouldn't have mentioned it. And you wouldn't have made that page, trying to make yourself look like a badass. Punk rock and anarchist?? get serious, you fucking loser. What are you, 12 years old? Dork.
(to dismungus) the societal pressures would dictate your behaviour, would you continue to attemt to mingle or socialize with people who hated you outright?
how would your life continue if the only person in your community who knew how to properly perserve your food would refuse to perserve it? that is how anarchist society dictates behavior patterns
With their man. I know of too many men and women who are bankrupting their lives with this workaholic mentality. Married to their careers. The more women that stay at home having babies, the more secure the familiy is as a whole. Those damn banksters got everyone fooled.
You guys obviously have little understanding about what anarchism actually entails. Anyone would be able to sell any product or service for any price. There would be zero regulations and zero oversight. You need a state to enforce your silly rules where everyone shares and has a voice. In a anarchist society you would have to produce a good or service that you would exchange for other goods and services, but god forbid you acknowledge that trade is a form of capitalism.
No you don't, you just need to occupy the property you own. Yeah if you want to own huge tracks of land and multiple homes, then you would want a state to protect what you could not, but if you live in a house and own a car it would be just as it is now. But obviously I don't think people should be able to own too much. I don't agree with people and corporations owning everything around us. You can own what you need and use, but anything beyond that would be up for grabs.
So we agree on what property is then, because anarchy dictates no other entities except individuals. In the commun/social-ist fake anarchy all people would have a say in how I could use my property to generate wealth or goods.
I believe that anarchy implicitly means I can produce any good or service and exchange it in any manner I see fit. Fair or unfair, currency or goods, unlicensed, unregulated, untaxed, and without need of anyone's consent.
So if I live outside of an anarchist community, and my cattle are the only ones to survive a disease that strikes the local population, then: do you believe the community has a right to my cattle? You can replace the word cattle with: clean water, electricity, crops, and shelter.
Unless I give them "cattle" for free, they will suffer and someone might even die.
Basically do you consider refusal to take care of others the same as denying "someone of producing or accessing their needs"?
How much do I have? Is it just enough for myself and my family? Do even I have extra? Who needs it?
Did they farm the corn that feeds the beef? Do they transport it for me? What have they produced for us? If the answer is nothing except more mouths to feed, then yes I let them starve because they are a hindrance to the community.
Only those who who I rely on, can rely on me. Even the people that are relied upon, by people I rely on, would get help from me, but not just anyone and everyone.
Who enforces that? The people? Who gave them the right to annex property from other individuals? If I decide to share with some one, it would be because it was in my best interest. Which means yes I would help my community.
But assume I said "NO" I would not share with anyone despite my surplus. How would the community enforce socialist aspects of the "law"? There is no agency or set of laws to dictate behavior in anarchism.
The same way all fascists deal with political dissidents?
Shoot me, take all my shit and do it in the name of the greater good...
The funny part is... If you just worked hard enough to own some land of your own you might identify with what I'm trying to explain and not even need what I have, or instead have something to trade. I know thats not what you want though... Land, responsibility, a life of labor. Racketeering makes more sense I guess.
Please don't do anything rash to hurt the system, like running on the banks or deliberate property devaluations. That would give folks like you too much power against the system.
I <3 BlackBlock. It's too bad they tend to favor socialism/communism or they would fit right in with the constitutionalists militias and the like. That's a duo of dissenters you wouldn't want to fuck with.
I can only go by the interviews I've seen. If blackbloc and antifas are related or similar groups... I know I've seen an interview or two where a lot of them identify themselves as anarchists, but when probed with questions about the governments ideal role in society they tend to fall in to the socialism spectrum, and some of them identify themselves as communist.
alot of anarchists are anarcho syndicalists, or in other words anarcho-communist. these anarchists believe in stuff like organised trade union type society similiar to socialism, this may be the point of your confusion
So why do they march against corporations and free trade then? After all protesting specific companies, the WTO, and other non government organizations leads me to believe that they are anti capitalism... In a world of no governments there are no rules to stop unchecked free markets. Perhaps you can help me see the division more clearly.
LULZ... Democratically run business, where all people have a say in things -- no government control, no exploitation, AKA equal, unprotected, unenforced, free share in all companies?
ROFL! Hey can I borrow your car dood? Don't worry I'll bring it back real soon. Worse case scenario you can call the... Oh wait that's right no cops, but even if there were police you couldn't own property. So does your father own a business of some sort I need some money please.
Dingusmungus, it has worked in the past in Spain.. No cars were stolen, no chaos broke out, etc.
You're obviously not educated in the field in which you pretend to know about. Go read about anarchist philosophy, or just read. You might learn something.
I would say the same to aussie and you. Anarchism is directly supportive of bartering, free market economics and capitalism. It's rule structure is more decentralized to a near tribal or communal level, but it's still capitalism. Communities provide for their citizens via barter of goods. In true anarchism their is no requirement to share, nor be "fair" in your trades. Let me know if I'm wrong.
I also respect Spain's attempt to maintain decentralized village-level organization, but they where only prolonging the power vacuum it created. I for example support deregulation of markets and services because I believe in elements of anarcho-capitalism. You should really read up on the events of 1936-1939. It was the Communists and "liberal" Republicans that shattered the anarchist revolution in Spain. Just as you guys are doing in ideological terms now. Anarchism is nothing like communism.
Veterans Independents Real Conservatives End Neocon GREED Ron Ralph St Paul United "America where are you now? Don't you care about your sons and daughters? Don't you know we need you now We can't fight alone against the monster" gravel kucinich paul nader mckinney ventura too perot charts RATM
Anarchists generally want no form of state or government. When there is no government, there will be unchecked violence. You can deny this until you are blue in the face, but it has been proven time and time again.
You honestly believe that without government people will just get along right?
"You honestly believe that without government people will just get along right?"
Um, not really. If the state and government were to disappear right away, there probably will be unchecked violence. However, most anarchists don't want this. In Spain, where there was a highly successful anarchist experiment; it was spontaneous or out of the blue, but the result of a lot of hard work and solidarity. And where does anarchism keep failing, exactly? Most places on earth have governments or -
Anarchists with a total IQ of about 40....Useless bunch of people, with no direction, or clue as to what they even want...they just show up to be assholes for a pointless cause!
Who's streets? Our streets! The only thing is most of them don't pay any taxes and see nothing wrong with theft, as long as it's from an evil corporation. Grow up and get a job, if America sucks so bad then fucking leave!
I didnt hear any chants. I think its funny how the anarchists hate the government that gives them the right to protest. In many countries around the world they would just be shot.
I can't carry a pocket knife in my purse any more.
I can't buy fuel for private automobile any more. The last truck I had, the Bulgarian gypsy, siphoned the gas out it..hence I won't even try to protect a vehicle any more, people will steal the fuel. Every time I have taken a long trip..My luggage gets rifled and medicine gets stolen out of my bags.I don't cross the border into Canada anymore, as getting searched ruins my day
Anarchist, ARA, Blackbloc et al are the enemies of America and freedom.
Wake up, America!
FORMETOKNOWONLY 1 year ago
@FORMETOKNOWONLY
you are your own enemy, fool.
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
How can you have that kid holding your sign? That's disgraceful. He's WAY too young to have formed an opinion on such a complex topic. I hate people who use their children like this.
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
@AceSkepTik
ahh shut up, there are plenty of you right-wing retards who brainwash your children to hate non-whites and to be douchebags. At least this kid is peaceful and making a positive statement about a serious issue. Most kids think 'war is cool', this one doesn't, and that is awesome in my book.
Quit your whining!
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
@SyndicalistTimes "Punk Rock and Anti-Fascism"? HAHAHA! You're the coolest, Fonzie! What a dork.
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
@AceSkepTik
you're real smooth with your old fashioned portrait of some historical person.
Why not actually make a decent argument against me instead of being a coward?
Fuck off and get cancer you stupid cunt
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
@SyndicalistTimes: Right...make a decent argument against "right-wing retard". Crawl back into mommy's basement, you fucking DORK.
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
@AceSkepTik
ahahahahahha I simply stated basic facts.
OH NOES you called me a dork twice, I'm SOOOO offended HAHAHAHAHAHA
idiots like you are a dying breed :)
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
@SyndicalistTimes: I can tell it burns you or you wouldn't have mentioned it. And you wouldn't have made that page, trying to make yourself look like a badass. Punk rock and anarchist?? get serious, you fucking loser. What are you, 12 years old? Dork.
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
@AceSkepTik
man you really are stupid, aren't you?
it says PUNK ROCK, because I upload punk rock albums on youtube.
Anarchists outnumber and outsmart all of you right-wing freaks.
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
@SyndicalistTimes: Like I said...12 year old dork.
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
@AceSkepTik
200 year old throwback :D
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
@AceSkepTik
you are an obvious fascist shill.
If you were a real libertarian then you'd realise anarchists have common ground with libertarians. You are simply an obvious imbecile.
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SyndicalistTimes: I can tell it burns you or you wouldn't have mentioned it. And you wouldn't have made that page, trying to make yourself look like a badass. Punk rock and anarchist?? get serious, you fucking loser. What are you, 12 years old? Dork.
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SyndicalistTimes "Punk Rock and Anti-Fascism"? HAHAHA! What a dork. You're the coolest, Fonzie!
AceSkepTik 1 year ago
(to dismungus) the societal pressures would dictate your behaviour, would you continue to attemt to mingle or socialize with people who hated you outright?
how would your life continue if the only person in your community who knew how to properly perserve your food would refuse to perserve it? that is how anarchist society dictates behavior patterns
AnAnimal224 2 years ago
Former Marine who believes women should be at home making babies and keeping my apple pie warm.
7514328 2 years ago
Making babies with who?
BankRampage 2 years ago 4
With their man. I know of too many men and women who are bankrupting their lives with this workaholic mentality. Married to their careers. The more women that stay at home having babies, the more secure the familiy is as a whole. Those damn banksters got everyone fooled.
7514328 2 years ago
no what about the rights as females?
freebird199 2 years ago 3
WHAT!FUCK THAT SHIT!
bl00dproductions 2 years ago
@7514328
workers are the people with the real power, and women have just as much right to be workers as men. Please rethink your silly argument.
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
You guys obviously have little understanding about what anarchism actually entails. Anyone would be able to sell any product or service for any price. There would be zero regulations and zero oversight. You need a state to enforce your silly rules where everyone shares and has a voice. In a anarchist society you would have to produce a good or service that you would exchange for other goods and services, but god forbid you acknowledge that trade is a form of capitalism.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
You're going to need a state to protect property.
jackriter 3 years ago
No you don't, you just need to occupy the property you own. Yeah if you want to own huge tracks of land and multiple homes, then you would want a state to protect what you could not, but if you live in a house and own a car it would be just as it is now. But obviously I don't think people should be able to own too much. I don't agree with people and corporations owning everything around us. You can own what you need and use, but anything beyond that would be up for grabs.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
I mean private property, not personal, so yes you're right.
jackriter 3 years ago
So we agree on what property is then, because anarchy dictates no other entities except individuals. In the commun/social-ist fake anarchy all people would have a say in how I could use my property to generate wealth or goods.
I believe that anarchy implicitly means I can produce any good or service and exchange it in any manner I see fit. Fair or unfair, currency or goods, unlicensed, unregulated, untaxed, and without need of anyone's consent.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
Sure, as long as you don't deny someone of producing or accessing their needs.
jackriter 3 years ago 2
So if I live outside of an anarchist community, and my cattle are the only ones to survive a disease that strikes the local population, then: do you believe the community has a right to my cattle? You can replace the word cattle with: clean water, electricity, crops, and shelter.
Unless I give them "cattle" for free, they will suffer and someone might even die.
Basically do you consider refusal to take care of others the same as denying "someone of producing or accessing their needs"?
dingusmungus 3 years ago
Would you really withhold the cattle while your neighbors are starving?
jackriter 3 years ago
How much do I have? Is it just enough for myself and my family? Do even I have extra? Who needs it?
Did they farm the corn that feeds the beef? Do they transport it for me? What have they produced for us? If the answer is nothing except more mouths to feed, then yes I let them starve because they are a hindrance to the community.
Only those who who I rely on, can rely on me. Even the people that are relied upon, by people I rely on, would get help from me, but not just anyone and everyone.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
But in an anarchist society everyone works to upheld the community meaning they would have helped you transport the food osv.
zlass55 3 years ago
Who enforces that? The people? Who gave them the right to annex property from other individuals? If I decide to share with some one, it would be because it was in my best interest. Which means yes I would help my community.
But assume I said "NO" I would not share with anyone despite my surplus. How would the community enforce socialist aspects of the "law"? There is no agency or set of laws to dictate behavior in anarchism.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
@dingusmungus
"There is no agency or set of laws to dictate behavior in anarchism."
There IS organisation, take a guess at how we would treat some hoarding greedy fucktard.
SyndicalistTimes 1 year ago
@SyndicalistTimes
Hmmmm... Let me guess:
The same way all fascists deal with political dissidents?
Shoot me, take all my shit and do it in the name of the greater good...
The funny part is... If you just worked hard enough to own some land of your own you might identify with what I'm trying to explain and not even need what I have, or instead have something to trade. I know thats not what you want though... Land, responsibility, a life of labor. Racketeering makes more sense I guess.
dingusmungus 11 months ago
@dingusmungus
yep, you're going to the gulag.
SyndicalistTimes 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SyndicalistTimes
>There IS organisation, take a guess at how we would treat some hoarding greedy fucktard.
Your words not mine... You are the worse version of the thing you supposedly oppose.
I'm sure you would have loved living under any of histories socialist/fascist regimes.
dingusmungus 11 months ago
Please don't do anything rash to hurt the system, like running on the banks or deliberate property devaluations. That would give folks like you too much power against the system.
BankRampage 2 years ago
That little kid rules. Soon enough he will be tossing molotovs through the precinct
poopballz50 3 years ago
I <3 BlackBlock. It's too bad they tend to favor socialism/communism or they would fit right in with the constitutionalists militias and the like. That's a duo of dissenters you wouldn't want to fuck with.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
i thought black blocs were done mainly by autonomists and anarchists?
god0fmusic 3 years ago
I can only go by the interviews I've seen. If blackbloc and antifas are related or similar groups... I know I've seen an interview or two where a lot of them identify themselves as anarchists, but when probed with questions about the governments ideal role in society they tend to fall in to the socialism spectrum, and some of them identify themselves as communist.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
well, it might be. anarchists tend to prefer a socialist government over a capitalist one, so that could explain part of it.
im basing my argument on what i have read on wikipedia. and the fact that black represents anarchism.
god0fmusic 3 years ago
alot of anarchists are anarcho syndicalists, or in other words anarcho-communist. these anarchists believe in stuff like organised trade union type society similiar to socialism, this may be the point of your confusion
aussieanarchist 3 years ago 8
@aussieanarchist
Translation: alot of anarchists don't know what anarchy means.
dingusmungus 11 months ago
lol Constitutionalist militias..
And no, most black bloc participators are of the anarchist, zapatista or autonomist philosophy.
If it was state socialist, I would suppose they would call it a red bloc.. lol
KenCat1337 3 years ago
So why do they march against corporations and free trade then? After all protesting specific companies, the WTO, and other non government organizations leads me to believe that they are anti capitalism... In a world of no governments there are no rules to stop unchecked free markets. Perhaps you can help me see the division more clearly.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
Anarchists are opposed to both "free trade" and "fair trade" for neither are free or fair.
"Fair" trade is control of the market, making it oppressive to trade industries while lowering exploitation.
"Free" trade is no control over markets, so markets are free, though exploitation is high.
Anarchists are for democratically run business, where all have a say in things -- no government control, no exploitation.
KenCat1337 3 years ago
LULZ... Democratically run business, where all people have a say in things -- no government control, no exploitation, AKA equal, unprotected, unenforced, free share in all companies?
ROFL! Hey can I borrow your car dood? Don't worry I'll bring it back real soon. Worse case scenario you can call the... Oh wait that's right no cops, but even if there were police you couldn't own property. So does your father own a business of some sort I need some money please.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
Dingusmungus, it has worked in the past in Spain.. No cars were stolen, no chaos broke out, etc.
You're obviously not educated in the field in which you pretend to know about. Go read about anarchist philosophy, or just read. You might learn something.
KenCat1337 3 years ago
I would say the same to aussie and you. Anarchism is directly supportive of bartering, free market economics and capitalism. It's rule structure is more decentralized to a near tribal or communal level, but it's still capitalism. Communities provide for their citizens via barter of goods. In true anarchism their is no requirement to share, nor be "fair" in your trades. Let me know if I'm wrong.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
I also respect Spain's attempt to maintain decentralized village-level organization, but they where only prolonging the power vacuum it created. I for example support deregulation of markets and services because I believe in elements of anarcho-capitalism. You should really read up on the events of 1936-1939. It was the Communists and "liberal" Republicans that shattered the anarchist revolution in Spain. Just as you guys are doing in ideological terms now. Anarchism is nothing like communism.
dingusmungus 3 years ago
"Anarchism is directly supportive of bartering, free market economics and capitalism"
Not really. Capitalism needs a state to exist.
MarxBakuninMe 3 years ago
Anarchism has never, ever meant capitalism. The few individualist or market-oriented anarchists even oppose it.
KenCat1337 3 years ago
anarchism is anti-capitalist, we are not denying that. why argue that it is when everyone knows it is
aussieanarchist 3 years ago
ryanshaunkelly 3 years ago
Anarchists generally want no form of state or government. When there is no government, there will be unchecked violence. You can deny this until you are blue in the face, but it has been proven time and time again.
You honestly believe that without government people will just get along right?
matthrms 3 years ago
"You honestly believe that without government people will just get along right?"
Um, not really. If the state and government were to disappear right away, there probably will be unchecked violence. However, most anarchists don't want this. In Spain, where there was a highly successful anarchist experiment; it was spontaneous or out of the blue, but the result of a lot of hard work and solidarity. And where does anarchism keep failing, exactly? Most places on earth have governments or -
KafkaCrow 3 years ago
- at least forces wanting to be the government. Anarchy (i.e., or idea of it) will not be achieved overnight.
KafkaCrow 3 years ago 3
Anarchists with a total IQ of about 40....Useless bunch of people, with no direction, or clue as to what they even want...they just show up to be assholes for a pointless cause!
pianoplayinfool 3 years ago
Couldnt agree more
jbfirstdown22 3 years ago
Where's your analysis here, exactly? All anarchists have "no direction"? Doesn't wanting a better world mean you have direction?
KafkaCrow 3 years ago 2
What kind of sick twisted fuck brings a small 3-4 year old child to a political protest, shoves a sign in his hand and videotapes it?
That right there tells you all you need to know about these deranged losers.
davep224 3 years ago
What kind of sick fuck brings a small 3-4 year old child to a political protest, shoves a sign in his hand and videotapes it?
That right there tells you all you need to know about these deranged losers.
davep224 3 years ago
Who's streets? Our streets! The only thing is most of them don't pay any taxes and see nothing wrong with theft, as long as it's from an evil corporation. Grow up and get a job, if America sucks so bad then fucking leave!
111888aaa 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And if pigs could fly...
agentpolsky 3 years ago
These people would be the first to go if they actually got what they wanted.
funny isn't it?
matthrms 3 years ago
"...Thomas the tank engine and U.S. out of Iraq."
Ha! Very nice!
adrianneleighg 3 years ago
WE ARE THE WORLD AND WE ARE WATCHING!
Thank you UpTakeVideo.
Dalypics 3 years ago 2
I didnt hear any chants. I think its funny how the anarchists hate the government that gives them the right to protest. In many countries around the world they would just be shot.
mazter1224 3 years ago
the people marching are working to re secure our freedoms.
Put your head phones on maybe you can hear better
DorothyDandrich 3 years ago
I'm tempted to ask what you can't do anymore that you used to be able to 7 years ago...
jnoble12 3 years ago
Live without the fear of illegal search and seizure, for one thing.
DBtv 3 years ago
I can't carry a pocket knife in my purse any more.
I can't buy fuel for private automobile any more. The last truck I had, the Bulgarian gypsy, siphoned the gas out it..hence I won't even try to protect a vehicle any more, people will steal the fuel. Every time I have taken a long trip..My luggage gets rifled and medicine gets stolen out of my bags.I don't cross the border into Canada anymore, as getting searched ruins my day
siphoned the gas out it
DorothyDandrich 3 years ago