I would like to re-record this voice over to include the words, "the rover can use it's tactical defensive laser in the face of a detected underground threat, mitigating the possibility of hostile takeover of its nuclear systems by subterranean-dwelling enemies."
Here's to humanity for continuing to pursue the unknown! Let's spend more on these endeavors and stop blowing each other up. It's time to grow up and look beyond ourselves.
@AnalogX64 Phoenix performed a similar landing BUT it the whole stage landed. This is a first with have a decent stage and rover attached to it. There are going to be some very nervous controllers on landing day. Get the Valium ready!
@Soporipherum I find your comment offensive and unamerican. Because it sounds like you are trying to say that 5 days of killing brown people is worth less than massive scientific discoveries that will last millennium and even help the human race become space faring peoples. I for one believe that killing people with cool weapons is worth far more than truth knowledge and the progression of the human race to highs unimaginable until now.
@seeriktus Curiosity is too large and too heavy for that method to suffice. Also, it's actually much more reliable and accurate. Curiosity's landing system is actually surprisingly similar to the last two rovers, considering it will also use rockets to slow itself down for the final stage, and will also descend down a cable for landing. The only real difference is this method is much more precise, and doesn't require dropping the rover from 15 meters for several painful 40g bounces.
Maybe in a few thousand years or less these rovers will be sitting in a science museum on Mars itself that people can go visit and marvel at all the primitive technology from the early 21st century explorers.
No matter what time or era you live in, there will come a time when your epoch will be ancient history. Looking at it that way, we live in the distant past according to some future generation. Weird.
Wow that cool. I can't imagine the planning and math it takes to pull something like this off.
I get slightly depressed when I see stuff like this. We've managed to build this little thing, send it to a planet 137 million miles away AND land, but for some reason, can't figure out how to not kill each other off here. wish we'd get it together on the blue planet before poking around on the red one.
JPL: I know it's become a convention, but could you please, please not add sound effects in space on these videos? And pay a little more attention to the sound in general? There's a great educational opportunity here. For example, given that the atmosphere of Mars is less dense than Earth's and has a different composition, what would things really sound like there? The rest of the production values are so good. Please don't skimp on the audio...
@JonBastian There's no sound in space....but there's an attention span in humans. Were there no SFX, we would have much criticism and many comments asking why. As for sounds in a Martian atmosphere - until we have a working microphone on the surface - who knows. Various simulations suggest it would be similar to Earth - but quieter. Again - if we did that, the comments and criticism would be 'I can't hear it'. Why not try an audio-mashup of your own - there's an HD download at JPL.
I always think an opportunity is missed to inform people of the different speeds of sound and a bit of appreciation for the Mach scale of speed measurements. Like "At about Mach 2, which at the equivalent speed of 1000MPH and altitude of X on Earth would be Mach 1.5."
@ReasonNLogic Speed of sound is a function of the temperature and composition of the atmosphere. For instance, the speed of sound at 0° C of CO2 = 259 m/sec, O2 = 316 m/sec, and hydrogen = 1,290 m/sec. I understand (but am not certain, I'd encourage you to research it yourself) that the speed of sound on Mars is less than on Earth primarily due to a higher fraction of CO2 in the atmosphere.
This has long been a NASA problem. We developed a great delivery system for Spirit and Opportunity but choose to spend money developing something new and complicated for Curiosity. If they successfully get this thing on the ground it will be a wonder.
Too bad NASA engineers don't get bonuses for recycling and coming in under budget. There are so many thing to explore and so few resources available for exploration.
@csisatyr The Airbag landing system for Spirit and Opportunity was itself, a recycled landing system from the 1997 Mars Pathfinder mission. However, Curiosity is so much heavier ( about 5 x heavier than Spirit and Opportunity ) that the Airbag landing system simply wouldn't work.
@themardybum08 Just getting the thing to mars is a wonder in itself, if they can do that every time, then they can land it on a planet with a hell of a lot less atomo than earth.
If NASA was allowed to use nuclear power the rover would of been on Mars by now
tailandfox 2 weeks ago
Wall-E
DonsMooreSales 1 month ago
I would like to re-record this voice over to include the words, "the rover can use it's tactical defensive laser in the face of a detected underground threat, mitigating the possibility of hostile takeover of its nuclear systems by subterranean-dwelling enemies."
LeeAVP 2 months ago
Here's to humanity for continuing to pursue the unknown! Let's spend more on these endeavors and stop blowing each other up. It's time to grow up and look beyond ourselves.
Dreamsteep 2 months ago
@Soporipherum
And what makes it even worse is that if this mission fails, NASA will shut down because of the economical problem...
Yeah....
Shuting down NASA for doing something actualy useful instead of stopping a war wich costs about 100 times more a month.
keshaz12 3 months ago
@Soporipherum Think of the things we could have accomplished... =/
laserfloyd 3 months ago
I can see any solar panel on the rover. How can he have enough power for more than a year ?
nirvana2544 3 months ago
@nirvana2544 It's nuclear-powered for the planned 2-year duration of the main mission objectives.
33Skygazer 3 months ago
The process looks very complicated, I hope they can pull it off.
We cant stay on this planet forever and need to leave at some point, these types of missions is the start.
AnalogX64 3 months ago
@AnalogX64 Phoenix performed a similar landing BUT it the whole stage landed. This is a first with have a decent stage and rover attached to it. There are going to be some very nervous controllers on landing day. Get the Valium ready!
laserfloyd 3 months ago
@AnalogX64 Are you having a laugh? We will never get off this planet. This mission wont work because it's overcomplicated.
peaps 3 months ago
@Soporipherum make robots, not war.
bakasheru 3 months ago 2
@bakasheru Un patriotic american, there would no space projects without war. WAR= TECH
Abdikarimelmi 3 months ago
@Abdikarimelmi I'm so unpatriotic, that I'm not even American.
bakasheru 3 months ago
WALL-E
DKeskiN 3 months ago in playlist Flere videoer fra JPLnews 2
Mars: It's one damn surprise after another.
DrIasimov 3 months ago
mach 2 or 1000 mph? mach2 is like 2472mph!
TeachingU 5 months ago
@TeachingU The speed of sound is different on Mars due to density, atmosphere composition, and temperature.
alchen96 3 months ago
@alchen96 Makes sense then. Thanks! Maybe we should stop using "terms" and start using numbers instead.
TeachingU 2 months ago
@Soporipherum I find your comment offensive and unamerican. Because it sounds like you are trying to say that 5 days of killing brown people is worth less than massive scientific discoveries that will last millennium and even help the human race become space faring peoples. I for one believe that killing people with cool weapons is worth far more than truth knowledge and the progression of the human race to highs unimaginable until now.
thesparitan 5 months ago in playlist More videos from JPLnews
man on mars , maybe in 2035 ?
patrickclatot 6 months ago
oui cela est extraordinaire , quand l' homme sur mars , peut etre vers 2035 .
patrickclatot 6 months ago
Way too complex.. gonna fail!
Kg277 6 months ago
Why does even NASA put sound in Space!?
nexuseragon 6 months ago 6
@nexuseragon the sound in the video is inaccurate, however, you would still hear the sound of engines and vibrations if you were on the ship.
thisnameisuniq 4 months ago
@nexuseragon they hax?
KathrynHazuka 1 month ago
@nexuseragon to interest the public...
pjazzopardi 1 month ago
Isnt that rocket+lowering to the ground bit at the end an extravagance? Why not just plonk it down with parachute+balloon like previous missions?
seeriktus 6 months ago
@seeriktus Curiosity is too large and too heavy for that method to suffice. Also, it's actually much more reliable and accurate. Curiosity's landing system is actually surprisingly similar to the last two rovers, considering it will also use rockets to slow itself down for the final stage, and will also descend down a cable for landing. The only real difference is this method is much more precise, and doesn't require dropping the rover from 15 meters for several painful 40g bounces.
UndeadPizzaGuy 5 months ago 2
This is so amazing, i hope everything will work fine :)
Affenzahn376 6 months ago
Watch out for the transformers when there. They tend to pick up the rovers.
SwitchBladeII 7 months ago
Maybe in a few thousand years or less these rovers will be sitting in a science museum on Mars itself that people can go visit and marvel at all the primitive technology from the early 21st century explorers.
No matter what time or era you live in, there will come a time when your epoch will be ancient history. Looking at it that way, we live in the distant past according to some future generation. Weird.
2eelShmeal 7 months ago 2
i wish we had some hi def video watch this thing land
grgfraiser 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
f.u.c.k science
Daniel17535 7 months ago
@Daniel17535 F.U.C.K YOU
koalabear2 7 months ago
Aloha NASA JPL trailblazer in space technologies YouYube site is awesome bravo thank you sincerely. kauaicr07
kauaicr07 7 months ago
Cool, but very hard landing, must be more simple =)
Xpycts 8 months ago
@Soporipherum fuck you.
phantom1000A 8 months ago
Wow that cool. I can't imagine the planning and math it takes to pull something like this off.
I get slightly depressed when I see stuff like this. We've managed to build this little thing, send it to a planet 137 million miles away AND land, but for some reason, can't figure out how to not kill each other off here. wish we'd get it together on the blue planet before poking around on the red one.
MileenasFloss 8 months ago
can it check for microfossils?
arna11420 8 months ago
@arna11420 Sadly no. I watched the hour long mission briefing.
2eelShmeal 7 months ago
@Soporipherum Oh God I'm an idiot, I see what you're saying now. Sorry! I'm just tired of all the ignorance on these videos and I went after you.
Skaarjguy 8 months ago
Comment removed
Skaarjguy 8 months ago
impressive piece of machinery it boggles the mind the amount of calculations and work needed to do this one thing
freequest 8 months ago
JPL: I know it's become a convention, but could you please, please not add sound effects in space on these videos? And pay a little more attention to the sound in general? There's a great educational opportunity here. For example, given that the atmosphere of Mars is less dense than Earth's and has a different composition, what would things really sound like there? The rest of the production values are so good. Please don't skimp on the audio...
JonBastian 8 months ago
@JonBastian There's no sound in space....but there's an attention span in humans. Were there no SFX, we would have much criticism and many comments asking why. As for sounds in a Martian atmosphere - until we have a working microphone on the surface - who knows. Various simulations suggest it would be similar to Earth - but quieter. Again - if we did that, the comments and criticism would be 'I can't hear it'. Why not try an audio-mashup of your own - there's an HD download at JPL.
unmannedspaceflight 8 months ago
Looks extremly complicated to land the rover safely. Hopefully everything works well finally.
HermannRattenhuber 8 months ago
I got my name put on to that chip thing along with 1.5 million others appx. they put a call out for last year.
I like to think I'll be chosen for recolonization by the laser robot aliens before the earth explodes.
snackbar123 8 months ago
I sure hope it works but the landing sure isn't fail-safe!
pagani8 8 months ago
That's the coolest method of rover deployment ever!
d4rksektor 8 months ago
El atterrizaje en Marte de "Curiosity", narrado. Véanlo, muy bueno.
danielsoto888 8 months ago
That is flipping awesome!!! Keep up the great work, NASA!
Violaman0910 8 months ago
Thumbs up for science!!
ReasonNLogic 8 months ago
a lot of points of failure during landing.. hope it works without a hitch.
hapt1K 8 months ago
Would we be able to use this device to discover if life ever existed on Earth?
illustriouschin 8 months ago
@illustriouschin life does exist on earth :P mars*
jeevaisnet 8 months ago
@jeevaisnet Was someone able to use this machine to shoot a laser at some rock powder to check this?
illustriouschin 8 months ago
Fascinating.
StephenHeart 8 months ago
I hope it will all work good!
Can't wait for the real landing :D
metapagn 8 months ago 38
im ao excited about this mission.
GOOD LUCK JPL and |NASA|!!!
tiapon 8 months ago
I always think an opportunity is missed to inform people of the different speeds of sound and a bit of appreciation for the Mach scale of speed measurements. Like "At about Mach 2, which at the equivalent speed of 1000MPH and altitude of X on Earth would be Mach 1.5."
Maybe I'm just being needlessly pedantic...
holyhell5050 8 months ago
@holyhell5050 Is it because of atmospheric density?
ReasonNLogic 8 months ago
@ReasonNLogic Speed of sound is a function of the temperature and composition of the atmosphere. For instance, the speed of sound at 0° C of CO2 = 259 m/sec, O2 = 316 m/sec, and hydrogen = 1,290 m/sec. I understand (but am not certain, I'd encourage you to research it yourself) that the speed of sound on Mars is less than on Earth primarily due to a higher fraction of CO2 in the atmosphere.
holyhell5050 8 months ago
awesome =)
CammarroSS 8 months ago
Seeing the descent stage I couldn't help but think of a line in the opening scene of Pandora's Star, which I read recently- also spoken on Mars.
"Hey dudes, how's it hanging?"
Bad pun, I know!
Rg2732 8 months ago
Awesome.
DaBamBamMan 8 months ago
2:45 IMMA FIRIN MAH LAZOR!!!
sonichockeyaug 8 months ago
This has long been a NASA problem. We developed a great delivery system for Spirit and Opportunity but choose to spend money developing something new and complicated for Curiosity. If they successfully get this thing on the ground it will be a wonder.
Too bad NASA engineers don't get bonuses for recycling and coming in under budget. There are so many thing to explore and so few resources available for exploration.
csisatyr 8 months ago
@csisatyr Curiosity was too large to use the same landing system as Spirit and Opportunity, so they had to develop the new landing system.
Censming 8 months ago
@csisatyr The Airbag landing system for Spirit and Opportunity was itself, a recycled landing system from the 1997 Mars Pathfinder mission. However, Curiosity is so much heavier ( about 5 x heavier than Spirit and Opportunity ) that the Airbag landing system simply wouldn't work.
unmannedspaceflight 8 months ago
Incredible, can not wait :D
IdoloR 8 months ago
Where is the chip that has my name on it?
bitiminicik 8 months ago
How lucky we are to live in this time. The first moment in human history, when we are infact, parachuting a dropcrane jetpackrover.
wakadododo 8 months ago
Can't wait! So much to go wrong though : (
themardybum08 8 months ago 2
@themardybum08 Just getting the thing to mars is a wonder in itself, if they can do that every time, then they can land it on a planet with a hell of a lot less atomo than earth.
DaBamBamMan 8 months ago