@e1853b you are very dumb..... a guy from muscle mustangs and fast fords pulled an 11.8 in the quarter with a stock gt500 no mods no tires. and it was only a 2010. If it was a 2011 it would,ve ran 11.7 or lower and the gt500 still costs less than both so why not put a pulley and a tune. i wouldnt ever consider getting a regular c6 corvette. I wouldve gotten the C6 Z06 or a ZR1 if i even wanted one.
@e1853b - Yeah, I watched the video, did you? How about reading comprehension? I said a GT500 with a pulley, tune and CAI will beat a stock Z06. Thats not bashing a stock Z06, it is almost complimenting it. I would love to see where to buy a new Vette for 35k? I suggest before you S#1+ talk you learn to properly address the facts and the comment you are addressing. Until then give your dad back the keys to the Vette.
@e1853b - Your insane dude. A GT500 will smoke a vette and a GT500 with a pulley, tune and CAI will beat a factory Z06 hands down. I own one and have driven both. Please tell me where to get a Z06 for 35k?
First of all, I have a 2007 GT500, which stock has almost 50hp less than this car and there is no way that pedal is on the floor in this video. I can roll at 50mph in second gear and when I mash the gas it blows the tires away until third gear (Almost 75mph). First gear is worthless without a drag radial. Car went 11.86 with a blower pulley, tune and CAI. Paid 34k for the car. Lets see if we can find an import that runs in the 11s for 34k and doesn't sport a rainbow sticker from the factory.
Haha, these cars are way too expensive for my income. I'll save my money and buy a 2000 Ford Mustang GT 2V 4.6L DOHC V8 that weighs 3,237 pounds without a driver. By the time I'd be done upgrading and modding it, believe me, it would besome Frankensteined piece of crap that has zero resale......
Haha, these cars are way too expensive for my income. I'll save my money and buy a 2000 Ford Mustang GT 2V 4.6L DOHC V8 that weighs 3,237 pounds without a driver. By the time I'd be done upgrading and modding it, believe me, it would give a Porshe or a Lamborghini a good race considering how much the other person paid for his/her vehicle. They would've wished they stayed in Europe! Ford needs to make a 2011 or 2012 Ford GT too. Now that would be sick.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
When the testers think that acceleration is all drivers are interested in, that is a real turn off. Burning rubber is so stupid, it kills the video. Only a childish mind likes that stuff.
no se en que condiciones hacen ese tipo de pruebas a nivel del mar?, por que la verdad no creo que sea con un microsat, son muy erroneos los numeros, el 0 a 100 el precioso gt500los realiza en 6 seg, una cifra mas que brutal, ya que es superior en aceleraciones a rivales indirectos, como un m3 m5,rs4,rs6,r8 etc, el doble de caros, y eso que patina las llantas al acelerar, seguro que con unas llantas slicks bajaba alos 5 seg, nadie le hace sombra, RICK AND SVT
los datos son de un microsat, un juez frio y duro, el gt500 realizo los 100 en 6.03 seg, ford afirma que lso hace en 4 seg, pero eso es en situaciones extremadamente ideales, como ya as de saber, pero en condiciones normales, como en una ciudad, el ford se queda en 6 seg, una cifra muy respetable y abrumadora, mas rapido que los autos que ya puse, no se como agan sus mediciones los de este video, pero dudo que los agan con al menos un dinamometro, checa que es un microsat brother, bye bye
who cares about the 0-60............ it's the quarter mile that counts......... it's faster in the quarter mile and it corners better than the previous mustang. Ford still uses the old mosaic technology, and yet still it out handles cars that are modern and much more expensive. I say Ford stepped up their game. I like the mustangs because they are well within budget, and they are cheap and easy to modify. You want a mustang that handles? $5000. and you're mustang will out handle at the track...
not even 5,000 bucks. just slap on that fr3 suspension kit from ford racing, some light weight ford racing wheels, good years eagle tires and a kenne belle super charger and ur good 2 go. that will come to around 2500 bucks
@ryu1036 man that is a steal but thats to be expected in places like ny or california where there are a tone of shops. Here in Indianapolis lies the contradiction, sure the racing capital of the world, but it seems grass roots racing is expensive due to the lack of competing shops. I think ill come to NY. lol.
Are u guys fucking stupid, How the fuck can u test a car going the wrong way in a 1/4 and get correct readings???????????? That's why i hate your type of shows cuz thier lame and fucking WRONG!!! You guys are a cali speedway on the fucking slow down part of the endof the 1/4 mine!!!!!!!!! With no rubber!!!! 12.50's?? are u fucking serious?
What are you talking about. This car is better looking and has more power. You are so full of shit saying that I tested the car with my "friends" and everyone hated it. You probably are a 8 year old kid who is not old enough to appreciate a good car when you see one.
its not even a race car. i take my 06 gt to ford racing division store and they have every possible type of mustang you could want. they had racing circuit stangs, drag stangs, they even had sleeper stangs. if u dont like the car keep it to ur self no one wants to here ur negativity on a truly amazing car.
Retards the car as nose heavy as it is with its shitty rubber, just pulled damn near 70miles per hour through a 700 ft slalom. Shit TV like Top Gear who hates this car had it lapping its road course fater then E46m3 CSL and new STi. CSL on pilot cups! You can hate it all you want but you cant change the facts!
They had an s917 Shelby not the 2010 Gt500 on Top Gear. It wasn't the GT500 that beat the CSL and Viper, it was an S197 Stage 3 Roush Mustang which is about 300lbs lighter then the GT500. BTW they didn't hate the Roush, Clarkson has a Ford GT and a Roush in his garage.
You are correct that it was the 2008 gt500. not this 2010 on top gear. but it was the gt500 that lapped faster then the csl. Right after it was run as usual the time was placed on the board. Right above the CSL and STi. The Roush while a nice car is not a GT500. All truly irelevant, fact is the car does quite well for what it is. Looks like the 2010 takes that up a notch. By the way no matter who tests this car no matter how much they say its heay etc, they always have a huge smile driving it.
Hammond drove a blue GT500, then Jeremy compared a Roush to the GT500, then they had a silver Roush against a Lotus with the Stig driving the Lotus. After they had a Blue GT500 driving by the Stig with a time of 1:30, slower then a WRX faster then a Golf R32. With only 415HP, the Roush destroyed the Gt500 with 1:28 beating CSL, Viper SRT10, 911S. Just do a youtube search "mustang gt500 top gear" click on the 9min version ;)
I'm a GM man and a big Camaro fan but I will respect any good car.
The 2010 GT500 is an awesome car and a great performance bargain. Still not a huge fan of the new rear tailights but they are starting to grow on me. The thing that makes a car like the GT500 great is how easy it is to mod them. Pully and bolt-ons can net over 100rwhp gain. Hell they will handle about 800rwhp on stock internals. Some have handled up to 1,000rwhp with a great tune.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I wouldve thought a car from such a powerful country wouldnt look and handle like such a piece of shit! Why do amerikans like those sissy colors? In my country, only a woman would drive a car that color. And, only a retarded woman would buy an amerikan junk!
Well, there is the Corvette, and the Dodge Viper, the Ford GT and....the ULTIMATE AERO!!!!! Which blows the Bugatti Veron off the track in every performance aspect.
@Georgenfla - Really because your country was most likely saved by fighting Americans in the past. Douchebag. Keep talking trash while you know there isn't an American standing around the corner waiting to feed you your teeth.
Hmm... Check out the video called "Fast New Shelby Mustang GT500 Full Test" by InsideLineVideo. They got 0-60 in 4.3 seconds and 4.0 w/roll out. I'm guessing they had a better driver at that time?
I personally would take that 46k and get a lightly used (10 to15k miles) 08 model and spend around 18 to 20K buying it and then spend the rest on upgrades. I would have a faster, better handling, unique mustang. Just my opinion :)
That would work out, but you would have to fork out the rest of the 20k out of your pocket to upgrade it. Or you could just make a monthly payment for one of these =]. That's true though, you could make an 08 Mustang faster, but you would have to have the cash.
If you look at the Mustang vs Camaro vs Challenger video by motortrend, the Mustang GT, pulls off almost the same numbers, other then the 0-60 which isn't far off.
Hey guy Wouldn't it be cool if Chevey came out with an SYC version to the Camero I's say 700 to 800hp Supercharged with the old retro colors!!! A Yank vs the Shelby KR Supersnake would be an amazing fist fight!
Was something wrong with the first test they did? Search Fast New Shelby Mustang GT500 Full Test in the youtube search bar. Insideline already did a test and got better times, 0-60 of 4.3, 4.0 with rollout. Why did they do this again? And how did the car get slower? Can I get a reply insideline? please I believe the first video as a 4.6 0-60 is very low for this car.
perhaps they were using a different year???i really don't know,but like u i would also like 2 know what happened...irregardless,this car kicked the Camaro's ass woooo!!!
Well in the other vid they say new shelby gt500 and it was the style of the 2010 so it was the same car. And yea, that and the challenger but, what doesn't.
Yeah, Ford engineers have been as stubborn about the live axle as Porsche engineers have been about the rear engine layout. The joke is, after absurd amounts of time studying it, they finally figured out a solution.
looks like they made it totally right this time. the skid pad reading is an insane .93g. win for mechanical grip. and it just looks mean and powerful like it's going to eat the road and the ass of your car. great work ford, really
everyone shut up its a great car you dont hav to be an expert in cars to know it...get over it ha
DUFFmanBEATS10 7 months ago
@e1853b you are very dumb..... a guy from muscle mustangs and fast fords pulled an 11.8 in the quarter with a stock gt500 no mods no tires. and it was only a 2010. If it was a 2011 it would,ve ran 11.7 or lower and the gt500 still costs less than both so why not put a pulley and a tune. i wouldnt ever consider getting a regular c6 corvette. I wouldve gotten the C6 Z06 or a ZR1 if i even wanted one.
TheLil281ThatCould 11 months ago
@e1853b - Yeah, I watched the video, did you? How about reading comprehension? I said a GT500 with a pulley, tune and CAI will beat a stock Z06. Thats not bashing a stock Z06, it is almost complimenting it. I would love to see where to buy a new Vette for 35k? I suggest before you S#1+ talk you learn to properly address the facts and the comment you are addressing. Until then give your dad back the keys to the Vette.
panthersblow 1 year ago
@e1853b - Your insane dude. A GT500 will smoke a vette and a GT500 with a pulley, tune and CAI will beat a factory Z06 hands down. I own one and have driven both. Please tell me where to get a Z06 for 35k?
panthersblow 1 year ago
First of all, I have a 2007 GT500, which stock has almost 50hp less than this car and there is no way that pedal is on the floor in this video. I can roll at 50mph in second gear and when I mash the gas it blows the tires away until third gear (Almost 75mph). First gear is worthless without a drag radial. Car went 11.86 with a blower pulley, tune and CAI. Paid 34k for the car. Lets see if we can find an import that runs in the 11s for 34k and doesn't sport a rainbow sticker from the factory.
panthersblow 1 year ago
Fixed it for ya.......
Haha, these cars are way too expensive for my income. I'll save my money and buy a 2000 Ford Mustang GT 2V 4.6L DOHC V8 that weighs 3,237 pounds without a driver. By the time I'd be done upgrading and modding it, believe me, it would besome Frankensteined piece of crap that has zero resale......
KewlV8 2 years ago
Haha, these cars are way too expensive for my income. I'll save my money and buy a 2000 Ford Mustang GT 2V 4.6L DOHC V8 that weighs 3,237 pounds without a driver. By the time I'd be done upgrading and modding it, believe me, it would give a Porshe or a Lamborghini a good race considering how much the other person paid for his/her vehicle. They would've wished they stayed in Europe! Ford needs to make a 2011 or 2012 Ford GT too. Now that would be sick.
justin88990 2 years ago
like, thats how it should be done. these rich boys can't touch american muscle!
Jacob0004 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When the testers think that acceleration is all drivers are interested in, that is a real turn off. Burning rubber is so stupid, it kills the video. Only a childish mind likes that stuff.
Bmants 2 years ago
They are testing the cars to see if it can compete with the competition. Testers do it to every car. "EVERY CAR"
It's what they get paid to do.
They test it
They score it
They rate it
They critize it
and
most of all
They drive the shit outta of it.
Testers it's what they get paid to do.
triplet85 2 years ago
no se en que condiciones hacen ese tipo de pruebas a nivel del mar?, por que la verdad no creo que sea con un microsat, son muy erroneos los numeros, el 0 a 100 el precioso gt500los realiza en 6 seg, una cifra mas que brutal, ya que es superior en aceleraciones a rivales indirectos, como un m3 m5,rs4,rs6,r8 etc, el doble de caros, y eso que patina las llantas al acelerar, seguro que con unas llantas slicks bajaba alos 5 seg, nadie le hace sombra, RICK AND SVT
GT500SVT 2 years ago
de que estas hablando 0-100 en 6 segundos.. estas mal
f4r20 2 years ago
los datos son de un microsat, un juez frio y duro, el gt500 realizo los 100 en 6.03 seg, ford afirma que lso hace en 4 seg, pero eso es en situaciones extremadamente ideales, como ya as de saber, pero en condiciones normales, como en una ciudad, el ford se queda en 6 seg, una cifra muy respetable y abrumadora, mas rapido que los autos que ya puse, no se como agan sus mediciones los de este video, pero dudo que los agan con al menos un dinamometro, checa que es un microsat brother, bye bye
GT500SVT 2 years ago
No comment !! Cause there is too many guy's who hate american car's !!! For what ?? Don't know ..... Gt500 2010 ..V
3boody2000 2 years ago
this car is a good example for waisting power,heavy weight kills everything power,handling...
this the same story about the transmation,this car has 40 more hp but still 0-60 time is 4.6!!!
SinaPouya90 2 years ago
who cares about the 0-60............ it's the quarter mile that counts......... it's faster in the quarter mile and it corners better than the previous mustang. Ford still uses the old mosaic technology, and yet still it out handles cars that are modern and much more expensive. I say Ford stepped up their game. I like the mustangs because they are well within budget, and they are cheap and easy to modify. You want a mustang that handles? $5000. and you're mustang will out handle at the track...
scorpiojudo 2 years ago 2
not even 5,000 bucks. just slap on that fr3 suspension kit from ford racing, some light weight ford racing wheels, good years eagle tires and a kenne belle super charger and ur good 2 go. that will come to around 2500 bucks
ryu1036 2 years ago
@ryu1036 doesnt a supercharger alone cost 2500 not even installed I dont know where your getting your prices must be on some "hot" shit.
dcinhere 2 years ago
theres this performance shop over here in staten island, ny that installs eaton superchargers for 1100 bucks.
ryu1036 2 years ago
@ryu1036 man that is a steal but thats to be expected in places like ny or california where there are a tone of shops. Here in Indianapolis lies the contradiction, sure the racing capital of the world, but it seems grass roots racing is expensive due to the lack of competing shops. I think ill come to NY. lol.
dcinhere 2 years ago
ny is awesome.
ryu1036 2 years ago
shut up idiot. everybody knows edmunds can't drive and they hate US cars.
The outgoing Mustang GT is in reality a sub 5-second car.
CJDUBstang 2 years ago 5
i liked the previous gen mustang more :(
directorjustin 2 years ago
this is a vast improvement over the last generation GT500.
wideopen704 2 years ago
So Car and Driver and Motortrend both get a 0-60 time in 4.3 sec. 4.0 w/ rollout...Why is edmunds always off? Should probably hire better drivers
alexjr90 2 years ago
i think they do there test on a drag strip or a special grooved road.
mazda6tuner99 2 years ago
it is not even about them,Both Motor Trend and Car and Driver got 335 to 60 in 4.8 but edmund's is 5.2!
edmunds time always are slower but 750 is different,edmunds 4.8 againt 5.2 car and driver!!!!
SinaPouya90 2 years ago
this car is sexy
joshblacker1 2 years ago
BTW FUCK UR SHOW AND UR TESTS!
killercobras 2 years ago
Are u guys fucking stupid, How the fuck can u test a car going the wrong way in a 1/4 and get correct readings???????????? That's why i hate your type of shows cuz thier lame and fucking WRONG!!! You guys are a cali speedway on the fucking slow down part of the endof the 1/4 mine!!!!!!!!! With no rubber!!!! 12.50's?? are u fucking serious?
killercobras 2 years ago
What are you talking about. This car is better looking and has more power. You are so full of shit saying that I tested the car with my "friends" and everyone hated it. You probably are a 8 year old kid who is not old enough to appreciate a good car when you see one.
amer1cancer2753 2 years ago 4
ugly shit , not even fast for a race car
and no comfort!!!
we tested and every1 says , i really hate it
johnnyzinho0 2 years ago
its not even a race car. i take my 06 gt to ford racing division store and they have every possible type of mustang you could want. they had racing circuit stangs, drag stangs, they even had sleeper stangs. if u dont like the car keep it to ur self no one wants to here ur negativity on a truly amazing car.
mazda6tuner99 2 years ago
...ugly thing...
bboyconcon 2 years ago
i hate the back... totally ruins the look
leftynic 2 years ago
love the slalom part
gunluvS14 2 years ago
Retards the car as nose heavy as it is with its shitty rubber, just pulled damn near 70miles per hour through a 700 ft slalom. Shit TV like Top Gear who hates this car had it lapping its road course fater then E46m3 CSL and new STi. CSL on pilot cups! You can hate it all you want but you cant change the facts!
Beeba1 2 years ago
They had an s917 Shelby not the 2010 Gt500 on Top Gear. It wasn't the GT500 that beat the CSL and Viper, it was an S197 Stage 3 Roush Mustang which is about 300lbs lighter then the GT500. BTW they didn't hate the Roush, Clarkson has a Ford GT and a Roush in his garage.
hieuluu2 2 years ago
You are correct that it was the 2008 gt500. not this 2010 on top gear. but it was the gt500 that lapped faster then the csl. Right after it was run as usual the time was placed on the board. Right above the CSL and STi. The Roush while a nice car is not a GT500. All truly irelevant, fact is the car does quite well for what it is. Looks like the 2010 takes that up a notch. By the way no matter who tests this car no matter how much they say its heay etc, they always have a huge smile driving it.
Beeba1 2 years ago
Hammond drove a blue GT500, then Jeremy compared a Roush to the GT500, then they had a silver Roush against a Lotus with the Stig driving the Lotus. After they had a Blue GT500 driving by the Stig with a time of 1:30, slower then a WRX faster then a Golf R32. With only 415HP, the Roush destroyed the Gt500 with 1:28 beating CSL, Viper SRT10, 911S. Just do a youtube search "mustang gt500 top gear" click on the 9min version ;)
hieuluu2 2 years ago
That was the old GT500. The new one has more horses, better suspension and steering.
AlloyDiesel 2 years ago
that was the old gt500 not this 1..... This 1 has updated everything, exterior, interior, suspension and hp.
highflyer4 2 years ago
The Viper and 911 were tested in the wet. Still the roush is stil VERY fast.
xxMafia101 2 years ago
this car is great in a straight line lol
akvalues 2 years ago
1SirCarlton, you better do some research before you make incorrect statements. Youtube was not designed in amerika. LOL
Georgenfla 2 years ago
if the rear tires were just abit fatter and wider..and if it had better suspension and brakes...this car would handle better
torquemenistan 2 years ago
Amerika doesn't deserve to be spelled correctly. ASSHOLE!
Georgenfla 2 years ago
I'm a GM man and a big Camaro fan but I will respect any good car.
The 2010 GT500 is an awesome car and a great performance bargain. Still not a huge fan of the new rear tailights but they are starting to grow on me. The thing that makes a car like the GT500 great is how easy it is to mod them. Pully and bolt-ons can net over 100rwhp gain. Hell they will handle about 800rwhp on stock internals. Some have handled up to 1,000rwhp with a great tune.
MJND1990 2 years ago 2
being lighter improves everything except for top speed I think
SouthernRR4501 2 years ago
gorgeous car but the antenna should be integrated
kenflyguy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I wouldve thought a car from such a powerful country wouldnt look and handle like such a piece of shit! Why do amerikans like those sissy colors? In my country, only a woman would drive a car that color. And, only a retarded woman would buy an amerikan junk!
Georgenfla 2 years ago
Well, there is the Corvette, and the Dodge Viper, the Ford GT and....the ULTIMATE AERO!!!!! Which blows the Bugatti Veron off the track in every performance aspect.
SouthernRR4501 2 years ago
Well at least you know what a "piece of shit" is... most likely because you are one.
How about "Douche Bag?" Do you know what one of those is? Cause you are one of those too.
Oh... and its "American" not "Amerikan".
Learn to spell before you talk shit because you just sound really ignorant.
Fuck.
axiomsolo 2 years ago
only a "retard" would spell as bad as you lol.
storm1580 2 years ago
yet your typing your comment on a website that MADE in America
1SirCarlton 2 years ago
@Georgenfla - Really because your country was most likely saved by fighting Americans in the past. Douchebag. Keep talking trash while you know there isn't an American standing around the corner waiting to feed you your teeth.
panthersblow 1 year ago
Ford should have used the aluminum 5.4 from the Ford GT.
SouthernRR4501 2 years ago 2
The Aluminum GT Block was designed for dry sump oiling and the dry sump oiling system won't fit in the mustang.
1vdn992 2 years ago
Well, they need to redesign it.
SouthernRR4501 2 years ago
Yeah, buy a hennessey 2010 camaro 556 hp, on 98 octane for $63,000
Sorry no bankrupt garbage, just a poorly managed company and mediocre engineering.
1vdn992 2 years ago
I bet the back end goes crazy while braking and cornering at the same time judging by how much the weight shifts in the braking tests.
DCN1234567 2 years ago
Hmm... Check out the video called "Fast New Shelby Mustang GT500 Full Test" by InsideLineVideo. They got 0-60 in 4.3 seconds and 4.0 w/roll out. I'm guessing they had a better driver at that time?
818silencer818 2 years ago
or they want people to think the camaro is faster...i doubt it is. the SS is barely faster than the GT even with 100+ more hp
1SirCarlton 2 years ago
That car looks great but I'm not really impressed with it's performance.
ThatEvilGuy 2 years ago
It's the best you can get for $46,000 no doubt about it.
818silencer818 2 years ago
I personally would take that 46k and get a lightly used (10 to15k miles) 08 model and spend around 18 to 20K buying it and then spend the rest on upgrades. I would have a faster, better handling, unique mustang. Just my opinion :)
killler73 2 years ago
That would work out, but you would have to fork out the rest of the 20k out of your pocket to upgrade it. Or you could just make a monthly payment for one of these =]. That's true though, you could make an 08 Mustang faster, but you would have to have the cash.
818silencer818 2 years ago
Agreed.
killler73 2 years ago
i so fell in love with dat car.BEAST!!!
papspito 2 years ago
go numbers for the mustang but it's no Zo6.
XOLANIABLE 2 years ago
Even has less sway than the camaro coming to a stop.
DeadR4bbit 2 years ago
That's not a car for race...just for autobahn
Dimitri04arshavin 2 years ago
i love this car the new one is better than the old ones
Shelby500nos 2 years ago
i want an old camaro.. badass
cheese22092 2 years ago
a lighter car maybe?
CharlieHorn7 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
moaski 2 years ago
the mustang gt stops faster than yhe gt500? lol. how did that happen?
muscletruckdude 2 years ago 2
GT500 is about 300 more pounds.
sdlausen 2 years ago
man i would spill my beer all over me braking in that thing
gaberson38 2 years ago 2
If you look at the Mustang vs Camaro vs Challenger video by motortrend, the Mustang GT, pulls off almost the same numbers, other then the 0-60 which isn't far off.
I think this car was a dud.
I'd have to see another test done in another car!
djsabourin 2 years ago
omg a lot of brake tilt
thebmwfan 2 years ago
cause it's pretty nose heavy. cast iron block, plus a suprcharger.
aieljose 2 years ago
yeah some one also recorded 3.9 to 60 on the KR essentially the same car as the 2010 model
andrestnt 2 years ago
except the tires on the KR are MUCH better than any standard GT500
2007ShelbyCobra 2 years ago
Not a ford fan
But not bad at all.
Russell042 2 years ago
i know there stats variey a lot huh.
it will be different sometimese
Storvick1011 2 years ago
straight line speeds seems to be lacking
solid axle and 510+rwhp and barely manages 115mph trap?
ph00ny1 2 years ago
take in consideration that the car almost weighs 2 tons
juancobravenom 2 years ago
which car doesn't weigh 2 tons these days?
ph00ny1 2 years ago 3
True
FirebirdKnight 2 years ago
very true, everything these days is getting bigger and bigger.
juancobravenom 2 years ago
they should make a cobra that will bring the old memories back
imking7 2 years ago
That's high performance in ever aspect! This is the first time in a LONG time that I feel a Mustang would be a awesome.
asdfgoogle 2 years ago
I love this car i really do it just sounds so plain badass
BlackTransAmdude 2 years ago
dam.... listen to the 0-60.........
strait up burns out in 3rd gear..
fuk thats pretty good.
Howie262 2 years ago
kinda only cuz the car is so heavy is why it does that
LotsOfPaypa 2 years ago
looks so sexy through the slalom.
firesquare16 2 years ago
Ford made a good looking car for once.
Except for the GT.
Nice.
ShortySIG552 2 years ago
how would this car compare to the new grand sport..a c6 with z06 brakes and suspension...these two cars are pretty close in price too
Mrgnoyeneg 2 years ago 2
Good comparison. The Grand Sport would beat it.
However, this new GT500 out-handles a regularly equipped, C6.
I think that's why GM came out with the Grand Sport version.
moaski 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I expected more from a GT500.
fail.
rubiks15 2 years ago
yea, i dont like it to much, it's better the last one, KR was the best....
robe2708 2 years ago
Hell yea it would!!
supersayin1 2 years ago
Hey guy Wouldn't it be cool if Chevey came out with an SYC version to the Camero I's say 700 to 800hp Supercharged with the old retro colors!!! A Yank vs the Shelby KR Supersnake would be an amazing fist fight!
supersayin1 2 years ago 2
man this is a sexy beast
NOTHINGbutCOMEDY 2 years ago
did anyone else see that huge nose dive under braking? they should make those shocks stiffer.
abm89 2 years ago
Was something wrong with the first test they did? Search Fast New Shelby Mustang GT500 Full Test in the youtube search bar. Insideline already did a test and got better times, 0-60 of 4.3, 4.0 with rollout. Why did they do this again? And how did the car get slower? Can I get a reply insideline? please I believe the first video as a 4.6 0-60 is very low for this car.
gunzkevin 2 years ago
Yep
what was that all about !!
legendray2008 2 years ago
Idk, and insideline won't reply to me :^(
gunzkevin 2 years ago
perhaps they were using a different year???i really don't know,but like u i would also like 2 know what happened...irregardless,this car kicked the Camaro's ass woooo!!!
Spartanwarrioromega 2 years ago
Well in the other vid they say new shelby gt500 and it was the style of the 2010 so it was the same car. And yea, that and the challenger but, what doesn't.
gunzkevin 2 years ago
other magazines that have people who can drive got 0-60 in 4.2 sec and 4.0 W/ roll out.
112namrepus 2 years ago
nice i was surprised by the handling especially considering it's got a live axle.
XxViciousxX 2 years ago
Yeah, Ford engineers have been as stubborn about the live axle as Porsche engineers have been about the rear engine layout. The joke is, after absurd amounts of time studying it, they finally figured out a solution.
quuaa1 2 years ago
shelby is such a great car,my friend has one,and its sick
deagle94 2 years ago
ugly and heavy
ilikenarutoalot 2 years ago
damn right original was cooler
NAWELYORR 2 years ago
looks like they made it totally right this time. the skid pad reading is an insane .93g. win for mechanical grip. and it just looks mean and powerful like it's going to eat the road and the ass of your car. great work ford, really
OddManOut23 2 years ago
this car has really impressive performance...and looks!
warhawkpro 2 years ago
Through the years all the Ford `s Mustangs are improving when it comes to power and specially handling
lovecars890 2 years ago
is it just me or did the car's body get taller?
TheRealAtello 2 years ago
Its the rear of the car
zizoubilly 2 years ago
man what a beautiful car.
mitch9521 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
slow and gay
8jamesj8 2 years ago
yea whatever, what do you drive then?
thugnut94 2 years ago
you dont drive this car do you?
8jamesj8 2 years ago
now how cool is that
1969MustangMACH1 2 years ago
Sexy beast but the 0-60 time went from 4 seconds flat to 4.6,come on edmunds be more consistent with your times.
nokia3591 2 years ago
Times all depend on weather conditions such as humidity and temperature.
sdlausen 2 years ago 3
Also it depends if they use rollout or not.
b0nes2 2 years ago
The front of this ford looks bad fuckin ass but the back is okish!
sterlingnobles 2 years ago
what a beauty!
mikeellis88 2 years ago
This is a fast and bad ass mustang!
5*****
chevyman217 2 years ago
nice car!!
jattpunjabi93 2 years ago
Comment removed
chevyman217 2 years ago
AMAZING!!!
exoticcar2009 2 years ago
why is the quality so bad?
slzkilla 2 years ago
first!!!!!!!!!!!!
lilunits 2 years ago