The Neanderthal skull shown in this video is really long! And the nasal appertures are really large! I would love to see it fleshed out by an expert, to know what it looked like!
1 of X This idea of human evolving from fish is the delusion of Evolution. Evolution is not science, that is where you are mistaken. It is a myth that gives hope for humans that they are evolving.
When the facts are opposite. There are way more than 4600 genetic defects in humans causing disease. There are 4 "positive" mutations that are not verifiable but one. That is the Truth. It is up to you to find your own truth. Objective awareness requires a special mind, trained to not believe.
2 of X You need to understand the power of suggestion and faith. The TV is filled with this religious crap on evolution. The minds of children are weak and easy to mold into conformity. They only want to survive and to conform to the culture. Children are not about seeking the truth, but about being molded into conforming. This is why there are 320 million jihadists who want to kill. There are no "good" forms of indoctrination. All that brings false faith and belief is the problem.
3 of X Evolution is a religion; Without any doubts. In the last 20 years we have been gathering the data from DNA that only shows genetic losses from mutations in all complex creatures. That is absolute, can't be refuted, obvious, beyond anyone's ability to change by faith and belief. It took nearly 150 years after the evidence showing the earth was not flat, before the paid scientist believers all died out. That is the nature of faith belief and indoctrination.
4 of X We know for a fact that there is no biological mechanism shown in any DNA other than genetic loss. 100% of the people on earth have genetic diseases and we are gaining more new diseases constantly.
1 in 12 in the US have diabetes. 1 in 8 women get breast cancer. There are so many diseases from mutations, yet some weak people want to believe in evolution.
Why don't you know this? Who is keeping this from you? Why do they believe in and teach religious nonsense being taught as "science"?
5 of X "How will we live with each other?" The way we have lived with belief systems and ideology forever, by killing each other in the name of "good". Evolution kills us in the name of ignorance. Avoiding the reality of genetic degradation is not going to promote health. There is nothing that humans can do against their own delusions and ignorance they perpetuate in the name of "being good". Only God can fix this. There is your answer. The Truth will set you free. Stop believing humans.
6 of X Maybe you need to get free from the control you give to human faith and beliefs. For the most part all that you have faith and belief in, is not real. There may be 5% truth in it, the rest is the mental modulations of what your emotions do to you. People want to believe their parents, teachers, etc and there is the perfect scenario of blind teaching the blind out of goodness.
7 of X • If you really want the Truth, then you will find it. If all you want to do is perpetuate, yours and others beliefs, then that is what you will get. There are many paths towards freedom, but very few actually want it. Organic compulsions, ego, and needs, are the driving force of ignorance.
8 of X If you can find any interpretation of evidence for evolution that is NOT tainted with belief, then you are not a scientist. A real scientist is objective and has no beliefs.
So, far the "elephant in the room" in all papers on this pseudo science is this faith and belief that evolution must be true, but that is all I have read in the 28,000 papers on evolution and biology. Using the word "evolution" hundreds of billions of times does not make it real.
@GoodScienceForYou How many sock accounts do you have now? It looks like at least 10 since nobody else if thumbing up your comments. You are pathetic in that you have to try and vote your comments up and they are nothing but spam.
We have two kind of people: the FIRST doesn't believe in "Out of Africa" for being racist and white-nationalist. They also think the brain size is important even if woman have more gray matter but got less Nobel Prizes.
The SECOND, doesn't believe in "Out of Africa" for being a religious man and swear we came from Adam. They also think the brain size is important even if atheists have larger brains than they have.
you sound just as judgmental as the second group you make assumptions about and antagonize. if you wish to challenge someone else's view point, ad hominem is not an intelligent way to do so. you're making a moral issue out of a scientific question. recent evidence for instance shows that both neanderthals and the newly discovered denisova hominid both contributed to the gene pool of modern humans, which goes against a strict interpretation of the Out of Africa theory.
The new theory (May 2010) is that African humans hybridized with Neanderthals and produced Eurasian humans (1 to 4 % NM).
The flaw in the theory is that NM had more ape-like DNA in mtDNA and nuclear, which does not show in Eurasians. Also Eurasians have X-chromosome match to NM, not Africans.
The answer is that NM was final product of human hybridization with apes. NM was result of human male with Eurasian DNA mating with female homo-whatever, probably Denisovans, exterminated by massive flood
@AlanCFA That hypothesis was not far off. Not one single geneticists could disprove it. That is because we are related to the chimp and the gorilla and the ancients were far closer than now. The mDNA of the Neanderthal is said to be more "chimp like". Do you know any of this?
@GoodScienceForYou "Not one single geneticists could disprove it. " Name one who tried. You cannot. Your hypothesis is refuted by your OWN writings. You now write "You cannot breed with any species other than your own" which contradicts your earlier writing.
You now claim that Neanderthals were human and previously claimed that humans mated with chimps to produce them. You are so desperate to protect your religious beliefs that you make up crap constantly.
Cro-magnon is a neanderthal type. Cojan uds un cráneo de chihuahua y uno de un labrador o un rottwailer. Son de la misma especie... jijiji Hay una palabra que define esa herramienta de la foto. En El idioma más antiguo,un idioma neanderthal:EUSKARA. Aitzol = stone ax Y hay otra en ese mismo idioma que define una superficie de hielo. Horma = ice-wall or ice-floor Neanderthal has the technology. Ergaster has the posibility to survive in hot times. 20 000 years in coexistence. no wars. rare
Sorry to see you've been visited by that creationist loon Mr. GoodScienceForYou and his myriad of sock accounts(so he can vote up his own stupid comments) - but then he has such a sad life it's apparently his only real pleasure these days. When he claimed that humans had mated with gorillas to produce chimps and orang-utans I almost pissed myself laughing!
@AlanCFA It is amazing that you are this stupid. I gave you all the information you need to get free from all religious crap, yet you cling to this religious human garbage belief. I do have empathy for you, but you choose death over life. With your mind, I can understand, that life is not a good thing for you, because ignorance is the ultimate cause of suffering.
@GoodScienceForYou "It is amazing that you are this stupid. I gave you all the information you need to get free from all religious crap,..." you keep repeating that stupid phrase. There is lots of evidence for evolution, none for creation. You are the religious fanatic partaking in cults like Jehovah's Witnesses and Siddha Yoga.
You have NEVER studied the theory of evolution, you do NOT have an IQ of 180, and you ARE a liar.
Evolution: "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.
This has never been seen in any biological specimins. There are no one cell creatures that magically became complex. There is no evolution on this planet.
@ti3nt ....I guess it takes one to know one because your ass is a neanderthal offspring. all non sub-saharan africans have 1-9% neanderthal dna. that means you #igger. :)
@Moronvideos1940 You have to look at the brain size relative to the size of the animal. You also have to look at the amount of grey matter. To flat out deny that brain size has no correlation with intelligence is beyond retarded.
.EVITCUDORP EB DNA EVIL OT LLIW YM NAHT RETAERG GNITTEG SI NOISSERPPO S'ELPOEP KCALB EHT
?ECITSUJ ROF PU SDNATS DNA TUO SEIRRAC YLLAUTCA OHW YRUJ EHT NO NOSREP NAISA RO ETIHW YNA NO SEMAN EKAT LLIW YRUJ A NO ELPOEP KCALB YNA NAEM TAHT SEOD OS
Isnt this video a little out of date? And hasnt it become clear that modern Europeans have neanderthal dna? In fact everyone has but Africans? If true this means that there was interbreeding and that we are the result. And wouldnt it be right that if interbreeding took place and produced fertile offspring then by definition Neanderthals now need to be considered as "human"?
Neanderthals might have been even more Intelligent than our early ancestors since their brains were larger.. I think the reason we succeeded it's because we were very social and liked to work in team.. Unlike the Neanderthals, they were only living in small groups..and that really does not help when you are in competition ..but then again I might be wrong..what do we really now anyway..it's a long time ago..I do believe in the interbreeding of cro-magnon and the neanderthal
@EuropeanGuy87 The "Herto" is a predecessor of modern humans and had a much larger brain capacity. Because in DNA we ONLY see a genetic degradation from extremely fit to now over 4500 known genetic diseases shown in DNA mutations, you can easily understand that we have only de-evolved by our bad habits of destroying our genome. Neanderthal, is most likely a human offshoot, or race not a different species. If we bred with them, they are/were the same species by definition.
When people are confronted with absolute evidence against any form of "evolution" then they start repeating religious slogans as if they were real.
"Evolution comes from natural selection, not from DNA". What sort of a moron would say shit like that? Brainwashing is a horrible thing and weak minds.
@GoodScienceForYou It's amazing just how many words you write without saying anything. You call people various names and then don't explain what you're talking about. Instead of saying "you're stupid" why don't actually explain yourself?
@GoodScienceForYou Implying I don't understand english is ridiculous because I am in fact clearly writing in fluent English. That makes your statement an Ad Hominem attack which tells me that you have nothing to say and are trying to redirect attention. Do you really have that little to add to the conversation? All I am asking for is an explanation. Why are you so obsessed with mutations? just answer that one easy little question. Forget the other questions. Just answer that one.
@simchamo It would be good for you if you took some time to go to google it: "Neutral Evolution Forum" and learn what is going on. You don't seem to be able to comprehend simple scientific data. If over 70% of the mutations which the Evotards say cause evolution are bad, deleterious, and 1% might be positive, then that is 70 to 1 against any form of net positive evolution. We have over 4500 cataloged genetic defects in the human species. That is impossible if evolution were true.
" If over 70% of the mutations which the Evotards say cause evolution are bad..."
How many times do I need to say this? Evolutionary theory does not claim mutations causes evolution. Mutations don't cause evolution. Mutations don't cause evolution. Evolution and mutation are two different things, they aren't the same, they are not equivalent. they are different. The two are not the same.Etc etc...
P.S. Calling people who support the theory "evotards" is seriously petty.
@simchamo You can say crap all day long, but if it doesn't fit the evidence then you are insane, retarded. and a waste of time.
Maybe you have not studied this theory of evolution like I have off and on for the last 43 years. There is no evolution,There is no evolution. There is only a series of overwhelming deleterious mutations, over 4500 so far, that are degenerating the human genome.
@GoodScienceForYou Clearly you haven't studied evolution for the past 43 years; you have studied deleterious genomic mutations. So again. I'll keep on trying to explain this. 70% of mutations are deleterious. Thats fine. I have no quarrel with that. but mutations have little to nothing to do with evolution. evolution is simply changes in POPULATION over time, not changes in an individual over time. Deleterious mutations cause fitness to decrease which is why we are not a sick population.
@simchamo You are under the illusion that we are not a sick population. Over 50% of adults in the US are taking medicines for mental illness. We force feed amphetamines to children to help them to learn, because their minds wander all the time and have no concentration. 1 in 3 people will die from cancer. Our life times are shortened by diseases and genetic defects. The only thing that keeps us going is artificial means, heart surgery, artificial joints, and drugs with severe side effects.
@GoodScienceForYou The overall IQ of people is going down, especially in affluent societies with bad foods, and bad drugs, bad lifestyles. The USA is number 28 in science and is going down in intelligence. Radiation from all forms is destroying brain cells along with chemicals in foods, and you think we are better off.
The delusion of evolution is this magical bullshit that has never happened. There are no magical mutations that fix degeneration and genetic degradation.
Science? I don't think so! Actually, IQs are far higher than they were a hundred years ago. The demands of the environment (using computers, mobile phones, etc) means that we are just getting brighter and brighter.
@alan111best "Actually, IQs are far higher than they were a hundred years ago." = ridiculous statement.
There's no way for you to even make a statement like that. We know that 50% of the adults in the USA are on drugs for mental problems. We know that people are strapping on bombs and blowing themselves up. We have more wars going on all the time. We have tremendous poverty and people dying of starvation. We still hate one another over stupid ideologies and you think we are smarter?
@alan111best The Herto had a larger brain capacity that modern humans. The only thing that saves us is the fact that we have not used the full potential of the human brain which is losing its fitness from every generation to the next. The capacity for knowledge has been in the human mind since the beginning.
@GoodScienceForYou mental illness, with the exception of suicidal behavior, has nothing to do with mortality/overall population health. it certainly has very little to do with the human genome. 1 in 3 people diagnosed with cancer dies from it, but in 2009 one fifth of one percent of the american population died of cancer. Rates of cancer death is directly correlated with age. the older you are the more likely you are to die of cancer. Look at cancer rates among reproducing adults. Way less.
@GoodScienceForYou Furthermore, You can't only look at human population when talking about evolution. Is the general global biology substantially healthier or sicker than it has been in the past 600 million years? No. Some go extinct, some thrive.
50% of people are not mentally ill! Again, facts?????
No, many people take pills for anxiety and so on - that just shows how good the drug companies are at selling their junk.
1 in 3 die from cancer because we live so long - we have never had such a huge life expectancy - cancer affects some younger people but it is mainly the effect of old age. The longer we live the more of us will die from illness rather than accident, etc. We have to die of something!
@alan111best "50% of people are not mentally ill! Again, facts?????" In order to get medications for mental illness you have to be diagnosed as mentally ill. DUH! I know one psychiatrist who actually thinks "we need to put Prozac in the water supply". This is exactly what she said to me. According to her 100% of humans are mentally ill. It is because humans block the truth and prefer fairy tales and we have no clue how we screw up our own mind with HEMG from human garbage beliefs.
@alan111best "We have to die of something!" If the human genome was brought back to its condition of perfection then we would not degrade and die from "old age". There would be no "old age". Scientists have no reasons for old age. They see the degeneration but they don't have a clue why the cells don't continue to replicate perfectly forever. Death is just accepted as if it was an absolute truth. If we did not have the 4500+ genetic defects, we would live a LOOONNNGG time.
@GoodScienceForYou are you a creationist ? i mean one of those guys who think species magically appeared at the will of a deity ?... and the Earth is 7000 years old ? can you answer me to those questions so i can see where you stand ? cause when you're dismissing evidence based science then you must have an alternative way on how to understand reality.
@wedingo 1o2 The Earth is not 6 or 7K years old an it is also not 4.7 billion years. This is because the methods used are flawed, utterly flawed. The only way to determine the age of the universe is by continual interpolation of data from observation in space. There is no way to know the decay rate of materials from billions of years ago.
We know from particle physics that matter gains in density when it accelerates and is sped up. The universe is constantly accelerating matter is more dense.
@gregrutz The age of the earth and the universe is totally not verifiable by any standard calibration methods. There is no way to verify assumptions based on faith belief and tiny minded ideas.
@gregrutz 1 of 2 Do you understand the word "assumptions", "belief", "ideology". There is NO WAY to verify that radiometric dating is accurate at all. It is base solely on assumptions that radioactive matter has always decayed at the same rate. We know for a fact that time is accelerating. Speeding up and matter is more dense as the universe expands and accelerates. Black holes are extremely dense matter travelling faster than the speed of light from our relative perspective.
@GoodScienceForYou actually, didnt the radio carbon dating of absolute year-dated tree rings of demonstrable age and contextually dated wooden objects in Egypt and elsewhere provide some confidence that c-14 dating works? Convinced me. The context here is that we have surviving organic matter which is already dated in some other way to provide a check. Like the dynastic sequences in Egypt. Actually recorded in writing. The objects match(more or less)their c-14 dates
@CobinRain C-14 is not used on replacement fossils, and C-14 dating is problematic in that contamination from air carrying organisms will screw up this concept. 10,000 years of maybe possible calibration is not good enough for 4.7 billion years of projection. That is like looking at a 47 mile long road in complete darkness with a flashlight that only shines 6 inches. It is human emotional mental garbage. /watch?v=JntCa6FssRQ
@GoodScienceForYou Archaeologists are aware of the shortcomings of C-14 dating but find it a useful tool back to about 80,000 BC. The contamination you speak of can occur but no one puts much faith in a single date and so it is clusters of dates associated with artifacts, toolkits etc that give confidence. And you appear to misunderstand the concept when you say C-14 is not iused on "replacement fossils". Of course not. Only organic material.
@CobinRain I understand this better than anyone. I know all of the flaws in this system and have made presentations on them. The Radiometric dating is nothing more than a lot of assumptions on replacement fossils. Once the chemicals replace the bones they cannot be dated at all. Click on the video supplied in the "Video Responses" and listen and read carefully so you understand the utter logical fallacy of dating replacement fossils.
@GoodScienceForYou You do not "understand this better than anyone". You are very exercised to explain to others that you cant date fossils. But you are only say ing this because you do not understand the basic principles of archaeology--concepts of assemblage, stratigraphy and association. For example: the fossilised early homo bones and associated tools in the Rift Valley were dated by using Potassium Argon dating to date the lava layers that sandwiched the fossiliferous layer.
@CobinRain 1 of 2 Go to the videos as I suggested. Since there is ONLY genetic degradation shown in DNA evidence and all evidence of ALL multicellular creatures, you need to realize that this dating is utterly worthless.
It is far more likely that the "hominids" are human species that were degraded by radioactive water or food supply. They mutated (degenerated) rapidly from the radiation. That is why Chimps for instance show only signs of being de-evolved from a superior human.
@CobinRain 2 of 2 Since chimps and humans are "Cousins" and there is ONLY degradation shown in all the DNA samples, then there is no evolution. It is obvious from ALL the evidence.
The radiometric dating is dating the radiation that caused the degeneration. In places near volcanoes is a lot of radioactive matter. The Macaque monkey in Japan is a perfect example of extremely degraded humans from radiation in volcanic "hot springs". I posted the evidence "Neutral Evolution Forum".
@CobinRain You see, in real science we go with the absolutely irrefutable evidence first. Then see where the rest of the evidence fits. All the hominids are most likely degenerated to the point of extinction, humans who simply were too scientifically illiterate to know not to drink radioactive water or soak in radioactive hot springs.
DNA ONLY shows degeneration from a much more fit superior human creature. DNA cannot be argued with. Fairy tales of "evolution" is mythology with no evidence.
The reason why there are no trails of evolution is because they are obviously trails of hominid extinction from genetic degradation. This fits perfectly with the absolutely irrefutable physical evidence of DNA.
@CobinRain When the fossils only show extinction, then there must be a scientific reason for that. They simply stopped living when they became so degraded genetically they could not live. Humans are heading in the same direction. We have over 4500 genetic defects that are recognized as diseases. Then there are other genetic degradations that simply have caused weaknesses and less muscle strength. Chimps are over two times stronger muscles than humans. They retained that cell replication.
@GoodScienceForYou " When the fossils only show extinction, then there must be a scientific reason for that. They simply stopped living when they became so degraded genetically they could not live "
@wowamonn The evidence in in the DNA of all creatures. There is ONLY genetic degradation shown in ALL DNA evidence. If you don't know this you are not a scientist. The trails of all the "hominids" is a dead end with extinction. Go look at my videos. It is clear as can be.
@wowamonn You see, in real science we go with the absolutely irrefutable evidence first. Then see where the rest of the evidence fits. All the hominids are most likely degenerated to the point of extinction, humans who simply were too scientifically illiterate to know not to drink radioactive water or soak in radioactive hot springs.
DNA ONLY shows degeneration from a much more fit superior human creature. DNA cannot be argued with. Fairy tales of "evolution" is mythology with no evidence.
@gregrutz 2 of 2 In particle physics known; when matter is accelerated it gains mass. Since the entire universe is accelerating, & gaining in mass, then the rate of decay cannot possible be the same a long long time ago. When you're standing on a tiny speck if time & space you think that is all there is. Only morons do not have the capacity to integrated up to 1000 scientific facts as I do. This is why there is pure lead on this earth with no U in site. Much more rapid decay of U in the past.
@wedingo 2o2 Since we know that molecules, atoms are much more dense now than in the past, then the decay rate of uranium and other radioactive isotopes has changed over time. It decayed much faster in ancient times. The "attraction" of matter has become stronger, so decay rates are much slower now.
There is pure lead on this earth. It ONLY comes from the total decay of Uranium. So that is impossible if decay rates are always the same.
@wedingo Humans and all creatures were made, by some phenomenal intelligent "Genetic Engineer". This is known because there is ONLY genetic degradation shown in all DNA from the living ancestors to the speciated descendants. Humans have over 4500 genetic defects. That is impossible if "evolution" were true. No humans are getting better or more intelligent, there is only the opposite in actual irrefutable physical evidence in DNA.
@GoodScienceForYou 4500 genetic defects, yet we survive and reproduce. You mean not only we don't evolve, but we are only getting worse ? I could agree to that since we don't obey the natural selection rule anymore, we can reproduce regardless of our level of physical fitness or intellect. But what about the rest of the animals ? If "genetic engineering" created all the animals, then it also released them in the perfect habitat for them to survive, or otherwise it doesn't make sense, right ?
@wedingo Go look at the rest of the animals. They have all reduced fitness from the ancient versions. In the groups of creatures where we have the oldest still surviving and not de-evolving to much, like the Gecko which is 100 MYO by the dumb ass radiometric dating system, it descendants are all less complex. The Gecko is the parent of even snakes that have lost legs. Original habitat has changed obviously and millions are extinct, from genetic degradation and lack of fitness to survive.
@gregrutz Evolution does not work. Evolution: "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.
This has never happened in biology. There is only constant degeneration from much more fit, and much more complex creatures shown in ALL evidence.
@wedingo Humans are heading for extinction, by the way. We continue to do the things that destroy our genomes; culturing all sorts of virus, microorganisms, that will attack at the germ level during reproduction mutating the human egg and sperm; where the heavy duty mutations occur, from poor sexual conduct. Many sex partners and many cultured new virus and bacteria in the sexual parts in human body. There is a rule book that tells us how to have sex for preservation of the human species.
@GoodScienceForYou a rule book for having sex ? what the hell are you talking about ? How does sexual conduct influence the altering of genome ?
Of course humans are heading for extinction sooner or later, that is a genuine truth that applies to every specie that ever lived. We're on a planet orbiting around a star with limited lifespan, and there are also lots of other disaster possibilities that can end life instantly or gradually. But i'm sure we're not gonna wipe cause of having wrong sex .
@wedingo Genetic mutations in the female at the time of conception is particularly bad, It comes from virus, fungus, bacteria that attacks the egg and sperm. This is the worst form of genetic mutation there is and it is permanent. It is the ERV's in action which screw up the smooth flow of information. Please, goto "Neutral Evolution Forum" and read the threads with "Objective Morality". There are two of them. I list all the mutated diseases (CDC) we have made from incorrect sexual contact.
@wedingo This is why it is recommended if you are going to reproduce or have the slightest possibly of pregnancy with a mate that you 1/ Be completely loyal sexually to them. 2/ Be checked out for any STDs. and clean of all of them before you try to have children 3/ Don't risk any microbes by having anal sex and putting the male organ directly into the female after anal penetration. That can cause horrible mutations in the egg and sperm. If you want the best possible fetus then that is it.
@wedingo Also, you may want to see if you or your mate carry any genetic defects that when combined have a high chance of passing on genetic diseases to the child. It is best if you mate with someone of different genetic lineage altogether so that the defects may be removed in the offspring. This is the only way at the present time of watering down bad genes and making them go away. This is why sickle cell anemia has been reduced drastically in African Americans who are mixed with other races
@wedingo Check out Potholder54's videos on crockoduck award nominations and you will see the story behind this clown. He is the definition of mental illness. You are not going to be able to reason with him.
The classification Neandethal has been debated for a while now and there are physical anthropologists who are sympathetic to reclassifying Neanderthal as a subspecies of homo sapiens. Distinguishing characteristics are cranial capacity and other morphological features both cranial and post cranial (more pronounced brow ridge is one of the big ones) The Neanderthals did not use the same subsistence strategies as homo sapiens, they relied more heavily on meat and required more calories to function
theyv probably made up all this shit about neanderthals, because they came up with this theory we all came from africa, and it doesnt jive.. if you think scientists tell the truth about everything, youre part of the majority of brainwashed sheep that believe anything your authorities tell you, whether it be government, science or religion...youre all being led around like cattle.. go ahead and pretend youre smart
@dogons2k12 I don't live in a fantasy world. I am not afraid of the truth as you are. It is far better to be ignorant for dumb people, as yourself. Only stupid people believe in the magical evolution fairy.
@dogons2k12 I suggest for your sake that you go listen to all my videos, and understand what real science is all about. I do my own research and seek my own truth. Others have done the same thing, and so can you. You do not have to conform to religious ideolgy of the Evotards. You can find out what is really going on for yourself, if you have any intelligence and are not just a weak willed sheep of social human garbage that has been shoved into your brain.
@dogons2k12 What I know is that the real "family" of mankinds parent of the genetic species is not tracible. Where man was first on this planet has not been found. The Herto, the MCFA of female and male, the ancestors of both the Neanderthaler and the humans is unknown. But by genetic science we know that in order to breed, they must have the same genetics and are from the same genetic lineage. There is only genetic degradation and losses with time.
@GoodScienceForYou you are nothing but an INTERBRED INDIAN ALBINO who fled to colder regions towards Europe. When you arrived in Europe you met the Khoisan man who was already in Europe.
Your history starts at 800 BC remains dormant after the fall of ROME and picks back up after the defeat of BLACK MUSLIMS who colonized Europe for almost 800 years.
@dogons2k12 This has nothing to do with the entire premise of evolution. There is no evolution there is only a constant genetic loss as time goes on. There is no such thing as any "net positive" improvements because DNA studies destroy that idea. All creatures of prior generations were more fit and have gradually degraded.
Humans are degrading faster than ever, because of lifestyle and ignorance of science.
Once you realize that this whole religion of Evodelusionism is split up in lots of belief systems, it becomes clear that it is a religious ideolgy. Hint; radiometric dating is utter bullshit.
The only physical evidence we have ONLY shows genetic degradation as the absolute clear, irrefutable evidence. Therefore there is no such thing as evolution of simple life to complex life.
@GoodScienceForYou I never once believed the 'Out of Africa' theory, not once, the reason this 'Out of Africa' idea came was simply because they found a skeleton set there that pre-dated every other skeleton or bone set in the world.
It seems the myth remained however by either PC Marxist types and those trying to use it as a weapon against racism.
We now know that everybody else in the world, particularly Europe, has a small but significant percentage of Neanderthal in them apart from Africa.
the neanderthal IS human. its a different human race. there is also otthetr races that vanished like the mini. and people of add. they were giants. it doesnt mean u should support darwin. its jus RACES
Human races are all human beings from one root, they can have sex and get children but if a neanderthal had sex with human they could not get children. If a monkey have sex with a human they will not get children. Why you say something you don't know about? It is not about races, they are different than human. You only see the surface of human beings (like skin colors, form of eye and so on) but scientists see what is inside. A neanderthal was not human.
Neanderthal were 99.5 percent human, not 100%. Human dna and chimpanzee is 96% identical. Chimpanzees are closer to monkeys but Neanderthal are more like human but not 100% human.
I don´t know about the newest dna research but I can tell you I have seen a new scientific documentary (a few months ago) scientists tell Neanderthal and human could not have children.
@buildyourself2010 Neanderthal was human just like bonobos are chimps. Simple logic. As long one specie has term Homo in its scientific name, then it's human. Needless to say some scientists actually consider them as a sub-specie of the wise man(Homo sapiens).
New scientific documentary? They have obsolete knowledge. If you're non-African you have chances of having up to 4% of Neanderthal DNA.
@GoodScienceForYou Subspecies(Homo Sapiens Sapiens, Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis) of the same specie(Homo Sapiens) or THE same specie with no subspecies? Even something like Brown bear and Polar bear can mate. Question how is it with fertile offspring And it appears they can produce it.
Race basically does not mean anything, it never did.
@SloveintzWend Race is a delusion. Just like Evolution. At some point the human species will start to split when the genetic, DNA starts to make breeding between separated people more and more difficult. It is far better NOW for our overall health as a species to mix as much as possible. The stronger DNA seems to come to the top when interbreeding. The more functional DNA seems to prevail but only from breeding with people who have the strength that fits the DNA weakness of opposite mate.
@GoodScienceForYou It does seem evolution is a delusion. Especially from a point of view of the human's nature. Human has domesticated himself, defied all laws of zoological, more specifically, primate behavior.
Mixing as much as possible, might have side effects like spreading genetic anomalies.
"Seems to come to the top"? Yeah that would be obvious if those genes were facing some selection. Otherwise there's just a random permutation. More material to permute less mistakes expressed.
@SloveintzWend We have a huge list of diseases that continue to kill, maim and attach the human genome on the germ level at the time of conception and after. This is because humans are compulsive and like to do things that increase diseases by feeding bacteria, virus, and fungus "food" that they adapt to. Once they adapt to eating human flesh by us teaching them, we basically have insured our extinction.
@SloveintzWend Seriously, you need to goto "GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum" and learn how we are basically destroying out species by some really stupid actions we do. Read the "Genetic Preservation and Objective Morality" threads.
@SloveintzWend@SloveintzWend The diseases do not go away, unless they are a virus that cannot find a host. Bactria can be dormant for "millions of years". The CDC has a list of the current living mutated diseases humans have created to help with their extinction. The list is incomplete, by the way, but it is pretty educational to realize we created all those diseases by not following the rule book for life.
Scientists now claim Neanderthals and Humans interbred outside Africa, therefore populations outside Africa have up to 4% Neanderthal DNA.
But didn’t scientists define species as the ability to interbreed and have fertile offspring? But it now turns out all along two different species could interbreed and produce fertile offspring?
Given the amazingly low genetic diversity humans have compared to the other living species of hominids it's definitely possible that Neanderthals were to us as bonobos are to chimps. Or even closer then that. Maybe their extinction event was more an assimilation into homo sapiens sapiens, but then maybe we'd have higher genetic diversity...hmm...interesting stuff to say the least!
Neanderthal caucasoids NEVER died out, their like a disease on the earth right now, because all the light/ whitskinned, mixed, non-black races are 100% Neanderthal caucasoid Edomites; the light-coppery- yellow / whiteskin and straight/ loose curly hair and caucasoid skull are specific features of the Neanderthal.
Even without fossils, DNA and gene analysis prove evolution better than fossils ever could or will. Evolution is supported by mountains of evidence. We have more evidence for evolution that we do, to say there is other planets in the solar system. And certainly more for it than invisible magic zombie sky daddies.
We don't need to continue with religious bullshit in science. We can discard all the crap pseudo sciences and then science will progress. Once the belief is fully lodged in the student they are fucked. They can no longer see anything but a projection of what they believe they see. This is human nature and ego. There is NOTHING in physical evidence to support evolution. If you have this absolutely irrefutable evidence then show it.
@GSFY "We don't need to continue with religious bullshit in science" Correct - so stop with the religious idiocy that claims the theory of evolution to be a religion; it is not, it's a part of the biological sciences.
"This is human nature and ego" Certainly the claptrap that you peddle is a result of your nature and ego. You are a narcissist and you invent lies about your accomplishments, your I.Q., your erudition, etc.
"There is NOTHING in physical evidence to support evolution" liar
@AlanCFA I work extremely well with very intelligent people. I don't do well with low IQ Evotards and morons, such as you, ALAn if that is your name. I think it is Andy.
@gregrutz Anyone who is an Evotard and thinks they are smart, cannot understand my videos, because you listen with Evotard ears and watch with Evotard Glasses over your mind. You basically have no control over your mind when you allow others to own you. Needing to belong to some stupid, Evodelusionism, religion is not a good human characteristic.
@GoodScienceForYou "I work extremely well with very intelligent people" No, there are several extremely intelligent people who have engaged you on YouTube and you have done nothing but insult them. Is that your idea of working "extremely well" with them? Please, show us a comment in the over two years you have been here that shows how well you work with someone. Identify someone with whom you have worked well on YouTube by name; since you claim to have a photographic memory, it should be easy
@AlanCFA Anyone who believes that anything has ever evolved is not intelligent. They are retarded from belief.
This is because there is NO evidence in the real world that even suggests that evolution is possible. The only evidence we have is degradation of ALL creatures to more limited and weaker species.
@AlanCFA It is pretty funny, because I don't like most religions, because they are so far off from anything that looks like what is real and I really hate religious bullshit in the science classroom. That is why this Evodelusionism bullshit needs to be removed from all classrooms. All religious bullshit that has nothing shown in evidence, needs to be removed from any classroom, unless you are teaching it as religion. Evodelusionism is not science. It is a mythological bullshit religion.
@AlanCFA Are you THAT STUPID! Answer yes AlanCFA is that stupid. Arguing creationism verse Evodelusionism is not an argument. I told my brother that he needs to find god, because it is the only thing that is PROVEN to work for drug addicts. Instead he chose to take more drugs. Most people cannot escape drug addiction by taking prescription drugs and so they become "Chemical Zombies". Seeking the truth has nothing do to with religion nor with "theory".
@GSFY "Arguing creationism verse Evodelusionism is not an argument" correct and I have agreed with you every time you have made that statement. But you ARE a creationist, your arguments are all creationist (except the humans mating or giving birth to apes part), and you did write that YOU, not John, believe in God. Period. You wrote that and you meant it and don't give me God = Truth, you believe in Yahweh.
You do NOT seek the truth - you tell constant lies.
@AlanCFA I told you that my God = Truth. If you are not seeking the truth, then you are only seeking to perpetuate the bullshit that you believe. Humans are emotionally driven to believe out of fear and weakness.
You came from a religious background, I did not. My parents never talked about god, never took me to church so I have no religion from any formative years. My dad did teach me to never believe anyone. That is the best thing I can teach anyone. The need for God is innate in humans.
@GoodScienceForYou "I told you that my God = Truth" Yes you have and I do not believe you. IF that were true, then you would be an atheist and you have said that you are not.
Nobody is going to write "... I believe in God..." as YOU did if they do not believe in God, but in "truth". Nobody who tells as many lies as you can say that "God = Truth".
@AlanCFA Once you have fucked up your life enough, and you suffer from it, most people start to question their self destructive paths. You are still on a path of self destruction. At some point you will either kill yourself or you will find God. You don't even know what truth is, because you hide behind a pile of ego bullshit. You have shit for lenses on your glasses. You like to eat morons shit they feed you, because you think it is smart.
You can easily go over to your page and see how you hate religions and you do all you can to attack them. That is sick. It is a mental illness, because there is no way for you to verify your beliefs. You use your disgusting Evodelusionism religion as a crutch to find a release for your hate.
And you betray your family, and degrade them with this. It is far better to not be so hateful. Hate destroys the hater.
@GoodScienceForYou "You can easily go over to your page and see how you hate religions and you do all you can to attack them" I battle creotards like you, not religions.
The Neanderthal skull shown in this video is really long! And the nasal appertures are really large! I would love to see it fleshed out by an expert, to know what it looked like!
millichocs 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1 of X This idea of human evolving from fish is the delusion of Evolution. Evolution is not science, that is where you are mistaken. It is a myth that gives hope for humans that they are evolving.
When the facts are opposite. There are way more than 4600 genetic defects in humans causing disease. There are 4 "positive" mutations that are not verifiable but one. That is the Truth. It is up to you to find your own truth. Objective awareness requires a special mind, trained to not believe.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2 of X You need to understand the power of suggestion and faith. The TV is filled with this religious crap on evolution. The minds of children are weak and easy to mold into conformity. They only want to survive and to conform to the culture. Children are not about seeking the truth, but about being molded into conforming. This is why there are 320 million jihadists who want to kill. There are no "good" forms of indoctrination. All that brings false faith and belief is the problem.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 of X Evolution is a religion; Without any doubts. In the last 20 years we have been gathering the data from DNA that only shows genetic losses from mutations in all complex creatures. That is absolute, can't be refuted, obvious, beyond anyone's ability to change by faith and belief. It took nearly 150 years after the evidence showing the earth was not flat, before the paid scientist believers all died out. That is the nature of faith belief and indoctrination.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4 of X We know for a fact that there is no biological mechanism shown in any DNA other than genetic loss. 100% of the people on earth have genetic diseases and we are gaining more new diseases constantly.
1 in 12 in the US have diabetes. 1 in 8 women get breast cancer. There are so many diseases from mutations, yet some weak people want to believe in evolution.
Why don't you know this? Who is keeping this from you? Why do they believe in and teach religious nonsense being taught as "science"?
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5 of X "How will we live with each other?" The way we have lived with belief systems and ideology forever, by killing each other in the name of "good". Evolution kills us in the name of ignorance. Avoiding the reality of genetic degradation is not going to promote health. There is nothing that humans can do against their own delusions and ignorance they perpetuate in the name of "being good". Only God can fix this. There is your answer. The Truth will set you free. Stop believing humans.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
6 of X Maybe you need to get free from the control you give to human faith and beliefs. For the most part all that you have faith and belief in, is not real. There may be 5% truth in it, the rest is the mental modulations of what your emotions do to you. People want to believe their parents, teachers, etc and there is the perfect scenario of blind teaching the blind out of goodness.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
7 of X • If you really want the Truth, then you will find it. If all you want to do is perpetuate, yours and others beliefs, then that is what you will get. There are many paths towards freedom, but very few actually want it. Organic compulsions, ego, and needs, are the driving force of ignorance.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
8 of X If you can find any interpretation of evidence for evolution that is NOT tainted with belief, then you are not a scientist. A real scientist is objective and has no beliefs.
So, far the "elephant in the room" in all papers on this pseudo science is this faith and belief that evolution must be true, but that is all I have read in the 28,000 papers on evolution and biology. Using the word "evolution" hundreds of billions of times does not make it real.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou How many sock accounts do you have now? It looks like at least 10 since nobody else if thumbing up your comments. You are pathetic in that you have to try and vote your comments up and they are nothing but spam.
AlanCFA 2 months ago
We have two kind of people: the FIRST doesn't believe in "Out of Africa" for being racist and white-nationalist. They also think the brain size is important even if woman have more gray matter but got less Nobel Prizes.
The SECOND, doesn't believe in "Out of Africa" for being a religious man and swear we came from Adam. They also think the brain size is important even if atheists have larger brains than they have.
SAD
IFoundMyUsername 2 months ago 3
@IFoundMyUsername
you sound just as judgmental as the second group you make assumptions about and antagonize. if you wish to challenge someone else's view point, ad hominem is not an intelligent way to do so. you're making a moral issue out of a scientific question. recent evidence for instance shows that both neanderthals and the newly discovered denisova hominid both contributed to the gene pool of modern humans, which goes against a strict interpretation of the Out of Africa theory.
raigekimaru 2 months ago
The new theory (May 2010) is that African humans hybridized with Neanderthals and produced Eurasian humans (1 to 4 % NM).
The flaw in the theory is that NM had more ape-like DNA in mtDNA and nuclear, which does not show in Eurasians. Also Eurasians have X-chromosome match to NM, not Africans.
The answer is that NM was final product of human hybridization with apes. NM was result of human male with Eurasian DNA mating with female homo-whatever, probably Denisovans, exterminated by massive flood
Mdebacle 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mdebacle Neanderthals were human. This is now obvious from the evidence. You cannot breed with any species other than your own.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou "Neanderthals were human. This is now obvious from the evidence. You cannot breed with any species other than your own."
Wow! You are the IDIOT who claimed:
Here is another of his gems:
"My hypothesis on this.
1) Human and Gorilla mated and produce the chimp.
2) The Gorilla and chimp produces the Orangutan.
3) The Chimp and Human produced the Neanderthals"
So, you now believe that chimps and humans are the same species? Or that humans and gorillas are the same species?
AlanCFA 2 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlanCFA That hypothesis was not far off. Not one single geneticists could disprove it. That is because we are related to the chimp and the gorilla and the ancients were far closer than now. The mDNA of the Neanderthal is said to be more "chimp like". Do you know any of this?
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou "Not one single geneticists could disprove it. " Name one who tried. You cannot. Your hypothesis is refuted by your OWN writings. You now write "You cannot breed with any species other than your own" which contradicts your earlier writing.
You now claim that Neanderthals were human and previously claimed that humans mated with chimps to produce them. You are so desperate to protect your religious beliefs that you make up crap constantly.
AlanCFA 2 months ago
MegaCaracolillo 3 months ago
Neanderthal=Edomites
trusoule 3 months ago
@trusoule
And basques,and frenchs,and germans...
Neanderthal is the ancestor of white people.
THE ARTIC MONKEY.
WE
MegaCaracolillo 3 months ago
Cro Magnons had larger brains than modern humans.
SuzLa1 4 months ago
@SuzLa1 You mean Neanderthal. Modern humans are Cro Magnon.
1484Kenji 4 months ago
Well, the DNA shows that they were another hominid species even if they looked somewhat similar to us.
winterstellar 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry to see you've been visited by that creationist loon Mr. GoodScienceForYou and his myriad of sock accounts(so he can vote up his own stupid comments) - but then he has such a sad life it's apparently his only real pleasure these days. When he claimed that humans had mated with gorillas to produce chimps and orang-utans I almost pissed myself laughing!
60msd 5 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@60msd "Sorry to see you've been visited by that creationist loon Mr. GoodScienceForYou ..."
He's a loon alright! Check this out:
watch?v=K9m3f0RdGBs
AlanCFA 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlanCFA It is amazing that you are this stupid. I gave you all the information you need to get free from all religious crap, yet you cling to this religious human garbage belief. I do have empathy for you, but you choose death over life. With your mind, I can understand, that life is not a good thing for you, because ignorance is the ultimate cause of suffering.
GoodScienceForYou 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou "It is amazing that you are this stupid. I gave you all the information you need to get free from all religious crap,..." you keep repeating that stupid phrase. There is lots of evidence for evolution, none for creation. You are the religious fanatic partaking in cults like Jehovah's Witnesses and Siddha Yoga.
You have NEVER studied the theory of evolution, you do NOT have an IQ of 180, and you ARE a liar.
AlanCFA 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolution: "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.
This has never been seen in any biological specimins. There are no one cell creatures that magically became complex. There is no evolution on this planet.
DNA is absolutely irrefutable on this.
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
wtf, I fought neanderfalls was still alive today with us. I fink they are called niggers.
ti3nt 6 months ago
@ti3nt ....I guess it takes one to know one because your ass is a neanderthal offspring. all non sub-saharan africans have 1-9% neanderthal dna. that means you #igger. :)
butifuldrm 6 months ago
Whales have larger brains than humans. Brain size is not a factror of intelligence.
Moronvideos1940 6 months ago
@Moronvideos1940 You have to look at the brain size relative to the size of the animal. You also have to look at the amount of grey matter. To flat out deny that brain size has no correlation with intelligence is beyond retarded.
return135 6 months ago 2
Comment removed
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
o no, not carbon dating deniers!
mboundtogether 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.EVITCUDORP EB DNA EVIL OT LLIW YM NAHT RETAERG GNITTEG SI NOISSERPPO S'ELPOEP KCALB EHT
?ECITSUJ ROF PU SDNATS DNA TUO SEIRRAC YLLAUTCA OHW YRUJ EHT NO NOSREP NAISA RO ETIHW YNA NO SEMAN EKAT LLIW YRUJ A NO ELPOEP KCALB YNA NAEM TAHT SEOD OS
billslusser 8 months ago
Isnt this video a little out of date? And hasnt it become clear that modern Europeans have neanderthal dna? In fact everyone has but Africans? If true this means that there was interbreeding and that we are the result. And wouldnt it be right that if interbreeding took place and produced fertile offspring then by definition Neanderthals now need to be considered as "human"?
CobinRain 8 months ago
Neanderthals might have been even more Intelligent than our early ancestors since their brains were larger.. I think the reason we succeeded it's because we were very social and liked to work in team.. Unlike the Neanderthals, they were only living in small groups..and that really does not help when you are in competition ..but then again I might be wrong..what do we really now anyway..it's a long time ago..I do believe in the interbreeding of cro-magnon and the neanderthal
EuropeanGuy87 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EuropeanGuy87 The "Herto" is a predecessor of modern humans and had a much larger brain capacity. Because in DNA we ONLY see a genetic degradation from extremely fit to now over 4500 known genetic diseases shown in DNA mutations, you can easily understand that we have only de-evolved by our bad habits of destroying our genome. Neanderthal, is most likely a human offshoot, or race not a different species. If we bred with them, they are/were the same species by definition.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou dude you are INSANE!!!!
That's all I got to say!! Yeah ofcourse they will rather attribute great civilizations like Egypt to alians although it's in AFRICA.
That's what they said about the ISHANGO BONE which dates back to 25,000 years ago.
It was only 50 years later they confirmed it was Africans using the mathematical knowledge.
No thank you sir I don't buy any of this GARBAGE.
dogons2k12 6 months ago 3
Clone some and see how they handle language, learning, etc.
newguy33X 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When people are confronted with absolute evidence against any form of "evolution" then they start repeating religious slogans as if they were real.
"Evolution comes from natural selection, not from DNA". What sort of a moron would say shit like that? Brainwashing is a horrible thing and weak minds.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago 22
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou It's amazing just how many words you write without saying anything. You call people various names and then don't explain what you're talking about. Instead of saying "you're stupid" why don't actually explain yourself?
simchamo 9 months ago
@simchamo It helps if you understand English.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou Implying I don't understand english is ridiculous because I am in fact clearly writing in fluent English. That makes your statement an Ad Hominem attack which tells me that you have nothing to say and are trying to redirect attention. Do you really have that little to add to the conversation? All I am asking for is an explanation. Why are you so obsessed with mutations? just answer that one easy little question. Forget the other questions. Just answer that one.
simchamo 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@simchamo It would be good for you if you took some time to go to google it: "Neutral Evolution Forum" and learn what is going on. You don't seem to be able to comprehend simple scientific data. If over 70% of the mutations which the Evotards say cause evolution are bad, deleterious, and 1% might be positive, then that is 70 to 1 against any form of net positive evolution. We have over 4500 cataloged genetic defects in the human species. That is impossible if evolution were true.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago 20
@GoodScienceForYou
" If over 70% of the mutations which the Evotards say cause evolution are bad..."
How many times do I need to say this? Evolutionary theory does not claim mutations causes evolution. Mutations don't cause evolution. Mutations don't cause evolution. Evolution and mutation are two different things, they aren't the same, they are not equivalent. they are different. The two are not the same.Etc etc...
P.S. Calling people who support the theory "evotards" is seriously petty.
simchamo 9 months ago
@simchamo You can say crap all day long, but if it doesn't fit the evidence then you are insane, retarded. and a waste of time.
Maybe you have not studied this theory of evolution like I have off and on for the last 43 years. There is no evolution,There is no evolution. There is only a series of overwhelming deleterious mutations, over 4500 so far, that are degenerating the human genome.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou Clearly you haven't studied evolution for the past 43 years; you have studied deleterious genomic mutations. So again. I'll keep on trying to explain this. 70% of mutations are deleterious. Thats fine. I have no quarrel with that. but mutations have little to nothing to do with evolution. evolution is simply changes in POPULATION over time, not changes in an individual over time. Deleterious mutations cause fitness to decrease which is why we are not a sick population.
simchamo 9 months ago
@simchamo You are under the illusion that we are not a sick population. Over 50% of adults in the US are taking medicines for mental illness. We force feed amphetamines to children to help them to learn, because their minds wander all the time and have no concentration. 1 in 3 people will die from cancer. Our life times are shortened by diseases and genetic defects. The only thing that keeps us going is artificial means, heart surgery, artificial joints, and drugs with severe side effects.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou The overall IQ of people is going down, especially in affluent societies with bad foods, and bad drugs, bad lifestyles. The USA is number 28 in science and is going down in intelligence. Radiation from all forms is destroying brain cells along with chemicals in foods, and you think we are better off.
The delusion of evolution is this magical bullshit that has never happened. There are no magical mutations that fix degeneration and genetic degradation.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou
Science? I don't think so! Actually, IQs are far higher than they were a hundred years ago. The demands of the environment (using computers, mobile phones, etc) means that we are just getting brighter and brighter.
alan111best 9 months ago
@alan111best "Actually, IQs are far higher than they were a hundred years ago." = ridiculous statement.
There's no way for you to even make a statement like that. We know that 50% of the adults in the USA are on drugs for mental problems. We know that people are strapping on bombs and blowing themselves up. We have more wars going on all the time. We have tremendous poverty and people dying of starvation. We still hate one another over stupid ideologies and you think we are smarter?
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@alan111best The Herto had a larger brain capacity that modern humans. The only thing that saves us is the fact that we have not used the full potential of the human brain which is losing its fitness from every generation to the next. The capacity for knowledge has been in the human mind since the beginning.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou mental illness, with the exception of suicidal behavior, has nothing to do with mortality/overall population health. it certainly has very little to do with the human genome. 1 in 3 people diagnosed with cancer dies from it, but in 2009 one fifth of one percent of the american population died of cancer. Rates of cancer death is directly correlated with age. the older you are the more likely you are to die of cancer. Look at cancer rates among reproducing adults. Way less.
simchamo 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou Furthermore, You can't only look at human population when talking about evolution. Is the general global biology substantially healthier or sicker than it has been in the past 600 million years? No. Some go extinct, some thrive.
simchamo 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou
50% of people are not mentally ill! Again, facts?????
No, many people take pills for anxiety and so on - that just shows how good the drug companies are at selling their junk.
1 in 3 die from cancer because we live so long - we have never had such a huge life expectancy - cancer affects some younger people but it is mainly the effect of old age. The longer we live the more of us will die from illness rather than accident, etc. We have to die of something!
alan111best 9 months ago
@alan111best "50% of people are not mentally ill! Again, facts?????" In order to get medications for mental illness you have to be diagnosed as mentally ill. DUH! I know one psychiatrist who actually thinks "we need to put Prozac in the water supply". This is exactly what she said to me. According to her 100% of humans are mentally ill. It is because humans block the truth and prefer fairy tales and we have no clue how we screw up our own mind with HEMG from human garbage beliefs.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@alan111best "We have to die of something!" If the human genome was brought back to its condition of perfection then we would not degrade and die from "old age". There would be no "old age". Scientists have no reasons for old age. They see the degeneration but they don't have a clue why the cells don't continue to replicate perfectly forever. Death is just accepted as if it was an absolute truth. If we did not have the 4500+ genetic defects, we would live a LOOONNNGG time.
GoodScienceForYou 9 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou are you a creationist ? i mean one of those guys who think species magically appeared at the will of a deity ?... and the Earth is 7000 years old ? can you answer me to those questions so i can see where you stand ? cause when you're dismissing evidence based science then you must have an alternative way on how to understand reality.
wedingo 8 months ago
@wedingo 1o2 The Earth is not 6 or 7K years old an it is also not 4.7 billion years. This is because the methods used are flawed, utterly flawed. The only way to determine the age of the universe is by continual interpolation of data from observation in space. There is no way to know the decay rate of materials from billions of years ago.
We know from particle physics that matter gains in density when it accelerates and is sped up. The universe is constantly accelerating matter is more dense.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou The earth is 4,545 Million years old, the univers is 13.7 Billion years old.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz The age of the earth and the universe is totally not verifiable by any standard calibration methods. There is no way to verify assumptions based on faith belief and tiny minded ideas.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou Just because you can't figure it out does not mean scientists don't know.
gregrutz 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz 1 of 2 Do you understand the word "assumptions", "belief", "ideology". There is NO WAY to verify that radiometric dating is accurate at all. It is base solely on assumptions that radioactive matter has always decayed at the same rate. We know for a fact that time is accelerating. Speeding up and matter is more dense as the universe expands and accelerates. Black holes are extremely dense matter travelling faster than the speed of light from our relative perspective.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago 10
@GoodScienceForYou actually, didnt the radio carbon dating of absolute year-dated tree rings of demonstrable age and contextually dated wooden objects in Egypt and elsewhere provide some confidence that c-14 dating works? Convinced me. The context here is that we have surviving organic matter which is already dated in some other way to provide a check. Like the dynastic sequences in Egypt. Actually recorded in writing. The objects match(more or less)their c-14 dates
CobinRain 8 months ago
@CobinRain C-14 is not used on replacement fossils, and C-14 dating is problematic in that contamination from air carrying organisms will screw up this concept. 10,000 years of maybe possible calibration is not good enough for 4.7 billion years of projection. That is like looking at a 47 mile long road in complete darkness with a flashlight that only shines 6 inches. It is human emotional mental garbage. /watch?v=JntCa6FssRQ
/watch?v=8s2U7EsJ1QQ
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou Archaeologists are aware of the shortcomings of C-14 dating but find it a useful tool back to about 80,000 BC. The contamination you speak of can occur but no one puts much faith in a single date and so it is clusters of dates associated with artifacts, toolkits etc that give confidence. And you appear to misunderstand the concept when you say C-14 is not iused on "replacement fossils". Of course not. Only organic material.
CobinRain 8 months ago
@CobinRain I understand this better than anyone. I know all of the flaws in this system and have made presentations on them. The Radiometric dating is nothing more than a lot of assumptions on replacement fossils. Once the chemicals replace the bones they cannot be dated at all. Click on the video supplied in the "Video Responses" and listen and read carefully so you understand the utter logical fallacy of dating replacement fossils.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou You do not "understand this better than anyone". You are very exercised to explain to others that you cant date fossils. But you are only say ing this because you do not understand the basic principles of archaeology--concepts of assemblage, stratigraphy and association. For example: the fossilised early homo bones and associated tools in the Rift Valley were dated by using Potassium Argon dating to date the lava layers that sandwiched the fossiliferous layer.
CobinRain 8 months ago
@CobinRain 1 of 2 Go to the videos as I suggested. Since there is ONLY genetic degradation shown in DNA evidence and all evidence of ALL multicellular creatures, you need to realize that this dating is utterly worthless.
It is far more likely that the "hominids" are human species that were degraded by radioactive water or food supply. They mutated (degenerated) rapidly from the radiation. That is why Chimps for instance show only signs of being de-evolved from a superior human.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@CobinRain 2 of 2 Since chimps and humans are "Cousins" and there is ONLY degradation shown in all the DNA samples, then there is no evolution. It is obvious from ALL the evidence.
The radiometric dating is dating the radiation that caused the degeneration. In places near volcanoes is a lot of radioactive matter. The Macaque monkey in Japan is a perfect example of extremely degraded humans from radiation in volcanic "hot springs". I posted the evidence "Neutral Evolution Forum".
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@CobinRain You see, in real science we go with the absolutely irrefutable evidence first. Then see where the rest of the evidence fits. All the hominids are most likely degenerated to the point of extinction, humans who simply were too scientifically illiterate to know not to drink radioactive water or soak in radioactive hot springs.
DNA ONLY shows degeneration from a much more fit superior human creature. DNA cannot be argued with. Fairy tales of "evolution" is mythology with no evidence.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The reason why there are no trails of evolution is because they are obviously trails of hominid extinction from genetic degradation. This fits perfectly with the absolutely irrefutable physical evidence of DNA.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@CobinRain When the fossils only show extinction, then there must be a scientific reason for that. They simply stopped living when they became so degraded genetically they could not live. Humans are heading in the same direction. We have over 4500 genetic defects that are recognized as diseases. Then there are other genetic degradations that simply have caused weaknesses and less muscle strength. Chimps are over two times stronger muscles than humans. They retained that cell replication.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou " When the fossils only show extinction, then there must be a scientific reason for that. They simply stopped living when they became so degraded genetically they could not live "
Please provide evidence for this claim.
wowamonn 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wowamonn The evidence in in the DNA of all creatures. There is ONLY genetic degradation shown in ALL DNA evidence. If you don't know this you are not a scientist. The trails of all the "hominids" is a dead end with extinction. Go look at my videos. It is clear as can be.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wowamonn You see, in real science we go with the absolutely irrefutable evidence first. Then see where the rest of the evidence fits. All the hominids are most likely degenerated to the point of extinction, humans who simply were too scientifically illiterate to know not to drink radioactive water or soak in radioactive hot springs.
DNA ONLY shows degeneration from a much more fit superior human creature. DNA cannot be argued with. Fairy tales of "evolution" is mythology with no evidence.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz 2 of 2 In particle physics known; when matter is accelerated it gains mass. Since the entire universe is accelerating, & gaining in mass, then the rate of decay cannot possible be the same a long long time ago. When you're standing on a tiny speck if time & space you think that is all there is. Only morons do not have the capacity to integrated up to 1000 scientific facts as I do. This is why there is pure lead on this earth with no U in site. Much more rapid decay of U in the past.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@wedingo 2o2 Since we know that molecules, atoms are much more dense now than in the past, then the decay rate of uranium and other radioactive isotopes has changed over time. It decayed much faster in ancient times. The "attraction" of matter has become stronger, so decay rates are much slower now.
There is pure lead on this earth. It ONLY comes from the total decay of Uranium. So that is impossible if decay rates are always the same.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
Comment removed
wedingo 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou'' atoms are much more dense now than in the past, ''
BULLSHIT !
You are making crap up.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@wedingo Humans and all creatures were made, by some phenomenal intelligent "Genetic Engineer". This is known because there is ONLY genetic degradation shown in all DNA from the living ancestors to the speciated descendants. Humans have over 4500 genetic defects. That is impossible if "evolution" were true. No humans are getting better or more intelligent, there is only the opposite in actual irrefutable physical evidence in DNA.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou 4500 genetic defects, yet we survive and reproduce. You mean not only we don't evolve, but we are only getting worse ? I could agree to that since we don't obey the natural selection rule anymore, we can reproduce regardless of our level of physical fitness or intellect. But what about the rest of the animals ? If "genetic engineering" created all the animals, then it also released them in the perfect habitat for them to survive, or otherwise it doesn't make sense, right ?
wedingo 8 months ago
@wedingo Go look at the rest of the animals. They have all reduced fitness from the ancient versions. In the groups of creatures where we have the oldest still surviving and not de-evolving to much, like the Gecko which is 100 MYO by the dumb ass radiometric dating system, it descendants are all less complex. The Gecko is the parent of even snakes that have lost legs. Original habitat has changed obviously and millions are extinct, from genetic degradation and lack of fitness to survive.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou You have no idea how evolution works !
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz Evolution does not work. Evolution: "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.
This has never happened in biology. There is only constant degeneration from much more fit, and much more complex creatures shown in ALL evidence.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@wedingo Humans are heading for extinction, by the way. We continue to do the things that destroy our genomes; culturing all sorts of virus, microorganisms, that will attack at the germ level during reproduction mutating the human egg and sperm; where the heavy duty mutations occur, from poor sexual conduct. Many sex partners and many cultured new virus and bacteria in the sexual parts in human body. There is a rule book that tells us how to have sex for preservation of the human species.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou a rule book for having sex ? what the hell are you talking about ? How does sexual conduct influence the altering of genome ?
Of course humans are heading for extinction sooner or later, that is a genuine truth that applies to every specie that ever lived. We're on a planet orbiting around a star with limited lifespan, and there are also lots of other disaster possibilities that can end life instantly or gradually. But i'm sure we're not gonna wipe cause of having wrong sex .
wedingo 8 months ago
@wedingo Genetic mutations in the female at the time of conception is particularly bad, It comes from virus, fungus, bacteria that attacks the egg and sperm. This is the worst form of genetic mutation there is and it is permanent. It is the ERV's in action which screw up the smooth flow of information. Please, goto "Neutral Evolution Forum" and read the threads with "Objective Morality". There are two of them. I list all the mutated diseases (CDC) we have made from incorrect sexual contact.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@wedingo This is why it is recommended if you are going to reproduce or have the slightest possibly of pregnancy with a mate that you 1/ Be completely loyal sexually to them. 2/ Be checked out for any STDs. and clean of all of them before you try to have children 3/ Don't risk any microbes by having anal sex and putting the male organ directly into the female after anal penetration. That can cause horrible mutations in the egg and sperm. If you want the best possible fetus then that is it.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@wedingo Also, you may want to see if you or your mate carry any genetic defects that when combined have a high chance of passing on genetic diseases to the child. It is best if you mate with someone of different genetic lineage altogether so that the defects may be removed in the offspring. This is the only way at the present time of watering down bad genes and making them go away. This is why sickle cell anemia has been reduced drastically in African Americans who are mixed with other races
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@wedingo Check out Potholder54's videos on crockoduck award nominations and you will see the story behind this clown. He is the definition of mental illness. You are not going to be able to reason with him.
stromatolite775 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou = '' Brainwashing is a horrible thing and weak minds.''
No shit, you do understand something. Religous people will listen to anything the supports their bible. You were talking about creationists, right?
gregrutz 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou Darwin would ''say shit like that''. He even wrote it down, In a book called ''Origin of species by means of Natural Selection.''
gregrutz 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz 'Origin of species by means of Natural Selection.'' I a speculative pile of retarded ideas that were never shown in evidence.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
The classification Neandethal has been debated for a while now and there are physical anthropologists who are sympathetic to reclassifying Neanderthal as a subspecies of homo sapiens. Distinguishing characteristics are cranial capacity and other morphological features both cranial and post cranial (more pronounced brow ridge is one of the big ones) The Neanderthals did not use the same subsistence strategies as homo sapiens, they relied more heavily on meat and required more calories to function
simchamo 9 months ago
theyv probably made up all this shit about neanderthals, because they came up with this theory we all came from africa, and it doesnt jive.. if you think scientists tell the truth about everything, youre part of the majority of brainwashed sheep that believe anything your authorities tell you, whether it be government, science or religion...youre all being led around like cattle.. go ahead and pretend youre smart
longfootbuddy 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@longfootbuddy They recently found 400,000 to 500,000 year old MODERN human teeth fossilized in Israel.
That destroys this idea of coming from Africa. People moved to Africa from the Middle east.
Keep in mind that Radiometric dating is extremely worthless. /watch?v=JntCa6FssRQ
Also; /watch?v=8s2U7EsJ1QQ
Goto "GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum" and learn about real objective science.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago 12
@GoodScienceForYou keep dreaming
LMAOF
dogons2k12 6 months ago 3
@dogons2k12 I don't live in a fantasy world. I am not afraid of the truth as you are. It is far better to be ignorant for dumb people, as yourself. Only stupid people believe in the magical evolution fairy.
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou so what do you believe in exactly that modern man came from ISRAEL?!?!
So where did you get this PSEUDO SCIENCE from?!?! ZIONIST NEWS or FOX channel?!?
Which one is it?!?! LMAOF
dogons2k12 6 months ago 5
@dogons2k12 I suggest for your sake that you go listen to all my videos, and understand what real science is all about. I do my own research and seek my own truth. Others have done the same thing, and so can you. You do not have to conform to religious ideolgy of the Evotards. You can find out what is really going on for yourself, if you have any intelligence and are not just a weak willed sheep of social human garbage that has been shoved into your brain.
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dogons2k12 What I know is that the real "family" of mankinds parent of the genetic species is not tracible. Where man was first on this planet has not been found. The Herto, the MCFA of female and male, the ancestors of both the Neanderthaler and the humans is unknown. But by genetic science we know that in order to breed, they must have the same genetics and are from the same genetic lineage. There is only genetic degradation and losses with time.
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
@dogons2k12 watch?v=omm8Ey8vwbg&NR=1&feature=fvwp
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
@dogons2k12 LOL
trinitodbone4 1 month ago
@GoodScienceForYou you are nothing but an INTERBRED INDIAN ALBINO who fled to colder regions towards Europe. When you arrived in Europe you met the Khoisan man who was already in Europe.
Your history starts at 800 BC remains dormant after the fall of ROME and picks back up after the defeat of BLACK MUSLIMS who colonized Europe for almost 800 years.
watch?v=OjBlZl8RON8
THAT is a FACT. Deal with it.
dogons2k12 6 months ago 3
@dogons2k12 This has nothing to do with the entire premise of evolution. There is no evolution there is only a constant genetic loss as time goes on. There is no such thing as any "net positive" improvements because DNA studies destroy that idea. All creatures of prior generations were more fit and have gradually degraded.
Humans are degrading faster than ever, because of lifestyle and ignorance of science.
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dogons2k12 By the way your youtube page is not legible. You don't understand about simple use of graphics, makes you seem stupid.
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
@dogons2k12 wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dogons2k12 wiki/Y-chromosomal_Adam
Once you realize that this whole religion of Evodelusionism is split up in lots of belief systems, it becomes clear that it is a religious ideolgy. Hint; radiometric dating is utter bullshit.
The only physical evidence we have ONLY shows genetic degradation as the absolute clear, irrefutable evidence. Therefore there is no such thing as evolution of simple life to complex life.
GoodScienceForYou 6 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou I never once believed the 'Out of Africa' theory, not once, the reason this 'Out of Africa' idea came was simply because they found a skeleton set there that pre-dated every other skeleton or bone set in the world.
It seems the myth remained however by either PC Marxist types and those trying to use it as a weapon against racism.
We now know that everybody else in the world, particularly Europe, has a small but significant percentage of Neanderthal in them apart from Africa.
segano1 5 months ago
the neanderthal IS human. its a different human race. there is also otthetr races that vanished like the mini. and people of add. they were giants. it doesnt mean u should support darwin. its jus RACES
unspokentopics 10 months ago
@unspokentopics
Human races are all human beings from one root, they can have sex and get children but if a neanderthal had sex with human they could not get children. If a monkey have sex with a human they will not get children. Why you say something you don't know about? It is not about races, they are different than human. You only see the surface of human beings (like skin colors, form of eye and so on) but scientists see what is inside. A neanderthal was not human.
buildyourself2010 10 months ago
@buildyourself2010 Oh, but according to latest DNA research Neanderthals and modern humans could have children.
Neanderthal was human, a different specie of human however.
SloveintzWend 10 months ago
@SloveintzWend
Neanderthal were 99.5 percent human, not 100%. Human dna and chimpanzee is 96% identical. Chimpanzees are closer to monkeys but Neanderthal are more like human but not 100% human.
I don´t know about the newest dna research but I can tell you I have seen a new scientific documentary (a few months ago) scientists tell Neanderthal and human could not have children.
buildyourself2010 10 months ago
@buildyourself2010 Neanderthal was human just like bonobos are chimps. Simple logic. As long one specie has term Homo in its scientific name, then it's human. Needless to say some scientists actually consider them as a sub-specie of the wise man(Homo sapiens).
New scientific documentary? They have obsolete knowledge. If you're non-African you have chances of having up to 4% of Neanderthal DNA.
watch?v=HpQiBPdFtog&feature=related
SloveintzWend 10 months ago
@SloveintzWend By definition they were the same species or we could not have mated with them. They are more likely a different human race.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou Subspecies(Homo Sapiens Sapiens, Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis) of the same specie(Homo Sapiens) or THE same specie with no subspecies? Even something like Brown bear and Polar bear can mate. Question how is it with fertile offspring And it appears they can produce it.
Race basically does not mean anything, it never did.
SloveintzWend 8 months ago
@SloveintzWend Here is the story.
/watch?v=spuZtAa80qI
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@SloveintzWend Race is a delusion. Just like Evolution. At some point the human species will start to split when the genetic, DNA starts to make breeding between separated people more and more difficult. It is far better NOW for our overall health as a species to mix as much as possible. The stronger DNA seems to come to the top when interbreeding. The more functional DNA seems to prevail but only from breeding with people who have the strength that fits the DNA weakness of opposite mate.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou It does seem evolution is a delusion. Especially from a point of view of the human's nature. Human has domesticated himself, defied all laws of zoological, more specifically, primate behavior.
Mixing as much as possible, might have side effects like spreading genetic anomalies.
"Seems to come to the top"? Yeah that would be obvious if those genes were facing some selection. Otherwise there's just a random permutation. More material to permute less mistakes expressed.
SloveintzWend 8 months ago
@SloveintzWend It has already been shown that sickle cell anemia is dwindling in the mixed race in the USA.
And the mixed race athletes are the strongest.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@GoodScienceForYou So such kind of diseases were totally eradicated or only delayed?
SloveintzWend 8 months ago
@SloveintzWend We have a huge list of diseases that continue to kill, maim and attach the human genome on the germ level at the time of conception and after. This is because humans are compulsive and like to do things that increase diseases by feeding bacteria, virus, and fungus "food" that they adapt to. Once they adapt to eating human flesh by us teaching them, we basically have insured our extinction.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@SloveintzWend Seriously, you need to goto "GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum" and learn how we are basically destroying out species by some really stupid actions we do. Read the "Genetic Preservation and Objective Morality" threads.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
@SloveintzWend @SloveintzWend The diseases do not go away, unless they are a virus that cannot find a host. Bactria can be dormant for "millions of years". The CDC has a list of the current living mutated diseases humans have created to help with their extinction. The list is incomplete, by the way, but it is pretty educational to realize we created all those diseases by not following the rule book for life.
GoodScienceForYou 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cryptozoology novel about two boys who find something strange on the beach one night see video book trailer
dltanner99 10 months ago
Scientists now claim Neanderthals and Humans interbred outside Africa, therefore populations outside Africa have up to 4% Neanderthal DNA.
But didn’t scientists define species as the ability to interbreed and have fertile offspring? But it now turns out all along two different species could interbreed and produce fertile offspring?
What is going on here???
NigNogPoIice 11 months ago
barry white a tenor ? funny stuff
juseph29 11 months ago
Given the amazingly low genetic diversity humans have compared to the other living species of hominids it's definitely possible that Neanderthals were to us as bonobos are to chimps. Or even closer then that. Maybe their extinction event was more an assimilation into homo sapiens sapiens, but then maybe we'd have higher genetic diversity...hmm...interesting stuff to say the least!
dookiecheez 1 year ago
Guys.. accept Horus are your savior or burn under the 3 great pyramids of egyp.
Santiagofigueroa2010 1 year ago
Neanderthal caucasoids NEVER died out, their like a disease on the earth right now, because all the light/ whitskinned, mixed, non-black races are 100% Neanderthal caucasoid Edomites; the light-coppery- yellow / whiteskin and straight/ loose curly hair and caucasoid skull are specific features of the Neanderthal.
july95211 1 year ago
@july95211
Way to be racist.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@july95211 If you're going to post on a science vid, it helps if you have the vaguest clue of what you're talking about.
comanchio1976 11 months ago
@july95211 Go crawl back into the cave you came out of and don't come out until you have evolved into a modern human.
PrimitiveByNature 10 months ago
@PrimitiveByNature ,You light/whiteskinned, mixed, non-black races are caucasoid Neanderthals , your NOT human at all.
july95211 10 months ago
@july95211 .....Says the racist piece of shit. Maybe when you grow up you can join the rest of us at the adult table.
PrimitiveByNature 10 months ago
@july95211 Channel not available. Gee what a fucking surprise. lmao Grow up kid and get a life.
PrimitiveByNature 10 months ago
@july95211
Well science has also proven that niggers are small brained low IQ apes ;)
However that is not a branch of science niggers are very interested in..
I wonder why.. :))) LOL
AlexGruev 10 months ago
Even without fossils, DNA and gene analysis prove evolution better than fossils ever could or will. Evolution is supported by mountains of evidence. We have more evidence for evolution that we do, to say there is other planets in the solar system. And certainly more for it than invisible magic zombie sky daddies.
SGTRandyB 1 year ago
The wallies that believe Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons did the deed are most likely Furries in their spare time. Sick sick sick!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We don't need to continue with religious bullshit in science. We can discard all the crap pseudo sciences and then science will progress. Once the belief is fully lodged in the student they are fucked. They can no longer see anything but a projection of what they believe they see. This is human nature and ego. There is NOTHING in physical evidence to support evolution. If you have this absolutely irrefutable evidence then show it.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
@GSFY "We don't need to continue with religious bullshit in science" Correct - so stop with the religious idiocy that claims the theory of evolution to be a religion; it is not, it's a part of the biological sciences.
"This is human nature and ego" Certainly the claptrap that you peddle is a result of your nature and ego. You are a narcissist and you invent lies about your accomplishments, your I.Q., your erudition, etc.
"There is NOTHING in physical evidence to support evolution" liar
AlanCFA 1 year ago 10
@GoodScienceForYou Real Science has the fossils dumb shit. They have the DNA showing how everything is related, IDiot.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Comment removed
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
@GoodScienceForYou "I was tested with an IQ over 180" Either that is a lie or the person who tested you was incompetent as you are not really bright.
" I don't work well with normal humans" Finally, after more than two years, you tell the truth about something!
AlanCFA 1 year ago 9
@AlanCFA I work extremely well with very intelligent people. I don't do well with low IQ Evotards and morons, such as you, ALAn if that is your name. I think it is Andy.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
@GoodScienceForYou Anyone who watches your videos knows you are not very smart.
gregrutz 1 year ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz Anyone who is an Evotard and thinks they are smart, cannot understand my videos, because you listen with Evotard ears and watch with Evotard Glasses over your mind. You basically have no control over your mind when you allow others to own you. Needing to belong to some stupid, Evodelusionism, religion is not a good human characteristic.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
@GoodScienceForYou "I work extremely well with very intelligent people" No, there are several extremely intelligent people who have engaged you on YouTube and you have done nothing but insult them. Is that your idea of working "extremely well" with them? Please, show us a comment in the over two years you have been here that shows how well you work with someone. Identify someone with whom you have worked well on YouTube by name; since you claim to have a photographic memory, it should be easy
AlanCFA 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlanCFA Anyone who believes that anything has ever evolved is not intelligent. They are retarded from belief.
This is because there is NO evidence in the real world that even suggests that evolution is possible. The only evidence we have is degradation of ALL creatures to more limited and weaker species.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
Even the oldest bacteria is shown to withstand high temperatures.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlanCFA It is pretty funny, because I don't like most religions, because they are so far off from anything that looks like what is real and I really hate religious bullshit in the science classroom. That is why this Evodelusionism bullshit needs to be removed from all classrooms. All religious bullshit that has nothing shown in evidence, needs to be removed from any classroom, unless you are teaching it as religion. Evodelusionism is not science. It is a mythological bullshit religion.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
@GoodScienceForYou "Evodelusionism is not science" Correct, but the theory of evolution IS science.
You are the religious one: "John thinks that because I believe in God that I am insane"
"...do spiritual things (call Jehovah's Witnesses for a bible study)"
"We are honest Christians who believe in God and believe in what is taught"
AlanCFA 1 year ago 8
@AlanCFA Are you THAT STUPID! Answer yes AlanCFA is that stupid. Arguing creationism verse Evodelusionism is not an argument. I told my brother that he needs to find god, because it is the only thing that is PROVEN to work for drug addicts. Instead he chose to take more drugs. Most people cannot escape drug addiction by taking prescription drugs and so they become "Chemical Zombies". Seeking the truth has nothing do to with religion nor with "theory".
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
@GSFY "Arguing creationism verse Evodelusionism is not an argument" correct and I have agreed with you every time you have made that statement. But you ARE a creationist, your arguments are all creationist (except the humans mating or giving birth to apes part), and you did write that YOU, not John, believe in God. Period. You wrote that and you meant it and don't give me God = Truth, you believe in Yahweh.
You do NOT seek the truth - you tell constant lies.
AlanCFA 1 year ago 7
@AlanCFA I told you that my God = Truth. If you are not seeking the truth, then you are only seeking to perpetuate the bullshit that you believe. Humans are emotionally driven to believe out of fear and weakness.
You came from a religious background, I did not. My parents never talked about god, never took me to church so I have no religion from any formative years. My dad did teach me to never believe anyone. That is the best thing I can teach anyone. The need for God is innate in humans.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou "I told you that my God = Truth" Yes you have and I do not believe you. IF that were true, then you would be an atheist and you have said that you are not.
Nobody is going to write "... I believe in God..." as YOU did if they do not believe in God, but in "truth". Nobody who tells as many lies as you can say that "God = Truth".
AlanCFA 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlanCFA Once you have fucked up your life enough, and you suffer from it, most people start to question their self destructive paths. You are still on a path of self destruction. At some point you will either kill yourself or you will find God. You don't even know what truth is, because you hide behind a pile of ego bullshit. You have shit for lenses on your glasses. You like to eat morons shit they feed you, because you think it is smart.
You obviously hate God and religions.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
You can easily go over to your page and see how you hate religions and you do all you can to attack them. That is sick. It is a mental illness, because there is no way for you to verify your beliefs. You use your disgusting Evodelusionism religion as a crutch to find a release for your hate.
And you betray your family, and degrade them with this. It is far better to not be so hateful. Hate destroys the hater.
GoodScienceForYou 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GoodScienceForYou "You can easily go over to your page and see how you hate religions and you do all you can to attack them" I battle creotards like you, not religions.
AlanCFA 1 year ago
@GoodScienceForYou