You can see more on this amazing plane from a display at the Farnborough International Airshow by searching for 'F-22 Raptor at Farnborough Airshow' here on YouTube. Yes, it may be the most advanced fighter plane in the world. I'm just glad we in the UK have the best pilots and are currently co-developing the best weapons in the world. If we had a bigger budget, we might be able to do better with planes too, but we'll leave that to the Americans for now... Æ
I love that this thing has a Gatling gun. Such a low probability of use on an aircraft supporting BVRM's and the enhanced AIM-9's, but still so necessary. Glad they learned from the F-4.
It's funny how the top comments are all about how the F-22 is the best plane ever. Too bad Schwartz, Mullen, and both Obama and McCain said otherwise.
@TATARSTAN59500 Actually, the AIM-9X is very comparable to, and better than, the AA-11 Archer (R-73) in all comparable statistics. With JHMCS, the seeker head can be slewed further than the Russian HMS, the Sidewinder has better IRCCM on the rail than the Archer and (in my opinion the big one) the American pilots have far more flight time and training in the WVR arena than Russian pilots.
@TATARSTAN59500 First, I would work on putting together an intelligent sentence if I were you. The ranges for both missiles are classified, and unless you have access to that information not sure how you can come up with comparisons. And, if you do have access to that type of intel, you would know that you are completely BS'ing yourself.
@TATARSTAN59500 Nope, I just tried to bring the facts to the table. You said that the 9X is crap compared to the 73, and its simply not true. Dont get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for the 73, and certainly hope I never see one in real life. I'm not putting anyone or anything down. Just stating facts.
@TATARSTAN59500 Dude, again. You really need to work on your ability to put a sentence together. I just plain cant understand what you are saying. As far as the Mig-35 goes, yes, it is pretty awesome airplane. However, how many are operational? Also, in today's air warfare, great maneuverability and power are only part of the equation. Long range missiles, stealth, radar and pilot aptitude are huge, and I would argue Russia does not dominate those categories.
@dwillpirate Agreed there. Very true. This guy is just slinging from the hip, anything and everything he can think of. Deep down he knows the F-22 is the BOSS. GO USAF.
@5xthejoy Think of? I'm stating nothing but facts here. The F-22 is a "boss" in the air when it's flying, too bad it rarely does because of it's flaws.
The F22 is overrated, lost vs RAF typhoons over China Lake where the typhoons locked on at long range. USAF claimed they where unstealthed and cancelled the 2 vs2 dogfight. Just proves the whole hype is all from military propaganda and another fail wouldh've been bad for the image.
Fact is the f22 has never seen real combat, is too reliant on sensors, "stealth" and other tech, heavy and slow to be of any use in todays combat enviroment.
@badInvention Oh yeah 70,000 lbs of thrust is slow. Get a grip. F-22 puts FEAR in the hearts of enemy fighter pilots. US Military "We are not looking for a fair fight". F-22 RAPTOR nuff said. GO USAF.
@5xthejoy Some trucks have 2000hp but still cannot go over 150kmh. why should i get a grip if you still fail to look past the all the myths and propaganda.
Research on the matter does not involve drooling over youtube vids.
Why don't you start off by reading the report written by Pierre Sprey, designer of the A10, F15 and F16. Then read further into existing problems like rain peeling off the "stealth" paint, cronic system failures and insane cost of production and maintenance.
@5xthejoy do your own research i cant be bothered to type it all on you tube, only thing i can tell u is search the truth about f-22 and enjoy, oh and BTW its a US study
"the t-50 and su-47 are both superior to the f-22..."
LMAO. Dude, you do know that the F-22 is a fully combat capable and ready 5th gneration jet fighter while SU-47 is only a flight demostrator and the T-50 is still only a Russian prototype of their 5th generation jet fighter, right? But then, considering your screen name is "GamersPlaystations3", you probablely don't as any knowledged you have about the F-22, T-50 or SU-47 came from a Playstation.
@sierra190MK I made this account when i was 13, Now besides that go look up minimum radius turns and maneuverability for the Su-47 every jet starts our as a prototype, if all my knowledge came from "PS3" I wouldn't be watching these vids and researching on my spare time.
The SU-47 can only achieve and maintain HAOA turns at subsonic speed. Try any of those turns at the supersonic speed where most dogfights occur and the jet will tear itselfs apart.
You might be older now but your knowledge on these jets still sounds like it came from a PS3, and your resulting comments on this subject are epic fails. B-T-W, your YouTube personal profile and screen background is not helping your credibility either on this subject.
@VahanExpert one plane lost cause of a malfunction, and the f22 is actually more stealthy than the f117, the f117 lacked senors that the f22 has thus it was more vulnerable than the f22, plus the f117 was a slow moving bomber that was old then, the f117 penetrated far better defenses than serbia and came home unscathed many times, 1 plane lost vs thousands of sorties where the enemy didnt know where you were and completed their mission, thats a hige sucess rate
Well you are correct no weapon is invincible but I would say that detractors of stealth like to go back to the F-117 in Serbia which history will show was a one off lucky shot. F-117 flew hundreds of sorties before and since that first one was shot down. That is still pretty damn good ratio, hundreds of successful sorties vs one shoot down? It's not even close.
Remember, the f-22 has far better stealth, speed, altitude, maneuverability and defenses than the 1960s designed f-117
@TATARSTAN59500 Hey you Fucker, just sit there with your keyboard and enjoy the internet brought to you by The United States of America. You could'nt burn water Dumb-Ass. GO USAF.
@rex3453 Stop talking out your ASS!!! You have NO idea. US is the Most Powerful Nation because our weapons are 2nd to none. Now shove your statement up your ASS. Dumbo.
@5xthejoy ...that's exactly why my initial statement was saying how much of a failure the F-22 was. All of the people I stated did NOT want the F-22 to continue and canceled it. Go read up, kid. More than likely you're probably a teenager in afJrotc (notice: the "J" is capitalized) who thinks he/she knows everything. To put it simply what ever officer who knows a damn says about the cRaptor: "It sure is a good plane...when it's flying."
@rex3453 Ok, you know what? I LOVE the RAPTOR, and you hate the RAPTOR. Just leave it at that. Write me back when the RAPTORS go out and kick some ass. Then you can tell me how impressed you were. okay? GO USAF. Have a good life.
@5xthejoy Well seeing how the F-22 is about to get grounded yet again because of yet another recent incident and seeing how the F-22 is completely pathetic compared to the F-15 and F-16's air-to-ground capabilities (because air-to-air combat is non-existent), I think it's safe to say the F-22 will never be seeing any true combat. I don't hate the F-22. It's an amazing aircraft when it's flying, but when you look at the cons, it's a paper weight. By the way, the F-35 is looking like a mistake too
@rex3453 You have to realize which each fighter/striker is built for. The F-22 is designed to be a stealth fighter with excellent maneuverability to go on pre-strike sweeps and claim air superiority. The 15's, 16, and 18's dont worry so much about stealth, so they can carry LASER targeting pods and more A/G ordinance. The F-22 will smoke any of those aircraft in an A/A engagement. BTW, they will figure out the OBOGS system, the jet will be fine.
@dwillpirate The F-22 was designed to take out Soviet Union aircraft. Looks like that won't be needed. Not only that, but what is it used for again? Right. Air to air. It's useless in today's day and age. Even in today's world, I doubt we really need an F-22 to go up against 1980's technology MiG's.
@rex3453 Interesting that you say that. Russian Mig-29's (possibly future Mig-35's), SU-27's (and their variants), Sukhoi T-50's, as well as Chinese J-10's, and future J-20's all pose a very serious threat. If a major conflict breaks out between two nations with solid air assets, the F-22 would be pretty nice to have. We could debate whether or not two major nations would do that, but it's not the point. BTW, the Russians definitely have some solid post 1980's technology out there....
@dwillpirate Except that's the thing, intelligence agencies such as the CIA have given reports stating that a war between the US and China is VERY farfetched. Russia vs the US will probably also never happen despite what video game storyline writers say.
@rex3453 And why are those wars very unlikely? It's because both sides continue to produce incredible machines with incredible potential. If either side stops researching and stops employing new technology, the other side becomes less fearful of going to war. There is a term we use called Peace Through Strength. Having the F-22, the F-35 and continuing to research new technology increases our strength, and helps to insure peace. BTW, its not up to the CIA whether or not we go to war...
@dwillpirate It's not up to the CIA, but seeing how they predicted events that have happened, I think they hold a candle to saying we will never go to war with either Russia or China. Tell you what, what makes you think we would go to war with China in the first place? Also, our F-15's and F-16's are well capable of going up against their latest fighters. In fact, those same aircraft are getting upgrades as we speak; that's all I can say about that.
@rex3453 What have they predicted? I am not saying that we will go to Russia or China, actually I seriously doubt we would, for the reasons I mentioned in my previous post. But we dont stop building war assets when we feel comfortable. As I said before, peace through strength. Think about it, why has no country with a nuclear weapon ever been attacked? Same thing with other aspects of warfare. Funny you say that, the Chinese J-10, is comparable to our fighters and the J-11 is better...
@dwillpirate The J-11 is better, but look at the shear amount of fighters we have compared to theirs. I get what you're saying, but the alternatives (like the Silent Eagle) would have been much better than the juggernaut spending F-22 and F-35 planes.
@rex3453 Right now we have more, but China has increased their defense spending by huge amounts over the last few years, and put their first carrier out to sea. I seriously doubt they will stop at one. The Silent Eagle has it's place, no doubt. But again, you have to look at what the airplane is built for. The F-15 is not great for A/A intercept and is terrible in the WVR arena (dogfighting). The F-22 is hands down our best close range fighter, the JSF-35 will add other awesome capabilites
@dwillpirate The JSF adds awesome capabilities? Our current line up of fighters probably already out do the F-35 seeing how countless problems (to this date) are arising (for example, the fact that it can only achieve 50% of it's supposed max thrust) with both it's design as well as the fact that it's just the jack-of-all-trades plane. Both of these "5th generation fighters" serve more like money sink holes than anything else.
@rex3453 Hmm... The most advanced A/A radar in history, the most advanced avionics sweet, the most advanced integration of radar, IR and helmet mounted sensors. Stealth technology (rivaled only by the F-22) and probably the biggest thing, maintenance effectiveness (man hours of maintenance required per flight hour). We can back fit our current jets with upgrades, but trust me, things don't integrate as well when the airframe was not designed for them. Every jet in history has had problems...
@dwillpirate Are you kidding me? Problems with the F-35 (both of which being the RADAR and the new HUD in the helmet) are arising as we speak that closely relate to the F-22. Then you tell me the maintenance on it is simple!? Jesus Christ....
@rex3453 Well, I dont think Jesus has much to do with this. Please good sir, explain which radar and helmet mounted cuing systems are arising. And, the idea of the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force all having F-35s brings down the cost per aircraft. Also, since each branch will be flying the same platform, maintenance can be done on a Navy jet at and Air Force base and so on... Once again, do we have all of the bugs worked out? No, does that mean we give up? No...
@rex3453 YOU DONT KNOW? So when you said the 35 had helmet and radar problems you just made that up? Actually, to be honest, I already knew that you had no idea what you are talking about. Not sure what your hatred toward the F-22 and F-35 programs are, but it is quite obvious you have an anti-22/35 agenda. The Navy does not want the F-35? Cool, another made up "fact" from Rex. Actually, the Navy does. We have already started developing tactics based on the capabilities of the F-35...
@dwillpirate No. My "I don't know" part was a response to not giving up. Since the USAF gave up on the F-22, they're probably already having doubts about the F-35 like the Navy. Good reading comprehension there. Any simple google search gives you all of the problems the F-35 has. Just recently the pylons in the wings were reported to be bad for the design and have to be redesigned to fix the problem, this was released two weeks ago. The Navy has already disclosed doubts about the F-35...
@dwillpirate Continued, you can look this up by googling "f-35 wing problem surfaces" and an aol article will be shown. Then in the same article, "the difficult thing for the program will be the optic of the F-35B -- on probation already and under fire by senior Navy officials -- encountering a new problem...here's more proof the Marine plane is so complex that it should be shelved." The marine plane line being a direct link to ANOTHER article showing that the VTOL f-35 will be canned.
@dwillpirate Then, googling "Report Reveals Undisclosed F-35 Problem" you will get an article from defense news, in the article you'll find the quote "Further, the report indicates problems with the aircraft's helmet-mounted display (HMD). Unlike many previous aircraft, the F-35 does not have a cockpit-mounted head-up display; the pilot instead views critical data projected on the helmet visor. " See what happens when you have common sense, kid? You'll find all sorts of information on this.
@dwillpirate And for my final response to your smart ass comment, Lockheed Martin just held a conference with Naval officials trying to sell the F-35 to them since they know they're already in such doubt that they'll just can the plane all together and stick to their super hornets. So again, you should probably hush up when talking about things you have no clue about. Like 5xthejog, you're probably a JROTC high school teenager who thinks he/she knows everything; you don't.
@rex3453 People usually stop arguing when they realize that they dont know what they are talking about and have been made to look unintelligent... The F-35 was sold to the navy a long time ago bud, it already happened. Weapons manufacturers constantly have meetings with the consumer (military) to inform them of new tech and upgrades. There is no talk in the Navy of scraping the F-35. If you can provide a credible source that says otherwise, please present it. BTW, (I'm a hornet pilot. shhh)
@rex3453 BULLSHIT!!! Well that makes me a F-22 pilot. Real Fighter Pilots don't come on YT and argue about Fighter Jets. They know what they know. These comments are for us armchair / keyboard pilots to argue. You can come out of your wet dream and hang with us "Keyboard Boys".
@5xthejoy You're correct. 'Real' fighter pilots are going about life getting blow jobs from random ladies while going to clubs and hollering to their flight buddies via their call signs. Sorry kid, but I honestly couldn't care less if you thought I were lying or not. Here's a hint: no matter what job someone has, they're still a normal human being that does normal human being things, for instance going on the internet.
@2564651jcr Don't be silly. It kills the enemy of the USA only. Where the fuck you from?! Can't believe you made such a STUPID statement on this very video. You're Fucking watching WEAPONS Idiot.
@dwillpirate It doesn't MATTER what you think!!! C'mon, I hope you are smart enough to put a sentence together. F-22 RAPTOR just flew over my house about 20 mins ago. Believe me RAPTORS are flying. GO USAF.
@5xthejoy Woah, bro. No need for the hostility and disrespect. The reason why I couldnt figure out what you said was because you left out a pretty major part of the sentence. I will take your word that one flew over your house, but I am pretty sure that I read something about Langley downing all of their jets after another hypoxia event. Where do you live?
guys the Su37 is beter in the air of raptor the only good of raptor is the stealth but 1 raptor vs 1 su-37 for sure su-37 wins for fun i love raptor but this is the true su-37 is the best no stealth jet and can win in the air vs any jet
@PoisoNFanguS first please do some research, the su37 is a demonstration, 2 converted su35s, the su37 is not a military plane and will not be produced, 1on1 the raptor wins easily, raptor pilots train being out numbered 4-1,6-1, sorry the su35 stands no chance against a raptor
F-22 is bullshit. can't fly in rain (stealth paint), can't fly low due to bad armor light rounds will penetrate. 1 hour of flight = 30 hours maintanace. every 1.7 hours critical system failure. and can't comunicate with any other aircraft. lost to eurofighters badly in redflag and us was making excuses. never seen combat. su-35 will dominate this aircraft in range speed maneuvarability avionics and ofcoarse air to air missile. huge waste of money...
@alex080297 the f22 is no more vulnerable flying low than any other fighter avaliable today, the su 35 is still unknown what it's future holds, oh and that washington times story on the raptor is false. they cost 142 million a plane and only requires 10.5 hrs per 1 hr flight. cant cominucate with other planes, orignally yes, but now no, radar can aquire 100 targets at one time and can act as a mini awacs, oh and its radar cant be tracked like other radar can, f22 owns all
america should hand back what is not theirs which is alot of things these days....u have to learn to control debt and not want more than what u dont have u stupid fuckin american bastards
america should hand back what is not theirs which is alot of things these days....u have to learn to control debt and not want more than what u dont have u stupid fuckin american bastards
@unitedclean04 Actually China's debt is also something like 80% of it's GDP, except China invested billions in fixed assets like transport infrastructure to avoid recession so they're in for a difficult future trying to deal with their own bad debts.
@kerouac50 Actually, China is the only country that doesn't have that much debt problems. I saw a statics map recently, it had over-debt countries painted red, slightly debt countries yellow, countries with almost no debt with green. There was only one country painted green. And it was China.
@OnlyLifeMatters According to China's official figures their debt is 17% of GDP, but banks who have looked into it say that it runs at more like 80% of GDP, which is about the same as Britain's last year.
There was an interesting special report in The Economist about this, although China's debt problems aren't as bad as the US they're still worrying for Beijing.
You are right that China has no debt and that is because they DON'T HAVE WELFARE or Social Security or Medicare for their 1.3B people which would destroy them if they offered money to their elderly like we do here in the USA. Think about this: China's economy is still less that 1/2 the USA, WE SPEND AS MUCH ON OUR 60M ELDERLY as the Chinese government spends on healthcare, military, highways, high-speed trains, education for young, etc., FOR 1.3B PEOPLE!!!
@madmanatsea Well you in USA as well have pretty shitty social security. In fact, Europe is pretty much the only continent where proper healthcare exists. Chinese welfare is based entirely on capitalism's rules, meaning that if you succeed in what you do you can afford personal security. Chinese education scores better than American one btw :) American education is a joke.
@Jormondor95 why is it useless, cause it can kill the su 100 miles away, or is invisble to radar, or can win in a close in turning fight, due to its superior speed bleed/regain ability, the enemy of a pilot in a dogfight is airspeed loss, and the f22 doesnt lose air speed, or the fact that the su don't have AESA radar or weapons as advanced or combat proven as AMRAMS
@Jormondor95 oh please that bullshit, sure russia has a missile that can lock onto stealth sure, and that old dude is senial, and plus as much as he hates the raptor, you should what he say's about migs and su's , he described them as turkey's that only ameture pilots would ever even fly, those videos are false, and in the future their are 2 types of planes, stealth planes (f22) and targets (su27,30,33,35)
@Jormondor95 yes problems with the oxygen system, which was the cause of a crash in alaska, but dont get ahead of your self, every great us plane has been grounded at some point in there lives, and the f22s are scheduled to begin flying again in late fall, but honestly, the raptor has no real oppenent until the sukhoi t50 and j20 are operational, after 2015 for the t50 and 2018 for the j20, the question remains if the russians and chinese have the rare metals required to build a large number
@5xthejoy; What would you say if Raptors would be blown out of the skies? In other words - the other way around? Just imagine that such thing happened, I'm just wondering what your reaction would be like.
@DaveTE15 Don't believe that will happen, cause the guys who put this Jet together already took great care of that. You see the Great F-15 was made or flew in 1971 as the new Super Fighter, and it's still running the table today. 40 yrs later USA will not spend that kind of money to go backwards. US.Technology is too advance right now.Imagine 65 thousand ft, going Mach1.8 or more and no one knows you're there, but you see everything going on. Must feel like you're a little god. GO USAF.
@5xthejoy Dumbass american are so dumbass the think Mr.clean is on the american dollar ΒUΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH
Normally the jet fighter has two gas tanks hang under the wings to have enough gas for long distance but this one doesn't, how it stays in the sky for so long, jet burns lots of gas, that is disadvantage compare to the old jets.
Second on the music.
Oh and great video as well.
BattleshipAgincourt 1 week ago
Could someone tell me who does the music? I love it but I've never figured out who wrote it
AltairRules 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can see more on this amazing plane from a display at the Farnborough International Airshow by searching for 'F-22 Raptor at Farnborough Airshow' here on YouTube. Yes, it may be the most advanced fighter plane in the world. I'm just glad we in the UK have the best pilots and are currently co-developing the best weapons in the world. If we had a bigger budget, we might be able to do better with planes too, but we'll leave that to the Americans for now... Æ
BuddyBoy682 1 month ago
Comment removed
BuddyBoy682 1 month ago
A very impressive aircraft. I'm glad it ours 7 not 'theirs'.
LaRoque17 1 month ago
This was not badly composed, f39egale2, do you mind me asking you how long this took, I'm going to start making my own videos within a year or two.
Omatollis 2 months ago
with f22 and f35 along with our massive fleet of other fighters the u.s. along with nato are a force no one can recon with
rockysmith4982 2 months ago
how much costs one of this toys? how much costs 3 rockets which can bring one down? or a emp rocket?
ardalanhamrah 2 months ago
@ardalanhamrah "rocket
hahaha@ you believing it's practical to attempt to engage an aircraft with unguided rockets.
also hahaha@ you not understanding pretty much 100% of all significant military hardware is EMP-hardened.
SayokoHatsuya 2 months ago
2:34 Bird!
tuinopo80 3 months ago
I love that this thing has a Gatling gun. Such a low probability of use on an aircraft supporting BVRM's and the enhanced AIM-9's, but still so necessary. Glad they learned from the F-4.
brazzaka 3 months ago
i can't wait to wreak some havoc with this in gta 5. :D
akotagazarraga 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's funny how the top comments are all about how the F-22 is the best plane ever. Too bad Schwartz, Mullen, and both Obama and McCain said otherwise.
rex3453 4 months ago
@rex3453 Jack-ass it wasn't any of them it was Gates. Get your facts straight.
5xthejoy 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
hahaha aim-9x is fully shit comparate to
russian r-73 hahaha r-73 have x3 quasily performance of aim-9x
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
@TATARSTAN59500 Actually, the AIM-9X is very comparable to, and better than, the AA-11 Archer (R-73) in all comparable statistics. With JHMCS, the seeker head can be slewed further than the Russian HMS, the Sidewinder has better IRCCM on the rail than the Archer and (in my opinion the big one) the American pilots have far more flight time and training in the WVR arena than Russian pilots.
dwillpirate 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@dwillpirate no r-73 have completly nothing compare range
speed same explosiv dammage too
have10kg more than aim-9x probably solid fuel but have 10.000metrs more range than aim-9x
or probanly have other missile similar of r(73 range
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
@TATARSTAN59500 First, I would work on putting together an intelligent sentence if I were you. The ranges for both missiles are classified, and unless you have access to that information not sure how you can come up with comparisons. And, if you do have access to that type of intel, you would know that you are completely BS'ing yourself.
dwillpirate 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@dwillpirate yes but not aim-x9 dumbass
and no talk shit of russian army but when time of war is coming......
TATARSTAN59500 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
...yes your opinion
totally yankee reaction
better better better yes ok !
TATARSTAN59500 3 months ago
@TATARSTAN59500 Nope, I just tried to bring the facts to the table. You said that the 9X is crap compared to the 73, and its simply not true. Dont get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for the 73, and certainly hope I never see one in real life. I'm not putting anyone or anything down. Just stating facts.
dwillpirate 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dwillpirate no in other video
f-22 compare to mig-35 .......!!!! who i not su-35bm or su-37
and tow in old t-72 ......... so easy who i not in 2011 t-90ms
TATARSTAN59500 3 months ago
@TATARSTAN59500 Dude, again. You really need to work on your ability to put a sentence together. I just plain cant understand what you are saying. As far as the Mig-35 goes, yes, it is pretty awesome airplane. However, how many are operational? Also, in today's air warfare, great maneuverability and power are only part of the equation. Long range missiles, stealth, radar and pilot aptitude are huge, and I would argue Russia does not dominate those categories.
dwillpirate 3 months ago 2
@dwillpirate Agreed there. Very true. This guy is just slinging from the hip, anything and everything he can think of. Deep down he knows the F-22 is the BOSS. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 3 months ago 2
@5xthejoy Think of? I'm stating nothing but facts here. The F-22 is a "boss" in the air when it's flying, too bad it rarely does because of it's flaws.
rex3453 3 months ago
im pretty sure that the worlds most advanced aircraft is the flying saucer in my back yard....... go USAF!
unlimited613 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The F22 is overrated, lost vs RAF typhoons over China Lake where the typhoons locked on at long range. USAF claimed they where unstealthed and cancelled the 2 vs2 dogfight. Just proves the whole hype is all from military propaganda and another fail wouldh've been bad for the image.
Fact is the f22 has never seen real combat, is too reliant on sensors, "stealth" and other tech, heavy and slow to be of any use in todays combat enviroment.
And that is not mentioning it's MANY other flaws.
badInvention 4 months ago
@badInvention Oh yeah 70,000 lbs of thrust is slow. Get a grip. F-22 puts FEAR in the hearts of enemy fighter pilots. US Military "We are not looking for a fair fight". F-22 RAPTOR nuff said. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 4 months ago 21
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy Some trucks have 2000hp but still cannot go over 150kmh. why should i get a grip if you still fail to look past the all the myths and propaganda.
Research on the matter does not involve drooling over youtube vids.
Why don't you start off by reading the report written by Pierre Sprey, designer of the A10, F15 and F16. Then read further into existing problems like rain peeling off the "stealth" paint, cronic system failures and insane cost of production and maintenance.
badInvention 4 months ago
@badInvention Old news. We are in 2011 now. Wake up and stop hating. F--22 will rip you a new asshole. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 4 months ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy If your goverment can affird to keep it in the air
badInvention 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy the t-50 and su-47 are both superior to the f-22, lol
GamersPlaystation3 3 months ago
@GamersPlaystation3 Sorry your statement is a BIG FAIL.
5xthejoy 3 months ago
@5xthejoy do your own research i cant be bothered to type it all on you tube, only thing i can tell u is search the truth about f-22 and enjoy, oh and BTW its a US study
GamersPlaystation3 3 months ago
@GamersPlaystation3
"the t-50 and su-47 are both superior to the f-22..."
LMAO. Dude, you do know that the F-22 is a fully combat capable and ready 5th gneration jet fighter while SU-47 is only a flight demostrator and the T-50 is still only a Russian prototype of their 5th generation jet fighter, right? But then, considering your screen name is "GamersPlaystations3", you probablely don't as any knowledged you have about the F-22, T-50 or SU-47 came from a Playstation.
sierra190MK 2 months ago 2
@sierra190MK I made this account when i was 13, Now besides that go look up minimum radius turns and maneuverability for the Su-47 every jet starts our as a prototype, if all my knowledge came from "PS3" I wouldn't be watching these vids and researching on my spare time.
GamersPlaystation3 2 months ago
@GamersPlaystation3
The SU-47 can only achieve and maintain HAOA turns at subsonic speed. Try any of those turns at the supersonic speed where most dogfights occur and the jet will tear itselfs apart.
You might be older now but your knowledge on these jets still sounds like it came from a PS3, and your resulting comments on this subject are epic fails. B-T-W, your YouTube personal profile and screen background is not helping your credibility either on this subject.
sierra190MK 2 months ago
@sierra190MK u have to understand there are no jet games for ps3.... I am a heavy gamer true, but yea.
GamersPlaystation3 2 months ago
@GamersPlaystation3
I dunno why you're mentioning the SU-47, since it has never, or will never see combat or be anything beyond a flight demonstrator.
Do more research and less gaming, kthxbai.
Frostbite249 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Frostbite249 well your a dumb nigger, kthnxbai.
GamersPlaystation3 2 months ago
@GamersPlaystation3
You calling me a nigger in the face of the facts only proves you're the dumbass here. kthxbai gtfo duncomeback.
Frostbite249 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Frostbite249 nigger
GamersPlaystation3 2 months ago
@GamersPlaystation3
Aww, don't take it hard buddy...
U MAD BRO?!
Well take a good look at all the fucks I give!!!
Frostbite249 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Frostbite249 18, damn niggers, and the 18 fucks they give.
GamersPlaystation3 2 months ago
@GamersPlaystation3
You're funny kid. Stupid, but funny. If only you were smarter... The world needs less stupid people, y'know?
Frostbite249 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Frostbite249 nigger
GamersPlaystation3 2 months ago
Comment removed
sierra190MK 2 months ago
@sierra190MK LOL You RIPPED gamersplaystation3 a new Ass-Hole. Thumbs up.
5xthejoy 2 months ago 3
they should make a plane designed for shooting like 40 missles at once:
TERMINAL: we have an enemy plane approaching, engage the enemy
5 MISSILE PLANES: FIRE!!
100 missiles demolish the enemy
THAT BE FUN!!
GTSRyan 4 months ago
id reckon that the scientist at lockheed get paid very well, perhaps like winning the lottery every forth night.
14jrlion 4 months ago
incredible what human can build just unbeliveable
Mor0utlaws 4 months ago
human cannot withstand the g's this thing puts off at full thrust if i remember right
Homegrownmaster 4 months ago
When will this fucking song stop from using in videos here in youtube????!!!!!
kotonizna 4 months ago
The fuck with this song!
IauthenticI 4 months ago
@VahanExpert one plane lost cause of a malfunction, and the f22 is actually more stealthy than the f117, the f117 lacked senors that the f22 has thus it was more vulnerable than the f22, plus the f117 was a slow moving bomber that was old then, the f117 penetrated far better defenses than serbia and came home unscathed many times, 1 plane lost vs thousands of sorties where the enemy didnt know where you were and completed their mission, thats a hige sucess rate
packr72 4 months ago 2
mute this video, open a new YouTube Tab, type Assault Horizon - Level 1 FULL SONG (BGM/OST), and prepare for epic.
fer2789 4 months ago
@VahanExpert
Well you are correct no weapon is invincible but I would say that detractors of stealth like to go back to the F-117 in Serbia which history will show was a one off lucky shot. F-117 flew hundreds of sorties before and since that first one was shot down. That is still pretty damn good ratio, hundreds of successful sorties vs one shoot down? It's not even close.
Remember, the f-22 has far better stealth, speed, altitude, maneuverability and defenses than the 1960s designed f-117
TheProjektcc 4 months ago 3
Best plane EVA and has stealth capablitites nearly impossible to be shot down go USA
jamestuc80 5 months ago
F-22's are Back in the air. FYI: for all you haters!!! Hahahahha. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 5 months ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy when time of war is coming i burn your country lol !
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
@TATARSTAN59500 Hey you Fucker, just sit there with your keyboard and enjoy the internet brought to you by The United States of America. You could'nt burn water Dumb-Ass. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 4 months ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy hey you fucker
dream
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy Except he's right. The AIM-9X has shown nothing but problems; similar how the F-35 and F-22 have shown problems. Way of the future my ass.
rex3453 4 months ago
@rex3453 Stop talking out your ASS!!! You have NO idea. US is the Most Powerful Nation because our weapons are 2nd to none. Now shove your statement up your ASS. Dumbo.
5xthejoy 4 months ago 6
Seems to me you don't know anything here. I think the general of the joint chiefs of staff of the USAF knows a lot more about the F-22 then you do.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 Ah HELLO? They know more than you and I. Dummy.
5xthejoy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy ...that's exactly why my initial statement was saying how much of a failure the F-22 was. All of the people I stated did NOT want the F-22 to continue and canceled it. Go read up, kid. More than likely you're probably a teenager in afJrotc (notice: the "J" is capitalized) who thinks he/she knows everything. To put it simply what ever officer who knows a damn says about the cRaptor: "It sure is a good plane...when it's flying."
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 Ok, you know what? I LOVE the RAPTOR, and you hate the RAPTOR. Just leave it at that. Write me back when the RAPTORS go out and kick some ass. Then you can tell me how impressed you were. okay? GO USAF. Have a good life.
5xthejoy 3 months ago
@5xthejoy Well seeing how the F-22 is about to get grounded yet again because of yet another recent incident and seeing how the F-22 is completely pathetic compared to the F-15 and F-16's air-to-ground capabilities (because air-to-air combat is non-existent), I think it's safe to say the F-22 will never be seeing any true combat. I don't hate the F-22. It's an amazing aircraft when it's flying, but when you look at the cons, it's a paper weight. By the way, the F-35 is looking like a mistake too
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 You have to realize which each fighter/striker is built for. The F-22 is designed to be a stealth fighter with excellent maneuverability to go on pre-strike sweeps and claim air superiority. The 15's, 16, and 18's dont worry so much about stealth, so they can carry LASER targeting pods and more A/G ordinance. The F-22 will smoke any of those aircraft in an A/A engagement. BTW, they will figure out the OBOGS system, the jet will be fine.
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate The F-22 was designed to take out Soviet Union aircraft. Looks like that won't be needed. Not only that, but what is it used for again? Right. Air to air. It's useless in today's day and age. Even in today's world, I doubt we really need an F-22 to go up against 1980's technology MiG's.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 Interesting that you say that. Russian Mig-29's (possibly future Mig-35's), SU-27's (and their variants), Sukhoi T-50's, as well as Chinese J-10's, and future J-20's all pose a very serious threat. If a major conflict breaks out between two nations with solid air assets, the F-22 would be pretty nice to have. We could debate whether or not two major nations would do that, but it's not the point. BTW, the Russians definitely have some solid post 1980's technology out there....
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Except that's the thing, intelligence agencies such as the CIA have given reports stating that a war between the US and China is VERY farfetched. Russia vs the US will probably also never happen despite what video game storyline writers say.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 And why are those wars very unlikely? It's because both sides continue to produce incredible machines with incredible potential. If either side stops researching and stops employing new technology, the other side becomes less fearful of going to war. There is a term we use called Peace Through Strength. Having the F-22, the F-35 and continuing to research new technology increases our strength, and helps to insure peace. BTW, its not up to the CIA whether or not we go to war...
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate It's not up to the CIA, but seeing how they predicted events that have happened, I think they hold a candle to saying we will never go to war with either Russia or China. Tell you what, what makes you think we would go to war with China in the first place? Also, our F-15's and F-16's are well capable of going up against their latest fighters. In fact, those same aircraft are getting upgrades as we speak; that's all I can say about that.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 What have they predicted? I am not saying that we will go to Russia or China, actually I seriously doubt we would, for the reasons I mentioned in my previous post. But we dont stop building war assets when we feel comfortable. As I said before, peace through strength. Think about it, why has no country with a nuclear weapon ever been attacked? Same thing with other aspects of warfare. Funny you say that, the Chinese J-10, is comparable to our fighters and the J-11 is better...
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate The J-11 is better, but look at the shear amount of fighters we have compared to theirs. I get what you're saying, but the alternatives (like the Silent Eagle) would have been much better than the juggernaut spending F-22 and F-35 planes.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 Right now we have more, but China has increased their defense spending by huge amounts over the last few years, and put their first carrier out to sea. I seriously doubt they will stop at one. The Silent Eagle has it's place, no doubt. But again, you have to look at what the airplane is built for. The F-15 is not great for A/A intercept and is terrible in the WVR arena (dogfighting). The F-22 is hands down our best close range fighter, the JSF-35 will add other awesome capabilites
dwillpirate 3 months ago
capabilities...
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate The JSF adds awesome capabilities? Our current line up of fighters probably already out do the F-35 seeing how countless problems (to this date) are arising (for example, the fact that it can only achieve 50% of it's supposed max thrust) with both it's design as well as the fact that it's just the jack-of-all-trades plane. Both of these "5th generation fighters" serve more like money sink holes than anything else.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 Hmm... The most advanced A/A radar in history, the most advanced avionics sweet, the most advanced integration of radar, IR and helmet mounted sensors. Stealth technology (rivaled only by the F-22) and probably the biggest thing, maintenance effectiveness (man hours of maintenance required per flight hour). We can back fit our current jets with upgrades, but trust me, things don't integrate as well when the airframe was not designed for them. Every jet in history has had problems...
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Are you kidding me? Problems with the F-35 (both of which being the RADAR and the new HUD in the helmet) are arising as we speak that closely relate to the F-22. Then you tell me the maintenance on it is simple!? Jesus Christ....
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 Well, I dont think Jesus has much to do with this. Please good sir, explain which radar and helmet mounted cuing systems are arising. And, the idea of the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force all having F-35s brings down the cost per aircraft. Also, since each branch will be flying the same platform, maintenance can be done on a Navy jet at and Air Force base and so on... Once again, do we have all of the bugs worked out? No, does that mean we give up? No...
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Don't give up? Well I don't know. Speaking of the Navy....did you not know that the Navy DOES NOT want the F-35?
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 YOU DONT KNOW? So when you said the 35 had helmet and radar problems you just made that up? Actually, to be honest, I already knew that you had no idea what you are talking about. Not sure what your hatred toward the F-22 and F-35 programs are, but it is quite obvious you have an anti-22/35 agenda. The Navy does not want the F-35? Cool, another made up "fact" from Rex. Actually, the Navy does. We have already started developing tactics based on the capabilities of the F-35...
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate No. My "I don't know" part was a response to not giving up. Since the USAF gave up on the F-22, they're probably already having doubts about the F-35 like the Navy. Good reading comprehension there. Any simple google search gives you all of the problems the F-35 has. Just recently the pylons in the wings were reported to be bad for the design and have to be redesigned to fix the problem, this was released two weeks ago. The Navy has already disclosed doubts about the F-35...
rex3453 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Continued, you can look this up by googling "f-35 wing problem surfaces" and an aol article will be shown. Then in the same article, "the difficult thing for the program will be the optic of the F-35B -- on probation already and under fire by senior Navy officials -- encountering a new problem...here's more proof the Marine plane is so complex that it should be shelved." The marine plane line being a direct link to ANOTHER article showing that the VTOL f-35 will be canned.
rex3453 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Then, googling "Report Reveals Undisclosed F-35 Problem" you will get an article from defense news, in the article you'll find the quote "Further, the report indicates problems with the aircraft's helmet-mounted display (HMD). Unlike many previous aircraft, the F-35 does not have a cockpit-mounted head-up display; the pilot instead views critical data projected on the helmet visor. " See what happens when you have common sense, kid? You'll find all sorts of information on this.
rex3453 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dwillpirate And for my final response to your smart ass comment, Lockheed Martin just held a conference with Naval officials trying to sell the F-35 to them since they know they're already in such doubt that they'll just can the plane all together and stick to their super hornets. So again, you should probably hush up when talking about things you have no clue about. Like 5xthejog, you're probably a JROTC high school teenager who thinks he/she knows everything; you don't.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 People usually stop arguing when they realize that they dont know what they are talking about and have been made to look unintelligent... The F-35 was sold to the navy a long time ago bud, it already happened. Weapons manufacturers constantly have meetings with the consumer (military) to inform them of new tech and upgrades. There is no talk in the Navy of scraping the F-35. If you can provide a credible source that says otherwise, please present it. BTW, (I'm a hornet pilot. shhh)
dwillpirate 3 months ago 2
@dwillpirate And I'm a F-15 pilot.
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 a hater from within, thats the worst kind...
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Yet the head of the chain of commands all see the things wrong with the 5th gen fighters. Tell me by the way, what is your 'MOS'?
rex3453 3 months ago
@rex3453 I will reply via PM. It has come to my attention I had missed earlier messages due to multiple postings showing up at different places.
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@rex3453 I am disappointed, I was hoping you would reply to my message with some proof of your ramblings...
dwillpirate 3 months ago 2
@rex3453 BULLSHIT!!! Well that makes me a F-22 pilot. Real Fighter Pilots don't come on YT and argue about Fighter Jets. They know what they know. These comments are for us armchair / keyboard pilots to argue. You can come out of your wet dream and hang with us "Keyboard Boys".
5xthejoy 3 months ago 7
@5xthejoy You're correct. 'Real' fighter pilots are going about life getting blow jobs from random ladies while going to clubs and hollering to their flight buddies via their call signs. Sorry kid, but I honestly couldn't care less if you thought I were lying or not. Here's a hint: no matter what job someone has, they're still a normal human being that does normal human being things, for instance going on the internet.
rex3453 2 months ago
@5xthejoy since when were weapons that killed people something to brag about :/
2564651jcr 2 months ago
@2564651jcr Don't be silly. It kills the enemy of the USA only. Where the fuck you from?! Can't believe you made such a STUPID statement on this very video. You're Fucking watching WEAPONS Idiot.
5xthejoy 2 months ago
@5xthejoy the internet was made by an english bloke, sorry dude...
xSRL32xx 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy. I think they are down again....
dwillpirate 4 months ago
@dwillpirate It doesn't what you think!!! GO USAF.
5xthejoy 4 months ago
@5xthejoy What? That makes no sense.
dwillpirate 4 months ago
@dwillpirate It doesn't MATTER what you think!!! C'mon, I hope you are smart enough to put a sentence together. F-22 RAPTOR just flew over my house about 20 mins ago. Believe me RAPTORS are flying. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 4 months ago
@5xthejoy Woah, bro. No need for the hostility and disrespect. The reason why I couldnt figure out what you said was because you left out a pretty major part of the sentence. I will take your word that one flew over your house, but I am pretty sure that I read something about Langley downing all of their jets after another hypoxia event. Where do you live?
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Sorry bro, just sick of these ppl talking smack about the F-22's. It's all good. I live in Hawaii. Last count we have 11 F-22's.
5xthejoy 3 months ago
@5xthejoy Is that Hickam? Didnt know they had a squadron out there.
dwillpirate 3 months ago
@dwillpirate Yeah Alaska and Hawaii because of the Asian Pacific begin a hot spot for the US. It's Hickam AFB.
5xthejoy 3 months ago
at last true love
MyHeners1 5 months ago
F-22 is the best !
MaverickDiouf 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
guys the Su37 is beter in the air of raptor the only good of raptor is the stealth but 1 raptor vs 1 su-37 for sure su-37 wins for fun i love raptor but this is the true su-37 is the best no stealth jet and can win in the air vs any jet
PoisoNFanguS 5 months ago
@PoisoNFanguS first please do some research, the su37 is a demonstration, 2 converted su35s, the su37 is not a military plane and will not be produced, 1on1 the raptor wins easily, raptor pilots train being out numbered 4-1,6-1, sorry the su35 stands no chance against a raptor
packr72 4 months ago 5
@packr72 Your statement is sooo correct. ruski plains oops planes are so outdated. LOL
5xthejoy 4 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
cant touch the eurofighter typhoon tho :)
nukeman82 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hahahhahah you really think that what you say is true on Discovery
draganruso 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The ultimate proof america is the new roman empire, but now we all know what happened to the romans right?
larzinator1988 5 months ago
5 suchoi t50 pilots were jealous, oh wait russia only has 2 t50s, my bad
packr72 6 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
F-22 is bullshit. can't fly in rain (stealth paint), can't fly low due to bad armor light rounds will penetrate. 1 hour of flight = 30 hours maintanace. every 1.7 hours critical system failure. and can't comunicate with any other aircraft. lost to eurofighters badly in redflag and us was making excuses. never seen combat. su-35 will dominate this aircraft in range speed maneuvarability avionics and ofcoarse air to air missile. huge waste of money...
alex080297 6 months ago
@alex080297 the f22 is no more vulnerable flying low than any other fighter avaliable today, the su 35 is still unknown what it's future holds, oh and that washington times story on the raptor is false. they cost 142 million a plane and only requires 10.5 hrs per 1 hr flight. cant cominucate with other planes, orignally yes, but now no, radar can aquire 100 targets at one time and can act as a mini awacs, oh and its radar cant be tracked like other radar can, f22 owns all
packr72 6 months ago
Т 50 на голову выше чем он.
CHIKAN13 6 months ago
good choice of music
michiganman678 6 months ago
It's a shame that the US has now realised that the F-22 is basically a waste of money and has stopped producing them.
kerouac50 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
america should hand back what is not theirs which is alot of things these days....u have to learn to control debt and not want more than what u dont have u stupid fuckin american bastards
unitedclean04 6 months ago
@unitedclean04 I went to your page and saw no one really likes you, so i thought you're one Fucked up guy and an IDIOT!!! nuff said. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 6 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
america should hand back what is not theirs which is alot of things these days....u have to learn to control debt and not want more than what u dont have u stupid fuckin american bastards
unitedclean04 6 months ago
i presume all american military has been funded through other countries monies
unitedclean04 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i presume these planes belong to china really because its not american money lol
unitedclean04 6 months ago
@unitedclean04 Actually China's debt is also something like 80% of it's GDP, except China invested billions in fixed assets like transport infrastructure to avoid recession so they're in for a difficult future trying to deal with their own bad debts.
kerouac50 6 months ago
@kerouac50 Actually, China is the only country that doesn't have that much debt problems. I saw a statics map recently, it had over-debt countries painted red, slightly debt countries yellow, countries with almost no debt with green. There was only one country painted green. And it was China.
OnlyLifeMatters 6 months ago
@OnlyLifeMatters According to China's official figures their debt is 17% of GDP, but banks who have looked into it say that it runs at more like 80% of GDP, which is about the same as Britain's last year.
There was an interesting special report in The Economist about this, although China's debt problems aren't as bad as the US they're still worrying for Beijing.
kerouac50 6 months ago
@OnlyLifeMatters
You are right that China has no debt and that is because they DON'T HAVE WELFARE or Social Security or Medicare for their 1.3B people which would destroy them if they offered money to their elderly like we do here in the USA. Think about this: China's economy is still less that 1/2 the USA, WE SPEND AS MUCH ON OUR 60M ELDERLY as the Chinese government spends on healthcare, military, highways, high-speed trains, education for young, etc., FOR 1.3B PEOPLE!!!
madmanatsea 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@madmanatsea Well you in USA as well have pretty shitty social security. In fact, Europe is pretty much the only continent where proper healthcare exists. Chinese welfare is based entirely on capitalism's rules, meaning that if you succeed in what you do you can afford personal security. Chinese education scores better than American one btw :) American education is a joke.
OnlyLifeMatters 6 months ago
that's totally the music from 28 days later
Meareyoujealous 6 months ago
please sell us....JSDF want it.
Zheidentified 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I would love to see 20 su-35's vs. 4 F-22 Raptor's. I KNOW the F-22's will be 20-0. It's that AWESOME. GO USAF!!!
5xthejoy 8 months ago 19
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy 4-4 the su will win lockheed f-22 is useless
Jormondor95 6 months ago
@Jormondor95 Get a Life. You're USELESS! nuff said. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 6 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy epic fail
Jormondor95 6 months ago
@Jormondor95 why is it useless, cause it can kill the su 100 miles away, or is invisble to radar, or can win in a close in turning fight, due to its superior speed bleed/regain ability, the enemy of a pilot in a dogfight is airspeed loss, and the f22 doesnt lose air speed, or the fact that the su don't have AESA radar or weapons as advanced or combat proven as AMRAMS
packr72 5 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@packr72 /watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M
Jormondor95 5 months ago
@Jormondor95 oh please that bullshit, sure russia has a missile that can lock onto stealth sure, and that old dude is senial, and plus as much as he hates the raptor, you should what he say's about migs and su's , he described them as turkey's that only ameture pilots would ever even fly, those videos are false, and in the future their are 2 types of planes, stealth planes (f22) and targets (su27,30,33,35)
packr72 5 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@packr72 but the reality is the f-22 has flight ban
Jormondor95 5 months ago
@Jormondor95 yes problems with the oxygen system, which was the cause of a crash in alaska, but dont get ahead of your self, every great us plane has been grounded at some point in there lives, and the f22s are scheduled to begin flying again in late fall, but honestly, the raptor has no real oppenent until the sukhoi t50 and j20 are operational, after 2015 for the t50 and 2018 for the j20, the question remains if the russians and chinese have the rare metals required to build a large number
packr72 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy You have no idea what modern aircraft are capable of. No aircraft is invincible. at odds of 20-4, your f-22s would be in great jeopardy.
Rotpig 6 months ago
@Rotpig the su 35's would already be shot down from miles away without even knowing the f22's were there
xSANTACRUZx831 6 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@xSANTACRUZx831 the f-22 don't even have missiles to fire to that range, and russian radars are longer range and then american, remember the mig-31?
alex080297 6 months ago
@alex080297 F22 is stealth and have missles capable of hitting targets over 20 miles away
xSANTACRUZx831 6 months ago
@alex080297 aim120d range 180km,
packr72 5 months ago
@5xthejoy 4 raptor can kill half of them with the longrnage missle they got+su 35's wont know their coming.
ahgoon69er 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy; What would you say if Raptors would be blown out of the skies? In other words - the other way around? Just imagine that such thing happened, I'm just wondering what your reaction would be like.
DaveTE15 4 months ago
@DaveTE15 Don't believe that will happen, cause the guys who put this Jet together already took great care of that. You see the Great F-15 was made or flew in 1971 as the new Super Fighter, and it's still running the table today. 40 yrs later USA will not spend that kind of money to go backwards. US.Technology is too advance right now.Imagine 65 thousand ft, going Mach1.8 or more and no one knows you're there, but you see everything going on. Must feel like you're a little god. GO USAF.
5xthejoy 4 months ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy; No, no, no, no, no, you did not understand the question. I asked what if it already happened, not if it's possible. Your reaction?
DaveTE15 4 months ago
@5xthejoy Unfortunately, Russia has only 11 aircraft su-35.
domosil1 4 months ago 2
@domosil1 LOL True that.
5xthejoy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy Dumbass american are so dumbass the think Mr.clean is on the american dollar ΒUΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΗΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH
TheSubzerogr 4 months ago
@TheSubzerogr What a waste of air. Loser. Nothing else to say? FUCKTARD!!! GO USAF.
5xthejoy 4 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy hhahahhaaaaaa the same words...hahahaha
TheSubzerogr 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5xthejoy su-35bm dumbass ans su-37
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Normally the jet fighter has two gas tanks hang under the wings to have enough gas for long distance but this one doesn't, how it stays in the sky for so long, jet burns lots of gas, that is disadvantage compare to the old jets.
maijib2009 8 months ago
meh u can do the same thing in flight simulator anyway
IJustOwnz 8 months ago
what now Russia
pimppat212 8 months ago
song is requiem for a dream if anyone wants to know. ;)
DogmeatFilms 9 months ago