Added: 5 years ago
From: TheTechMuseum
Views: 7,231
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • did he just said natural selection is blind??? oh oh

  • @Serpico261

    Have to be to believe that stuff.

  • I dont understand english so I can think of Peter Atkins as an odd man.

    The most amazing scientists of all times believed in God.

    Even Isaac Newton he died in unhappiness telling that I felt empty, because he needed God to fill this emptyness.

  • @YetziroVenni over half of scientists are atheists, the harder the science (math, chemistry, physics, biology) the more they are atheistic, as opposed to weak science (sociology, psychology...) as they are more likely to be believers... and THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, our top 2000 or so scientists has remained 90%+ atheistic for a long time... its almost a "rite of passage" to get it as has been said... so the smarter the less you believe, that really is the pattern... i've seen the stats

  • @YetziroVenni So? That's just one man's opinion.

  • @YetziroVenni Sir isaac Newton also thought metals had magical powers and could be combined to make gold. Pretty much everybody back then was religious or at least believed in a god, we know hell of a lot more than newton did back then. Einstein was an atheist, so was Darwin and so is Stephen Hawking. Goodbye Jesus.

  • what a nice little explanation, however he's never going to convince the poor creationist chumps with NO clue.

  • Peter Atkins give me the numbers how it posible it is!

  • This man is a more lucid and erudite expositor of biological evolution than even Richard Dawkins.

  • I think that perhaps they all have their moments, it perhaps depends a lot on which questions they are trying to answer and the audience being addressed.

    Something which makes Natural selection so compelling is it's simplicity and elegance, and yet it also applies to the whole of biology. Dawkins' work explores more controversial ground but quite legitimately, Natural selection describes how forms emerge from replicators, when conscious selection is not present.

  • @TeaDbluJay hmmm, interesting...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more