Added: 2 years ago
From: UnkownSoldier117
Views: 37,533
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (574)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Tu video esta malo... ok esta bien que derrive al SU-37 TERMINATOR de lejos... pero puede acabar con el SU-47 BERKUT A LO LEJOS?? JAJAJA esto es mentira... SUKHOI ahora tiene el poder de atacar 8 blancos enseguida asi sean (stealth) y pueden derrivar a su enemigo sin que este se de cuenta si no me crees mira el SU-35BM y al SU T-50 PAK FA esos si son los mejores cuentan con Irbis-E y atacan a 400KM y si es dogfither ya se sabe quein tiene la mejor maniobrabilidad que son los SUKHOIS manito abajo

  • jajaja este video esta mas malo que bueno pues jajaja... F-22 RAPTOR "El mejor luchador" y quien te dijo eso??? jajaja... los mejores luchadores son los SUKHOIS y eso en el mundo se sabe... luchador es cuando entran al dogfither y se sabe muy bien que el SUKHOI es mucho mas maniobrable que el F-22 por que el F-22 sea stealth no quiere decir que sea el mejor RUSIA en sus nuevos diseños de SUKHOI esta montandole el radar Irbis-E que puede detectar blancos (stealth) y atacar a 8 de estos...

  • F22 is amazing aircraft and it has some advantages over SU-37 (it's pretty) and it comes with 100K miles wing to wing warranty. For those who ignores specs on SU-37 that it's faster, more maneuverable, now equipped with two radars to detect F22 and controlled by the best pilots in the world, i have sad news for you. It's not available on US market :( lol

  • @ivinio21 Yes, F-22 has advantages over su37. First F-22 is Gen 5 Aircraft that has been produced and is combat capabile. Even deployed and in use. su37 is a failure, only 2 were built and one of them crashed. The other one sits broken in a hanger. ROFL!!! So funny! Hahahaha....:)

  • @eag11e You either a little kid or just typical uneducated person. Nov. 16, 2010, approximately 120 nautical miles northeast of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson you lost a n aircraft F-22 Raptor due to carbon monoxide entering the cockpit OBOGS (onboard oxygen generating system) Good thing pilot staid alive. Another aircraft you lost in Libya on Mar. 21. 2011. On Feb.11, a model of the U.S. stealthy RQ-170 drone captured on Dec4, 2011 by Iranians. I will say this this again, by Iranians... Think.

  • and Russian technology is much more advanced to Iranians. I'm not saying that F-22 is bad aircraft, but reality is, we (humans) american's russian's german's and other are the same and we always be building new and more sophisticated technology and one will be better than another till we build something better. But for people like you even iPhone 4 is better than SU-37. Thinking logically should be one of the first things, don't you think? don't bother to answer.

  • @ivinio21 Are you under the false impression that no russian fighter aircraft have ever crashed? LOL, so funny! Hahahahaha

  • @eag11e Where in my comment you see me pointing on russian aircraft never been crashed? Before you say that you're the best, check your facts....

  • Sure F22 is 'stealthy'. But there is one thing that is unavoidable. Any aircraft, including F22, that is traveling at supersonic speeds has its skin heated. And it gets REALLY hot.

    New IR based anti air weapons are capable of detecting this heat, including any supersonic Raptor going by. The B2 Spirit achieves a lot of its stealth via mission planning and superb instruments that detect radar radiation, and so it avoids radar, rather than being invisible to it. This might be the same for F22.

  • DEATH TO RUSSIA!

  • why people keep talking about cancelled and grounded planes like the ones in usa??? Su35 its faster, stronger, better and its made for dog fight....plus ita have 2 radar who detect stealth planes...when the fight was Su27 vs F15 was "even" ...but craptor its just a stealth interceptor besides Sukhoi fighters...and now MiG 29M OVT its superior too

  • @mauricioalfredo83 IF the su35 is as you say better, why does russia only have 15 of them?

  • @mauricioalfredo83 Ha, its Russian, and the only good thing Russia has made is the Ak-47.

  • @mauricioalfredo83 Your facts are ass backwards. If it was built primarily as an interceptor, then it it would have alot more speed than it does, and possibly less manuverability.

  • the raptor is already a unit in use...the russian model is still developing...and also the f-22 cost is 3 times the russian model...

  • :)

  • Cobra !!! Hold still. Thanks.

  • F-22 FTW!

  • line up all russian planes. f-22 will knock them all out of the sky.

  • @AngrySwampManStudios We do not know that yet, do we.

  • @AngrySwampManStudios lol, american education, not the strongest part, and you are the perfect example ;)

  • usaf

  • pakfa is best

  • Sukhoi's PAK FA T-50 beats the F22 in all aspects. I used to admire the F22 but then I realized that it's a failure, it even can fly in rain, need maintenance and minor reparation after each flight. Also the avionics and radar systems is inferior than T-50, it has longer ranges and is faster. The most amazing is that T-50 cost less than F22. :(

  • @irvinmanohar The only thing amazing about the pak fart50 is that it will be at least another 5 years before it can be put into production. OMG, by then it will be obsolete!

  • @irvinmanohar LOL, pak fart isn't even close to being produced. And, now with these engine problems........it pretty much is accepted all of it's performance specs will have to be downgraded. BTW did you see the great video coverage of the pakfart torching off and catching on fire.......on the ground. WOW, it reminds me of some guy trying to build a car in his garage with only pliers and a screw driver. Hahahaha, so funny.

  • @irvinmanohar Can't fly in rain

    watch?v=Jw2W_XlWkmQ

    maintenance

    watch?v=RgiThPPnIcY

  • The F-22 can't even fly in rain, let alone stand up to any current aircraft. It was shit in the 80's when it was designed, it's still shit today 30 years later.

  • @Bobisawesome100 Great, you go get into your mig 21, 31 or suckoi su27 or 35 and come fight me.  I will of course choose the F-22. And you will be scraping your eyeballs off of your shattered and melted windscreen as I fly by and flip you off. Can't wait!

  • @eag11e Try doing that in the rain lol

  • @Bobisawesome100 Hahahahaha great come back!

  • @eag11e thank you

  • F-22 Owns the sky.

  • SU-47 VS F-22R ? pretty cool ... X-02 VS F22R ?

  • and somthing more .... i thing if 1 army can buy su-37 and raptors too will be the most deadly in the air :P

  • i love suckhoi but russians have only the su-37 and su-35 and i thing are insude on the top jets but the f-22 raptor is stelth, is fast, have a lot of weapons and is good on air pak fa dont have weapons and is worse than su-35 and su-37 so i vote f-22 for the best stealth fighter jet ... and aboute chinas stealth i thing is stolen :/ is the same outside with f-22 but i thing again f-22 is beter

  • F-22 win's it in every way

  • Yeah, but can the Raptor perform Pugachev's famous "Cobra"....I think not.

  • @x0lamborghini0x  Yes, It can!....:)

  • @x0lamborghini0x Actually it can, and has. Also, the maneuver is really useless is air-air combat

  • 1 Billion in upgrades in 2011 :) bye bye old F-22 problems. :)

  • raptor vs. a lizard kind of stuff aye? hehehehe!

  • I think that both aircraft are deadly in a hands of a god pilot.

  • ace combat  6 the sukois are a pain to kill wish i had the raptor in that mission

  • ace combat 6 the sukois are a pain to kill wish i had the raptor in that mision

  • Great video,even though some additional lack of propaganda would make it even greater...still,very nice.

  • anti stealt:(OSF(rafale), PIRATE(ef-2000), Kols-MG(mig-35) , L-Band radar(t-50)) and Radar warning)) you can find an raptor if he uses his radar and if he doesnt use it you use your infrared system(osf etc.) or the L-Band radar (f22 hasn´t an infrared system or L-Band radar) sry for my bad english im german

  • @hall01000 you say pak fa has L band radar? What are it's parameters? To be effective, L Band has to be very large and use lots of power. what is the range of pak fa L band radar? you can see any aircraft that uses it's radar....What is the point? Does F-22 use heat masking? Sory 4 my bad English im Amerkin.

  • Comment removed

  • It took the rest of the world more than 30 years to get an aircraft that could compete with the F-15 variations. Even now that thing is one of the best fighters/multirole jets out there. All they did was upgrade the software, the F-15 can now go stealth.

    Just imagine what shit the yanks have that they are keeping under wraps.

  • F 22 is such a failed aircraft !! ... Not upto satisfaction... but looks are fuckin great.. Undoubtedly it looks so sexy !!

  • Perhaps it can hold its own against the Su-27..

    Not sure if it can survive against the Su-35.

  • @myquill23 Which of the 15 existing su35s do you think could challenge the F-22. Of the 15 existing su35s I understand that only about half of them are operational at any given moment. Wow. Now that is a real threat and a real impact on the old rusting russian air force. OMG....So funny.

  • Knoob? 0_o

  • =,O

  • ROfl COPTOR

  • all videos like this are basically traps for huge nationalistic shitstorms

  • @mongorians22 Tru dat.

  • Funny how people call the raptor the craptor when comparing it to SUCKhois...

  • Sorry My Friend, but who in Mother Europe will back an American Strike Against Mother Russia???

    Not even Israel...

    You're "Fresh Otta Friends" "But We Don"T Quit" M.C. Ren said "Start Some shit" "we gottashotgun, and here's the plot" smoke those dumbass yank with some BURGERKING BUCKSHOT, CAN'T GET OUT THE DOOR< COZ WE DON'T FIT" best bust the door down with some ghetto ass bulshit" fuck all your bitches and for a show, we leave you suckin on a soggy ass Oreo

  • @MiStErShItFiStEr LOL, it is the whole of Europe that lusts to attack what has become the frail, weak, backwards country, russia, full of slobvokians such as yourself. When USA says "Lets roll", believe me all of Europe will be tripping over itself to follow USA in attack on shitville rusky. LOL, you in russia with Chechyans, Georgians, and Eastern Europeans all hating you are concerned that Israel doesn't support USA...OMG, you are joking right? Pathetic rusky education.

  • @MiStErShItFiStEr ROFL, I see you a slobvokian have no creativity or knowledge, so you resort to quoting the American Black Man, MC Ren. OMG, you look foolish! But, anyone reading your post will immediately realize that he is vastly superior to a slobvokian such as yourself. So fucking funny...Hahaha

  • F-22 Craptor LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­L

  • @SoloPixy1 suckoi pak fart 50 LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOL

  • russian style = bandit style

    american style =finest style especially in aircraft design

  • russian style = bandit style

  • que pedo contigo cabron

  • F-22 would dominate against any Sukhoi jet !!!!!

  • F-22 is outdated it is a fact, the stealth was visible even for the mig-35, pak-fa for the F-22's death. youtube.com/watch?v=_VOFdXO929­Q&feature=related

  • The F-22 is still by far the most technologically advanced fighter jet used on current warfare. Stealth technology makes it near impossible to find on radar, which means engagement against one is limited to sight range, and with the AIM-120s that the Raptor carries, the chances of a dogfight even beginning are nil. You have to see it to know it's there, and the onboard radar system of the Raptor plus the AMRAAM's capabilities means B.V.R. engagement. To put it politely, goodbye Sukhois.

  • suckhoi? Hmm pak fart!

  • @eag11e gay hind!!!!

  • @M4DDYYYY Haha, you obama slim lauden lover. Take your homosex advances somewhere else. I am not like you. I fuck women, not little boys like you do. you see what USA does? paki says no the fag bin lauden is not here. The USA says fuck that shit and flies right over your military head quarters, and no one can do a damn thing about it. Then USA does as they want with the coward. When finished they throw him in ocean. OMG, when will they come for you. you are not safe.

  • de raptor is far better than de shitty fuckin sukhois. RAPTOR IS DE BEST IN DE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!! not craptor NOOO! RAPTOR

  • @f22raptorfication you are right about the f-22 being better than the sukhois, BUT the sukhois are way cheaper, easier to built and is far easier to handle, so in a dog fight (1 on 1) the f-22 is way better, but in numbers the sukhois would be superiour; its just the way you look at it :)

  • @doyouknowwho6 Actually, not only is the F-22 technically superior. But, the USA has more combat capable fighter aircraft than russia does. USA has 187 F-22s. russia only has 2 pak fat 50s. And they are being used for testing not combat capable. In addition the USAF has way more legacy fighters than russia does.

  • @eag11e i mean the older models, russia got countless planes that no one cares about now, but would be a nice extra in an aerial war.

  • @doyouknowwho6 Are you speaking of old mig29 and su27? What maybe 700 at most of which maybe 300 can actually be combat capable. LOL, USA has over 2000 legacy fighters of which all are combat capable.

  • @f22raptorfication No Craptor. There is no need to show the face of the Sukhoi because it is much more superior then thee Crapptor. My water hose would take that expensive winged turd down with ease. ty

  • @BusinessKi11ER craptor? Wow, like a little girl so clever. you copy what some fanboy, smarter than you writes. Pathetic. I see the jealousy in your post. you see in aussyland, you will never get to have a F-22 Raptor. you are not important enough to get them. So you instead will spend Billions of Dollars to buy stripped down F-35s...Hahahahaha, so fucking funny. you should be greatful to get them. Yes, I see the front line defense for assy is water hose. OMG..."man your hoses!"

  • @eag11e yeah wateva *shakes head* Keep fantasizing on your cancelled piece of shiat.

  • @BusinessKi11ER Oh, did you say something? Smegma breath.

  • @eag11e Yeh, for you... typical American to suck cock and grease balls. ya lil fatty

  • @BusinessKi11ER So pathetic for you to be a homosexual. Do not make your advances towards me. I fuck women. Not little boys like you. Go take your grease balls somewhere else, probably lot of fags in russia start there. But, keep away from me. I am not interested in your fag play.

  • @eag11e Haha pathetic to you, asshole. You just repeated what I said but in a longer form and the women you fuck were definately blind.

    I'm not a fan of damn ruskies. I'm just a fan of Sukhoi. It bothers me when you say shit about it. No-one can talk till their is a real dogfight between these both planes. Doubt that will happen too. So i'm gonna go now so troll all you like.

  • @BusinessKi11ER I am glad it bothers you when I post my comments. It bothers you because what I post is true, and it does not support your agenda. LOL, people like you provide much entertainment and humor for people like me. Yes, go away, be gone. I will bet you cannot help yourself from posting back to me. It is because of your weak mind.

  • Comment removed

  • @eag11e ;)

  • @BusinessKi11ER Hahaha, I knew it your ego would not let you stop posting to me. So funny, how I can manipulate you fanboys. It is because you have no discipline.

  • @eag11e haha all i did was a '';)'' and you take an advantage off that, sad boy. You can't manipulate jack shit buddy it's just your own mind screwing with you. 'F-22 is the best' what a joke. It's probably as good as the blind tranny women you fuck!?

  • @BusinessKi11ER So funny! I have gotten so far under your skin you cannot help yourself. you have to reply. It is your ego. People like you are wired this way, you literally cannot help yourself. you think you are in control, but you are not. Since you said "you were going to go now". you posted back to me 2 times. And you will reply to this post as well. you find yourself in that place between being pissed off, frustrated and yet feeling superior. In reality It is your weakness, lack of control

  • @eag11e your HELERAOUS. you sound like a useless psychologist( thinks you know what your talking about) but you don't. I never said "you were going to go now" so technically your wrong XD and also I feel superior because Obviously I am superior towards you :)

  • @BusinessKi11ER That is the irony of your psychosis. you feel superior, frustration, and anger. But the reality is that you are not superior. you are in fact, INFERIOR. It is your super ego trying to make sense of a situation in which you realize your own flaws. The funny thing is that you have once again responded to me. you cannot accept my analysis of you. you will continue to respond to my every post. your behavior is very predictable and it does indicate a flaw in your thought process.

  • @eag11e Okay fine next one to type something out to each other is a weak minded, tranny woman, and undisciplined loser that is a pedophile... kind of like eag11e. The Game Begins.

  • @pygame The MD F-22 has thrust vectoring as well, I hear it can theoretically hover like a helicopter and maintain control over pitch and roll.

  • @Drift91King

    F-22 has only 2d thrust vectoring. All Russian plane have 3d.

  • @natsplit you need to go read a book kid. you will find that the 2D TV is far superior to the 3D vectoring. Look at the throw value for each. 2D is around 30 degrees. 3D is only around 16 degrees. 2D provides vectoring in the 2 axis that count and are used in combat. Pitch and Roll. Vectoring in yaw is not necessary. Plus, 2D Nozzle has stealth characteristics. Educate yourself so you do not look foolish when you post here.

  • @eag11e

    Still there is nothing wrong with my comment.

  • @natsplit Yes, your statement is incorrect. you say all russian planes have 3D thrust vectoring. That is a bold faced lie. Not all russian planes have thrust vectoring. In fact most don't. your statement is totally incorrect. Oh, and BTW I just read article in russian defense pubs. It states sukhoi is now looking at upgrading pak fa in future by......you guessed it.....putting a 2D nozzel similar to F-22 nozzel on engines. LOL, now that is funny!

  • @eag11e

    You really want to start a flame war, do you?

    Because your comment is bullshit too. The F22 has only 20°deg of vectoring not 30° as you stated.

    The 3d thrust vectoring of the suchoi is 16deg in vertical axis BUT 32 degrees horizontally.

    And as you said. The horizontal axis is the more important one.

  • @natsplit Flame war? Haha I could care less. Type bullshit to me and you will have one! Yes, I misspoke about 30 degrees. It is 20 degree deflection for F-22. The 3d vectoring is however published to be 15 degrees. The nozzles are offset by 32 degrees in the horizontal plane. but that is not their deflection rather their placement. The 3d nozzle deflection is 15 degrees. A full 5 degrees less than the F-22. So my point is still valid. And, yes sukhoi is thinking of upgrading to 2d nozzel.

  • @eag11e

    You wikipedia information might be wrong. From the official website of the Indian air force:

    "The Su-30MKI has two Al 31FP Turbofan engines, each of which has 29400 pounds of full afterburner thrust. These engines have thrust vectoring nozzles that can deflect 32 degrees horizontally and 15 degrees vertically, which can produce a corkscrew effect that enhances maneuverability. The engines have a MTBO of about 1000 hours. The TV nozzles have MTBO of about 250 hours."

  • @natsplit I see the article you are referring to, yet if you go to Saturns official web site you will see they state the nozzles only move 15 degrees. maybe they are adding the deflection of the 2 engines. In either case, it does not matter because the 2D nozzle provides pitch(both nozzles deflecting in same direction). 2D provides roll(each nozzle deflecting in opposite directions). And differential engine thrust plus large vertical rudders on F-22 provide yaw control. TV is not needed for yaw.

  • @eag11e

    Didn't find any information on saturns website. They only post some general facts about that engine there.

  • @natsplit Yes, it appears the saturn web site has limited info now. This may help: The thrust vectoring engines on some Su-30 variants have nozzles with turn axes positioned at 32-deg angle to each other. The differential ±15-degree deflection of the engines' asymmetric nozzles enables pitch/yaw thrust vectoring control. Depending on the manoeuvre to be performed, nozzles deflections can be synchronised with or differ from the deflections of horizontal tail planes.

  • @natsplit I doubt the Sukhois have 30 degrees of vectoring like I saw on the raptor in this video.

  • @Drift91King

    Did i say that?

  • @natsplit No, but I'd rather have 30 degrees of roll and pitch vectoring than say 10 degrees of yaw vectoring. I should mention I have some civilian flight experience combined with some basic knowledge of dogfighting.

  • @Drift91King

    Than you should know that the F22 only has 20 deg...

  • @natsplit 30 was just an estimate based off what I saw in the video. Didn't actually take the time to look up the specs. My point is that the Raptor has far more vectoring than any other fighter I've seen.

  • @f22raptorfication

    good one

  • @f22raptorfication The level of retardation in your comment is so high you don't even deserve an opinion.

  • "eag11e " its troll

  • Raptor? Hmm Craptor!

  • Sukhoi! Hmm Suck Boy!

  • @eag11e Hay !you have no need to jump out of your pram actually DO know what i'm talking about ,Not every thing American is shit hot,So pull your head on pal before some some one treads on it. You seem to have a lot to say big man but you say NOTHING.

  • There is a lot of sour grapes going on here !The f55 areal piece of hard ware at the moment not much to touch it ,But the su 47 and the flanker can more than look after it's self as you big guys in the USA will find out if you ever go up against them.

  • @Taildragger2411 Why do you post things you do not understand? Do you realize sukhoi only built one su47? Do you realize it was never equipped for combat, only testing. su47 was never put into production! The old flanker is a gen 4 legacy fighter. F-15, F-16, and F-18 are more than a match for it. All of these aircraft are flying all over sky in mid east. Why does russia not fly it's flanker against American legacy fighters? Because, it can't!

  • once we start mass production of the F-35 Russia will be jealous

  • i don't think "anyone" knows what the fark they're talking about, but thats half the fun of this place, the bullshit

    stupid video by the way

  • I love waking up and watching all the vids on youtube about how the raptor sucks or the "truth" about Raptor, then i look in there profile and thier Country is Russia, Slovenia, Serbia, UK, India, China.....Then i say LMFAO.Damn foreign expert U.S.A.F Engineers. (XD)

  • I knew about the theories about inducing plasma ahead of the aircraft with the end of reducing drag and increasing speed but never heard about the stealth properties of plasma, I imagine that the electric nature of plasma could interfere with the radio signals from radar but the disturbance caused by so much electric activity could be detected by itself. Is there some study about it?

  • SHIT F 22 --C-400 POWER & MIG 35 

  • @Natali88333 you got it backwards!

  • that is out of the question, my point is to determine in a close range dogfight one to one with well trained pilots (same skill level) which has the advantage? and I wouldn´t match the F22 to the old SU27 I would do that with the new T50. That would be really interesting dogfight

  • @Nefariusi Yes, you see su27-su37 at air show doing stall maneuvers, which they do very well. This is low speed maneuverability. At high speed the same aircraft su27-su37 have poor maneuverability. LOL, you do not see this at the air show. This is one reason pak fa is a departure from basic airframe plan of su27. Problem with su27 family is to much tail lift. Typical dogfight: Long range radar detection, maneuver at high speed for advantage, get into missile range, lock on and fire (cont)

  • @eag11e Of course, this lock on gives away your position. But, if all goes well missiles will be impacting enemy before he can react. If this does not work, then planes continue to maneuver as they merge. Still at high speed but bleeding speed as they seek advantage. Short range missiles employed, and electronic counter measures, chaff, flares. If this fails, still speeding towards each other for merge. Planes merge using cannons and tactics. Maybe friendly plane in trail is now engaging...:)

  • at high speeds any aircraft looses maneuverability cause of the high Gs (even if the plane can take it the pilot can´t). Hi tail lift will result in high vertical stability but vector thrust and setting the hinge next to the aerodynamic center of the lifting surface would solve the problem easily. Anyway super-maneuverability I believe it would only be useful at the end of high energy consuming maneuvers. Crossing the plane at 300 knots would tear it apart

  • @Nefariusi Yeh, the canards on the su37 were an attempt to fix this aft CL problem of su27. But, they caused other problems. Notice they removed canards from production su35. Canards on su37 were a bandaid fix that didn't play out. pak fat50 does not employ canards, but has similar plane form as F-22. However, pakfat50 uses moveable lerxes above intakes. Agian, I believe this is a bandaid fix for an aerodynamic problem. Because the lerxes pretty much make the plane non-stealth.

  • the radar cross section from behind might have been compromised by the vector thrust system I don´t know about the thermal track on the T50 (I know they design F22´s nozzles to minimize thermal track) but it must still be pretty agile in close combat and hard to get in a radar. Remember Russians dominated super-maneuverability long before the US and they are the best in the world in Aerodynamics (I have studied a lot of Aerodynamics in my career) so I think the T50 must have good characteristics

  • @Nefariusi Oh, of course don't get me wrong. The T50 I'm sure will have fantastic characteristics. I was just pointing out some things i had noticed. But, yes Sukhoi and Russia would not be investing in T50 if they felt it would not be a winner. Plus allot of knowledge was gained from su37 and su47 airframes that have been incorporated into the T-50. I do like the weapons bay in between the engines, allot of pluses there. The only draw back would be that it would hurt IR signature. (cont)

  • @eag11e But, I read that a follow on nozzle is being looked at, that would address stealth and IR. So I think a great effort is being made, and it will pay off.

  • @eag11e interesting, I wonder how they will solve that huge exhaust without sacrificing the 360 vector capability or the thrust. I´m interested in adding feedback about the T50, Do you have any RSS or particular place this deal can be followed particularly?

  • @Nefariusi I read allot from different sources, most information on internet is biased one way or other. It is best to read Defense Publications, both Russian and American. I read that a flat stealth 2D Nozzle will be tested for pak fa. Do not be caught in the misconception that 3D nozzle is better. It is not. 3D Nozzle has less throw than 2D Nozzle and of course is not stealth. I am interested in Plasma Stealth. I am not able to find much information, but I know tests have been done.

  • All of this is true, but that is the way you design Air Forces, small countries who can´t support such a mega-air force must rely more on the capabilities of the individual aircraft (and of course pilots skills) to increase pilots surviving chances and mission success, if we isolate the factors to only the fighters in question it´s the dogfight that defines the better aircraft (and pilot which makes it even harder to finally tell about the aircraft) in air-forces none can match the US

  • I was hopping to see the dogfight, F22 firing missiles is no dogfight

  • @Nefariusi LOL, maybe you should go get into a sukhoi and fly up high and see this dogfight first hand. Watch this missile come quickly right at you. Watch the blinding light as it explodes, feel the heat of the fireball of which you are a part, watch for brief second as your body flies apart and splatters everywhere. Yes, I would like to see you in a dogfight with the Mighty F-22 Raptor.....:)

  • @eag11e the mighty of the F22... ok, first I´m not questioning the aircraft or your postulate about it being better than a SU 27 or an experimental Berkut, to do that you need to make an extensive study to get the N-V charts and at least the iso-Energy-Altitude vs V to get an idea of which one is really better (that I´m sure you not only didn´t make them but also you wouldn´t know how to). I´m just saying... where is the dogfight???

  • @Nefariusi I in fact did work on the development of F-22 Avionics....:) Again, I would like to see you in a dogfight with an F-22. So yes, I ask you when are you going to do it? ROFL, we both know that will never happen, because you like to see other people fight, but you yourself do not have the balls to do it! "I'm just saying...."

  • @eag11e I don´t love about youtube´s people taking any comment as some sort of aggression and responding on that way and specially speaking bullshit like that... you in the F22 Raptor avionics?? my God that is hilarious, what did you do fasten the screws?? Don´t insult people´s intelligence, if you were really part of such a program you wouldn´t be posting it here out loud, and yet you couldn´t tell wich aircraft is better WHERE IS THE DOGFIGHT??

  • @Nefariusi Yes, I know it is hard for you, because you have accomplished nothing in your pathetic life, to believe someone else has worked hard and accomplished many things. To be specific, I worked on the "ring laser gyro" imu. Not that you would have any idea what that even is or what it does. And, I have clearly stated that the F-22 is at least ten years ahead of anything that sukhoi has ever produced. As far as a Dogfight goes. You don't have the balls for it. So you will never see one!

  • @eag11e interesting, wouldn´t that be part of the gyroscopic system of the aircraft that instead of being mechanic is laser? that only makes you a simple (so far) electronic technician which means I was right, you only fastened the screws of the F22´s gyro, nice life and great accomplishments that of yours. And that also means you can´t perform the flight envelope curve and Energy--Altitude curve of the aircraft, so ask your friends with a real career as Aeronautic Engineers to do it for you

  • @eag11e PS: remember you´r the asshole who started fighting about nothing, all I did was ask for the dogfight you promised in the tittle. You want to talk well about aircraft? I´m passionate about fighters and we could do this in a civilized friendly way when you decide to cool it down

  • @Nefariusi "asshole" LOL, you cannot help yourself from name calling. You describe yourself very well. Wow, I see you used wiki to look up laser gyro. But, still you have no idea what it does. This is very humorous to me. My work in this capacity was as a USAF Officer several years ago. No I am not an Aeronautical Engineer. I am however, an Electronic Engineer, thank you.I have worked over 30 years in aviation.If you want meaningful response from me, do not call me an asshole.

  • @eag11e I don´t look for stuff in the wiki, it just sucks when it comes to real knowledge, I learned about aircraft electronic systems in the specific subject it is in the aeronautical engineering career. And yes I want meaningful response from you but you reacted bad to my question. I really wonder about the outcome of a dogfight between an F22 and a Su27 (not say a Berkut or T50). Missiles efficiency will be worse due to stealth technology forcing the dogfight.