ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
BURDEN OF PROOF: Atheists claim we’re here by chance. They have the burden of proof. What if you discovered a sand castle on a beach but you didn't see anyone make it,, and there are no fingerprints (maybe the wind blew them away?), but if you say the sand castle happened by chance forces of wind and waves, you have the burden of proof.. The person who believes someone made it doesn’t have the burden of proof. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
He fails. But yes, it's obvious what he's claiming: He's saying that his face (or the face of a human being) is proof in itself of intelligent design. He's trolling of course to show his fellow fundies that atheists "just don't get it".
What you dont see is all the shit nephilimfree sees when he's just staring at the camera. If you could see all the aliens and angels and monsters and demons and shit that he sees during those two minutes, you'd believe too.
If God created you why would he make you bald, with poor eyesight and a pedophiles moustache? If God watches all of us from his imaginary land don't you think he would have good eyesight so he can see everything we do? hahahaha
Whenever Neph says he speaks on behalf of God, and then comes out with reams of ignorant twaddle, it just confirms that his deity is entirely illusory. Why doesn't his God ever correct his errors?
He is himself the proof that his claims are false.
I think he meant for everyone to receive a message by telepathy, using his enormous brainm but all everyone got was the creeps, why does this fool even bother to do vidsm each time he just makes himself look more and more idiotic.
I'm convinced! I'm converted! Nephistofeles has won me over! His example is superb. An overweight, bleak, balding man, living in a trailer with the curtains closed, who knows that the best way to spend his time is to silently stare at a web cam for two minutes. That's a definite sign that atheism, materialism, evolution and humanism are false. Praise Satan!
Oh, it's the old "Look at the trees!" argument for the existence of God. Eesh!
He could have shown anything... a tree, a flower, a cat, a cute little baby... anything works for this argument (which is why this argument doesn't work!). But what does he show? His own amazing face!
Funny... The day before he posted this vid, he was all over YouTube replying to comments about him, saying, "See? I'm not smug! I'm not arrogant! Do you see?? Not smug!! Do you see how humble I am??"
Atheists deny things when they don't even know what it is they're denying.
They simply ignore him because of what he is, regardless of whether there is anything in reality which mimics the biblical idea of God.
God IS truth, the truth IS all powerful. The simple truth of the truth being all powerful proves pretty much the biblical definition of God. God is invisible, everywhere and all powerful. Reality is invisible, everywhere and all powerful. "I am that I am"
You're denying that the truth is all powerful, aka you're proving that you're very confused. The very "truth" of your denial doesn't have any authority according to your very own words.
Care to provide a single speck of evidence for a billion year old universe? Didn't think so. I think you need to balance your trust ratio, scientists are no less likely to lie and conspiratise than anybody else.
@TheColaGoodfellow A MOUNTAIN of evidence for a very old (~13.7B) universe DOES EXIST, from hundreds of years of empirical science. 99.99% of all legitimately-credentialed scientists on the planet agree. Your supernatural creationist claims are what STILL lack ANY evidence. You want a speck of evidence for an old universe? How about all the fossil, genetic, & archaologic evidence? Do you take all the readers here for fools? Go get an education, moron, you're embarrassing yourself.
I'll prove the bible is true when you prove that to be true. Until then I'll leave you with your blind faith.
The Bible is as much evidence as your claim is, infact the bible contains a much longer length of empirical evidence than science has. The Bible was experienced over the course of 1500 years, science has only been around for a few hundred.
@Cola So you're unwilling to provide any evidence in support of the Bible's supernatural claims unless I prove that we have hundreds of years of science supporting evolution? Gee, fitting all that into 500 characters should be a snap! Don't make my job too easy now!
Seriously, I can't educate an utterly ignorant like you in only a few words. I referred you to a channel with great evolution vids. U refuse to look, and ask the impossible before you will give evidence for your magic beliefs??!!!
@TheAnniepies i cannot be eternal all things have cause (newton) they deny the very instant that their pain would cease because of the body of the heat around it space is full of cheaters it has existed for decades you see i don't do homework for atheists atheists constantly ask creationists for sources constantly because: 1) evolutionists are as real as the universe but in reference to the evil men do you are
@stephenacts2220 Your profile says you are 17. Don't they teach you how to start and end a sentence by grade 12? Seriously, you are incoherent and come off as mentally challenged. Go finish your education and learn what critical thinking is before you try to make an argument. You are embarrassing yourself.
@TheAnniepies adam - man (mankind) seth - is appointed a mortal man (of) (mortal/frail man) kenan - sorrow (wailing chant) mahalalel - the various breeds of dog there is no mechanism for evolutionary change life would exist the earth's oceans would be moving at that time :d
@TheColafellow Still waiting for your eveidence for creation. ANY evidence at all....
As for your claim that "The very "truth" of your denial doesn't have any authority according to your very own words"--What the heck does that mean? Can't you speak coherently? Were you home schooled?
And scientists ARE less likely to make up bullshit than Joe Average. Their livelihood depends on their credibility and consistency with the scientific method.
Do you always believe shit? Where's your self-respect?
Haha, If I did get more education I definatly wouldn't want it from you.
I'll prove the Bible when you prove that there is any evidence atall for a billion year old universe atall. Carbon dating can be manipulate in a lab, if the bible is too old to be counted as reliable then anything saying the universe is billions of years old is definatly not reliable. Sorry for not being as gullible as you are.
@TheColaGoodfellow Evidence for a billion year old universe? Look at the night sky. Using Radio telescopes we see object up to 13 bn light years away. Simple proof in one sentence, if you want more I can enlighten you further.
@TheColaGoodfellow Regarding radiometric dating, we cannot influence the speed of radioactive decay. Carbon is a commonly used isotope to identify the age of organisms but it gets sketchy after a few tens of thousands of years. There are many other isotopes we use to give us a more accurate idea of how old something is.
@TheColaGoodfellow "Haha, If I did get more education I definatly wouldn't want it from you"
Yes.better to get your facts from Nephy...who has NO education...and is so unqualified to do anything he has been unemployed for 4 years.
"Carbon dating can be manipulate in a lab"
Are you claiming that these labs are in some conspiracy? Are you aware that radiometric dating is done by different labs...using different methods..and they cross check results for accuracy?
@MrJmm999 I think he's a troll, check his profile. His profile does not compute with linguistics law, normally this would pertain to plilology. So phuk 'em!
p.s. Yes, I've posted a comment like this before! ;)
@TheColaGoodfellow For the love of the Good Lord in Holy High Heaven, STOP SPAMMING my video pages.
These comments sections are for discussion relevant to the video. If you want to talk about your issues, then make your own video and fill up your own comments section.
Besides, you make Christian look like idiots. Please stop.
Because atheism, evolution, materialism and humanism have nothing to do with what I've commented? If i can't comment on atheism and evolution, you shouldn't have put it as a tag for your video.
If you refuse to give one collection of claims (the Bible) equal treatment to other sources of information ("Science", and those who claim to have heard from it), then it is you who is making yourself look like an idiot.
did he really sit there and do nothing for most of the video, because i got to say, WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THIS GUY, show us the damn proof, you sitting in front of a camera is only proof you are unwilling to find a job, and that you look at porn all day, ok doesn't prove he looks at porn, but yeah unwilling to get a job, what a lazy bum
Is Nephy himself the proof of a omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent being? I don't think I would give God a passing grade on his Nephy creation.
@happyjesus123 the design is why the earth like the accretion disk theiory in astonomy we see when we enter eternal life it is a person when they wrote it down they were sixty?? you just wanted to complain let's give you some help science demonstrates the bible yourself or even using the names and the universe is billions of yrs old evenso was formulated as modern theory in the lake of fire pay for their sins
@happyjesus123 it cannot be true since we know them the pressure upon the presumption that all life is designed how do you get to see none to say there is evidence of evolution it is teporary because it is in denial of god i am he that hath an ear let him have an atheist possibly do together in the sense of how genetic change is the opposite of his life that might take a look around yt and millions of people
Wait I don't get it. It looks like that was proof the evolution can sometimes produce individuals that are far far weaker than that of the surviving and reproducing group within a species. He missed the part where some "supreme being" had to tattoo a special message on his forehead or something. This guy obviously hasn't seen the original Omen.
@kronokronic christians do not believe in and admit it to explain why galaxies could have done? excuse me pilate hater of jews could you know what you mention is in error
ThisClownis2in1, well, considering he claimed Dr Dawkins was stumped over a much shorter pause, I would have to agree. NF attempted to think of proof and was entirely stumped.
Fucking creepy.
JarethGT 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
INTELLIGENT DESIGN ON ANOTHER PLANET? Imagine finding a planet where robots are programmed to make other robots just like themselves from raw materials. Now, imagine an alien scientist visiting the planet and, after studying these robots, comes to the conclusion that because science can explain how these robots work, function, and reproduce there's no reason to believe there was an intelligent designer behind them! Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Atheists claim we’re here by chance. They have the burden of proof. What if you discovered a sand castle on a beach but you didn't see anyone make it,, and there are no fingerprints (maybe the wind blew them away?), but if you say the sand castle happened by chance forces of wind and waves, you have the burden of proof.. The person who believes someone made it doesn’t have the burden of proof. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
He fails. But yes, it's obvious what he's claiming: He's saying that his face (or the face of a human being) is proof in itself of intelligent design. He's trolling of course to show his fellow fundies that atheists "just don't get it".
Sure we get it. It's just crap, that's all.
pburto 6 months ago
What you dont see is all the shit nephilimfree sees when he's just staring at the camera. If you could see all the aliens and angels and monsters and demons and shit that he sees during those two minutes, you'd believe too.
htomerif 7 months ago
@htomerif LMFAO awesome.
TatsujinSan 6 months ago
The fat bitch failed.
Drgamedood 7 months ago
so no proof then
Whaloroth 7 months ago
What the creepy pedo stare was that?
I feel like I've been raped...
That guy is C-R-E-E-P-Y!
Zentz29 1 year ago
I WILL STARE AT YOU UNTIL YOU BELIEVE ME
Darknessfalls32 1 year ago
@Darknessfalls32 Momma always said that's the best way to win an argument.
TatsujinSan 6 months ago
If God created you why would he make you bald, with poor eyesight and a pedophiles moustache? If God watches all of us from his imaginary land don't you think he would have good eyesight so he can see everything we do? hahahaha
ReelBigFish2492 1 year ago
Fail
Samurailord 1 year ago
what in the FUCK is this supposed to be?
culvre 1 year ago
@culvre The John Cage version of the "Look at the Trees" argument.
beakeclipse 1 year ago 2
This man is so clearly insane it saddens me. I hope he seeks some help soon.
lfcscouser2010 1 year ago
the thing is, this is longer than two minutes... he's editted this down you can see some transitions.... how long did he sit there for then? 0_o
KillaNinja0 1 year ago
I think he forgot what he was going to say, it happens to the best and worst of us...
daemonowner 1 year ago 2
Whenever Neph says he speaks on behalf of God, and then comes out with reams of ignorant twaddle, it just confirms that his deity is entirely illusory. Why doesn't his God ever correct his errors?
He is himself the proof that his claims are false.
BinkyHuckleback 1 year ago
No shit, his eyes followed me around the room
arealisticone 1 year ago
I think he meant for everyone to receive a message by telepathy, using his enormous brainm but all everyone got was the creeps, why does this fool even bother to do vidsm each time he just makes himself look more and more idiotic.
arealisticone 1 year ago
watch carefully on my camera screen?
arealisticone 1 year ago 2
i like how neph blocks people who doubt him so they can't prove him wrong.
33nbj 1 year ago
like 2 minutes of starring at a pedo lookalike is proof he could of justt said i am proof and saved 287 peoples120 seconds each
robthesamplist 1 year ago
I think God needs a better spokesperson!
dprjones 1 year ago 2
I'm convinced! I'm converted! Nephistofeles has won me over! His example is superb. An overweight, bleak, balding man, living in a trailer with the curtains closed, who knows that the best way to spend his time is to silently stare at a web cam for two minutes. That's a definite sign that atheism, materialism, evolution and humanism are false. Praise Satan!
youneac 1 year ago
I was tempted to flag this an inappropriate, I feel violated from his pedogaze...
EricEisenmenger 1 year ago
i think he is trying to tell us that he isn't human..
thedayitriedtodie 1 year ago
I really don't get this video. I just watched 2 minutes of pedo-stache staring at me. I feel violated.
zudthespud 1 year ago 20
@zudthespud Nephy started thinking about escorts in stockings & forgot what he was going to say.
TheAnniepies 1 year ago
It's hilarious that Nephie presents HIMSELF as evidence of God's divine design. A pasty-faced, crooked-toothed, homely, balding, tubby, visually-impaired, odious dimwit.
Behold the majesty of God's creation!!!
TheAnniepies 1 year ago 2
I think he and Chris Hansen will meet within the next couple of months!
DutchLiam84 1 year ago
I don't like him staring at me for that long. It's frigging creepy.
Breezewontspeak 1 year ago
Oh, it's the old "Look at the trees!" argument for the existence of God. Eesh!
He could have shown anything... a tree, a flower, a cat, a cute little baby... anything works for this argument (which is why this argument doesn't work!). But what does he show? His own amazing face!
Funny... The day before he posted this vid, he was all over YouTube replying to comments about him, saying, "See? I'm not smug! I'm not arrogant! Do you see?? Not smug!! Do you see how humble I am??"
TheHogTieChamp 1 year ago
@TheHogTieChamp
Atheists deny things when they don't even know what it is they're denying.
They simply ignore him because of what he is, regardless of whether there is anything in reality which mimics the biblical idea of God.
God IS truth, the truth IS all powerful. The simple truth of the truth being all powerful proves pretty much the biblical definition of God. God is invisible, everywhere and all powerful. Reality is invisible, everywhere and all powerful. "I am that I am"
TheColaGoodfellow 1 year ago
@TheColaGoodfellow Care to provide a SINGLE speck of evidence for your supernatural claims? .....
Didn't think so.
TheAnniepies 1 year ago
@TheAnniepies
I don't think you understand what you're denying.
You're denying that the truth is all powerful, aka you're proving that you're very confused. The very "truth" of your denial doesn't have any authority according to your very own words.
Care to provide a single speck of evidence for a billion year old universe? Didn't think so. I think you need to balance your trust ratio, scientists are no less likely to lie and conspiratise than anybody else.
TheColaGoodfellow 1 year ago
@TheColaGoodfellow A MOUNTAIN of evidence for a very old (~13.7B) universe DOES EXIST, from hundreds of years of empirical science. 99.99% of all legitimately-credentialed scientists on the planet agree. Your supernatural creationist claims are what STILL lack ANY evidence. You want a speck of evidence for an old universe? How about all the fossil, genetic, & archaologic evidence? Do you take all the readers here for fools? Go get an education, moron, you're embarrassing yourself.
TheAnniepies 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheAnniepies
"...from hundreds of years of empirical science"
I'll prove the bible is true when you prove that to be true. Until then I'll leave you with your blind faith.
The Bible is as much evidence as your claim is, infact the bible contains a much longer length of empirical evidence than science has. The Bible was experienced over the course of 1500 years, science has only been around for a few hundred.
TheColaGoodfellow 1 year ago
@Cola So you're unwilling to provide any evidence in support of the Bible's supernatural claims unless I prove that we have hundreds of years of science supporting evolution? Gee, fitting all that into 500 characters should be a snap! Don't make my job too easy now!
Seriously, I can't educate an utterly ignorant like you in only a few words. I referred you to a channel with great evolution vids. U refuse to look, and ask the impossible before you will give evidence for your magic beliefs??!!!
TheAnniepies 1 year ago
@TheAnniepies i cannot be eternal all things have cause (newton) they deny the very instant that their pain would cease because of the body of the heat around it space is full of cheaters it has existed for decades you see i don't do homework for atheists atheists constantly ask creationists for sources constantly because: 1) evolutionists are as real as the universe but in reference to the evil men do you are
stephenacts2220 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stephenacts2220 Your profile says you are 17. Don't they teach you how to start and end a sentence by grade 12? Seriously, you are incoherent and come off as mentally challenged. Go finish your education and learn what critical thinking is before you try to make an argument. You are embarrassing yourself.
TheAnniepies 1 year ago
@TheAnniepies adam - man (mankind) seth - is appointed a mortal man (of) (mortal/frail man) kenan - sorrow (wailing chant) mahalalel - the various breeds of dog there is no mechanism for evolutionary change life would exist the earth's oceans would be moving at that time :d
stephenacts2220 1 year ago
@TheColafellow Still waiting for your eveidence for creation. ANY evidence at all....
As for your claim that "The very "truth" of your denial doesn't have any authority according to your very own words"--What the heck does that mean? Can't you speak coherently? Were you home schooled?
And scientists ARE less likely to make up bullshit than Joe Average. Their livelihood depends on their credibility and consistency with the scientific method.
Do you always believe shit? Where's your self-respect?
TheAnniepies 1 year ago
@TheAnniepies
Haha, If I did get more education I definatly wouldn't want it from you.
I'll prove the Bible when you prove that there is any evidence atall for a billion year old universe atall. Carbon dating can be manipulate in a lab, if the bible is too old to be counted as reliable then anything saying the universe is billions of years old is definatly not reliable. Sorry for not being as gullible as you are.
You're jhust angry because you know I'm right.
TheColaGoodfellow 1 year ago
@TheColaGoodfellow Evidence for a billion year old universe? Look at the night sky. Using Radio telescopes we see object up to 13 bn light years away. Simple proof in one sentence, if you want more I can enlighten you further.
zudthespud 1 year ago
@TheColaGoodfellow Regarding radiometric dating, we cannot influence the speed of radioactive decay. Carbon is a commonly used isotope to identify the age of organisms but it gets sketchy after a few tens of thousands of years. There are many other isotopes we use to give us a more accurate idea of how old something is.
zudthespud 1 year ago
@TheColafellow
Holy shit, you really ARE that dumb! Stop the presses--I've found a living missing link!
1. When you suggest that your opponent is ignorant, it really hurts your case when you reply with several spelling & grammar errors.
2. I already described the evidence. If you ACTUALLY want the truth, see a channel like WhyEvolutionisTrue.
3. I never said the Bible lacks cred due to it's age. It's because there is ZERO supporting evidence for it's supernatural claims.
3. Angry? ->strawman!
TheAnniepies 1 year ago
@TheAnniepies
it's = it is
its = of it
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
youneac 1 year ago
@TheColaGoodfellow "Haha, If I did get more education I definatly wouldn't want it from you"
Yes.better to get your facts from Nephy...who has NO education...and is so unqualified to do anything he has been unemployed for 4 years.
"Carbon dating can be manipulate in a lab"
Are you claiming that these labs are in some conspiracy? Are you aware that radiometric dating is done by different labs...using different methods..and they cross check results for accuracy?
What is YOUR dating method?
MrJmm999 1 year ago
@MrJmm999 I think he's a troll, check his profile. His profile does not compute with linguistics law, normally this would pertain to plilology. So phuk 'em!
p.s. Yes, I've posted a comment like this before! ;)
DutchLiam84 1 year ago
@TheColaGoodfellow Blah, blah, blah, blah...
Normally, I would tolerate your inane religious blather. Instead, I encourage you to go fuck yourself for these two reasons:
(1) Your comment had literally NOTHING to do with what I had posted. Seriously, why did you even bother typing that tripe in reply to me??
(2) Your comment is another tired, old "I know how you think better than you do" sanctimonious crap that we've all heard a thousand times.
If you wish to "save" anyone, get new material.
TheHogTieChamp 1 year ago
@TheColaGoodfellow For the love of the Good Lord in Holy High Heaven, STOP SPAMMING my video pages.
These comments sections are for discussion relevant to the video. If you want to talk about your issues, then make your own video and fill up your own comments section.
Besides, you make Christian look like idiots. Please stop.
NephilimFreeFree 1 year ago
@NephilimFreeFree
Because atheism, evolution, materialism and humanism have nothing to do with what I've commented? If i can't comment on atheism and evolution, you shouldn't have put it as a tag for your video.
If you refuse to give one collection of claims (the Bible) equal treatment to other sources of information ("Science", and those who claim to have heard from it), then it is you who is making yourself look like an idiot.
TheColaGoodfellow 1 year ago
nephy is stoned on his roommates meds. no doubt in my mind.
peace, lardo.
lardo444 1 year ago
That is just creepy
thequantumflux 1 year ago
well, that's unimaginable intelligence right thar.
Swamoez0rs 1 year ago
This is possibly the Nephilimfree video that misunderstands, breaks, denies or misapplies the fewest scientific principles ever!
BiggusRobbicus 1 year ago
empirical evidence?
Ryoka242 1 year ago
brain fart!?
Belthazor771 1 year ago
A better argument aginst Intelligent Design or any design i have yet to see.
pilgrimpater 1 year ago
Didn't think about it much but that guy proves evolution for sure.
AEVautomatic 1 year ago
Nephy should get back to what he's good at which is prolly being a serial (rapist, paedophile, murderer) tick appropriate description/s.
Zed1967 1 year ago
did he really sit there and do nothing for most of the video, because i got to say, WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THIS GUY, show us the damn proof, you sitting in front of a camera is only proof you are unwilling to find a job, and that you look at porn all day, ok doesn't prove he looks at porn, but yeah unwilling to get a job, what a lazy bum
wayneqjr 1 year ago
Here's how this video happened; neph woke up, knocked back a fifth of Jim Beam, then get the retarded idea to make this video.
channeloffun1 1 year ago
oy vey
channeloffun1 1 year ago
Rearrange the words of stephenacts2220's post to form a meaningful argument. That's your challenge for today, class.
Misterb0z 1 year ago
Did I miss something??
mjh012363 1 year ago
Is Nephy himself the proof of a omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent being? I don't think I would give God a passing grade on his Nephy creation.
happyjesus123 1 year ago
@happyjesus123 the design is why the earth like the accretion disk theiory in astonomy we see when we enter eternal life it is a person when they wrote it down they were sixty?? you just wanted to complain let's give you some help science demonstrates the bible yourself or even using the names and the universe is billions of yrs old evenso was formulated as modern theory in the lake of fire pay for their sins
stephenacts2220 1 year ago
@stephenacts2220 So God is an aging unemployable pervert? Being made in the image of Nephy.
happyjesus123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@happyjesus123 it cannot be true since we know them the pressure upon the presumption that all life is designed how do you get to see none to say there is evidence of evolution it is teporary because it is in denial of god i am he that hath an ear let him have an atheist possibly do together in the sense of how genetic change is the opposite of his life that might take a look around yt and millions of people
stephenacts2220 1 year ago
I wish it was true would be interesting
AEVautomatic 1 year ago
That creepy stare is absolute 100% proof of a creator!
owchywawa 1 year ago
Hey if your gnosis turns you on man it true enough for you
hartejoseph 1 year ago
I wonder, if you get more sub's than nephilim, will he debate you?
eyallev 1 year ago
What a dickhead this guy is.
australianews 1 year ago
Wait I don't get it. It looks like that was proof the evolution can sometimes produce individuals that are far far weaker than that of the surviving and reproducing group within a species. He missed the part where some "supreme being" had to tattoo a special message on his forehead or something. This guy obviously hasn't seen the original Omen.
websnarf 1 year ago
TAKE THAT ATHEISTS! DID U SEE THAT! UNDENIABLE PROOF!
kronokronic 1 year ago
@kronokronic christians do not believe in and admit it to explain why galaxies could have done? excuse me pilate hater of jews could you know what you mention is in error
stephenacts2220 1 year ago
@stephenacts2220 Ur reply is too grammatically fucked up for me to understand. And im no grammar nazi, i just have no idea what ur trying to tell me.
kronokronic 1 year ago
I think this video sums up all of the christian apologist's arguments quite nicely.
Violent2aShadow 1 year ago
pretty sure he just proved there is no god
pointmanzero 1 year ago
This guy's cuckoo for coco. Wouldn't surprise me if one of these days we heard that he killed himself after murdering somebody else.
dioseolo 1 year ago
So he's admitting that there is no proof that atheism, materialism, "evolutionism", and humanism are false.
ThisClownis2in1 1 year ago
ThisClownis2in1, well, considering he claimed Dr Dawkins was stumped over a much shorter pause, I would have to agree. NF attempted to think of proof and was entirely stumped.
JustAnotherMutant 1 year ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@JustAnotherMutant I watched the video on his channel, and he claims that he is the proof.
ThisClownis2in1 1 year ago
This is an accurate video. Nephilimfree shutting the hell up shows he's intelligent enough to realize that he's a moron.
robertmike57 1 year ago
You know, I was expecting this to be a screamer video when I first saw it.
KinsmanCa 1 year ago