it's so unsafe that it got the highest safety rating by the IIHS & the NHTSA, and it's inefficient cause it only gets 32mpg the inline 4's are one of the most powerful it's class while the v6 does fall short by 50hp there better looking than the accord, camy , altima, and fusion and there very reliable
well okay, the new avenger sedan is an iihs top safety pick, but so is the accord (the camry sucks)
the 2.4L DOHC i4 in the sebring sedan produces 173 hp and gets 21/30 mpg while the accord's 2.4L i4 produces 192hp and gets 22/31 mpg
plus the accord's v6 has 36 hp more and gets 19/29 vs the sebring's 16/27. the accord has legendary reliability and even the camry is more reliable. styling is an opinion, but i think the new accord and fusion look fine. plus the new fusion hybrid kicks ass
Yeah the "2009" got a IIHS Top Safety Pick, while Ford and GM the past 2 years already had 16 and 8 Top Safety Picks.
2010 Fusion kicks ass on styling inside and out, high quality interior, excellent fit and finish. Very sporty handling and acceleration. Also one of the most fuel efficient vehicles in America. Runs circles around the Sebring and the Sebring's rear end is ugly as hell.
MPG: Fusion 4cyl 22/31, Hybrid 41/36 and people actually get this unlike Chrysler's exaggerated claims!
this is coming from someone that thinks Chryslers substandard garbage is great so I don't believe you. The Fusion's interior is way better quality than the Sebring or Avenger and the 2010 is even a lot better.
look I'm not saying that the sebring is the greatest car in the world all im saying is that it's not a terrible car and people shouldn't be the sebring so much crap all the time
plus the new fusion has been improved a LOT and is now considerably better than the sebring. the sebring also has a cheap ass interior and chrysler makes very unreliable vehicles, check out the channel dodgechryslersucks for proof
actually he's such a truth teller, his family actually almost bought a Chrysler before doing lots of researching and finding out the facts about Chrysler.
Not true, GM and Ford never had unsafe Gen3 Seatbelts that can unlatch in an accident in over 14 million 93-04 vehicles where they witnessed crash test dummies being ejected. Seats that collapse backward when driving in vehicles up to 2000, unsafe door latches where they had to duct tape doors in crash tests in some vehicles, substandard Fuel Rail and FI O-Rings that can cause engines to burst into flames in models up to 2000, no brakeshift where mothers were ran over, I could go on forever!
To continue, unsafe, defectively designed LH Platform Steering where drivers can suddenly lose control as inner tie rod bolts are known to snap and racks are known to go bad (93-'04 models), Balljoints prone to fail and snap off causing wheels to fly off on Durango and Dakota up to 2004. 2.7L Engine failures, timing chains snapping, coolant entering the crankcase, engines commonly consuming oil, seizing up at 60K while Chrysler blames the customer even when regular oil changes can be proven.
That's correct, the previous Fusion had a sense of cheapness (so does the Sebring and Avenger and they still have it) although it wasn't a bad vehicle but Ford really greatly improved everything from styling to even better quality components inside and out. I'd take one in a heartbeat over any Chrysler any day!
I was amazed by the cheapness of the Sebring's interior and toy like plastics, what makes it worse is that people can pay up to 35K for the Sebring Convertible!
It might not be necessarily "unsafe", however it did NOT get the highest IIHS rating, which is a top safety pick. In 2008 Chrysler had ZERO Top Safety Picks while Ford had 16 and GM had 8. Now in 2009 Chrysler "finally" has 2 big wooptyf'ndoo. The highest DOT NHTSA rating is very easy to achieve.
I was amazed at the cheapness of everything especially interior, loud buzzy engine 4cyls and did NOT get nearly as good MPG as claimed.
Plus one can spend up to over 35K on one of these POS!
This is a car at 45 degrees and they drive the barrier at 45 degrees meaning it is a perfectly calculated t-bone smack. Results mean NOTHING!
Drive another car into it at that 45 degree angle of the receiving car and let's see the real data when it FAILS!
There are three lies, "small, medium and statistics"
bxlxix69 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the 2007-2010 Chrysler Sebring was assembled in
Sterling Heights, Michigan, United States
Annihilator1111 10 months ago
LISTEN to 'WALKING ON BROKEN GLASS BY ANNIE LENNOX" Start it at the same time as this vid LOL
Beagleface19 2 years ago
YEAH! deal37 got owned, thanks bro!
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
hpw did i get owned?
deal37 2 years ago
well if you think chrysler produces safe or reliable vehicles, you're dead wrong
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
@alexkvaskov Safer and more reliable then they ever have...lol
Ryantravisaol 1 year ago
this car is such a piece of shit
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
very true.....
ventureandcivic 2 years ago
how is it a piece of shit?
deal37 2 years ago
it is unsafe, unreliable, ugly, inefficient, not particularly powerful and being a chrysler crappy in general
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
Comment removed
deal37 2 years ago
it's so unsafe that it got the highest safety rating by the IIHS & the NHTSA, and it's inefficient cause it only gets 32mpg the inline 4's are one of the most powerful it's class while the v6 does fall short by 50hp there better looking than the accord, camy , altima, and fusion and there very reliable
deal37 2 years ago
i'll have to disagree with the accord part :S
firedemon101 2 years ago
hey i never knew you liked the styling of the new accord firedemon
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
I don't like it I love it .I have always been a fan of all Honda Accords
firedemon101 2 years ago
well okay, the new avenger sedan is an iihs top safety pick, but so is the accord (the camry sucks)
the 2.4L DOHC i4 in the sebring sedan produces 173 hp and gets 21/30 mpg while the accord's 2.4L i4 produces 192hp and gets 22/31 mpg
plus the accord's v6 has 36 hp more and gets 19/29 vs the sebring's 16/27. the accord has legendary reliability and even the camry is more reliable. styling is an opinion, but i think the new accord and fusion look fine. plus the new fusion hybrid kicks ass
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
Yeah the "2009" got a IIHS Top Safety Pick, while Ford and GM the past 2 years already had 16 and 8 Top Safety Picks.
2010 Fusion kicks ass on styling inside and out, high quality interior, excellent fit and finish. Very sporty handling and acceleration. Also one of the most fuel efficient vehicles in America. Runs circles around the Sebring and the Sebring's rear end is ugly as hell.
MPG: Fusion 4cyl 22/31, Hybrid 41/36 and people actually get this unlike Chrysler's exaggerated claims!
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
not even i had one as a rental i seen 33mpg on the hwy and the fusion are not that great
deal37 2 years ago
this is coming from someone that thinks Chryslers substandard garbage is great so I don't believe you. The Fusion's interior is way better quality than the Sebring or Avenger and the 2010 is even a lot better.
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
look I'm not saying that the sebring is the greatest car in the world all im saying is that it's not a terrible car and people shouldn't be the sebring so much crap all the time
deal37 2 years ago
plus the new fusion has been improved a LOT and is now considerably better than the sebring. the sebring also has a cheap ass interior and chrysler makes very unreliable vehicles, check out the channel dodgechryslersucks for proof
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
u are such a hater!!!!
deal37 2 years ago
because chrysler sucks
check out donotbuydodgechryslervehicles (DOT) com and donotbuydodge (DOT) com
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
actually he's such a truth teller, his family actually almost bought a Chrysler before doing lots of researching and finding out the facts about Chrysler.
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
well all cars have there faults in them not just chrysler
deal37 2 years ago
Not true, GM and Ford never had unsafe Gen3 Seatbelts that can unlatch in an accident in over 14 million 93-04 vehicles where they witnessed crash test dummies being ejected. Seats that collapse backward when driving in vehicles up to 2000, unsafe door latches where they had to duct tape doors in crash tests in some vehicles, substandard Fuel Rail and FI O-Rings that can cause engines to burst into flames in models up to 2000, no brakeshift where mothers were ran over, I could go on forever!
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
To continue, unsafe, defectively designed LH Platform Steering where drivers can suddenly lose control as inner tie rod bolts are known to snap and racks are known to go bad (93-'04 models), Balljoints prone to fail and snap off causing wheels to fly off on Durango and Dakota up to 2004. 2.7L Engine failures, timing chains snapping, coolant entering the crankcase, engines commonly consuming oil, seizing up at 60K while Chrysler blames the customer even when regular oil changes can be proven.
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
Take some time to visit the dodgechryslersucks YT channel and learn something.
Like someone already said, visit dontbuydodgechryslervehicles do t c o m and daimlerchryslervehicleproblems do t c om get the facts and with reality!
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
all im saying is that i had a good time in my rental sebring that's it and people should not be giving this car so much crap
deal37 2 years ago
Durango Dakota wheel hubs that can suddenly seperate causing wheels to fly off, RAM Axles improperly manufactured that wheels can seperate from. LX Platform (Charger, 300, Magnum) suddenly bursting into flames, Chrysler doesn't know why doesn't care.
Tell that to the guy who's parents died in their newer 300C because seatbelts didn't restrain them AND airbags didn't deploy! I could go on forever!
"well all cars have their faults". No, just Chrysler has these faults and many more.
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
That's correct, the previous Fusion had a sense of cheapness (so does the Sebring and Avenger and they still have it) although it wasn't a bad vehicle but Ford really greatly improved everything from styling to even better quality components inside and out. I'd take one in a heartbeat over any Chrysler any day!
I was amazed by the cheapness of the Sebring's interior and toy like plastics, what makes it worse is that people can pay up to 35K for the Sebring Convertible!
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
It might not be necessarily "unsafe", however it did NOT get the highest IIHS rating, which is a top safety pick. In 2008 Chrysler had ZERO Top Safety Picks while Ford had 16 and GM had 8. Now in 2009 Chrysler "finally" has 2 big wooptyf'ndoo. The highest DOT NHTSA rating is very easy to achieve.
I was amazed at the cheapness of everything especially interior, loud buzzy engine 4cyls and did NOT get nearly as good MPG as claimed.
Plus one can spend up to over 35K on one of these POS!
dodgechryslersucks 2 years ago
stop hating on the sebring
deal37 2 years ago