Added: 1 year ago
From: Conservative1001BG
Views: 31,567
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (131)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Good man.

  • an interview from the same people that cut the cord on his megaphone and messed with there cameras

  • @daniel7899999 i totally agree with you, the reason people think your crazy if you believe in any "conspiracy theory" is because of a lack of education on their part and not taking the time to look into the factual information that is incredibly incriminating in many instances.. thats why alex jones is so bad ass, he takes the time to investigate and expose our gov and brings the facts to the people who otherwise would remain blindfolded

  • Wow. It's incredible how when you talk about how you support the constitution and freedom, they label you a "nut" and "crazy conspiracy theorist". It's so desperate and pathetic.

  • @daniel7899999 Sometimes his ideas are just silly though im sorry. Hes got some great points and if everything he says is true? good, i hope he shines the light on the corrupt. I believe in things i see, ignorant? i dont think so. Religion, alien life, government conspiracy? Its all fun to talk about and to try and put pieces together, but I just wont automatically believe what someone tells me. Gotta see it for myself

  • @DizzyGingerr I agree I used to be into all the conspiracy stuff but at the fundamental level people will do what they want if they believe they can and with that alone is more than a reason to be warry of.people with power and that cant be debunked.

  • @DizzyGingerr, I feel sorry for you and for the people like you who makes themselves willingly blind and want to be slave, and ignorant. You prefer to die while you are alive but in deep sleep. I hope god will help all the people who are blind like you to wake up and see, that when we come together, powerful and bring the changes for the future of our childeren. forget about us because we are already dead. WAKE UP!!!!!

  • they probably were going to put this on tv... then he started talking about the nwo and they decided it was not the best idea......

  • who's govt, who's property, who's freedom is he talking about???????

  • @radoa1 GO search on the internet about the NEW WROLD ORDER, ILLUMNATIE, FREE MASONS. Please read about this people and educate yourself and others if you unerstant and are able to see what's going on.

  • As strange as it sounds to many folks, Alex has been proved right many times in the past

  • Alex Jones is an ideologically minded idiot. People like this are dangerous.

  • @zebbedi What makes you say that? 

  • @seantyler Anybody who has high level rhetorical skills and a blatant penchant for misinformation and avoidance of facts is dangerous. They will garner a following and lead people down the same path as them creating a whole knew group of people who are absent of reality and that hold a cultist attitude.

  • @zebbedi

    You're using buzzwords and giving no examples. Piss off, trollboy.

  • @KaiXi333 I didn't use one buzzword. Clearly, you are so stupid you don't even know what one is. An example of what I was referring to would be Jim Jones.

    Ok,now let's see your example of me being a troll....

    Or..in your deluded world a troll is anybody with an opinion? I thought you yanks love your first amendment and free speech?

  • @zebbedi An example of your being a troll is your first inflammatory comment 2 months ago as well as the name calling you just posted. This has nothing to do with what your opinion is. You gave zero examples of Jones' "avoidance of facts," you just simply said he has a "penchant for misinformation." "Cultist" is a buzzword often used by people from the left. Not only did you use it, you gave no example for it with Jones, you just simply slapped the label on him. Whine, trollboy, whine!

  • @KaiXi333 In America 'cultist' may be a buzzword but in the rest of the world it isn't. What name calling are you referring to? I called you stupid and gave you the reason why. That's opinion backed up by fact.

    Me stating that Alex Jones has a 'penchant for misinformation' is my OPINION. If you would have asked me to back it up with evidence I would have but in this world we don't immediately write essays corroborating our opinions.

  • @KaiXi333 The irony is you immediately labelled me a 'troll' which is an insult, a popular buzzword and is neither supported by any evidence or supportive of your opinion on the subject matter. The level of hypocrisy is so high you must have vertigo.

  • @zebbedi I think people like you are more dangerous because you are blind and ignorant. go read and investigate about the NEW WORLD ORDER!!!!

  • @1265Jane I would do if it wasn't for the fact that I'm an adult now and I stopped believing such ridiculous things during the late 90's when I was 13 years old.

    I have a far greater understanding of the world now and I don't need to compartmentalise complex and nuanced social, economic or political issues.

    I leave the children to conspiracy theories and Santa Claus while I focus on problems more in line with reality.

  • @zebbedi And what may be these "problems in line with reality"? I'm curious to ask aswell, what is your opinion on Ron Paul?

  • Comment removed

  • @zebbedi Okay. So, you like his foreign policy a bit. Kinda odd, cause most of the people who don't support Ron Paul tend to disagree with his foreign policy and agree with everything else.

    Anyway. I'd like to ask you if you can elaborate on why you think his economic ideas are "close to insane". And why do you think his social ideas are insane also? Sorry if feel like you're being interrogated. Just trying to dig out some arguments to your statements so we can have a decent discussion.

  • @Clutch3Ball Why don't you tell me with parts you find sane and I'll counter?

  • @zebbedi First off. He predicted there would be economic collapse in the 1980s. There's video proof of that (which I'm willing to show you if asked). Ever since the last link to gold was gone, the U.S. gov't had the ability to print money endlessly. watch?v=vVkFb26u9g8

    This "fiat money" is based on no value, thus it's based on debt. The Fed prints this money and devaluates the dollar, which in turn weakens the economy and causes inflation. On top of this, failing corporations were getting...

  • @Clutch3Ball ... bailed out by the Gov't. And that bailout money comes from the U.S. tax payer. These bailouts ensure that other corporations/banks/institution­s wouldn't have to worry about getting bankrupt, because if one corporation could get bailed out, they could get bailed out too. This happened. Eventually this type of crony-capitalism has led to the collapse of the economy, because the national debt is unsustainable.

    Ron Paul wants to stop the Fed and he wants a sound monetary policy...

  • @Clutch3Ball This part is a little bit confusing. You're blaming the Fed for doing what it had to do. It HAD to bail out the banks to prevent financial meltdown. This should not be the issue.

    The issue is that a severe lack of regulation and govt oversight allowed the Financial sector to get into so much trouble in the first place.

    Again, this another wild misunderstanding on his part.

  • @Clutch3Ball He didn't predict it. He said that the housing market was in trouble (no secret at the time to those who watch asset bubbles) People like John Paulson, Michael Burry, Jeffrey Greene and many others were well aware of this.

    The most important point is that Ron Paul was completely WRONG about the causes of the problem. He said that over regulation and and govt interference were causing problems when in fact the complete opposite was true. This shows that Ron Paul didn't understand.

  • @Clutch3Ball Another naive misconception on your part is the whole 'printing money' issue. As I wrote my thesis on the Federal Reserve system I'll summarise the situation for you.....

    The Fed DOES NOT print money, the BEP do. (govt dept)

    Money IS NOT printed out of thin air, paper money is in fact exchanged for old money or reserve balance draw downs at the behest of commercial banks.

    Digital money is NEVER created out of thin air either, the Fed has to create a liability on its B sheet.

  • @zebbedi ... backed up by gold and silver. He wants free trade, which we don't have nowadays because of too much gov't regulations. Imagine if schools, hospitals, banks, drug stores, etc. have fierce competition within their own respective branches. They would all deliver the very best quality services the can, against the lowest price. If the customer isn't happy with the one, he could go to the other. This way there will be the best productivity and a great economy. There wouldn't have to...

  • @Clutch3Ball Again, this position makes little to no sense. Regulation is in place to protect the people and maintain business fairness. There are no examples of regulation doing the opposite, if you believe so, I challenge you to present them.

  • @zebbedi ... be any bailouts, gov't bureaucrats, overregulation, overtaxation, ect. Not to mention the unemployment rate would take a nosedive. There would be jobs with higher pay, and there would be job security because it wouldn't be hard at all to go from one job to the other. Having sound money backed with true value would drastically increase the purchasing power of the dollar.

    Sorry for the multiple comments, but there's not enough space. Let me know what you think.

  • @Clutch3Ball Higher pay? You do realise that big corporations of the 'free market' shipped all of your jobs abroad for cheaper rates? And that this increased unemployment? While at the same time the income disparity gap has grown way past historic levels? And if it wasn't for the govt you would have no minimum wage?

  • @zebbedi These big companies you talk about, that go bankrupt and get bailed out are the cancer. They deserve to get bankrupt and replaced by better companies who know how to run their business. If there were legitemate companies competing with each other everywhere and you have supply and demand handling the free market, there would be great profits for every competing company and great economic growth. Also, higher pay because there would be a lot of demand for workers. Think about it.

  • @Clutch3Ball You are right, they deserve to go bankrupt. But do innocent civilians and small business owners deserve to go bankrupt in the fallout?

    No, of course they don't. If regulations was tighter people would have been protected and financial institutions wouldn't have been able to take such risks.

  • @zebbedi As far as the regulation, the United States Constitution is the only legitemate law in the U.S. obviously and it's been trample by government regulations. The Constitution states that only gold and silver is legal tender. The regulations are hurting the small businesses. Here are some explenations:

    - watch?v=ieJuYNK2ZJo

    - watch?v=hwAvjNtTRJY

    - watch?v=SjAvUCzainE

  • @Clutch3Ball Senator Thune is a liar. Republicans often use the 'small business owner' angle to gain favourable deregulation for their financial backers. Don't let them fool you.

    The Constitution is an outdated document that was supposed to be amended to keep with the times. Also, it's interpretation can swing wildly from judge to judge facilitating the need for further law making. Holding the constitution as gospel is no way to improve the U.S and move your country forward.

  • @zebbedi Sir, I don't care about the history of the Republicans/Democrats and what they use as rhetoric. All I'm saying is that the free market cannot be overregulated. Today we have a government dominated economy with a monetary system that's on the verge of collapsing.

    The U.S. Constitution is one of the most, if not the most timeless, sublime, constitutional device in human intelligence. You cannot trivialize what the Fouding Fathers have thought through, and recklessly impose new laws.

  • @Clutch3Ball The constitution is nothing more than a simplistic set of laws that were designed to apply to a large and uncontrollable population of people 200 years ago. It is neither unique or infallible.

  • @zebbedi enjoy the pigs cock in your ass.

  • @ApplesStudios Get an education.

  • @zebbedi hahahaha you just said that you don't think the constitution should apply, wtf are you, move out of the country disgusting fascist.

  • @crazy3d What makes you think I'm in your country?

  • @zebbedi Also, small businesses that go bankrupt, should go bankrupt aswell. It's the nature of capitalism to "lose and win". If you can't compete with other small businesses who are more succesful, then don't. But then again, due to the ever growing economy you're chances of going bankrupt are slim at best if you know how to handle your business well and you do so. As far as the consumer, he has no problem at all of course thanks to the free market allowing new businesses to provide services.

  • Comment removed

  • A straightforward profile of Alex Jones. 

  • best damn interview I've seen so far by the media big wigs! :)

  • I'm willing to believe that Ok City was also an ins-job.Didn't think so before,but in this era ANY-FREEKIN-THING is possible.But the ramifications of the mother of all inside jobs, 9/11, have literally changed history, for the worse. The killers walk free, hawk their books, like Bush, now Rumsfeld and that steaming lump of shit Cheney.The 2 wars based on lies continue and our finances are so decimated from war cost that we'll be broke forever. To be clear, I believe in A.Jones and admire him.

  • Great answer, i am also a Constitutionalist. Forget liberal and conservative.

  • Sound volume blows!

  • Comment removed

  • @LiquidMetalBand Maybe so and he also tends to cut callers off instantly if they disagree with them or harshly insult them. I have to admit he does have a serious attitude problem to his regular callers which is extremely out of order.

  • I like Alex, I have listened to his show for 8 years. My ONLY problem with him, as many others have stated, is that he will not state the obvious common thread that all the culprits of 9/11 and all the NWO king pins have in common - THEY ARE ALL ZIONISTS.

    .

  • @MikeyGonebad true Mike, he tends to be married to the word "globalists" were in actual fact it is has the double meaning of "zionists".

  • @MikeyGonebad

    You really think the NWO is moving to protect Israel?

    Hmmm.

  • @ztimbo If you count the central banking cartels, their families, and the heads of almost all major industries including the media and war-profiteering corporations as being "NWO".....then YES! Most of them are kikes....all of them are zionists. That is undisputed.

    Something tells me you're a jew because you're pretending you don't see this as being so.

  • @MikeyGonebad Then you are delusional. Do you thik the heads of OPEC are Jews tooo? How about China who is the poster child for the globalist template? Jews? Am I a jew? You people obsess on race a little to much and dismiss the idea that the installed corporate/political leaders share a one world government philosophy.

  • Alex is a ROCK STAR

  • @egderegor Bill Hicks

  • @moh1612 Bill Cooper, Bill Hicks was great.

  • The Constitution was opposed by anti-federalist like Alex Jones

  •  Good articulate speaker that knows how to deliver.

  • Good job Alex, its too bad that it never made the air in MSM. Of course it is obvious why... your too calm, too sensible for a true hit piece to make sense.

  • Alex Jones is a foul liar, fraud!

  • Comment removed

  • This is probably one of the best Alex Jones interviews I have seen. Calm and rational explanation is what is going to win over public opinion.

  • He believes in shattering the left/right paradigm? Why does he endorse Republican candidates almost exclusively?

  • @911AnInsideJob This is not true. He doesn't endorse exclusively Republican candidates. He tells everyone to only vote for the Constitutional candidates no matter what party they are.

  • @911AnInsideJob Do you mean because he endorses Ron Paul, who is constantly at odds with the Republican leadership, particularly when it comes to our foreign policy? You're looking at recent history, with Obama being in power there has been more emphasis on exposing Obama's true agenda. But I believe Alex Jones was also exposing Dubya when he was in office.

  • @911AnInsideJob Because there are almost no constutionalists in the Democratic Party. And Alex Jones himself will admit that the establishment of the Republican Party are totally corrupt.

    Credit where due, he's also given kudos to Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel and Trey Grayson.

  • @911AnInsideJob Secondly, I've been listening/watching Alex Jones for 8 years. During the Bush administration, he was withering in his criticism of the GOP, the Iraq War, the War on Drugs.. he's in favour of drug decriminalisation, hardly a right-wing position.

  • He believes in shattering the left/right paradigm? Why does he endorse Republican candidates almost exclusively?

  • @911AnInsideJob he is not for parties but for individuals like ron and raun paul - check TheAlexJonesChannel

  • To HOT for TV.

  • Alex Jones' argument relies on one key thing, the NWO has to exists.

  • @StupidWindmill yeah, and it has to exists (sic) because they talk about it all of time! Gordon Brown, Bill Clinton, etc.

  • @StupidWindmill The New World Order, or those pushing for a New World Order, exist. Publicly. On record.

    Henry Kissinger, George Bush Sr, David Rockefeller, they've all made public statements commenting on how to create a New World Order.

    Alex Jones doesn't use the New World Order as the name for thirteen men sitting around a table in a smoky room directing the affairs of the world.

    He uses the word as a name for the movement who are strongly pressing for world political integration

  • i don't watch em anyway, especially Faux.. only Infowars.com!! and Drudge, few others

  • As usual, great stuff Alex. I can see why MSNBC cut this out. They felt threatened by your intellect.

  • @tshirtfaction

    ...Wow you fell for it ahahahahahah.

  • @StupidWindmill Clearly a troll. All the comments on your profile page indicate that all you do is go around commenting on these kinds of videos making intemperate remarks.

    You're clearly obsessed, you should calm down a bit, stop, think, then get some professional help.

  • finally msnbc puts out some good interview

  • SOUTH PARK - ABOUT LAST NIGHT

  • props to Conservative1001BG for finding this and posting it. there's some interesting uploads on BG's page. showing respect, i just subscribed.

  • MSNBC, brought to you by the biggest Defense company on earth, GE.

  • Since when is msnbc a news organization?

  • How can this reporter sleep at night after hearing this interview and watching his company cut all of the meat out of it and only let them run like one sentence? You would think he would be laying in bed that night awake wondering if he was working for the right company.  Hope they are paying you well MSNBC....your kids will have to live in the hell you are helping create.

  • not adited? hmmm MSNBC? hmmm

  • who disliked this lol

  • @osiris6669 "Operatives", "Disinformation Agents" and "Provocateurs".......

  • A true patriot of humanity! if there were more MEN like this man,we wouldn't be in half the trouble were in,but instead the criminals and that goes for the people who just"look the other way" and expect others to fight for their freedom just like keyboard activists,who do nothing but sit on forums or websites.ACTION IS THE ONLY ANSWER

    Post flyers in every public place you can find,telegraph poles,public toilets,phone box's.A $80 printer and a bit of effort.Get off your butts! or don't complain.

  • Gee, I can't imagine why MSNBC didn't use this part? They're a little better than FOX but not much more truthful in their choice of reports and the information reported. It's a shame.

  • THANK YOU!!

  • to the uploader: did MSNBC use this interview and show it on TV? or did they do what CNN did and basically discard it?

  • @ElectricGravity I stumbled upon this video on msnbc.com's Hardball video page...I scrolled down and happen to find the full interview, with the title including the phrase "Web Exclusive"...meaning that it was not intended to be on the hit piece special.

  • This is the best interview I have ever seen.

  • @80spopman How can you say this interview was the "best" The man didn't mention the one issue above all others. It's the issue which attracted me to Alex to begin with. 9/11, 9/11, and one more time, 9 freekin/11.truth! We have no country whatsoever while the home grown killers who did it walk free.Come on Alex, stop cozying up to the likes of Ted Nuggent and other right wingers who won't even talk to you about the crime of the millenia.Get back on track big guy.We gotta see those bastards hang.

  • @Loejyrrab Yes, Loejyrrab, 9/11 is a big issue and needs further review. But Alex is doing what he can to show people the way. He is only one man. With a national radio show and a world wide internet audience. Loejyrrab, you want to talk about an inside job. I trained with the very trainers in the US Army that trained McVeigh. Now the Oklahoma City bombings, that was an inside job.

  • Where is the rest of this video?

  • The militias of our Founding Fathers were state controlled. The reason the Second Amendment was added to the Constitution was not so that groups of people with guns could overthrow a government, but it was so that the States could seize power away from the federal government in the event that it got to powerful and started to take the power of the States away. Therefore, it is up to the States and the people together to use force against the federal government, not just the people alone.

  • There is more than one type of militia in the US.

    There is...

    Organized (National and State Guard)

    Unorganized (Everyone male 17 - 45 [Militia Act 1903])

    Select (portion of the population)

    Private (Everyone else)

    "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. "

    -James Madison "Father of the Constitution"

    The founding fathers saw every able body as a member of the militia.

  • @st4ticblu3 I have known everything that you just wrote, for over 20 years, but it is not what I'm talking about. There is no history in this country of people rebelling against the government. Of course there was the whiskey rebellion, but as you know, they rightfully got their butts kicked by President Washington and the troops that he gathered to put them back in their place; he enforced the rule of law. I remind you, there is the rule of law and there is voting, so use it.

  • @jbranstetter04 Yeah but the states used to do that through senate and now that's impossible so it's up to the people.

  • @GompCelticPL You make a good point with that, but it is still within the power of the States to override the federal government by changing the constitution. I know, the feds will just ignore it and the Supreme Court will misinterpret it. Then let the states because of pressure from the people, let them stop taking money from DC. It is by way of the money that the feds control the States, so stop taking the money and the strings and rules that come with it.

  • Hmm....I need more convincing of this guy before I take interest in him. I keep hearing how he's this great nationalist. Well then I ask you fans of him to prove it to me. Where does he stand on the issues? Why would MoreShittyNonsenseByCunts be willing to hear him out like that, but won't give the time of day to Michael Savage?

  • @THEsquirrel3d Why not convince yourself and visit infowars/dot/com

  • @imcrime Ok...but after you answer this question. Has he come out and defended Michael Savage against this banning in Britain?

  • Comment removed

  • @THEsquirrel3d C'mon you're a big boy why don't you just YT search Alex Jones Michael Savage. Yeah, he defended his free speech, he's not a neocon though. Founding fathers were classical liberals just like Ron Paul, Mises, Reagan, Peter Schiff etc. so I guess you could call him a classical liberal. He's pro free-market, small government, the rule of law, he doesn't like welfare and warfare state so yeah liberals like Voltaire and Jefferson would approve that. 

  • @GompCelticPL Yea, because today's liberals are not liberals. They are progressives that call themselves liberals. They now the public won't stand for progressives so they change their name to something more appealing. It's even documented as a tactic from their "Rules for Radicals" book.

  • @THEsquirrel3d AJ has numerous times and is also very happy with Savage lately. Savage woke up.

  • @THEsquirrel3d This guy still blames the Bush admin and international Illuminati for planting explosives in both twin towers on 9/11.

  • SYSTEM CRASH

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more