Added: 4 years ago
From: wils5742
Views: 267,851
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,234)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why do people ruin videos by putting in music so you can't even hear the message.

  • ron pauls a racist

  • @MorshusVagina ur ignorant im black and imma vote for him ur the downfall of humanity and those around u...

  • @MrGDjDG he hates niggers!

  • @MorshusVagina how much do you get paid to be a sock puppet, or are you hoping a talent scout will spot you, cos your kinda shit.

  • @shinobiung cocks

  • Teapartyvictory, I like your passion. Do you remember Weapons of Mass Destruction? Iraq? They didn't even exsist! Did you ever hear about military corporations? Did you know they employ and own your teleprompter reading media? Who make believe around every corner is a terrorist. That's why I need TSA digging in my pants, and checkpoints, and detectors as if I'm the criminall! I think you're buying the conspiracies against you god given rights! No nukes says the cia and other informants.

  • Lets get it over with...VOTE New World Order 2012.

  • @TheSiftonStrangler lol... no

  • RON PAUL?! THE RACIST'S POLL NUMBERS ARE FALLING FOR A REASON: NO ONE KNOWS WHY HE SAYS HE THINKS THAT A COUNTRY WITH A CULTURE OF BEHEADINGS, WHO KILL THEMSELVES TO KILL US TO ATTAIN HEAVEN, THINK ENOUGH LIKE US THAT THEY WILL RESPOND TO KINDNESS AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY BROKEN UN SANCTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN PURSUIT OF A NUCLEAR WARHEAD, BUT CLICK ON OUR NAME - TEA PART VICTORY - TO SEE HOW DANGEROUS RON PAUL ACTUALLY IS.

  • @TeaPartyVictory 1. He's the only candidate whose voting record stands up for equality. 2. If you return hate for hate, you will continue the cycle. You have to stop it by choice. 3. UN sanctions do not mean anything to U.S. citizens. We pledge allegiance to the U.S. Constitution. 4. Iran has declared many times that nuclear weapons are against their own religion. 5. I do'nt think you have any affiliation with the real Tea Party or informed Conservatives. I think you're a troll.

  • @TeaPartyVictory Do just go around to every Ron Paul video and paste the same thing?

  • @TeaPartyVictory

    Quit being a little Fear Mongering bitch.

    Put your panties on.

    Stop living in fear, a MUSLIM isn't going to pop out of the bushes and rape you at any moment.

  • @deosullivan3

    I stand corrected, and my point is completely obliterated by your observation that it's gigantic data set of 55 rather than a tiny set of 44. The president will also always be the tallest candidate with the most European royal blood forever and ever until the end of time.

    And your little taunt at the end seems to rest on an assumption that Republicans would vote for Obama over Ron Paul or that independents would be afraid of him (which is demonstrably false).

  • @Eyedunno Boy, you're a little slow on the uptake here, aren't you? I posted this ages ago.

    In any case, it's not the size of the data set--size doesn't matter here--but rather your obvious inability to properly think through problems correctly. In any case, it pretty confirms how I feel about Ron Paul supporters: they are drawn in by his seductive but rather shallow rhetoric because they can't really think properly for themselves.

  • Thumbs down for drowning out the quote with porno music.

  • If you liked that quote, you would LOVE Harry Browne's speeches, especially the ones he gave at the 1996 Libertarian Party National Convention and the 2000 Libertarian Party National Convention. :)

  • he s demonstrated this strenghts throughout his carreeer!! u dont understand what he says

  • Can't really hear what he's saying, the music is too loud. Too bad.

  • P.S., Dr. Ron Paul is a doctor dumb asses! Which makes him smarter than most of all the previous presidents (including Obama, who's IQ is 147) by default... Dr. Ron Paul is very intelligent!!! So intelligent he pushes into the realm of psychic ability, because he definitely foreseen everything that's happening now years ago.

  • It's a well backed and believed one, but a theory nonetheless! And just because he believes in creationism doesn't mean he's stupid, idiots! There are people who believe in evolution who are already running the country, in fact most people running the country believe in evolution, and look at the shape we're in! The first title of darwin's book on evolution suggested that all human beings should compete against each other until death and do our brother man in. How dumb is that?!

  • awesome! im not sure what exactly got me on ron paul and it really does not matter. what matterd to me was there was no flip flopping on any issues he is a man of conviction.i do not trust the letters for there is nobody coming out saying these things to back up the story. he 76 yrs old if he was a racist there would be plenty of people coming out and saying so.i trust ron paul and have hope he can make serious changes in america that desperately needs.but for that to happen he needs our vote.

  • F**k this absolutist, ignorant creationist.

  • @DanGRtheMan Who cares if he's a creationist? If elected, you would never know, from his policies, anything about his religious beliefs.

  • @minusjason It is VERY important. A man who thinks that Evolution is just a theory is an ignorant person who refuses to examine the facts. To be a politician you have to be able to critically examine which policies work and why, and his beliefs show this to not be the case.

    @elysianfury I'm not talking about whether God exists or whether He created our evolutionary ancestors, my point is that Ron Paul believes it is plausible that the earth is 10,000 years old.

  • @DanGRtheMan If only things were as cut and dry as you think they are. I happen to know that many creationists are intelligent people, despite disagreeing with them on this issue. It will take a long time (generations) for the idea of evolution to get through to the religious but it does not mean every one of those people is stupid. You are making quite a leap extending him being wrong on evolution to him not understanding policy.

  • @minusjason Ron Paul ignorantly thinks that because Scientists say evolution is a SCIENTIFIC theory then it is a GENERAL theory, but Evolution is a general fact. Yes, religious people aren't dumb - I was religious, but if it stops you from thinking objectively then it is a problem.

    I also think Ron Paul behaves very arrogantly when there are a variety of opinions on the Libertarianism vs Socialism debate. That's what I don't like. He doesn't even have a degree in Economics.

  • @DanGRtheMan Just because you don't have a degree doesn't mean he isn't intelligent. Have you even heard him talk about Economics? The guy is a genius and has been predicting nearly everything thats happened for the past 10 years? Are you out of your fucking mind?

  • @mattprd7 Yes he has made correct predictions but he is obsessed with the purity of laissez faire economics and doesn't realize that with too little government intervention, PEOPLE will begin to take liberties with other people's freedoms instead of government. There NEEDS to be constant debate between Libertarianism and Socialism but Ron is too arrogant to see this. Absolutism is Evil and Ron believes in Absolute policy.

    @franklyhanky He is a doctor in Medicine, and evolution is FACT.

  • @DanGRtheMan

    watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

    you should definitly watch this man, it really shows that he knows what hes talking about!

  • @pigolf69 Yeah, that is bloody impressive. Maybe his ignorance in thinking evolution is just a theory is ignorance confined to one area of knowledge.

    But I still worry that he is too arrogant and doesn't realize that government intervention is important in making sure people doesn't take away the freedoms of others. If he shows me he is open to other people's opinions then I will relax any harsh views I have on him.

    But that video restored a lot of confidence from me in him.

  • @minusjason No minus, if a person thinks the Earth is 6,000 yr old, they cannot be an intelligent being. They are dumb asses!

  • @Loejyrrab so since someone has a different belief than u that makes them a dumb ass about everything else they said?

  • @mlgnerd13 No nerd, people can have different beliefs on a myriad of issues and not be a dumb ass. But if one believes that the Earth is 6K yrs old, than that person is indeed a DUMB ASS

  • @mlgnerd13 People can have different opinions on many issues. But the age of the Earth is not in serious dispute. If one believes the biblical age of the Earth, 6K years, they are a dumb ass.

  • @DanGRtheMan so are you trying to say that god didn't create the monkeys we evolved from? or the big bang

  • What an inspirational quote from such a wonderful drum machine

  • @bbnatedogg

    Well, I wasn't there when it was written, but James Madison wrote and spoke extensively about what his intentions were when he wrote it.

    There may be legitimate disagreements in interpretations on specific parts of the constitution, but those who make this argument generally don't care about the constitution at all. Most of them have never even read it.

    For instance, would you care to explain what in the constitution grants the federal government authority over education?

  • @bbnatedogg

    How is America isolationist if it engages in open commerce and participates in a free exchange of ideas with the rest of the people of the world?

    Our government trying to spread its authority over the rest of the world is a violation of the sovereignty of other people.

    A non-interventionist government is not the same as an isolationist society. There's more to America than the federal government.

    It's a sad day when Americans can't differentiate between the two.

  • @tubecrabs I agree. I don't think our founding fathers had it in their minds that we would be policing the world. I think they only saw an issue if the world came to our borders and attacked us directly. But primarily I think they wanted to stay out of everyone elses business, and expected us to stick to our own affairs. sadly time changes things, but it would be better if we focused on our own issues at hand.

  • @tubecrabs Nice. Keep up the good work

  • Too bad you COMPLETELY drowned out that awesome & powerful statement with inappropriate music... (I actually like that beat & riff quite a bit- it just doesn't seem to work with this clip blasting at such a high amplitude.)

  • would have been better without that stupid music.

  • i never advocated Oh-Bummer - he's merely more of the same,, and America and the world are much worse for it

  • background music too loud

  • Comment removed

  • @StructuredDRIVING

    stay off our internets dumb conspiracy theorist. go play with your crocodiles

  • @StructuredDRIVING You know. I remember 4 years ago when we elected Obama the world was cheering us on. Now you all hate him too. Don't get me wrong I love Ron and will vote for him. But I just find it funny to see so many people inner countries begging us to vote for him just like you did for Obama when Obama was running.

  • @mezlabor im an aussie to and 4 years ago i alreday waanted ron paul i never said obama

  • @mezlabor where do you get off Bud ?.

    Assuming I supported Obama ??????????????

    I remember 4 years ago I WAS IMPRESSED AT HOW WELL OBAMA could communicate,BUT I NEVER SUPPORTED HIM ever.

    He was "TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE",I believe my comments were at the time.

    So please don't EVER put words into my mouth !.

    Vote RON PAUL in 2012,because I feel HE COULD WELL BE THE LAST PRESIDENT OF YOUR ONCE PROUD NATION !.

  • @mezlabor You honestly believe the world revolves around the USofA,don't you ?.That is only true because the psychopaths who are the threat to OUR worlds peace live in Israel ,and the US just follows orders ! .the "Learned Elders of Zion" is something you should read,not that you could possibly comprehend the philosophy contain therein.

    If the US was to instantly disappear off the face of this planet,DO YOU FOR ONE SECOND THINK HUMANITY WOULD STOP ???.

    Grow up fool !.

  • @StructuredDRIVING No actually I dont believe the world revolves around us. I simply said that when Obama was running there was a flood of comments from other countries begging us to elect him. If you actually knew me you would know that I am a staunch detractor of unilateral support for Israel. I want the US to mind its own business. I know that the belief we can "Fix" whatever is going on there is absurd. We need to leave the middle east entirely. For own good and there's.

  • @StructuredDRIVING

    Lol philosophy in Elders of Zion. You must be trolling.

  • @pulsatingremedy It is not difficult to pick a Jew,Obviously.

    Now go away(preferably back to Israel,where Jews belong ,NOT to be confused with Palastine !).

    Pussbag.

  • @StructuredDRIVING

    What are you talking about.

  • The only problem with this is that throughout mankind we have existed as a community. Even in the Amazons the people exist as a community because it works best. It works best for all to work together for all mankind not exclusively as individuals.

  • @bronzevillenews the role of family is still important in modern society. but once a community swells beyond a few hundred people, you need to focus on smaller units. its funny how liberals use arguments like these and then use the past as a reference point, but when sum1 promotes individual liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and then uses the past as an example, liberals are quick to say "oh no, thats was then, we are living in entirely diferent times"

  • @DaMosFrivolous Its not the past I'm referring to. There are Amazon people living now in jungles as a community. Its not the past I'm referring to. If the past is irrelevant, then why talk about it at all. Lets keep making the same mistakes why don't we.  I never said I was a liberal. I'm a Christian first and my duty as a Christian extends beyond SELF.

  • @bronzevillenews

    Well, I think you've possibly just misunderstood what he's said.

    You seem to intuitively understand that you don't need government to select friends for you, or to pick out a spouse and force him/her to marry you. That's all Ron Paul's talking about.

    So, no, Ron Paul isn't promoting an end to fraternity, he's promoting an end to government forced fraternity. We should all associate with whom we see fit, however we see fit to do so. Not forced into social arrangements by law.

  • @tubecrabs I'm sorry buy I already associate with whom I want to associate with.

  • @bronzevillenews

    Well that's good, and I'm certainly not suggesting you do otherwise. I understood your comment to be a criticism of Ron Paul's comments. It sounded like you were saying that community can't exist without an interventionist government.

  • @tubecrabs He goes well beyond that. I admire a few of his views but, he would look like a radical Libertarian next to Adam Smith!!!!!!!! Even Adam Smith admitted that government was needed to perform the functions that the private sector could or would not.

  • @bbnatedogg

    Adam Smith misunderstood market forces, though! For example, Adam Smith's notion that perfect competition requires an industry characterized by the existence of many competing firms was fallacious.

    Even so, Ron Paul is a constitutionalist. He doesn't oppose all government action. He opposes, specifically, to the federal government destroying liberty in violation of the constitution. Either the constitution matters or it doesn't; Ron Paul thinks it does, and you should too!

  • @tubecrabs That's simplistic at best. The constitution isn't some magical document that is clear as a bell to everyone and not open to different interpretations.  There are Originalists, Literalists, Pragmatists. Those that believe the government can only do what is enumerated in the constitution and those who think think it can do anything not expressly forbidden by the constitution. Then there is the 9th amendment. So, don't act like Paul has some divine knowledge about the constit

  • @bbnatedogg

    Actually, the constitution does have one meaning. How would it make sense otherwise? Was the constitution supposed to mean different things to different people? No, it has one definite meaning. Big government proponents care little about the constitution's intended restraints. They see the constitution as an obstacle, and search for ambiguous wording they can reinterpret to grant them more and more power. Article 1 Section 8 enumerated the LIMITED powers of the federal legislators.

  • @tubecrabs He doesn't believe the government should have any role in education or commerce! He thinks we should be completely isolationist! I agree about us having an empire but, being isolationist has failed time and time again and is completely irrational in a globalized world.

  • @bbnatedogg

    The federal government has a role in promoting commerce among the states via the commerce clause of the constitution. However, the federal government uses the commerce clause as an excuse to impose undue regulation on the market, not foster national trade.

    Regarding education, Ron Paul's for the states running schools however they wish. The constitution does not list education as a role of federal legislators.

    Paul's a free-trade non-interventionist, not an isolationist.

  • @tubecrabs "Promoting commerce"? Gee, that's not vague! The 2nd amendment. Gee, that's not vague. The 9th amendment??? The constitution does not have "one meaning"!!!!!!!!!!!! The fucking founding fathers couldn't even agree on it! Don't confuse your and Paul's INTERPRETATION of the constitution as fact!! And if you're not in favor of any military intervention unless we are personally attacked then you are an ISOLATIONIST!

  • FREEDOM!

  • Yup. Pretty good quote.

  • Comment removed

  • They were caught deleting thermometers in colder areas & adding them in warmer climates. Their solution is to charge you & your pets to breath. There are real environmental problems out there, like toxic waste dumping, Chem Trails, Fukushima has been belching radioactive death into the sky for a year So they've declared radiation to be safe & raised the safety levels by 100000's. Carbon Dioxide is part of the life cycle it isn't dangerous. The Al Gore movie was a good comedy though

  • Ron Paul would be ok if he understood one thing is that in this day and age piece comes with strength which is a quote from Ronnie Reagan.If the world has all pieceful leaders then his policy might be best but when half if not more of the world is run by a bunch of nuts who have radical beliefs you have to push and shove its that fucking simple and he surely has to be saying this for anti-war votes because he would not be where he is if he was this fucking ignorant.He knows war comes at anytime.

  • @jp221073 It is one thing to protect national interest but starting wars and having troops stationed in countries that should step up and protect themselves doesn't make sense. It also doesn't make sense to overthrow leaders of nations and piss off their people, then turn around and call them enemies because we want their oil. Can you kind of see how our government is in the wrong here? Besides it would be economic suicide to invade Iran and that would ruin our relationship with China.

  • Ron Paul vs Status Quo 2012

  • There's a lot of Architects, the same ones who cleaned up the Oklahoma City Bombing, that tell us its completely normal for a few office fires to bring WTC 7 down symmetrically in 6 seconds. When looking for the facts I tend to trust independent studies (Like the 1200 architects who call bull shit on WTC 7) & not ones sponsored and paid by governments. We have enough documented declassified proof that the government has an agenda and lies 80% of the time. We also know people sell out for money

  • @JGH8sDaDebunkerz Im not a truther but damn, building 7 is pretty unexplained

  • The constitution doesn't give us our liberty or our freedom to choose the way to go, God does. We were created with a free will, but "government" tries to impose it's will upon us, which is not the way our forefathers intended. If you are an adult, you don't need a babysitter. It's up to all of us to step up to the plate and command our own destiny. Government can't do it, but we are allowing them to run our lives, and it's our own fault. We have gotten too complacent. It's time to WAKE UP!

  • Sweet music..jk...its really gay

  • It would have been a lot easier to hear what Ron Paul said without the figgin' stupid music.

  • Step no.1 delete this video. Step no.2 go back into editing and turn the music down. Step no.3 re-upload it and spread Paul's message of freedom ;)

  • Amazing soon to be President Romney is fighting so HARD to invade Iran after sitting out the Vietnam draft in France on a RELIGIOUS deferment!!!

    He will order others to war as Commander-in-Chief!!! He's banging the drums that Obama got out of Iraq too soon, and is getting out of Afghanistan too soon!

    When asked about his 5 sons, Mitt Romney said they were serving their country "better" by staying home and helping him campaign!

    Mitt Romney = a robot designed to be a politician, by a cult

  • Puts a lump in your throat, doesn't it?

  • RON PAUL / RAND PAUL 2012 PAUL/PAUL 2012

  • • It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"

    PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.

    IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !

    WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere

  • I admire Paul's integrity, I think he may be the grittiest politician we have. But I fear libertarianism taken to its extreme, and two Paul examples stand out: 1) when asked about global warming he quickly started talking about volcanoes, a tired old hand-wave response; and 2) he didn't have a good answer about the uninsured man in a coma.

  • @929myohmy Global Warming is a fraud, that's a fact. They paid scientist to manipulate the data so Al Gore can make billions selling us carbon credits, essentially charging us to breath haha and Ron Paul took patients in for free if they were poor, that's how he ran his practice. This can't happen with the government in control of health care.. they've totally bankrupted it. Ron Paul wants doctors talking with patients like it used to be. The hospital will take a coma victim in.

  • @JGH8sDaDebunkerz You would be hard pressed to find a single reputable science academy that has not expressed consensus on Global warming. CONSENSUS. Over 30 of the largest bodies of science worldwide, in geology, meteorology, paleoclimatology, oceanography, and so on. Thousands of scientists and thousands of peer-reviewed research papers. The corroboration could hardly be stronger. That's a lot of scientists to buy off, assuming they were all for sale (and you really think so?).

  • @929myohmy There's huge government grants on the line.. so are you asking me if people can be persuaded to delete a few thermometers & add a few in warmer area's, put weather stations near heat-generating equipment, next to air-conditioning units or on waste-treatment plants, alongside a waste incinerator. A weather station at Rome airport was found to catch the hot exhaust fumes emitted by taxiing jets. Hmm skewed data to fit an agenda...Cant be! Al Gores carbon credit store is open

  • @JGH8sDaDebunkerz Debunkerz perpetuating a long since-debunked "heat island" myth, that's ironic. When the idea was first put forward, scientists were saying, 'You know that could be problematic, let's look into it.' They did--temperature trends held true. And yeah, the majority of scientists in every major body of scientists worldwide are conspiring to keep their peer-reviewed data and reports tweeked so they can get those grants. That's most likely it, scientists are notorious for that!

  • @929myohmy What you fear is your perception that your fellow Americans are completely heartless and void of compassion which is not the case. If people didn't have to pay so much for taxes and inflation we would have more money to give for charities. It is not the governments job to legislate morality because if we let the gov. legislate morality they can also legislate immorality. When realizing how seldom the government listens to its people why do we trust it with so much power?

  • @clintcastle The hows and whys of social charity are not my big fears, I can imagine people stepping up in that regard. I don't want to see "the market" go unregulated, as I don't believe that idea that the invisible hand of the market will correct imbalances. I guess I don't know enough about the libertarian view in that regard--where is the line drawn for when regulation is justified?

  • @929myohmy Laws against fraud and general harm to society should be looked at as a way of solving our problems. We need more laws protecting whistleblowers and giving less financial advantage in courtrooms to corporations. The judicial branch was the first branch to become corrupted so we just need to fix that first and not let this country become a bureaucracy of unaccountable, unelected foxes guarding the hen house, like Goldman Sachs executives in charge of the treasury.

  • @929myohmy We also need more white collar criminals to go to jail, we used to have more of that and I think that kept us in line a little better.

  • @clintcastle I'm fine with all of that. How would a libertarian typically address the problem of overfishing (to go with one example)?

  • @929myohmy That is typically an over population problem, I mean is there really a way to stop that? The deterioration of our planet is not something we can legislate out of inevitability, there is no way to reduce our carbon footprint with the world population at current levels. Dont expect libertarianism or any "ism" to solve that one. Once again if we had laws that corporations were not above and made an example out of CEOs we could at least curb it a little.

  • @clintcastle

    Everyone on earth could fit in Texas with 1/4 acre each.

    The people that preach population reduction are a handful of obscenely rich banking families and old euro "royalty". They are psychopathic, murderous control freaks that want to reduce the world population to under 500 million in perpetuity by killing off billions. 500m is a number they feel their family dynasties can rule over and control completely as serfs/servants in their new world feudal system, forever.

  • @29261000 Absolutely incorrect. Texas has 268,820 square miles (including water). There are 640 acres per square mile. That makes 172,044,800 acres in Texas... That's roughly 40 people per acre; or, approximately 118 square feet per person. That'd be about a 10x12 foot room (once again, including water) for everyone in the world in Texas- a far cry from this ridiculous myth that the whole world would have so much space in Texas...

  • @AlexMoensChannel Still, expand that out to the entire continental USA, (landspace only and playing some mean Tetris), and you would have about 11,750 sq ft (125' by 94') for every man, woman, and child on the earth. Bring the population up to 32 billion, and each individual still has more than enough for a 50'x50' area, with the rest of the planet still open for resource harvesting. And all of this assumes you don't bother with any living spaces above one story, ie apartments.

  • @Altimadark You know what i say ? Demolish every Walmart, Mcdonalds, and those wasteful Golf Courses. Cant forget about those... where do we stand now ? srry i suck at math

  • @rammanu123 I'd say that's a different argument altogether; my point was just that we have more than enough space for everybody on the planet.

    Also, I'm not for demolishing stuff on other people's property. If they can demolish a privately owned golf course, they can demolish my privately owned house, or my privately owned car, etc.

  • @Altimadark

    Sarcasm man srry its a bitch of an inherited trait.

  • @29261000 The matter of space we consume is irrelevant, its the amount of finite resources that will be the end of us. The exponential growth of the human species is unsustainable especially with the technology we are comfortable using. Find it puzzling that the worlds financial market is collapsing? It is because our currency isnt worth the paper its not printed on and the cause of that is finite resources. We must dominate what "rouge" states are left in order to keep this going

  • @clintcastle The human population is not growing exponentially. Even the upper estimates of population growth show the population growing at a roughly linear rate through 2100, tapering down a bit towards the end. The limited resources of each individual provide a natural check that no government needs to implement. The only way the human pop. could grow exponentially is if we actually had unlimited resources.

  • @Altimadark So even populationalists have us dying off in about a hundred years....

    Haha, yeah, tell that to China -- then turn around and say it to India.

  • @cattanoj1 Erm, when I said "tapering down," I meant the rate of growth, not the population as a whole.

  • @Altimadark Right now we are growing exponentially and you are right, it will slow down eventually, but is it smart to use everything we have quickly before we even obtain the technology to sufficiently replace it? You seemed to have missed my original point that right now our money supply is in much broader supply than resources give it credit for IE the HUMONGOUS financial sector that runs this country.

  • @clintcastle The human population is not growing exponentially. It never has been. We're just learning how to use our resources better, as we have since the dawn of time. The population is growing in response to that. That growth, in turn, increases our collective intellect and spurs on more advancement (for example, no one person can build a computer mouse). Yes, there is an upper limit to the population the planet can support, but it's considerably higher than 7 billion.

  • @clintcastle We individually have to take an oath to have fewer children, to decrease the overpopulation problem.

  • @rich38001 I have for this purpose, That and I dont want my children to suffer in what will be our eventual economic collapse.

  • "In Ron Paul We Trust"

    RonPaul2012

  • Barak Obama has 170 youtube accounts

  • Even mad men make sense from time to time. My step dads mother used to talk to me about being in Germany as a little girl listening to Adolf Hitler at all his rallies and she said that at first he made sense but the more she and her mother went to these rallies the more insane he started to sound. First it's trains that run on time then who knows. Be very carefull for whom you place your trust, do not be swayed by smiles and handshakes.

  • @TheHatesutube I quite agree. I believe this was the general message when Obama was running for office. One the other hand, Paul has already proven himself through consistency in congress.

  • @TheHatesutube

    Well guess that is the difference, more you listen the more things make sense. Since his pretty much teaching a US history, economics and ideals class when he speaks. His congress record plus his speeches over decades in congress reflect that.

    So even if you disagree with his ideals & fixes he does go through the effort to explain in detail how US ended up in this state.

  • The time is Now......the man for the time is Ron Paul !!

  • Ron Paul For The Long Haul!

  • I think Paul had better get some Secret Service Protection. The last President who wanted to audit the Federal Reserve (JFK) ended up dead.

  • @ronpaulforpresident6

    Divine Protection even more so-

    (Search: the bulletproof George Washington)

    RON PAUL 2012!!!

  • @ronpaulforpresident6

    True that

  • @ronpaulforpresident6

    Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying,

    Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?

    Then said I, Here am I; send me. Isaiah 6:8

  • @ronpaulforpresident6 Wasn't it the secret services that did the "removal" of jfk?

  • You are free to turn the music down so we can hear the quote clearly.

  • Ron Paul 2012 ... his demographic is like 18 - 25 tho and alot of ppl that age arent registered to vote... so im worried even tho he is the right choice

  • Ron Paul is the biggest danger facing the world today.

  • @edwardoleander Ron Paul is only "dangerous" to warmonger-profiteers

    and New World Order traitors who will LOSE their seat on the Goldman

    Sachs gravy train once HONESTY is brought back to our White House

    and government. Apparently YOU live in that world of NEOCON bogus

    wars-for-profit, imperialistic world conquest and THUGS taking liberty

    away from Americans at home. Only a CRIMINAL would say the most

    honest man in government today is any kind of "danger".

    Ron Paul is a BLESSING!

  • Most government power intended to help people, ends up making capable people, dependent needy and crying for more...

    Power from people that is intended to help people, ends up making capable people- independent and confident that people cycle money, business, morality, respect,charity Better than any goverment...

    Because the government is not suppose to be in business!!

    Its suppose to be in Truth and Justice!

  • +1 for Ron Paul, -1 for annoying fruity loops track being too loud to hear what the quote is, lol.

  • Next time don't add bad music.

  • I could not hear of what the doctor says since the music was too loud.

  • Human liberty has always been the way foward, statism is a backwards concept which only serves to empower the ones running the state who fleeces even the middle class right under our feet.

  • Faceless meaningless bureaucrat who builds circuitry for bombs NOT supporting Ron Paul.... I can't make a living building solar panels....I'm voting Obama!

  • @squarecracker building solar panels is actually quite difficult and a fairly well paying job, just sayin'. You want to vote Obama, the man who has many a time proved his incompetence. Good luck making a living without a job.