Andrew Klavan's Talking Crap 3: ABSOLUTE CRAP!!!

[GregariousGorilla]

I can see democrats and liberals wanting to murder this guy.

[d3ltadrive]

@GregariousGorilla Well, when you can't attack the message you attack the messenger, so they probably do. It's a good think they're too stupid to have weapons in their homes.

[SparklestheClown]

This is so so so so true! Love IT!

[durexelitecondoom]

that's no crap to me!

[TheTruthHurtsAlot3]

Paul Ryan should choke on a Koch LOL

[kacplaymyst]

Wow it seems seven people like craples.

[PolishCutie93]

"Craples" lmao

[canofsand]

@MrSecureT What a persuasive argument you've made.

[bildo1977]

Well, this is what crappens when a naked Neo-Marxist/socialist/communis­t is elected as president. The Republicans throwing the election also helped make that crappen.

[Brontefan47]

Talking Crap is putting it nicely!  The Prez LIES out right over and over again. But what can you expect from someone who is not REAL. No one remembers him from college, no photos, no proof he existed before he became Illionois charmed candidate. He didn't exist before ... I guess.... and may not even be a real citizen. He certainly treats Americans as if they don't count. And he has so much contempt for our country. He is systematically trying to ruin our economy, or is he just an idiot?

[AgentDevlin]

Keep up the ggod work. In some countries (like mine) all the politicians are talking Obama-like crap.

American conservatives are the last of the mohicans!!!!

So, fight!!!!

[frongjumping]

I think somebody needs to take a page from Klavan's book and put out an Official English-Crap Dictionary for use during the next year's campaigns. That way, whenever Obama opens his mouth and a torrent of Crap comes out, voters will be able to translate it into proper English and cast their votes accordingly. After all, an educated populace is the basis of a successful democracy, right? Let's get cracking and enlighten the people, then!

[aquawoelfly]

@shotsky94 and what a wonderful. Job he did. I'm glad someone is bringing us hope and shange by hoping nobody notices the lack of change in anybodys pocket

[aquawoelfly]

Craptacular!

[mredyhcapamab]

This reminds me of the crap chick in Five Easy Pieces. :D EVERYTHING IS CRAP! But Obama is the most craptacular crapocalypse to ever occupy the Crap House. :(

[Siegetower]

Message from the rest of the Free World. Please get rid of Odumba.

[cowgirlmoon]

Don't forget that Obama hereited everything from Bush...... including a AAA credit rating..... and true to his word, he's changing that, also.

[shotsky94]

klavan is a liar neocon asswipe......barack saved us from what would have been economic catastrophe

[jarheadzader]

@shotsky94 You ara a dumbass

[shotsky94]

@jarheadzader fuck you peanut-butter-head

[brianmather]

3 people are totally ignorant and have their heads buried in their asses!

[DONGOE]

8/12/11 - 3 dislikes from fools.

[DONGOE]

BarackO is a liar and a total fraud.

[CHRISTOPHERDLAROCQUE]

Andrew, you ROCK!!! I love your posts. I usually find myself laughing so hard I have to pause, rewind, pause, rewind...just to get the whole thing. You are a genius.

[kruegerhaus]

Klavan you are AWESOME!  Stay on the CRAPatrol!

[Chilililabombwe]

Crapmongous!

[rockinandout]

"how do you like em crapples?" god I love klavan

[tjbphx]

Holy crap. This trips the light craptastic! I don't know which crappy phrase to borrow. They're all so good!

[paco114]

None of the deficit/debt reduction plans from Washington that I've seen will lead to any cuts in spending. They've merely been promises to reduce expenditures, all the while depending upon even more tax revenues. The plans leave ObamaCare alone, for the most part, which will and has already led to shortages and price increases. And, the tax increases will lead to a longer and more painful recession/depression. Paul Ryan's plan is better than the others, but that does not mean it's desirable.

[jepst41]

No matter what the upper tax rates are, from 91% under FDR to 28% under Reagan, the government will always take in between 17% and 20%. Under Reagan, federal revenue doubled. Tax cuts do NOT add to the deficit. They spur economic growth.

[carlindelco]

@jepst41 You see what your problem is , is that your making sense and citing facts. The libs won't be able to understand that, and will therefore hate it..lol

[rdubwiley]

@jepst41 This would mean that for every dollar spent on tax cuts, five dollars of GDP would need to be created. That seems a bit ridiculous.

Do tax cuts create growth, sure, but they're not miracle makers; they do need to be paid for.

[jepst41]

@rdubwiley Under Reagan, once he lowered the top rate to 28%, revenue to the federal government doubled. Tax cuts are but one tool to grow the economy. Another problem is we have a huge demographic shift coming. The baby boomers are about to retire. As it stands right now, we have 2 people working for every 1 person drawing on Social Security. And the "lock box" has special issue treasury bonds in it, rather than actual assets. IOU's. Bad craziness!!!

[rdubwiley]

@jepst41 you need one hell of a citation to prove that the economy grew that much under Reagan.

[jepst41]

@rdubwiley 1979, Federal tax receipts were approx. 463,300,000. 1989, it was approx. 991,100,000. Source: Tax policy Center.

[jnjnelson]

@rdubwiley Crap alert! Tax cuts are not spending, so they don't "need to be paid for." Saying that tax cuts need to be paid for is like saying I need to augment my income if I am demoted at work. I don't necessarily need to augment my income - I might merely stop buying so much crap.

[realhxq]

@jepst41 but i tell this to so many people and they will not listen .

[jepst41]

@realhxq Keep telling the truth!!!

[CecilCollins34]

@jepst41 It was actually 100 percent on FDR on income over $25,000. Minor correction.

[jepst41]

@CecilCollins34 Reference, please.

[CecilCollins34]

@jepst41 During World War 2 I should say....I will find you the Reference but you are right about the rest.

[jepst41]

@CecilCollins34 Oh, Okay. You are right. I should have said Truman, because my source only goes back to post WW2. No reference needed. I can look it up myself. ;)

[CecilCollins34]

@jepst41 Ah ok and yes taxes were absurdly high until Regan took office and he got rid of those tax brackets.

[truefictions]

Always 5 stars man. Thank you.

[msager666]

"tax cuts for the rich"? snooze. Seriously, get some new talking points. After 10 years that BS is more than worn out.

[rdubwiley]

I'd just like to remind everyone that Paul Ryan's budget assumes that the tax cuts for the rich he gives pay for themselves and do not add to the deficit, which is somewhat ridiculous as it would imply unprecedented growths to GDP.

[truckdawg43]

@rdubwiley Hmm never worked for a poor man before bet they dont pay to well .Investment has to come from the rich plain and simple.If there is no enticement why would you want to invest ,if you are gonna be penalized there is even less enticement .Hell even a person that is trying to build a company can tell you that.Once the Dems get sent home I am going to start mine but not until then .

[carlindelco]

@rdubwiley "unprecedented"? how bout reading some American history, (ie Roaring 20's and the 50's)?

[rdubwiley]

@carlindelco it would mean even larger growths than those periods. Also, let's remember that a bubble was created in the roaring twenties.

[carlindelco]

@rdubwiley There was a lot of real wealth in the 20's for those who were smart. The problem was exactly the same thing that caused the housing bubble and collapse. Buying on margin. Lower taxes and less regulation has always led to prosperity . Doing the opposite has always caused problems. That is an actual historic fact.

[SpartanLibertyTV]

Now THIS, is not crap. Friends don't let friends listen to crap.

Nice work Andrew!

[jculver1674]

The Pinocchio metaphor is apt. Except whenever Obama tells a lie, the Dow drops 100 points.

[kangarookirby]

Wow. My ears smell now.

[jimisback]

I thought you meant CRACK.

[jayko945]

amen



[DancinFool]

Andrew tells it like it is!