Building the World Trade Center and Twin Towers - Full version

[tennisguyky]

I agree I wish they had rebuilt the towers only stronger, better, and taller, but something is better than nothing and the new 1wtc will be as tall as the towers were. Such a shame what happened on 9/11, that a few crazy reactionary Muslims went ballistic and destroyed the towers and so many lives. Never again! Never forget!

[TurkishSoulBoy]

@tennisguyky 911 was an inside job not of the muslims.

[leonardwilson85]

I wish they rebuilt the real WTC instead of spending billions on this pussy Freedom Tower

[SoJustCool]

@leonardwilson85 agreed, except with a stronger structure, and even taller

[74pbg]

16:54 Epic Music! It fit's to these epic Tower's!

[djau2000]

at 13.05 what is the black/orange airbag on the left building?

[America100000able]

@djau2000

Tarps to protect workers while they are doing concrete work. Still standard in building skyscrapers all over the world.

[aper7720G]

No i se staly tak do czasu...!

[RobertoLopezstudyis]

Great documentary of the building of the world trade center in New York.

[TheRandomposting]

Years to build, Minutes to destory :*(

[drgzor]

@TheRandomposting seconds* 

[dartheadcolty]

@TheRandomposting :(

[vibeackermann]

@TheRandomposting 9 and 11 seconds

[kaydniscool]

hey dumb ass the twin towers are over in asia somewere the world trade center was mistakenly nicknamed after the twin towers in asia

[IIBlackened]

@kaydniscool They are known as the Twin Towers to some people, The Asia ones can suck my balls.

[Sviolinist]

@IIBlackened Yeah not only was the WTC *the* Twin Towers - I'm pretty sure the Asian Towers real name is like ching chiney chin chin chongy chin chong

[MNM2884nick]

@kaydniscool when was it created there?

[TODB0AMER]

Has this design now been BANNED? I mean, 1 and 2 hour fires... and they turn to dust!

[irobot2009able]

@TODB0AMER da!!

[GaCCow]

@TODB0AMER This design is still in use but the design is different because modern buildings use more concrete and stronger floors.

[TODB0AMER]

@GaCCow What about existing examples of WTC central core design towers WITHOUT the added concrete post 9/11 amendments? have THEY been condemned and demolished or rectified, would you live in one if they hadn't?

[GaCCow]

@TODB0AMER

The buildings that use exactly are many but small. A taller building is the Aon Center in Chicago, im not sure but I think that building uses concrete and much stronger floors.

Concrete for the reason to fireproof buildings is good, but the twins had some other weaknesses that was revealed on 9/11

[lmfecher]

@GaCCow

Weaknesses? REALLY? The towers were built to withstand hurricane force winds and multiple airliner hits. Yet on 9/11, two 110 storey buildings and one 47 storey building were obliterated into dust.

[GaCCow]

@lmfecher

The floors were bolted with 5/8" bolts to the perimeter and core and used viscoelastic dampers to allow movement, heat that up and it will fall apart pretty fast.

Sure they took the airline hit very well, but the fire on the weakened structure is something any building is hard to prepare for or have calculated for before construction begin.

[lmfecher]

@GaCCow

"Sure they took the airline hit very well"....

LMAO! Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, there would have been a crash and explosion AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2.  Instead, the entire airliner passed through the outer wall with no crash/impact, no deceleration, no crumpling of the nosecone, fuselage, wing or tail sections and then exploded inside the tower. IMPOSSIBLE.

[CokeAndPizzaplz]

@lmfecher havent you seen the videos THEY CAUGHT THE PLANES BEFORE THEY ENTERED THE TOWER, it's not impossible debris did fall out...

[lmfecher]

@CokeAndPizzaplz

"they caught the planes before they entered the tower"...

What the hell does that even mean?

In the case of UA 175 and WTC 2, the ENTIRE airliner passed through the load bearing steel framed wall without first crashing and exploding against it. IMPOSSIBLE.

[GaCCow]

@lmfecher

Lol you tripin' man a 767-200ER going like 500 mph easily penetrated the pretty lightweight perimeter trusses by either deforming or breaking the trusses or snapping the bolts on the top and bottom of them.

We are talking about a building here, not a 60 feet thick concrete wall, which would be needed to stop an airliner and make it into a small convenient pile.

And the no plane theory is fucking retarded and disrespectful.

[lmfecher]

@GaCCow

First of all, a 767 cannot travel 500mph at 800ft in a controlled flight situation because of air density and structural integrity.

Secondly, those "lightweight perimeter trusses" you're claiming were actually LOAD BEARING steel beams. How can an aluminum airliner loaded with fuel pass through load bearing steel beams without first crashing and exploding AGAINST them?

[GaCCow]

@lmfecher

You know that steel can still be lightweight even though it's steel right? A 3 floor high section had a weight of around 6 metric tonnes which i would call pretty light compared to the 56 ton core columns used.

The tanks of a 767 sits in the wings and middle fuselage and it also has a stab trim tank I think. That means that over half of the aircraft went into the building before it reached to the tanks and that was followed by a small delayed before the fuel ignited.

[lmfecher]

@GaCCow

"over half of the aircraft went into the building before it reached to the tanks"....

How did over HALF of the aircraft go into the building without first crashing AGAINST it?

[GaCCow]

@lmfecher

A 767 generates one hell of a punch, which as we saw pretty easily broke/snapped the perimeter walls and the aircraft still had lots of energy left to go deeper before it was shredded into pieces

I just checked your channel and your faves are pretty funny and there absolutely no point in continuing this discussion with you. kthxbai

[lmfecher]

@GaCCow

So you're saying that the load bearing steel beams broke and snapped and the aluminum on UA 175 was able to do that? LMAO!

Go back to sleep, Skippy.

[Mikester1200]

@lmfecher Good thing your a physics expert! O wait you get all your logic from people who tell you to believe them. Run along sheepling run along

[lmfecher]

@Mikester1200

And it's a good thing for me that you're a fucktard! You and the other parrots will be the first ones caged.

[Mikester1200]

@lmfecher Good thing you took time to make a smart comment now run along or your Shepard will give you 10 lashings for leaving the sheep heard

[Mikester1200]

@Mikester1200 Im glad you took time to make a smart comment now run allowing or your Shepard will give you 10 lashings for leaving the heard

[lmfecher]

@Mikester1200

I see you replied to your own comment before making the same one to me. Pressed the wrong "reply" button did you? That shows me you have the attention span of a gnat. Fuck off, loser.

[snoopy9949]

@GaCCow What a shame there wasn't just one single tree standing between the plane and the 500,000 ton steel and concrete tower. The plane on contact with the tree would have instantly disintegrated in a ball of flame and sent thousands of bits crashing to the ground. Instead it flew into the half a million ton building and just disappeared inside. By the way, your guess at the weight of a 3 floor high section is about as ridicules as the rest of your statements.

[GaCCow]

@snoopy9949

Lolololol u mad the ones at the very top had a weight of about 4 tonnes and the ones a the bottom just above the tridents weighed around 17 tonnes so the ones on WTC1 floor 93 and up had to be around 6-10 tonnes.

[snoopy9949]

@GaCCow I agree with you, I must be mad to waste my time talking to someone who can't make his mind up if the three story section weighs 6 ton or 10 ton. I say they weigh 19.5 ton. at floor 93. Now don't get side tracked, just tell me how the plane entered the building without loosing one rivet.

[GaCCow]

@snoopy9949 Aircraft have contact with the building, the bolted connections between the perimeter columns shears off. The speed was mainly the thing that provided the force for going into the building and the the most sturdy part of an aircraft is the bottom keel and the engine shafts.

And Without loosing one rivet? The aircraft surely started to disintegrate as soon as it hit the building, but we still had the speed and mass to deliver that punch.

[snoopy9949]

@GaCCow If you've given up with the steel weight argument please show me a video of a crash or explosion before the image of a plane has completely entered the building. Also, what we see is more than the bolts shearing off, a large section from over 40 columns has been removed.

[TurkishSoulBoy]

@GaCCow a tank was thinner than the wtc outside steel construction and no bullet and bombs destroyed the tanks.

[TODB0AMER]

@GaCCow why is height a factor? WTC1 had max' 20 floors above the alleged plane impact, 20 floors of the thinnest lightest steel in the building. Is there an independent audit for the steel salvaged from the twin towers? is it 'steel in equaled steel out'?

[GaCCow]

@TODB0AMER

I never said height is a factor, I just took an example of a building which is pretty close to the height of the twin towers.

Yes there was a audit of the steel but I don't know anything of that other then that from many of the samples the welded channels which the floor trusses was connected to had snapped,bent or deformed.

And what do you mean with "steel in equaled steel out"?

[TODB0AMER]

@GaCCow The salvaged twin tower steel...was it equal in weight to the steel that went into the construction of the twin towers?? simple!

[101HeyNow]

Poor cookey conspiracy theorist are too dumb to realize that the govenment its self started the theories to give the illusion that the government is strong and in control. Who really caused 9/11? A few angry muslims...

[manolodelano]

@101HeyNow Maybe a few angry muslims or a few angry americans...i don't kow, but i only saw alqaeda explode cars and poor people with bombs under their cloths... this is very complicated for this kind of people...maby... a few muslims joint a few americans...

[Xendrius]

@101HeyNow Get a brain will you, according to you 19 amature muslims from another country can cause what the most sophisicated and funded covert CIA and shadow government can't.

The arabs were CIA assets, the planes were drones, the WTC was blown up, and that' just the beginning.

[MazJax]

It's so sad to see how many people STILL believe the government tore down these buildings! It's so sad to see how easily people can be tricked out of their money by thieves like Alex Jones and Loose Change. I hope the so called "Truth Movement" wakes up soon, I mean really, you've accomplished nothing after an entire decade.

[georgefall5]

@MazJax The people quick enough to rule the goverment away from the attack is just as sad. People beleive every drop of what is shown on tv, the western world is overflowing with zombies. But irrelevant of what either of us beleive, It makes no difference. You still have to wake up everyday to go to work.

[MazJax]

@georgefall5 I used to be a conspiracy theorist, believe it or not. After a few months, I realized the theories are nothing but jokes. Please, twoofers, wake up. The government isn't a supervillain organization that would brutally massacre 3000 people for a few puddles of "oil" (which isn't even there) and still manage to stay covered for 10 years. They couldn't keep Cheney's hunting incident a secret, yet they can pull off the greatest conspiracy of all time? Hahaha!

[MazJax]

@georgefall5 What to do expect the twoof movement to do? Grab hold of Bush and Cheney by their collars while they say "And we would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling conspiracy theorists!" ?

Please, twoofers, get a life. You watch too many spy movies, you guys have no scientific evidence to back up any of your claims, and sometimes you're too stupid to realize your theories aren't physically possible.

[georgefall5]

@MazJax Surely you've seen the reports of the pentagon hits? I would love to see any genuine report that makes that look anything like a plane crash. I dont know if you realise theres alot of science proving the planes where not 100% to blame. The stuff about the planes not hitting at all is silly, The US has the power to stop the middle east to harvest its oil and destroy the people living there, Yet they manage to fail at controlling there own airlines.

[MazJax]

@georgefall5 There are several plane crashes that appear as if nothing ever hit. There are also several buildings that collapsed due to fire. WHAT A BIG SURPRISE.

"Invisible evil force"?? Are you insane? The guys that have been killing many americans in the middle east, scarred american life and made security systems paranoid, and cost US billions is invisible? WTF

Apparently, The government can pull off the greatest conspiracy of all time yet they can't keep clinton's sex scandal a secret LMAO.

[MazJax]

@georgefall5 I was only a twoofer because I hadn't spent a minute of research into 911. I blatantly accepted their lies and I feel ashamed for it. After I decided to see information for myself, from BOTH sides, It was clear to me that the twoofers should never be trusted. There are simply too many facts disproving you. Only 1600 so called experts are twoofers. That number is laughable. Those kids, Loose Change, claim theyre experts yet none of them have college education. And Alex Jones? Oh God.

[georgefall5]

@MazJax Im not going into anymore of it because as you said you where a conspiracy theorist yourself, but you prefer beleiving some invisible evil force of men with beards are flocking into your country because they dont like you. Google Tim Osman for an interesting read, Adds an interesting look on the tax money you've been giving to put young men into an early grave.

[shroomraptor]

@TheHungrySnail Here's the deal, these buildings weren't weak, they were structurally sound, built to last the test of time, built to withstand fully loaded jetliners and should still stand today. No simple kerosene fire could cause what we saw happen on 911. As stated in the video, they were each basically three buildings in one.

[shroomraptor]

@TheHungrySnail Weak? How the fuck you figure that?

[miamivicepastels83]

ive heard the conspiracy ppl talk about how is it that the buildings fell like that when a plane hit....sometimes when you knock out one element or weaken it ....such as by a plane...it affects the stability of the rest of the building . like if beams are weakened. or floors missing. all buildings are made by precise math calculations, and sometimes, if any of those are thrown off......

[redilliop]

I wish the average person wasn't so stupid to realize that AMERICA was the ONLY country in the entire WORLD that had TWO 110-story skyscrapers side-by-side. MORONS argue it was for office space, but to put up a 100 story build is phenominal in cost, technological advances to make the tallest in the world- TWICE, and AMERICA is the ONLY ones on the planet with the resources, technology, and vision to do it! You are UNAMERICA if you disagree!! Go back to your terrorist country if you disagree!!!!

[ComedyStanCam]

@redilliop I know right, the Petronas towers were only 88 stories, and they were taller because of a very stupid "spire".

[vomit55]

a core column like shown at 8:59 resurfaced here (after being sliced by a cutting charge):

620(.)photobucket(.)com/albums­/tt286/PLeasant/core-column-st­ubs-at-ground-zero-26(.)jpg

[botomfeader]

You mean these buildings weren't constructed of wet match sticks as the gov would have us to believe???

[1236bigcat]

On 9-11 I learned a new way to cut down trees ... Just hurl a beer can full of kerosene up to an area 20% below the tree top. Soon it will separate, even if it's a tiny flame, and the whole trunk below will just be crushed miraculously underneath, all drop like a rock. I mean a tree trunk, it's not like STEEL COLUMNS ...

Seriously now, the official un-truth of the media supported myth of the Tower's collapse defies any common sense, an official LIE that 2 planes took'em down that way.

[BeantownJim]

I can't believe a single plane on each building took them down!

[Agui007]

I've never seen this video before and I was fascinated by it. One of the documentaries about the collapse said many of the floors were destroyed where the plane impacted. I doubt this was the case for one of the reasons being that the fire, and smoke was clearly billowing out under pressure.